Filter on "Photo has Develop adjustments" flag?

Is there any way to filter on the "Photo has Develop adjustments" flag? I can't find it, but the filtering capability seems a bit opaque to me so maybe I'm just missing it.

Mike, once you're in the smart collection, you can then filter further by using the filter bar in grid view (if it's missing, hit the '\' key). You can type the directory name in the text filter. If you have directories with similar names, I saw a post from Dirk Jan de Ridder that shows how to search for exact words:
Try
+Fall+ (finds all photos containing the exact word 'fall')
+Fall (all photos starting with 'fall')
Fall+ (all photos ending with 'fall')

Similar Messages

  • How do you filter for photos with develop adjustments?

    I wanted to put this information out there, because it was difficult for me to find an answer to the question of "how do you quickly filter for photos that have develop adjustments?"
    Some earlier posts in this forum observe that a smart collection has the ability to filter files wherein "has adjustments" is "true." Yes, it can do that. And it can also add in a "date" parameter for more specific targeting. But it cannot simply say, "in the current folder," or "in the selected folder." And frankly, that's the exact situation when I need to filter down to the files I want: I'm in a folder—typically the current folder that I've just imported—and I've done a smattering of develop adjustments. Now, I want to quickly select just those images for export. Can't be done, not with a Smart Collection, anyway.
    But Lightroom is nothing if not deep, and if you approach the problem from a filtering standpoint, it will eventually get you there—but the solution is very non-obvious. Expose the filter bar, with your favorite preset: camera info, default columns... it doesn't really matter. Hover over the header bar and to the far right will become visible the "add column" widget. Add a column. From the pop-up menu on the name will come a long list of options, the second-to-last of which is "develop preset." Once that's in place, click on "custom." Save your current settings as a new preset and give it a descriptive name like "adjusted images."
    Now, when you're in your current—or any—folder, just click on "metadata" in the filter bar, and your custom preset will be in effect: any images that you've worked on will be selected. It's a fast, one-click selection.
    If there's another way of doing this (keep in mind it's for the selected or current folder only), let me know. It's such a seemingly desirable action that I'm kind of astounded there's no built-in or easy or obvious way to do it... or that no photographer has requested it.

    I am honored to have a response from Rikk "MVP" Flohr, and I do readily agree that your approach is one way to approach the issue. It puts the relevant images in a discrete area that is easy to access. However (this is where I look a gift horse in the mouth) I find "sorts" a bit underwhelming in comparison to "filtering." Two problems: first, the sort still does not 'clear your deck' of unwanted images. You still have to squint at the badges and carefully select the range at the top (or bottom). Mistakes can be made (and I would be the first to make them). Second, the sort command is "sticky," meaning that folder will always have that sort unless you undo it. In general, I think most photographers want to see a folder's images sorted by capture time, so they can easily glance to the beginning, middle, and end of the shoot. With my method, once you click out of the folder, the filter is taken away and you're back to normal.
    I do understand that Lightroom wants me to flag my images with rankings or stars or colors or dancing beavers or what-have-you. But in this particular situation, that's an extra step. If I've applied development adjustments, it's already done. Why shouldn't I be able to choose "Select Developed Photos" from the Edit menu, right under "Select Flagged Photos"?

  • "Photo has Develop adjustments" when none made

    Hello,
    I am importing a JPG photo into Lightroom 5.4.
    In the Import screen, in the "Apply During Import" section, both the "Develop Settings" and the "Metadata" fields are set to "None".
    Yet, as the import process progresses, I see the correct thumbnail being changed as develop adjustments take place automatically (cropping and turning the colour image into black and white, at least that's all I notice). Why does this happen and how can I prevent it from happening?
    I assume the instructions are embedded in the JPG file, which I created in Photoshop (and saved as both PSD and JPG), since it happens in two Lightroom installations, one on the Mac and one on Windows 7 (brand new installation). When I switch to the Develop module, the only step in history is the import.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!!
    Thanks,
    Gabor

    Yet, as the import process progresses, I see the correct thumbnail being changed as develop adjustments take place automatically (cropping and turning the colour image into black and white, at least that's all I notice). Why does this happen and how can I prevent it from happening?
    Initially, Lightroom is showing you the RAW file's embedded JPG preview, which has all in-camera adjustments applied.
    When it changes, you get a completely unadjusted RAW photo, none of the in-camera adjustments are applied. It is then up to you to edit the photo to make it look the way you want.
    There is no way to prevent this from happening in Lightroom.
    If you really like the initial view, then you might want to shoot JPG instead of RAW; or alternatively learn to use Lightroom to produce photos that might have superior image quality to the JPG. You can, if you want, develop your own Lightroom presets that can be applied either globally or individually to enhance your photos.
    I disagree that the initial view you see is "correct" (your word) as there are an infinite number of renderings of this image, it is not reasonable to say that one is "correct"; the JPG view is still edited in various ways by the in-camera algorithm, there is nothing sacred or correct about the in-camera algorithm.

  • Find Photos with Development Adjustments

    Let's say I have 100 photos in my folder/collection/whatever.
    But only 2 have any Development Adjustments applied - the other 98 are untouched.
    Is there any way in Lightroom to perform a Find / Filter / something so that only the 2 modified photos are shown?

    The reason I ask is that I'm importing JPGs. They, of course, end up in separate folders. Most of them are fine, but a few need tweaking.
    This might happen over the course of a month.
    So at the end of the month, I might have 15 directories - mostly original JPGs but a few edited.
    In order to upload my pics to Snapfish, I have to "export" the modified JPGs to a new JPG, but only *copy* the unmodified.
    If I forget to export the modified JPGs, when I upload I'll be copying the original JPG sans LR edits, hence my need for a quick and foolproof way of finding altered JPGs.

  • When developing an image from a smart collection "has no adjustments" it gets immediately deselected

    I am wondering if this could really be the intended LR behaviour?
    I start from a smart collection, one of the criteria is "has no adjustments".
    Ok, as soon as I move the first slider in develop module, it no longer matches that criterion.
    But that should be no reason for LR to force me to immediately stop the develop edits on the selected image.
    It immediately unselects, and I stay in Develop module with a grey window and the message "no image selected". (It does not move on to the next image, which still matches the criterion.)
    I would expect that when I return to Library module, it would return to the same smart collection where I started, but I would not find my last developed images there, as they no longer match the criterion.
    But that LR grabs it immediately out of my develop selection?
    Strange enough it stays the same, when I first explicitely selected all images while in Library/smart collection.
    My expectation would be that I  have this selection fixed to work on in Develop module. Similar to when I select any images from survey view and go to Develop module.
    But no, the only workaround I found is:
    Start from the smart collection, ctrl a to select all, then arbitrarily click on another collection withput this criterion - selection stays fixed - then move over to Develop module.
    This is LR4.1 on Win7.
    Definitely my functional specification would be: never take off an image from Develop unless the user moves on to another image.
    So ignore from where an image was picked.
    Would you consider this a bug? Or a "feature"?
    Do you see the same in LR4.2 or 4.3RC? Behaviour on a Mac?
    Cornelia

    There is a feature request that has been around for a long time to be able to "lock" the contents of a smart collection so you can work on the photos in it, before "releasing" it for recomputed contents.
    My workaround is to copy from smart collection to dumb (I encountered this so often that I created a 1-keystroke plugin mini-feature to help). Before that I actually used a private keyword whose presence was enough to hold a photo in a smart collection (set the keyword to work on photos, clear the keyword to release them). Then as long as you add that keyword as criteria to every smart collection you may edit in, and add the keyword to every photo in the collection that you may work on... - yuck.

  • How can I create a new catalog of all my photos with no develop adjustments?

    I use Lightroom 4.3.  I tried this by deleting the old catalog, and creating a new one, thinking that the develop adjustments would no longer exist after first deleting the old catalog.  The develop adjustments were still there.  (I deleted the catalog out of the lightroom sub-folder of My Pictures.) 
    The reason that I want to do this is that I have one folder (of about 800 important photos) where something went very wrong in Lightroom, and every time I try to pull up one of the photos my whole computer stalls.  Everything works beautifully in my other folders.  I even re-installed Lightroom.  I want to re-add those dng photos without the develop adjustments.  It doesn't bother me if none of my files have develop adjustments.  I save all of my files after they are adjusted.  I save the DNGs also. 
    Thanks,
    Jennifer

    One easy way: reset after importing (which can be done from library module - e.g. main menu, context menu, quick-develop...). If you can't even get that far, consider using exiftool to strip the xmp from DNGs and/or jpegs, or just delete xmp sidecar file in case of proprietary raw.

  • I'm trying to use iPhoto but when I put my cursor over the photo it has a small flag over the left hand corner and a downward arrow in the bottom right corner.  It won't let me pull up a photo

    I'm trying to use iphoto but when I put my cursor over a photo it has a small flag in the upper left hand corner and a downward arrow in the lower right corner.  I've used it lots but it just started doing this.  My events pull up just not a single photo.

    Try rebuilding your iPhoto Library. Here's a link:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2638

  • Sort by Develop Adjustments

    I would like to be able to sort a set of photos by those that have Develop Adjustments and those that do not.  Is this easily done?  For now, I don't want to sort by the type of adjustment.....just whether or not an image has one.
    Thanks

    I was aware of the +- badge but didn't know about the smart collection "Un-Edited."  However, I do not see that "Un-Edited" smart collection.  There is a "Without Keywords" smart collection.  Is there a way to turn on/off these default ones?  I do have LR 4.0.
    Thanks
    P.S......by the way, about my question yesterday or the day before concerning my mismatch between my laptop Catalog settings and my desktop settings.....I didn't realize I had created so many HDR files on my laptop, along with their corresponding adjustment settings.  I was originally going to just forget about these and redo them on my desktop.  However, because there are so many, I think I'm just going to have to Export all of them on my laptop with the settings and reimport into my Desktop LR.  I'll just have to wait for my backup system to go through its paces and be patient while it does!

  • Save metadata to file + Edit in PS = Reset develop adjustments?

    Hello:
    I don't know if this issue has been raised  before, since it's not easy to describe it and, hence, to perform a  search based on it. I would like to know if this is a bug or there is  some reason for it which I haven't think of yet.
    Let me explain... I use LR 3.3 to develop a raw file  as usual. Ok. Then I do "Edit in PS" to perform some pixel edition, then  back to Lr. Next, I apply some LR adjustments to the resulting file  (PSD or TIFF, depending on the preferences) that I just edited in PS. So  far, everything's fine: I can keep going back and forth between PS and  LR without trouble...
    ... but if I save metadata to  file (control+S), and then try to edit the PSD/TIFF as "original" in PS,  guess what: the file opens in PS with the LR adjustments not visible  (this is normal), but simultaneously, the develop settings for the file  are reset in Lightroom! So, to summarize:
    1) I develop a raw file using LR adjustments
    2) I edit in PS and save as PSD (or tiff, depending on the preferences)
    3) Back in LR, i apply some develop adjustments to the new PSD/TIFF file.
    4) I save metadata to file and choose "edit in PS as original"
    5) The file opens in PS, but the settings for the file are reset in LR!
    This  doesn't happen if I uncheck the "Include develop settings in metadata  in jpg, tiff and psd files" in the Metadata tab of the Catalog  preferences.
    I could record a video (screencast) if the explanation is not clear enough. Thanks in advance for your answers!

    I have recorded a screencast. For some reason, now I can't make it happen the first time around - I have had to do it twice this time (save metadata to psd file, edit in Ps, close Ps, save metadata to psd file, edit in Ps).
    I won't go into details since I think the video is pretty self explanatory. I know it's not usual to save metadata to file (including develop settings) just before editing in PS, but... is this normal, expected behavior? Am I doing something wrong without noticing? Same thing happen both in my desktop PC (Win 7 64, LR 3.3, CS5 64) and my laptop (Vista 32, LR 3.3, CS5 32).
    Thanks for your help.
    VIDEO (view fullscreen, hd, if possible): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mRnwnoCtMw

  • Lightroom 4-not retaining develop adjustments when I move to photoshop

    I have used lightroom for years-never had this issue. I am using a Pc with WIndows 8. Recently had hard drive crash so only just reinstalled lightroom in last few weeks but all was working fine until last few days. First it just wouldn't open a file I wanted in Photoshop at all. Just got stuck/ignored request. When I closed program it would not reopen progam unless I rebooted computer. Now it will take any photo into photoshop when I click photo-edit in Photoshop 5.1 but it opens the version of the file with no develop adjustments at all! It will retain a crop if I make one but that is it! Don't recall changing anything that would cause this.
    Stephanie

    That was it!  They were not in the same color space. I had to change my preferences in Lightroom under the External Editing tab and then on the "Edit in Adobe Photoshop CS6" section to match the other photos color space, which as sRGB.  I had my preference on ProPhoto RGB. 
      So for those looking for the same answer, I will make it clear for you.
        In lightroom click on "Edit" on the top left...
        then click on "Preferences" (or hot key Ctrl + ,)
        click on the "External Editing" tab......
        then on the top of the panel you will see the "Edit in Adobe Photoshop CS6" section. 
        Adjust the color space to the same color space of the other picture. (you can see that info in Photoshop on the top tab of the file). 
        The bit rate did not matter for me.  I was able to see the lightroom adjustments copied with both the 8bit and 16bit when the file I was copying to was only 8bit.  So you only need to change the color space.......most likely it will be sRGB.
    Thank you c.pfaffenbichler.     

  • Filter by photo orientation

    How can I filter by photo orientation (i.e. portrait versus landscape) within the currently shown collection or folder?

    Okay, sort by aspect ratio, then select all the images of the group you're interested in (click and shift-click) and then make them fiterable. Either add a flag or a color, or make a keyword (portrait or landscape, perhaps), or just add them to a quick collection.

  • Macbook Pro Retina 13" late 2013 My screen has developed vertical lines down the left hand side and they are multiplying

    Macbook Pro Retina 13"late 2013   2.4GHz Intel Core i5  8 GB 1600 MHz  DDR3  Intel Iris 1536MB  251 GB Flash.
    My screen has developed vertical lines down the left hand side yesterdays photo there is more today.

    You'd better make Genius Bar appointment to show them the problem.

  • Every time I open Iphoto I get the following message:  "A photo has been found in the iPhoto library that was not imported.  Do you want to import it?  Yes or No"  Any suggestions?

    Every time I open Iphoto I get the following message:  "A photo has been found in the Iphoto library that was not imported.  Does anyone have any suggestions?

    Quit iPhoto and to to the iPhoto library (by default in your pictures folder) - right click (control click) on it and select show package contents - find the folder named import (on importing) and drag it to the desktop - DO NOT MAKE ANY OTHER CHANGES - launch iPhoto and you will be fine.
    Open the import(ing) folder and if there is nothing in it that you need move it to the trash and empty the trash
    LN

  • I imported a COMPLETED book project into Aperture 3, only to discover that  the resolution of all the photos has been reduced to totally unacceptable levels

    I imported a COMPLETED book project into Aperture 3, only to discover that  the resolution of all the photos has been reduced to totally unacceptable levels.  Any easy solution?
    Steps:
    1. I finished an Aperture 2 (Two) book project and tried to submit it to Apple for printing. At that point I learned (belatedly, obviously) that Apple no longer accepts books from Aperture 2. I don't know how I would have known to even ask if Aperture 2 had been sunsetted as far as book projects go.
    2. So I tried to download Aperture 3 ($79.99), only to be told that I couldn't download Aperture 3.5.1 because I was still running OSX 10.8.x. So I read current reviews for OSX 10.9.x, and ...
    3. Downloaded and installed the current operating system (about a 3-hours process for me).  OSX 10.9.2, here we are!
    4. Then I returned to the Apple Store, found, and purchased Aperture 3.  [For safety's sake, it would sure be nice to have a .dmg file I could copy and file away.  I lost a perfectly legal and good copy of Adobe's Photoshop Elements 3 years ago because I wasn't smart enough to make a safety copy, and when my iMac crashed (fried electronic components), I was left with a copy of the software that wouldn't run, and couldn't be verified as legit.]
    5. When Aperture 3 finished installing, I found and imported my COMPLETED Aperture 2 book project, which import seemed to proceed nominally -- the right number of pages, the right content on those pages, that sort of thing -- until I started looking more carefully at the pictures themselves.  All of them, about 300 of them, have been imported into an Aperture 3 book project in such a reduced resolution that they are fuzzy at the size the book will be printed.  Screen-capture of just one example (at 100% viewer setting):
    I don't know what to do at this point to correct the problem, short of going through the entire book project, copy the custom captions (since those go away when you "delete" photo content), delete the photo, re-insert the photo, and paste back the custom caption.  Lather, rinse, repeat - ~300 times!  An estimated 2-3 hours of additional work.
    Or does anyone in this community know either (1) that I did something wrong in the Aperture 2-to-Aperture 3 import (I don't recall being offered any options or choices in the process); or (2) that there is a wholesale one-step solution to my problem?
    BTW, I tried to edit my "Product" info, but OSX 10.9.x is not in the pick list.  I am running OSX 10.9.2
    <Re-Titled By Host>

    Frank, thanks for your note.  I wrote "COMPLETED" because I had gone to a lot of effort to get the content of the book precisely as I wanted it. I would fully expect to see my level of effort and care matched by functional competence in Aperture 3 to render the book the way I created it.  Too much to ask?
    And yes, I upgraded the Aperture 2 Library first.  [Not ALL my tens of 000s of pix, because I use Lightroom selectively for photo editing. But Yes to the Aperture 2 Library.]  That step took a number of minutes, but seemed to work fine (no error messages of any kind).
    Then I opened the existing book project in Aperture 3, which followed some "magic-box" process that took a minute or so.  As I said, when that step was done, by all appearances the book was ready to submit for printing - until I examined the photos a little more closely.  You did see the blurry example I included, didn't you? That is what each and every photo looks like.
    Text-box content appears to have been rendered pertectly, for the record (including captions).
    So, ... is this result something you have heard of before?  Do you know of a one-step solution?  Or am I looking at an extended picture-by-picture fix?

  • Everytime I open iphoto, my computer tells me A photo has been found in the iPhoto Library that was not imported.  Would you like to import it.  no matter what I do, iphoto puts the pic in recovered files.  How do I fix this?

    Everytime I open iphoto, my computer tells me,  A photo has been found in the iPhoto Library that was not imported.  Would you like to import it.  If I import it, a message comes up Unreadable file, the following file could not be imported. them it tells me where the file is and it cannot be opened.  If I do not import, then it says,The photo has been placed in the folder /Users/patrick*******/Pictures/iPhoto Library Recovered Photos_4.  It will just keep adding to recvovered photos.  This drives me crazy!!!!!!!  How do I fix this?

    I had this problem some months ago and the following solution from Terrence Delvin put things right:
    Go to your Pictures Folder and find the iPhoto Library there. Right (or Control-) Click on the icon and select 'Show Package Contents'. A finder window will open with the Library exposed.
    Look there for a Folder called 'Import' or 'Importing'.
    Drag it to the Desktop. *Make no other changes*.
    Start iPhoto. Does that help?
    If it does then look inside that folder on your desktop. Does it contain anything you want? If not you can trash the folder.
    However, since connecting a memory stick to my computer, I now have the same problem again.  This time there is no folder called 'Import' or 'Importing' so what should I do?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using client_get_file_name

    I'm working on 10gAs, Forms/reports integration, I able to complete most of probs (Thanks to you guys) , Now I have one last(may be) doubt. WebUtil is installed and working properly,When I run reports using forms paramters, Is there any way to redire

  • Uploading a CSV file and getting Error ORA-01403: no data found in V4.1.1.

    I have an issue where myself and another user are unable to upload a csv file to my application using the "File Browse" page item in V4.1.1. I get the following error, "Error ORA-01403: no data found". This function was working perfectly last week pr

  • Project file location...an issue?

    I used to be warned by a supervisor to place FCP project files on the internal drive because it was worse to run the project directly from the ext. drive, even the one with the same media. (So the project file is on the computer and the media on an e

  • Reverse document-Due date false

    Hi Experts, I have an Invoice which Iam cancelling using MR8m.But in the reverse document the due date is same as the basis date. Surpursingly ,if look the reverse document using mir4,the due date is false(Same as BaseDate).If I look the document usi

  • Disco+ not getting time component on format YYYY-MM-DD HH:MI:SS

    I have a problem with several fields that have an Oracle datatype of DATE, and which have a time component. Our installation is 10GR2. The first field is SEQ_START_TIME (names are changed to protect the innocent). Like the other fields under discussi