Filter for exposure compensation

When bracketing exposures, as is often done for landscape work HDR, etc), you typically end up with a large number if variants. It would be very helpful to be able to identify all images with a given exposure bias (typically zero). You could then quickly cull the discard images without having to brows through all the variants. I now do this by hand, color code the zero bias images, filter by the color and then x-flag the discards. I then view all, x-flag the matching variants and delete.

Hi
In COOIS > In the initial screen select Documented Goods movement in the list Field along with and other selection criteria and run the Report
In the list of orders > Expand corresponding order to view Documented goods movements list with the components with and w/o batch numbers
Regards
Brahmaji

Similar Messages

ND Filter vs EV Compensation

Question 1:
I’m acquiring a Neutral Density filter for my Nikon D90. It will reduce the light input by three stops.
Assume I am shooting in aperture mode.
What if, instead of using the ND filter, I simply lowered the EV (exposure compensation) to intentionally underexpose by 3 stops. Would the effect be the same?
I tend to think not, because the TTL metering, in the presence of the ND filter, would adjust in such a way as to not underexpose (it would simply lengthen the exposure time).
Since I don't have the filter yet I can't do a comparison, but is my thinking correct?
Question 2:
I’m using CS4. Which method (ND filter vs lowered EV) would give me the most control in CS4 Adobe Raw Converter (ARC)?
Thanks.

ricardo11111 wrote:
What if, instead of using the ND filter, I simply lowered the EV (exposure compensation) to intentionally underexpose by 3 stops. Would the effect be the same?
No...
Underexposing gives you an underexposed image. Using an ND filter gives you a correctly exposed image. You use an ND filter to reduce the ambient light (or whatever your light) is too strong and is falling outside the range of the exposure controls, for whatever reason.
For example...
You want to shoot a moving subject in bright daylight. The effect you want is a shallow depth of filed and a movement blurred background. Right? So you'd pan the camera with the subject. And you'd get a blurred background... right? Wrong... Because of the intensity of light, your shutter speed is high and your aperture is too small. Result? Sharp background, frozen action, not the feel you want. An ND filter would reduce the light passing through the camera's lens and so enable you to use a wider aperture and a slower shutter speed. Result... the effect you want.
Underexposing the same situation, apart from an underexposed image, would have the opposite effect. You'd be stopping down the lens even more and getting even greater depth of field and / or getting a faster shutter speed for even less blur...
Hope that explains the situation...

N8 camera exposure compensation

N8 exposure compensation is not working.
setting exposure to +2 and after taking the photo there is no difference...
anyone has the same issue?

No, mine's working fine so there's something wrong with yours, have you installed the Anna Camera Update from Beta Labs?
If so try Restore Camera Settings option in Settings.
Next option, Battery Out reset (switch off then hold power button down for about 8 seconds until out vibrates).
Next option, try the Restore Factory Settings for the whole phone under phone management in Settings.
Last option, reinstall the Firmware using Nokia Suite or NSU then reinstall the Anna Camera Update.
If ail above fails take it to Nokia Care as if that's not working who knows what else is wrong.
Good luck because it really is a great Camera.
N95 (RM159) V31.0.017, N8 (RM596) Belle 111.040.1511

Adjusting Exposure Compensation Settings Of 808 To...

Apart from the inaccurate white balance of the Pureview 808 in low light which appears to be a permanent feature of the phone(still waiting for confirmation from Nokia whether there will be a software update to correct this), it seems that the exposure of the Pureview 808 can be manipulated or adjusted in Creative mode with the "Exposure Compensation" feature found on the left side of the screen. Since the image of the 808 is always over-exposed in low light, I guess this feature may come in handy. Has anybody used this "Exposure Compensation" feature when taking pictures in low light? Are there any guidelines on the usage of this feature? I have fiddled around with the settlings yesterday and found that in very low light situations where a brightly lit object is in a completely dark background, the Exposure Compensation needs to be at -0.7 or -1.0 for a satisfactory image to appear. At 0 or -0.3, the image will become too bright and blurry. The ISO plays a part as well in these low light conditions as a minimum ISO400 is required for these low light shots.
I would appreciate some information or guidelines on the usage of the "Exposure Compensation" settings of the Pureview 808 in low light. At least the exposure can still be adjusted manually for a more usable image, unlike the white balance issue which seems to be a fixed or inherent thing in the 808(hopefully not perenially).
Thanks.

Try checking this and see if this helps you in any way: Nokia 808 PureView Tips, Tricks and Photography.
Another thing, one of our friends here posted a thread that there's a new update available for the said device so you may also want to check if the update is already available for your precious one. See here. Please take note though that update availability depends on the existing firmware version, operator and variant.
Checking Discussions Guidelines once in a while will not hurt.
Thanks for the information. Much appreciated. The latest update that I have on my 808 is software version 113.010.1507. The latest update (113.010.1508) is still not available yet at where I live.
THanks for the link on the Pureview tips and tricks. Will check on it in a while.
Cheers.

Flash Exposure Compensation Metadata

Please allow Bridge to read and state the degree of Flash Exposure Compensation that a photo uses in its metadata. Currently, Bridge does not read this info for Canon photos but the info is in the picture.

Yes, yes and yes. Its a good thing I kept Breezebrowser

Flash Exposure Compensation Value Not Displaying in EXIF Info

When adjusting Flash Exposure Compensation on Nikon D4 camera (not on the Speedlight) the set value is not showing in EXIF Field in Aperture 3.4.1. It always shows as a 0 value regardless of camera setting. When I open the .nef in Nikon View NX (v2.2.4) the set value for Flash Exposure Compensation is accurately shown in the EXIF info. Have tried editing the Aperture EXIF fields (removing Flash Exp Comp and re-entering it) but, to no avail. Has anyone seen this, or know of a solution? Are any D800 users seeing the same thing?
Thanks!

Greg,
All the references to the element "rdf:value" in the XMP Specification
Part 1 appear in discussions about the implementation of XMP Qualifiers.
Page 21,
The presence of property qualifiers is indicated by a special use of
the rdf:Description element. Each rdf:li array item in the example
contains an rdf:Description element, which itself contains the
following:
-- a special element called rdf:value that represents the value of
the property
-- zero or more other elements that represent qualifiers of the value.
In this case, there is one property qualifier called ns:role.
Page 26
Other qualifiers cause the RDF for the qualified property to look like
a struct with a special rdf:value field. The presence of rdf:value is
what denotes this as a qualified property.
Page 28
For qualifiers other than xml:lang, RDF forces the qualified property
to look like a struct with a special rdf:value field that contains the
actual value from the XMP Data Model. The other fields of the fake
struct are the qualifiers. The presence of rdf:value is what
distinguishes a real struct from a qualified property.
I assume that you are not trying to implement XMP qualifiers. Perhaps
you should use vra:value instead?
Carl Rambert, Pound Hill Software

600EX Flash - 5D III. Flash exposure compensation.

How can I set the FLASH exposure compensation from the CAMERA. It appears that I have to set the exposure compensation on the back of the flash unit. I would like be able to change the FLASH EC settings from the camera, not the flash unit.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Ok, I have my 5D III out with my 600EX-RT mounted.
Let's make sure you don't have terminology confused.
There are two different compensations... there's "explosure compensation" and "flash exposure compensation".
If you meter exposure with the camera and then use the rear dial (assuming you did not disable it) after waking up the metering system then the rear dial will change the "exposure" compensation (this changes the metering for the AMBIENT light reading that the camera reads -- ignoring the flash). So changing "exposure compensation" will not change the flash even if the flash is powered on and connected. It would only change the camera.
On the top of the camera, just in front of the top LCD screen, there are four buttons. One has a dimple on it. That button is the ISO & "flash exposure compensation" button. If you press that button, then the rear LCD screen should show you that the rear dial will control "Flash exposure comp." Turning the rear dial at that point will make the adjustment show initially ONLY on the camera LCD screen... UNTIL you press the 'Set' button in the middle of the dial. Once you do that, the rear LCD screen on the flash will show that you have the flash exposure compensation enabled (it will ONLY show this when you wake up the metering system... if the metering system is allowed to go inactive the flash will only display the netural compensation... but as soon as you re-activate metering it will display your exposure compenation as set on the camera.
Also... on the rear LCD screen there's a box just below the ISO setting that shows if you have flash exposure compensation set and the amount.
This is all being controlled only by the camera -- I'm not using the menu buttons on the flash itself.
IF I DO use the buttons on the flash to set flash exposure compensation then the camera is locked out. It will report what compensation has been set on the flash, but will not let me change it until I use the buttons on the flash to return it to 0.
Does that help and are you able to do this with your flash?
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

Where is the exposure compensation detail

I am looking for the exposure compensation detail in Lightroom 4.4 but cannot find it.

Maddieraz2 wrote:
Thanks Rob
You bet .
Maddieraz2 wrote:
Do I just download the plugin
Well, you have to install it too ('Add' using Plugin Manager).
Maddieraz2 wrote:
is it straightforward?
It takes some getting used to, but with practice, it is a very useful plugin indeed.
Worth noting: the plugin doesn't do anything you couldn't do yourself manually by editing .lrtemplate lua files (stored in 'Metadata Field Lists' folder in with Lightroom Presets) with a text editor - the plugin just makes it accessible to all users who can weild a mouse.
To be clear: you don't need a custom preset to see exposure bias, for example you can just select the built-in preset "EXIF". (exposure bias was omitted from the default preset for some reason).
Cheers,
Rob

Suggestion: Exposure Compensation

Suggestion for software update: Exposure compensation via the volume up/down button. The pics I take are amazingly good for such small lens and compact device, but the ability to compensate for those backlit situations would be excellent. How hard could it be?

Probably wouldn't be hard. The chips probably already have the feature. But it would destroy the utter simplicity. When I shoot people, I move or move them so they're not backlit. Backlit subjects tend to look noisy and in unkind light when you increase the exposure.
Kevin

Why is exposure compensation limited to +-4EV

I ran a quick test to determine whether exposure compensation worked better in the D7000 or in Lightroom. I started by taking one picture at ISO 1600 correctly exposed. I then reduced the ISO by half for the next 4 pictures ending with 100. I then loaded the pictures into LR 3.3 and adjusted the exposures of the pictures by 1, 2, 3 and 4 EV so they all ended up the same. If Lightroom was more efficient at exposure compensation the ISO 100 picture should be best. If the in-camera compensation is best the ISO 1600 should be best.
The first surprise was that the LR exposure compensation is limited to +-4EV.
The other surprise was that the ISO 100, 200, 400 and 800 pictures were indistiguishable. The ISO 1600 picture was the only one that looked different with both exposure and color being slightly off.
My tentative conclusion is that between ISO 100 and 800 LR and the in-camera are pretty much identical. At ISO 1600 (+4EV) LR is better, but that's a terribly narrow margin. You need 1-2 EV headroom to make adjustments.
I had hoped LR would have given mt a wider margin and, as it appears it would, superior compensation to the one implemented in the camera.
Yes, Yes, Yes, I know that it's probaably ACR doing it, but still!
Anker

When shooting in Camera RAW format you are retaining the full Analog to Digital (A/D) resolution, which today is 14 bits, or even 16 bits color depth (48 bits). When shooting JPEG the camera file output is limited to 8 bit color depth (24 bits). So even for 14 bit camera A/D converters we have:
This is not correct. jpeg files are gamma corrected while raw is a linear capture. Theoretically, a 8-bit jpeg in sRGB space can contain as much dynamic range as a raw file of any bit depth because of the tone curve. It breaks up quicker when you edit jpegs because you will start seeing posterization earlier because of the lower bit precision but the dynamic range is there to start with.
Jao xDL I appreciate the additional information and links you have provided, but it is probably more information (and some misinformation) than most of us can digest in one reading. Yes sRGB tone curve helps to "compress" a wider dynamic range" signal into the 24 bit JPEG space, but it still only contains 24 bits of information! My point is that when opening a Camera RAW file in LR we can use the camera's full A/D dynamic range for recovery of signal "beyond 24 bit JPEG." Today that is typically 14 bits or even 16 bits per color (42-48 bits), with even the cheapest cameras using 12 bit A/D. If JPEG has the same ability, then why are we capturing and using "larger" RAW files?
You also say:
At a fixed exposure, you actually will want to raise the ISO as far as you can to make sure you don't posterize shadow detail in the very deep shadows because of limited bit precision left over and to minimize the read noise contribution.
People use their expensive (and inexpensive) camera gear to shoot pictures, NOT run laboratory experiments! I don't want to change my ISO setting to get the best shadow details or use Auto ISO, except for very specific shooting situations. You are parsing technical semantics, gone way beyond the original question, and are now incorrectly restating what I already said:
The bottom line is that “best practice” is to expose for the maximum highlight value, even clipping highlights when you want to retain maximum noise-free shadow detail.
This is best left to use of 'Exposure Compensation' or 'Manual Exposure' settings, and review of image histogram on your camera. Just be aware that most camera histograms are a processed 24-bit sRGB JPEG representation. Your RAW file output will actually have significantly more "highlight" range than indicated! Do a Google search on ‘Rawnalyze.’ The author has sadly passed on, but you may be able to find a posted copy of the program.
The poster asked, "Why is LR Exposure limited to only ±4 EV." You can use the Tone Curve to increase the range as suggested by Lee Jay, but then you lose the other features it provides. In light of all the technical information everyone has presented, raising the Exposure range would be very useful.

Interactive report filter for date not working correctly

Hi,
I am having an interactive report. I tried to give a filter for a column(created_on) as created on>29-oct-2009 17:17
but i am getting the row containing created on as *29-oct-2009 17:17* in the report result. How can i correct this
problem
Thanks,
TJ

Hi,
I think it is because seconds.
So it is 29-oct-2009 17:17:00 and your record is e.g. 29-oct-2009 17:17:02
br, Jari
Edit
You can use trunc function in your select so that it round date to minutes
TRUNC(created_on,'MI') AS created_onBr, Jari
Edited by: jarola on Nov 5, 2009 3:02 PM

How to create one filter for N views in the same report

Hello everybody,
I need to have the same filter for diferent views that I have in the same report. Anyone knows how to do it?
Thanks in advance
Mario Mesquita

Hi,
In India site, you can create a SMTP connector which point to the local ISP.
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Set filter for only one column in tableview

Hi
i am using in MVC a htmlb:tableview with filter in only one column of 8.
This is all working fine, except that the user can enter a searchsting in the filterfield for all columns, but in handle_event (of the controller) ; i only react to a text in the filterfield of column 4 and ignore all other filtertext , which were maybe entered in the other columns.
My question:
how can i enter the filter only for one column, in a way that the user cannot enter any text in the filterfield of the other columns, only in column 4 ?
my view:
<htmlb:tableView id             = "requirements"
                 table          = "//model/pdst_reqs"
                 filter         = "APPLICATION"
                 keyColumn       = "EXTID"
                 iterator        = "<%=model%>"
                 footerVisible   = "FALSE"
                 encode          = "TRUE"
                 visibleRowCount = "<%=model->rowcount%>"
                 width           = "100%"/>
Best Regards
Britta

You can disbale the Filter for the particular column by setting the DISABLE_FILTER in the Iterator method IF_HTMLB_TABLEVIEW_ITERATOR~GET_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS. Here is the sample code
method IF_HTMLB_TABLEVIEW_ITERATOR~GET_COLUMN_DEFINITIONS .
CLEAR p_column_definitions.
CLEAR p_overwrites.
data tv_column TYPE TABLEVIEWCONTROL.
tv_column-COLUMNNAME          = 'FLDATE'.
tv_column-SORT                = 'X'.
tv_column-EDIT                = 'X'.
tv_column-ONCELLCLICK         = 'MyCellClick1'.
tv_column-title               = 'Date '.
APPEND tv_column TO p_column_definitions.
CLEAR tv_column.
tv_column-COLUMNNAME          = 'PRICE'.
tv_column-horizontalAlignment = 'right'.
tv_column-verticalAlignment   = 'middle'.
tv_column-ONCELLCLICK         = 'MyCellClick2'.
tv_column-title               = 'Currency'.
tv_column-EDIT                = 'X'.
tv_column-DISABLE_FILTER      = 'X'.    " <-------Like this
APPEND tv_column TO p_column_definitions.
endmethod.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Raja

Looking for a 58mm protective or UV filter for a Canon Macro using a Cannon MR-14EX Macro Ring Lite.

Looking for a 58mm protective or UV filter for a Canon Macro Lens EF using a Cannon MR-14EX Macro Ring Lite flash unit.
The lens has an external groove for the ring flash pawls, but filters I've found do not. The external diameter of the filters does not allow the ring flash pawls to reach the lens groove. I either need a filter with an external groove or one with no part larger diameter than the threads. Any ideas? Thanks, Tom

Which lens are you using? This adapter will work, so long as the front element doesn't rotate.
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Macrolite-Adapter-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00006HRMH

Error while creating function filter for SAP R3 destination

Hi All,
I am using SAP Portal Add-in 1.0 Patch 3 for Visual Studio 2003 with SAP Portal Runtime 1.0 Patch 3 for Microsoft .NET and SAPDotNetConnector2.0.
Portal server is successfully added to my server explorer.SAP R3 system destination is also added succesfully ,but when i create a function filter
for my destination function to add my RFC enabled function module it gives me an error message "Missing R3NAME=... or ASHOST=... in connect_param in RfcOpenEx",but when i log into the R3 system from portal system ,I am able to log successfully.
please see the attached jpg file for your reference.
what should I do,plz help me.

3 things:
1. When you say "but when i log into the R3 system from portal system ,I am able to log successfully"... what do you mean exactly? Do you mean you tried to do a "test connection"?
2. Make sure the portal user mapping is set to "user & password" and not SSO. In order to work with the destination in design time you need to have it set to User and Password. Later, for run-time connection you can change it to SSO.
3. If number 2 failed, can you please click on the destination in the server explorer and look at the property grid for the connection string property? make sure it's correct (you can post it here if you don't know).
Regards,
Ofer

Filter for exposure compensation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for