Fios Network Terminal power consumption

Hello,
Does anyone know how much power my Alcatel lucent ( I 211m h ) (3fe51852aaac) Fios network terminal uses.
We live in a multi-family house situation, and the other party pays for basement power, where the box is plugged in.
Thank you very much.

mileage definetely varies from install to install, but here are a few links that will get you pretty close to the answer your looking for.
http://lancej.blogspot.com/2008/03/verizon-fios-electricity-use.html
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18599695-

Similar Messages

[Solved] High power consumption of eth0

Hi everyone,
i successfully installed Arch on my new Acer Travelmate P653-MG a few months ago with the Gnome DE. Everything worked fine until a few weeks ago, when i discovered a really hard power regression due to my network interface. Before i had a solid 12 W of power consumption (without that much of finetuning), but afterwards my power consumption jumped to 23-25 W. I have attached two screenshots of my current powertop output:
http://i.imgur.com/8tpSnXf.png
http://i.imgur.com/CaVg61A.png
Unfortunately i can't quite say when this regression occured, so as to point to a certain update. My first guess was, this had to be kernel specific, but the downgrade from kernel 3.7 to 3.6 brought no results. I must admit after hours of searching google, the arch wiki and the forum here, i'm at a complete loss. I have discovered no one with a similar problem.
If anyone can help me in this matter, your help would be very much appreciated!
My current kernel parameters are: quiet splash nmi_watchdog=0 acpi_osi=linux acpi_backlight=vendor
Please tell me any outputs i can provide which could be of help to you.
Greetings
-- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
Last edited by ToshiroTaicho (2013-02-16 22:08:07)

Thanks for your suggestions, but i was finally able to figure it out myself. linux-lts was unfortunately no option for me, as i want to use bumblebee. But the direction, this pointed me to was good. It seems one of the kernel updates broke my bumblebee package, so the power management didnt work and the card was constantly powered on. This was nothing new, but my powertop completely messed it up, by adding this additional power consumption to eth0. Funny enough, this power consumption even disappeared, when i unloaded eth0. After deleting powertops saved results and recalibrating it, it now shows up all components power usage correctly.
Thus i mark this thread as SOLVED.

[SOLVED] Huge power consumption after kernel upgrade.

Dear All,
I have recently bought the new lenovo thinkpad X1 equipped with a Core I5 processors and 4GB of RAM.
I am quite satisfied with this machine except for the fact that the fan is extremely loud (but perhaps a bios upgrade will fix problem).
Now my problem:
When I first installed Arch (first days of August) I ran powertop and the power consumption was around 10 Watts when idle with wifi card turned off.
Now, after some upgrades, the power consumption raises to 18W in idle and consequently the battery lasts less than 2h.
Here my current configuration:
Linux think-x1 3.0-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Aug 30 08:53:25 CEST 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
and here the powertop output obtained with the cpu frequency governor set to "On demand":
Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running) ( 5.3%) Turbo Mode 0.1%
polling 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 2.50 Ghz 0.0%
C1 mwait 0.2ms ( 0.1%) 2.21 Ghz 0.0%
C2 mwait 0.3ms ( 0.0%) 1200 Mhz 0.1%
C3 mwait 2.4ms ( 0.0%) 800 Mhz 99.8%
C4 mwait 13.1ms (94.6%)
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 76.1 interval: 3.0s
Power usage (ACPI estimate): 15.7W (2.8 hours)
Top causes for wakeups:
46.5% (135.7) kworker/0:0
17.7% ( 51.7) PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad interrupt
11.9% ( 34.7) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick
8.6% ( 25.0) [iwlagn] <interrupt>
2.9% ( 8.3) [i915] <interrupt>
2.6% ( 7.7) [acpi] <interrupt>
1.8% ( 5.3) chromium
1.6% ( 4.7) [kernel core] hrtimer_start (tick_sched_timer)
1.5% ( 4.3) kworker/0:1
0.7% ( 2.0) minilogd
0.7% ( 2.0) [kernel core] iwl_bg_watchdog (iwl_bg_watchdog)
0.6% ( 1.7) X
0.6% ( 1.7) [kernel core] intel_gpu_idle_timer (intel_gpu_idle_timer)
0.3% ( 1.0) Terminal
0.3% ( 1.0) [kernel core] tpt_trig_timer (tpt_trig_timer)
0.2% ( 0.7) [mmc0, mei, ehci_hcd:usb3] <interrupt>
0.2% ( 0.7) upowerd
0.1% ( 0.3) init
0.1% ( 0.3) gpg-agent
0.1% ( 0.3) [kernel core] ieee80211_sta_reset_conn_monitor (ieee80211_sta_conn_mon_timer)
0.1% ( 0.3) wicd-client
0.1% ( 0.3) kworker/u:3
0.1% ( 0.3) watchdog/0
I have also tried to disable most of the running daemons and unload some modules, but I have never got less than 14/15W when idle, which in my opinion is definitely too much!
As far as I'm concerned, the kworker process is responsible most of the wakeups.
Any ideas?
Last edited by jacopo_c (2011-09-05 13:12:16)

pogeymanz wrote:I read somewhere that the kernel devs really don't see this as an issue. They just expect that laptop owners should know to try these boot parameters. So, definitely not by 3.1.
from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727579:
Dave Jones 2011-08-03 15:32:21 EDT
enabling it by default in 3.0 caused regressions for some people, so it was
disabled. Hopefully Intel figures it out, and we can switch it back on by
default in 3.1 / 2.6.41 (until then, you'll have to set it by hand).
Interesting stuff, also recommend this thread on phoronix:
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.p … Regression
Last edited by masteryod (2011-09-12 00:30:00)

X220, dmesg reports hardware error, powertop abnormal power consumption by some devices

Hi, Linux dmesg command reports this: [ 2072.470923] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 2072.470926] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 2072.470929] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 2072.470932] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1) [ 2072.476690] CPU3: Package power limit normal [ 2072.476697] CPU2: Package power limit normal [ 2072.476717] CPU0: Package power limit normal [ 2072.476726] CPU1: Package power limit normal [ 2096.847029] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [ 4569.973367] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 2) [ 4569.973378] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 2) [ 4569.973391] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 2) [ 4569.973401] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 2) [ 4570.018411] CPU2: Package power limit normal [ 4570.018415] CPU0: Package power limit normal [ 4570.018417] CPU1: Package power limit normal [ 4570.018419] CPU3: Package power limit normal [ 4643.555059] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [ 4979.410447] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 20) [ 4979.410458] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 20) [ 4979.410471] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 20) [ 4979.410481] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 20) [ 4979.416993] CPU0: Package power limit normal [ 4979.416997] CPU1: Package power limit normal [ 4979.417000] CPU3: Package power limit normal [ 4979.417002] CPU2: Package power limit normal [ 5092.974067] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged powetop reports this power consumption, I think that usb, biometric coprocessor and network interface (interfaz de red) are very high. 9.49 W 100,0% Dispositivo USB: Biometric Coprocessor (UPEK) 6.65 W 100,0% Códec de audio hwC0D0: Conexant (pulseaudio ) 100,0% Códec de audio hwC0D3: Intel 5.70 W 100,0% Display backlight 5.70 W 100,0% Display backlight 3.94 W 100,0% Dispositivo USB: F5521gw (Lenovo) 2.61 W 36498 pkts/s Interfaz de red: eth3 (e1000e) Would somebody at Lenovo check this, please? Regards. PD: I'm the guy that hods number of motherboard changed record, three in two months,

I am seeing similar messages along with intermittent system hanging on my T420 (4178-CTO). Flashplayer seems to exacerbate matters.
dmesg:
[ 1431.599033] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1182)
[ 1431.599037] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1182)
[ 1431.599039] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1182)
[ 1431.599042] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1182)
[ 1431.610014] CPU1: Package power limit normal
[ 1431.610017] CPU3: Package power limit normal
[ 1431.610020] CPU2: Package power limit normal
[ 1431.610022] CPU0: Package power limit normal
[ 1499.180524] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
[ 1788.410430] plugin-containe[3925]: segfault at a9ffd604 ip b298cd61 sp b15b41bc error 4 in libflashplayer.so[b27b8000+fc8000]
[ 2557.130041] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1186)
[ 2557.130045] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1186)
[ 2557.130048] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1186)
[ 2557.130051] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1186)
[ 2557.142042] CPU1: Package power limit normal
[ 2557.142045] CPU3: Package power limit normal
[ 2557.142047] CPU2: Package power limit normal
[ 2557.142049] CPU0: Package power limit normal
[ 2697.643317] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
[ 2860.459336] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1339)
[ 2860.459339] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1339)
[ 2860.459343] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1339)
[ 2860.459346] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1339)
[ 2860.472336] CPU3: Package power limit normal
[ 2860.472339] CPU1: Package power limit normal
[ 2860.472342] CPU0: Package power limit normal
[ 2860.472344] CPU2: Package power limit normal
[ 2942.466964] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Tx aggregation enabled on ra = 00:fe:f4:50:e4:d8 tid = 6
[ 3146.075653] [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
[ 3189.399548] CPU3: Package power limit notification (total events = 1424)
[ 3189.399551] CPU2: Package power limit notification (total events = 1424)
[ 3189.399555] CPU1: Package power limit notification (total events = 1424)
[ 3189.399558] CPU0: Package power limit notification (total events = 1424)
[ 3189.410570] CPU2: Package power limit normal
[ 3189.410573] CPU3: Package power limit normal
[ 3189.410575] CPU1: Package power limit normal
[ 3189.410578] CPU0: Package power limit normal
[ 3239.200744] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Tx aggregation enabled on ra = 00:fe:f4:50:e4:d8 tid = 3
mcelog:
CPU 0 THERMAL EVENT TSC 47d41bb8fbb
TIME 1325511755 Mon Jan 2 13:42:35 2012
Processor 0 below trip temperature. Throttling disabled
STATUS c000000088320c08 MCGSTATUS 0
MCGCAP c07 APICID 0 SOCKETID 0
CPUID Vendor Intel Family 6 Model 42
Hardware event. This is not a software error.
MCE 3
CPU 1 THERMAL EVENT TSC 47d41bba1ee
TIME 1325511755 Mon Jan 2 13:42:35 2012
Processor 1 below trip temperature. Throttling disabled
STATUS c000000088320c08 MCGSTATUS 0
MCGCAP c07 APICID 1 SOCKETID 0
CPUID Vendor Intel Family 6 Model 42
Hardware event. This is not a software error.
MCE 4
CPU 3 THERMAL EVENT TSC 47d437f3745
TIME 1325511755 Mon Jan 2 13:42:35 2012
Processor 3 below trip temperature. Throttling disabled
STATUS c000000088300808 MCGSTATUS 0
martinus@3d6:~/cam/test$ tail /var/log/mcelog
MCGCAP c07 APICID 0 SOCKETID 0
CPUID Vendor Intel Family 6 Model 42
Hardware event. This is not a software error.
MCE 7
CPU 2 THERMAL EVENT TSC 7e2f9f9347b
TIME 1331482204 Sun Mar 11 16:10:04 2012
Processor 2 below trip temperature. Throttling disabled
STATUS c000000088230808 MCGSTATUS 0
MCGCAP c07 APICID 2 SOCKETID 0
CPUID Vendor Intel Family 6 Model 42

Esoteric topic - power consumption

Got out my Kill A Watt meter tonight to get an idea of the actual power consumption of the MacPro and peripheral. Tomorrow I'll use the cumulative reading for an hour with the computer, monitor, and speakers on to calculate $/hr - I expect it will be higher than I would have thought.
MacPro alone: 335 watt (~ 2.80 amp)
MacPro sleep: .13 amp
MacPro off: .08 amp
Samsung 24" LCD, SyncMaster 245BW
on: .44 amp, 52 watt
sleep: .01 amp
Speakers, KRK Rokit 5 Studio Monitors, self powered
on: .13 amp, 16 watt each, X2= .26 amp,32 watt
So, the total current to run the computer, monitor, and speakers is 419 watts, or exactly the power of 7 ea. 60 watt light bulbs. No wonder it gets warm in the computer room. Much more power than I thought, and will get me thinking of getting it and the monitor to sleep more often, and put in a switch for the speakers rather than leave them on 24/7.
Tomorrow I'll leave it all on for one hour in cumulative mode, then figure out cost/hr. based on our cost of electricty KWH written on our electric bill.
My wife did say she thought the electric bill had gone up a little since we got this new computer. Lets blame it on Leopard <g>
John F

Good topic. I'm actually thinking about putting all my networking gear (firewall, cable router) and speakers on one power strip and turning it off at night. My MBP is set to sleep after an hour of non-use and I sold off all my windoze gear. I doubt my Time Capsule is designed to be shut on and off every day, so I'll probably leave that on.
My goal is to reduce as much power consumption when I'm not at home or asleep.
Thanks for the post!

Monitor outlet power consumption

I'm interested in monitoring power consumption at specific outlets in a facility using Labview and NI DAQ systems. Essentially what I'd like to do would be to use one specific outlet as a monitoring point for all the rest of the outlets in a facility or connected to that circuit. I'd like to be able to create a network map of the outlets to be monitored by sending some sort of signal back to the monitoring DAQ so I can label each outlet specifically and then keep monitoring it continuously to see how much power is being consumed at that outlet. Any suggestions on how I can approach this problem or if this is feasible? Thanks!

Lynn,
Thanks for the help. I'll do my best to clarify.
My hope was that if I could create a type of network diagram or circuit map for a facility, or even simpler than that, for a room in a facility, that I coud monitor power consumption at any of the outlets from one single outlet. The basic data I'd like initially would be energy consumption/kWh data for what is consumed at that specific outlet. The accuracy can be just down to the .1 kWh and I'd like to be able to view the data at something like 5 minute intervals, maybe down to the minute.
A simple hypothetical exaple of what I'd want to do would be to take a room in a lab. Lets say I've got a DAQ hooked up to one outlet for monitoring. On the other side of the lab a cooler is plugged into another outlet. I'd like to measure the consumption or energy usage of that cooler at the monitoring outlet without having to add any equipment to where the cooler is plugged in, like a wattmeter. I thought this might be possible by using sending some type of signal from the cooler outlet to initially "map" the circuit (ie some type of AM signal on top of the power signal). But then I didn't know if it would be possible to keep monitoring that outlet and others with other equipment attached to them just from my monitoring point and without wattmeters, etc.
It sounds like you're saying this is not possible. So if I had to have something plugged into each outlet I wanted to monitor what could I use for a room that is simplest and cheapest? Any further info is helpful and I'll keep trying to clarify, I've done a lot of DAQ work before but not really much involving monitoring power like this. Thanks!

[Request] cryogenic kernel module to reduce power consumption

Hi there,
I found a very interesting kernel module to reduce power consumption. It is called cryogenic:
Cryogenic is a Linux kernel module that allows to reduce energy consumption by means of enabling cooperative clustering of I/O operations among the various applications that make use of the same hardware device. In order to achieve this target, Cryogenic provides an API that enables applications to schedule I/O operations on SCSI and network devices at times where the impact the operations have on energy consumption is small.
https://gnunet.org/cryogenic
Is someone interested in packaging this for the AUR?
Thanks!

What part of that document led you to think it would automagically reduce power consumption without application support?
I saw that document (and it is the same as your first post... 106 pages..meh), all points me to (still) think that applications have to explicitely support cryogenic to take advantage from it, is pretty clear:
Page 28
In this section we present the way developers should use Cryoge nic’s API in order to
benefit from its capabilities . We illustrate with examples the code that must be added to modify the behaviour of any application and give a clearer idea of the execution flow .
Did you read that document, yes?
Last edited by kokoko3k (2014-03-29 16:04:11)

Power consumption with 5 Cisco CISCO AP1131G etc.

Hello everyone
I need to calculate our Cisco's network equipment's total max power consumption to choose UPS model.
We have following equipments in house.
CISCO 1941 integrated service router with WIC-1T-Use serial interface card (it says max 110w)
CISCO ASA5505 Firewall (it says max 96w)
Linksys slm224p unknown Wattage with 5 Cisco access Point AP1131G (18w each) connected through PoE ports
There is spec sheet of slm224P which doesn't specify it's own power consumption. (attached PDF)
On rear panel of SLM224p it says 3A, if this is his consumption being connected to 220v power line, it might consume 660W
but it seems too much for a single switch without PoE ?
Any idea or comments would be appreciated.
Best Regards
tomoaki

Here's some links:
Overview:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5679/ps8368/product_data_sheet0900aecd8066a16c.html
Installation:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/1520/installation/guide/1520_ch1.html
The following document says 25 Watts typical (~2 amps @ 12VDC) with a Max of 50 Watts (~4 amps @ 12 VDC)
(Quote)
Q. What is the power draw from the Cisco Aironet 1520 Series?
A. The power draw varies with the type of options specified with the Cisco Aironet 1520 Series. Typical power draw is less than 25 watts. Maximum power draw can be up to 50 watts.
(End Quote)
From here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5679/ps8368/prod_qas0900aecd8066a17b_ns756_Networking_Solutions_Q_and_A.html
Good Luck
Scott

My Sling Player Does Not Work Remotely on Fios Networks

My sling box is set up locally on a high speed internet in LA.
I have not been able to use my sling player remotely on any FIOS Network.
Other friends have used my computer to connect to their Sling Box and it has worked fine, BUT their Sling Boxes are set up locally on FIOS networks. Mine is on DSL.
btw, it does work remotely on a cable network.
My question is,
"why would sling player not work remotely on a FIOS network, when the sling box is set up locally on a DSL line?"
"Are there any settings that I could change on the local router that would make this problem go away?"
BTW my router is Westell A90
Thanks

Sound like you don't have port forwarding enabled in your Westell A90 for the slingbox.
You would need to go into admin on the Westell router and enable port forwarding for the relevant port to the ipa address of the slingbox. I believe some slingboxes can attempt to do this for you in their configuration.

Since I have upgraded from 7.1 then the power consumption increased slightly unbelievable. I have new batteries in my iphone 5 and when I had at ios 7 so was consumption that allows the battery envelope in two days and with ios 7.1 so is it only 12 hours

Since I have upgraded from 7.1 then the power consumption increased slightly unbelievable. I have new batteries in my iphone 5 and when I had at ios 7 so was consumption that allows the battery envelope in two days and with ios 7.1 so is it only 12 hours before I need to recharge the battery.

Wrote a little wrong the first time!
Then I upgraded to 7.1 so have power consumption increased slightly unbelievable. I have new batteries in my iphone 5 and when I had at ios 7 so was consumption that allows the battery envelope in two days and with ios 7.1 so is it only 12 hours before I need to recharge the battery.

3000 J converted to NAS, Are there fan control settings/ways to reduce power consumption?

So I've had this old 3000 J series - (J115 7388) that's been sitting doing nothing for a while, so I decided to convert it into a FreeNAS, I've stripped out the DVD, card readers, anything unneccesary to reduce power usage - on that theme I have a few questions...
1. Is there a setting in the BIOS to automate the fans as & when needed to make the system quieter & to reduce power consumption - there will be 2x 2tb WD green drives in there with an idle time of 5 mins, atm I'm using one 320GB HDD from an old laptop - the system won't be used 90% of the time & I'd like it to be able to react when needed rather than constantly be on
the specs http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/detail.page?LegacyDocID=MIGR-67129 say the fan is variable, but I can't see anything obvious in the BIOS, it did take me some time to find the boot order, so maybe I'm overlooking something
So that's my main question & this is the bonus
2. I know there's an Nvidia C51G chipset in there somewhere, is it possible to remove this, there's no GUI on the pc anymore, so again, & also anything else like sound, just to make it as efficient as possible & not to have any unessesary components using power
I have downloaded updated the latest BIOS (circa 2007) onto another pc from http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS001014 - even if it does provide an update to what I already have - I did note 2007 already on the BIOS version, of course I can't run it to try to make a bootable usb as the downloaded exe is for XP
I'm having a little trouble with the Lenovo site UI, not sure if it's coding - the links to guides/docs/drivers/downloads on http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/guides-and-manuals/default.page?selector=expand just don't seem to be working for me

Are you sure there are no trojans or viruses on laptop? Also lounch the task manager and check out the service or application with deranged CPU loading while the laptop is in the idle mode. What is the power usage in the idle mode?
x220 | i5-2520m | Intel ssd 320 series | Gobi 2000 3G GPS | WiFi
x220 | i5-2520m | hdd 320 | Intel msata ssd 310 series | 3G GPS | WiFi
Do it well, worse becomes itself
Русскоязычное Сообщество English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español

Powermanager 1.60 has removed the abilty to show the current power consumption in the tray.

Hi,
well the topic says it. Powermanager 1.60 has removed the abilty to show the current power consumption in the tray.
I realy frustrated right now, why the heck did they remove this nice feature?
And this new energy slider is just trash. If i change back to advanced mode, i cant see my current power consumption. Nor in the main battery tab. The field "Current Power" is just blank. And the option in the tray vanished.
What the **bleep** are these guys doing. There was a time i fought this powermanger is the best software ibm/lenovo ever produced, but since the change of the ui, and removing important features. Its unbeliveable.
Especialy if you are on windows xp, this looks like **bleep**, and this "new" gauge desgin, flickers and stops my mouse on hower over the new "Design".
a frustrated,
R61 user.

you should try uninstalling & re install it http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-70602
Message Edited by GMAC-R60 on 08-08-2009 12:38 PM
Thinkpad R61 7733-1GU
Thinkpad X61T 7762-54U
Thinkpad X60T 6363-4GU
Did a member help you today? Thank them with a Kudo!
If a post answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
Regards,
GMAC

Which is better in term of power consumption for L...

Hello!
I would like to know in terms of power consumption which connection type should I use on my Lumia 1020. 4G LTE or 3G. I'm not a person who watches movies on his smartphone, and I don't browse the Internet intensively using my smartphone. I use it to take pictures, check my e-mails, access Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Flickr.
Thank you.
Cosmin Petrenciuc

3G is in general less power hungry.

Cisco 2951 router AC-PoE power consumption, meaning of the mention "Platform Only" in the datasheet.

Hello,
I have a question regarding the power consumption of a Cisco 2951 router with an AC-PoE power supply (without PoE boost).
In fact in the table (n°7) of the Cisco 2900 Series ISR (G2) datasheet, that sum up the power consumption data for Cisco 2900 series routers there is the line : "Maximum Power with PoE Power Supply (Platform Only) (Watts)", and I would like to know what is exactly the meaning about the mention "Platform Only".
Thank you for your help, best regards,

Hi @francois.trarieux,
This is the maximum power that is consumed exclusively by the router from the PoE PS (Power Supply). The power capacity that the PoE PS gives to other PoE devices (IP Phones, Cameras, APs, etc) is specified in the line below "Maximum End-Point PoE Power Available from PoE Power Supply (Watts)" of the datasheet.
HTH.
Regards,
Martin, IT Specialist

2011 MacBook Pro hard drive power consumption

Does anyone know the differences in power consumption between the Apple-supplied 750GB 5400rpm HDD, 500GB 7200rpm HDD, and 256GB SSD drives? I'm currently using a 2011 MacBook Pro with an Apple-supplied 256GB SSD and I'm getting between 5-8 hours of battery life, depending on what I'm doing. I wish it could get closer to a full 10-hour battery life for longer trips, but I realize there's a price for performance. What's the best hard drive option to minimize power consumption? Are there any other tips for increasing battery life? Does it make a difference if you turn off Bluetooth and WiFi when you know you're not going to be able to use them? Thank you in advance for your reply.

Yes, turn Wi-Fi and BT off when not needed. That and your screen are the biggest power consumers. Keep the brightness as low as you can to conserve power.
17" 2.2GHz i7 Quad-Core MacBook Pro  8G RAM  750G HD + OCZ Vertex 3 SSD Boot HD 

Fios Network Terminal power consumption

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for