Filter backend contracts in SOS

Hi Experts,
We are on a 5.0 implementation, classic scenario.
When coming from the punch out catalog we want to filter using our own criteria for the Source of Supply.
We are using contracts in R/3 and it seems we cannot use the BBP_SOS_BADI because of that. Is there another way of filtering backend contracts in SOS.
Regards,
Tom

Hi Anand
Note 1024423 - Source of supply not found for service items in shopping car - but it is applicable for only srm 550 . check with SAP.
PERFORM sos_backend_call_meta
TABLES
lt_search_criteria
delete this line et_con_list
insert this line lt_con_list
this piece of small code makes big difference lt_con_list and et_con_list
Can any one tell what is the difference between lt_con_list and et_con_list parameters ?
This is issue was already raised here by Narendra Patil .
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/profile.jspa?userID=4184844
These notes are may not applicable for you . it depicts that there are some issues in the earlier verion on service source of supply.
Note 1287828 - Price not transferred from Contract for service item in SC
Note 1237029 - No contract information after assigning source of supply
Note 1246335 - No contract information after assigning source of supply
Note 1064139 - BBPSC: Service with Source-of-Supply and Contract
Note 1226132 - SE518 Error message from back-end system for service item
as per your expectation , you must see the source of supply .
Please create an OSS message under SRM-EBP-SHP with all screens ..
you will get some correct note to show the contract in the SRM . please update the sap note here too.
i dont have the system now to test your scenario.

Similar Messages

Backend contract as source of supply

Hi
We are using SRM 7 and classic scenario.
I have created a contract in ECC with account assignment K and with a free-text. I would like to use that one as source of supply. Do I have to put that in a source list in SRM or can SRM use the contract in ECC automatically?
What settings do I need to use?
Sincerely
Anders

Hi Anders,
It is standard that in the Classic scenario the backend contracts will
display as a relevent source of supply. But in Extended Classic the
system will search for local sources of supply and not backend ones.
-> Also please review and implement the following note:
1013440 RFC enabled function module to read R/3 Contracts
I'm not sure which on the FM's are called to read the backend SOS
META_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS
B46B_SOURCEDETER_GETSOS_MULTI
You could try using the BAPI, I have some example data which I found, you could use it to your wishes.
Call BAPI for source of supply determination
     CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SOURCEDETERMIN_GETSOS'
ls_search_criteria-material
ls_search_criteria-mat_grp     G02H01
ls_search_criteria-plant       9972
ls_search_criteria-deliv_date 20090824
ls_search_criteria-quantity             0.000
ls_search_criteria-unit
ls_search_criteria-item_cat
ls_search_criteria-acctasscat K
ls_search_criteria-purch_org   PBNF
ls_search_criteria-fixed_vend
ls_search_criteria-pckg_no     0000000000
ls_search_criteria-unit_iso
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

Creation of backend contract from SRM system?

Dear Experts,
I am bit confused with the scenario of creation of backend contract from SAP SRM system? It says in few cases, based on the BAdi 'BBP_DETERMINE_Logsys', the system creates a backned contract directly in a backend ERP system. Why do we need when we have central contract?
We can meet the same requirement through central contract where we will authorize only purchasing organizations of a backend system and block the contract for local sourcing in SRM?
Secondly, How to find a contract / scheduling agreement created in a backend system when a central contract is distributed to the backend system?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Hello Ranjan
question on contracts?
Note 1476307 - Importing parameter not filled in BADI BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
in classic scenario , The Business wanted to create a contract from cockpit or via BID
this BADI helps
Symptom
You have implemented BAdi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS to control the system in which contract is created in following scenarios:
1. Creation of contract from an accepted quote / bid.
2. Creation of contract from a requisition in SOCO.
In the method IF_EX_BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS~CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE of the BAdi implementation, importing parameter IT_ORG doesnot have any values.
Other terms
Backend contract
Reason and Prerequisites
some business wants to create a backend contract from SRM . see some Dinesh Powale / Claude threads for more understanding.
Muthu

Shopping Cart creation with reference to Backend Contract

Dear Experts,
We are working in SRM 7.0 Classic Scenario.
We have Backend Contract with document type PCTR which is available as Source of Suppliy when creating Shopping cart.
I can use this contracts as source of supply but the issue is when the Shopping cart total quantity crosses the target value of the Contract quantity there was no error message as the quantity has exceeded the target quantity.
The system is allowing me to create the Shopping cart but after approval the Shopping cart is showing the status as Approved and not creating PO or PR.
Is there any configuration available to get the update if the quantity in SC crosses the Target quantity of the backend contract.
It is also OK if the SC goes to Purchasers work list if the target quantity is crossed.
Kindly reply to this thread immedeately.
Regards,
B.N.Karthikeyan.

Hi
target quantity or Target value ?
what about your Contract value contract - target value or target quantity
i aware value contract is throwing message if the sc exceeds the contract value.
share your contract details.
is it created in ECC or CCTR or GCTR . target quantity for materials or taget value for that material
br
Muthu

SRM 7.01 Backend Contracts creation with XI/PI ESOA Service

Hello, we are implementing SRM 7.01 PPS with Extended Classic Scenario. We need to create contracts backend contracts ( ECC) from RFX RESPONSE at SRM. As we have ECC 6.0 EHP 5 we have to use Esoa services. The problem is that we have set up PI but no contract is created at ECC ( not even in SRM) when we pressed button " create contracts" from rfx response even thought the message at SRM is " contracts XXXXXX created" I think we are missing some customizing in ECC.
We have already implemented badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
I read note 1268821 who explains that we have to activate business function LOG_MM_P2PSE_1 in ECC but I think this only apply for "CENTRAL CONTRACTS" and we dont want to use central contracts. We just want to creates contracts at ECC from rfx response in SRM. I couldn´t find any documentation about this, just for Central Contracts or backend contracts creation (through idocs) . Any idea?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best Regards
Liam

The first interface that try to get out from SRM was " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1", thus based on this interface we made the configuration on PI. So, after pressing button " create contract" on srm if we execute tx SXI_MONITOR in SRM we found the interface " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1" and in the backend system ( ECC) at tv SXI_MONITOR we found interface PurchasingContractERPRequest_In_V1 for this contract with black and white flag ( processed successfully) but no contract created in ECC not even SRM.
Anyway we have checked that inbound proxy is executed but we dont see any contract created
Is this the right Interface? We are missing something?
Best regads and thanks again for your help!

Condition types in SRM for mapping purposes with backend contracts

Hello,
We need to map condition types for the creation of a Backend contract on the basis of a accepted bid.
We use SRM 5.0 but our products do not have prices in their product master!
We use the catalog funcion to indicate the prices of the materials. for service-items we manually add the prices in the Shopping cart.
How can I find out what conditions types we use in these circumstances in SRM 5.0?
What condition type are we using in the case of materials?
What condition type are we using in the case of service-items?
Thanks for any reply.
Aart

Hi
You can map the condition type 01CT (gross price) in SRM with PB00 for Gross Price in contracts. Standard SRM generally work with simple pricing with gross price condition types and do not have complex conditions unless you customize it. For material or services, it should matter from condition perspective unless you have done some specific customization.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Backend Contract in Vendor List

Hi All,
I have created a quantity contract in my R/3 backend which has the price specified, the contract is against a material group and no material code is specified.
I have assigned the contract number and item number along with the backend system reference to the vendor line in the vendor list for the same product category as specified in the contract.
When I create a "describe requirement" shopping cart for the product category and go to the Source of Supply tab I can see the contract reference for the vendor. However after assigning the vendor I get information message
"The price from the contract/info record is determined on ordering "
and have the following information on the source of supply tab
Vendor                   - Vendor name correctly specified
Contract / Item        - Contract nuumber and item number correctly specified
Purchasing Info Rec - Blank which is correct
Price                      - 0.00 GBP the price specified in the contract item is 525 GBP
Per                        - 1 Each which is correct
Is it possible for the price in the shopping cart to be updated based on the backend contract price as standard?
Cheers
Chris

Hi
I undersatnd that you have mentioned your backend contract in vendor list and it picks contarc but not a price. Please try contract without assigning to the vendor list .
As per general SRM
Automatic Price Determination in Shopping Cart
Priorities
Contract -Highiest priority
Catalog
Vendor Price
Product Price - Lowest priority
Existing Vendor Lists should be considered as well !
Are you getting source of supply like contract /info record entry hope that there no gray. i never tried this..but it is good try..
Source of Supply
cross check vendor list was activated..
regards
Muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Sep 8, 2008 1:16 PM
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Sep 8, 2008 1:35 PM
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Sep 8, 2008 1:48 PM

Idoc settings for Backend Contract creation in SRM 5.0

Hello,
Im working on SRM 5.0 (HP 11) and want to create a Backend contract in R/3 (46C) directly.
I do not need Local Contracts or GOAs en SRM!
As I interprete the config guide for Sourcing (page 59 and 70-75, the scenario I need uses the BADIs:
BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS (determining Back End System)
BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE (for Mapping SRM settings with R/3)
I also understand that the Idoc configuration only needs to be done in the backend!!? (page 73 / 74)
Trx: WE42 and WE20.
Is this correct? Or do I have to maintain also the the IDOCs config in the SRM system?
Thanks for any clue.
Aart

Hi,
Pls refer the foll thread for all settings:
Follow-on contract from Bid Invitation
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers.

What is the diff bet XI and Business connector, backend contracts & Goa?

hi friends
what is the diff bet XI and Business connector ,diff bet backend contracts and goa
i know that XI(for new customers) and business connector for existing customers
do u think xi and Business Connector perform the same task
Regards
Vinny

Hi Vinny,
As Khan told, business connector is old technolgy and it has almost same functionlities like in XI.
both are mainly used for converts idoc's into xml format....
GOA: Global outline agreemnts mainly used when srm is having multiple backend systems. with reference to GOA , we can create local contracts in backend systems ...
Thanks
Ravi

Contract price is zero in the shopping cart for backend contract

Hi
Our environment
SRM5.5 SP07
Classic scenario
Backend ECC 5.0
Business process
Created a Contract in ECC5.0 for services and Materials (Goods) separately.
While crating the shopping cart for services or Goods, contract is picked and showed up in the Source of supply section of the shopping cart.
But Contract price shows "0". Where as in backend a price is maintained in the contract for the services/Goods.
Before orderin the shopping cart, the Business users want to see the contract price in the shopping cart when a contract is assigned.
Question
How to show up the backend contract price in the shopping cart when a backend contract is picked up in the Source of supply section.
Is it standard? If so, any SAP notes are to be applied?
Did any one come accross this scenario. Please throw some light on the above issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Jagadish

Ruben
Thanks for your response.
I already looked at this option. This will not work for my business case.
The BADI can only change the data in the backgroung when a SC is saved and the user will not be able to view the backend Contract price before ordering the Shopping cart.
The users want to see the contract price when a backend Contract is assigned in the Source of Supply section before ordering the Shopping cart.
Regards
Jagadish

BADI for backend contract

Hi
We are in SRM 4.0 classic scenario with ECC 5 as backend.
I was activating the BADI BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE for creation of backend contracts. But not able to enter value trans type PCTR in parameter EV_PROCESS_TYPE.
"Default value" field is non editable. This parameter is showing "Exporting" type.
"Associated type" field is showing value CRMT_PROCESS_TYPE_DB.
If I change the parameter type to "Importing" default value field becomes editable.
Please suggest what should be done to enter the parameter value.
Thanks
Jagdish

Hi Vadim
Here is the ABAP code for the BADI.
method IF_EX_BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS~CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE .
CLASS CL_EXIT_MASTER DEFINITION LOAD.
DATA: EXIT_OBJ_TAB TYPE SXRT_EXIT_TAB,
 old_imp_class type seoclsname.
DATA: exitintf TYPE REF TO IF_EX_BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS,
 wa_flt_cache TYPE sxrt_flt_cache_struct,
 flt_name TYPE FILTNAME.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
 <exit_obj> TYPE SXRT_EXIT_TAB_STRUCT,
 <flt_cache_line> TYPE sxrt_flt_cache_struct.
READ TABLE INSTANCE_FLT_CACHE
 WITH KEY flt_name = flt_name
 method_name = 'CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE'
 TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
 LOOP AT INSTANCE_BADI_TABLE ASSIGNING <exit_obj>
 WHERE INTER_NAME = 'IF_EX_BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'
 AND METHOD_NAME = 'CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE'.
 APPEND <exit_obj> TO EXIT_OBJ_TAB.
 ENDLOOP.
 IF sy-subrc = 4.
 CALL METHOD CL_EXIT_MASTER=>CREATE_OBJ_BY_INTERFACE_FILTER
 EXPORTING
 CALLER = me
 INTER_NAME = 'IF_EX_BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'
 METHOD_NAME = 'CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE'
 IMPORTING
 exit_obj_tab = exit_obj_tab.
 APPEND LINES OF exit_obj_tab TO INSTANCE_BADI_TABLE.
 ENDIF.
 wa_flt_cache-flt_name = flt_name.
 wa_flt_cache-valid = sxrt_false.
 wa_flt_cache-method_name = 'CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE'.
 LOOP at exit_obj_tab ASSIGNING <exit_obj>
 WHERE ACTIVE = SXRT_TRUE
 AND RELEASED = SXRT_TRUE
 AND NOT obj IS INITIAL.
 CHECK <exit_obj>-imp_class NE old_imp_class.
 MOVE-CORRESPONDING <exit_obj> TO wa_flt_cache.
 wa_flt_cache-valid = sxrt_true.
 INSERT wa_flt_cache INTO TABLE INSTANCE_FLT_CACHE.
 old_imp_class = <exit_obj>-imp_class.
 ENDLOOP.
 IF wa_flt_cache-valid = sxrt_false.
 INSERT wa_flt_cache INTO TABLE INSTANCE_FLT_CACHE.
 ENDIF.
ENDIF.
LOOP AT INSTANCE_FLT_CACHE ASSIGNING <flt_cache_line>
 WHERE flt_name = flt_name
 AND valid = sxrt_true
 AND method_name = 'CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE'.
 CALL FUNCTION 'PF_ASTAT_OPEN'
 EXPORTING
 OPENKEY = 'fYruqT96i4cy5c8OmPkYZG'
 TYP = 'UE'.
 CASE <flt_cache_line>-imp_switch.
 WHEN 'VSR'.
 DATA: exc TYPE sfbm_xcptn, "#EC NEEDED
 data_ref TYPE REF TO DATA.
 IF <flt_cache_line>-eo_object is initial.
 CALL METHOD ('CL_FOBU_METHOD_EVALUATION')=>load
 EXPORTING
 im_class_name = <flt_cache_line>-imp_class
 im_interface_name = 'IF_EX_BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'
 im_method_name = 'CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE'
 RECEIVING
 re_fobu_method = <flt_cache_line>-eo_object
 EXCEPTIONS
 not_found = 1
 OTHERS = 2.
 IF sy-subrc = 2.
 MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
 WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
 ENDIF.
 CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
 ENDIF.
 CLEAR data_ref.
 GET REFERENCE OF IT_HEADER INTO data_ref.
 CALL METHOD <flt_cache_line>-eo_object->set_parameter(
 im_parmname = 'IT_HEADER'
 im_value = data_ref ).
 CLEAR data_ref.
 GET REFERENCE OF IT_ITEMS INTO data_ref.
 CALL METHOD <flt_cache_line>-eo_object->set_parameter(
 im_parmname = 'IT_ITEMS'
 im_value = data_ref ).
 CLEAR data_ref.
 GET REFERENCE OF IT_PARTNER INTO data_ref.
 CALL METHOD <flt_cache_line>-eo_object->set_parameter(
 im_parmname = 'IT_PARTNER'
 im_value = data_ref ).
 CLEAR data_ref.
 GET REFERENCE OF IT_ORG INTO data_ref.
 CALL METHOD <flt_cache_line>-eo_object->set_parameter(
 im_parmname = 'IT_ORG'
 im_value = data_ref ).
 CLEAR data_ref.
 GET REFERENCE OF CV_LOGSYS INTO data_ref.
 CALL METHOD <flt_cache_line>-eo_object->set_parameter(
 im_parmname = 'CV_LOGSYS'
 im_value = data_ref ).
 CALL METHOD <flt_cache_line>-eo_object->evaluate
 IMPORTING
 ex_exception = exc
 EXCEPTIONS
 raise_exception = 1
 OTHERS = 2.
 IF sy-subrc = 2.
 MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
 WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
 ENDIF.
 WHEN OTHERS.
 EXITINTF ?= <flt_cache_line>-OBJ.
 CALL METHOD EXITINTF->CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE
 EXPORTING
 IT_HEADER = IT_HEADER
 IT_ITEMS = IT_ITEMS
 IT_PARTNER = IT_PARTNER
 IT_ORG = IT_ORG
 CHANGING
 CV_LOGSYS = CV_LOGSYS.
 ENDCASE.
 CALL FUNCTION 'PF_ASTAT_CLOSE'
 EXPORTING
 OPENKEY = 'fYruqT96i4cy5c8OmPkYZG'
 TYP = 'UE'.
ENDLOOP.
endmethod.
Thanks
Jagdish

Product categories Central contracts as SOS in SC

Hello,
We are implementing SRM 7 Level 9 with extended classic scenario.
We have created central contracts with items with Products categories only.
Those central contracts do not appear when the requester has selected the same product category in the shopping cart item.
We see no IMG activities for this. What can we do?
Thanks in advance.

Hi
I have set up several central contracts, each time with one contract item with one product category. It means we have only ONE criteria.
Contracts never appear in SC SOS tab.
It works well with classic scenario (I can grab all contracts I have in ECC against the product category).
Does ECS require more than one criteria to automatically assign the contract to SC item? Because we want to run ECS here.

Creating backend contract

Hi all,
I'm using SRM 4.0 with R/3 backend 4.7. To create the follow-on documents i've activated Extended Classic Scenario (SRM Server - Cross-Application Basic Settings - Activate Extended Classic Scenario). In Org. plan in the tab Function for the pur. organization and pur. group I checked the corresponding indicators but left the Backend Purchasing Group and Purchasing Organization empty. This was done because if I fill the backend pur. group and pur. organization I can't create shopping cart.
After creating the shopping cart I'm creating the Purchase Contract and trying to transfer it to backend. In backend in transaction BD87 there is the following error: Enter PurOrg. Does anybody know what's the problem?
Best regards,
Vlad

Hi Vlad
Keep the current P.org & P.grp in PPOMA_BBP as they are.
In PPOMA_BBP, you can create an additional node for backend P.org (in function assign to backend P.org) and then create backend P.grp under this node.
Would suggest you to use backend p.org and P.grp in contract.
Best regards
Ramki

Backend contract without Mat no. unable to create Follow on doc in frm SRM

Hi SRM gurus,
We are in SRM 5.0 release using classic scenario. We have created contract in backend SAP but does not contain a material number (MATNR), only short text/description (TXZ01
). This contract is uploaded to CCM successfully and SRM requestors are able to shop the item via catalog ID. However, upon SRM approval of the shopping cart, the status is "approved" but no Follow on document is created in backend. During test, we have activated the tracing BAPI_PO_CREATE1 but it seems that workitem does not go through the FM.
We have also noticed that in COMMPR01, since no MATNR exist from backend, the short text does not replicated.
Can you pls advise how can we create a Follow on document if shopping cart has been raised from a Catalog but only containing short text description. PRODUCT ID does not available.
Thanks,
Madelyn

Hi Madelyn,
Its difficult to tell the exact reason why the shopping cart has not created any follow on document in the back end.
Please look at the following for resolving this issue :
1. In SPRO > IMG > SRM > SRM Server > Cross Application basic settings > Define objects in the backend system
Check whether this setting is properly defined or not.
2. Check in SLG1 & RZ20 (Application monitor) for any errors to get a clear picture.
3. Try to create a SC w/o referringa contract and check whether it creates any follow on document in the back end or not.
Also try creating a SC by referring the same contract but not through CCM.
Since there is no material obviously you don't find anything in COMMPR01. Check in COMM_HIERARCHY whether the product category for which the contract was created is shown under the R3MATCLASS (Material Groups)
Hope this will make you more clear and helps in resolving the issue.
Award points for helpful answers.
Rgds,
Teja

Backend contract

Hi all,
We created Purchase Requisition in Backend. Then in Enterprise Buyer we
proceeded with Bid Invitation and created the backend Purchase
Contract. But it created without reference to Purchase Requisition. (Item 00010 does not contain a purchase requisition). Is this situation correct? If not please help to solve the problem.
We are using SRM 4.0 in Extended classic scenario.
Regards,
Vlad

Hi,
See if the foll notes are helpful:
Note 1047512 - Contracts: Duplicate Messages
Note 817949 - No warning message at completion of contract
Note 1036725 - Contract Management: message BBP_CTR 079
Note 643551 - Contract: customizable messages
Note 920114 - Disable 'DELETE' while creating a new Contract
Note 902043 - Contract item created with line 0
Also see this related thread:
Contract not transfered to backend system
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Filter backend contracts in SOS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for