File transfer options

Getting ready to move data from my old Windows machine to a IMac G5. Should I use the firewire port on each machine or will the USB port work just as well.

Eugene, Welcome to the discussion area!
If Windows supports Firewire networking, use Firewire. Otherwise use Ethernet.

Similar Messages

  • File transfer option dissapears in Group Chat

    Hi All,
    When adding a 3rd person to a chat in J4W the file transfer option dissapears. 
    Is this by design?
    I have tested in 9.1.3 and 9.1.4.
    Thanks

    Hi Ben,
    File transfer in group chates is not currently supported in Jabber for Windows. It is a backlog item but has not been comitted to a specific release at this time.
    Thanks.
    Mark

  • Removing file transfer options from client GUI.

    How do you remove all of the file transfer options from the client GUI (the button, the right-click menu option, etc.)?

    You can add <argument>allow_attachments=false</argument> in /var/opt/SUNwbsvr7/https:<hostname>/webapps/<hostname>im/en/im.jnlp file
    to disable file transfer options from the Client GUI.
    Or else if your using AM with IM then you can disable by setting the proper policy for DefaultUser through amconsole.

  • Skype for web add file transfer option

    First of all, this web based skype is pretty good. There is only on thing i seen to be missing and that is an option for file transfer/sharing.  Keep up the good work on this guys and do not dare to dissapoint us again like when you removed the modern windows skype app

    Hi,
    Thanks for your feedback. We will continue to add more features during the regular updates through the beta phase. Stay tuned.

  • File Transfer Option Greyed Out with Google Talk users..

    I don't know if this is possible. Is it possible to get file transfer to work between Mac iChat 4.0 users and Google Talk Windows users? Or is this not possible.. if it is possible can someone point me in the direction of getting this enabled?
    Thank you,
    Kevin

    I think I've ran into a licensing issue; On Oracle Standard Edition, only ASM is allowed.
    Arjan

  • File transfer option not available for remote devices under MAX

    I am currently using LabVIEW 2012 and am using a application running on a Windows 7 PC to communicate (TCP/IP over Ethernet) with a RT PC.  I have built an installer that installs a LabVIEW application as well as MAX on the Windows 7 PC.  After installation i can open MAX and browse under Remote Systems to my RT device but am unable to ftp files to the the RT device as the File Transfer feature on the drop down menu is not shown. (This PC does not have the LabVIEW development environment installed.)  Does anyone know if there are Additional Installers that are required to be included that will activate this feature or any reason why this feature in not available?
    Regards,
    Rob  

    Did you include the MAX FTP Client from the RT module in your installer? See this knowledgebase to see what I mean:
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/571113c2ce05998e862574e8006005a2?OpenDocument
    Also, you can most likely just do ftp using windows explorer, if you prefer that method. Just open up windows explorer, and in the address bar type "ftp://x.x.x.x/" (where x.x.x.x is the IP address of the RT PC you are accessing.
    Also, are you using the LabVIEW real-time module on your RT PC?
    Colden

  • "Windows - No Disk" error message on file transfer

    Hello!
    I updated our ZDM7 server from plain old ZDM7 with no updates to ZDM7 SP1
    IR1. Now, when initiating File Transfer operation with any workstation, up
    comes this error message:
    "Windows - No Disk"
    "Exception Processing Message c0000013 Parameters 75b6bf9c 4 75b6bf9c 75b6bf9c"
    [Cancel] [Try Again] [Continue]
    If I click "Continue" 4 times, file transfer starts up successfully.
    Any ideas about how to get rid of this annoying message?
    Toomas Aas

    Toomas,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://support.novell.com/forums/

  • UCMA 4 and back to backing a file transfer request

    OK, I know that file transfer isn't technically supported on UCMA 4.0, but I wanted to take another look at it and see whether there was a way to b2b a file transfer request. After all, there's no reason that it shouldn't work if the messaging is correct,
    right? The scenario I have is A <-b2b-> app <-b2b->B.  I have an IM conversation going on between A and B, so now I'm trying to set it up so that A can send a file to B. 
    So far I've extended the platform to accept file transfer requests by creating my own call and factory classes, and then registering them using RegisterPlatformExtension.  This means that when A sends a file, the INVITE gets delivered to my application. 
    Now I'm taking that INVITE and creating a new b2b call.  A file transfer request looks something like this:
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [0]16A8.4B28::02/10/2015-19:53:05.007.001d492f (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::ProtocolRecord::Flush:ProtocolRecord.cpp(265))[3939761282] $$begin_record
    Trace-Correlation-Id: 3939761282
    Instance-Id: FDB3
    Direction: incoming
    Peer: 10.0.154.20:49282
    Message-Type: request
    Start-Line: INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
    From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=eafd3e699d;epid=ccd5657cac
    To: <sip:[email protected]>
    Call-ID: 0acf0330423241258576d7c5cc42aa01
    CSeq: 1 INVITE
    Contact: <sip:[email protected];opaque=user:epid:d2lIs-103l2YSpDwCSajtAAA;gruu>
    Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.0.154.20:49282
    Max-Forwards: 70
    Content-Length: 1920
    Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0"
    Message-Body:
    ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0
    Content-Type: application/sdp
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Content-ID: <[email protected]>
    Content-Dis; handling=optional; ms-proxy-2007fallback
    v=0
    o=- 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.200.71
    s=session
    c=IN IP4 192.168.200.71
    b=CT:99980
    t=0 0
    m=data 21300 TCP/RTP/SAVP 127
    a=ice-ufrag:lYAu
    a=ice-pwd:y0gkW4r9zGSW6E2VdtMprlEh
    a=candidate:1 1 TCP-PASS 2120613887 192.168.200.71 10856 typ host
    a=candidate:1 2 TCP-PASS 2120613374 192.168.200.71 10856 typ host
    a=candidate:2 1 TCP-ACT 2121006591 192.168.200.71 21300 typ host
    a=candidate:2 2 TCP-ACT 2121006078 192.168.200.71 21300 typ host
    a=candidate:3 1 TCP-PASS 2120612863 10.0.154.20 31624 typ host
    a=candidate:3 2 TCP-PASS 2120612350 10.0.154.20 31624 typ host
    a=candidate:4 1 TCP-ACT 2121005567 10.0.154.20 3921 typ host
    a=candidate:4 2 TCP-ACT 2121005054 10.0.154.20 3921 typ host
    a=cryptoscale:1 client AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:4CZbzYM/GYDbygj8JwMTodKo85C4Xx7TMzeMIuBU|2^31|1:1
    a=crypto:2 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:Ohlo65gDsUvxCF39A382Rl4vGL+SG9R/lUEYU/br|2^31|1:1
    a=crypto:3 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:EZ7Zm3K0H/WW5K49LAk9/C0T8x8nhkumJOycSek7|2^31
    a=setup:active
    a=connection:new
    a=rtcp:21300
    a=mid:1
    a=sendonly
    a=rtpmap:127 x-data/90000
    ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0
    Content-Type: application/ms-filetransfer+xml
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Content-ID: <[email protected]>
    Content-Dis; handling=optional
    <request xmlns=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/rtc/2009/05/filetransfer" =
    requestId=3D"13">
    <publishFile>
    <fileInfo embedded=3D"true">
    <id>{67190A30-C59F-480D-96DD-5F3941C39C49}</id>
    <name>dbchange.log</name>
    <size>3609</size>
    </fileInfo>
    </publishFile>
    </request>
    ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0--
    $$end_record
    I've got my b2bed invite looking almost identical to the original invite by creating a custom MIME type on the CallEstablishOptions for the back to back call using something like this:
    Regex r = new Regex(@"^((.|\n)*)(\<request)((.|\n)*)(request\>)((.|\n)*)$");
    Match m=r.Match(args.RequestData.GetMessageBodyString());
    content=string.Format("Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r\n{0}{1}{2}",m.Groups[3],m.Groups[4],m.Groups[6]);
    opt.CustomMimeParts.Add(new MimePartContentDescription(new ContentType("application/ms-filetransfer+xml"),System.Text.ASCIIEncoding.UTF8.GetBytes(content)));
    opt.CustomMimeParts[0].ContentDispositionHeader = new SignalingHeader("Content-Disposition", "render; handling=optional");
    So far the only differences I can see in my outbound message vs the original SDP are that the Content-Transfer-Encoding might not be seen as a header (since the SignalingHeaders property on the MimePartContentDescription is read only), and the Content-Transfer-Encoding
    on the first MIME part (created by the BackToBackCall) is missing (even though I specified it on the PassThroughHeaders).  Even with all of this though, I still get a 488 on client B when I attempt the transfer (even though the invite goes through). 
    What I'm wondering though, is whether there's any way at all to get this working the way I'd expect, where a file gets transferred directly between A and B, without my bot having to receive it first.  The other approach I've looked at is binding my
    own media provider class to customize the SDP, but if this MIME part approach isn't going to work, then I have a feeling the media provider won't work either. 
    Any suggestions on where to look next? 
    Thanks!
    Chris

    Chris,
    I am trying to do something similar to this and from what I have read and in talking to MS is that you need to extend the Call and Flow class which it looks like you have been able to do. Could I bother you to share what you have written? Maybe we can help
    each other out on this. I am basically trying to create an application that will be able to capture a file transfer and save it, then send the original request on to the intended recipient.
    Thanks in advance,
    Anthony

  • How to achieve the maximum file transfer rate from PXI to local host?

    I will have to copy a huge amount of data (as big as 50 GB) from a PXI-8106 unit on site to a laptop. Currently it would take several hours. It is critical to max out the data transfer rate.
    The standard method we've been using is just drag and drop using Windows Explorer via FTP. I tried to use FTP VIs with Filezilla Server as well but the transfer rate is only like 1.5 MB/s. Is this normal? Once I saw it was 3.0 MB/s but for some reason, that isn't happening now.
    For another option, I tried to transfer data to a USB flash drive but it's even slower. As far as I know, USB 2.0 transfer rate is supposed to be around 60 MB/s but why would it be slower than 1.5 MB/s? What could be the speed limiting factor in my file transfer setup?
    Any tips on improving file transfer rate would be appreciated!

    Sustained 40 MB/s? That is my dream speed! The maximum speed I've ever seen here was about 25 MB/s, which is still very good, and that happened only after copying back and forth, which I explained above. Let me go through what I did with screencaps first.
    These are the test tdms files to transfer in the PXI: an original file witten in the PXI and its copy file. I copied the original file from PXI to laptop and renamed it (added '_copy') and then copied it back to PXI.
    FTP module is transferring the original file to the Filezilla server on laptop. Note the low speed.
    FTP module is transferring the copy file to the Filezilla server on laptop. Note the higher speed.
    This is the FTP sub VI I'm using. It transfers files in sub-folders (one level lower), too. The data connection is set to 'passive' on the FTP Put Multiple Files VI but it doesn't seem to make any difference. I attach the sub VI.
    You tried the file transfer with a 500 MB text file. Would there be any difference if the file type was tdms? Would the RAM size matter? It is 2GB here.
    And the LED is orange, which means Gigabit.
    Another question: Is there any way to programmatically stop file transfer in progress? Currently, I just have to restart the PXI.
    Thank you!
    Attachments:
    FTP.vi ‏40 KB

  • Remote Execute and File Transfer Error

    Whenever we try to do a Remote Execute of File Transfer, we get an 1899
    error. Here's the strange thing, we can RE and FT to desktops that are
    still running the ZfD 4.x client. Seems to be only happening on the latest
    (ZfD 6.5sp2). Any ideas? Also, remote control and remote view still work
    w/o problem.

    Blewis,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
    - Check all of the other support tools and options available at
    http://support.novell.com.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://support.novell.com/forums/

  • Creative Zen USB and File transfer probl

    Am the unhappy owner of a brand new Creative Zen touch 20gb mp3 player which apparently works with usb 2.0. After installing the software which came on the cd (file transfer software and nomad explorer) the Zen appears to get recognised by the pc with no problems when i connect via the usb cable. The Zen also displays 'docked' which is all very well. However if i select say 0 tracks to download to the player the xp progress bar seems to halt at around 60-70% and eventually the program (nomad) complains that the operation cannot be completed. I noticed that the small hard dri've in the player feels as though it is 'spinning down' around a similar time to the message being displayed. If at this stage i refresh the players view in nomad explorer it can be found with no problem....its just i cant write to it until i unplug the usb from the zen and reconnect. I spoke to creative who told me that because my pc (in system devices) reports that my usb is an 'open host' adapter...this means it cannot supply adequate power to the player....but surely USB2.0 is USB2.0 and if something claims to be USB2.0 compliant that would be the end of the story? The usb card im using is a usb 2.0 pci card and is also pretty new. Any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated.
    I have tried various usb ports, usb and2 conections ( I have both), various cables and combinations and the same happens. I have also tried win xp and win98, and other disks I have with the same result. I have managed to transfer 20 os so mp3s (a small proportion of those I have been trying to transfer)after 3-4 hours hard labour but never the contents of a full folder. After a proportion of the files are transferred then Zen touch becomes 'busy' or 'not connected'. Obviously there is no way I can continue like this and it will have to go back.
    I have tried the slightly newer driver but this did not work at all and I had to roll back to the one that came on the CD. I feel that I have given it a fair shot trying all the workarounds.
    Is is a USB power problem? Should a powered usb hub cure it's If so why?
    But is this surely is Creative's problem. It is obviously a known issue but what are they doing about it's Putting out Zens which are prone to this problem is not good practice. Any solutions out there?

    Hey,
    If you tried it on a friend's computer and you're still having problems then it may be a problem with the Zen. Before you call or e-mail tech support, here is what they will tell you do to first before they really get in depth with helping you. Go into Rescue Mode (there is an explanation on how to do this at the top of the forum) and do a disk clean up. After that, try it. If that doesn't work then click the reload OS option which will take the firmware (like windows to your PC) off the Zen. Don't worry you can easily put it back on. Go to Support>Downloads>select Zen Touch, etc, etc. and download the latest firmware and run it. Hopefully that will fix it....
    I had some connection problems myself with my ZT as soon as I got it as well. and simply reflashing the firmware fixed and now I love my Zen. I hope everything works out for you.
    Wilco

  • When will file transfer be used to send a message?

    Hi,
    My understanding is that a message is only sent via file transfer if the size of the message is greater than 75% of the IPC queue capacity; file transfer will never be used in response to a blocking situation that arises due to the number of messages exhausting the queue capacity (this will result in an immediate failure if the TPNOBLOCK flag is used, or else a failure response when the timeout is reached).
    We have the following message in the ULOG:
    "TMQUEUE.4288.3081606848.0: LIBTUX_CAT:1285: WARN: tpreturn message send blocked, will try file transfer"
    Would I be correct in assuming this is because of the size of the message, or is this something specific to TMQUEUE operations? If my understanding of how transfer by disk can occur is wrong, please set me straight!
    Thanks,
    Malcolm.

    Malcolm,
    Tuxedo will use file transfer if
    a) The size of the message is greater than 75% of the total capacity of the queue.
    b) The original msgsnd() fails with EINVAL. (Some operating systems have a MSGMAX kernel configuration parameter limiting the size of an individual message which can be set to less than the total capacity of the queue. If an application attempts to send a message greater than this size it will fail with EINVAL.)
    c) The original non-blocking msgsnd() fails with EAGAIN and the message is being sent by tpreturn(). (This is the case where LIBTUX_CAT:1285 is logged.)
    d) The original non-blocking msgsnd() fails with EAGAIN, the TPNOBLOCK option is not set, the original message is over 500 bytes, the TMNOTHREADS environment variable is not set to Y, and the message is not being sent by certain system processes that are always single threaded.
    For domain gateways only, the file transfer in case (c) can be avoided if GW_FILETRANSFER=OFF is set.
    Regards,
    Ed

  • How to transfer files using Oracle Managed File Transfer from Oracle EBS 12.1.3

    Hello,
    I'm looking for ideas to securely transfer files bi-directional between Oracle EBS 12.1.3 to IIS using Oracle Managed File Transfer and SOA.  Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi Hussain,
    In the Note 466649.1
    Edited
    I have installed R12.1.1
    Datafiles on installed on local file system /u01/EBS_DATa/*dbf, *.ctl, *.log
    doing non RAC to RAC conversion with ASM option,
    I am using ASM with RAC and created ASM disks (DATA, FRA, CRS) on Shared SAN disks between node1 and node2 which are DATA for CRD (control, redo and Data) files, FRA for archive files, CRS for cluster files while doing RAC instalation,
    now how i move my CRD on local file system /u01/EBS_DATa/*dbf, *.ctl, *.log to shared ASM disk DATA ???????
    Please describe with step wise,
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Vara
    Edited by: user13409653 on Jan 3, 2012 12:25 AM
    Edited by: user13409653 on Jan 3, 2012 5:10 AM

  • Steps for File Transfer through FTPS...!!!

    Hi ,
    Can anyone please tell the steps for file transfer with FTPS.
    Does PI file adapter has bulilt in feauture to handle this? or
    Do we need to deploy anything to handle this?
    Do we need to install any certificates by requesting from partner or It will do the encryptions/authentications on its own?
    Any additional Steps we need to mention in File receiver adapter while we send the file through FTPS?
    File is going through port 1090(unsecure connection) but it is not going through port (990) which is a secure connection.
    Please suggest me.
    Thanks
    Krupakar

    Hi Shabarish,
    We got the certificate from the partner and loaded into the trusted CA's. I tried running by giving
    Connectivity Security as "FTPS for Control and Data Connection" and Command Order as "AUTH TLS,USER,PASS,PBSZ,PROT"
    Ip: XXX.YY.YY.ZZZ
    Port: 990
    User and pwd.
    and I am getting the same below error
    Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: iaik.security.ssl.SSLCertificateException: Peer certificate rejected by ChainVerifier
    I tried by selecting different options like
    1. Without selecting the X509 certificate for client authentication.
    2.  Keystore as TRUSTED\view\entry-cert
       X509 certificate and private key as TRUSTED\view\entry-cert
    3. Keystore as TRUSTED\view
      X509 certificate and private key as TRUSTED\entry-cert
    4.Keystore as "view"
      X509 certificate and private key as "entry-cert"
    Please help me in this.
    Thanks
    Krupakar

  • Stuck in file transfer mode?

    I recently bought a NOkia 5310 express music phone, and I'm trying to copy some songs onto it. Whenever I try to get it set up to copy the music it says that my phone is "in file transfer mode, and cannot be use with pc suite, quit file transfer mode from the phone if you want to use the phone with pc suite". I have no idea what file transfer mode is, or how to get out of it. anyone have any idea?

    Hi,
    First of all, it doesn't matter if you choose the option of "PC Suite" or "Media".  It works both way when all you want to do is to transfer music.  I personally wouldn't choose "Media".  Somehow for my N97, my Messenging will switch back from mass memory to phone memory and it is really annoying.  At times when I choose "Media", my computer says that the USB is connected in non-compatible mode etc.
    One thing I notice too is that my music player would be "hanged" if connected via USB.  Nothing we can do.  To listen to your music using your phone, I reckon you have to stop the USB connection.  So that is normal.
    Using menu setting to PC Suite saves you the trouble of having to select the mode EVERYTIME.  So, that too is a good choice.
    Let's forget about OVI Player for a moment.  After you plug in your phone, if you start the PC Suite, you should see that your phone is detected.  If not, try reconnect the cable, try using PC Suite to connect to the phone (there is a button to do that I remember if the phone is not detected).  If still cannot, like my friend, you will probably need to reinstall the latest firmware via Nokia Care Store.
    Let's say your PC Suite application can detect your phone, you may wish to see if you can transfer the music.  You may wanna do one testing here.  Open up the File Manager from your PC Suite.  Transfer the songs manually, then do a refresh at your Music Library of your phone.  You should see the tracks.  If yours is a Comes With Music like mine, you can get the licence over the air.  Once that is done, I suppose you should be able to transfer the music files via your OVI Player.  While, it is tedious, but that was how it works for me.
    I wish Nokia is easier on us, but it is not.  Sorry. 
    Visit http://www.WilfridWong.com - where all good things are meant to be shared!

Maybe you are looking for