Final entry indicator in SES

Hi Gurus,
I would like to ask if there's a way to set the "final entry" indicator on accepted SES without revoking its acceptance. We have lots of SES that we need to set as final entry so that it would not appear as "open" on Purchase Orders.
Any help is greatly appreaciated.
Thanks and Best Regards,
MM

Mr. Uttkarsh Agrawal,
It seems you dont understand where I am coming from. I'm using the field delivery compeleted indicator as an indicator whether a particular PO is OPEN or CLOSED. It is working fine for standard items since that field is open. Now, since that field is hidden for SERVICE PO and we cannot set it manually, we have to set it on the SES in which we cannot just set unless we revoke the acceptance. Thus, this posted message here.
MM

Similar Messages

  • Final entry indicator

    Hi gurus,
    please tell me the process( path) to enable final entry indicator while creating the service entry sheet.
    Rgds

    Read all the replies in the below link
    Re: Final entry in service entry sheet

  • Service entry sheet can't be changed to update the final entry indicator

    Hi All,
    Can any body suggest possible reason and a solution for the below?
    I am having a situation in which for a service P.O for which partial service enty has been done and for that invoice has also been done.(In production)
    Now when I am trying to close the P.O line item by going to service entry sheet by t.code ml81n there i am not able to get the change icon , and hence i am not able to revoke the acceptance of service entry and subsequently I couldn't be able to set the final entry for that.
    I tried to do the simulate the same senario in development(testing client) server and it is working fine, could any one sugget the reason and solution how to close the service line item in the P.O .
    Regards,
    Sushanta

    Hi,
    That was useful but I checked some other service P.O and for them I am able to see the change icon.
    the p.o in my earlier mail are old one of 2002, but they are having partial service entry and invoice against them,
    Could any one please tell me under what circumstances I will not be able to see the change icon in the service entry sheet?
    Is it if the service entry is done at an old date, i mean earlier date or any other reason.
    please let me know soon
    Thanks
    Sushanta

  • Final Entry marked without any service entry

    Dear Gurus,
    I have a service PO with 2 line item, and same service number.
    Service entry for the first line item has been successfully created, however when I try to create the SES for the 2nd line item I get the error "Not possible to enter services ("final entry" indicator set)".
    There is no PO history for this line item. In EKPO table the Delivery completed indicator has been marked, but since delivery completed indicator field is not active in Service PO, hence this indicator has not been set manually.
    Can someone please explain this behaviour, as there is not servcie entry sheet against this line item in PO, I cannot revoke the acceptance and reset the Final entry indicator.
    Please share your thoughts.
    Regards
    Vinay

    Hi Rajendra,
    If I had selectedFinal entry then, atleast Purchase Order history would have been updated with th Service entry number. But there is no Purchase Order history for this line item.
    Also I can see the Delivery completed indicator marked in EKPO table for this line item.
    Please advise.
    regards
    Vinay

  • Service Entry - Final Entry set but still can create new entry sheet

    Hi gurus,
    got this problem, after I have set the final entry indicator, I am still able to create new service entry sheet... anyone know why?
    Note: I am currently on ECC5.
    Regards,
    Norman

    Hi,
    First check deletion flag is active in service entry sheet.
    If no then first set deletion flag to service entry sheet.
    Also check Material document is updated with movement type 102 in purchase order history.
    If yes then no problem is exists.
    For your verification please create new service entry sheet for same line item. If system give not any error so no any problem.
    Regards,
    Mahesh Wagh

  • Final entry in service entry

    Is there any way to hide the final entry indicator in Service entry sheet?
    Please advice.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    it is not recommended to hide the final entry sheet icone as the delivery completed indicator in the purchase order (EKPO-ELIKZ) is by default hidden ON PURPOSE for service items so        
    that the control is not performed in the purchase order, but indirectly via the final entry sheet indicator in the respective entry sheet.  
    Please read the note 735404.
    Regards,
    Edit

  • Final Delivery indicator in PO

    Hello,
    I am not getting " final delivery indicator " icon in purchase order.
    we are using ECC6.
    Thanks in advance,
    Vikas R.

    Hi,
    Active "Delivery completed" indicator  for your plant in t.code: OMCD
    For Service(external)
    Check Field Selection Key for SERVICE PO Document type & make "Delivery completed" indicator is "Opt.entry" in GR/IR control segment for Field Selection Key PT9F( OR your Field Selection Key you are using for Frame work order document type) in following path:
    SPRO-> MM--> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level
    Now assign Field Selection Key PT9F for SERVICE PO Document type & save.
    Go for cycle service PO, SES & MIRO and can view Delivery completion indicator
    For more check the SAP Note 735404
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Final invoice indicator for Service based IV

    Hello,
    For invoice verification based on Service entry, the system proposes the final invoice indicator checked.  I'm trying to uncheck this indicator as in our case, vendors usually sends partial invoices.
    We have FM implemented and applied Link: [note 583400 MIRO: EREKZ always proposed with services|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=583400] and it solved part of our issue, as leaving the commitment in the PO, but we need to find a way to unmark the indicator on MIRO so the GR - IV account is not cleared after a partial invoice.
    I would appreciate if someone can tell me how to approach this scenario.
    Thanks in advance,

    Hello Bharat,
    The indicator of the PO is set after this indicator on the invoice. It is actually a result of the IV unless you apply the note 583400.
    What I need is that this indicator to be unchecked for Service items with service entry.
    Regards,

  • Final entry issue in Service Entry and PO

    Dear SAP Guru,
    I am having the situation like this where the servie PO is being created, then service entry and service acceptance are being carried out at ML81N. The PO amount is 100.
    When the service PO is being check at the ME2N, the field "Still to be delivered" is showing the amount of 100.
    If the Service PO being done the service entry with the amount of 50. The "Still to be delivered" field in ME2N will show the amount of 50 and the "Still to be invoiced" field will show the amount of 50.
    If the Serivce PO being done the service entry "Set Final Entry" button being clicked, the "Still to be delivered" field in ME2N will show the amount of 0 and the "Still to be invoiced" field will show the amount of 100.
    My question now is that:-
    If the Serivce PO being done the service entry "Set Final Entry" button being clicked, the  "Still to be delivered" field in ME2N will show the amount of 80 and the "Still to be invoiced" field will show the amount of 20.
    What is to be done to make the "Still to be delivered" field in ME2N to show the amount of zero.
    Is there any indicator being shown in the PO delivery tab if the "Set Final Entry" button being clicked at ML81N.
    Thank you
    Regards
    Leonard

    Hi Tan,
    The delivery completion indicator will be hidden mode in normanl service orders. You have to do a liitle customization to bring it in editable mode.
    Go to SPRO>material management>purchasing>purchase order>Define Screen Layout at Document Level
    Then select field selection PT9F and select GR/IR control. In here for "Delivery completed" indicator check the optional entry and save.
    Now check it in the service order and you will be able to see "Delivery completed"  indicator.
    Regards,
    Mohar

  • Final Delivery indicator in Goods Receipt tab in Process Order

    Hello Friends,
    I have one doubt, thought to discuss with you.Whats the importance of Final delivery indicator in Process order.I know that if any further goods receipt is not accepted against the order than we should tick this indicator,because of which system sets the DLV status at order header level or if goods receipt qty against the order is equal to order qty than system automatically sets this indicator.
    when we do the settlement of order than system looks either for TECO or DLV status of order , if its find  there than system consider such orders for settlement.
    Now my question is suppose i have done the Goods Receipt against the order less than the order qty, than system will set the PDLV Status against that order.Now no further goods receipt is  expected against that order.Now i haven't set the Final delivery indicator in goods receipt tab in process order.But i have technically completed the order,because of which system has set the TECO status against that order.
    Will system allow me to settle such order?and viceversa, if order has DLV status at header level and no TECO status, than system will allow to settle such order?If yes than whats the other use of Final Delivery indicator in process order?Is it important to set that indicator from settlement point of view only?
    As far as i know, system allows us to do,but on this issue i have got different answers from different person.So bit confused.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jitendra Chauhan
    Edited by: jitendra chauhan on May 8, 2009 8:42 AM

    Dear,
    Will system allow me to settle such order?and viceversa, if order has DLV status at header level and no TECO status, than system will allow to settle such order?
    Yes
    If yes than whats the other use of Final Delivery indicator in process order?Is it important to set that indicator from settlement point of view only?
    You need to Final confirm (CNF) the Order to get the DLV Status.
    Or if the Delivery completed indicator is set in the Process Order, then also th System status will be DLV
    If your order quantity10 and you produced 10 quantity it means that order is fully deliver  then Final delivery will automatically be set.
    The "delivery completed" indicator has the following effects:
    o The item is regarded as closed, even if the total quantity was not delivered.
    o A further delivery is not expected, may, however, arrive.
    If status is DLV then it cannot be a WIP stage where the the good are posted to stock and production is completed
    Please refer this thread fro DLV and TECO,
    Re: order settlement
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Purchase order item of maintenance order still without final billing indic

    In maintenance process, while closing the Maintenance order after MIRO and Payment, system is giving warning message as :
    "Purchase order item 4520000023 00010 of order 4000020 still without final billing indic.
    Message no. IW215
    Diagnosis
    An invoice receipt is still expected for order 4000020".
    We tried with MM consultant but setting is not there for Billing indicator.
    Any solution ?
    Regards
    Rewards if resolved...

    Hi,
    Goto respective purchage Order, Select Invoice tab in Item, put tick mark in check box of  Final invoice. Then save the purchange order.
    Preoceed further.
    Regards

  • Purchase order - Final invoice indicator EKPO-EREKZ

    Hi,
    How is possible set Final invoice indicator in purchase order items  - only manualy, or exists solution for automatical setting ?
    Thank you for advice.
    Bernard

    Hi Bernard
    The final invoice indicator has to be selected manually everytime you do MIRO.
    Moreover, just to add on, the final invoice indicator will never stop you from posting further invoice and is used only as a information to the buyer. Make sure you check the PO history tab for finding the correct value of total invoice rather than seeing this check box
    And
    One more thing, incase you a line item in PO with 10 quantity, and you post 10 invoices for 1,1,.. quantity and you check final invoice in any one of them, the indicator is ticked in PO
    For example, once you have final invoice in one invoice, the same is reflected in PO. but after this you post one more invoice without final invoice indicator, still PO will always have the final invoice indicator. You will have to manually remove in the PO if you want.
    Regards
    Vivek Singh

  • Final Delivery indicator not in all rows of Purchase Order

    Hi,
    I am constructing a query in BW where i need to filter out Purcahse Orders for which the Final delivery indicator is set.
    The Purchase cube has the data coming in from following three datasources:
                 2lis_02_hdr (Purcahse Order Header)
                 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item)
                 2lis_02_scl (Purcahse Order Schedule line).
    The Final delivery indicator is populated from Item and schedule line Datasources.The Purchase cube stores the data in such a way that the final delivery indicator is not set for a Purchase order in all the rows.
    Please advice how can i populate the final delivery indicator in the cube for all the rows of a Purchase Order. Also I do not want to reinitialize the data load from R3 or PSA.
    Regards
    Sapna

    Hi ,
    The answer was helpful but my problem was not solved. But in some of the cases the Final delivery indicator is not getting filtered. Also we have Posting date as a Key field in the Info provider.
    Now there are various scenarios. For eg:
    1. If the Final delivery indicator is set from me23n then the posting date is saved in my Purchase cube AND hence i can sort the Posting date and get the final delivery indicator against the Max posting date. 
    2. If the Final delivery indicator is set through MIGO screen, then posting date is blank against final delivery indicator. Hence in Purchase cube the Posting date is blank and sorting will not work.
    Please advice.
    Regards
    Sapna

  • Final Issue Indicator not set in maitnenance order after ECC 6.0 upgrade

    Hi,
    We encounter this problem after upgrading to ECC6.0 from SAP R/3 4.6C
    Final issue indicator (RESBD-KZEAR) is not being set in maintenance order (IW33) for sub-component non-stock items in General Data page
    Would be great if anyone could guide in this regard
    Detailed Scenario:
    1) Maintenance Order is created (IW31) is created in plant A
    2) For non-stock items, reservation created by maintenance order creates a purchase requisition
    3) Account Assigned STO (against maintenance order) is created from purchase requisition
    4) Transfer Posting done from Plant B (351 movement) for complete qty
    5) GR at Plant A done (101 movement) for complete qty.
    6) Final Issue Indicator is not set in General Data page eventhough the complete quantity is delivered.
    Thanks
    Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 8:59 PM
    Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:00 PM
    Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:03 PM

    Hi,
    Please check in the STO if the "Delivery completed" indicator is checked or not?
    If Yes, then search some correction notes of SAP and get it implemented or raise OSS message with SAP to get the Final Issue indicator to be set in maintenance order.
    If No, then ask your MM consultants to investigate that. They can check the config of "Goods Receipt" Or check if the total quantity GR has been done Or some Under delivery/ Over delivery tolerance has been maintained.
    Thanx.
    Nilmoni.

  • Final Issue Indicator on reservation

    I am looking for the answer to how the Final Issue Indicator should function when it is checked doing a partial goods issue to a reservation.
    I've found differing documentations.
    1- Final Issue indicates that a reservation item is completed. Further goods movements in respect of this reservation item are not anticipated, although they are still possible.
    2- If the Final Issue Indicator is set that it will no longer be suggested as a selectable item for issue.
    My problem is that when the Final Issue Indicator is set while doing a partial goods issue, the item still shows up on MIGO as a selectable item when you are issuing remaining items. I did not think the item would still show up as selectable. (seems to be following #1)
    When the Final Indicator is set before issuing anything on the item, then the item doesn't show up as selectable on MIGO. (Seems to be following #2)
    Thanks for any help.

    Hi
    Final issue indicator behaviour in reservation.
    1) Create reservation and in change mode set the FI indicator.
    In this scenario system will not not allow you to use reservation saying that XXXX does not contain selectable item.
    2) Create reservation and do the partial goods issue then set the FI indicator.
    In this scenario system still allows to do the goods issue for the remaining item.As per standard SAP it is still possible to do the GI for the partial issed one even the FI is set. If you want to restrict then you can either set the deletion indicator or remove the movement allowed indicator.
    Hope it helps at some extent.
    Karthik

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I disable "reopen windows when logging back in"

    Everytime I shutdown the mac asks me "reopen windows when logging back in". In fact the default is to do reopen all open programs when I restart. he annoying thing with apple is that when you close a window like Safari and iPhoto the program itself i

  • Why does ipad dim after turning off auto dim

    my ipad continues to dim slightly back and forth despite the fact i turned off auto dim, why?

  • Db_stat -Cl and UNKNOWN

    Hi, I have been using BerkeleyDB-4.7.25 with 16 *.bdb files using BTREE on a Linux server 64bits. While running a set of operations such as : puts/gets/updates/deletes I have executed db_stat -h /......./bdb -N -Cl and the final part of the output wa

  • Message inbox having issues after updating to IOS 6.1

    After updating to IOS 6.1 my SMS inbox has gone crazy. Most of the SMSs have lost their date time stamp. The time of receipt of the SMS for all of them is showing as 9:18 AM, which was the time i took the update 6.1. Is anyone else facing the same is

  • Reinstall Access Connections Problem: X61s Vista32

    I cannot get Access Connections (V5.02 and below) to function when reinstalled. Disk churns, takes forever to load and hangs if start is attempted. Checked required drivers all are ok. Removed again but now wireless is off and refuses to come back on