Final issue indicator for Reservation Item

Hi,
The issue is as follows:
The Componets for the Process order are issued through T. code COIK. Some componets are not appearing in COIK list . when the picking is done for the order, the final issue indicator is set in the process order where the componets are not picked and also the final issue indicator is not set where the componets are picked.
Can anybody tell me what could be the Reason/s for the above.
Regards,
Prasad

Dear,
FI indicator can be set manually via MB22 though the Reserved qty has not been withdrawn.
There is indicator in MB22 to tick for the final issue, this indicator is set automatically for a goods movement when the total reserved quantity has been withdrawn or delivered.
Final option is to clean only the reservation for a given material, just go to the ordern in change mode, and then to the material details, and set the flag "on" for the field "Final Issue".
Reservations are created when order gets released.
1. can clear these reservations at the time of the order confirmations by clicking on checkbox for clear open reservations.
2. You can also clear this reservations by using transaction code MB22 & deleting the reservations.
3. You can delete all reservations by deleting material documents or by cancelling process order confirmations.
4. Or by checking final issue in process order transaction COR2.
Hope this will resolve your querry.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

Final issue indicator for component

Hi
I have requirement to set final issue indicator to all components when process order has DLV status.
We have confirmation configuration which will set final issue indicator when operation is finally confirmed.
Iam using special control key to identify operation for which components are attached
If i use COHVPI mass confirmation then it confirms all operations though i select special control key in layout filter. We dont want to confirm all operations
Is there any STANDARD way to do mass confirmation of selected operation / phases. ?
Or
Is there is any STANDARD way to set final issue indicator for all process order components, when order is delivered?

Hi Caetano
My requirement is to do this in background with confirmation of only one operation for which i have special identifier like control key.
I dont want to confirm other operations.

Final Issue Indicator on reservation

I am looking for the answer to how the Final Issue Indicator should function when it is checked doing a partial goods issue to a reservation.
I've found differing documentations.
1- Final Issue indicates that a reservation item is completed. Further goods movements in respect of this reservation item are not anticipated, although they are still possible.
2- If the Final Issue Indicator is set that it will no longer be suggested as a selectable item for issue.
My problem is that when the Final Issue Indicator is set while doing a partial goods issue, the item still shows up on MIGO as a selectable item when you are issuing remaining items. I did not think the item would still show up as selectable. (seems to be following #1)
When the Final Indicator is set before issuing anything on the item, then the item doesn't show up as selectable on MIGO. (Seems to be following #2)
Thanks for any help.

Hi
Final issue indicator behaviour in reservation.
1) Create reservation and in change mode set the FI indicator.
In this scenario system will not not allow you to use reservation saying that XXXX does not contain selectable item.
2) Create reservation and do the partial goods issue then set the FI indicator.
In this scenario system still allows to do the goods issue for the remaining item.As per standard SAP it is still possible to do the GI for the partial issed one even the FI is set. If you want to restrict then you can either set the deletion indicator or remove the movement allowed indicator.
Hope it helps at some extent.
Karthik

How to deactivate automatic setting of final issue indicator in reservation

Our client has a requirement to deactivate the automatic setting of the final issue indicator after the reserved quantity on a reservation has been fulfilled.
The requirement comes from an overnight shift that does not have access to the SAP system, so the final issue indicator that is automatically set after the reserved quantity is fulfilled cannot be reset manually when the material is needed during the overnight shift.
I do not believe backflushing is an option because the material is issued to a cost center (orders are managed outside SAP) and thus there is no confirmation.
Is there a standard method for deactivating the automatic setting of the final issue indicator when the reserved quantity is reacched?
Thanks.

Bob_Smith1103 wrote:
The requirement comes from an overnight shift that does not have access to the SAP system, so the final issue indicator that is automatically set after the reserved quantity is fulfilled cannot be reset manually when the material is needed during the overnight shift.
Please see my earlier comment that the overnight shift does not have access to SAP and therefore cannot manually reset the final issue indicator until the next day when someone with SAP access is present.
Obviously the goods issue could wait until the next day, but the client is not satisfied with waiting until the next day to post-process the goods issue.

Mass change final issue indicator in production order

Hi
Is there any report can show final issue indicator for all production order? How can I mass change the indicator?

Hi,
In reports such as COOIS and COHV you can select in the initial screen "List: Components" and check your "Change layouts" to view the report with the "Final Issue" indicator.
But you cannot do a mass change in this option. One way is : You can just select the particular order -> goto Component Overview of the order to be changed and do the necessary changes and save to get the required result.
-Thaila Shree

Clear open reservation for Final issue indicator.

Final issue indicator is not getting checked unless we issue the entire requirement quantity.
How can we get it checked for all components without going into the process order?
Does the clear open reservation checkmark be used for this purpose and if with Final confirmation?
or is there something else?
Thnx!

Hi Abhi,
While confirming the operations, flag 'Clear open reservations' check box & this will set the "delivery completed" indicator for all open reservations.
Hope it answers your query.
Regards,
Vivek

Final Issue Indicator not set in maitnenance order after ECC 6.0 upgrade

Hi,
We encounter this problem after upgrading to ECC6.0 from SAP R/3 4.6C
Final issue indicator (RESBD-KZEAR) is not being set in maintenance order (IW33) for sub-component non-stock items in General Data page
Would be great if anyone could guide in this regard
Detailed Scenario:
1) Maintenance Order is created (IW31) is created in plant A
2) For non-stock items, reservation created by maintenance order creates a purchase requisition
3) Account Assigned STO (against maintenance order) is created from purchase requisition
4) Transfer Posting done from Plant B (351 movement) for complete qty
5) GR at Plant A done (101 movement) for complete qty.
6) Final Issue Indicator is not set in General Data page eventhough the complete quantity is delivered.
Thanks
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 8:59 PM
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:00 PM
Edited by: muthukumarv on Apr 2, 2010 9:03 PM

Hi,
Please check in the STO if the "Delivery completed" indicator is checked or not?
If Yes, then search some correction notes of SAP and get it implemented or raise OSS message with SAP to get the Final Issue indicator to be set in maintenance order.
If No, then ask your MM consultants to investigate that. They can check the config of "Goods Receipt" Or check if the total quantity GR has been done Or some Under delivery/ Over delivery tolerance has been maintained.
Thanx.
Nilmoni.

Final issue indicator on the general data button on the work order

Hi Gurus,
can anybody please let me know why the final issue check box is checked automatically even before the goods are issued via migo against the work orders. This check box is on the general data tab of the material entered on the components tab of the work order. Please help. As a result of this, the store room clerk cannot issue the material againsth the work order, because this check mark is checked. I want to understand what is causing the check mark to be checked automaticallu even before tthe materials are issued out
Thanks
ANusa

Hello!
This might have occured due to completion confirmation of order before goods issue. Generally this happens if final issue indicator is set as default in completion confirmation tab. Please check and reply if problem is something else.
Regards,
Vaibhav Mishra
Edited by: Mishra_Vaibhav on Jan 27, 2011 5:23 AM

Final invoice indicator for Service based IV

Hello,
For invoice verification based on Service entry, the system proposes the final invoice indicator checked. I'm trying to uncheck this indicator as in our case, vendors usually sends partial invoices.
We have FM implemented and applied Link: [note 583400 MIRO: EREKZ always proposed with services|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=583400] and it solved part of our issue, as leaving the commitment in the PO, but we need to find a way to unmark the indicator on MIRO so the GR - IV account is not cleared after a partial invoice.
I would appreciate if someone can tell me how to approach this scenario.
Thanks in advance,

Hello Bharat,
The indicator of the PO is set after this indicator on the invoice. It is actually a result of the IV unless you apply the note 583400.
What I need is that this indicator to be unchecked for Service items with service entry.
Regards,

'Final issue' indicator automatically

Hello,
A flow has been developed to transfer material (assigned to network activity) from 1 plant to another plant through a stock transfer order with a specific movement type . Find that 'Final issue' on material tab is not getting flagged automatically (and reservation not getting closed) automatically on PGI of delivery from STO.
Like to know the probable reason or the setting which does it automatically on PGI on complete quantity.
With regards,
Mrinal

Hi Ahmed,
We have created a new flow in PS , wherein materials are transferred from one plant to another plant through Stock transport . A new movement type (copy of MT 641) has been created for STO so that the cost is booked on project on PGI from STO Delivery.Materials are assigned to different activities (assigned to different plant) under the same network.
Observe that the reservations on WBS on source plant is not getting reduced on PGI of delivery from STO.
With regards,
Mrinal

Automatic SOS in shopping cart for reservation items

Dear all,
I am creating a shopping cart using a catalog item that creates a reservation in the backend (classic). However, when i change sthing, the system reads an info record that exist in the back-end and assigns the vendor as the source of supply for this items.
Why the system behaves like that?
BR

Hi,
Please check in config setting "Define Backend Objects ".
Please debug the transfer process.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/Follow-ondocumentdetermination(PR,PO,RS)
Thanks,
Anshu

Date of Final Release Indicator for PO Release

Is there a table in SAP that provides the date the PO was approved for Final Release? I know that through ME23N you can get this information in the Environment and Header Changes area, but we would like to add this information to a report and are having trouble locating where SAP is storing the data.

Hi,
Pass into CDPOS table:
OBJECTCLAS = u201CEINKBELEGu201D , OBJECTID = PO Number (EBELN), T. Code = u201CME28 or equal to ME29Nu201D and Get all change document no. (CHANGENR)
TABNAME = u201CEKKOu201D, u201CField Name= FRGKE, Old Value = u201C0u201D and New value = u201C1u201D in to CDPOS and get latest change document number (CHANGENR).
Then pass CHANGENR into Change document No (CDHDR- CHANGENR), OBJECTCLAS = u201CEINKBELEGu201D,
U get who has released and date also.
Regards,
chinna

CO19 - Backflush - Final Issue

Hello,
We are running into an issue with the final issue indicator for components when we are using CO19 to confirm orders. The Process is that we first complete a B10 (Processing Started), then a B40 (Processing Finish), then a V40 to complete the variable activity finish. The reason we are doing the V40 is because we are using BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TE, which cannot set the field FIN_CONF with the B40 (note 1230750), so the V40 (finally confirmed) will complete the final confirmation.
Here is the issue:
After the B40 record is processed, inventory tries to relieve for all back flushed materials. If there is NO inventory available to back flush, an error will appear in COGI, and the order reservation will stay in MD04. This is desired. However, once the V40 activity is completed (finally confirmed), the problem is that the Finial Issue Flag in the Production order is also getting checked. With the final issue flag being checked, it is removing the order reservation in MD04 for the back flushed material that is still in COGI. Because the error is still in COGI, we DO NOT want the Finial Issue flag checked, which will allow the order reservation to remain in MD04.
Is there something we are missing in configuration that will prevent the order reservation from being removed from MD04 if the material is not yet issued to the production order? In OPK4 we do not have the "Post Open Reservations" box checked.
I appreciate any help.
Thank you.

Hello Ann400,
I am afraid that there is no simple solution. If you set - for whatever reason - the FIN_CONF indicator, this leads automatically to final delivery indicator as well as final issue indicators for the components. This is a system design and it is idependent from the confirmed quantity even if it is zero -> therefore COGI records are not considered.
As a workaround you may think about not to call the BAPI for the V40 (because you're calling it just for the final indicators) as long as COGI records from the B40 exist. This would solve your issue. But this is something you need to do in your source code environment.
Hope this helps.
Regards, Andreas

Goods Issue indicator

Hi,
Goods Issue indicator error in (Tcode MIGO > Movement type - 123)
One excisable item has been returned to vendor (122 movement) wrongly, now when I am trying to revrese return to vendor delivery (123 movement type) for the same getting following error -
Please enter Goods Issue indicator
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ 4F (Message class for India localization)
Kindly suggest me the tcode OR path to maintain Goods issue indicator for this item.
Same process I have doen for another excisable item no such error comes at that time.
Thanks & Regards
Sumedha
Edited by: Sumedha Arya Hanspal on Feb 24, 2010 1:42 PM

This transaction is not having 122 or 123 movement types..
This issue is not related to SPRO, as the same reversal done for another item smoothly, this is related to particular item for which I need to set Goods Issue indicator.
regards
sumedha

Error in goods issue for reservation

i had created a reservation for a material with batch management activated.
When i try to issue the same material for cost centre it is throwing the error 'Document doesnot contain any selectable items'.
What could be the problem.

Hi
Check the movement type for reserved item and what movement your issuing the goods.
check the stock in mmbe with stoloc-batch wise avalability.
Laxman

Final issue indicator for Reservation Item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for