File copied In production

Hi All,
I have copied my file in the production ..the same file which is working in Dev server and QA server
but it doesn't work in production.
I am wondering that simple jsp file is not working in production.
As per basis person he copied the exact file at the exact path but I can't see my changes in the production.
Can anyone help me for this? what else I can do to see my changes.
Regards,
Deepika

You can use the SSIS Import/Export Wizard to copy the table over:
http://www.sqlusa.com/bestpractices/ssis-wizard/
You can get more assistance at:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/home?forum=sqlintegrationservices
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SQL Server 2014 Database Design
New Book / Kindle: Beginner Database Design & SQL Programming Using Microsoft SQL Server 2014

Similar Messages

Webservice client : different wsdl file for test/production environment

In an ADF application, I need call a web service in model project
In my company, we have 2 environments : test and production.
This webservice is deploye in test server and production server.
So there are 2 different wsdl file for test/production.
I want to make my ADF Application portable cross the 2 environments.
An environment variable can indicate in which environment the ADF application run.
According to this variable, application choose which wsdl/endpoint to call.
If I use "web service Data control" wizard, how can I achieve this?
If I use "webservice proxy" wizard, how can I achieve this?
Thanks!!!!!!

Hi,
I have a model project with ws proxy client and on this proxy I added an adf ws connection called CustomerExperience
then I can do this.
// a test to try to overrule the adf ws connection from EM
Context ctx = null;
try {
ctx = ADFContext.getCurrent().getConnectionsContext();
WebServiceConnection wsc = (WebServiceConnection) ctx.lookup("CustomerExperience");
CustomerExperience customerExperience = wsc.getJaxWSPort(CustomerExperience.class);
} catch (NamingException e) {
LOGGER.severe("got web service loading fault: "+ e.getMessage());
throw new JboException( messages.getString("NOM-999"),
"NOM-999",
null );
I exported this to an adf jar and added this to a webapp.
On runtime the ws connection is not dectected by the webapp so need to copy this ws conn to the connections of the webapp. This works
but can I change it from wlst instead of EM , is this possible?
I don't see the WS connection in wlst (oracle common) adf_listURLConnection('CE_Portal')
thanks

Need client copy of production server in quality server

Hi,
I need the client copy of production server with application data in quality server. How i do this?
Main purpose is we have no data in quality server in testing purpose. if we configure the client of production server in Quality, we can test it by our requirement.
Regards
Somu

Try this
Preparatory steps in source SAP system
1 Take the trace of control file in the source system using the following command at SQL prompt as below:
SQL>alter database backup controlfile to trace;
The trace file can be found in the location <drive>\Oracle\<SID>\saptrace\usertrace.
2. Open the file with notepad and save a copy as controlsrc.txt
3. Stop the SAP
4 Shutdown the database from SQL prompt.
5. Take backup of database files.
6. Start SAP
Steps in the Target system
7. Install SAP system with <TGTSID>
8. Stop the SAP.
9. Shutdown the database from SQL prompt.
10. Take the backup of database files.
11. Edit controlfilesrc.txt with regard to the locations of datafiles of source system to be placed in target system taking in to account the space available in different drives and save as control.sql. Also SET DATABASE u201C<TGTSID>u201D RESETLOGS.
12. Replace the database files with source systems database files conforming to the control.sql
13. Start the database in nomount state from SQL prompt as below.
SQL>startup nomount
14. Run the control.sql script as follows:
SQL>@@<location of directory>\control.sql.
Once the script runs successfully, the database will be in mount state
15. Open the database with resetlogs option as follow:
SQL>alter database open resetlogs;
16. Create OPS$ users of source system conforming to target system conventions in database.
17 Set the environment variable dbs_ora_schema to SAP<SRCSID> as the owner of the database objects will still be as SAP<SRCSID>..
18. Start SAP.
Lalit Kumar

Help with large file copy to WKS

I need to copy a folder and all of it's contents from
\apps\reallybigfolder to each workstation at c:\putithere.
Because of the size of the file copy, I chose to create an app object
with logic that says if xxx.exe exists then do not push. Basically, I
don't want this thing to just run constantly. I need it to run one time
to each workstation on the network when the users log in.
I have tried pointing the app object to \public\ncopy.exe and then
setting the parameters the way I want them, but I keep getting an
error: "Cannot load VDM IPX/SPX Support". The two files in the folder
are copied, but the subfolders are not. I have tried using the /s/e
switches, but it does not help.
I have also tried writing a .bat file, to test it - but I get the same
results as above. So next I tried using copy instead of ncopy. I do not
get the error message, but it still does not copy any of the subfolders.
Is there another way? An easier way? I really appreciate the help.
Tony

What you are doing should work.
It sounds as if there are some other workstation issues going on.
I don't think I seen or could make the error "Cannot load VDM IPX/SPX
Support" happen if I tried. Perhaps this would happen w/o a Novell
Client installed. In such a case you could use XCOPY or ROBOCOPY.
(Robocopy is way cooler than XPCOPY and is free from MS.)
You can also use the "Distribution Tab" and the "Files" section to copy
entire directories. Just use *.* as the source.
[email protected] wrote:
> I need to copy a folder and all of it's contents from
> \apps\reallybigfolder to each workstation at c:\putithere.
>
> Because of the size of the file copy, I chose to create an app object
> with logic that says if xxx.exe exists then do not push. Basically, I
> don't want this thing to just run constantly. I need it to run one time
> to each workstation on the network when the users log in.
>
> I have tried pointing the app object to \public\ncopy.exe and then
> setting the parameters the way I want them, but I keep getting an
> error: "Cannot load VDM IPX/SPX Support". The two files in the folder
> are copied, but the subfolders are not. I have tried using the /s/e
> switches, but it does not help.
>
> I have also tried writing a .bat file, to test it - but I get the same
> results as above. So next I tried using copy instead of ncopy. I do not
> get the error message, but it still does not copy any of the subfolders.
>
> Is there another way? An easier way? I really appreciate the help.
>
> Tony
Craig Wilson
Novell Product Support Forum Sysop
Master CNE, MCSE 2003, CCN

Any solutions to Apple's poor file copy function

For many years Apple's OS - all versions on all computers does not have the intelligence to copy files from drive to drive. Does anyone know of a different software program that can help the Apple OS do this simple task?
A little more info - I have never been able to get any Apple product - all the way back to System 7 to be able to copy files unattended. The latest annoying problem comes from a need to move files from my Thunderbolt 1 TB SSD drive to an attached Toshiba 2TB drive. I have a folder with about 1500 photos that I need to move from the SSD to the Toshiba drive to clear up space on my SSD drive. I am using my MB Pro with OS 10.9.5 with 16 GB ram and a 1 TB internal SSD drive and it does not matter if I select 5 files or 500 files, it never gets more than 20 files into the copy and then very stupidly thinks some random file is in use. No Apple OS has the intelligence to think that if this one file can't be copied at this time, that it should continue the copy operation. The copy process shuts down then I have to look file by file to see which files it did successfully copy. Then delete the files on the drive and select another 50 files and get another 4 or 5 copied and then do it again and again and again and again, etc...
I have the same problem using my Mac Pro workstation with 32 GB ram, the same problem on all 4 of my MbPro notebooks. The problem is 100% within Apple's OS. Obviously none of the files are ever in use. Also, rebooting the computer does not change the situation. Problem has existed since my PowerMac 8100/80. It would be nice to see Apple address this problem or someone else write a basic file copy program that works.
Thanks
George

Mark
Appreciate your observations but there are a couple of issues at point
#1 - The OS incorrectly thinks a file is in use when it is not. It does not matter if I select and copy or drag and drop. Minutes later the same file will usually copy. Does not matter if it is an image from the iphone or a word doc or excel file or a video file.
#2 - The OS is incapable of continuing a copy function when it has incorrectly told itself that a file is in use. A superior file copy function would flag the error and continue copying. No idea why Apple has not fixed this about a decade ago. It has to be deeply embedded in their system software.
The issue is the same if it is with an original Mac Pro copying between internal hard drives or involving external hard drives or a NAS drive. It has plagued me for a very long time. As I find hard drives that I want to move everything off of so I can reformat or replace I have to go through this painful ordeal which involves initiating the copy function hundreds of times. I have almost finished copying 657 photos that were copied from my iPhone to the SSD drive and I wanted to get them off the SSD drive. It took several hours yesterday and I have been at it for about 4 hours tonight. It sure seems like it should be as easy as dragging the folder from one drive to the other and it would be if there was some way to disable that stupid "file in use" error in the Apple OS.
Thanks
George

File Copy Dialog box hangs in mid-copy; Cancel does nothing.

Hi all,
I'm having the aforementioned issue fairly often with Windows 7. It seems to happen when copying to network shares. It is more than annoying--it is literally stopping production at our company. I would really appreciate an realistic fix
for this--that is, one that isn't the catch-all "Reinstall windows".
Let me further state that it has nothing to do with hardware--I can reliably copy the same files in XP. It is a Windows 7/Explorer thing.
It also seems to be size-related--but I haven't had the time to do scientific testing to verify this. I know that if I'm copying an Access .mdb file from my development machine (Windows 7) to a client machine (mostly windows XP) with a mapped drive,
it seems to hang. But if I compact/repair the .mdb file and bring it from, say 25 meg to 12 meg, it seems to copy fine.
Worse, is that when it hangs, I'll finally hit "Cancel" after a few minutes, and then the entire Windows 7 locks!! I can't do anything until I ctrl-alt-del and kill the Explorer.exe process, which wipes out my desktop, etc, until Explorer.exe auto-starts.
This is such a huge problem that I have to think there's a fix upcoming.
Thanks,
--Jim

Hi,
May I know how it works if you copy files between local drives? Please also boot the system to Safe Mode with networking and check this issue.
In addition, may I know more information about the machine which hosts the share folder you mapped is located, a Windows based computer? Please also
let us know the operating system.
Based on my research, I would like to suggest the following:
1.
Try disabling Receive Side Scaling, Chimney Offload, and NetDMA support and see if it works:
Information about the TCP Chimney Offload, Receive Side
Scaling, and Network Direct Memory Access features in Windows Server 2008
2.
Also run the following commands in Windows 7:
netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled
netsh int ip set global taskoffload=disabled
3.
Try Robocopy:
Get to Know Robocopy for More Powerful File Management
For detail information about the usage of the Robocopy command, please also refer to:
Robocopy
Meanwhile, I would like to share the following with you for your reference:
Slow Large File Copy Issues
Windows Explorer and SMB Traffic
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Nicholas Li - MSFT
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Existing files on drive connected to latest Airport Extreme do not show up, however files copied over the air to the drive do. Any ideas?

I have the latest Airport Extreme with a Seagate drive connected. I copied files to the drive while it was connected to my MacBook Pro. The files do not show up when connected to the AE, but they appear when connected to the Macbook, Files copied over the network to the drive appear. The drive is formatted HFS+.

After playing with this for the last few days, I found a solution. Under the "Disks" tab in Airport Utility, the "Secure Shared Disks" drop down needs to be set to "With device password". Mine was set to "With acounts", which even after correct authentication, none of the files would appear.
Another interesting note: The files that I could see, the ones I copied over the network, do not appear now. I can copy over new files, and they show up, but the ones copied prior to changing the "Secure Shared Disks" option, do not.

File Copy times

My newsreader is acting funny and dropping posted messages, so I
apologize if this shows up twice.
My comments on the file speed are that the times posted by other just go
to show how difficult it sometimes is to make good timing measurements.
I suspect that the wide variations being posted are in large part to
disk caching. To measure this, you should either flush the caches each
time or run them multiple times to make sure that the cache affects them
more equally.
Here is what I'd expect. The LV file I/O is a thin layer built upon the
OS file I/O. Any program using file I/O will see that smaller writes
have somewhat more overhead than a few large writes. However, at some
size, either LV or the OS will break the larger writes into smaller
ones. The file I/O functions in general will be slower to read and
write contents than making a file copy using the copy node or move node.
Sorry if I can't be more specific, but if you have a task that
seems way to slow, please send it to technical support and report a
performance problem. If we can find a better implementation, we will
try to integrate it.
Greg McKaskle

Maybe this is because of the write buffer?
Try mounting the media using the -o sync option to have data written immediately.

How to measure progress of file copy?

One of the requirements for my AIR application is to copy
large files from one location to another on the client computer.
I've been using the copyToAsync() method in AIR, but unfortunately
this does not trigger progress events. Copying gigabyte files that
take several seconds becomes pretty uncomfortable for users, when
they can't see the progress.
Does anyone know of an alternative or workaround? All I need
to do is copy a file from one location to another, and measure the
progress while that is happening.
Since I control the client machines (it is a closed
environment), I have the option to setup file servers on every
machine and use the file download control with Flash instead of
file copy. However, when I investigate this option it seems that
the file download control will always trigger user interaction to
select the target path (which I don't want -- I want to
programatically select the source files and the target directory).
If someone knows a solution to that problem I would happily take it
and move on :)

Hi,
Use 2 FileStream objects in async mode (openAsync). One to
read and another to write. When you read in async mode, you get
progress events. When they fire, you can read bytesAvailable
amounts of data and write that to the output filestream.
The output filestream can listen for output_progress events
to ensure that new data can be written to it or not.

Network speed affected by large file copy operations. Also, why intermittent network outages?

Hi
I have a couple of issues on our company network.
The first is thate a single large file copy imapcts the entire network and dramatically reduces network speed and the second is that there are periodic outages where file open/close/save operations may appear to hang, and also where programs that rely on
network connectivity e.g. email, appear to hang. It is as though the PC loses it's connection to the network, but the status of the network icon does not change. For the second issue if we wait the program will respond but the wait period can be up to 1min.
The downside of this is that this affects Access databases on our server so that when an 'outage' occurs the Access client cannot recover and hangs permamnently.
We have a Windows Active Directory domain that comprises Windows 2003 R2 (soon to be decommissioned), Windows Server 2008 Standard and Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard domain controllers. There are two member servers: A file server running Windows 2008 Storage
Server and a remote access server (which also runs WSUS) running Windows Server 2012 Standard. The clients comprise about 35 Win7 PC's and 1 Vista PC.
When I copy or move a large file from the 2008 Storage Server to my Win7 client other staff experience massive slowdowns when accessing the network. Recently I was moving several files from the Storage Server to my local drive. The files comprised pairs
(e.g. folo76t5.pmm and folo76t5.pmi), one of which is less than 1MB and the other varies between 1.5 - 1.9GB. I was moving two files at a time so the total file size for each operation was just under 2GB.
While the file move operation was taking place a colleague was trying to open a 36k Excel file. After waiting 3mins he asked me for help. I did some tests and noticed that when I was not copying large files he could open the Excel file immediately. When
I started copying more data from the Storage Server to my local drive it took several minutes before his PC could open the Excel file.
I also noticed on my Win7 client that our email client (Pegasus Mail), which was the only application I had open at the time would hang when the move operation was started and it would take at least a minute for it to start responding.
Ordinarlily we work with many files
Anyone have any suggestions, please? This is something that is affecting all clients. I can't carry out file maintenance on large files during normal work hours if network speed is going to be so badly impacted.
I'm still working on the intermittent network outages (the second issue), but if anyone has any suggestions about what may be causing this I would be grateful if you could share them.
Thanks

What have you checked for resource usage during one of these copies of a large file?
At a minimum I would check Task Manager>Resource Monitor. In particular check the disk and network usage. Also, look at RAM and CPU while the copy is taking place.
What RAID level is there on the file server?
There are many possible areas that could be causing your problem(s). And it could be more than one thing. Start by checking these things. And go from there.
Hi, JohnB352
Thanks for the suggestions. I have monitored the server and can see that the memory is nearly maxed out with a lot of hard faults (varies between several hundred to several thousand), recorded during normal usage. The Disk and CPU seem normal.
I'm going to replace the RAM and double it up to 12GB.
Thanks! This may help with some other issues we are having. I'll post back after it has been done.
[Edit]
Forgot to mention: there are 6 drives in the server. 2 for the OS (Mirrored RAID 1) and 4 for the data (Striped RAID 5).

Does the last updated backup in Time Machine have all my files for "standard" file copy? (i want to copy and paste files to another computer that doesn't have TM)

My personal Macbook pro died, but I did have a Time Machine backup. I have a new iMac that I would like to use as a family computer. I would like to transfer some files to the new computer (and set-up a new Time Machine backup), but archive the remainder on a non-TM drive. I was planning to:
1. File copy my last backup folder from my old TM drive to the new computer
2. Copy (and then delete) the files I want to archive on another HD drive
3. Wipe clean my current TM drive
4. Set-up TM on my new computer
Is this a good way to proceed?
Is copying the last backup folder (vs. all backup folders) enough to move my files over?
Any better approaches appreciated!

I suggest you visit MicroCenter and go to there Apple section and ask one of there guys if they are still offering the 2 terabyte Backup For the iMac, Mine was only $100.00.
So the iMac has Time machine plus the USB 2 Terabyte Backup for less than your $130.00

File copying problems

Copying some files using the Finder results in a dialogue box error message: "The Finder cannot complete the opeeration because some data in +(file name)+ could not be read or written. (Error code -36). The same files copy without error when using SilverKeeper (v.2.0.2) backup program.
I am also experiencing a problem when quitting SIlverKeeper. A second or so after selecting Quit, and after the program has actually quit, a system dialogue box appears saying that the program has unexpectedly quit and offering choices of Reopen, Report to Apple or Close.
The system also seems somewhat sluggish.
Can anyone offer suggestions?

Hi John, At this point I think you should get Applejack...
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/19596
After installing, reboot holding down CMD+s, (+s), then when the DOS like prompt shows, type in...
applejack AUTO
Then let it do all 5 of it's things.
At least it'll eliminate some questions if it doesn't fix it.
The 6 things it does are...
Correct any Disk problems.
Repair Permissions.
Clear out Cache Files.
Repair/check several plist files.
Dump the VM files for a fresh start.
Trash old Log files.
First reboot will be slower, sometimes 2 or 3 restarts will be required for full benefit... my guess is files relying upon other files relying upon other files!
Disconnect the USB cable from any UPS so the system doesn't shut down in the middle of the process.

Is it possible to have media files copied to a new location as you import them into a project?

I have roughly 800gb of footage i've taken over the past 2 years of traveling, and I am making a single video montage... The files are located on an external drive, making them slower to work with. I have a 1tb ssd but not enough free space to copy all the files to it for sorting. What i want to do is have the files copy over to the SSD as i add them to the project, so that only the footage i'm going to use gets copied over to the SSD. The only way i can determine if i am going to use the footage or not is to scrub through and mark Ins and Outs in premiere...
So i guess my question, in the simplest terms i can ask is, Is there a setting in Premiere, like the project manager tool which allows you to consolidate used media files to one destination, but one that will consolidate files as you add them to the project? or could i do this manually by repeatedly using the project manager tool to consolidate files periodically?
Hope that makes sense...
Oh, and yes, i have considered other methods to my madness, like reviewing the footage outside of premiere before deciding if i will use it or not, frankly, i have over 4000 pieces of footage and it's just much faster to scrub through them in premiere than to open each one in vlc to review. It's also much more convenient to mark my ins and outs as i review the footage, so premiere is my only option.
Thanks!

You can easily (and better, IMHO) do what you want in Adobe Prelude. It's part of the CC subscription, and may have been included with CS6.
Open the Ingest panel, navigate to the external drive where you have your source clips, make the thumbnails in the Ingest panel comfortably large, click a video clip to enable scrubbing, and use the J-K-L keys to navigate playback through the clips. Put a check mark on the clips you want and be sure to select and set up the Transfer option on the right side of the panel before ingesting. Don't select the Transcode option.
Cheers,
Jeff

File copy speeds to CSV vs non-CSV

I'm working on bringing up a 2012 R2 cluster and doing a basic test. In this cluster, I have two adapters for iSCSI traffic, one for network traffic, and one for the heartbeat. Cluster node has all the current updates on it. Everything
is set up correctly as far as I can see. I'm taking a folder with 1GB of random files in it and copying it from the C: drive of a node to an iSCSI LUN. If I have the LUN set up as a non-CSV disk, the copy happens about three time faster than if
I have it set up as a CSV disk. All I'm doing is using FCM to change the disk from CSV to non-CSV (right-click, Remove from CSV, right-click, Add to CSV). I can swap it back and forth and each time the copy process is about three time slower when
it's a CSV. Am I missing something here? I've been through all the usual stuff with regard to the iSCSI adapters, MPIO, drivers, etc. But I don't think that would have anything to do with this anyway. The disk is accessed the same with
regard to all that whether it's CSV or not, unless I'm missing something. Right now, I only have a single node configured in the cluster, so it's definitely not anything to do with the CSV being in redirected mode.
I'm not trying to establish any particular transfer speed, I know file transfers are different than actual workloads and performance tools like iometer when it comes to actual numbers. But it seems to me like the transfers should be close
to the same whether the disk is a CSV or not, since I'm not changing anything else.

Which system owns the CSV? If the system from which you are copying does not own the CSV then all the metadata updates have to go across the network to be handled by the node that does own the CSV. If you are copying a lot of little
files, there is more metadata.
Actually, metadata updates always happen in redirected IO from what I'm reading, that has been the part that I was missing. This explains it.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj612868.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396 "When certain small changes occur in the file system on a CSV volume, this metadata must be synchronized on each of the physical nodes that access the
LUN, not only on the single coordinator node... These metadata update operations occur in parallel across the cluster networks by using SMB 3.0. "
So a file copy, even when done on a coordinator node, does the metadata updates in redirected mode. Other articles seem to say the same thing, though not always clearly. So it's still accurate to say that a file copy isn't the best way to measure
CSV performance, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of pointing to the (I think) important distinction regarding how the metadata updates work. From what I can see, that distinction is probably trumping anything else such as who is the
coordinator node, CSV cache, etc. For me anyway, it makes a 3X performance difference, so I think that's pretty significant.

Files copied (backed up) on an external hard drive can NOT be opened

MacBook Pro (2.5GHz, intel Core i5)
OS X Yosemite, 10.10.2
I was running low on storage space on my Mac Pro. I copied all items on Desktop to my external hard drive. After all files were copied from MacBook Pro to the external hard drive, "get info" suggested that the amount of space taken entirely was the same between when all items were on the Desktop and when they were on the external hard drive. The number of items copied over were also identical. I should have been more careful, but I then deleted all items from the Desktop. It was until a few days later (today) that I noticed majority of the files copied over onto the external disk can NOT be opened now. The error message was "The alias “<filename>” can’t be opened because the original item can’t be found.".
I really don't want to lose these files, but where are they? They got their file sizes correct but just can not be opened. I tried copying these files back to Desktop on my MacBook Pro, that's not helpful. I tried accessing the files on a PC, still can't open the files. I tried repairing disk of the external hard drive (under Disk Utility), still can't open the files. I tried repairing disk permissions of my MacBook Pro hard drive, still can't open the files.
One last thing I tried in terminal (I am not terminal savvy at all, just googled the "The alias..." error message and copied the instruction): /usr/bin/SetFile -a a /Volumes/MAC This did not solve the problem, either.
Thank you for your help in advance!

Hi, eddie from pataskala ohio.
We love pro-active thinking here at the Apple Discussions and you're off to a great start.
Even though upgrading iTunes shouldn't affect your Library, one of the funny things about computers is that sometime, somehow, somewhere when you least expect it , they can do some not so funny things, like losing data that they're not supposed to. Which is why it's a good idea to have a back up copy of any data (such as your music) that you value in reserve ... just in case.
The most straightforward way, is to go to the iTunes Edit menu > Preferences > Advanced tab > General sub-tab and make sure your iTunes Music folder is assigned to its default location: C:\Documents and Settings\User Name\My Documents\My Music\iTunes .
Next make sure all your music is stored in that folder by using the iTunes Advanced menu > Consolidate Library option.
Now you can copy the entire iTunes folder - the iTunes Music folder and the iTunes library files in particular - to your external drive.
If anything does go wrong with the upgrade, you'll be all set to recreate your Library.

File copied In production

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for