Finder not taking into account local backups when reporting free disk space

Time Machine in Lion (10.7.2) stores local backups of files on your laptop's hard drive when it is not connected to an external Time Machine backup drive. See this article for more information.
If you click on the Apple in the top-left corner of your screen and choose About This Mac > More Info > Storage, you will see exactly how much space your local "Backups" are taking (along with other useful info about how your hard drive space is being used).
Interestingly, the amount of free HD space listed there differes from the amount of free space Finder says is available (when you choose View > Show Status Bar to display it). The amount that it differs is exactly the same as the amount of the local "Backups." So, it appears that Finder is not taking those local Backus into account when it displays free disk space.
So, Finder is telling me I have almost 100 gigs MORE free space than I actually have. I would prefer Finder to show me how much space I have AFTER the local Backups are taken into account.

The article that you linked to gives the rationale for this:
Note: You may notice a difference in available space statistics between Disk Utility, Finder, and Get Info inspectors. This is expected and can be safely ignored. The Finder displays the available space on the disk without accounting for the local snapshots, because local snapshots will surrender their disk space if needed.

Similar Messages

Planned orders are not taking into account the processing time

Hi,
Could you please tell me why planned orders quantities are not based on processing time from the material master.
Materials was set before with 1 day in house production , no matter of lot size.
Based on routings I updated material master with processing time depending on lot size.
What is bottering me now is that planned orders are not taking into account processing time. (e.g. based on my processing time 1000 pce are produced in 3 days, but planned orders show me that 1000 pce are still need in 1 day , but it can not be produced in 1 day ).
what did I miss?
Thanks a lot for any information!

Hello Simona
The in house production time from tab MRP 2 is lot size independent.
However, on tab work scheduling you can define a lot size dependent times.
Please observe that, if you have entered an in house production time, the processing time will not be considered. The F1 help of the field provides the following explanation:
You can define work scheduling times in the material master record in one of two ways:
Either you enter the in-house production time. If required, you can get the system to update this value from the routing.
Or you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.
Therefore, if you want to consider the processing time, you should remove the in house processing time.
BR
Caetano

How can I fix this? Text and images collide, space and margins are not taking into account. The whole page layout is a mess.

Hi,
Whatever I design in muse is totally different from what the preview in the browser shows. Texts crashed with images, and spaces and margins are not taken into account,
Is there a way to fix this? Is it a bug?
Thanks.

Hi Federico,
Please take a look at this forum post for a similar discussion : Aligning multiple HTML objects on one page?
Regards,
Aish

Updating textfield with DEL key not taking into account

I have a decimal field which accepts only numerals...
after modifying the value in the field and pressing an OK button...the new value is reflected in a table...
but if i modify the same field value using the "delete" key and press OK...the new value is not taken into account....
but the same works with "backspace" key...
So do i need to set anything to respond to del key...
Thanks

Also i am not able to put the code here as it is a huge applicationI did not ask for your entire application. I asked for
demo code means code that we can compile and execute, but it only contains the code relevant to your problem
Here is an example:
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
public class DemoCode extends JFrame
     JTextField textField;
     public DemoCode()
          textField = new JTextField();
          getContentPane().add(textField, BorderLayout.NORTH);
          JButton button = new JButton("Update Database");
          button.addActionListener( new ActionListener()
               public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
                    System.out.println(textField.getText());
                    textField.setText("");
                    textField.requestFocusInWindow();
          getContentPane().add(button, BorderLayout.SOUTH);
     public static void main(String[] args)
          JFrame frame = new DemoCode();
          frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
          frame.pack();
          frame.setLocationRelativeTo( null );
          frame.setVisible(true);
}If you can't create a simple demo then you don't understand your problem and if you don't understand your problem then how are we supposed to?
custom field So you probably have a coding problem and we have no idea what your code looks like
that accepts only decimal values and why are you not using JFormattedTextField?
And this problem is not seen if i modify the custom field using any other key say like "Backspace".Again this problem doesn't make sense since the character should be removed from the text field before the OK button is pressed.

Corruption of User privileges on folder hierarchy (not taken into account ANYMORE)

Hello.
We use Portal 3.0.6.3.3 (still EA release) on NT with Oracle 8iR2.
We have set a Content Area and a very classical folder hierarchy to be managed by a single user (called administrator having all privileges on all folders) and other users having just the "Manage Items" and "View Content" for all folders, starting with the root folder.
It has worked perfectly for a while but after further work on privileges that, unfortunately, we cannot trace back, we have our folders not taking into account the privileges set (under the Access Tab) anymore.
Actually all users have now all privileges on the whole folder hierarchy. It means, an "Edit Folder" not only provides the "Add Item" link option but also all other options (Folder Properties, etc) are available.
We have checked again and again the privileges on the CA, root folder, folders etc, tried and removed and re-created the users or new users etc without success.
We imagine some privilege management-related table of the Content Area/Folder are "corrupted".
How could we return to a normal situation? On which tables of Portal schema should we investigate and try to find out what is going on?
Thanks for any help.
null

... still me.
OK, forget my question. It appears that some "generic" group priviliges (AUTHENTICATED_USERS) had been changed by mistake thus overriding any other settings of the users and groups we were contemplating. So everything is under control now...
Thanks for having read anyway ;-)

CK11N Follow-up material not taken into account when costing

We are running the standard cost with quantity structure and we have detected that all the follow-up information is not taken into account to determine the bill of materials that will be used to calculate the standard cost.
SAP helpdesk has answered me the following:
"The situation in product cost planning is we do not check availability of any material stocks, and therefore we cannot provide the same functionality as MRP. You will have to create a new BOM that includes
the follow-up material or apply the modification to take into account the follow-up part."
Please, if anyone knows any user-exit we could use to develop something to fix it, we would appreciate it very much. It is a normal process and we can not say it does not work.
Regards, and waiting for any solution.
Yolanda.

Dear,
Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Zero values not taken into account during retraction

Hello,
we are having an issue with data retraction.
When we reset a value to zero, the change in the value is not taken into account and the corresponding value in R/3 remains unchanged.
There are some posts that say that the function modules UPR_COST_PLAN_EXEC and UPR_COST_PLAN_INIT should be modified in order to populate <xth_data> with zero values, but debug mode shows that the data are read before calling these functions, and the zero values are
already ignored at this stage.
Could anyone help me, please?
Thank you in advance!

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

Index not taken into account

Dear experts,
I have the following problem. Even though table VEPO has the necessary index (by unvel), it is not taken into account in my select statement:
        SELECT SINGLE *
          INTO wa_vepo_line
          FROM *vepo
         WHERE unvel = wa_vepo_line-venum .
the index is standard and is called : A : Selection by subordinate shipping unit and it is certainly activated.
What might be wrong?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Roxani

hi
the system picks up the primary keys or index at the runtime...it is not possible to find out which one it will pick!
try to add vepos in ur where condition.
avoid select * . specify the required fields IF possible..
regards,
madhu

Complaint wth ref. to invoice in CRM - Copy control not taken into account!

Hi all,
We are facing problems when replicating return orders (business object Complaint) with reference to invoices in ERP.
The copy control in ERP is not taken into account. Does anyone know if it is possible to check the copy control when replicating the complaint to ERP with reference to the invoice?
The return order is being replicated correctly and the link to the invoice is shown (so, the flow is correct).
But:
1.- The manual pricing conditions in the invoice in ERP are not being copied in the return order.
2.- Some data as the 'Incoterms' is being redetermined from the customer master data and is not being copied from the invoice.
3.- Data related to material is also being redetermined when the order is replicated
The copy control is not being taken into account and we can replicate return orders from CRM to ERP with reference to invoices for which the copy control is not maintained in ERP...
Please help...
Thanks in advance!
Yolanda

Try something like this, in place of ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'ZZDEP2PVNDPGM'..
ls_input_field_names-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_input_field_names-ref_handle = '100'.
insert ls_input_field_names into table lt_input_field_names.
Edited by: Kevin Alcock on Aug 10, 2009 4:03 PM

WebLogic 11g: Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account

Hello,
I'm trying to set up Production Redeployment on my EAR, under WebLogic 10.3.6.
However, I can't figure out how to make Weblogic-Application-Version work in MANIFEST.MF
Here is my EAR structure:
MyApplication
--- APP-INF
--- --- lib
--- --- classes
--- META-INF
--- --- application.xml
--- --- weblogic-application.xml
--- --- MANIFEST.MF <- file I update
--- WebApp1
--- --- META-INF
--- --- --- MANIFEST.MF
--- --- WEB-INF
--- --- --- classes
--- --- --- lib
--- --- --- web.xml
--- --- --- weblogic.xml
--- WebApp2
--- --- same as WebApp1
MANIFEST.MF content is the following:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1
The problem is that it's not taken into account when I deploy the application in the WebLogic console.
When I use staged mode, the line Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1 is removed from the staged MANIFEST.MF file.
The only way to manage to version my application is to add the flag -appversion to weblogic.Deployer, but I don't want to use that on a Production environment (and it's not recommended in the documentation!).
Any idea why Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account? I tried to add debug mode to node weblogic/debug but with no success.
Thanks by advance,
Julien

I tested it at my end and was able to redeploy it successfully with the application versions.
Are you saying that by deploying through weblogic console,the archive version is not honoring/getting picked up .is that correct?
if yes, what does your weblogic console shows for archive version,when you first try to deploy your application with the VERSION_1.
I mean,when you are on the "Optional Settings" Page.Do you see the Archive Version as VERSION_1?
Deployments >> Click on the Install >> select your application ( MyAPP)>> Install this deployment as an application >> Select deployment targets >> Optional Settngs
Example from the Optional settings Page for My application
What do you want to name this deployment?
Name: MyAPP
Archive Version:
VERSION_1
This can confirm that the application being deployed is versioned one and if it doesn't shows up,then you need to check why its not getting picked up.?
Moreover,You can enable the "deploy" debug flag to see whats going wrong in your case during the deployment process
Server > Debug > Weblogic > Deploy
Do refer the below viewlet on the Production Redeployment
http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/wls/redeployment/wls-side-by-side-non-annotation_viewlet_swf.html

What are the relevent steps to take in tracking a lost iphone 5 taking into account that the battery was dead at the time

What are the relevent steps to take in tracking a lost iphone 5 taking into account that the battery was dead at the time

You would have neede to have "Find my phone" activated on the iphone
Log into icloud https://www.icloud.com/ and track.

Cancellation Internal Credit memo is not posted into Accounting

Hello All,
We have a requirement where the cancellation internal credit memo is not posted into accounting. It is a inter company sales return process. After return delivery, client created the internal credit memo. But due to some problem they cancelled the internal credit memo. But now system is not posted the cancellation internal credit memo into accounting. I did my analysis and found that client is using same number range for internal credit memo and accounting document. When internal credit memo is created system is assign the same number range to accounting document because of external number range field is ticked in Fbn1 .But due to wrong number assignment in internal credit memo. So when they cancel the internal credit memo, this internal credit memo number range is coming within the accounting document number range.But client is insisting that anyhow the cancel inter credit memo should be posted to accounting.
I have tried a lot. but i could not reach out to any solution. Kindly help me on proving me a solution on this.
Regards
Soumendu

Dear Soumendu:
I had received this warning when the invoice was cleared. If you revert this process is possible to post the cancellation into accounting.
Please check the status of the invoice.
Regards
Antonio Martinez R.

New values not taken into account in MASS / XD99

I am trying to use a background job to block Customers for Billing at month end.
In MASS/XD99 I created a variant to update field KNVV-FAKSD (Sales Area Billing Block).
But running the variant in background (using MASSBACK), it seems the new values I thought I saved in the variant in MASS/XD99 are not taken into account.
I opened the variant again in MASS/XD99 and indeed it seems it had not saved the new values, because the screen again shows the current values.
Tried a couple of times again, but everytime I open the variant I have saved again, the new values revert back to 'current values'.
Is this the reason MASSBACK is also making no updates? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance for your comments & advice.

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

HS.EXP does not take into account the Value member and the source

Hello,
The formula is put in the "Entity Curr Adjs" part of the Sub Calculate.
The expression is the following and apply for one entity (Holding method) I filtered previously and the ICP Entity has proportionnal method with 50% rate:
HS.Exp "A#5420.I#[ICP None].C1#REC.C2#[None].C3#[None].C4#Recla_IAS_Aut_RetS_5=
A#5340.V#[Contribution].E#Logista_E_TBCO.I#UTE_O.C1#CLO.C2#TotC2.C3#TotC3.C4#TotC4"
The data I would like to retrieve is the one in Contribution Value as I put on the source part of the expression.
And yet, the data I get is the one of the Entity Currency and Proportion Value, which is different because the ICP has proportionnal method (50%) and the Contribution value is the result of Proportion - Elimination values.
To sum up: I obtain a data of 50 instead of 25.
I checked that the data I see in my form corresponds to the source parameters but it seems that it does not take into account the Value parameter.
Could it be that it is not possible to use a Contribution Value source for an Entity Currency Adjs destination?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Julien

Hi,
I see another problem in what you're trying to do. First, let me state what you're trying to establish: you are trying to get a value from one entity (say A) to another entity (say B), be it at [Proportion], [Elimination], [Contribution], ...
My question is: how can you know that during the consolidation process, by the time your code runs on B, A has already been processed and [Proportion], [Elimination] are not empty (or contain values from a previous consolidation run)?
The answer is "You don't". Theoretically, you have no control as per the order in which entities are calculated/consolidated during the process. Even more complex is the thing that if you have a multi-core machine, more than one entities may run in parallel, but still you cannot force A to run before B. I have done some tests and I've seen that in a one processor setting the order that entities enter in the process of consolidation matches the order you have placed them in the consolidation tree in metadata. Still this thing is not documented as far as I know and therefore you cannot rely on this.
Finally, I have also seen that in a simple case (B pulls from A), if you run consolidation twice, then you definitely get correct values. By the time you make a change in A, you have to run consolidation twice again to make sure that you get the correct data. I believe that you see that what I'm describing is good for experimenting but not for releasing to a client.
I tend to think of such a design, as a practice to avoid.
--Kostas

"Not Enough Free Disk Space" error message, but Finder shows plenty of disk space available

Apologies if this is a double post, but I have been searching all over and can't seem to find this issue in the forums.
I have a 256GB Macbook with a fresh copy of Lion installed, am going through the process of migrating files back over, after which I have approximately 125GB free. However, whenever I go online and try to download any type of file (PDF, sofware install files, etc.), an error message displays saying:
Safari could not download the file “blahblahblah.dmg” because there is not enough free disk space.
Not sure how this is possible since the .dmg file is 18MB and Finder is saying there is over 125GB free. I've tried repairing disk permissions, booting off the Lion recovery disk and repairing the startup disk, all to no avail. Anyone had this issue before?

Don Archibald wrote:
Check in Safari's Preferences (in the Safari menu) to see what has been designated as the destination for downloads. If that has somehow been set to a disk image or a CD/DVD location, you'll get that 'not enough space' message.
The same may occur if the download target location is set to a non-available drive. This can happen when aliases are used and things have been copied (migrated) from another drive.
Thanks for the suggestion. That wasn't the problem, but your suggestion did shed light on something else. I was able to perform a right-click action and Save File As... to my Documents folder. On further analysis, it appears that the "Macintosh HD", Downloads folder, and Desktop are showing the "pencil with a line through it" icon in the bottom left of the Finder window, which would suggest those areas are read-only for some reason.
My user account is the only one on the machine and it's an admin account. Any guesses as to why that might have set itself that way, or any suggestions on how to change it? I've already tried repairing permissions on the startup disk in Disk Utility.

Finder not taking into account local backups when reporting free disk space

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for