Firefox 3.6.13 is not compatible with the no-redirect plug-in recommended to me earlier.

firefox advises that this plug-in doesn't work with 3.6.13.
sometimes, a "do you want to allow this" query shows up when a page is redirected, but it becomes annoying when redirects occur frequently, as they do on my lenovo laptop running xp pro, sp 3, with a strong cable internet connection.
shouldn't firefox have the ability to prevent unwanted page redirects--without requiring repetitious actions by the user? otherwise, its value diminishes.
thanks.

That setting is meant as an accessibility feature so that people with disabilities do not get confused and not as a safety protection to stop redirecting.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/accessibility.blockautorefresh
* http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10-TECHS/guidelines.html#tech-configure-content-retrieval
The NoRedirect extension should still be working in Firefox 3.6.13
* NoRedirect: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/11787

Similar Messages

  • Firefox 3.6.16 is not compatible with the latest version of Flash

    I updated to the current version of Adobe Flash and now Firefox 3 cannot play videos properly.
    Nothing crashes, but what happens is that the video does not change during playback. The audio seems fine, but the video is stuck and only changes when the mouse moves off the video's rectangle and then back into the video's rectangle. Basically in order to watch a video I have to wiggle the mouse on the edge of the video so that I get a rough version of the animation.
    Firefox had this incompatibility with Flash once before and it was eventually fixed. IE works fine.
    I am running:
    Windows 7
    Firefox 3.6.16
    Flash (whatever was the version at the beginning of April 2011)

    Firefox 3.6.24 can be found here:
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    thank you
    Please mark "Solved" the answer that really solve the problem, to help others with a similar problem.

  • Firefox 5.0.1 would cause my Free Download Manager to be disabled because it is not compatibl with the new version. What ones are compatible and free?

    I have received a pop-up advisory from Firefox several times, saying that my Free Download Manager is not compatible with the recommended 5.0.1 upgrade and wold have to be disabled until the compatibility problem was corrected.
    (I think that I did download it, and that was when I got the first warning. I visited my download m manager shortly afterward, and all my download history had disappeared. I think that I then reversed the upgrade.)
    Since then, my emails will load only in Basic HTML, which I have several problems with. I don't know if that is a Google or a Firefox problem.
    So, my initial problem is that I need a reliable and easy to use free downloader before I can upgrade and get my Standard HTML back.
    What free Download Managers are compatible with Firefox 5.0.1?
    While we're at it, is 5.0.1 Beta? And what is Beta?

    Solution: (Free Download Manager)
    Go here: http://codecpack.co/download/Free_Download_Manager.html and download Free Download Manager 3.8.1067 Beta 3, it works perfectly with Firefox 5.0.1
    Solution: (to Google mail aka Gmail)
    I have had this problem for a while since I did a previous Firefox update, where I had to force Gmail to load in Basic HTML else it's next to impossible to use it. The solution is this: simply update your Java, and Gmail will work without a problem using Standard HTML. To update your Java go here: http://www.java.com/en/ and select "Free Java Download".
    And beta normally, universally, means "the not quite there yet version of the version we're aiming for" NORMALLY used during production and testing of a type of software.

  • Firefox 4 is not compatible with the skin i had been using for my browser, old factory black... i would prefer to keep this skin rather than use firefox 4... how can i revert back to the previous version of firefox?...

    ''Duplicate post, continue here - [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/816154]''
    firefox 4 is not compatible with the skin i had been using for my browser, old factory black... i would prefer to keep this skin rather than use firefox 4... how can i revert back to the previous version of firefox?...

    Older versions of Firefox are available here:
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

  • I'm running OS X 10.5.8 & Firefox says that my computer is not compatible with the most recent upgrade. What am I missing? Thanks!

    I'm running OS X 10.5.8 & Firefox says that my computer is not compatible with the most recent upgrade. What am I missing? Thanks!

    The last version of Firefox which is compatible with PPC architecture is Firefox 3.6.x. <br />
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    For older Macs that aren't supported in Firefox 4+ versions, try TenFourFox for PowerPC's running Mac 10.4.11 & 10.5.8 . <br />
    http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/
    http://tenfourfox.blogspot.com/

  • I have Webroot Security and Firefox is not compatible with the malicious URLs part of the program? How do I protect myself?

    When I downloaded Firefox and was checking my extensions, I was advised that Firefox is not compatible with the malware prevention part of my Webroot security package. I use it successfully with Windows and just renewed for another year. What do you suggest I do to protect myself? I am not a computer expert so if you could reply in plain language it would be appreciated. Also, we stream videos a lot and I noticed that DivX is also not compatible. What do I do about that? Thank you.

    I was having this issue for Firefox version 7 and had to spend one hour trying to find a solution. Here is the solution. Go to webroot.com, tab to support and than 2011 product support. Type in Firefox Toolbar it will than say are you unable to use firefox toolbar hit yes. It will say under 1. click hear to download patch. Save the file and after the download run it. After installed close firefox and you should have the webroot toolbar running again.
    ff7fix.exe is the file you need.

  • I bought a new imac running Loin and Office 2011. The server we use to access emails runs exchange 2003 and my IT person says the imac is not compatible with the server. The server does not want to let me access using any email software.

    I bought a new imac running Loin with Office 2011. I am the only mac in the office and the Server we use to access emails runs exchange 2003 and my IT person says the imac is not compatible with the server. The server does not want to let me access using any email software other than webmail access through our website. It looks as though 2011 is not compatible with 2003 per some searches online, but what are some options I have to gain full access again? I purchased parallels in hopes that this my help and I am able to use remote desktop connection to log on to server but can not drag and drop files I need. There is a shared drive on that Server we all use to exchange files.
    The two main issues are gaining access to my email again and ability to drag and drop files from mac to pc. I hope this is enough info to get some solutions.
    PS - IT person says my iMac's IP is what his server does not understand so that is why I can not login.

    Office 2011 is not compatbile with Exchange 2003.
    I suggest you post further Office related questions on Microsoft's own forums for their Mac software:
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac

  • I downloaded CS6 and am having issues with my print driver. It is not compatible with the HP 2600n and have tried to download drivers given to me by adobe ( (Jupiter 3) but it is not working. after a few days. Its a temporary fix and is still looking for

    I downloaded CS6 and am having issues with my print driver. It is not compatible with the HP 2600n and have tried to download drivers given to me by adobe ( (Jupiter 3) but it is not working. after a few days. Its a temporary fix and is still looking for the HP driver when i boot up. It also will not save in any print or postscript format. Does anyone know how to fix?
    Currently use a Mac with the latest Mavericks 10.9.4

        Oh boy! Acting kind of weird seems to be an understatement, aquaequus!
    What type of troubleshooting were we able to do with you? I want to make sure that we can get some sort of resolution for this problem.
    It is quite possible the battery door may get your phone in working order again. I'm not sure if the store has it in stock, but it is available in our warehouse for $14.99 which can be ordered via customer service.
    Tamara H.
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • When i try to boot itunes, screen goes black and a message pops up and says not compatible with the visual elements. how do i fix this? itunes wont even open at this point. please help. thanks :)

    When i try to boot itunes, screen goes black and a message pops up and says not compatible with the visual elements. how do i fix this? itunes wont even open at this point. please help. thanks

    Let's first try the following document, only be sure that none of the boxes in the compatibility mode tab are checked (not just the compatibility mode box itself):
    iTunes for Windows: How to turn off Compatibility Mode

  • Error :"The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client"

    Hi guys!
    I'm facing this problem:
    When my .Net application tries to access the DB, I get this error message above.
    The application is into the same machine of DB and the operational system is Windows Server Enterprise 64 bits.
    I'm comparing to another machine that has the same scenario but runs in Windows Vista 64 bits. This problem doesn't happen and I can normally access the DB.
    The both database versions are 10g Release 2 (10.2) and all components from Oracle Database Components 10.2.0.2.21 are installed as the containing bellow:
    -Oracle Data Provider for .NET 1.x 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Data Provider for .NET 2.0 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET 2003 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio 2005 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Provider for OLE DB 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Objects for OLE 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Services For Microsoft Transaction Server 10.2.0.1.0
    -Oracle Net 10.2.0.1.0
    -Oracle Universal Installer 10.2.0.2.0
    Oracle.DataAcces.DLL is 2.102.2.20 and it is reference in my .Net app (that is published and located into IIS).
    These are the Oracle assemblies installes in 'C:\Windows\Assembly':
    Windows Vista Machine:
    ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
    Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.Management.Omo 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
    Oracle.VsDevTools 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
    Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Windows Server Machine:
    ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
    Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHT 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHS 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 ko 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 jp 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    What should I check and do to solve this problems?
    Thanks for help,
    Anderson

    Hi,
    Often the error "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client" is raised when the unmanaged dll OraOpsX.dll can't be found, can't be loaded, or is the wrong version. For version 10.2.0.x of ODP.NET and .NET Framework 2.x the file should be called "OraOps10w.dll" and should be found in the %ORACLE_HOME%\bin directory.
    Since the ODAC pieces are installed on the same host as the database, are they in a separate Oracle Home or the same Oracle Home as the database software? If there are multiple Oracle Home directories, which one is in the system path first?
    I would start with verifying the version of OraOps10w.dll and the system path on the server. You might also confirm that the Oracle Home directory (and everything under it) has the following permissions for Authenticated Users:
    - Read & Execute
    - List folder contents
    - Read
    Regards,
    Mark

  • The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client

    We are running Server 2012 64 bit with multiple homes one is 32 bit and the other 64 bit. We installed the 64 bit first then the 32 bit next in order to get our Classic ASP WebSite that is using COM+ and OLEDB to see the provider.
    C:\oracle\product\12.1.0\x86
    C:\oracle\product\12.1.0\x64
    The other Websites are ASP.Net 4.0 and are running in 64 bit application pools. They are using a DAL .Net assembly built x64 with a reference to the 64 bit ODP.Net version 4.121.1.0 in C:\oracle\product\12.1.0\X64\client_1\odp.net\bin\4.
    I also see there is another folder C:\oracle\product\12.1.0\X64\odac_1\odp.net\bin\2.x with version 2.121.2.0. We are on running Framework 4.0 but when I switch to this version it works but with the version out of the bid\4 we are receiving the following error when the 64 bit Websites call the assembly:
    The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client
       Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 
    Exception Details: Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleException: The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client
    Source Error:
    Line 87: mDataSource = dataSource
    Line 88: mConnectionString = GetDBConnectionString(dataSource)
    Line 89: mConnection = New OracleConnection(mConnectionString)
    Line 90: mParams = New List(Of IDbDataParameter)
    Line 91: End Sub
    I have not been successful in getting this to work after spending endless hours, so any help would be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Oracle Client/ODP build with certified Visual C++ Libraries so application using ODP.NET requires "runtime components of Visual C++ Libraries" to be installed.
    Oracle Database Client installation includes the Visual C++ Libraries but ODAC doesn't contain these libraries which may cause such issue.
    Please check the Note 43208.1 for the particular version of Visual C++ installs with Oracle Database Client installation(e.g. 11.2.0 Database Client installs  Visual C++ .NET 2005) and also you can refer the windows event log error massage to verify which version of Visual C++ is missing.
    thanks and regards
    Venkat

  • Help!!! (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer) is not compatible with the type of control (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer)

    Post Author: mrmc
    CA Forum: General
    Hi all,
    Recently, I got problem on using cystal report on asp.net web. the error msg is:
    Parser Error Message: The base class includes the field 'viewer', but its type (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer) is not compatible with the type of control (CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer).
    in the code:
    <%@ Register TagPrefix="ce" Namespace="CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.WebControls" Assembly="CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.Web, Version=11.0.3300.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304" %>
    <CR:CrystalReportViewer id="viewer" runat="server" AutoDataBind="true" HasCrystalLogo="False" Width="350px"          Height="50px" HasToggleGroupTreeButton="False" DisplayGroupTree="False" HasGotoPageButton="False" HasRefreshButton="True"          DisplayToolbar="False"></CR:CrystalReportViewer>
    In web.config
    <add assembly="CrystalDecisions.Web, Version=11.0.3300.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=1234567890"/>
    the server contains crytal report 9 (come from .net studio) and crytal report 11 (installed standalone). 
    I googled this problem, it seems a lot of people got this problem but no solution...
    could anyone help me?  Thanks!

    Post Author: david.wilkes
    CA Forum: General
    You might try Removing the Reference and re-adding the reference. That seemed to get me pass this error, but I ran into another error that I have not figured out yet.

  • Provider is not compatible with the client

    Hi,
    I'm new to this forum so I don't know if this prob was already posted.
    It might be something that i misunderstood.
    My application VB.NET is connecting to Oracle 10g database.
    Using client from the ODAC 10.2.0.2.21 installation file.
    DB version is 10.2.0.1.0
    Even before connection is open application throws an exception:
    The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleInit.Initialize()
    Any ideas?
    Thanks for help ;O)
    Nice day to everybody.
    Renata Belakova

    Thanks
    1, I'm developing an application on Win 2003 Server with Ora10g DB 10.2.0.1.0
    2, I developed an application in VS.NET 2005, VB.NET
    3, Application works OK on develop. PC
    4, my PC name, IP and DB name are the same as customers
    5, i published application and went to install it on customers PC
    I was thinking about the same environment on developing and customer PCs.
    then i went to customer to try application on their LAN
    1, They have DB server with the same version of DB and the same name of DB and the same name of server as i got
    2, firstly I've installed ora client on customer computer not server
    I've used ODTwithODAC1020221.exe file and installed client part
    3, set up listener on clients comp
    4, installed .net application on this client comp
    5, run and got exception i wrote in previous message
    Im really not an Oracle professional. I'm a .NET developer but fist time in my life developing application under Oracle DB (mostly was using Microsoft SQL ...)
    So I don't know if these steps were OK .... but it's what i've read.
    Thanx ...

  • 'The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client' exceptio

    Hi
    I installed ODAC-11.1.0.7.10 Beta on my development system and developed a .net application which uses Oracle.DataAccess.dll to connect to Oracle10g database.
    the application is working fine, means opening connection successfully when I run it from my development system. but the same application is throwing
    'The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client' exception when I run it on my 10g database server system.
    what I need to do to run the application successfully on the machine where 10g server exists?
    any help is appreciated.
    thanks,
    harry

    Hi Harry,
    I am not sure why you installed 11.1.0.7.10 Beta as 11.1.0.7.20 has been released and you should not be using the beta at this time. That error message is because the dependencies being loaded by the process are the wrong version. When you deploy an ODP .NET application using 11.1.7.x, you need to make sure you deploy it to a machine where the 11.1.0.7.x dependencies are installed. My guess is if I read your poat correctly is that Oracle.DataAccess.dll version 11.1 is loaded but its finding 10.2 dependencies on the target deployment box.
    HTH
    Jenny

  • I just upgraded to os 10.9.5. When I try to open iPhoto, I am told that the version I have(9.3), is not compatible with the os. But it came with it when I upgraded. What do I have to do to get an iPhoto that works with 10.9.5? TIA

    I just upgraded to os 10.9.5 on my 15 " macbook pro from os 10.7.5. When I try to open iPhoto, I get the message that it is not compatible with the os. How can that be??? It came with the upgrade. It says the version of iPhoto is 9.3. How do I get an iPhoto that works with os 10.9.5? TIA

    This screenshot shows which previous versions of iPhoto are compatible with Mavericks.  It also indicates which versions qualify for a free upgradeto iPhoto 9.5.1 and which require a purchase:
    Note 1:  every day more users are reporting problems with iPhoto 8.1.2 so I've included it in the non compatible category.
    Note 2:  If your previous version of iPhoto was iPhoto 7 (08) or earlier you'll need to download and run the iPhoto Library Upgrader 1.1 application on the library before opening it with iPhoto 9.5.1

Maybe you are looking for