Fields in PNP not reflecting

Dear all,
i am adding one more infoset in LDB PNB , but all field are not reflecting.
Please suggest,
Regards,
Subhash

Hello Prathamesh,
Normally you don't need a server restart indeed. Be sure to set the priority of your new file to 'High', so it's used instead of the standard xml. The UWL uses for each system the xml file with the highest priority.
Hope this helps,
Freek

Similar Messages

Custom theme changes are not reflecting after SP upgrade in Portal 7.3

Hi,
I am facing issue with a custom theme after the upgrade of Portal 7.3 from SP7 to SP12.
The landscape has the integration of Web Dynpro ABAP components in Portal. The custom font color set for the field name is not reflecting, instead it show the font color in blank.
Looking for your inputs.
Thanks, Ansar

Hi Priya,
You need to Implement the following SNOTE's for these changes.
Union Budget 2015: As per Finance Bill 2015, the Government has implemented amendments to existing sections and introduced new sections in the Income Tax Act. Changes have been made in the following topics:
Tax Surcharge Rate
Increase in Conveyance Allowance
Section 80
Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme: The Government has launched this new deposit scheme for the minor girl child. This is a savings scheme that can be opened by the natural (biological) or legal guardian of a girl child aged below 10 years. Related Notes:
2139208 - Union Budget Changes – 2015
2138605 - Sec80C: Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme
Upcoming Developments:
PF Admin Charges Revision
Professional Tax for Mizoram & Nagaland states
Average Rate of Tax
Regards,
Venkat Polisetty

QM03-Custom tab-Change to text field not reflecting-FG - XQQM-screen-0106

Hi,
I have a requirement to change the text field on a custom tab of QM03 transaction. Quality notification type is Z1 and the tab is "Checklist". Both are custom defined.
The existing text field is of 3 lines. The new text message is of 8 lines. When I did the changes on the custom screen 0106 in the function group XQQM, the changes are not reflected on the QM03 transaction's custom tab. Only first 3 lines were reflecting the change and rest of the 5 lines are not appearing on the screen.
Pointers on this will be definitely helpful.
Regards,
Mallika.

I had a similar problem, but it was with the message line. I found that with Web Forms, I had to issue the Synchronize; a second time, but in Client/Server Forms 6i, the first synchronize worked. Here is the code I used:
<pre><font face = "Lucida Console, Courier New, Courier, Fixed" size = "1" color = "navy"> SYNCHRONIZE;
if Get_Application_Property(User_Interface) = 'WEB' then
synchronize;--first does not work on web
end if;</font></pre>
Let us know if this works.

Field lables changes in ESS iView not reflected on portal

Hi All,
I am trying to customize the SAP ESS Address DC (webdynpro Java) for South Africa region as per the SAP OSS note (No: 1428933).
In order to incorporate the changes I have imported the ess/za/addr DC into NWDS. I have changed the label text as per the OSS note and deployed the DC but changes are not reflecting in the portal
I did some more test on Label text;
1. Removed the Label text property value from DC and deployed the application, when I run the application during runtime screen is not showing any label text message for the label since I made it to empty.
1. I added my custom text message to label text value instead of standard label text value and deployed the application, when I run the application during run time screen is automaticaly showing the standard label text value not my custom label text value.
I'm trying to figure out from where these field labels value are coming from? Theoretically it should reflect field lables whats given in webdynpro but thats not the case here.
From where Label field value is coming?. Help me out in this. Thanks,
Regards, Suresh KB

If you are just changing the field label the recommended approach is to do it through Web Dynpro UI personalisation. DO NOT user NWDI to change the source code just for field label change. The way you change through UI personalisation is locate the iView in portal content, and select preview of iView then use CTRL+RIGHT click mouse button on the field that you want to change the text, you will see properties of selected field in a popup window where you can change the default text. Once you change it, and apply the changes you will be able to verify you changes in the iView properties (additional properties will be automatically created for the change you made). Now check the personal data service under ESS role you should see the change.
Hope this helps
Siva

Iview for a tcode not reflecting the fields completely.

Hi All,
I made an iview for a business partner in portal for its tcode.The tcode of Buisness partner is showing all fields in GUI.But when i am viewing the Business partner using it transaction iview it is showing properly except at a particular dropdown where it is showing only two fields out of three.One of the fields is getting missed out in the dropdown.
Regards.
Adity.

Ya ....just want to make my question little clear.
We have CRM 5.0 and EP 7.0.
We have a dropdown in tcode BP(Business Partner) called relationship.This dropdown when clicked shows only two fields ie.list and heirarchy and not reflecting field 'network' in portal but reflecting in GUI
The client and the user are correct.Am using SAP gui for HTML.
Regards.
Adity.

New field not reflecting in Table maintenance generator

Hi Experts,
I have added a new field in a ztable.I regenerated the table maintenance generator,so that the new field is reflecting in devlopment system , also a TR got created.When i moved this TR to pre-production system new fields are reflecting in the structure of table but not in table maintenance generator.
Please suggest solutions.
Regards,
Niranjan

Hi Experts ,
I have gone through the steps which is mentioned.But still issue is pending,the changes in TR are not reflecting in pre prod.
Error after moving the TR with "Definition of a Maintenance and Transport Object".
The current ABAP program "SAPLSVIM" had to be terminated because it has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
The following syntax error occurred in program "SAPLZFGL " in include "LZFGL$03
" in
line 13:
"Field "ZCHAR_FIXED_WIDTH" is unknown. It is neither in one of the spec"
"ified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement. ."

Service request fields enhanced through AET are not reflecting in BW DS

Hi All,
the CRM developer has added 3 service request fields to crmd_orderadm_h, crmd_service_h via AET. He has marked all the 3 fields as 'BW reporting relevant'.
I have now checked the BW extractors in the hope that these 3 fields will now be appended to the BW service request datasources automatically.
But instead of adding the fields to service request datasource(0CRM_SRV_REQ_INCI_H)(BUS2000223), it added the 3 custom fields to process datasource 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H.
I am not sure what exactly have gone wrong . Is there a way to get these custom fields automatically into 0CRM_SRV_REQ_INCI_H.
Thanks in advance,
Ramz

Hi Ramz,
this seems to be identical to
Re: Fields enhanced through AET are not reflecting in CRM DS Extract structure
Please find my reply there.
Best regards
Matthias

2LIS_02_ITM deleted line items are not reflected in BW

Hi,
Our current Data flow 2LIS_02_ITM-->DSO-->CUBE.
I am analyzing a Invoice, When it is created 01.04.2014 it has got 10 Line Items and all the data is load to BW,Invoice with 10 Line items.
In ECC I can now see the same Invoice only got 5 line items and from change log I can see 5 line items are deleted on 15.04.2014.These changes are not reflected in BW.In BW invoice data still shows 10 line items.
If I perform setup table job and ECC RSA3 for that invoice I am getting only 5.
I believe it’s something to do with 0RECORDMODE,Can you please let me know how to fix this in BW.
Thanks

Yes this is a known behavior in case of deltas.
For Deleted line items Rocancel field will have an entry with R.
To handle this you need to map ROCANCEL field in Technical group of transformation (Between Datasource to DSO) with 0Recordmode.
Once you will do that then after activating the data in DSO it will nullify the records and deleted order or item will not appear.
Regards,
AL

PO no not reflecting in GL/ Vendor line item display

Hi Guys,
Please let me know that why PO no (column is displaying but) data not reflecting in GL/ Vendor line item display using TCode FS10N? What may the possible reasons and how I can get the data flow in the column?

Hi Amit,
You are right and I've changed the layout. I've already said that the field displaying there but data is not flowing in the field. I mean to say that PO no is not reflecting in the specified field. However I am able to get the PO no. in Assignment field. What may be the reason and how I get the data (PO no.) in this field?

Recievables amoint is not reflecting in credit exposure value

"FBL5N - Account Receivable Reports-FI-SAP" is showing updated field of "Credit Control Area". But the same items are not reflected in the "Receivables" field of Credit Management Report hence not updating the Credit Exposure. What can be the reason for this?

solved!

Changes in server side java file not reflecting in Client side java code?

Hi friends,
iam using eclipse IDE, JBoss server, SWING GUI and Oracle DB
( looks like : SWINGGUI (Client) <--> EJB's (serverside) <---oracle )
my problem is , when i make change in server side bean file, that changes are not reflecting in GUI programs.
(for ex: iam adding settr and getter for a field and using that in GUI program. but its not identifying that setter or getter).
please tell me what should i do for every change done to server side program, that should reflect / available to GUI?

my problem is , when i make change in server side bean file, that changes are not reflecting in GUI programs.
(for ex: iam adding settr and getter for a field and using that in GUI program. but its not identifying that setter or getter).what do you mean it's not "identifying" the methods?
you have to call those methods you know
are you getting NoSuchMethodError?
please tell me what should i do for every change done to server side program, that should reflect / available to GUI?you haven't posted any code or error messages that might help us debug

SAP TM - Change in Search help in UI structure does not reflect in FPM screen

Hi Experts,
We have a FBI view in which we have added a search help to a UOM field by adding the standard search help /SCMTMS/SH_QUANTITY in the UI structure. The standard search help is showing in the UI. Now we want to add a filter in the search help by adding a constant value 'MASS' on the parameter DIMID (dimension) so that only the UOM's for weight are displayed. But this change is not reflecting on the FBI screen. Even if we remove the search help from the structure the change is not reflecting.
Can you please suggest if there is any way by which the FBI view can be refreshed so that it displays the recent UI search help addition.

Hi Sayak,
Except the report above, you can also attach the search help to the UI fields in the view exit class configured in your FBI view dynamically.
BR, Dawson

Change in Search help in UI structure does not reflect in FPM screen

Hi Experts,
We have a FBI view in which we have added a search help to a UOM field by adding the standard search help /SCMTMS/SH_QUANTITY in the UI structure. The standard search help is showing in the UI. Now we want to add a filter in the search help by adding a constant value 'MASS' on the parameter DIMID (dimension) so that only the UOM's for weight are displayed. But this change is not reflecting on the FBI screen. Even if we remove the search help from the structure the change is not reflecting.
Can you please suggest if there is any way by which the FBI view can be refreshed so that it displays the recent UI search help addition.

Hi Sayak,
Except the report above, you can also attach the search help to the UI fields in the view exit class configured in your FBI view dynamically.
BR, Dawson

Down Payment entries not reflecting in J1INMIS report

Dear Guru's,
TDS deducted at the time of down payment made to vendor is not reflecting in J1inmis report.
Is J1INMIS report does not reflect down payment entries?
What will be the reason for this?
Which alternative report to followed for J1INMIS !!!
Waiting for your positive reply.
Regards,
Sany.

Hi Sany,
To update Business Place & Section Code, execute the program given below. After execution of the program run T.Code J1INPP and your issue should get resolved. Let me know if this works.
Ask the Abaper to write the following Code & execute the program:
REPORT ZFI_BUP_SEC_CHANGE.
TABLES : BSIK,BSAK,BSEG.
parameters: PA_BELNR TYPE BSEG-BELNR OBLIGATORY,
            PA_BUKRS TYPE BSEG-BUKRS OBLIGATORY,
            PA_GAAHR TYPE BSEG-GJAHR OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS : PA_BUPLA TYPE BSEG-BUPLA NO-DISPLAY,
             PA_SECCO TYPE BSEG-SECCO NO-DISPLAY.
PA_BUPLA = 'MUM'.                               (Note : Use the Business place & section Code Used
PA_SECCO = 'MUM'.                                         in your company code).
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM CHANGE_DATA.
END-OF-SELECTION.
*&      Form CHANGE_DATA
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
FORM CHANGE_DATA .
DATA : LT_BSEG TYPE TABLE OF BSEG WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSIK TYPE TABLE OF BSIK WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSAK TYPE TABLE OF BSAK WITH HEADER LINE.
BSeg updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSEG
FROM BSEG
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSEG.
IF LT_BSEG-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSEG-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSEG-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSEG FROM LT_BSEG.
    Write : / LT_BSEG-BELNR, 'Update For BSEG', LT_BSEG-BSCHL,
              LT_BSEG-BUPLA,LT_BSEG-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Bsik updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSIK
FROM BSIK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSIK.
IF LT_BSIK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSIK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSIK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSIK FROM LT_BSIK.
    Write : / LT_BSIK-BELNR, 'Update For BSIK', LT_BSIK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSIK-BUPLA,LT_BSIK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
BsAk updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSAK
FROM BSAK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSAK.
IF LT_BSAK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSAK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSAK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSAK FROM LT_BSAK.
    Write : / LT_BSAK-BELNR, 'Update For BSAK', LT_BSAK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSAK-BUPLA,LT_BSAK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.                    " CHANGE_DATA
Thank You.

LPA changes are not reflected fully in 2LIS_02_SCL

The changes done to scheduling agreement, schedule lines are not reflecting in 2LIS_02_SCL, and there by resulting errors in delta update in BI system.
For example
     LPA     RM     SCL     Quantity                                    (2LIS_02_SCL)
ODS(A)      3001             15          800
ODS(C)     3001     X     15          300
     3001          15          800
PSA      3001     X     15          400
        3001             15          900
As we are using the Update type Addition,
From PSA, it is clear that the change is 500; this change got reflected in ODS properly.
But when I compare ODS data with EKET data,
LPA     SCL     ODS(Active)          EKET
3001     15     800               900
As you can see wrong validation results between BI & R3
I am missing the below changes happened to SCL in the extractor
     3001     X     15          300
     3001          15          400
The missing above entry is resulting errors.
Does anybody know how the EKET line changes can be tracked?
How to check the V3 Update, we checked the program: RMBWV302
Does anybody have idea where to track this error.
Note: the above case is happening to only a for few documents
Regards,
NK.A
Message was edited by:
        nandakumar a

Hi Renjith,
Thanks for the reply. Can you please let me know few more answers to the below points.
As the datasource 2LIS_02_SCL does not takes this event into account (only MA, MB, MC and MD), this field is not passed to BW (you can see the events per datasource in transaction LBWE)
You are referring to posting of the Material Ledger posting right ? Can you please give some more information about MA MB MC MD as I have verified in LBWE and could not find anything about it except that its picking that GLMNG value from MCEKET table.
Renjith, Please update your views on the below query. I am not able to get any answers from anyone on this query. I appreciate your reply.
In my opinion you would be able to fill it in the customer-exit of LIS (EXIT_SAPLEINS_001) or BW (EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001)
If I add a zfield to the SCL DS and then populate that field with the code in the include ZXRSAU01 , EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 in that going to help.
Do I have to verify the events MA MB MC and MD while populating this zfield or I can just do a direct lookup on EKET
select single * from EKET
where EBELN = l_MC02M_0SCL-EBELN
and EBELP = l_MC02M_0SCL-EBELP
and ETENR = l_MC02M_0SCL-ETENR will do ?
So when ever the ds fields are getting populated in the org DS ...it will find this zfield in the same structure and will fill this field. Is that going to fix it ? I have also found couple of SAP Notes on the same issue and do you think implementing those notes will fix the problem without the zfield or code.
Could you please check out these notes 100690 and 431145. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Daniel

Fields in PNP not reflecting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for