Field Status Varient
Any body can give the configuration settings or full details about Field Status Varient.... and Field Status Group....
Why it is required to be configured...in the system...?
Hi
TCode to be used-OBC4
For each category of general ledger account, e.g., cash accounts, expense accounts, you need to determine the status of every document entry field.
Eg.,Will text be required, suppressed or optional for document entry when using these GL accounts? Will cost center be required, suppressed or optional for document entry when using these GL accounts? Etc. etc.
These rules are grouped into field status groups for each category of general ledger accounts.Field status groups are assigned on the respective general ledger master records.The field status groups are collected under one field status variant.
The field status variant is assigned to company code(s). No posting can be made until this is complete.
Thanks,
Usha.
Similar Messages
-
Field status varient & field status group
Dear Sap Gurus,
Someone can clarify the following words please.I will be grateful for help.Thank you.
1.Field status varient
2.Field status group
3.Field status
Sincerely,
priya desaiHi Priya,
Field Status:
Field status controls which fields are required for document entry.like fields are optional,required or supress.
Field status group
Determines the screen layout for document entry.
Fields can have the following statuses:
Optional entry - you can enter data in the field
Mandatory entry - you must enter data in the field
Suppressed - the field does not appear on the screen
Use
Enter the field status group in the master record of a G/L account. When you enter a document, the definitions stored for the group are effective.
Dependencies
The field status when you create a document also depends on the posting key.
The field status groups available are those grouped together in a field status variant and assigned to your company code.
Field Status Variants
In this activity you can define and edit field status variants and groups. You group several field status groups together in one field status variant. You assign the field status variants to a company code in the activity Assign Company Code to Field Status Variants. This allows you to work with the same field status groups in any number of company codes.
You can also define and process field status groups. You must define a field status group in the company code-specific area of each G/L account. The field status group determines which fields are ready for input, which are required entry fields, and which are hidden during document entry. Bear in mind that additional account assignments (i.e. cost centers or orders) are only possible if data can be entered in the corresponding fields.
Thanks,
Rau -
What is the impact of field status in Field Status Group
Hi,
In MIR7, we want to make Cost Center Mandatory. For this we found the option of "Field Status Varient". We are using "Z004" Field status group in G/L account. In this FSG, we want to change the status of field "Cost Center" as mandatory from Optional.
We want to know what will be the impact of this change in any other transaction?
Regards
Vijay ShindHi
-
How to Change Field Status Group pertaining Value in SPRO
Dear Sir,
We are required to change the value for "Cost Center" as sppressed against a GL in the Field Status Group .
We followd following path :
Run Tcode FS00 , giving GL as 351200 , and on "Create/Bank/Interest" Tab double clicked the "Field Status Group" > Double click on "Additional Account Assignment"> Here against the Cost Center it is marked as Suppressed , but we want it to be marked as "Req Entry" .
Kindly guide me , how can this value be changed please .
Regards
B V Mittalhii
u can do it through obc4.
go to obc4 select the varient. and than go to G004 cost center field statu varient..
go to additional account assignments and than change status to the required field.
Than assign that G004 to GL account.
Thanks
sejal -
Field status as mandatory while creation of RE-FX Lease Out Contract
Hi SAP Real Estate Friends,
I have a requirement wherein we need to make the field status of some specific fields as mandatory for data input in RE-FX Lease Out Contract. The fields are mentioned below:
1. Profit Centre in Organizational Assignment Term.
2. Payment Terms in Postings Term.
3. Account Determination Value in Postings Term.
4. Resubmission Rule needs to be mandatorily selected by the user creating the RE-FX lease Out Contract.
5. Fixtures and Fittings Characteristics needs to be mandatorily selected by the user creating the RE-FX Rental Object.
Also we need to achieve a requirement that in case a posting has already been carried out for a given RE-FX Contract for a given Account Determination Value, same shall not be available for change in the RE-FX Contract subsequently.
Plz write back with your valuable inputs.
Thanx in advance
PankajHello,
You can set the field status from this path:
RECACUST > Contract > Dialog > Screen Layout > Field Groups > Field Status per Contract Type
Regards,
Suvarghya. -
Validation: Field status of G/L account
Problem: When posting non-goods receipt invoices in MIRO, G/L account and acct assignment object are proposed by purchase order, but they can be overwritten by users with no validation, often resulting in incorrect posting.
Such validation controls are in place for ME51N and ME21N. That is, the combination of GL account and account assignment are validated/checked against Field Status Group (FSTAG u2013 based on G/L master) as well as Account Assignment Category (in PO). I want to extend those controls to MIRO non-GR invoices.
This problems fits description in OSS Note 522101. The solution recommended in the Note is u201CPossible incorrect entries could be checked or corrected by validation or substitution if necessary.u201D
If I create a validation in OB28, how should I express the logic in "Check"?
Appreicate any help on this.Hi,
I do not think so that there are standard BADI or User Exit available in std sap for such validations.
It is a facility given by sap to post to a separate GL account in MIRO screen.
If you want a GL to be taken only with perticular cost center or other account assignment , try a user exit or try changing the std program for MIRO.
Regards, -
Field KNVV-CHSPL does not exist in field status tables (TMOD*)
Hi Gurus,
Wile creating Customer master record at Tc= XD01 the following error coming as
"Field KNVV-CHSPL does not exist in field status tables (TMOD*)"
Plz help me its urgent.
VinayHi
KNVV is the customer sales data table and CHSPL is the field name called Batch Split Allowed
My advice is to deselect the field name from the table and test it by creating it once again ...
Bobbili -
Field Status at Transaction Level
I want to change the field status for Business Place/ Section Code from Supress to Optional in transaction F-02.
How can I change Field status at Transaction Level ?Hi ,
FIelds Status can be changed by 2 ways
1, Posting Keys - any change in the Field status will Effect all the clients
2.Field Status Group Variant,which we assign in GL Master- Changes to FSG, Will Effect only Perticular Lilne Items of tht GL Account.
As Per your requirment, I do not think you can change the Field Status as Per Transcation i.e for F-02 or FB50 instead you can change the Field Status of perticular GL Account which you are posting the Transcation. which will b specific to the GL Account.
if you want the Changes across clients , you can change the Field Status By posting Keys.
Hope the Above Helps you .
Thanks
Goutam -
Posting Key Field Status changes - unable to generate Transport request
Dear All,
I did posting key field status change from suppress to optional ( P.Key 24).
However I am unable to generate a transport request.
Please share your inputs
Thanks
SanjaiHiii sanjai Babu... your client would have set automatic recording of changes in scc4... or the request would be created and yo woulnt have left the page after saving soo it might have been saved... hope it helps...
Regards
Abhay -
Impact of Field Status change in production
Hello Experts,
While doing MB1c intial stock upload i got an error that "Fld selection for mvmt type 561/acct 230000 differs for Ext GA amount in LC(023).
I found that the feild Ext GA amount in LC is made optional for mvnt type 561.
For gl 230000 the fsg is maintained as ZPL1 and that field is supressed.
But the GL 230000 is a balance sheet account so i think that we have to maintain the field status group as ZBS1.
For ZBS1 the field Ext GA amount in LC is optional only.
In production also for GL 230000 the FSG is maintained as ZPL1.
If we change the FSG from ZPL1 to ZBS1 in productin system what will be the impact.
Is this is the correct process or do we need to change the Field status for GL or Mvn=mt type.
Please guide me with correct solution.
Thanks in advance,
SatyaHello Atif,
There are some other differences are also there between ZPL1 and ZBS1.
Can you please let me know the solution for the below error
"Fld selection for mvmt type561/acct 230000 differs in Ext GA amount in LC (023)"
Am getting this error while am doing MB1c intial stock uplaod
Thanks,
Satya -
MIRO: Field Status control per GL master for non-goods receipt invoices
When posting incoming invoices in FI using FB60, the combination of GL account and CO account assignment are validated and checked against Field Status Group (FSTAG). Such controls are also in place in MM for purchase requisition (ME51N) and purchase order (ME21N), in addition to checking the account assignment category.
But there is problem in posting non-goods receipt (2-way match) invoices in MIRO u2013 system checks GL account and account assignment object according to account assignment category in PO, but not the field status based on GL account. GL account and acct assignment object are proposed by purchase order. However they can be overwritten by users with no validation, often resulting in incorrect posting. Wonder how other manage this issues in their companies.
I would like and need help in implementing a validation or user exit in MIRO which will check GL account against its CO account assignment for cost centre, order or WBS, based on the field status group of the GL master.
Q1, Where is the user-exit or validation maintained that checks the field status group in FB60 and ME21N (not in OB28 or GGB0)?
Q2. If purchase requisition and purchase order check field status group based on GL account, how can we make such controls available in MIRO?
Q3. What is the transaction code for developing a validation for MIRO? (MM MIRO not appeared in the application area of GGB0.)
Appreciated any helpHi
Th evalidation should be at the source is the Purchase Order. I beleive it is standard SAP Config to put the validation there. So once the PO has been created with the correct account assignments the GR and IR will be correct. -
Company code ZG01 is not assigned to a fiELD status variant
HI,
I have created company called 'zg01'.
when i try to create a GL ACCOUNT FOR this company using (FS00) i am getting the following error.
Company code ZG01 is not assigned to a fiELD status variant.
FOR YOUR INFORMATION I HAVE CREATED COA and assign the same to the company ZG01.
Please suggest....
also suggest how to i transport GL Accounts used by other companys of my system to my newly created company code : zg01.
so that i can save creation of GL ACCOUNT.You have to maintain field status variant and assign it to your company code. This is required for GL master data.
1. Define Field status variant in SPRO>Financial Acctg>Financial Acctg Global Settings>Document>Line Item>Controls>Define Field status variant. You create the field status variant and the field status group.
2. Assign the Field Status group to your company code SPRO>Financial Acctg>Financial Acctg Global Settings>Document>Line Item>Controls>Assign Company Code to Field Status Variants
Once you have defined this you will be able to assign field status group to your GL master data.
The use of Field Status Group is to determine the required/displayed/optional fields during posting transactions. -
Field Status Group influence when Purchase Requisition being created
Hi!
I have a requirement from a client regarding the influence of the Field Status Group on Purchasing Documents.
A Filed Status Group has been created in which has the CO/PP order set as Required entry for the Account Assignment.
This Group was then assigned to a GL Account.
When a Goods Receipt (MIGO) against a Purchase Order is entered for a GL which requires an Internal Order, the standard error message "Field Order is a required field for G/L account 0010 4105000100 " (message # F5808) appears if the Account Assignment on the PO is incorrect & no Internal Order has been entered.
This is fine & is how the system operates as standard.
However, the requirement from my client is to make this error message appear when a Purchase Requisition is being entered on the system, before it is converted to a PO & then receipted.
They believe that calling the message at the point of GR is too late in the process.
Could anyone advise on any possible BAPI, etc which could help us with this requirement??
Thanks,
kI have gone to the Tcode which has been given,
In the first field , I have given the company code,
in the second field , I have given call Plant (0002)
Validation ......how do i give the validation please let me know
With Regards, -
Field status of a specific field in different FSGs
Hi experts
This refers to filed stutus of a specific field in PO item, how it is set (Mandatory/Optiona/Display) in different field status groups.
Is this can be read from any table. I would like to see which FSGs set with Optiona/Mandatory for the given field (ex: storage location)
thanks
ramSivaKindly check in the below configuration
"Materials Management>Purchasing>Purchase Order-->Define Screen Layout at Document Level",
Regards
Irfan -
GL Account Field status setting conflicting with Account Assignment categor
Hi All,
A GL account could not be used for posting vendor invoice because of mismatch between the field status group setting for the GL account and the account assignment category. The Account assignment category in MM does not even have WBS field where as for the GL account the field WBS element has been suppressed. Because of this conflicting setting we are not able to post the vendor invoice.
What I am bothered about is there are lot of GL accounts being assigned to this field status group.
Can anybody please let me know what will be consequences if I make the changes to the relevant field status group?
Please let me know if there is any way-out for this Or is it ok with I go ahead with the changes required.
Regards,
S.SumanaHi Sumana,
If you are changing FS there will no problem but see that IT should not be combination of Required and Hide then system will give you the errorr.
In your case from MM change the status as optional.I think your problem will get resolved.
Thanks
RAVi
Maybe you are looking for
-
HT201318 How do I downgrade my iCloud storage and get a refund within the 15 days?
Help! How do I downgrade my iCloud storage and get a refund within the 15 days? I recently up-graded from 10 to 20GB in the middle of my storage plan, but I've changed my mind. How can I get a refund and revert my account back to its previous setting
-
I wanted to see what my iphone would do with the new ios7 when I was prompted to 'trust' or 'not trust' a computer that I was connecting. I selected 'don't trust' but now when I try to plug in again to the same computer it will not even ask me again
-
Flash builder 4.7 debug via usb device iPhone 4s - device not found
I cannot find my iphone 4s while trying to debug via usb =( i exported ipa and installed it via itunes - this works. but i would love to debug on device. im using actionscript mobile project air 3.4 im using windows 7 ==================offtopic======
-
I m using EclipseLink 2.0 With MySql. I need help in creating the following SQl Query Using CriteriaBuilder. SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Employee WHERE role = 'Manager'I was able to count without using the where clause using the following piece of code. C
-
Why the different file sizes?
Can anyone tell me why some songs are in the 20-30MB range, and most are only 3 or 4MB range? And more importantly, is there any way to shrink down the big ones? They make the CDs I burn very short indeed.