Fields missing for multiprovider

Hi
I am creating a multiprovider on a ODS and i am unable to see all the fields to add to the multiprovider.but when i directly look into ODS, i can see the fields .
why some fields are missing can someone help me.
Thanks
imran

Hi,
because some of the fields might be attributes only. Check within the infoobject maintenance of the infoobjects in question.
regards
Siggi

Similar Messages

Query problem: Some fields missing for org unit

I'm currently trying to fix a Minimum Compliance Report with some missing fields.
For a specific organisational unit no data is being generated for distribution and logistics.
How can i make sure organisational units generate a compliance figure correctly. The formula in the query is fine however when i generate the report there are X's in some fields.
How can i find the error?
any advice will be appreciated
Cheers
Neil

Hi Neil,
Have you tried using the function NDIV0 or NOERR in your formulas? The X in some of the fields may be due to undefined values (e.g. division by zero).
Hope this helps,
Juice

Field disappeared for Multiprovider

Hi !
I have created a multiprovider based on two infoprovider. I want a field to be visible in query which is present in ODS but not in infocube .After I have loaded data a strange thing is a happening....
I can find the value of the field of the multiprovider when selected alone. But when I want to see the records along with other fields that field is coming blank.
Can anyone help me out..?

I think you need to add the key figure from the Cube as a Restricted Key Figure and restrict on the Characteristic that only exists in the ODS. You should then be able to set the restriction to either '#' or 'Constant Selection' to show the value of the Key Figure from the Cube. Do you follow?

Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product 000000008660000814 PAL

Hi Experts,
I found CIF error in SMQ2. The error states "Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product 000000008660000814 PAL '.
I checked the data in MM03 , where alternate unit of measure is PAL. One PAL Is 96000 EA.and i found GRoss Weight and NET Weight is showing Zero.
I checked the same in /sapapo/mat1 , it is showing 1PAL = 5760 ea.and i found GRoss Weight(2, 078.440 and NET Weight(1,800.32) .
How to rectify thsi error. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Manasa.

Hi Rishi,
Thanks. Please check teh OSS Notes Note 1519355 - Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product and advice me.I am pasting the same notes below.
Summary
Symptom
Field /SAPAPO/MARM-GEWEI unit missing for product
Other terms
/SAPAPO/MAT067, UOM
Reason and Prerequisites
The reason of the error is, that the 'Unit of Weight' is missing for the alternative unit of measure(UOM) in the material Master Data.
Solution
From R/3 perspective,
If no gross or net weight is maintained in a unit of measure, it is not nessesary to maintain a unit of weight. However CIF in APO checks the field GEWEI for all entries of table MARM. If the field GEWEI is blank in any of the MARM entries then you will get the error message . The following are ways to correct this error;
1) Delete the alternative UoM in APO for the product in /sapapo/mat1. Afterwards process the faulty queue and all alternative UOMs will be correctly available in APO and thus, the masterdata is consistent.
2) Maintain the 'Unit of Weight' that is missing for the alternative units in the material masterdata in R/3. Afterwards retransfer the masterdata to APO.
3)use the userexit EXIT_SAPLCMAT_001 (where you can change
MARM and MARMX values) and maintain the missing 'Unit of Weight'so that MARM-GEWEI is filled before transfering the masterdata to APO.

Issue for Production Price list field missing

Hello all,
I have a strange issue with a field missing in the issue for production window. When an issue for production is created, the Price list field is missing. Please see the attached screenshot. Does anyone know how to show this field? I have checked form settings and it's not an option there.

Hi Chris
Following is the SAP Note No: 1720071
Symptom
When opening "Issue for Production" from "Production Order", "Price List" field is missing.
Reproducing the issue
1. Login to SAP Business One.
2. Go to Production->Production Orders, open a "released" production order document.
3. Right-click a row whose "issue method" is "Manual", and choose "Issue Components". (If all the rows have "Backflush", you need to change one of them.)
4. "Price List" field is missing on the left top of the new screen.
5. If you click "Attachments" tab, the field will be showing correctly.
Solution
Current workaround is to click "Attachments" tab to make "Price List" showing.
The issue is planned to be fixed in SAP Business One 9.0.
With Regards
Balaji

Newly-added field missing in the field catalog for NR00

I am about to creat condition record for condition type NR00 free goods . I need to make some customizing to meet our requirement .So I changed the field catalog for the condition table by adding a new field BWAST (purchasing document type) . After that I am going to creat a new condition table 501 with this newly-added field ,but I can't find the field in the right part for field catalog .
Can you give me some advice ? Thank you in advance.

I 've got the answers ,
Note 21040 - Allowed Fields not appearing for condition table
thaks

Fields missing in ID

Hi,
Here we are using XI 3.0
Service pack:09
Release:30_VAL_REL
When i tried to do Integration builder configuration some fields hae been missing
For Eg : In the Businees Service- communication channel- i am not able to see the fields of Run Operating System Command Before Message Processing and After Message Processing Fields have been missing.
What could be the problem?
Could you please help on this issues?
Regards,
Senthil

Hi-
Check if you have activated it properly in IR.
Also check if SXI_CACHE is updated.
Also it may be the Service pack problem mentioned by others

FIELDS MISSING

Hi,
When i replicated CO-PA data into BI. It created two DS's:
0COPA_RCTY AND 1_CO_PA_XXXXXXX
I created an Infosource and transfer rules for 1_CO_PA_XXXXXXX but there are a few fields missing that i do see in the operating concern such as:
ARTNR=0MATERIAL
KNDNR=0CUSTOMER
BZIRK=0SALES_DIST
Why are these fields not in the Infosource since they are in the operating concern?
Where would they be?
Thanks

Delete the data source and then need to re-create using KEB2 transaction. While re-creating the data source use the same old name so that there won't be any changes in the BW side when you need to assign the data source to info-source. Just replicate the new data source in BW side and map the new field in info-source.
(you can also try, goto KE24 and edit the dataaource and add your fields not 100% sure of it works)
how to select fields refer doc:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fb07ab90-0201-0010-c489-d527d39cc0c6

Fields missing on FB60

Hi,
I have a couple of questions.
1. I see there are a few fields missing on the line item level on FB60. It's not the case for development or testing environment. But in Production it's happening. Does anyone know how to get these fields back?
2. Is there a transaction where I can clear multiple documents at once instead of one like FBRA?
Thanks

Hi!
Field is missing in FB60 screen, please brief which field you are missing and whether its comes earlier, if so please check is there any variant create, u can see this variant at end of the line item screen in top position. when u put your cursor there it will show u the configuration, click there and see if any variant is used, if so remove that and put tick on use as standard setting and try.
FBRA is not for clearing the document, but it reset or reset and reverse the clear document.
for clearing of vendor tcode is f-44
for clearing of g/l tcode is f-03
for clearing of customer tcode is f-32
Rakesh

Reconciliation Account missing for vendor

Hi All,
When i am running the MRKO transaction for Settlement for a particular vendor and posting date of December 2009, i am getting a message that Recon. acct missing for account VENDOR. Enter a recon. acct in master record. Can anyone let me know how to get this resolved?
Thanks:
Siddharth

Transaction FK02, select Accounting info. under Company Code data for your Company Code.
Make an entry in the reconciliation account field.
Nick

LastDataRefresh(ROLLUPTIME)-does not show correct date for multiprovider

Hi,
The Last data refresh (Rolluptime) shows incorrect date for multiprovider and we use lot of multiproviders.
Removing the last data refresh from the "Information" button of the Bex Web Analyzer which is using the "Information field web item", shows an empty space and a colon ":" and an empty box.
Please let me know if there is any other way to remove the last data fresh without showing the empty space.
We are on SPS 7 and FEP 7. Is this problem still exist in SPS 8/FEP 8?
Thankyou,
-Sini
Message was edited by: Sini Kumar

Depends on your definition of correct. Your initial question was that this time does not display. This time should display. For a multprovider, it uses this formula
first(last(<All InfoProviders under Multi - ROLLUPTIME>))
It uses the earliest rollup time from the last rolluptime of all the base providers.

Crystal Report VS2005 - Table fields missing in Database Expert

Hi,
I am having a problem with the Crystal Report comes with Visual Studio 2005. I am trying to develop a customized report for SAP Business One. When I try to add two tables using the Database Expert, there are certain fields missing in the LINK page. This is a big problem for me because I need to link that field with another table. Oddly, it doesn't seems that there are anything wrongs with the missing fields. If I click OK and check at the Field Explorer, the missing fields are there!!!
In other words, it is missing only at the Database Expert --> Link Tab. Anyone having the same problem? Is this a known issue or any patch that I can apply to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Harianto

Try this link to resolve your issue:
Full Outer Join option for SQL Query and BW Query grayed out
Thank you
Don

What are the 3-bit field choices for Hw_Arm_Sel in PCI-6601

Hi,
I am programming our own driver to operate the PCI-6601. For our application we need hardware arm option. I know it is possible to use 2 counters for that, but NI-TIO should support also hw_arm. Although it is not explained in the registry document at all, after some tedious check in the DDK examples I found that this bits are located in the Gi counting mode register. I know the position of the HW_enable as well as the position of the 3 bits for pin sellect options. What I do not know is What are the 3-bit field choices for Hw_Arm_Sel . I contacted NI support but got no support. How can NI sell boards and when a customer who is not using LAbview or Measurement Studio or DDK, but is implementing his own driver is then so arrogantly turned down from NI? Also, how can NI publish just part of the registers the board support, and when a customer contacs and asks for some registers get not at all support? I can not foretell the missing registers, and it is pretty unprofessional to document just partly the registers of 660x devices. And on request you got nothing.
I hope someone from the community know about this Hw_Arm_Sel 3 pin options. Otherwise, there is just an option of error and trial. Or simply throw the board in the garbage.
Dr. Kirco Arsov
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Kirco,
I have some more information for you :-)
I haven't been able to speak to the developer who is the most familiar with TIO programming since he's out of the office, but I have come across his notes from when he was writing support for the DAQmx driver.
As I described earlier, the HW_Arm_Sel bits don't select a connector I/O pin, but an internal trigger signal. There are seven internal trigger lines, and the HW_Arm_Sel bits map directly to the internal trigger signal: 0b000 - 0b111 map to 0d0 - 0d7. In order to route an I/O pin to an internal trigger, you must also write to a few more registers.
From what I've read, there are two more register families that need to be programmed: TG_x_LevelEdgeReg and TG_x_CombinationReg, where x is the internal trigger number. In your case, you only need one pin from the I/O connector to be your arm start trigger, so TG_0_LevelEdgeReg and TB_0_CombinationReg will suffice for your application.
TB_0_LevelEdgeReg :: Offset 0x660
TG_0_LevelEdgeReg is only 8 bits wide, and maps as follows:
7..6: EdgeMode
5..0: LESel
LESel selects the I/O connector pin to use as the source for the internal trigger signal. 0d0 - 0d39 will select the I/O pin of the same number. NB: behavior for TG_x_LevelEdgeReg is more limited for triggers 1-7, and only a small subset of the I/O pins can be selected for those trigger signals. Trigger 0 can use any I/O pin. Setting these bits to 0d63 forces the trigger source low, and can be used as a way to 'unroute' it when you're finished with your program.
EdgeMode determines whether the TIO will detect an edge of the incoming signal, or just pass the signal level straight through. When detecting edges, it will latch the signal and generate a single TIMEBASE3 pulse instead. 0b00 sets level mode; 0b01 sets rising edge; 0b10 sets falling edge; 0b11 sets either edge.
TG_0_CombinationReg :: Offset 0x6A0
TG_0_CombinationReg is 32 bits wide, and has three fields of interest:
19..16: CombFunction
5..4: CombTypeB
1..0: CombTypeA
CombTypeA controls which trigger subsystem to use as the source for the trigger signal. Since you're coming from an I/O pin and using the edge/level subsystem, you must set these bits to 0b01.
CombTypeB is similar to CombTypeA, and although you won't be using trigger B, set it to 0b01 to be safe.
CombFunction performs a simple logic function on A and B. Since you're only using a single I/O connector, you only need the A output, so set these bits to 0b1100.
All of the other bits should be set to 0b0.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to test these statements since my test machine is currently being used for another research project. Please let me know what happens if you decide to test.
Joe Friedchicken
NI VirtualBench Application Software
Get with your fellow hardware users :: [ NI's VirtualBench User Group ]
Get with your fellow OS users :: [ NI's Linux User Group ] [ NI's OS X User Group ]
Get with your fellow developers :: [ NI's DAQmx Base User Group ] [ NI's DDK User Group ]
Senior Software Engineer :: Multifunction Instruments Applications Group
Software Engineer :: Measurements RLP Group (until Mar 2014)
Applications Engineer :: High Speed Product Group (until Sep 2008)

Tax statement item missing for tax code A0

I got intercompany billing that has not been released to accounting, when I tried to release to accounting got this error message :
Field Profit Ctr is a required field for G/L account 6000 14112100
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Profit Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "14112100" in company code "6000" linked to the field selection for posting key "50".
System response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Profit Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
when I looked at it because IV01 in billing document is empty and PI01 in sales document is empty, when I tried to add the value IV01 in intercompany billing manually and tried to release again got this error message:
Tax statement item missing for tax code A0
Message no. FF805
Diagnosis
No tax item exists for tax code A0 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
Procedure
Enter an OSS message.
Can someone help please? I can't correct the SO and DO because it's in the past already can't be reversed.
regards,
Dwi

Hi,
Please check the following note
Note 971253 - Causes for error message FF805 in SD
I hope it will help you.
Regards,
Jigar

Some Mail fields missing in transfer

I transferred my stuff from my old Mac laptop to a new laptop (Macbook Pro) using Migration Assistant. Everything seems to have transferred just fine except for some data in the Mail boxes, most notably names in the "To" field in the Sent box are missing for approximately the last year. Names before September 09 are there, just the "To" field is blank up to the day the transfer was made (a few days ago), after that the names appear there again.
This is a strange thing and only effects the "To" field in the "Sent" box and only for the last year before the transfer. Because having those names is actually important for business I'm wondering if anybody has any insight into this? The old laptop was running Tiger. Of course I can look up those names on the old laptop, so all is not lost. Thanx.

You could always visit the Mac OS X v10.6 Snow Leopard > Mail and Address Book forum area here:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1338

Fields missing for multiprovider

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for