File to Idoc Scenario. Pls advice
Hi All,
I have implemented File to Idoc Scenario and it worked fine.
I have 2 doubts:
My Scenario: File -- XI -- R/3 system named D01
1. In Configuration: In Receiver Aggrement why we put
XI Business System name in Sender Service?
2. In Configuration when I open my R/3 Business system
(D01CLNT100) and click on Adapter Specfic Identifiers I can
see my Logical System Name as D01CLNT100.
When I use SALE tx. in D01 R/3 system I can see
D01CLNT100 as logical system
Question: If I use SALE transaction and change my
logical system name to "test" , do I need to change the
name "test" in SLD and then for R/3 Business system
(D01CLNT100) in Adapter Specfic Identifiers I will see new
Logical System Name as test.
Regards
Hi,
Question: If I use SALE transaction and change my logical system name to "test" , do I need to change the name "test" in SLD and then for R/3 Business system (D01CLNT100) in Adapter Specfic Identifiers I will see new Logical System Name as test
Yes , you need to Update the name in SLD and just Do SLD Data Cache in ID-- Environment to reflect the same name in Identifiers place.
>>1. In Configuration: In Receiver Aggrement why we put XI Business System name in Sender Service?
You might have used XI as Sender and you might have placed the file in XI Server to pickup.
Thats why you are using Xi's Business System name as Sender Serveice.
Regards
Seshagiri
Similar Messages
-
Flat Files to IDOC . Pls advice
Hi,
At source side there is batch of many files.
I need to map to IDOC at destination side.
Pls send me docs/blogs for the scenario
RegardsCollecting and Bundling vendor records from different multiple interfaces (file system,Peoplesoft ) and sending to SAP-R/3 system.
Collecting and Bundling vendor records from different multiple interfaces (file system,Peoplesoft ) and sending to SAP-R/3 system. part-1 //part-1
Collecting and Bundling vendor records from different multiple interfaces (file system,Peoplesoft ) and sending to SAP-R/3 system. part-2 //Part 2
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible //Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, itu2019s possible
IDOCs (Multiple Types) Collection in BPM //N:1 mapping -
Lookup issue for File to Idoc scenario-- Urgent Pls.
Hi All,
Iam doing File to IDoc scenario with one file --> any of 3 R/3 systems.
Routing has to be done dynamically using a lookup file, based on the incoming GLN code and last character of the Order Reference number.
The last character of the Order ref Num will have A,B or C.
Where, ' A' for R/3 152 Client
' B' for R/3 142 Client
'C' for R/3 132 Client.
1. PlantGLN_Routing lookup file :
DestinationSystem, Plant GLNCode, Partner Number,
A, 5000243000473, GDKDVRC152,
B, 5000243000473, GDKDVRC142,
C, 5000243000473, GDKDVRC132,
A 500034000487 GDKDVRC152,
B 500034000487 GDKDVRC142,
C 500034000487 GDKDVRC132,
By Using DestinationSystem and Plant GLN Code as lookup key --> I need to get the value of partner system.
2. IdocCtrlLookup
Purpose: To read the IdocCtrlLookup file to populate the Idoc control segment
Now based on the partner system from previous table --> I need to get the details of Sender Port , Sender Partner Type , Sender Partner Function , Sender Partner Number , Rx Port , Rx Partner Type , Rx Partner Function , Rx Partner Number.
Please help me how can acheive this scenario with the help of lookups.
Its very urgent.
Regards
Krupakar.HI,
Here you would have to use one mapping for dynamic routing , based on this create IM and use it in receiver determination.
the another mapping is general to file to idoc.
see the dynamic routing link here
Dynamic Configuration of Some Communication Channel Parameters using Message Mapping -
/people/william.li/blog/2006/04/18/dynamic-configuration-of-some-communication-channel-parameters-using-message-mapping
Also if you know the field name the context object can be defined for partner no that can be used in receiver determination in condition. to particular partner no in receiver determination.
Regards
Chilla -
Hi All,
I am doing File to IDoc scenario( Bypass) for Orders05.
File is picking succesfully and not posting the idoc in the SAP..
My source file(idoc-xml) consists of all the required data to post the idoc including the segment 'E1EDK01'.
but the error it is showing is <b>" Obligatory node 'E1EDK01' missing in the structure ORDERS05 "</b>
Please suggest me ASAP what is going wrong .
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Seema.The source File is not the idoc XML. It is invalid. You might need to ask the source to change the XML or use a Mapping to do this.
This is how it should look, ( check the parts in bold),
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ORDERS05>
<IDOC <b>BEGIN ="1"</b>>
<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="EDI_DC40">
<DOCNUM>1</DOCNUM>
<DIRECT>2</DIRECT>
<IDOCTYP>ORDERS05</IDOCTYP>
<CIMTYP></CIMTYP>
<MESTYP>ORDERS</MESTYP>
<SNDPOR>XXXXXXXXX</SNDPOR>
<SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT>
<SNDPFC></SNDPFC>
<SNDPRN>XXXXXXXX</SNDPRN>
<RCVPOR>XXXXXX</RCVPOR>
<RCVPRT>LS</RCVPRT>
<RCVPFC></RCVPFC>
<RCVPRN>XXXXXXXX</RCVPRN>
<CREDAT>20070511</CREDAT>
<CRETIM>152803</CRETIM>
</EDI_DC40>
<E1EDK01 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><BELNR>AAAAAAAAA123</BELNR>
</E1EDK01<b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>>
<E1EDKA1 ><PARVW>EK</PARVW> <ILNNR>231654845121</ILNNR>
</E1EDKA1>
<E1EDKA1 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><PARVW>LF</PARVW>
<NAME1>international</NAME1>
<NAME2>Delhi</NAME2>
<ILNNR>2121211545</ILNNR>
</E1EDKA1><E1EDK02 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><QUALF>001</QUALF>
<BELNR>AAAAAAAAA123</BELNR>
</E1EDK02><E1EDK02 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><QUALF>002</QUALF>
<BELNR>AAAAAAAAA123</BELNR>
</E1EDK02><E1EDP01><POSEX>45</POSEX>
<E1EDP19 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><QUALF>001</QUALF>
<IDTNR>00000000002150059</IDTNR>
<KTEXT>Reddy</KTEXT>
</E1EDP19><E1EDP19>
<QUALF>003</QUALF>
<IDTNR>5484218521214</IDTNR>
</E1EDP19></E1EDP01>
</IDOC></ORDERS05>
Regards
Bhavesh
PS : You need to add SEGMENT = "1" for every segment. Please do add it if I have missed in the XML above. -
IDocs not created in file to IDoc scenario
Hi all
I am trying this file to IDoc scenario.
File picked up successfully and sent to R/3 Backend But Idoc is not posted the status records
In /n we05 in R/3 Backend shows that EDI: Partner profile inbound not available
I created/tested all basics like RFC dest, port etc.
File service that I am using is a business service hence I am specifying a Logical system name in
<b>Adapter specific Identifiers</b> of the file service.
I disabled EDI_DC40 control tag record as IDoc adapter
takes care of it.
So at first I tried the configuration of IDoc comm. Channel by checking the Apply control record values from payload
But SXMB monitor gave an error regarding this control record tag I guess as we have disabled it so there wont be any values
for control record in payload (correct me if I am wrong).
So I unchecked the checkbox Apply control record values from payload and monitor showed up as successfully processed.
But in the backend I am getting this error regarding partner profile.
I also tried to use an existing profile (<b>LS</b> type) by modifying its inbound parameters to accept <b>CREMAS</b> Idoc.
But the error is as persistent as me
Pls help
SudhirHi
Sender --> LEGACY, maintained in SLD (Logical system).
Receiver--> ENI maintained in SLD with logical sys name M700.
Partner Profile LEGACY maintained in R3.
<b>Following is the IDocOutbound in SXMB monitor in XI</b>.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- <!-- Response
-->
- <SAP:IDocOutbound xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<SAP:TABNAM>EDI_DC40</SAP:TABNAM>
<SAP:MANDT>100</SAP:MANDT>
<SAP:DOCREL>640</SAP:DOCREL>
<SAP:DOCNUM>0000000000001013</SAP:DOCNUM>
<SAP:DIRECT>2</SAP:DIRECT>
<SAP:IDOCTYP>CREMAS03</SAP:IDOCTYP>
<SAP:CIMTYP />
<SAP:MESTYP>CREMAS</SAP:MESTYP>
<SAP:MESCOD />
<SAP:MESFCT />
<SAP:SNDPOR>SAPAXI</SAP:SNDPOR>
<SAP:SNDPRN>LEGACY</SAP:SNDPRN>
<SAP:SNDPRT>LS</SAP:SNDPRT>
<SAP:SNDPFC />
<SAP:RCVPOR>SAPENI</SAP:RCVPOR>
<SAP:RCVPRN>M700</SAP:RCVPRN>
<SAP:RCVPRT>LS</SAP:RCVPRT>
<SAP:RCVPFC />
<SAP:TEST />
<SAP:SERIAL />
<SAP:EXPRSS />
<SAP:STD />
<SAP:STDVRS />
<SAP:STATUS />
<SAP:OUTMOD />
<SAP:SNDSAD />
<SAP:SNDLAD />
<SAP:RCVSAD />
<SAP:RCVLAD />
<SAP:STDMES />
<SAP:REFINT />
<SAP:REFGRP />
<SAP:REFMES />
<SAP:CREDAT>0000-00-00</SAP:CREDAT>
<SAP:CRETIM>00:00:00</SAP:CRETIM>
<SAP:ARCKEY>DF57A2C0532811D9AD84000F206A031B</SAP:ARCKEY>
</SAP:IDocOutbound>
<b>Control record of IDoc in R3</b>
Tab: Typeinfo
Basic type-->CREMAS03
Message Type-->CREMAS
Tab: Partner
Recipient
Port -->SAPENI
Partner Number--> M700
Partner Type-->LS
Sender
Port -->SAPAXI
Partner Number--> LEGACY
Partner Type-->LS
Pls help
Regards
Sudhir -
File to idoc scenario in pi 7.1
Hi All,
I am testing file to Idoc scenario.
I have few queries. I am using PI 7.1
1) in Message mapping - I import the receiver idoc metadata. and doing mapping.
So there are couple of mandatory fields over there. Please let me know how to treat them. Do I need to diable them or put some value. for exp Direct, Segment. SNDPRN RECPRN all these madatory fields are there. Please advice.
2) When I am creating communication component for sender side(File system) then should I assign the logical port and if then what name it can be . Is there any other place we need to maintain this entry. I remember in PI 7.0 I dont need to assign the local name. But here i see I need to do. if I am not putting the name over there then it throw error message "Unable to convert the sender service <Business Compoenetname> to an ALE logical system.
Please advice how to overcome
3) now any how I am able to process the idoc from PI and its coming to ECC system. but it showing failed over there and giving me error message.
"EDI: Partner profile inbound not available"
I checked all the relevent partner prfile configuration is already there"
I have already used all the forums , I did these scenario in past in PI 7.0 and never faced much issue . but doing first in PI 7.1 after a long time, so I might be possible, I am missing some thing. Please advice and help. thank
RamHi Ram,
There is nothing new in PI7.1 which can cause these errors.. it is because the interface is configured wrongly
>>1) in Message mapping - I import the receiver idoc metadata. and doing mapping.So there are couple of mandatory fields over there. Please let me know how to treat them. Do I need to diable them or put some value. for exp Direct, Segment. SNDPRN RECPRN all these madatory fields are there. Please advice.
If you know the value the you can create the control record during mapping and the fields which you don;t required you can map it co constant. It is using this control record the partner profile entries are found and if there is a mismatch then the idoc will fail with the error which you mentioned in point 3
>>2) When I am creating communication component for sender side(File system) then should I assign the logical port and if then what name it can be . Is there any other place we need to maintain this entry. I remember in PI 7.0 I dont need to assign the local name. But here i see I need to do. if I am not putting the name over there then it throw error message "Unable to convert the sender service <Business Compoenetname> to an ALE logical system.
No in 7.1 also we dont have to do anything like that. There is a blog on this error from Michael, please go through it and understand why and how this error occurs. May be in PI7.0 you were lucky enough for not getting this error
>>3) now any how I am able to process the idoc from PI and its coming to ECC system. but it showing failed over there and giving me error message. "EDI: Partner profile inbound not available"I checked all the relevent partner prfile configuration is already there"
Check the control record of the generated idoc and see whether you have a partner profile entry for the parameters mentioned in it. If not then you need to correct them in PI
Regards
Suraj -
File to IDOC scenario : Error with mapping due to Context handling
Hi Experts.
I have a file to IDOC scenario which need your advice.
Source File structure as follows:
Control_Header <1:1>
Invoice_Header <1:unbounded)
Invoice_Line <1:unbounded)
Trailer <1:1>
Payload as follows capture from SXMB_MONI
- <Control_Header>
<Key>999</Key>
<TransactionID>RCTV</TransactionID>
</Control_Header>
- <Invoice_Header>
<Key>000</Key>
<BusinessUnit>HDB05</BusinessUnit>
<InvoiceNo>64471</InvoiceNo>
</Invoice_Header>
- <Invoice_Line>
<Key>001</Key>
<UnitPrice>7.00000</UnitPrice>
<Quantity>1.0000</Quantity>
<GSTAmount>0.49</GSTAmount>
<GSTRate>0.07</GSTRate>
</Invoice_Line>
- <Invoice_Line>
<Key>001</Key>
<UnitPrice>8.00000</UnitPrice>
<Quantity>1.0000</Quantity>
<GSTAmount>0.56</GSTAmount>
<GSTRate>0.07</GSTRate>
</Invoice_Line>
- <Invoice_Header>
<Key>000</Key>
<BusinessUnit>HDB21</BusinessUnit>
<InvoiceNo>6Y0575</InvoiceNo>
</Invoice_Header>
- <Invoice_Line>
<Key>001</Key>
<UnitPrice>49.50000</UnitPrice>
<Quantity>1.0000</Quantity>
<GSTAmount>3.47</GSTAmount>
<GSTRate>0.07</GSTRate>
</Invoice_Line>
- <Trailer>
<Key>TRL</Key>
<TransactionID>RCTV</TransactionID>
<TotalFeedLine>96</TotalFeedLine>
<HashTotalValue>212.00</HashTotalValue>
</Trailer>
</ns:MT_EINVOICE>
Mapping as follow:
IDOC
<Control_Header> -> <Control_Header>
<Invoice_Header> --> <Header_Invoice>
<Invoice_Line> ---> removeContext --> <Line_Invoice> this is the child node of <Header_Invoice>
<Trailer> -
> <Trailer>
The result of the using the above Payload get the following result which not wht I seek
<Control_Header>
<Header_Invoice>
<Line_Invoice>
<Line_Invoice>
<Line_Invoice> *** This belong to the Invoice_Line of the second <Header_Invoice> at the payload
<Header_Invoice>
<Line_Invoice> *** THis segment is empty
<Trailer>
I required the Line_Invoice to belong to the child of the second <Header_Invoice>, I have tried using
removecontext with splitVaue and collaspeContext but to no avail.
May I know what is my mistake on the mapping of the Invoice_Line to Line_Invoice>
Rgds
FNGHello,
There should be something that could correlate the Invoice_Header/Key and Invoice_Line/Key. In your example, both are the same for the first and data set. If the sample looks like the one below, it is possible to sort things by correlating the Invoice_Header key and Invoice_Line key
<Invoice_Header>
<Key>000<Key>
</Invoice_Header>
<Invoice_Line>
<Key>000<Key>
</Invoice_Line>
<Invoice_Line>
<Key>000<Key>
</Invoice_Line>
<Invoice_Header>
<Key>001<Key>
</Invoice_Header>
<Invoice_Line>
<Key>001<Key>
</Invoice_Line>
An example mapping could look like this
For Header
Invoice_Header --> Header_Invoice
For Line
/InvoiceLine/Key --> removeContext --> splitByValue:valueChanged --> Invoice_Line
The subfields of the invoice line would also follow a similar logic, you just need to use formatByExample --> splitByValue:eachValue so that the context levels are the same.
Hope this helps,
Mark -
PI7.1 File to Idoc scenario issue.
Hi,
We recently had an upgrade from PI7 to PI7.1.
When testing File to Idoc scenario ,we had an issue as below
Trace level="1" type="T">*** START APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Error during lookup - com.sap.aii.mapping.lookup.LookupException: Error when calling an adapter by using the communication channel GeneratedReceiverChannel_RFC (Party: , Service: ED2_200, Object ID: a8f14398a9993dccadbe983d401f693a) The channel with object ID a8f14398a9993dccadbe983d401f693a could not be found in the Integration Server Java Cache. Check if the channel exists in the Integration Builder Directory and execute a refresh of the Java Cache.</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Error when parsing RFC Response - null</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** END APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
This was working fine before upggrade.
Any changes required to be done in scenario?
Pls let me know.
Thanks,
Srinivasado a CPA cache refresh
http://hostname:port/CPACache/refresh?mode=full
also check if the object is visible in tcode SXI_CACHE..
also refresh the SXI_CACHE -
XI 3 File to IDoc scenario - Still referencing Old Logical system
Hi
Dont know if you can help. I have a file to idoc scenario using XI 3 to R/3 4.6c system.
I had the interface working from a third party system XMLHUB to SAP R/3. The Logical system name for the XMLHUB was XMLHUB01 in the SLD which I have set up as a partner profile in R/3. I have recently changed the logical system name to XMLHUBDEV01 in the SLD and created that logical system in R/3 and changed the partner profile to XMLHUBDEV01.
Unfortunately in the sender information of the IDoc the partner number is still XMLHUB01 and not XMLHUBDEV01. I don't understand where this partner is sent from to get into the control record of the IDoc.
I have cleared the SLD cache in both the Repository and the directory. Is there somewhere else I should be looking? Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
Danielhi daniel...
this thread wud answer ur query....
Re: IDOC Payload
regards..
vishal -
Message has error status at outbound side File To Idoc Scenario
hi ,
In my File to Idoc scenario , when i go to sxmb_moni , i found that its showing red flag at Outbound Status Tab and showing message "Message has error status at outbound side".
When i go to IDX5 and and select my idoc and click on Transaction Id it shows "Password logon no longer possible - too many faile" .
Please suggest what may be the problem ?
Regards,
Rohit1. First check the RFC destination name used in receiver Idoc adapter communication channel.
2. As i said earlier, in sm59 transaction in XI gui, u can check same rfc destination under type 3. There check the logon credentials and the username.
3. Now goto the R3 system GUI and check in su01 that same user is locked or not. If locked unlock it.
4. And if u change the password of that user, then do the similar change in XI -> sm59 -> rfc destination logon credential
Regards,
Prateek -
Error in File to IDOC Scenario
Hi,
I have File to IDOC scenario.
I am getting error in sender file channel.
"Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Mandatory parameter 'xml.keyfieldName': no value found "
Although I have used this parameter in content conversion 'xml.keyfieldName' (for each sub structure and defined a key field).
Despite of this error in sender channel I am receiving the message in XI.
But in XI also it throws error :
"Unable to convert the sender service PG_TOM_CEEMEA_RU_SFA to an ALE logical system"
Any help on this ?
Thanks,
VikasHello Vikas,
I am getting error in sender file channel.
"Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Mandatory parameter 'xml.keyfieldName': no value found "
Although I have used this parameter in content conversion 'xml.keyfieldName' (for each sub structure and defined a key field).
Check your flat file structure whether the key field you have chosen is appropriate and also recheck the FCC details whether you have assigned the value for the key field i.e. keyFieldValue.
"Unable to convert the sender service PG_TOM_CEEMEA_RU_SFA to an ALE logical system"
regarding the above error refer this
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/Unable%20to%20convert%20Sender%20system%20to%20ALE%20logical%20system
Regards,
Prasanna -
Error while doing a File to IDOC scenario
Hi Experts,
I have created a File to IDOC scenario where in i have sent a file which has to pass data to ABSEN1 IDOC.I could see the IDOC reaching R/3 ,but with the status 56: "EDI: Partner profile inbound not available"
I have checked with all the configurations and couldnt find where it went wrong.
Kindly help me in this regard.
Thanks.Hi
Check the inbound parameter and the process code.
To find Process code for IDoc use Tcode WE42.
ALE idoc trouble shooting use
Troubleshooting of ALE Process
look also this configuration
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6bd6f69a-0701-0010-a88b-adbb6ee89b34 -
How to handle the control records in case of file to idoc scenario.
Hi All,
can you please clarify me how to handle the control records in case of file to idoc scenario.Hi,
In File to Idoc scenario even though you selected apply control record values from payload and you are not getting those correct values which you have provided in the mapping.
Also check the checkboxes Take sender from payload and Take receiver from payload along with the Apply control record values from payload checkbox
Regards
Seshagiri -
Hi Experts,
i need some help for doing file to idoc scenario.
1. what are the configurations we must do while doing this scenario?
2. How to communicate with Legacy system to sap system?
3. How to create the business and logical systems for SAP systems in SLD?
4. How to define parameters in communcation in ID?
5. what work shold be done using SM59 and WE20? and specify the steps please?
6. finally if u having word file please send from the creation of logical system for sap system?
thanx.Go thru below mentioned links.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/73527b2c-0501-0010-5398-c4ac372c9692
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6bd6f69a-0701-0010-a88b-adbb6ee89b34
once you go thru them you will find answers for questions.
thanks,
Venkat -
File to IDOC scenario-no messages in SXMB_MONI
Hi all,
I know this is asked so many times ,I checked some links but couldn;t find out the gap where it happened.
I am doing a File to IDOC scenario through XI mapping.
I am not getting any messages in SXMB_MONI.
When I check Communication Channel monitering in Runtime Workbench, it shows processing successfully, then it should generate messages in SXMB_MONI and intimate whether the scenario created is correct or not right!
Please help.
My scenario goes like this:
Sender : Business service(Some file location)
Used File adapter for sender communication channnel.
Receiver : Business system(SAP R/3)
Used IDOC Adapter for receiver communication channel.
One more thing is,do I need to create logical system for Business service also?If so, where do I maintain it?(In SAP R/3 or in XI system?)
Till now,I maintained my XI system as logical system in WE20 and I didn't create any logical system for business service in any system.Does it create main problem?Hi , I am able to poll the files from file location now.and I am receiving IDOC into SAP R/3 with status 56.I already created partner for file path as a logical system and assigned inbound parameters with respective message type . Even the status shows :
An inbound partner profile could not be found with the following key:
/LSDEMO/LS//DEBMAS////
This involves the key fields of table EDP21:
-SNDPRN partner number of sender
-SNDPRT partner type of sender
-SNDPFC partner function of sender
-MESTYP logical message type
-MESCOD logical message code
-MESFCT logical message function
-TEST test flag
I already manitained following data and there is one record in EDP21.
SNDPRN = LSDEMO
SNDPRT = LS
SNDPFC = LS
MESTYP = DEBMAS
MESCOD = space
MESFCT = space
TEST = space
EVCODE = DEBM
SYNCHK = X
METHOD = space
USRTYP = space
USRLNG = space
INMOD = space
DCART = space
And please let me know whether I have to maintain outbound parameters also for my partner in XI system.I didn't see any difference even I maintained it.
And my IDOC takes another port rather than I mentioned in my SNDPRN(sender port) of my IDOC control record in message mapping.Let me know whether it's mandatory to maintain port name with SAP<XXX>convension,because IDOC in R/3 is picking the port with that naming convension.
Edited by: Jaya on Feb 26, 2010 10:17 AM
Edited by: Jaya on Feb 26, 2010 10:27 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hanns-g 19" doesn't work with macbook...
I have a Hanns 19" external monitor, which I have been using with my Aluminium PowerBookG4 laptop with no problems. I also have a Black MacBook, running 10.4.8. Yesterday I purchased the Apple Mini-DVI to DVI adaptor and plugged it in to the macbook
-
Exchange 2013 - Missing Emails sent internally
Can someone please help me diagnose what has happened with the following problem User1 sends an email at 23:18 from his works laptop at home which is connecting to exchange using Outlook Anywhere User1 sends an email to 4 users: "User2, User3, User4,
-
Oracle Access Manager, ADAM & UCM integration? Help please..
I`m currently investigating the potential of using Oracle Access Manager (OAM) as a tool that allows connections to multiple Active Directory(AD) or ADAM servers providing a single point to author and manage users with a good easy to use GUI. The UCM
-
Hi, i have a multiple images for a interactive map, this is ok on mi localhost all images is displaying correctly. But when i upload the swf to the server, only one image is not loaded. Any idea when pass this? The images is displayed when selected a
-
Masking One Students Identity in a Crowded Classroom Scene
Masking a Persons Identity in a Crowded Scene Hello, I have footage of high school classrooms that are part of a study by Harvard University and the University of Michigan. In most cases we have permission to show all of the faces, for a few videos