Finder is very slow, particularly when using network drive

I have a mid-2011 Macbook Air, OSX 10.9.4, and Finder is extremely slow, particularly when I am navigating my Time Capsule.  First, a little history.
I have tried the fixes listed in these three threads:
(1) https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3358265?searchText=finder%20slow
(2) https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1324280?searchText=Finder%20is%20slow
(3) https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5495797?start=30&tstart=0
Second, my Time Capsule is new.  I bought it to replace a WD MyBook that used to work really well, and then something changed.  Unfortunately, I assumed that it was some problem on WD's side, so after a year or two of waiting to see if either WD or Apple issued an update to fix it, I assumed it was some kind of file system incompatibility (or other interoperability problem) that wasn't likely to go away, and just sprung for the Time Capsule.  However, after getting all the files on the Time Capsule, the problem remains.  So here's a rundown of what I experience:
When I navigate the directories on my Time Capsule, if I haven't been in a particular folder, it takes a very long time to load the contents.  On average, it will be 30 seconds, but it is not uncommon for it to be over a minute.  This can happen even if a folder is empty or has just a few files in it.  In addition, adding a subfolder and trying to rename it takes a very long time.  After renaming a new folder, it can then take another full minute or more for the folder to actually show the newly assigned name and bounce into line in alphabetical order.
Here are some other observations.  First, my connection is very fast, as I'm directly connected to the Time Capsule (albeit via wireless).  Second, there is clearly something extra going on in Finder that is contributing to this issue, because I navigated to different directories using Terminal and did an "ls" command, and as you would expect, the list fired out virtually instantaneously.  Yet, right after that, if I clicked on that same folder with Finder, it would take a minute or more to display the same file names.
Could it be that the Finder is doing other things at the same time as it is giving me a list of what is in the directory?  For example, could the Finder be loading ALL metadata for each of the files into some database or index being built on the fly every time I pop into a new folder, even if I'm not using a view mode where I am asking to see those other bits of metadata?  If so, that might make sense as I generally am using the network drive to navigate directories of my photographs, and they have a lot more categories of metadata associated with them than do Word docs and PDFs (e.g., date of picture, time of picture, aperture, shutter speed, exposure, etc.).  Or, perhaps is Finder trying to load previews of ALL of the files whenever a directory request is made, so that bouncing through the previews takes less time?  I sort of doubt that, because even after a directory listing finally comes up, it seems to churn a bit on each photo before the preview comes up, which I take as an indication that it's creating each preview only after a request is made for that particular file.  Either way, I will say that in old WinXP and even in the newer Windows 7, if you want to view files in a Detailed setting where you can see other metadata (called "Attributes"), it definitely prioritizes giving you a directory listing, and then continues filling in the various selected Attributes one-by-one after that.  Thus, if you want to sort by the date a photograph was taken (as opposed to its modified or created date, which seem to be default attributes that load as quickly (or nearly as quickly) as the filename), or by the photo's dimensions, it might take a few minutes to load in those attributes for a folder of a couple thousand pictures.  But, critically, if you are not planning on using those attributes, but rather, merely want to see how many files you have in that folder, or select them all and load them into a photo viewer, you won't have to wait for the file system to load the file attributes before you get a listing of the folder's contents.  It seems to me like the Finder, however, might actually be forcing you to wait until it has loaded all of those attributes.
Does the foregoing sound like a plausible explanation of the problem to those out there with knowledge of how Finder actually works?  And if so, does that bring to mind any potential settings that could be turned off or any other work-arounds (since those I've tried have not fixed the issue)?
If anyone has other ideas, I am all ears.  I am pretty annoyed that I sunk time into switching over to a Time Capsule on the assumption that Apple couldn't have had a bug this bad, only to find out that I was wrong.  The biggest irony is that my old WinXP computer used to rip through the folder structures with ease on the MyBook, but my fully updated Air is practically crippled by the same task.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a test, not a solution. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
Step 1
The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is localized to your user account.
Enable guest logins* and log in as Guest. Don't use the Safari-only “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac.”
While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your documents or settings. Applications will behave as if you were running them for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this behavior; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin.
Test while logged in as Guest. Same problem?
After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it.
*Note: If you’ve activated “Find My Mac” or FileVault, then you can’t enable the Guest account. The “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac” is not the same. Create a new account in which to test, and delete it, including its home folder, after testing.
Step 2
The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party system modifications that load automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
Please take this step regardless of the results of Step 1.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you turn on the computer, and again when you log in.
Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to start up and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
After testing, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of Steps 1 and 2.

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2013 CU5 , Exchange Power Shell very very very slow reasponse when using get command.

    Exchange 2013 CU5 , Exchange Power Shell very very very slow reasponse when using get command.
    First my organize has Exchange on 2 site like
    site A (internet facing) : 2CAS 2 MB all are Services pack1
    site B (DR Site , no user active on this site) : 2CAS 2MB all are Services pack 1
    so today I upgrade Exchange 2013 from SP1 to CU5 start on "site B" and I found this issue and the details is....
    When I open EMS on any CU5 for query something (like get-mailboxdatabasecopystatus) the response return very slow and some query will not return at all (like get-owavirtualdirectory).
    But If I using EMS on SP1. Everything is ok then I try to use EMS on SP1 connect to CU5 and try to query something. the result is
    some query command cannot return for any result that are server on siteB (just some query command)
    Problem
    EMS on CU5 return very slow result.
    EMS on SP1 still ok.
    Does anyone face this problem before for CU5??? Please help me figure this out. Thank you
    reply from Social.technet

    Hi,
    Have you used the above cmdlets to check your Exchange server health?
    "all other command that I ran on EMS didn't logged on event viewer.", my environment is the same with you. I use Exchange 2013, only errors will be displayed in MSExchange Management. Actually, it is not related to slow EMS response.
    Hope it helps.
    Best regards,
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • RoboHelp 8 runs slow when using network drive...

    I have several users at my business that have upgraded from RoboHelp X5 to RoboHelp 8. They are reporting that when they work on projects which are housed on a network drive, RohoHelp performs very slowly (which never seemed to happen before with X5). I have read on several forums that RoboHelp should only be used with projects that are on the local drive, but I cannot find any official recommendation from Adobe about this, nor have I found any explanation as to why the network drive doesn't work well. Has Adobe every officially commented on this, and does anyone know why network drive performance is so lousy? Is there anything that can be done to allow my users to keep on utilizing their network drive without the poor performance? Thanks in advance for any help you folks can provide, I am stumped.

    Hi, and welcome, Robo_Newbie
    You're about to become Robo_Oldie real quick
    Your RoboHelp projects MUST live on a local drive. You can archive them on a network, but NEVER actually open and edit while they are on the network.
    The two reasons most people incorrectly assume they should be on the network is because you want to share with other authors and you want to back them up in case your hard drive crashes. Those are valid reasons, but it doesn't work because the .CPD (an Access database cache file) typically becomes corrupted - not to mention the perfomance issues related to LAN latency.
    So what most of us do is to either use the free RoboSource Control that comes with RoboHelp or to work out a manual routine of copying your current work to a LAN for safekeeping and establishing a routine with the other authors on who will work on what, when.
    Sorry to break the bad news. That's the reality.
    John Daigle
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp and Captivate Instructor
    www.showmethedemo.com

  • DSL Connection Very slow ONLY when using wireless router

    My DSL connection was running super slow (approx 136 Kbs) - I disconnected the Linksys wireless router and plugged by DSL modem directly into the computer.  Then my internet speed increased to 1.4 Mbs (a 10 fold increase).
    Any suggestions on how / why my speed drops so extensively when using the Linksys wireless routher (wrt45g).
    Thanks

    Are you using the same test each time to measure the speed?
    The reason I ask is that Windows usually reports its download speed in KB/sec (Kilobytes per second).  But most web (internet) speed tests report their speed in Mbps (Megabits per second.)
    A 1.4 Mbps line will typically pass data at about 140KB/sec.
    To help determine what kind of problem you are having, do the same speed test in 3 different ways:
    1)  Connect one computer, by wire, directly to your modem
    2)  Connect one computer, by wire, directly to your router  (all other computers and network devices should be off).
    3)  Connect one computer, wirelessly, to your router  (all other computers and network devices should be off).
    Report back your results, and also, please state what line speed you are paying for.  Once we have this, we will hopefully be able to help you. 

  • Very slow graphics when using AMD Radeon HD 6490M with Yosemite

    I'm using a 15" MacBook Pro early 2011. When I switch to the GPU using gfxCardStatus (or because an app requires it), all graphics become very slow: window dragging, window miniaturize animation, moving the mouse in the menubar etc. 3D view in Maps.app is very slow. All is fine when using the integrated Intel HD 3000. I did not have this problem with Yosemite Developer Previews (I did not install the GMs), nor with Mavericks.
    I tried using AMD kext from the DP, but things are worst (I suppose the kext are not loaded at all because the signature does not match).

    Hi. I tried to do that with the same download package on my Pavilion DV6 CTO Quad edition and it fails to install the driver because of a conflict with the C++ Redistributable 2010 package build into the installer. Does anyone know if HP is going to update the switchable graphic drivers for Windows 8? They better!

  • Very slow wirelesss when using iPhone 4S' personal hotspot for a MacBook Pro (MBP)...

    Hello.
    Last night, I was helping a client with his old iPhone 4S' personal hotspot as shown in http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT4517 web page. It uses Verizon Wireless 3G for his 4 GB data cellular connection. We got the wireless (WPA2) connection to work fine, but it was very slow like crappy dial-up modem speeds. Is this normal? iPhone's iOS v8.1.2's top screen says 1X (is this a speed number?) and left of MBP. Updated Mac OS X 10.8.5's top screen shows an infinite(?) symbol instead of that wifi arc symbol.
    Thank you in advance.

    yes, 1x is a speed indicator, and it is very slow. Even with 3g speeds, hotspot will be pretty slow, but still ok for simple surfing and emails and such, streaming not so much. For hotspot, you really kinda want to have at least 4g, preferably LTE.
    About that 1x speed, you may want to see if you get that everywhere or just in that location. Ideally, in a good coverage area, you should not be getting such slow speeds. Might have something to do with the building you are in though. If you get the same outdoors, and your coverage area is good, you may want to call in and have someone troubleshoot your signal.

  • Finder Search brings no Result, when search network drives.

    Hello,
    I am a big time user of search (or spotlight) on my Macintosh and I have been using for years and through all the updates. I loved the recent updates to spotlight and I was able to search not only my HD but also the network drives where all of our files are located on an Mac Server.
    I am the IT person of this small graphic design firm and everyone in our office work on files that are located on a Mac Server. We only keep the applications on our own client computers.
    Spotlight or (search) was function perfectly up to a few weeks ago but recently when I need to search something on our Signage A, Signage B, Signage C or Print A, Print B or Print C, drives where we keep our files. The search does not bring no result. This is a problem not only with my computer but there are a few computers in the office with the same problem.
    My question is what can I do to resolve this problem and be able to search again on my network drives where I keep all the files we are working on. If this function is no longer available with spotlight or search box of the finder window. Is there another software we can use to search for files and folders on our server.
    Since there are a few people working on the same files sometimes when the files are moved it makes it difficult for the next person to find them, in that kind of situation search was working wonderfully and I need for that to work again.
    Thanks,
    Omar Noorzay

    Search these forums for *search shares, search externals, search HDs*, and other variants. There have been numerous posts WRT the 10.5.6 update and problems such as you're reporting.

  • Very slow queries when using oracle spatial

    Hi,
    I am new to oracle, please help with me the problem that I am facing.
    I am storing spatial regions inside the data base. The data is in very simple in form. That is each region is a small rectangle. The boundaries of rectangle touch each other but they do not overlap. Basically I am filling the 2D space with rectangles.
    I use the SDO_FILTER query to find regions inside the data base that intersect with a line. The data base contains a single table. With one column of type SDO_GEOMETRY. And the table has around 25000 tuples.
    The problem is that when the result of the query is large (70% of the tuples) that means there are many regions in the cache that intersect the line, the amount of time it takes is a lot more(6 times) than if I do the same without using the R Tree.
    I can do it without using the R Tree because all my objects are rectangles. I store the the left bottom and the top right corner of the rectangle in the data base. And then use a simple range query.
    Is this behaviour expected? should I use an R Tree index structure, or something else. I know that when the result is very large the R Tree search will have to search many sub trees to retrieve the data points. But should the performance be worse than a sequential scan?
    Or will indexes only work for cases where the selectivity of the query is high?
    Please reply I need help,
    Thank you,
    Nishant

    Hi,
    I am using the version of spatial that we get with Oracle9i Release 2 (9.2.0.1) or it could be
    Oracle 9i release 2 (9.2.0.2).
    I don't know how to check that.
    Here I provide the create script, create index statement and a few sample data items that I insert into the data base.
    Create Script:
    create table out5d(
    ID                          NUMBER(9),
    PID NUMBER(9),
    X                          NUMBER,
    Y NUMBER,
    L NUMBER,
    PL NUMBER,
    shape                          MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY,
    HEIGHT                         NUMBER,
    N                          NUMBER(9),
    d0 NUMBER,
    d1 NUMBER,
    d2 NUMBER,
    d3 NUMBER,
    d4                         NUMBER,
    D0_MAX NUMBER,
    D1_MAX NUMBER,
    D2_MAX NUMBER,
    D3_MAX NUMBER,
    D4_MAX NUMBER,
    D0_MIN NUMBER,
    D1_MIN NUMBER,
    D2_MIN NUMBER,
    D3_MIN NUMBER,
    D4_MIN NUMBER);
    alter table out5d
    add constraint keyConstraint
    primary key (ID);
    Create Index:
    INSERT INTO USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA VALUES ('out5d' , 'shape' , MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY( MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', 0, 1, 0.0000001), MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', 0, 1, 0.0000001) ), NULL);
    CREATE INDEX out5d_rtree ON out5d(shape) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
    I changed the fan out to 50. Because I read in the spatial user guide that in case you are expecting a big output result you should increase the fan out to 50 or 60.
    Also here is a sample data items that I inserted into the tables.
    insert into out5d Values (25129,17556,0.804932,0.804993,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.298039,0.5,0.243137,0.222222,0.266667,0.298039,0.5,0.243137,0.222222,0.266667,0.298039,0.5,0.243137,0.222222,0.266667);
    insert into out5d Values (25130,17556,0.804993,0.805054,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.290196,0.494681,0.235294,0.222222,0.266667,0.290196,0.494681,0.235294,0.222222,0.266667,0.290196,0.494681,0.235294,0.222222,0.266667);
    insert into out5d Values (25131,19920,0.371094,0.371155,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.337255,0.734043,0.262745,0.239316,0.357576,0.337255,0.734043,0.262745,0.239316,0.357576,0.337255,0.734043,0.262745,0.239316,0.357576);
    insert into out5d Values (25132,19920,0.371155,0.371216,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.345098,0.723404,0.270588,0.239316,0.357576,0.345098,0.723404,0.270588,0.239316,0.357576,0.345098,0.723404,0.270588,0.239316,0.357576);
    insert into out5d Values (25133,19920,0.371216,0.371277,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.352941,0.734043,0.262745,0.247863,0.363636,0.352941,0.734043,0.262745,0.247863,0.363636,0.352941,0.734043,0.262745,0.247863,0.363636);
    insert into out5d Values (25134,19920,0.371277,0.371338,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.345098,0.728723,0.262745,0.247863,0.363636,0.345098,0.728723,0.262745,0.247863,0.363636,0.345098,0.728723,0.262745,0.247863,0.363636);
    insert into out5d Values (25135,17615,0.298706,0.298767,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.231373,1,0.262745,0.589744,0.606061,0.231373,1,0.262745,0.589744,0.606061,0.231373,1,0.262745,0.589744,0.606061);
    insert into out5d Values (25136,17615,0.298767,0.298828,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.223529,1,0.270588,0.589744,0.606061,0.223529,1,0.270588,0.589744,0.606061,0.223529,1,0.270588,0.589744,0.606061);
    insert into out5d Values (25137,17615,0.298828,0.298889,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.231373,1,0.262745,0.598291,0.618182,0.231373,1,0.262745,0.598291,0.618182,0.231373,1,0.262745,0.598291,0.618182);
    insert into out5d Values (25138,17615,0.298889,0.29895,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.231373,1,0.270588,0.589744,0.612121,0.231373,1,0.270588,0.589744,0.612121,0.231373,1,0.270588,0.589744,0.612121);
    insert into out5d Values (25139,19918,0.518127,0.518188,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.584314,1,0.152941,0.282051,0.412121,0.584314,1,0.152941,0.282051,0.412121,0.584314,1,0.152941,0.282051,0.412121);
    insert into out5d Values (25140,19918,0.518188,0.51825,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.572549,1,0.160784,0.282051,0.418182,0.572549,1,0.160784,0.282051,0.418182,0.572549,1,0.160784,0.282051,0.418182);
    insert into out5d Values (25141,19918,0.51825,0.518311,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.572549,0.994681,0.152941,0.282051,0.412121,0.572549,0.994681,0.152941,0.282051,0.412121,0.572549,0.994681,0.152941,0.282051,0.412121);
    insert into out5d Values (25142,19918,0.518311,0.518372,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.576471,1,0.160784,0.282051,0.412121,0.576471,1,0.160784,0.282051,0.412121,0.576471,1,0.160784,0.282051,0.412121);
    insert into out5d Values (25143,23411,0.193237,0.193298,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.211765,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.218182,0.211765,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.218182,0.211765,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.218182);
    insert into out5d Values (25144,23411,0.193298,0.193359,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.219608,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.212121,0.219608,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.212121,0.219608,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.212121);
    insert into out5d Values (25145,23411,0.193359,0.19342,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.219608,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.206061,0.219608,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.206061,0.219608,1,0.145098,0.196581,0.206061);
    insert into out5d Values (25146,23411,0.19342,0.193481,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.219608,0.994681,0.152941,0.188034,0.218182,0.219608,0.994681,0.152941,0.188034,0.218182,0.219608,0.994681,0.152941,0.188034,0.218182);
    insert into out5d Values (25147,23411,0.193481,0.193542,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.219608,1,0.152941,0.188034,0.212121,0.219608,1,0.152941,0.188034,0.212121,0.219608,1,0.152941,0.188034,0.212121);
    insert into out5d Values (25148,10867,0.326904,0.326965,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.156863,1,0.290196,0.589744,0.612121,0.156863,1,0.290196,0.589744,0.612121,0.156863,1,0.290196,0.589744,0.612121);
    insert into out5d Values (25149,10867,0.326965,0.327026,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.152941,1,0.298039,0.581197,0.606061,0.152941,1,0.298039,0.581197,0.606061,0.152941,1,0.298039,0.581197,0.606061);
    insert into out5d Values (25150,10867,0.327026,0.327087,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.152941,1,0.290196,0.598291,0.618182,0.152941,1,0.290196,0.598291,0.618182,0.152941,1,0.290196,0.598291,0.618182);
    insert into out5d Values (25151,10867,0.327087,0.327148,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.156863,1,0.305882,0.589744,0.612121,0.156863,1,0.305882,0.589744,0.612121,0.156863,1,0.305882,0.589744,0.612121);
    insert into out5d Values (25152,10867,0.327148,0.327209,0,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,0.156863,1,0.298039,0.589744,0.612121,0.156863,1,0.298039,0.589744,0.612121,0.156863,1,0.298039,0.589744,0.612121);

  • 've never used a Mac before, recently i purchased a MBP13" which came loaded with LION OS by default. I upgraded the OS to OS10.7.2 when prompted. Now after the upgrade, my MBP feels very slow - specially when typing emails !! What is the solution ??

    I've never used a Mac before, recently i purchased a MBP13" which came loaded with LION OS by default. I upgraded the OS to OS10.7.2 when prompted. Now after the upgrade, my MBP feels very slow - specially when typing emails !! What is the solution ??

    After an update or installation, your MBP may take some time to index its files. Give it some time - but if you don't see any improvement, post here - you'll get an answer!

  • Hi!I was restoring my MacBook pro to its factory setting by erasing the disk and reinstalling OS X lion via internet.but it is failing telling me that my network is very slow while I used the best network in the area.How sld I get an OS X lion to my CP?

    Hi!I was restoring my MacBook pro to its factory setting by erasing the disk and reinstalling OS X lion via internet.but it is failing telling me that my network is very slow while I used the best network in my area.How should I get an OS X lion to my CP? Is it possible to get it from another MacBook pro?Or is it possible to recover the erased OS X Lion without or with external disc?
    Thank you

    Hi OGELTHORPE!
    Thank you for your advice but I don't know where i can get it and where to get it. Also I don't know also how to use it.
    Could you please keep on helping me?
    Regards!

  • Finder being very slow on user account

    Hello,
    I have a retina MacBook Pro with 16GB of ram. I am having an issue with finder being very slow on one of my user accounts, sometimes it is taking up to a 2mins to show the files in the folder. Also if often hangs and I get the beachball icon when clicking into folders and just using finder in general. This is on both local drives and network drives. I have 2 user accounts one for personal and one for work. My personal account has no problems and it is fast as I would expect from an SSD. My work account has all the same applications and I can't see anything obvious in activity monitor that would be causing it to be slow. I've thought about making a new user account but I would like to have all my settings etc the same as I have it set up just right now.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Andy

    Problems such as yours are sometimes caused by files that should belong to you but are locked or have wrong permissions. This procedure will check for such files. It makes no changes and therefore will not, in itself, solve your problem.
    First, empty the Trash.
    Triple-click the line below to select it, then copy the selected text to the Clipboard (command-C):
    find ~ $TMPDIR.. \( -flags +sappnd,schg,uappnd,uchg -o ! -user $UID -o ! -perm -600 -o -acl \) 2> /dev/null | wc -l
    Launch the Terminal application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Terminal in the icon grid.
    Paste into the Terminal window (command-V). The command may take a noticeable amount of time to run. Wait for a new line ending in a dollar sign (“$”) to appear.
    The output of this command, on a line directly below what you entered, will be a number such as "41." Please post it in a reply.

  • Very slow responce when working with Office file on DFS-Share

    Very slow responce when working with Office file on DFS-Share
    We have implemented the following configuration
    Domain level Windows 2000. Two member servers with Windows Server 2008 R2, sharing the same DFS namespace with, at the moment, one folder target called Home.
    Users complaining that the access to different MS Office files is very slow. Even creating a new MS Word document using right click context menu takes up to 4 minutes to open. Saving, for example, one singe Excel sheet takes also few minutes.
    Tested with both, MS Office 2007 and MS Office 2010. Makes no difference. When using Office 2010 you can see the message like contacting:
    \\DomainName\Root\Home\UserName. Other files like TXT, JPG or PDF are not affected.
     What makes the thing really weird is the fact, that the behavior described above can absolutely change after client machine being rebooted, suddenly everything becomes very fast and this condition can revert back again just after the next
    reboot.
    Considerations until now:
    1. This has nothing to do with the file size. Even tiny files are affected.
    2. AD Sites are configured correctly and the client workstations see themselves in the correct sites.
    3. This is not an Office issue. If I map my folder target not as DFS, but directly as shared network drive
    \\ServerName\Root\Home\UserName , everything functions as expected
    What makes me suspicious: when using f.e. TCPView to monitor connections, I can see, that each time I make any operation on an office file, there will be a connection established to one of the domain controllers, sometimes to remote ones,
    located in other countries. But on the other side, even if the connection is established to the nearest DC, operations are still very very slow!
    Just forget to say. All clients are Windows 7
    Thanks to all who respond.

    Dear all,
    sorry for the delayed reply. The problem has been solved now and since September 19<sup>th</sup>. everything is functioning as expected.
    What was done:
    Deleted replication targets excepting the initial ones
    Carefully recreated folder targets
    Deleted and recreated  replication groups
    Disabled SNP features on both namespace servers
    Created EnableTCPA registry entry
    Checked that the following Updates are installed
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2688074
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2647452
    Concering Office File validation KB2553065 - This Update was already declined on our WSUS server
    Kind Regards
    Eduard

  • Copy in Finder is very slow

    Hi,
    I use OS X 10.8.2 here and file copy from a disc image to finder is very slow.
    i can find this in console:
    21.09.12 16:31:45,283 DiskImages UI Agent[1207]: *** -[NSMachPort handlePortMessage:]: dropping incoming DO message because the connection is invalid
    21.09.12 16:31:47,510 Locum[1219]: Connection with distnoted server was invalidated
    What's the problem?
    When I use an other user on my Mac copy in Finder works fine.

    Hi,
    I use OS X 10.8.2 here and file copy from a disc image to finder is very slow.
    i can find this in console:
    21.09.12 16:31:45,283 DiskImages UI Agent[1207]: *** -[NSMachPort handlePortMessage:]: dropping incoming DO message because the connection is invalid
    21.09.12 16:31:47,510 Locum[1219]: Connection with distnoted server was invalidated
    What's the problem?
    When I use an other user on my Mac copy in Finder works fine.

  • My firefox is running very slow, espically when I am typing, scrolling and in many simple activities. On the other hand my internet explorer is going normally like simple browser.

    My firefox is running very slow, espically when I am typing, scrolling and in many simple activities. On the other hand my internet explorer is going normally like simple browser.

    Hi,
    Please try disabling all the features under '''Browsing''' in '''Tools '''('''Alt''' + '''T''') > '''Options '''> '''Advanced '''> '''General'''. You can later toggle the values to find an optimum solution. Please also [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Options%20window%20-%20Advanced%20panel?as=u see this.]
    Useful links:
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Options%20window All about Tools > Options]
    [http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config Going beyond Tools > Options - about:config]
    [http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries about:config Entries]
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Page%20Info%20window Page Info] Tools (Alt + T) > Page Info, Right-click > View Page Info
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Keyboard%20shortcuts Keyboard Shortcuts]
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Viewing%20video%20in%20Firefox%20without%20a%20plugin Viewing Video without Plugins]
    [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder & Files]
    [https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Command_Line_Options#Browser Firefox Commands]
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Basic%20Troubleshooting Basic Troubleshooting]
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/common-questions-after-upgrading-firefox-36 After Upgrading]
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe%20Mode Safe Mode]
    [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions Problematic Extensions]
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting%20extensions%20and%20themes Troubleshooting Extensions and Themes]
    [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting%20plugins Troubleshooting Plugins]
    [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Testing_plugins Testing Plugins]

  • I am having a problem with my cs6 running very slow and when i save i am getting an error message that says, "This document is bigger than 2 gb (the file may not be read correctly by some TIFF viewers.) please help

    I am having a problem with my cs6 running very slow and when i save i am getting an error message that says, "This document is bigger than 2 gb (the file may not be read correctly by some TIFF viewers.) please help

    wen6275,
    It looks like you're actually using a camera or phone to take a photo of your monitor.
    That's not what is commonly known as a "screen shot". 
    It looks like you're on a Mac.  Hitting Command+Shift+3 places a capture of the contents of your entire monitor on your Desktop; hitting Command+Shift+4 will give you a cross-hairs cursor for you to select just the portion you want to capture.
    I'm mentioning this because I fear I'm not construing your original post correctly when you type "I am working with a large files [sic], currently it has 149 layers, all of which are high resolution photographs", so I'm wondering if there's some similar use of your own idiosyncratic nomenclature in your description of your troublesome file.
    Perhaps I'm just having a major senior moment myself, but I'm utterly unable to imagine such a file.  Would you mind elaborating?

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I display a single indicator based on a percentage calculation?

    See... I have one column # of Activities. A second column is the # of activities with a condition (FILTER("Activity Metrics"."# of Activities" USING ((Activity.PICK_4 LIKE '%Cliente Contactado%' OR Activity.PICK_4 LIKE '%Cliente No Contactado%')))).

  • While installing OD XE 11 g, I get error message just before finish

    the message is like couln't get data local {7e-ie-....) XE registration. I have downlaoded the zip file for win 32. i was told that this prg will install in my 64 bit OS (Windows 7). A: While installing OD XE 11 g, I get error message just before fin

  • Late 2011 Macbook Pro Freezing ......

    My Macbook Pro keeps freezing and it is driving me crazy. It typically freezes about 3 times a week. I usually have my Macbook Pro attached to a 23" Cinema Display (With Macbook Pro screen closed), 2 daisy chained external WD mybook external drives (

  • Can I save my preferences in Bridge CS4?

    I regularly back up my Photoshop CS4 preferences file (Adobe Photoshop X64 CS4 Prefs.psp). That way, if I have to trash my current prefs because Photoshop has gone haywire, I can simply copy the last good backup to the [Users...] folder, and I don't

  • Imovie: cant share to facebook due to "wrong password

    when trying to share a movie or a trailer to facebook I am unable to log on to fb due to "incorrect password.  However this is the password !!!