File size different in LR than in "file info"

After cropping an image (36MB) and doing some adjustments and then saving as a standard JPEG - high quality - I go back into LR and the new image shows it's 10.2 MB. When I quit LR and do a "get file info" on the same file it tells me that the image is 1.2 MB's. What gives?

Based only on what is included above, I would guess that the 36MB file was in RAW format which you then converted to a JPEG. Would that be correct? Going from 36MB to 12MB just doing a conversion to JPEG is not all that unusual. If you set up your camera to record both a RAW and a JPEG image for the same photo, you would see this sort of radical size difference because the lossy compression algorithms used in the conversion to JPEG will often just throw out up to 2/3 of your image data. The typical dSLR will record data at 12-bit or 14-bit color and Lightroom internally stores a RAW image at 16-bit color depth. A JPEG uses only an 8-bit color depth so there goes most of your data. Another thing to check is what resolution you used when you did the conversion. By default, the conversion is set up for screen which uses a resolution of 72-ppi. Great for display on the typical monitor but not much else. You will want to use at least 240-ppi for printing and 300-ppi for anything else.
Finally, unless you are intending to either send the photos to a web server or print them, I would not recommend converting them to JPEG. There is a massive loss of image data that is incurred and then, each time you save the image, it is compressed again and even more image data is lost. After the third compression, your JPEG image is pretty much useless as the quality is so bad. I convert my RAW images to DNG (my personal preference) and they are archived that way. When I am ready to print an image or send it to a web site, I export the image as a JPEG and store it separately, outside of my catalog though I will create a new collection for the image(s) or add them to an existing one so I know the status of the image but I always maintain the original in a RAW format.

Similar Messages

  • Why is menu size so much larger than the files?

    I am somewhat perplexed - I'm making a single-layer dvd and have a simple single screen theme (no animation) - it has one drop zone. The movie has 28 chapters so there are five of them, but so far I've added only one montage of photos to each menu page - it's a "mobile" quality in media browser and ave only 10 - 20 MB, then one song. On average these movie clips are 1:00 to 2:00 min long and the music is cut to that length. So, all told, it's probably less than 110 MB in files - but when I look at the project properties, the menus are 3301 MB!!!
    The movie itself is only 1.1 GB so what is going on?
    It's preventing me from doing the project and I've got no idea why it's making the menu size so much larger than the file sizes?
    Can you please help me figure out what to do?
    Alexa

    The 2 min clips were natively 2 min - I had each one separate and actually converted to media browser in "mobile" size (b/c the drop zone was 4 x 6 in size in the theme). They were tiny - in most cases I was shortening the audio (e.g. the song was 4 minutes and I was setting the loop to only 1:30 b/c that's how long the video clip was on the menu).
    BUT, to resolve the question (I always like to post the answer) - I ended up duplicating the project to try to reimport the video. It was a fresh iDVD project and I happened to click on the project tree of screens - and, lo and behold, the ENTIRE menu was duplicated for some reason (and the movie, actually). I went back to the original and it was the same! I have no idea how that would happen do you? It only had one main menu screen - and then an entire duplicate menu - which I wouldn't even know how to access if I didn't see it in the project menu tree?
    The only think of is that at one point I added a title menu link to the scene selection - it gave me a warning that my menu was more than 12 minutes, did I want to fix or ignore and fix later - which confused me b/c it was under 12 min, then but I clicked ignore. Does that create an alternate title menu and send people back to something else?
    Anyway, I deleted the entire extra scene selection menus (5 of them) and it was back to under 4 GB.
    So, I was able to burn, but still wondering about creating the "title menu" link on scene selections? It drives me crazy that it doesn't automatically do that so I like to add "main menu" links.
    Thanks for your help!
    Alexa

  • When I save a photo as a jpeg in PE 13 the file size is much smaller than with PE 12. Why?

    when I save a photo as a jpeg in PE 13 the file size is much smaller than with PE 12. Why?

    Are the image all the same size the % files open into a document seems to vary with the number of pixels the image being opened has.  Check the Image size.

  • Reduce File Size and Optimise PDF both increase file size

    Hi All
    I have exported a pdf (our college mag) at smallest file size from Indesign CS4 for online use. The problem is the resultant file size is a little under 19Mb. Using both or either Reduce File Size or Optimise functions simply result in an increase to 22Mb. The document is packed with images however I would have thought one or both of these processes would have helped reduce the file size to a more manageable download file size.
    A pdf is also produced to go to print so simply compressing all images prior to imcuding them in Indesign is not a preferable option - this would mean creating two separate Indesign documents, something which I would rather avoid if possible.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated as always.
    The file reside here if anyone cares to take a look http://www.ayrcoll.ac.uk/index.php?name=UpDownload&req=viewdownload&cid=11&orderby=dateD  It's the latest release (September 09)
    Thanks
    Colin

    You might want to do an audit of the PDF (button in PDF Optimizer) and try to figure out what the various parts are. It shows 58% is content streams (sorry, but I am not sure what that is), 26% is overhead, and only 12.7% is graphics. Since you are not storing bookmarks and such, you might want to try going back to ID and printing to the Adobe PDF printer for a comparison. It may be one technique is more efficient than the other.
    When I used the optimizer, the file did get larger. When I used Reduce File Size, it got slightly smaller. The key may be in figuring out what the various parts are from the audit. You might try copying one page of ID to a new document and play with various versions - different fonts (all were embedded and that is probably best), variations on graphics, etc. That is all I can suggest since I would simply be playing with different ways to produce the document and looking at what is causing the bloat. When the Images are only 12.7% and the fonts less than 1%, there is something going on to produce the size, and those 2 are typically the killers. I would mention tags that tend to bloat, but you do not have any (normally used for assessibility).
    You might want to try some of the preflight checks to find issues. I did the transparency check and got 170 instances in 22 pages. Flattening the page may help. There were some pages that seemed to be very bad. However, I did not get a big file size reduction. I did not get a lot of improvement by printing to a new PDF either. Certain pages seem to be part of the bloat problem. The print took a long time around pages 11 and 22.
    One troubleshooting technique would be extract pages to separate files and look at the details of each page to see what is causing the issue.
    Need to go. Good luck.

  • Software Update File Size Different than Apple Downloads File Size

    Background:
    I am running software update and it retrieves the update for "MacBook, MacBook Pro Software update 1.1" File size is listed as 768K. When I go to the Apple Downloads page for this update, the file size is 979K.
    Download ID is 16618 and URl is http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/macosx_updates/macbookmacbookprosoft wareupdate11.html
    Question:
    Is this discrepancy normal based on the way that Software Update calculates file size or should I be concerned? There is no hash to confirm integrity of the file.

    File size, and the volume of space it takes up are 2 different things. Space will very from computer to computer. Chances are, the larger the drive the more space it takes up. Reason? The file system (HSF + on macs with Leopard). The file sytem divides the drive into specific number of sections. That number may be 10 M, say. So, even if you have a thumbnail that is 4 kb, it will still require the minimum size of the file system. Make sense? There is a lot of wasted space on very large drives.
    Note: Leopard is set up to use a new file system that apple may soon adopt. It will not use the division method HFS + uses, and so will save a lot of space, if adopted.

  • File sizes different on iPhone compared to iTunes

    Hi everyone,
    After re-syncing my phone the file sizes compared to what was showing on the colored bar at the bottom of iPhone tab in iTunes is much different than the actual sizes of the files synced onto my phone. Basically I added all of the file sizes of my apps on my phone with a calculator and got 1.05gbs but highlighting the Apps section on the colored bar it shows 3.44gbs(see photo). My music adds up to 3.63gbs but shows 4.73gbs on the colored bar.
    Now I can understand adding lyrics, album art & whatnot may change the music file size but I can't see how profiles, scores on games or whatever can add an additional 2.4gbs to my apps. Any idea on what's up with this?

    I have found the iTunes "Memory Bar" to be an estimate and also not too sure it is always the same picture-in-time as the iPhone data.  Do you have (forgive the pun) and Apples to Apples comparison of each App you are counting?  I share an Apple ID and iTunes with my granddaughter and as such I don't actually keep all the Apps on my iPhone that show up in iTunes. 

  • Encoded file sizes different on two Macs

    We've just encoded a file to MPEG2 and the encoded file on Mac 1 is 1.58 GB and I've received it on Mac 2 via DropBox and the file is now 1.7 GB.
    Can anybody explain why this is?

    Does it play the same on both machines?
    If so, don't worry about it. File sizes are reported differently based upon
    a. the hard drive sector size. Smaller sector sizes means less wasted space in less than full sectors.
    and/or
    b. how the OS reports MB. - iirc, OS. 10.6 uses 1000 kb to the MB - while 10.5 uses 1024.
    x

  • Why is jpeg file size different in CS 5 and Photoshop CC?

    If I open a jpeg file in both CS5 and Photoshop CC, and then "save" the files, the file from CC is much smaller than the file from CS5.
    The size and compression ratios are the same, but the file size is different.  (It is about 1/2 the size).

    Bridge does not compress any files whatsoever. Bridge is not an image editor, it's nothing but a browser that hands the files to their respective applications. Bridge does not "open" or "save" files, it can't compress them in any shape or form.
    What you are seeing is the difference between the opened, uncompressed file in RAM and the space the file occupies on disk once
    Photoshop has saved and compressed it.
    The Bridge cache has nothing to do with any of this.

  • Time Capsule or OSX? File size differations....

    So i have my music library on my 500GB time capsule.
    i also have it backed up to two different 1TB harddrives (they all report the same amount of files and size)
    each 1TB states there are 159.23GB space used by the Music folder with 184 Folders
    the 500GB time capsule states: 93.68GB of space used with the same amount of folders.
    I did an individual file size check of every folder on each drive using the optcmdI and they all reported the same size.
    is there anyway to figure out why this stating differing file sizes?
    Time Capsule
    1TB drive

    How are the 1 TB drives formatted?
    Depending on the format and the size of the smallest allocation unit on the drive, a 1 byte file could take up 2 kbytes, 4 kbytes, or whatever. Therefore the amount of disk space used is going to vary depending on type of format used. If you want to really compare the files you would need to use the size of the file not the amount of disk space used by the file. If you notice when you check the size of an item in the Finder it states "xxxx bytes on disk (yyy bytes)". The "xxxx" is always the same as or bigger than the "yyy".

  • My jpeg file sizes are much larger than they used to be.

    Just recently the file sizes on my .jpeg files have become excessively larger than they used to be just a week or so ago. Where I used to go almost a week to need to archive to DVD a bunch of saved images, I've now got to save to DVD almost daily.
    For example, a 300x300 pixel image which shoud be about 32 Kb reads 383 Kb in the finder. I'm not doing anything to these images, just draging and droping.
    Where I used to get 7 K files on a DVD, I'm now getting less than 2 K files to each disc.
    Any thoughts on what's changed and how to fix it?

    What App & JPEG compression rating are you using, some apps can reduce file size by dropping colors for instance...

  • File size larger in Photoshop than in windows preview

    When I preview an image in windows, the properties panel says my file is only 958KB with dimensions 2400 x 2369. But when I open the file in photoshop (I have CS6) , it says my file is over 16MB with the same dimensions. What is going on?

    The file content will be compressed, making the file smaller than the uncompressed image size being reported by Photoshop.
    Photoshop is telling you the quantity of bytes consumed by a composite of the document it has open: 2400 px * 2369 px * 3 channels (R,G and B) * 8 bytes per channel = 16MB.

  • Using the Premiere pro CC 2014 exported media file size is much larger than estimate, also is so much bigger than Premiere CS 6?

    I used the preset H,264 Youtube 1080HD to export a video. The estimate size is 7308 MB {after I reduce the nitrate). The final size is 11.18 GB.
    Why is so much different? Befor I Use the Premiere CS6 to export a simial size use the same format Is around 6GB.

    First of all, the estimated file size just an estimate based chiefly on the combination of the bitrate and duration. The actual size can vary significantly, depending in large part on the amount of change from frame to frame throughout the video. For example, if you encode two clips of identical duration to exactly the same settings, the only difference being the nature of the content--say on is a talking head interview shot with the camera locked down on a tripod while the other is skateboarding footage that was shot handheld--the size of two resulting outputs files will be widely divergent.
    As to the comparison between CS6 and CC2014, note that the settings for some presets have been changed. For instance, the h.264 YouTube 1080 presets went from 8Mbps to 16.

  • File size different in Bridge CS3 and Photoshop

    I'm using PS CS3 and Bridge CS3 on a Macbook Pro. I have about 40 files that are about 50MB when opened in PS. In Bridge, under the thumbnails, the file size is pretty close to that, sometimes the exact amount, sometimes off by a couple/few MBs. I've been told this is due to some compression "on the disk" by Bridge. All the files are PSDs, by the way, and they are all flattened.
    What I don't understand is why just a *few* files that are 50MB in PS are showing up MUCH smaller in Bridge; e.g., 36MB. If it's due to compression, why would Bridge compress just a few files so much?
    I'm wondering if this has to do with the cached thumbnails, and maybe the thumbnails aren't showing the latest version (with accurate size) of the file. I don't know much about the cache, and I'm afraid to "purge the cache" without knowing anything about it. Also, if it has to do with preferences, I'm don't really know about that, either.

    Bridge does not compress any files whatsoever. Bridge is not an image editor, it's nothing but a browser that hands the files to their respective applications. Bridge does not "open" or "save" files, it can't compress them in any shape or form.
    What you are seeing is the difference between the opened, uncompressed file in RAM and the space the file occupies on disk once
    Photoshop has saved and compressed it.
    The Bridge cache has nothing to do with any of this.

  • MPEG -2 Blu-Ray more accurate file size reading in Encore than H.264 Blu-Ray???

    Hi,
    I just read on Kenstone.com that if you encode a MPEG-2 Blu-Ray instead of an H.264 Blu-Ray, Encore will give you a much closer and more accurate file size reading.
    Is this true?
    Encore CS 5.1

    EdwurdAdam wrote:
    Hi,
    I just read on Kenstone.com that if you encode a MPEG-2 Blu-Ray instead of an H.264 Blu-Ray, Encore will give you a much closer and more accurate file size reading.
    Is this true?
    Encore CS 5.1
    They are all guesses anyway.
    H264 will get you more on the disc, as it is a much more efficient codec. Same quality in MPEG-2 will be twice the size, roughly.

  • IMovie 11 file size differs from the size it becomes in iDVD

    I've made a movie in iMovie 11, and the file size in the finder information window says that it is 667MB, but when I sent it to iDVD it was too big for a single dvd.  What are my options?  Really would rather not have to chop things out...

    Just to clarify, and to add to zyfert's advice, the Best Performance encoding setting allows a duration up to one hour only, including themes and menus, for a single layer DVD. High Quality and Professional Quality give you up to 2 hours (as mentioned by Lennart). But to maintain optimum quality, it's probably best not to exceed your current project duration of 95 minutes (you may need an extra few minutes for menus).
    I appreciate that all this can be inferred from Lennart's and zyfert's excellent advice, but just wanted to expand on it a little.
    John

Maybe you are looking for

  • BUG: Power Manager fails to autostart

    Alright, this topic is a continuation of my conversation with Lenovo support on Twitter, as it has been a while and we were unable to resolve this problem. Until recently I had Windows 7 x86 running perfectly normal with a number of ThinkVantage tool

  • Please..need help in listSelctionListener....

    hi all. y do i get this error? pilihPetua.java:13: cannot resolve symbol symbol : class ListSelectionListener location: class pilihPetua public class pilihPetua extends JFrame implements ActionListener, ItemListener,ListSelectionListener{ pilihPetua.

  • Why does the apple icon come on then off then a white screen appears?

    Why does the apple icon come on then off then a white screen appears? 

  • Socket connection, byte array

    I've got a problem with byte array. It needs to be initialized f.e. byte[] data = new byte[100];However, I'm gonna read input stream to that array is.read(data);and input stream might be longer than expected f.e. 1000 bytes. What can I do to predict

  • Unexpected error from Microsoft HTML compiler.

    when trying to complie my .mpj file into Microsoft HTML help, I get the following error message Unexpected error from Microsoft HTML compiler. any ideas about what to do to get my compiler to work properly?