File size difference between version 3 and 4

I'd like to know how to publish a file at the smallest possible size with Captivate 4.
I have 1 file that is 9176KB published with Captivate 3. The same file published with Captivate 4 becomes 10300KB. I didn't add any functionality just publish it once saved in 4.
What is the same content ~1MB bigger with the new version? How do I make it smaller?
Thanks,

Thanks for the hint! It did make me revisit those files and now I see the reason for the small file sizes: The Apple Finder does note update the file size view once a file was added to a folder. Here's what I did:
Opened a folder full of .NEFs in detail view in Finder.
Converted them using DNG Converter
Looked at the sizes of the files as they were shown in the Finder window allready open.
Unfortunately, those file sizes are not correct. If I open a new Finder window of the same folder, file sizes are correctly reported as between 3.5 and 5 MB.

Similar Messages

File size difference between DNG Converter and Lightroom Beta 4

Hi,
I want to go the all-DNG route and am trying several things ATM. I want my files to be as small as possible, thus I disable previews and RAW embedding and enable compression in DNG Converter. In Lightroom, there are no options at all. What I do get, are pretty amazing file size differences:
Original .NEF as it came from my D70s: ~5MB
.DNG created by DNG Converter: ~1MB
.DNG created by Lightroom: ~4MB
The very small file size in DNG Converter is the one that bother's me most. I get these small files from time to time. I checked both the DNG and the NEF in Photoshop, and they seem to be identical. So my question is: What triggers these small file sizes? Do I loose anything? Or is the Lightroom DNG converter not as advanced as the stand alone version?
Maybe this helps: I get the ridicolous small files for very dull subjects that tell the computer scientist in me that it should be easily compressable by common compression algorithms.
Thanks for any pointers,
Markus

Thanks for the hint! It did make me revisit those files and now I see the reason for the small file sizes: The Apple Finder does note update the file size view once a file was added to a folder. Here's what I did:
Opened a folder full of .NEFs in detail view in Finder.
Converted them using DNG Converter
Looked at the sizes of the files as they were shown in the Finder window allready open.
Unfortunately, those file sizes are not correct. If I open a new Finder window of the same folder, file sizes are correctly reported as between 3.5 and 5 MB.

Difference Between version 8 and cs3/4 ?

Hi I have dreamweaver 8 and I use it for all my tasks related to website development.
I just wanted to know if there is any significant difference between version 8 and cs3/4 ?
Suggestions appreciated.

I don't think any of those you have listed are major additions to my own personal workflow in my opinion David.
Nice add-ons but it's not like 'I really need this'.
I'd like a better computer each and every year but I can still do all I need with the one I have. Of course you never want to go back once you upgrade but its not as if you can't do what is needed with an older version.
Improved css rendering? I struggle to find an improvement apart from maybe overflow:hidden; I guess it may also be down to the way you write the css. I've never really struggled with css rendering from version MX onwards, others have.
Built in css layouts? I wouldn't touch those with a barge pole personally. They can remain in the domain of the inexperienced and when they come to alter them they are so complicated they won't have a clue where to start.
Spry widgets? Again overcomplicated and used mainly by inexperienced users.
Live view/live code? Personally have no use for it.
None of those you listed would effect my workflow. But as I said it's best to download a trial and take it for a spin.
DW in my opinion doesn't have much more in the way of development to offer apart from incorporating elements which are non-essential. Its a bit like the progress of all their software; they struggle with each new release to find anything wortwhile to include.

What are the differences between version 9 and X of the Reader?

I have been running various releases of Version 9 of the Adobe Reader for a long time. I have noticed that when there is an update available for Version 9 and I click on the "more information" button on the update, it takes me to a web page where there is information on the latest levels of both Version 9 and Version X, but I cannot find any information on what the differences are between version 9 and X. I read the FAQ and found nothing on this, and I even searched this forum and was surprised that there were no topics on this question already.
Can someone tell me the differences between the 2 versions. I am running Windows 7; is that important as to which version of Reader I should use?

http://www.adobe.com/products/reader.html
http://blogs.adobe.com/asset/2010/07/introducing-adobe-reader-protected-mode.html
Both Adobe Reader 9 and Adobe Reader X work on Windows 7 .
Hope this helps.

Difference between Version 20 and 21.0.025

Hi,
I want to know what is the deffence between version 20 and 21. i.e what are the new updates/improvements in version 21.

Which phone do you mean?

File size differences between Acrobat 5.0 and Acrobat 8.0

We have a system where we incorporate .pdf files into word documents. When we use v8.0 the .pdf files suddenly become very much larger (e.g. the word document containing the v5.0 PDFs, around 29 of them, is 1,224kb but is 2,376kb when we use v8.0 PDFs). The .PDF's are created by printing to PDF995 and then using Acrobat to open them, select a section of the page, and copy/paste them into the Word document.
Has anyone come across this before and, if so, how do we tune v8.0?

Thank you for the quick response. We are able to get some results through the Optimizer however they are not the same. Also we would like to keep from adding an extra step into the process. Especially a step that adds a lot of time to the process as the Optimizer does. In versions 7 and 8 we did not have run the Optimizer (we also did not have to do this in version 5 back in the day). Why would 9 have to add this step? I am really looking for a way to keep the same workflow steps. -Dan

File size differences between cp3 and cp4

Hello
I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
swf file size was 305kb.
but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
in two sample setting is default.
Thanks for any help.

Hello
I created a cp file in captivate4 & import audio file (mp3) & published it.
swf file size was 305kb.
but when I created this file in cptivate3 & published it swf file size was 260kb.
why swf file size in cptivate3 less than cptivate4?
in two sample setting is default.
Thanks for any help.

File size differences between JE 3.3.87 and

Our application when using JE 4.1.17 builds a database that is 3.5 times larger than when using JE 3.3.87.
Is this expected? Is there anything we can do with 4.1.17 to build smaller file size DB?
Chuck Koscher

I also ran DbPrintLog on the partial 4.1.17 built Db (gona take more time to run on the ver 3 DB). What does this all mean?
[qs@cr3 bin]$ more DbPrintLog.out
<DbPrintLog>
Log statistics:
type total provisional total min max avg entries
count count bytes bytes bytes bytes as % of log
LN 1,641,390 0 635,530,086 37 38,103 387 35.8
MapLN 39,660 0 129,537,451 50 5,377 3,266 7.3
NameLN 5 0 426 35 111 85 0
DupCountLN 31,568 84 891,783 22 32 28 0.1
FileSummaryLN 2,978,385 0 203,225,292 28 38,130 68 11.5
IN 176,586 16,952 281,957,554 44 9,735 1,596 15.9
BIN 216,441 64,082 356,220,165 44 10,188 1,645 20.1
DIN 40,046 2,111 22,350,697 85 5,425 558 1.3
DBIN 42,555 2,907 143,815,258 71 10,146 3,379 8.1
Root 168 0 452,371 123 3,719 2,692 0
CkptStart 68 0 2,101 29 31 30 0
CkptEnd 66 0 4,179 57 64 63 0
BINDelta 175 0 17,715 35 1,507 101 0
DupBINDelta 22 0 3,996 51 1,361 181 0
Trace 450 0 69,440 46 305 154 0
FileHeader 178 0 6,764 38 38 38 0
key/data 578,081,436 (32.6)
Total bytes in portion of log read: 1,774,085,278
Total number of entries: 5,167,763
Per checkpoint interval info:
lnTxn ln mapLNTxn mapLN end-end end-start start-end maxLNReplay ckpt
End
0 6 0 3 10,016,254 10,002,932 13,322 6 0x2/0x3f7
e
0 21,291 0 209 20,537,114 20,353,908 183,206 21,294 0x10/0x87
198
0 10,557 0 141 10,187,476 10,044,801 142,675 10,723 0x14/0xb4
dec
0 41,526 0 900 46,753,313 46,610,643 142,670 41,612 0x203/0x7
25a0d
0 35,418 0 711 41,367,099 41,354,438 12,661 35,538 0x314/0x8
73648
0 7,992 0 187 9,537,017 9,521,859 15,158 7,992 0x349/0x8
025c1
0 10,424 0 185 10,332,196 10,238,081 94,115 10,426 0x34f/0x8
53765
0 10,467 0 216 10,123,100 10,110,090 13,010 10,562 0x353/0x8
71841
0 8,814 0 190 10,170,639 10,012,047 158,592 8,816 0x355/0x8
9b2d0
0 20,157 0 585 24,985,565 24,896,315 89,250 20,233 0x3d2/0x3
d2f2d
0 8,614 0 197 10,266,414 10,227,891 38,523 8,681 0x3da/0x4
13fdb
0 29,407 0 709 34,661,770 34,645,633 16,137 29,408 0x45a/0x8
861e5
0 8,512 0 203 10,694,331 10,622,804 71,527 8,513 0x46a/0x9
2fa20
0 17,131 0 349 20,149,317 20,118,102 31,215 17,153 0x470/0x9
54165
0 50,120 0 1,106 56,983,602 56,958,921 24,681 50,120 0x533/0x6
73a97
0 16,608 0 418 20,484,484 20,467,444 17,040 16,619 0x53f/0x6
e9f1b
0 16,920 0 395 20,846,145 20,819,500 26,645 16,920 0x557/0x7
b885c
0 9,033 0 219 10,860,030 10,834,496 25,534 9,037 0x56f/0x8
8a7da
0 68,165 0 1,762 90,245,785 90,214,129 31,656 68,168 0x68e/0x8
c67f3
0 9,140 0 200 9,904,174 9,827,759 76,415 69,294 0x800/0x8
af1a1
0 9,032 0 215 10,299,639 10,201,642 97,997 9,095 0x80a/0x8
f8418
0 66,535 0 1,462 75,431,349 75,410,311 21,038 66,600 0x880/0x4
9cdcd
0 8,504 0 222 10,680,253 10,659,337 20,916 8,507 0x896/0x5
42f0a
0 17,543 0 632 20,080,030 20,050,546 29,484 17,546 0x89a/0x5
567a8
0 25,548 0 617 32,433,830 32,368,958 64,872 25,564 0x8d6/0x7
a8ace
0 9,710 0 238 10,564,761 10,547,253 17,508 9,728 0x8ee/0x8
328e7
0 21,166 0 884 26,557,127 26,363,082 194,045 21,167 0x93f/0x4
ea02e
0 133,812 0 2,755 133,366,171 133,318,671 47,500 133,887 0xb95/0x8
1fd49
0 39,793 0 844 41,359,213 41,308,651 50,562 134,394 0xbbf/0x9
6bab6
0 56,793 0 1,231 52,693,165 52,642,716 50,449 56,796 0xc0a/0x2
73c63
0 26,444 0 418 23,694,267 23,628,234 66,033 26,503 0xc1a/0x5
f9b1e
0 23,730 0 459 22,482,062 22,376,959 105,103 23,790 0xc52/0x8
57aac
0 10,907 0 264 10,299,749 10,258,468 41,281 10,980 0xc5c/0x8
a0d91
0 102,960 0 2,034 86,930,064 86,899,807 30,257 102,963 0xddc/0x5
b35a1
0 24,590 0 483 21,204,153 21,176,604 27,549 24,594 0xdf6/0x6
d955a
0 11,364 0 281 11,142,812 11,074,749 68,063 11,366 0xe06/0x7
f0576
0 12,678 0 230 10,256,884 10,224,320 32,564 12,697 0xe0c/0x8
2f0ea
0 23,613 0 434 20,392,697 20,349,744 42,953 23,728 0xe16/0x8
8eee3
0 10,843 0 182 10,415,971 10,370,611 45,360 10,964 0xe20/0x8
f47c6
0 8,959 0 274 10,281,193 10,168,378 112,815 8,959 0xe24/0x9
3922f
0 10,454 0 235 10,273,473 10,202,560 70,913 10,563 0xe2c/0x9
7be70
0 39,113 0 945 36,005,999 35,971,748 34,251 39,193 0xe56/0x5
accdf
0 33,194 0 840 32,108,563 31,996,817 111,746 33,195 0xe8a/0x7
af972
0 31,440 0 556 28,736,169 28,605,453 130,716 31,530 0xedb/0x6
7b09b
0 9,723 0 265 10,446,985 10,392,967 54,018 9,840 0xee9/0x6
e82a4
0 8,672 0 280 10,230,643 10,179,976 50,667 8,788 0xeef/0x7
20797
0 10,486 0 279 11,046,145 10,958,538 87,607 10,491 0xf09/0x8
1fe18
0 19,908 0 417 20,242,451 20,187,638 54,813 19,948 0xf11/0x8
5b12b
0 10,081 0 302 10,045,293 10,023,247 22,046 10,081 0xf13/0x8
66218
0 9,882 0 235 10,053,363 10,004,937 48,426 9,882 0xf15/0x8
7328b
0 150,847 0 3,196 158,056,449 157,994,966 61,483 150,927 0xf90/0x6
98a8c
0 17,077 0 535 20,280,697 20,210,452 70,245 17,080 0xf98/0x6
dd305
0 24,492 0 778 30,374,091 30,330,071 44,020 24,540 0xfa2/0x7
38850
0 16,047 0 484 20,187,429 20,127,635 59,794 16,216 0xfa8/0x7
66475
0 17,957 0 587 20,203,041 20,178,620 24,421 18,022 0xfae/0x7
97d96
0 18,655 0 545 20,290,674 20,201,008 89,666 18,655 0xfb4/0x7
ded08
0 20,961 0 680 30,230,987 30,091,976 139,011 20,964 0xfb8/0x8
17353
0 8,873 0 258 10,075,979 10,001,445 74,534 8,983 0xfba/0x8
29c1e
0 13,760 0 566 20,103,639 20,001,262 102,377 13,760 0xfbc/0x8
430f5
0 22,711 0 1,061 30,151,192 30,123,976 27,216 22,775 0xfc0/0x8
67f8d
0 18,003 0 569 20,054,235 20,000,730 53,505 18,005 0xfc2/0x8
75368
0 17,262 0 555 20,054,765 20,012,053 42,712 17,268 0xfc4/0x8
82955
0 12,110 0 631 20,074,663 20,004,423 70,240 12,156 0xfc6/0x8
94cfc
0 19,100 0 511 20,029,210 20,000,131 29,079 19,180 0xfc8/0x8
9bf16
0 14,124 0 732 20,052,653 20,011,165 41,488 14,127 0xfca/0x8
a8cc3
0 17,306 0 447 20,048,350 20,005,522 42,828 17,309 0xfcc/0x8
b49a1
0 4,326 0 127 5,187,590 5,187,590 0 4,326 0xfcd/0x4
1db27
</DbPrintLog>
[qs@cr3 bin]$

File size problem between Acrobat 8 and 9

When I print to a PDF from Acrobat 8 I get a file size that is slightly larger than the original PDF file size. Example a 1.6 mb file becomes a 1.7mb file. When I print the same file in Acrobat 9 with the same settings (to my Knowledge) (setting = High Quality Print) I get a file that 36.1mb.
The reason we would print the file in the fist place is that we need to create a PDF that is ether slightly larger or slightly smaller (say 98%) of the original size. Can anyone help us figure out why our upgraded version 9 would do this? We also use 7 and between 7 and 8 there are no defenses but 9 makes the file ~21X the original file size. Please see that attached JPEG for a screen shot of the file sizes.
Thank you, -Dan

Thank you for the quick response. We are able to get some results through the Optimizer however they are not the same. Also we would like to keep from adding an extra step into the process. Especially a step that adds a lot of time to the process as the Optimizer does. In versions 7 and 8 we did not have run the Optimizer (we also did not have to do this in version 5 back in the day). Why would 9 have to add this step? I am really looking for a way to keep the same workflow steps. -Dan

File format differences between Illustrator CS2 and CS3

Does anyone know the difference between the file format of Adobe Illustrator CS2 and CS3? Is there a document that documents this? Can someone send a link? The reason I am asking is that I have written a plug-in which saves the current CS3 document back down to CS2 so that users who are still using Adobe Illustrator CS2 can open it. However, if the same document is opened by a CS3 user, what objects, constructs or data structures are likely to be lost because the file has be converted down to CS2? Most things seem to be retained and I have yet to find a problem but if yo save manually from CS3 to CS2, Illustrator puts up a warning stating "Saving to a legacy format may cause some changes to your text layout and disable some editing features when the document is read back in". Does anyone have any more detail on this?
Thank you

There are new features in CS 3 as opposed t CS 2 and the text engine has been improved some what in CS 3. If you have text on a path that is say curved you are going to see a loss in the spacing and way it is oriented. fixed in CS 4.
I forget some of the new features in CS 3 what was not a feature in CS 2 will be flattened when saved back.
Or the feature will simply not be available.

Huge cube size difference between version 7.1 and 11.1

Hello All,
We are migrating from version 7.1 to 11.1. We did a full data export of each cube on 7.1 and did a server load on 11.1. We found that all the cubes on the new 11.1 server are almost 50% in size compare to same cube on 7.1 server. We did a detailed drill through and found that the there isn't any data loss on the cubes on the latest server. Please let us know if this smaller cube size is normal or did we miss something somewhere? I appreciate your comments!!!
Thanks!

Your cube was probably really fragmented and reloading all the data will have reduced the fragmentationYup. You can prove this by taking those export files and recreating the database on your 7.1.x server. I'll bet you find the same thing.
Take a gander at this post re fragmentation.
I'd add to that posting that MaxL's force restructure is another way to defrag a database; I personally like the flat file export as I can be reasonably sure backup software won't choke on a flat file.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Discrepancies in total file size report between v$asm_file and dba_data_files

Hi Friends,
I have an issue, where there are differences of around (70 GB - 90 GB) between what v$asm_file is reporting and what dba_data_files reports. (I have taken TEMP files into account as dba_data_files does not report TEMP files), but still there are differences. Does any one know why is that ? I have checked two RAC installations and its the same in both of them.
Regarsd,
Rose

Can you give the output of :
select * from dba_data_files;
select * from v$asm_file;

Is there a size difference between Iphone 4 and Iphone 4S?

I want to buy a phone case for my IPhone 4, but, the case i want is only sold in size IPhone4S.
Do you think if i bought a 4S case for a 4, it would fit?
The only difference i believe there is between the phones, is that the volume buttons are slightly moved, will that matter?

That would depend on the case and iPhone 4 model. The buttons and mute switch on the iPhone 4 ATT model are located a little bit different than the iPhone 4S. The locations on the Verizon iPhone 4 and the iPhone 4S are the same. Most cases for the iPhone 4 and 4S now are designed to accommodate both setups, so chances are you won't have a problem. If you have an ATT iPhone make sure the case has slots for the volume buttons and mute switch rather than small holes for the buttons and switch.

Partition Size difference between Disk Utility and Finder

I installed a new hard drive in my MacBook Pro (2.33ghz late 2006). The new drive is 320gb.
In Disk Utility it shows up correctly as a single partition (297.65GB). However, when I hit command+I in finder on the disk it shows its size as 176.88GB - a 120GB difference.
Anyone any idea what the problem could be?
Thanks
Shay
PS I used to have a bootcamp partition on the drive but have removed it, maybe this has something to do with it.

In DU is it showing the size of the DRIVE or the partition on the drive?
I'd clone the partition you have to an external and then repartition and reformat that drive to get it all back to one partition. How big was the boot camp partition?

WHAT IS THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VERSIONS 7 AND 9

.

Version 9 does not support CAPS LOCK:-)
Readme files at
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10530_01/doc/nav/portal_1.htm
will answer your question.

File size difference between version 3 and 4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for