Final Cut Studio 2 on a MBP

I have a couple questions regarding the MBP capability and performance when working with all the programs in FC studio 2. Thanks ahead of time to any and all of you who reply, your knowledge is greatly appreciated.
Please keep in mind all of these questions are in regards to performance or capability with final cut studio 2.
I am very set on a MBP as opposed to the mac pro desktop, but does the MBP have any hick ups when trying to work in any of FC studio 2?
From what I have read most people say the 2.4 to 2.6 upgrade is not worth it is this still true if you plan on working in FC studio 2?
I plan on purchasing a 2 gig model and adding 2 more gigs my self, any recommendations as far as a company or site or both is again greatly appreciated.
15 inch or 17 inch, and why or why not?
160GB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm or 200GB Serial ATA Drive @ 7200 rpm, again why or why not?
From what I have read you want to go with antiglare as opposed to glossy because it throws off the true color, is this correct?
Is the higher resolution upgrade for the 17inch worth it?
thank you again,
John

hi lots of questions hope this helps
i have the MBP 2.4 15 inch
i have not found any problems with my MBP so far except the size of the hdd once ive installed all my apps i found with a lo o customizing out 0f my 160gb i have about 40gb left after i installed everything including the full FCS-2
the speed is great not as good as a mac pro tho but it is a portable compatible tho.
i have upgraded my 2gb to 4gb you will need to buy 2x 2gb sodimm sticks i found mine on ebay quite cheap and a decent make aswell. it does help with booting up and FCP running.
i have the 15 inch as it is easier to carry round to uni and clients, 17 inch is big and bulky
200gb would be better but 160gb will do, use a external hdd as a scratch disk the bigger the better and firewire 400 atleast 800 is better
yes the glossy screen will do funny things with the picture and shine in day light, glossy is great for watching dvd's but not editing.
the higher res would be great but you can get away with a 15 inch res but FCS color does work best with a HD res screen
all in all i hope that helps
have fun

Similar Messages

  • Can I move Final Cut Studio from a MBP to a new iMac?

    I'm buying a new iMac tomorrow and I want to be sure that I can move Final Cut Studio from my Macbook Pro over to the new iMac. I have all of the original install DVD's and serial numbers and so on. Just a customer wanting to make an informed purchase.
    Thanks,
    Hunter Hanson

    It should install without problems.
    x

  • MBP and final cut studio 2?

    I have the latest MBP 2.66 with 4 gb of ram and im buying final cut studio 2 and was wondering if it will run fine? I also was wondering if 4 gb of ram is enough? Or should i upgrade to 6 gb of ram? thank you! Can i also edit FULL HD video and still run ok?

    I'm running FCS2 on the latest MCP 17" with 2.66, 4gb and faster drive. Any other upgrades just weren't worth the cash when considering bang for our buck.
    If you haven't already, you will need some hefty external drive space, especially when you start working with FCP. I have a Taurus Super-S Combo with two 1TB drives in mirror config. I have this device mapped via an eSATA2 express card.
    So far all seems good.
    I'm currently shooting on a Sony A1 in DVCAM mode. I haven't put any HD into it yet, so maybe someone else can help in that regard.

  • How can I install Final Cut Studio 2 on my new MacBook Pro with Lion?

    I just purchased and received a new 15" MacBook Pro (non-retina) last week. I need to install Final Cut Studio 2 on this computer. I have researched this and found that I need to install Rosetta from the Snow Leopard DVD in order to do this. This is the first Mac I've bought ( although I've been working with them for years), so I don't have a Snow Leopard DVD. I am a high school teacher and we use FCS 2 for my classes so buying FCP X is not a viable option for me since I teach FCP 6. The iMacs we use in school run Leopard and were never upgraded to Snow Leopard (budget cuts and all), so I can't even borrow one from my district.
    Does anyone know how I can obtain Rosetta? Or another way to install this without it?
    Thank you ! :)

    There is no way to add Rosetta support because it is not supported by OS X Lion at system level. This has been documented before the release of OS X Lion by itself.
    If you really need Final Cut Studio 2, I would return your computer if possible, and purchase a Mac that is capable of running Snow Leopard (all 2010 models, early 2011 MBP and some other 2011 models)

  • Final Cut Studio 2 on iMac to be purchased

    I am a first-time computer buyer, so I'm trying to make sure this purchase is going to be worth it. I'm looking to purchase the iMac off the shelf, but I'm uncertain if I need extra accessories to make Final Cut Studio 2 run. The Mac says it has "ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro Graphics processor with 256 MV of GDDR3 memory," and the software requirements say it needs, "An AGP or PCI Express Quartz Extreme graphics card (Final Cut Studio is not compatible with integrated Intel graphics processors)." Will I be required to buy a separate graphics card, or will the computer support it as is? If I need additional hardware, what specifically do I need?

    I can offer a different perspective about a MAC for video editing. I used to believe that a Tower MAC was the only option for various video formats but since the landscape for current video cameras have changed, I now rely almost exclusively on a MacBook Pro.
    The MBP has several advantages for attaching various adapters for competent video chores. The Express 34 slot can access two 7200 rpm SATA drives that can be RAID 0 and the MBP has Firewire 400-800 and USB 2.0 connections.
    Since I use a P2 camera, I have capability of using FW connection to download clips or use a Express 34 (PCMCIA-EXP34) adapter for P2 capture. If you are using a DV camera you can capture from Firewire and capture to either FW 800 drive or the eSATA drives. You could even connect an MX0/MX02 to the Firewire for color correction.
    Finally, you can utiize a 23" or even a 30" Cinema Display thru the DVI port as the current MBP's have great video cards.

  • Final cut studio 2 and macbook pro 17?

    I'm anxious to purchase Final Cut Studio 2, and a new MacBook Pro 17" laptop. Is FCS2 and this laptop 100% compatible? Will I be able to install and run FCS2 on this laptop successfully?
    Laptop specs:
    MacBook Pro 17" Notebook 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 3 GB RAM, 160 GB Hard Drive, TI Mobility Radeon X1600 graphics processor, dual -ink DVI support, 256MB of GDDR3 SDRAM, external 500G hard drive for video storage (firewire 800).
    MacBook Pro 17"   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    Well those that have tried running FCS 2 on a 17" laptop can't talk. It's not released yet...
    However there is no reason why it shouldn't work well. Add an Io HD to the mix, and you'll edit HD on it all day long... we were showing this in the AJA booth at NAB a couple of weeks ago. Apple was running it too on laptops in their booth...
    Figure it should be fine. With the advent of Pro Res, there's little you couldn't edit on a MBP... however there are some things you'll not be editing with it, such as 2 k files, or uncompressed HD. Pro res takes care of that though. It's really visually lossless.
    Jerry

  • Mac Book Pro and final cut studio 2

    Hi,
    Bought a MBP last year and am looking to purchase Final Cut Studio 2 Universal. After looking through some discussions I'm still unsure how well this package will run with my setup. Yes it will be fine, or yes it will run but with some limitations, or yes it will run but I should get a different video card, etc.....? A definate yes or no would be appreciated and any limitations or known issues. I will be using a120GB external hard drive for my video footage.
    Thanks, Mick
    Sorry if this is posted in the wrong area or if these questions have been answered. I'm new to Macs and forums and wouldn't like to spend that much cash on a maybe!
    Mac Book Pro 15   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   Intel core duo 2.16 GHz 2GB ram/Radeon X1600 256Mb 80GB hard drive

    Yes, it will be fine.
    The only limitation is Color which needs an external screen with at least 1650x1050 to be kind of useful though it runs at smaller resolutions.

  • What Mac to get for Final Cut Studio?

    I've been doing most of my video editing for the last year or so in Sony Vegas on a PC. I'm looking to get into it a bit more seriously and want to make the switch to Final Cut Studio.
    Can I run it on a Macbook Pro? Can I run it WELL on a Macbook Pro? Currently I'm running Sony Vegas on a PC with a Q9350 quad-core CPU, 4gb ram, and an 8800GT graphics card, and I'm not fully satisfied with the way it runs (encoding times are fine, but it's difficult to preview within the software with any semi-complex effects added). What should I be looking for in terms of processing speed and whatnot here? Could I get away with the 13 or 15 inch Macbook pros and still run things well?
    Hard drive size is not an issue, as everything will be archived to a server.

    This isn't the thread in post in.
    Try here
    http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=939
    It depends on which MBP, what type of video you are editing, and other factors.
    Remember as well that FCS3 2009 includes FCP, DVDSP, Compressor, Color, Motion, and Cinema Tools, some of which are GPU based in part.

  • Lost 1 final cut studio install disk

    hi
    i have my serial number and all install disk except dvd pro.  just can't find it.
    final cut studio 5 bought in 2006
    mbp 17'
    running snow leopard 10.6.8
    what can i do?
    thanks

    Hi Shane
    i was doing a fresh install of FCS because i had done a clean install of snow leopard on a 15" mbp
    informed through reading in this discussion forum that it is always better to fresh install applications rather than migrate them
    then i found i was missing the DVD SP disk - so i did the FCS install unchecking dsp and qmaster.
    after the FCS install i don't see DVD SP in applications folder.  [or am i missing something?]
    YOu can install and use DVD SP in the basic way, just no themes.  And you can have the installer not ask for the content by doing a custom install and unchecking it.
    on a 17" mbp - i do have both   - APPLE QM and DVD SP -  - i am just about to do a clean snow leopard install on this one too.  but first have just "plain" installed SL so that the 2 mbp have the same OS so i can miigrate files back and forth - or forth and back.
    will a migrated DVD SP and a migrated QM work with the reinstall of the rest of FCS for which i do have the original disks [with a software update to bring them to the same version 5.1.4?]

  • What's in the Final Cut Studio 2 Box?

    I have Final Cut Studio 2.0.1. Retail version. I got it with a 2nd hand MBP I bought recently, and I plan to sell FCS2. I have no need for it, iMovie is fine for me.
    But I don't have the big fancy box or manuals or ? included... what is meant to be in the box?
    I do have...
    - 9 installation CDs in the small black apple box.
    - Final Cut Studio Software License agreement.
    - 'Installing Your Software' documentation with serial numbers.
    - Apple Software 'Proof of Purchase' coupons.
    If anyone has FCS2 and can tell me what I'm missing, I can advertise it more effectively and truthfully! Thanks.

    Basically, you're not missing anything; most of the documentation is electronic. Click here for a complete list of the box's contents.
    (48613)

  • Can I use Final Cut Studio 3 - notably FCP 7 - on the lastest MacBook Pro (non Retina) (Z0MV-27-4GB-512-HRA Apple 15" MacBook Pro/2.7GHz Quadcore Intel Core i7/8 GB) running OS 10.8?

    Can I use Final Cut Studio 3 - notably FCP 7 - on the lastest MacBook Pro (non Retina) (Z0MV-27-4GB-512-HRA Apple 15" MacBook Pro/2.7GHz Quadcore Intel Core i7/8 GB) running OS 10.8?  If not, is there a work-around if I have to revisit work done in FCS 3?

    I have it running on the latest NON-Retina MBP. And a good friend of mine has it running on his Retina model. Works fine.
    Henry English wrote:
    What if I have to revisit any one of them?  What if I try FCP X and find I prefer FCS 3?
    If you need to revisit them...that's why you install FCS3.  That's really the only reason I have that on my system, to revisit old projects, and to deal with clients who still use FCP 7.
    You really should look at moving on though...not sticking with FCP7. It's 4 years old...two years since it was EOL.  Adobe Premiere Pro CC is a very good FCP replacement...although I don't like their "rental" method of paying a subscription to use it.  Or you can buy Adobe CS6...but that just lacks enough to make it not quite tempting for me.  Premiere CC is spot on...but **** if I don't hate that subscription model.  But there's also Avid Media Composer.  But that doesn't do a lot of things that I used FCP and Adobe for...

  • Final cut studio and macbook pro

    hi i have final cut studio 2 currently installed on my imac, and it kinda slows my general use of the computer
    i bought a new macbook pro (the new one with aluminum casing), but its only the base, and i have not upgraded it in any way, so it is as it comes
    and basically i was wondering, if i installed the entire final cut studio 2 (and aperture), how would it affect the general speed of the machine when doing other general tasks not FCS related:
    a) while FCS is running
    and b) while it is not running
    i also want to run games off of my MBP so i really dont want to compromise speed

    It needs to be filled with RAM, and when running Pro Apps, in the faster graphics processor mode. Mail, etc. will likely run fine along side them. I'd not play games when rendering though.
    When they don't run, they don't affect anything but disk space 60 gigs for it all including Templates... RAM is the key to running multiple apps on any given Mac.
    Nice Mac too. I just saw one the other day for the first time. I love that new trackpad the most. It's likely a lot faster than my 2.3 laptop, and I can run all the apps at the same time no problem with it. But ya need to fill up the RAM. I like that it's so green.
    Jerry

  • How well does Final Cut Studio run with 3gb of ram? Macbook Pro 2.33mhz

    I have a 2.33mhz (Model a1211) Macbook Pro. I've maxed out the ram to 4gb but because of the motherboard restrictions (that I still don't quite understand) it can only use 3GB.
    I've read on the FCS specs that the minimum is requirement is 1GB but Apple recommends 4GB.
    I cut mainly short 3 to 5 minute pieces with AVCHD video decoded with up to 60-90 minutes of footage.
    Will I have any serious issues with any of the Final Cut Studio Programs that I should be aware of?
    I'm obviously not expecting Mac Pro results but If it doesn't run very well with 3GB, I might have to rethink my purchase. If it is just a "hiccup" now and then with waiting for video to start or such, I will deal.
    Thanks
    Bryan
    <Edited by Host>

    Motion is gfx intensive. Meaning that the lower the gfx card, the lower the performance. You should expect little-to-no realtime performance from Motion on the system mentioned with even basic-to-remotely-intermediate animations. CPU RAM will make a difference in the amount of total frames that you can render in a RAM preview, but it will not affect realtime performance. With your proposed system: add a particle, a lower third text, a replicator with 5,000 points, a light with some shadows, and a reflection (and this is one of each mind you, not multiple instances) and expect around a * less than * 1-3 fps playback in draft quality with %50-%25 playback resolution. Then expect to wait up to a minute or more with the beachball of death for each parameter change. No joke either. Good luck fine-tuning your moderate-to-even-remotely-complex animation with your desired system.
    If working in Motion is your desire, then focus on the graphics card. Unfortunately you can not upgrade your gfx card on the MBP, so you should consider selling your MBP and investing in a Mac Pro. You can upgrade the gfx card in the Mac Pro and obtain optimal performance from Motion. Otherwise you'll literally be stuck in the mud with your animations.

  • Macbook 2.0 and Final Cut Studio?

    I need a notebook computer for traveling as supplement to my G5 dual 2.5 G5.
    I would like to just go for a Macbook. It looks to be a snazzy computer at a very good price. But I've heard that the graphic card is not really sufficient for Pro applications.
    So my question is: Can Final Cut Studio be run succsessfully on a Macbook 2.0 GHz with 2 GB of RAM?
    Dual 2.5, 4.5 GB RAM, 30" Cinema Display,   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    While the other responses are correct in that you will see somewhat better performance with a MBP, I have to tell you that the MacBook can run FCS perfectly well. I own both the MacBook and the MacBook Pro and I am running FinalCut Studio on both. The performance gains on the MacBook Pro are very marginal, and I would not consider them enough to justify the higher pricetag. Now for a more graphics-intense app like Motion, or Shake, yes, the Pro will be required. But for your situation, wanting to make some edits and do some work in FCS on the road, the MacBook will be fine. I would suggest a RAM upgrade to at least 1 gig, and optimally 2 gigs. Good Luck!

  • Does new MacBookPro 13" (Apr2010) run all Final Cut Studio applications?

    Does the new MacBookPro 13" (April 2010) run all Final Cut Studio applications, and reasonably well?
    I've looked at the FCS specs, CPU, RAM and hard disc minimums are more than satisfied with the MBP 13".
    Now that the 13" has a discreet Nvidia (albeit sharing memory with main RAM) graphics card, that requirement is also satisfied.
    The Color app needs a screen resolution of at least 1680x1050: Is this really a hard requirement?
    i.e. will the Color app exit with an error message saying not supported at this resolution or will it work but with less space for items in its user interface? For example Adobe Premiere Pro 1.5 used to say minimum resolutions but I can run it on my Toshiba NB100 netbook at 1024x600 just fine. (BTW as an aside even this 200pound netbook has an eSATA port!)
    Also I intend to use an external 23" 1920x1080 screen plugged into the MBP13" a lot of the time at home.
    Also what about the Core 2 Duo on the 13" versus the i5 dual core hyperthreaded = 4 threads or i7 quad core = 8 threads on the new (Apr2010) 15" and 17" MBPs.
    I intend to capture from solid state flash card, so dropped frames due to slow(is) internal 5400rpm non-raid hard drive capturing from real time playout of tape is not an issue.
    Where would I notice the difference in speed? Where would the MBP 13" run noticeably slower compared with the new 15" and 17"?
    I would expect the entry 2.4Ghz 13" Apr2010 model to run FCS/FCP reasonably well, given that people have coped with this sort of spec in the past.
    As long as editing works reasonably smoothly on the 13" MPB, e.g. I can go backwards and forwards through my work, preview multiple tracks/effects (at lower resolution, if necessary - by using RTExtreme feature with ProRes422Proxy) and then leave it render to maximum high quality overnight, then I would be happy.
    The smaller size of the 13" and lower cost make it more attractive to gain a more rounded cross platform skillset by entering into the Mac scene and for future opportunities requiring those skills.
    The benefits buying a higher end notebook diminish against cost and increasing screen size (more to carry around), also that only the cumbersome (IMHO) 17" has ExpressCard34 for SATA input.

    Thanks for your quick response and for the reassurance, my responses back...
    {quote:title=NLEdit wrote:}
    What sorts of things did you want to work on?
    {quote}
    Music videos, small projects to start with. I've come from working with Adobe Premiere Pro 1.5 on Windows XP on a 30minute documentary that took 18months part and fulltime to produce with 3 staff (http://www.youtube.com/mediamotioninvision for a clip of it). I feel the next level up would be to work with what many professionals are using: Final Cut Studio, as I was told at Cannes Film Festival in 2009. So to progress my craft I want to develop the skillset of the professionals.
    {quote:title=NLEdit wrote:}
    You also have to consider the i/o issue. How will you get footage in and out of the machine to an external drive and from a firewire camera if you go that route?
    {quote}
    Many film/video cameras, both low end/entry level consumer prosumer and higher end professional are recording onto solid state flash memory cards, e.g. SD. So transferring from that into the notebook is straightforward. This used to be more of an issue with tape-based cameras, as the footage transfer was real time and dropped frames could occur if the host recieving notebook could not handle the amount of data be sent from the camera, e.g due to slow hard drive/bus.
    That said, even though solid state media eliminates the problem of dropped frames due to real time transfer of tape, it is a profound crying shame of a misguided decision that Apple decided to omit the ExpressCard34 interface (and therefore block high-speed eSATA/RAID hard drive options) from the 'Pro' range of 13" and 15" MacBookPros and reserve it for the 17", when the equivalent Windows notebooks have this for half the price.
    So I'm reluctant to invest more money in a higher spec machine 1) because of limited budget 2) but also the higher spec 15" appears to be sadly unbalanced in that there is up to quad core of processing power etc but a lacking in external interfaces i.e. maximum of FireWire 800 for connecting external drives to. More better in my view to spend just enough on a 'sketch' grade notebook, for learning on and reasonable performance and benefit from the smaller size and cost.
    Playback, previewing while editing the work may be a little compromised owing to the throughput of the internal harddrive, but, from my reading, I understand that RTExtreme and ProRes422Proxy technologies can help this situation of limited hard drive bandwidth/transfer rate whereby lower bitrates are used combined with reduction in preview quality to allow smoother playback. That is acceptable to me as long as I can get a good idea of how it looks. I intend to leave it running overnight to do the final maximum high quality render.

Maybe you are looking for

  • PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'FND_REQUEST$SUBMI

    I am trying to submit the payables open interface import program using BPEL process. BUT I am unable to submit the concurrent program. The invoke function is failing with below message. [2010/08/25 17:06:22] Faulted while invoking operation "OFAPOPII

  • Reject Purchase order using abap OO class CL_PO_HEADER_HANDLE_MM

    Hi all, We have created a webdynpro application for maintaining purchase order by using class CL_PO_HEADER_HANDLE_MM. With this class we are able to release (method RELEASESTATE_MM~RELEASE)  or cancel release.. We are trying, in vain,  to reject purc

  • Java 7 won't work with Firefox 16.0.1 on OS X 10.7.5.

    Java 7 works with Safari, but Firefox won't recognise Java is there at all. I've tried reinstalling Java 7 but no success.

  • Deploying a Portlet into Weblogic

    Hi Folks, I have a basic question about deploying a portlet into weblogic. I created a simple JSF/ADF application and used the Portlet Bridge to "Portletize" it. When I run the application using JDev11 everything works fine, but If I try to deploy it

  • "information required for activation couldn't be obtained"

    Hey, my (original, 16gb) phone was working fine all day. I started to download 2.1, and tried to add some movies (I have manual synch enabled) when I got an unknown error message. I ok'd, and continued on, and now whenever I connect my phone, I get a