Filtering maximum rank using rank function ?

Hi ,
I have two table emp_changes(empno(number),operation_time(timestamp),operation(varchar))
and another table emp_metadata(tablename(varchar),max_time(timestamp))(it has got one row )
using this query :
    select empno,operation,RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY empno ORDER BY operation_time) "time" from emp_changes
where empno in (select empno from emp_changes where operation_time BETWEEN (select max_time from emp_metadata) AND sysdate)I am getting this output:
EMPNO OPERATION time
8009 INSERT 1
8009 UPDATE 2
8009 DELETE 3
8010 INSERT 1
8013 INSERT 1
9001 UPDATE 1
9001 DELETE 2
can anyone please tell me how to achive this like ,I want to view only distinct empno,operation with max rank in time like:
EMPNO OPERATION
8009 DELETE
9001 DELETE
Thanks ,
Deekay

Hi, Deekay,
Analytic functions (inlcude RANK) are computed after the WHERE cluase is appled.
To use the results of an analytic function in a WHERE clause, first compute the analytic function in a sub-query, then use the value in the WHERE clause of a super-query, like this:
select     empno
,     operation
from      (     -- Begin sub-query to compute time_rank
            select  empno
            ,       operation
            ,       RANK () OVER ( PARTITION BY  empno
                                           ORDER BY      operation_time     DESC
                              )           AS time_rank
            from    emp_changes
            where   operation_time     BETWEEN (
                                                select  max_time
                                  from    emp_metadata
                         AND      sysdate
     )       -- End sub-query to compute time_rank
WHERE     time_rank     = 1
;If you'd like to post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for your data, then I could test this.
While it is possible to see which is the highest number returned by RANK, it is easier to see which is the lowest number; the lowest number is always 1. That's why I used DESCending order.

Similar Messages

  • Error using Rank function in Answers

    Hi All,
    Am trying to generate a report in Answers which lists Top Accounts with Revenue.
    I Ranked the Revenue field and it is returning me correct values. ( Rank(account.revenue) )
    But, when I try to filter on this field and restrict the rows which shows only top 10 Accounts, it is returning the following error:
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 17001] Oracle Error code: 1792, message: ORA-01792: maximum number of columns in a table or view is 1000 at OCI call OCIStmtExecute. [nQSError: 17010] SQL statement preparation failed. (HY000)
    Can any one help me on this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Imtiaz.

    Hi Joe,
    This is the Physical query generated when I use Rank function and the report is fine.
    select distinct D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14,
    D1.c15 as c15
    from
    (select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14,
    D1.c15 as c15
    from
    (select Case when D1.c1 is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY D1.c1 DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c1 as c4,
    D1.c4 as c5,
    D1.c5 as c6,
    D1.c6 as c7,
    D1.c7 as c8,
    D1.c8 as c9,
    D1.c9 as c10,
    D1.c10 as c11,
    D1.c11 as c12,
    D1.c12 as c13,
    D1.c13 as c14,
    D1.c14 as c15,
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY D1.c1, D1.c2, D1.c3, D1.c4, D1.c5, D1.c6, D1.c7, D1.c8, D1.c9, D1.c10, D1.c11, D1.c12, D1.c13, D1.c14 ORDER BY D1.c1 ASC, D1.c2 ASC, D1.c3 ASC, D1.c4 ASC, D1.c5 ASC, D1.c6 ASC, D1.c7 ASC, D1.c8 ASC, D1.c9 ASC, D1.c10 ASC, D1.c11 ASC, D1.c12 ASC, D1.c13 ASC, D1.c14 ASC) as c16
    from
    (select distinct T690.SUM_REVN_AMT as c1,
    T690.NAME as c2,
    T2216.NAME as c3,
    T690.X_PETROFAC_REVN as c4,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB as c5,
    T690.X_PERCENT_GET as c6,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB * T690.X_PERCENT_GET / nullif( 100, 0) as c7,
    T690.X_EC_PRIORITY as c8,
    T19028.LOGIN as c9,
    T690.X_COUNTRY as c10,
    T690.X_REGION as c11,
    T18311.NAME as c12,
    T18641.NAME as c13,
    T18238.NAME as c14
    from
    SIEBEL.S_BU T18238 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_USER T19028 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_OPTY T690 left outer join SIEBEL.S_STG T2216 On T690.CURR_STG_ID = T2216.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T1189 On T690.PR_DEPT_OU_ID = T1189.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18311 /* Competitor */ On T690.PR_CMPT_OU_ID = T18311.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18641 /* Partner */ On T690.PR_PRTNR_ID = T18641.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_POSTN T19114 On T690.PR_POSTN_ID = T19114.PAR_ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_BU T18280 On T690.ROW_ID = T18280.OPTY_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_X T19415 On T690.ROW_ID = T19415.PAR_ROW_ID) On T19028.PAR_ROW_ID = T19114.PR_EMP_ID) On T18238.ROW_ID = T18280.BU_ID
    ) D1
    ) D1
    where ( D1.c16 = 1 )
    ) D1
    order by c1 desc
    But When I apply Filter on this Rank column then it gives me the error. THis is the Physical query for that
    select distinct Case when D1.c1 is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY D1.c1 DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c1 as c4,
    D1.c4 as c5,
    D1.c5 as c6,
    D1.c6 as c7,
    D1.c7 as c8,
    D1.c8 as c9,
    D1.c9 as c10,
    D1.c10 as c11,
    D1.c11 as c12,
    D1.c12 as c13,
    D1.c13 as c14,
    D1.c14 as c15
    from
    (select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    D1.c6 as c6,
    D1.c7 as c7,
    D1.c8 as c8,
    D1.c9 as c9,
    D1.c10 as c10,
    D1.c11 as c11,
    D1.c12 as c12,
    D1.c13 as c13,
    D1.c14 as c14
    from
    (select T690.SUM_REVN_AMT as c1,
    T690.NAME as c2,
    T2216.NAME as c3,
    T690.X_PETROFAC_REVN as c4,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB as c5,
    T690.X_PERCENT_GET as c6,
    T690.SUM_WIN_PROB * T690.X_PERCENT_GET / nullif( 100, 0) as c7,
    T690.X_EC_PRIORITY as c8,
    T19028.LOGIN as c9,
    T690.X_COUNTRY as c10,
    T690.X_REGION as c11,
    T18311.NAME as c12,
    T18641.NAME as c13,
    T18238.NAME as c14,
    Case when T690.SUM_REVN_AMT is not null then Rank() OVER ( ORDER BY T690.SUM_REVN_AMT DESC NULLS LAST ) end as c15
    from
    SIEBEL.S_BU T18238 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_USER T19028 left outer join (
    SIEBEL.S_OPTY T690 left outer join SIEBEL.S_STG T2216 On T690.CURR_STG_ID = T2216.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T1189 On T690.PR_DEPT_OU_ID = T1189.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18311 /* Competitor */ On T690.PR_CMPT_OU_ID = T18311.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18641 /* Partner */ On T690.PR_PRTNR_ID = T18641.ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_POSTN T19114 On T690.PR_POSTN_ID = T19114.PAR_ROW_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_BU T18280 On T690.ROW_ID = T18280.OPTY_ID) left outer join SIEBEL.S_OPTY_X T19415 On T690.ROW_ID = T19415.PAR_ROW_ID) On T19028.PAR_ROW_ID = T19114.PR_EMP_ID) On T18238.ROW_ID = T18280.BU_ID
    ) D1
    where ( D1.c15 <= 10 )
    ) D1
    order by c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, c10, c11, c12, c13, c14, c15
    Thanks,
    Imtiaz

  • How to use "Rank" function  in Oracle?

    I need to display Top 15 records by using rank function.
    Here is my query...I need to pull top 15 FAQ's using the below query.. How can I use RANK function to display the Top 15 FAQ"s in the list.
    Select  distinct SUb1.FAQ,Sub1.FAQ_Hits,GU.display_Name_FMLS as displayname,ev.ParentLinkrecordid,ev.userid from User GU
    Join Event ev
    ON LOWER (ev.userid) IN (LOWER (GU.lanid), LOWER (Gu.racfid))
    Join (Select distinct sm.stem as FAQ,Sum(ev.Eventresults) as FAQ_Hits,ev.ParentLinkrecordid as Topic_ID from Event ev
    Join SubjectMatter sm
    ON (TO_CHAR (sm.smrecordid) = ev.eventdetail1) AND ev.eventdetail1 IS NOT NULL AND sm.smtype = 1
    Where (Upper(ev.eventsubtype) in (Upper('FAQ'),Upper('OPENFAQ')))
    AND TO_DATE (eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') >= TO_DATE ('20100601', 'yyyymmdd')
    and TO_DATE (eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') <= TO_DATE ('20100831', 'yyyymmdd')
    Group by sm.stem,ev.Parentlinkrecordid
    order by FAQ )sub1
    ON Sub1.Topic_ID = ev.ParentLinkrecordid)

    A few bits that I noticed in the query ...
    in (Upper('FAQ'),Upper('OPENFAQ'))1) Do you really a upper for a string which is already in upper case.
    Select distinct sm.stem as FAQ,Sum(ev.Eventresults) as FAQ_Hits,ev.ParentLinkrecordid as Topic_ID2) Do you need a distinct when you are using a GROUP function viz. SUM ?
    You rank query is as follows, I am not very good at the ANSI style JOIN so changed it slightly ... :-)
    Also notice the usage rank function in the "sub1" query.
    select distinct sub1.faq,
                    sub1.faq_hits,
                    gu.display_name_fmls as displayname,
                    ev.parentlinkrecordid,
                    ev.userid
    from user gu, event ev,
      (select rank() over (order by sum(ev.eventresults) desc) rnk,
              sum(ev.eventresults) as faq_hits,
              sm.stem as faq,         
              ev.parentlinkrecordid as topic_id
         from event ev, subjectmatter sm
        where (to_char(sm.smrecordid) = ev.eventdetail1)
          and ev.eventdetail1 is not null
          and sm.smtype = 1
          AND upper(ev.eventsubtype) in ('FAQ', 'OPENFAQ')
          and to_date(eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') >= to_date('20100601', 'yyyymmdd')
          and to_date(eventdatetime, 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') <= to_date('20100831', 'yyyymmdd')
        group by sm.stem, ev.parentlinkrecordid
        order by faq) sub1
    where lower(ev.userid) in (lower(gu.lanid), lower(gu.racfid))
      and sub1.topic_id = ev.parentlinkrecordid)
      and sub1.rnk <= 15;Like mentioned above, some sample data would have helped.

  • Prob in using rank in pl/sql ,need logic same of rank function in any way

    I have a query as of the following <br>
    <br>
    SELECT sr_no,cod_acct_no,dat_arrears_due,amt_arrear_due<br>
    FROM ( select cod_acct_no,dat_arrears_due,sum(amt_arrears_due) <br>amt_arrear_due,rank() over (partition by cod_acct_no order by <br>dat_arrears_due asc) sr_no<br>
              from arrears_table <br>
              where amt_arrears_due > 0<br>
    and dat_arrears_due <= to_date('31/10/2006','dd/mm/yyyy')<br>
    and COD_ARREAR_TYPE = 'C'<br>
         group by cod_acct_no,dat_arrears_due<br>
         ) Z <br>
    WHERE z.sr_no <=5 <br>
    <br>
    I have to use this in a cursor in pl/sql but because i have rank analytic function <br>
    I am facing a compilation error ORA-06550: error <br>
    <br>
    Can you give me a logic which gives same output as of above <br>
    <br>
    Regards<br>
    vamsi krishna<br>
    <br>
    <br>

    [1]: (Error): ORA-06550: line 5, column 28: PLS-00103: Encountered the <br>symbol "(" when expecting one of the following: , from <br>
    <br>
    My oracle version is <br>
    Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.6.0.0 - Production<br>
    PL/SQL Release 8.1.6.0.0 - Production<br>
    CORE 8.1.6.0.0 Production<br>
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 8.1.6.0.0 - Production<br>
    NLSRTL Version 3.4.1.0.0 - Production<br>
    <br>I think it is comming for rank function it self <br>
    <br> will this version support analytic (rank) function's in pl/sql cursors<br>
    Regards<br>
    vamsi krishna<br>

  • How to use RANK function ?

    Hello everyone,
    here is the query I run in sql developer using RANKFunction.
    SELECT Empno, Ename, Job, Mgr, Hiredate, Sal
    FROM
    (SELECT Empno, Ename, Job, Mgr, Hiredate, Sal,
    *RANK*() OVER
    (ORDER BY SAL Desc NULLS LAST) AS Emp_Rank
    FROM Emp
    ORDER BY SAL Desc NULLS LAST)
    WHERE Emp_Rank < 6;How I can use this query in my report in obiee or is there any replacement of RANK() function in obiee so that I can use that to get my same above result.
    Thanks

    Kuldip wrote:
    Thanks, you are absolutely correct. However, By doing this I am getting my output as whic I was not expecting.
    Students Marks Rank
    student1 95 1
    student2 95 1
    student3 93 3
    student4 93 3
    student5 91 5
    The output should be as instead
    Students Marks Rank
    student1 95 1
    student2 95 1
    student3 93 2
    student4 93 2
    student5 91 3
    Can It be done like this ?
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Kuldip on Mar 15, 2012 11:51 PMHi Boss,
    I think you copied the above scenario from this site..
    http://oracle-bi.siebelunleashed.com/articles/rank-and-dense-rank-functionsobiee/
    Then why asking how to do this? Are you testing us? Doesn't that site say how to achieve this?

  • Sql tuning using rank function

    Hi,
    Can someone help me in writing the below qry using rank() function?
    DELETE FROM stc_calllog_ext a
    WHERE a.stc_save_status = 'CT'
    AND ROWID IN (SELECT a.ROWID
    FROM stc_calllog_ext a, calllog_ext b
    WHERE a.prod_line_code= b.prod_line_code
    AND a.brand_code = b.brand_code
    AND a.model_number = b.model_number
    AND a.stc_save_status != b.stc_save_status
    AND trunc(a.stc_start_time) = trunc(b.stc_start_time)
    AND a.stc_start_time BETWEEN TRUNC(SYSDATE-8) AND TRUNC(SYSDATE)
    AND a.call_taker_userid = b.call_taker_userid
    AND a.cons_telephone_no =b.cons_telephone_no
    )

    With the information you have provided, I've come up with the following.
    SELECT A.ACCOUNT_NO, A.PAYMENT_TYPE, A.INSTALLMENT_TYPE, A.DATE_CHANGE
    FROM
        (SELECT account_no, payment_type, installment_type, date_change,
                LEAD( (payment_type), 1)
                     over (partition by account_no order by account_no, DATE_CHANGE)  LEAD_PAY,
                LEAD( (installment_type), 1)
                     over (partition by account_no order by account_no, DATE_CHANGE)  LEAD_INST
          from T_ACCNTS ) A
    WHERE A.PAYMENT_TYPE <> NVL(A.LEAD_PAY,99)
       OR A.INSTALLMENT_TYPE <> NVL(A.LEAD_INST,99)
    ORDER BY 1, 4;

  • @Rank function using EVALUATE

    Hi short question,
    I'm trying to get the @rank function to work in combination with OBIEE 10.1.3.4 (using EVALUATE). Anyone here already tried using this with Essbase version 9.2? In some of the documentation it states this can not be done using anything below Essbase 9.3 but the @Rank function is available within v9.2 Is there any limit on using this from the OBIEE side?
    I used this reference:
    (how to:) http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/oracle-bi-ee-101332-handling-sort-order-in-hyperion-essbase-931-evaluate-and-mdx/
    (Essbase 9.2 doc --> @Rank available) http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12032_01/doc/epm.921/html_techref/techref.htm
    Evaluate function I'm trying to launch is:
    EVALUATE(’RANK(%1.dimension.currentmember,%2.members)’ AS INTEGER,Period."PeriodGen4",Period."PeriodGen4")
    Am I doing something wrong here, or am I trying to do things which can't be done?
    Thanks in advance,
    Mathijs

    I tried the syntax
    EVALUATE ('RANK(%1,%2)' as integer,"Account"."Gen4,Account Default","Account"."Gen4,Account Default")
    but still i am getting the error as:-
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 96002] Essbase Error: Syntax error in input MDX query on line 6 at token 'RANK' (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT s_0, s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5, s_6, s_7 FROM ( SELECT 0 s_0, "FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen3,Account Default" s_1, "FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen4,Account Default" s_2, "FINRPTC#1"."FinancialYear"."Gen2,FinancialYear" s_3, "FINRPTC#1"."Period"."Gen3,Period" s_4, EVALUATE ('RANK(%1,%2)' as integer,"FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen4,Account Default","Account"."Gen4,Account Default") s_5, "FINRPTC#1"."FINRPTC"."Actual" s_6, REPORT_AGGREGATE("FINRPTC#1"."FINRPTC"."Actual" BY "FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen3,Account Default","FINRPTC#1"."Account"."Gen4,Account Default","FINRPTC#1"."FinancialYear"."Gen2,FinancialYear","FINRPTC#1"."Period"."Gen3,Period") s_7 FROM "FINRPTC#1" WHERE (("FinancialYear"."Gen2,FinancialYear" = 'FY12') AND ("Period"."Gen3,Period" = 'Nov') AND ("Account"."Gen3,Account Default" = 'Net Cost of Services')) ) djm

  • Rank function use in MDX

    Hi Expert,
    Could you please let me know how can I use rank function in MDX to achieve the result in below format. Highest value should be ranked as 1
    Actual/Expected Dataset appears as:
    Thanks Chandan

    Hi C,
    You can use the mdx RANK() function. For example, this query has ranking of cities by sales amount. You could create two sets, and two calcs with RANK() functions for your challenge.
    WITH
    SET OrderedCities AS Order
    ([Geography].[City].[City].members
    , [Measures].[Reseller Sales Amount], BDESC
    MEMBER [Measures].[City Rank] AS Rank
    ([Geography].[City].CurrentMember, OrderedCities)
    SELECT {[Measures].[City Rank],[Measures].[Reseller Sales Amount],[Measures].[City Rank]} ON 0
    ,[Geography].[City].[City].MEMBERS
    ON 1
    FROM [Adventure Works]
    Hope that helps,
    Richard

  • Compile forms error because using rank function

    Hi,
    Oracle Form 9i don't known rank function in my SQL statement. When compile forms, it alerts err message: "Encountered the symbol "(" when expecting one ..."
    code:
    select * from (
    select group_id, acct_no, acct_desc, rank() over(order by acct_no desc) rank_no from customer
    where group_id='002'
    ) where rank_no< 10000
    Help me ASAP.
    Many thank,
    Bum.

    Where is INTO clause ? Plz provide the actual code you are writing.
    I think this type of queries not supported in Forms 9i.....try forms 10g or above.

  • Rank function

    how to use the RANK function in oracle data integrator??

    Hi,
    a little google could help you..
    https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2158588
    Let us know

  • Rank Function taking a long time to execute in SAP HANA

    Hi All,
    I have a couple of reports with rank function which is timing out/ or taking a really long time to execute, Is there any way to get the result in less time when rank functions are involved?
    the following is a sample of how the Query looks,
    SQL 1:
    select      a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over(partition by a.column1 order by sum(b.column2) asc)
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analyticview1"         b
                    join          "Table1"            a
                      on          (a.column2 = b.column3)
    group by  a.column1,
    b.column1;
    SQL 2:
    select    a.column1,
                    b.column1,
                    rank () over( order by min(b.column1) asc) WJXBFS1
    from         "_SYS_BIC"."Analytic view2"         b
                    cross join                "Table 2"               a
    where      (a.column2  like '%a%'
    and b.column1  between 100 and 200)
    group by  a.column1,
                    b.column1
    when I visualize the execution plan,the rank function is the one taking up a longer time frame. so I executed the same SQL without the rank() or partition or order by(only with Sum() in SQL1 and Min() in SQL 2) even that took a around an hour to get the result.
    1.Does anyone have an any idea to make these queries to execute faster?
    2. Does the latency have anything to do with the rank function or could it be size of the result set?
    3. is there any workaround to implement these rank function/partition inside the Analytic view itself? if yes, will this make it give the result faster?
    Thank you for your help!!
    -Gayathri

    Krishna,
    I tried both of them, Graphical and CE function,
    It is also taking a long time to execute
    Graphical view giving me the following error after 2 hr and 36 minutes
    Could not execute 'SELECT ORDER_ID,ITEM_ID,RANK from "_SYS_BIC"."EMMAPERF/ORDER_FACT_HANA_CV" group by ...' in 2:36:23.411 hours .
    SAP DBTech JDBC: [2048]: column store error: search table error:  [2620] executor: plan operation failed
    CE function - I aborted after 40 mins
    Do you know the syntax to declare local variable to use in CE function?

  • Rank function in a crosstab

    I'm trying to rank products based on the order in which they have been bought (by purchase date).
    I figured out I could use the Rank function. First problem was that Rank doesn't seem to work on Dates. I have come across this issue by using the DaysBetween function to calculate the days inbetween the first purchase date and today. This gives me a measure that I can use within the Rank function.
    Works fine for single Dimention values. However, when I create a cross-tab with multiple values on top, this doesn't work anylonger.
    See the example that shows where it goes wrong: [http://www.littlesister.com/example.xls]
    Does anyone have any idea how to solve this?
    Thanks,
    Paul

    Paul,
    In the crosstab with the multiple values remove the sort on the rank (if it is still on) and put a break on the object which shows the data for Americas, AP, EMEA and WW.
    That should show the correct ranking (at least it does in an example I build myself).
    Regards,
    Harry

  • RANK Function in AIX vs Windows

    I am facing an issue where when I run my report using my windows machine I am able to get the right results with the RANK function. However, when I ran the same report in my AIX machine, I got the following error:
    Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
    Error Details
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 378077472. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46008] Internal error: File server/Query/Optimizer/ServiceInterfaceMgr/Src/SQOIGeneratorBuiltIn.cpp, line 3403. (HY000)
    If anyone has run into this, please let me know.
    Thanks.

    One point to make is the Rank function works if you create 1 column with the RANK function in Answers(i.e. Rank(Fact.Sales) ). The issue comes up when you try to create a BIN column to bucket the RANKs in a seperate column.
    Here's the SQL:
    SELECT Location.Location saw_0, case WHEN RANK(Metrics.Sales) BETWEEN 1 AND 5 then '1-5' WHEN RANK(Metrics.Sales) BETWEEN 5 AND 10 then '5-10' else 'other' end saw_1, Metrics.Sales saw_2, RANK(Metrics.Sales) saw_3 FROM "Rank Prototype" ORDER BY saw_0
    So Basically, the issue is when you have a Bucketed Rank Sales Column and a simple Rank Column in the same request. (In AIX the issue exists, in Windows there is no issue.)

  • Filter on Rank function 10g

    Hi Friends,
    Need your help. Please!!!
    I have used the RANK function to know the different Start, end date period for a Enrollment.NO.
    What I want next is to show only the Enroll No, start, end date for a Enrollment No. with the earliest start date, end date. i.e Max(Rank) for that enrollment No.
    for RANK column I have used the function RANK("Start Date" by "EnRoll No")
    EnRoll No.      Start Date,      End Date,                  Rank
    BAD-002     01-Oct-12     31-Dec-12     1
              01-Jul-12     30-Sep-12     2
              01-Apr-12     30-Jun-12     3
    RIS-401     01-Dec-06     28-Feb-07     1
              01-Sep-06     30-Nov-06     2
              01-Jun-06     31-Aug-06     3
              01-Mar-06     31-May-06     4
              01-Dec-05     28-Feb-06     5
              01-Sep-05     30-Nov-05     6
              01-Jun-05     31-Aug-05     7
              01-Mar-05     31-May-05     8
              01-Dec-04     28-Feb-05     9
    RCB-235     01-Dec-08     28-Feb-09     1
              01-Sep-08     30-Nov-08     2
              01-Jun-08     31-Aug-08     3
              01-Mar-08     31-May-08     4
              01-Dec-07     29-Feb-08     5
              01-Sep-07     30-Nov-07     6
              01-Jun-07     31-Aug-07     7
              01-Mar-07     31-May-07     8
              01-Dec-06     28-Feb-07     9
              01-Sep-06     30-Nov-06     10
              01-Jun-06     31-Aug-06     11
              01-Mar-06     31-May-06     12
              01-Dec-05     28-Feb-06     13
              01-Sep-05     30-Nov-05     14
    My desired output is:
    EnRoll No.     Start Date     End Date     Rank
    BAD-002     01-Apr-12     30-Jun-12     3
    RIS-401     01-Dec-04     28-Feb-05     9
    RCB-235     01-Sep-05     30-Nov-05     14
    Please help me. Its urgent. I am struck at this point.
    Many Thanks in advance.
    Aachala

    Hi Aachala,
    Add the following to your filter and you should be all set...
    MAX(RANK("Start Date" by "EnRoll No") by "EnRoll No") = RANK("Start Date" by "EnRoll No") by "EnRoll No")
    JB

  • Rank function breaks drill down 11g

    I have a simple drill down report standard hierarchy and am having a weird issue with the rank function.
    This report works on 10g but the upgraded 11g version does not.
    When I drill down past the 2nd level it adds an is null filter to the revenue column.  This is also the column we are using to base our rank function.
    If I move the rank column to the first or last position in the table the drills work perfectly.  If I move it to the second column it breaks on the first drill instead of the 2nd.
    It works perfectly if drilling on the headings instead of the values.  That seems to point to some sort of null coming through when being passed.  I've tried using an ifnull and a case statement and neither method works, it just applies the is null filter to the entire column formula.
    The client doesn't want to change the position of the rank column so that work around will not do.  Any ideas?

    A similar thread was recently talked about here:
    In OBIEE charts, how do you make drill downs work on custom formulas?
    With a calculated column, you need to make sure the source query and destination query have the EXACT same formula and the same name for the field. If it is not 100% identical, it may not work correctly. (I typically use the NAVIGATE function to get to the second query rather than the Drill function.)
    Now in some cases, if you try to create a second drill down query with more details in it, the original formula doesn't work the way you want it to. The calculated formulas have to make sense in both source query and destination query in order to work properly. If you have a ranking of the Top 5 Products in the source query, the destination query also has to have the same ranking of Top 5 products in order to work. If you add more fields into the destination query (e.g., adding on product attributes, or # of records associated with that product name etc.), then sometimes the ranking / aggregation in the destination doesn't add up the same way. This causes the system to think that the formulas are different and prevents the drill down.
    I managed to get around this by having a 3rd query in between the original summary view and the detailed data view. So the sequence would be (for example):
    - Dashboard based summary query (including the calculated ranked product names formula)
    - drill down into virtually identical query (add on one slight bit of difference here, for example adding on a second Product Name field ... not a calculated version, but the actual name). Create a drill down this time by clicking on the regular Product Name field (don't drill down on the custom formula)
    - final detailed drill-down query
    You can format this intermediary drill down query to explain to users that they need to click a second time.
    It's not ideal, but it should work. Hope this helps.
    Ted

Maybe you are looking for