Filr 1.1 Technical Preview // Bug // Mobile Client

Hello Team,
I am experiencing an issue with Netfolders over the mobile client.
I have noticed that contents of the netfolders is not showing when ntfs permissions are set via security groups.
When I add explicitly the user part of the security group to the ntfs permissions, then I run a sync , and I see the contents of the netfolder.
Issue is only present in the mobile app (tested with iOS7). Access via the Web Interface seems to be working without issues.
Can you let me know if this is a bug or my configuration is not optimized.

UPDATE: issue is present in the desktop app as well. If permissions are set via Security Groups I cannot navigate to the subfolders.
If everyone is set then I can see the contents. If username is explicitly specified in the NTFS Permissions, subfolders are listed as well.
Only web access seems to be working flawlessly at this point.

Similar Messages

Filr 1.1 Technical Preview // Bug // Netfolders disappear

Hi Team,
during the testing I found out a small bug. Not sure if others are experiencing the same behavior.
NetFolders are mapped and accessed from all interfaces (web, mobile, desktop app).
If I start from the Webinterface, then go to the list of netfolder, then I have a NetFolder XX. The next level opens many more subfolders. To some of them I have share permissions + ntfs access, to some I only have share permissions. So, when I try to open a subfolder without any ntfs access , the contents are empty.
At this point if I click on NetFolders at the top, there are no netfolders. Just the notification you get when absolutely no netfolders are configured on the server. At this point, accessing with the same user web/mobile/desktopp app does not show you any netfolders.
Tested with multiple users and multiple folders without ntfs access
Workaround 1: Restart Filr Appliance and / or 5-10 minute of user inactivity.
Workaround 2: The second time I hit Netfolders and the netfolders disappear, then I can go back in the browser, from the breadcrumbs I can select a upper level folder or the root netfolder, then everything is fine.
Can anyone confirm if this is a bug or if there is anything I can do to further investigate?

On 21/07/2014 12:26, vtodorovelatec wrote:
> Can anyone confirm if this is a bug or if there is anything I can do to
> further investigate?
If you have access to the Filr 1.1 Technical Preview then I believe you
should also have access to a Vibe-hosted forum for reporting issues. I
suggest that you therefore repost this (and the other issue you reported
here) to that forum.
HTH.
Simon
Novell Knowledge Partner
If you find this post helpful and are logged into the web interface,
please show your appreciation and click on the star below. Thanks.

Filr 1.1 Technical Preview now available!

The Filr 1.1 Technical Preview is now open. Simply navigate to this
site in order to register and gain access.
https://vibe.novell.com/vibe/filr-1-...w_registration
Your world is on the move. http://www.novell.com/mobility/
BrainShare 2014 is coming. http://www.novell.com/brainshare/

ashmoore wrote:
> Its teasing us - the files are listed but when you try to download you
> get this message....
>
> We're sorry, we are unable to complete the download at this time.
> You are not authorized to access this item.
I tried a little while ago and it worked for me. Can you try it again?
Your world is on the move. http://www.novell.com/mobility/
BrainShare 2014 is coming. http://www.novell.com/brainshare/

Windows 10 Technical Preview bug

On 8.1 just installed 10. On first start everything was ok... it was until restarted... . When tried to login again everything on laptop display was black... In the bottom right part was language bar, that contains only help button...
Best wishes,
Ivan Spahiyski

It is highly recommended when installing Windows 10 Technical Preview to ensure that all devices are fully up-to-date with the latest drivers from the system or device manufacturer. Please update the video driver to see if the issue appears with the latest
drivers installed.
Brandon
Windows Outreach Team- IT Pro
Windows for IT Pros on TechNet

Lumia 925 stuck on 10051 - 10.0.12534.59 - Windows 10 Phone Technical Preview - T-Mobile

I see many people have upgraded to at least 10052 and if I read correctly, windows phone 10 build 10061. My phone seems to be stuck on the current build, 10.0.12534.59, which is problematic as I've lost cellular data and have to rely exclusively on wifi.
Is there a manual process I can follow to re-kickstart the build downloads? I re-ran Windows Insider, again chose Insider Fast, and after that rebooted just in case that would make a difference. The Phone Update setting panel insists my phone is up-to-date,
last checked 8 minutes ago.
I wouldn't mind but w/o cellular data it's a bit of a pain. I've tried the two APNs for t-mobile I could find, fast.t-mobile.com and epc.tmobile.com, and when neither of those worked I deleted the SIM settings.

latest windows phone 10 build is 10052, you are already on the latest version. OS version 10.0.12534.59 is equivalent to windows phone 10 build is 10052.
there no windows phone 10 build 10061 being release to public.

Has anyone seen any issues with persistent Chat in the Skype for Business Technical Preview client? No Messages dispalyed.

Hi all,
We are testing out the new Skype for Business technical preview client
with Lync 2013 and although we're not really users of Persistent Chat, I wanted to install this feature too so I added a server pool just to check things out.
I can post and even search the history (which shows results), but apart from seeing my immediate post, when I close the room a re-enter I see nothing. I get a notifications that there are new posts, but clicking "Read" button also does nothing.
We're off for Easter and I wont have access to another Lync 2013 client until we return, so I'm not sure if there is just something odd with my installation.
I would be interesting to see if other are having this issue.
Cheers
Chris

<xmlns:texthelpns rwthpgen="1">I have asked Microsoft about this directly because it came up.</xmlns:texthelpns><xmlns:texthelpns rwthpgen="1"> It's a known issue that has been resolved, but the
version in which it's resolved won't be available until the general client release on April 14th.</xmlns:texthelpns>
<xmlns:texthelpns rwthpgen="1">Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".</xmlns:texthelpns>
SWC Unified Communications
<xmlns:texthelpns rwthpgen="1">This forum post is based upon my personal experience and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.</xmlns:texthelpns>
Thanks Anthony. I was about to dig into troubleshooting a bit more based on Holger's response.
(sorry about the XML tag additions, I have no idea why these are continuously added to my quoted or edited posts. I thought I had tried different browsers with the same result, but will try again).
Chris

Hyper-v Client in Win10 Enterprise Technical Preview does not boot to PXE via Leagacy Network Adapter after OS is installed using gen 1 BIOS

Using Hyper-v within Windows 10 Enterprise Technical Preview to boot a Win 7 Legacy BIOS (Generation 1) Operating system client does not boot to PXE legacy network adapter after operating system has been installed within the Virtual Client.
Hyper-v Client will boot to PXE Legacy Network Adapter only when no other boot device is available and no OS is installed.
Hyper-V settings seem to ignore BIOS - Startup order within Hyper-V Client Settings and will always boot to VHD before Legacy Network Adapter even if Legacy Network adapter is first in the startup list.
IF VHD is deleted and a new VHD added to the Client then will boot to PXE using Legacy Network Adapter. Again once OS is installed then will not boot to PXE Legacy Network Adapater.
Gen 2 BIOS/UEFI works as expected and boots to PXE network everytime.

Hi shaunmoncrieff,
Thank you for the information.
Currently I am not available to take a test using Windows 10 on physical machine.
You may try to submit this information through Windows Feedback Tool, once I have tested, I will update the results here.
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

About the error: "The account is not authorized to login from this station" when you access NAS devices from Windows 10 Technical Preview (build 9926)

Scenario:
With the release of Windows 10 Technical Preview (build 9926), some users may encounter an error message of “The account is not authorized to login from this station” when trying to access remote files saved in NAS storage. In
addition, the following error log may also be found via Event Viewer:
Rejected an insecure guest logon.
This event indicates that the server attempted to log the user on as an unauthenticated guest but was denied by the client. Guest logons do not support standard security features such as signing and encryption. As a result,
guest logons are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks that can expose sensitive data on the network. Windows disables insecure guest logons by default. Microsoft does not recommend enabling insecure guest logons.
Background:
The error message is due to a change we made in Windows 10 Technical Preview (build 9926) which is related to security and remote file access that may affect you.
Previously, remote file access includes a way of connecting to a file server without a username and password, which was termed as “guest access”.
With guest access authentication, the user does not need to send a user name or password.
The security change is intended to address a weakness when using guest access. While the server may be fine not distinguishing among clients for files (and, you can imagine in the home scenario that it doesn’t
matter to you which of your family members is looking at the shared folder of pictures from your last vacation), this can actually put you at risk elsewhere. Without an account and password, the client doesn’t end up with a secure connection to the server.
A malicious server can put itself in the middle (also known as the Man-In-The-Middle attack), and trick the client into sending files or accepting malicious data. This is not necessarily a big concern in your home, but can be an issue when you take your
laptop to your local coffee shop and someone there is lurking, ready to compromise your automatic connections to a server that you can’t verify. Or when your child goes back to the dorm at the university. The change we made removes the ability to connect
to NAS devices with guest access, but the error message which is shown in build 9926 does not clearly explain what happened. We are working on a better experience for the final product which will help people who are in this situation.
As a Windows Insider you’re seeing our work in progress; we’re sorry for any inconvenience it may have caused.
Suggestion:
You may see some workarounds (eg. making a registry change restores your ability to connect with guest access).
We do NOT recommend making that change as it leaves you vulnerable to the kinds of attacks this change was meant to protect you from.
The recommended solution is to add an explicit account and password on your NAS device, and use that for the connections. It is a one-time inconvenience,
but the long term benefits are worthwhile. If you are having trouble configuring your system, send us your feedback via the Feedback App and post your information here so we can document additional affected scenarios.
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Hi RPMM,
Homegroup works great in Windows 10 Technical Preview (9926 build), when I invited my Windows 10 Technical Preview (9926 build) joined in HomeGroup, I can access the shares smoothly:
My shares settings is like this:
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Locale Settings lost on mobile client 7.8.2.14 after creation of BIP report

Hi All,
we went live with BI Publisher reports (Siebel 7.8.2.14) at the beginning of June.
Now some of our users are having trouble with their mobile web client.
For example our colleagues in Poland have their Windows XP regional settings set to "Polish". It will make Siebel use date format for all date fields (e.g. activity start date) display as YYYY-MM-DD - this works just fine until user is creating a BIP report. After successfull report creation, all locale settings in the mobile client are lost. Instead of YYYY-MM-DD, the dates are displayed in DD.MM.YYYY and creation of new records produces and error. Also, currency and number formats are mixed up.
I assume it's a bug - anyone hit this before?
Edited by: Penky on Jun 17, 2011 11:38 AM

Yes, we finally decided to do so!
The main reason was that we had a lot of new report change requests and did not want to do the work twice (now in Actuate and then again in BIP). Also we plan our 8.x upgrade for second half of 2011 so this was already some kind of preparation, so we can completely focus on the upgrade afterwards and don't need to hassle around with the reports as well.
issues we're still facing include "user's are not able to run reports after they change their position" or "List reports can only be run for few records, otherwise the search spec hit's an IO field's length limitation" or "report popup can not be suppressed although there's no useful information in it" (not to forget the one described in this thread) and some others.
Well ... after 1 1/2 years since I downloaded the first integration QF the BIP journey still does not end - it's like it just started :)

AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client v3.1.04066 "The VPN client driver encountered an error"

Hello, I am a software engineer and have been trying to connect to my client's VPN using the AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client (version 3.1.04066) and keep receiving the error "The VPN client driver encountered an error. Please try again or restart your system."
I am on a Windows 7 system with an intel i7-2670QM cpu. My computer model is an HP Pavilion dv7.
I have tried uninstalling the software, re-installing it. I've tried restarting my system multiple times through the process. I've checked the registry and made sure the name was setup correctly. I have checked and made sure that the correct services are not enabled. I have also tried what was suggested on the support page and checked the integrity of catroot2 as well as renaming it and regenerating the folder. None of these have been able to fix my problem.
For information, this is the message history when I try to connect:
[12/8/2014 8:55:49 AM] Ready to connect.
[12/8/2014 9:27:19 AM] Contacting vpn.[hostaddressremoved].com.
[12/8/2014 9:27:22 AM] Please enter your username and password.
[12/8/2014 9:27:29 AM] User credentials entered.
[12/8/2014 9:27:30 AM] Please respond to banner.
[12/8/2014 9:27:31 AM] User accepted banner.
[12/8/2014 9:27:31 AM] Establishing VPN session...
[12/8/2014 9:27:32 AM] Checking for profile updates...
[12/8/2014 9:27:32 AM] Checking for product updates...
[12/8/2014 9:27:32 AM] Checking for customization updates...
[12/8/2014 9:27:32 AM] Performing any required updates...
[12/8/2014 9:27:32 AM] Establishing VPN session...
[12/8/2014 9:27:32 AM] Establishing VPN - Initiating connection...
[12/8/2014 9:27:33 AM] Establishing VPN - Examining system...
[12/8/2014 9:27:33 AM] Establishing VPN - Activating VPN adapter...
[12/8/2014 9:27:33 AM] Establishing VPN - Attempting to repair VPN adapter...
[12/8/2014 9:27:33 AM] Disconnect in progress, please wait...
[12/8/2014 9:28:22 AM] Connection attempt has failed.
[12/8/2014 9:28:24 AM] Ready to connect.
I have tried every kind of search I can think of to find any other solutions to try, and I cannot find anything else. Does anyone have any other recommendations of what to try in order to be able to connect to my client?
-TheJayDude

Yes, I am sorry to say that several people have seen the same issue. It seems like the issue is specific to Yosemite and Anyconnect. My very technical staff and I have tried many things. The default route is missing and the file /var/run/resolv.conf is also missing which means that both the route and DNS server are messed up. We re-added the default route manually which allows us to ping the servers and even access them via the IP address
Run the command below before starting the VPN to get the default route
netstat -nr | grep default
Then run the following to re-add the default route.
route add default xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
BUT there is no way that I can find to fix the DNS entry.
We tried re-adding the DNS entries in the /var/run/resolv.conf and then restarting the DNS service
$ sudo launchctl unload -w /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.discoveryd.plist
Password:
$ sudo launchctl load -w /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.discoveryd.plist
BUT THIS DOES NOT WORK!
If anyone can help us solve the DNS issue, at least we have a work-around for our technical people until Cisco and/or Apple can resolve it.
Here is a link to the same issue at Cisco.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12334071/cisco-anyconnect-secure-mobi lity-client-os-x-yosemite-vpn-not-working-if-mac

How to install Windows Virtual PC in Technical Preview

Can I install Windows Virtual PC in Technical Preview?
I keep getting an error message Ox80096002 The certificate for the signer of the message is invalid or not found.
Should I carry on trying, or can't it be done?

Hi Salvador Freemanson,
Windows Virtual PC is not available in Windows 8 or later, for virtualization technology, it is replaced by Client Hyper-v.
Alex Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client on UC540

Hi everybody,
does anyone know if it´s possible to establish a connection with a
Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client directly to an UC 540?
I tried using a normal Cisco VPN Client from a Windows Desktop which works fine.
Now I´m trying to connect a Cius and a Samsung Smartphone with ASMC but this doesn´t work right now.
Is there another client available instead of ASMC?
Thanks in advance.
Stefan

Yes, I am sorry to say that several people have seen the same issue. It seems like the issue is specific to Yosemite and Anyconnect. My very technical staff and I have tried many things. The default route is missing and the file /var/run/resolv.conf is also missing which means that both the route and DNS server are messed up. We re-added the default route manually which allows us to ping the servers and even access them via the IP address
Run the command below before starting the VPN to get the default route
netstat -nr | grep default
Then run the following to re-add the default route.
route add default xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
BUT there is no way that I can find to fix the DNS entry.
We tried re-adding the DNS entries in the /var/run/resolv.conf and then restarting the DNS service
$ sudo launchctl unload -w /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.discoveryd.plist
Password:
$ sudo launchctl load -w /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.discoveryd.plist
BUT THIS DOES NOT WORK!
If anyone can help us solve the DNS issue, at least we have a work-around for our technical people until Cisco and/or Apple can resolve it.
Here is a link to the same issue at Cisco.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12334071/cisco-anyconnect-secure-mobi lity-client-os-x-yosemite-vpn-not-working-if-mac

Network becomes limited or unavailable as soon as i connect to cisco anyconnect secure mobility client, version - 3.1.05170

Hiee,
I am using cisco anyconnect secure mobility client, version - 3.1.05170 , in my windows 8.1 PC to access vpn to my office desktop. But as soon as i connect cisco anyconnect client, my wifi networks becomes limited or unavailable. Thus, i am not able to get remote access to my office desktop. And not even able to access any other websites also. But as soon as i disconnect from the cisco anyconnect vpn client, every thing becomes normal, and the exclamation mark from the network icon also disappears.
kindly help me in this regard.
Thanks and regards
Neeraj

There are a few things to consider here:
- The IPSec VPN client is EoL, so even if we consider this as a bug, it wouldn't be fixed
- fixing the file server access would break the DHCP renew which means there is no completely clean way to fix this, at least not at the IP level since the client can't route to the same destination using 2 different paths.
Is there any chance we could do a static policy NAT for the DHCP traffic so it appears to come from another IP? It's twisted and it may not work (the client might use the DHCP server IP embedded inside the payload and not the source IP) but if it does, then we'd fix the overlap.
Could the server use another IP address for the DHCP service (much like using a loopback for a certain service on a router?)
A third solution would be to NAT the destination server IP on the ASA for traffic from the IP pool going to the server. We'd need DNS doctoring as well to resolve the server's name to the NATted IP. This way the server would appear from the VPN client as being at a different IP, thereby fixing the overlap.
All these potential solutions are quite involved... you may be better off wityh a simpler design: splitting of your server into 2 or using something else to do DHCP for the VPN clients.

Windows 10 Technical Preview 10041, Firefox Nightly x64 most current, can launch, can't access settings, cannot place cursor in URL box

Have Windows 10 Technical Preview build 10041, Firefox Nightly x64 39.0a1 most current. Firefox will launch, but when browser appears no input to screen possible. Can't access settings, can't place cursor in URL box. Tried compatibility modes with no success. I may not have used this browser on Thursday, March 26, but it was working without issue on Wednesday, March 25. My speculation would be that one of the last two nightly updates broke this. This question posted from Chrome as Firefox not operating.

hello, that appears to be a known bug that's being worked on ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1147953 bug #1147953]).
please also note that as long as windows 10 is in it's pre-release preview state and there are still changes to the core platform, it will not be fully supported by firefox and things are bound to go wrong on occasion.

Phone Update not working in windows phone 10 technical preview

I recently upgraded my lumia 920 from windows 8.1 to windows 10. Now whenever I hit 'check for updates', it indefinitely stays there as if it's checking but it doesn't. I'm kinda worried that if any new windows 10 updates come, will I ever be able to update.
Is there a way to fix this issue without rolling back to windows 8.1?

I've got to bump up this issue. After several builds and all the updates, issue remains, and HP is silent on the forum as always. I've also posted another feedback post via Windows Feedback tool, and have posted new reply to the old post in the Windows Forum ( http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_tp-hardware/hp-hs2340-hspa-mobile-broadband-module-not-working/afd40168-bca2-4a72-a54f-8d70e15a71f5 ) Again, if there are any other users experiencing this issue with hs2340 and Windows 10 Technical Preview, please post both here and to the thread linked above (answers.microsoft.com website). If anyone had resolved it or found a newer driver than v.7.2.8.1 (for any Windows version) please post a link and/or workaround. Thank you in advance!Luka

Filr 1.1 Technical Preview // Bug // Mobile Client

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for