Firefox 4.0.1 reagiert bei fast allen Aktionen extrem langsam
Hallo,
seit ein paar Tagen reagiert mein Firefox 4.0.1 (OS WinXP, aktuell) bei fast allen Aktion (Tabwechsel, Eingaben, Googlesuche, Wechsel von anderen Programmen zu Firefox) extrem langsam, die Maus friert hierbei auch bis zu einer Sekunde ein. Ich habe recht viele Programme auf meinem PC (inkl. einiges von Adobe, Corel, Office) mit eigenen Updateroutinen, so dass ich nicht genau sagen kann, ob auch hier ein Zusammenhang besteht.
Kennt jemand dieses Verhalten und kann mir eine Lösung anbieten?
PS: Komplette Neuinstallation (inkl. aller Mozilla-Ordner) brachte keinen Erfolg!
MfG
Micha
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Abgesicherter Modus]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
* Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode
If it does work in Safe-mode then disable all extensions and then try to find which is causing it by enabling one at a time until the problem reappears.
* Use "Disable all add-ons" on the [[Safe mode]] start window to disable all extensions.
* Close and restart Firefox after each change via "File > Exit" (Mac: "Firefox > Quit"; Linux: "File > Quit")
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
Similar Messages
-
SOAP Schnittstelle bei Aufruf des Scripts extrem langsam
Hallo erst einmal - ich bin neu hier und suche eine Lösung für mein Problem bzgl. eines Indesing-Scripts über eine SOAP-Schnittstelle,
ich habe folgendes Problem. Ich habe ein Indesign-Script welches auf dem Server liegt und über eine SOAP-Schnittstelle angesteuert wird. (Von einem JAVA-Client).
Das Phänomen ist nun, dass ich vorher einen CS5 Server hatte, bei dem das alles wunderbar funktioniert hat und auch die Geschwindigkeit der Aufrufe in Ordnung war.
Jetzt habe ich aber einen CS6 Server. Die Funktionalität des Scripts ist da - also es macht das was es soll. Allerdings ist die Geschwindigkeit nicht zu tolerieren.
Das Script wird hintereinander öfter angestoßen und nach .. ich schätze .. 7 Aufrufen macht die Schnittstelle oder sonst was/wer eine Pause von exakt 10 Sekunden.
(Das Script ist eine *.jsxbin-Datei, aber das sollte nicht das Problem sein, oder?)
Vorher bindet das Script weitere jsxbin-Dateien ($.evalFile()) - entsprechend dann bei jedem Aufruf neu.
Also nochmal:
1. Script wird aufgerufen - korrekt ausgeführt
3. Script wird erneut aufgerufen - korrekt ausgeführt
6.Script wird erneut aufgerufen - korrekt ausgeführt
7. Script wird zum 7. aufgerufen - korrekt ausgeführt
--- WARTE 10 SEKUNDEN ---
8. Script wird zum 8. aufgerufen - korrekt ausgeführt
--- WARTE 10 SEKUNDEN ---
etc. (und ab dem 7. mal wie gesagt immer mit der Wartezeit).
Das geht halt schon enorm auf die Performance.
Hat jemand vielleicht eine Idee, warum das so sein kann? Gibt es irgendeine Möglichkeit soetwas einzustellen?
Ich bedanke mich schon einmal für die Hilfe und verbleibe mit Grüßen,
Tobias -
If I update to V. 6, will I lose my Fast Dial page like I did when updating to V. 5? If so, is there a quick fix to restore the Fast Dial page and all the saved bookmarks?
'''''Fast Dial''''' has a new version available for download here: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fast-dial-5721/versions/
*Users are not currently being automatically updated with this new version on users with a prior version of Fast Dial installed until the new version is fully released
Note that other Add-ons may not be compatible with Firefox 6.
*Some Extensions will never be updated by their developers for new versions of Firefox
*Google toolbar is one (Google will only produce Google toolbar for IE in the future)
**http://googletoolbarhelp.blogspot.com/2011/07/update-on-google-toolbar-for-firefox.html
**http://www.google.com/support/toolbar/bin/answer.py?answer=1342452&topic=15356%29
**Google Toolbar 8 FAQ (IE only): https://www.google.com/support/toolbar/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1111588
**Alternatives:
***http://kb.mozillazine.org/Using_Google_Toolbar_features_without_toolbars
***https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/googlebar-lite/
***https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/gbookmarks-google-bookmarks-fo/
*some security software vendors (firewall, AV/AS) have not updated their toolbars for Firefox -- check on the forums for your security software or contact them directly via phone, e-mail, chat or whatever method(s) of communication they offer to their customers.
'''If this reply solves your problem, please click "Solved It" next to this reply when <u>signed-in</u> to the forum.'''
Not related to your question, but...
You need to update some plug-ins:
*Plug-in check: https://www-trunk.stage.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/
*Shockwave Flash (Adobe Flash or Flash): [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Managing%20the%20Flash%20plugin#w_updating-flash Updating Flash in Firefox] -
I was on Sirius but before I could play music a popup told me I needed a 32 bit browser to play the plugin (at least I think that's what it said, I clicked too fast). I clicked it and Firefox restarted as 32 bit rather than 64 bit but now I'm worried that I just switched to a slower version of Firefox. Did I? Can I switch back somehow?
It sounds like you are using a program like Audio Hijack, which works only with 32-bit browsers. Running Firefox in 32-bit mode is not harmful, but it might be slightly slower than 64-bit mode.
If you don't want to run Firefox in 32-bit mode, you could try using a different browser when you run Audio Hijack, or you can disable Audio Hijack if you don't need it.
For more information, see:
http://www.rogueamoeba.com/support/knowledgebase/?showCategory=Audio+Hijack+Pro -
cannot get sound on any flash online media also video playing very fast and not buffering properly. same sites perfectly ok in chrome IE and safari
cannot get sound on any flash online media also video playing very fast and not buffering properly. same sites perfectly ok in chrome IE and safari
-
Firefox Running Slow? Make It Fast
Firefox Running Slow? Make It Fast
Perform the suggestions mentioned in the following articles:
* [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Template:clearCookiesCache/ Clear Cookies & Cache]
* [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]
Check and tell if its working.
Might not be related to your problem but some of your Plugins are out-dated:
* Update All your Firefox Plugins -> [https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/]
* '''When Downloading Plugins Update setup files, Remove Checkmark from Downloading other Optional Softwares with your Plugins (e.g. Toolbars, McAfee, Google Chrome, etc.)''' -
Firefox responds generally very slow but fast when moving the mouse
Firefox respons very slow but speeds up when I move the mouse over the page. Keeping the mouse moving results in normal speed.
?? PeterWeird thing is that if I revert back to FF15, everything works with HA enabled and full bookmark menu.
but its a no go with FF16
PEACE -
Report in Designer fast, in Viewer extremely slow
Hi.
I have a report which connects to a SQL Server backend, calling 3 stored procs which deliver the data needed for the report. However, when I execute the report in the Designer (the web app uses CR 9, but I'm testing it with CR 2008 that came with VS 2008) it takes approx. 20 seconds to return with the data - yes, the query takes rather long...
When I run our web application and call up the same report, using the same parameters and connected to the same database, the Viewer sits there for about 10 minutes before finally showing the report. I've been trying to determine the cause of this but have come up empty so far.
The report itself is a fairly simple report: headers, a parameter overview (the report uses parameterized queries), the data, and no subtotals, no subreports, no formulas.
Why is this taken so long using the Viewer? Apparently it can be fast(er) since the Designer comes within 20 secs WITH the correct data!
I've tried a couple of things to see if I could determine the cause of the bad performance, but so far I've had no luck in improving performance whatsoever. The only thing left would be redesigning the underlying stored proc, but this is a rather complex stored proc and rewriting it would be no small task.
Anybody has any idea on what to do next? Our customers are really annoyed by this (which I can understand) since they sometimes need to run this report a couple of times a day...Ludek Uher wrote:>
>
> Troubleshooting slow performance
>
> First thing to do with slow reports would be consulting the article u201COptimizing Reports for the Webu201D. The article can be downloaded from this location:
>
> https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/701c069c-271f-2b10-c780-dacbd90b2dd8
>
Interesting article. Unfortunately, trying several of the suggestions made, it didn't improve the report's performance. No noticeable difference in either Designer or Viewer.
>
> Next, determine where is the performance hit coming from? With Crystal Reports, there are at least four places in your code where slow downs may occur. These are:
>
> Report load
> Connection to the data source
> Setting of parameters
> Actual report output, be it to a viewer, export or printer
>
This part is not relevant. Loading the report isn't the problem (first query being executed under 0.5 seconds after starting the report); as I'll explain further at the end of this reply.
> A number of report design issues, report options and old runtimes may affect report performance. Possible report design issues include:
>
> u2022 OLE object inserted into a report is not where the report expects it to be. If this is the case, the report will attempt to locate the object, consuming potentially large amounts of time.
The only OLE object is a picture with the company logo. It is visible in design time though, so I guess that means it is saved with the report?
> u2022 The subreport option "Re-import when opening" is enabled (right click the subreport(s), choose format subreport, look at the subreport tab). This is a time consuming process and should be used judiciously.
The report contains no subreports.
> u2022 Specific printer is set for the report and the printer does not exist. Try the "No printer" option (File | Page setup). Also, see the following resources regarding printers and Crystal reports;
Tried that. It was set to the Microsoft XPS Document writer, but checking the 'No printer' option only made a slight difference (roughly 0.4 seconds in Designer).
> u2022 The number of subreports the report contains and in which section the subreports are located will impact report performance. Minimize the number of subreports used, or avoid using subreports if possible. Subreports are reports within a report, and if there is a subreport in a detail section, the subreport will run as many time as there are records, leading to long report processing times. Incorrect use of subreports is often the biggest factor why a report takes a long time to preview.
As stated before, the report has no subreports.
> u2022 Use of "Page N of M", or "TotalPageCount". When the special field "Page N of M" or "TotalPageCount" is used on a report, it will have to generate each page of the report before it displays the first page. This will cause the report to take more time to display the first page of the report
The report DOES use the TotalPageCount and 'Page N of M' fields. But, since the report only consists of 3 pages, of which only 2 contain database-related (read further below) I think this would not be a problem.
> u2022 Remove unused tables, unused formulas and unused running totals from the report. Even if these objects are not used in a report, the report engine will attempt to evaluate the objects, thus affecting performance.
> u2022 Suppress unnecessary report sections. Even if a report section is not used, the report engine will attempt to evaluate the section, thus affecting performance.
> u2022 If summaries are used in the report, use conditional formulas instead of running totals when ever possible.
> u2022 Whenever possible, limit records through Record selection Formula, not suppression.
> u2022 Use SQL expressions to convert fields to be used in record selection instead of using formula functions. For example, if you need to concatenate 2 fields together, instead of doing it in a formula, you can create a SQL Expression Field. It will concatenate the fields on the database server, instead of doing in Crystal Reports. SQL Expression Fields are added to the SELECT clause of the SQL Query send to the database.
> u2022 Using one command table or Stored Procedure or a Table View as the datasource can be faster if you returns only the desired data set.
> u2022 Perform grouping on the database server. This applies if you only need to return the summary to your report but not the details. It will be faster as less data will be returned to the reports.
> u2022 Local client as well as server computer processor speed. Crystal Reports generates temp files in order to process the report. The temp files are used to further filter the data when necessary, as well as to group, sort, process formulas, and so on.
All of the above points become moot if you know the structure of the report:
3 pages, no subreports, 3 stored procs used, which each return a dataset.
- Page 1 is just a summary of the parameters used for the report. This page also includes the TotalPageCount field;
- Page 2 uses 2 stored procs. The first one returns a dataset consisting of 1 row containing the headings for the columns of the data returned from stored proc 2. There will always be the same number of columns (only their heading will be different depending on the report), and the dataset is simply displayed as is.
- The data from stored proc 2 is also displayed on Page 2. The stored proc returns a matrix, always the same number of columns, which is displayed as is. All calculations, groupings, etc. are done on the SQL Server;
- Page 3 uses the third stored proc to display totals for the matrix from the previous page. This dataset too will always have the same number of columns, and all totaling is done on the database server. Just displaying the dataset as is.
That's it. All heavy processing is done on the server.
Because of the simplicity of the report I'm baffled as to why it would take so much more time when using the Viewer than from within the Designer.
> Report options that may also affect report performance:
>
> u2022 u201CVerify on First Refreshu201D option (File | Report Options). This option forces the report to verify that no structural changes were made to the database. There may be instance when this is necessary, but once again, the option should be used only if really needed. Often, disabling this option will improve report performance significantly.
> u2022 u201CVerify Stored Procedure on First Refreshu201D option (File | Report Options). Essentially the same function as above, however this option will only verify stored procedures.
Hm. Both options WERE selected, and deselecting them caused the report to run approx. 10 seconds slower (from the Designer)...
>
>
> If at all possible, use the latest runtime, be it with a custom application or the Crystal Reports Designer.
>
> u2022 The latest updates for the current versions of Crystal reports can be located on the SAP support download page:
>
> https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/bobj_download/main.htm
>
I've not done that (yet). Mainly because CR 10.5 came with VS2008, so it was easier to test to see if I can expect an improvement regarding my problem. Up till now, I see no improvement... ;-(
> u2022 Crystal Report version incompatibility with Microsoft Visual Studio .NET. For details of which version of Crystal Reports is supported in which version of VS .NET, see the following wiki:
>
> https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/CrystalReportsassemblyversionsandVisualStudio+.NET
>
>
According to that list I'm using a correct version with VS2008. I might consider upgrading it to CR 12, but I'm not sure what I would gain with that. Because I can't exactly determine the cause of the performance problems I can't tell whether upgrading would resolve the issue.
> Performance hit is on database connection / data retrieval
>
> Database fine tuning, which may include the installation of the latest Service Packs for your database must be considered. Other factors affecting data retrieval:
>
> u2022 Network traffic
> u2022 The number of records returned. If a SQL query returns a large number of records, it will take longer to format and display than if was returning a smaller data set. Ensure you only return the necessary data on the report, by creating a Record Selection Formula, or basing your report off a Stored Procedure, or a Command Object that only returns the desired data set.
The amount of network traffic is extremely minimal. Two datasets (sp 1 and 3) return only 1 row containing 13 columns. The sp 2 returns the same number of columns, and (in this clients case) a dataset of only 22 rows, mainly numeric data!
> u2022 The amount of time the database server takes to process the SQL query. Crystal Reports send the SQL query to the database, the database process it, and returns the data set to Crystal Reports.
Ah. Here we get interesting details. I have been monitoring the queries fired using SQL Profiler and found that:
- ALL queries are executed twice!
- The 'data' query (sp 2) which takes the largest amount of time is even executed 3 times.
For example, this is what SQL profiler shows (not the actual trace, but edited for clarity):
Query Start time Duration (ms)
sp 1 (headers) 11:39:31.283 13
sp 2 (data) 11:39:31.330 23953
sp 3 (totals) 11:39.55.313 1313
sp 1 (headers) 11:39:56.720 16
sp 2 (data) 11:39:56.890 24156
sp 3 (totals) 11:40:21.063 1266
sp 2 (data) 11:40:22.487 24013
Note that in this case I didn't trace the queries for the Viewer, but I have done just that last week. For sp2 the values run up to 9462 seconds!!!
> u2022 Where is the Record Selection evaluated? Ensure your Record Selection Formula can be translated to SQL, so that the data can be filter down to the server. If a selection formula can not be translated into the correct SQL, the data filtering will be done on the local client computer which in most cases will be much slower. One way to check if a formula function is being translated into a SQL is to look at u201CShow SQL Queryu201D in the CR designer (Database -> Show SQL Query). Many Crystal Reports formula functions cannot be translated into SQL because there may not be a standard SQL for it. For example, control structure like IF THEN ELSE cannot be translated into SQL. It will always be evaluated on the client computer. For more information on IF THEN ELSE statements see note number 1214385 in the notes database:
>
> https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/businessobjects-notes
>
Not applicable in this case I'm afraid. All the report does is fetch the datasets from the various stored procs and display them; no additional processing is taking place. Also, no records are selected as this is done using the parameters which are passed on to the stored procs.
> u2022 Link tables on indexed fields whenever possible. While linking on non indexed fields is possible, it is not recommended.
Although the stored procs might not be optimal, that is beside the point here. The point is that performance of a report when run from the Designer is acceptable (roughly 30 seconds for this report) but when viewing the same report from the Viewer the performance drops dramatically, into the range of 'becoming unusable'.
The report has its dataconnection set at runtime, but it is set to the same values it had at design-time (hence the same DB server). I'm running this report connected to a stand-alone SQL Server which is a copy of the production server of my client, I'm the only user of that server, meaning there are no external disturbing factors I have to deal with. And still I'm experiencing the same problems my client has.
I really need this problem solved. So far, I've not found a single thing to blame for the bad performance, except maybe that queries are executed multiple times by the CrystalReports engine. If it didn't do that, the time required to show the report would drop by approx. 60%.
...Charles... -
WiFi is Fast, But Ethernet Extremely Slow
On both my old 2008 24" iMac and my brand new 27" iMac, the Internet is extremely slow when the Ethernet cable is plugged in. When it's unplugged and I'm on WiFi, it's lightning quick.
When I'm on Ethernet, even retrieving text-only emails from Mail is painfully slow, as if I'm on dial-up. Web pages that are light on graphics take forever to load, regardless of browser. Safari, Firefox, Chrome, doesn't make a difference.
It's not all the time, sometimes it's very quick, but most of the time it's so slow it's unusable.
Some things I've tried on my own:
New Ethernet cable - no difference
Plugging into different ports on cable modem - no difference
Unplugging cable modem, waiting a couple minutes, plugging back in - no difference
Had the cable company out, they checked everything and saw nothing wrong on their end
Plugged my wife's Windows laptop into the modem - web pages load very quickly
I added a DNS address to System Preferences > Network - no difference
When I go to a website such as Speedtest.net, it routinely shows 60-70 Mb/s download (I'm paying for 60). Even if I'm on Ethernet, it may take forever to actually load the Speedtest page, but once I do and hit "Test", it comes back with at least 60 Mb/s.
System specs are as follows: Late 2013 27" iMac, 3.5 GHz Intel Core i7, 8 GM RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 4 MB graphics card, 1 TB fusion drive.
Based on everything I've tried above, I don't think it's the modem or the cable company, but something in the Mac. When I got the new computer, I transferred everything from the old via Time Machine. I'm hoping I didn't transfer some obscure setting that is preventing the Ethernet from running at its full potential...
Any suggestions would be most welcome - thank you!
- BobOn both my old 2008 24" iMac and my brand new 27" iMac, the Internet is extremely slow when the Ethernet cable is plugged in. When it's unplugged and I'm on WiFi, it's lightning quick.
When I'm on Ethernet, even retrieving text-only emails from Mail is painfully slow, as if I'm on dial-up. Web pages that are light on graphics take forever to load, regardless of browser. Safari, Firefox, Chrome, doesn't make a difference.
It's not all the time, sometimes it's very quick, but most of the time it's so slow it's unusable.
Some things I've tried on my own:
New Ethernet cable - no difference
Plugging into different ports on cable modem - no difference
Unplugging cable modem, waiting a couple minutes, plugging back in - no difference
Had the cable company out, they checked everything and saw nothing wrong on their end
Plugged my wife's Windows laptop into the modem - web pages load very quickly
I added a DNS address to System Preferences > Network - no difference
When I go to a website such as Speedtest.net, it routinely shows 60-70 Mb/s download (I'm paying for 60). Even if I'm on Ethernet, it may take forever to actually load the Speedtest page, but once I do and hit "Test", it comes back with at least 60 Mb/s.
System specs are as follows: Late 2013 27" iMac, 3.5 GHz Intel Core i7, 8 GM RAM, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 4 MB graphics card, 1 TB fusion drive.
Based on everything I've tried above, I don't think it's the modem or the cable company, but something in the Mac. When I got the new computer, I transferred everything from the old via Time Machine. I'm hoping I didn't transfer some obscure setting that is preventing the Ethernet from running at its full potential...
Any suggestions would be most welcome - thank you!
- Bob -
This last Firefox update was totally useless, all Firefox updates destroy my previous tabs without warning and are therefore extremely disruptive. I lose information that will take time to recover. Firefox should give warning to its users so that vital information can be saved before updating their tab system.+
Firefox should not lose your open tabs when it updates. <br /> (That is not to say it always succeeds)
I know Firefox will sometimes remove stored open tabs with updates, and I think Firefox 29 itself had a particular issue with the open tabs.
* Bug 1001167 - Session Restore doesn't handle a corrupted sessionstore.js file properly ('''That is fixed in the current Release Firefox 30''')
Firefox 29 and later should respect the setting to not update without warning you. So you should be able to set it to
* Bug 950357 - The About dialog automatically checks for updates (and then asks the user if he wants to update) even when the "Never check for updates" option is selected. ('''Again that is fixed in Firefox 30''')
* SEE [[Advanced settings for accessibility, browsing, system defaults, network, updates, and encryption#w_update-tab]]'''_update-tab'''
NOTE it has the option to let you choose when to upgrade.
I agree Firefox should warn before update, and it should give users an indication of what is about to change. Use input to make a comment.
* https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback
We are only volunteers and fellow Firefox users, not the people making choices and decisions.
Consider using Firefox Sync to backup your open tabs
* [[How do I set up Firefox Sync?]]
* [[How to update to the new Firefox Sync]]
Although Firefox will do nothing to warn you what features change, note that the Beta release is six weeks earlier and will give you a very good indication of what will be in the Release.
Release notes
*Fx '''29 Beta''' http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0beta/releasenotes/
*Fx 29 http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0/releasenotes/
*Fx 29.0.1 http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/
*Fx '''30 Beta''' http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/30.0beta/releasenotes/
* Fx 30 http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0/releasenotes/
* Fx 31 Beta http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/31.0beta/releasenotes/
Note the pattern in the links /nn.0/releasenotes and /nn.0'''beta'''/ -
Probleme mit Stereo über Microeingang bei der X-FI Extrem Ms
Hallo, wer kann was dazu sagen:?Karte wurde ordnungsgem? unter WIN XP SP2 installiert und funktioniert auch soweit. Wenn ich nun ?ber den Microfoneingang ein Stereosignal einschleuse wird daraus nur Mono interpretiert. Es wird zwar bei der Aufnahme des Signals ein Stereopegel angezeigt aber beide schlagen gleich aus und wenn ich eine Seite wegnehme ?ndert sich nichts daran.Kann mir jemand was dazu sagen??THX
ohne dass am System irgend etwas verändert wurde. Lediglich der Arbeitsspeicher wurde von 4 auf 8 GB aufgestockt. Dies sollte jedoch wenn überhaupt für schnellere Ladezeiten sorgen und nicht umgekehrt.
Und wenn deine Speicherbasteleien nun einfach was kaputt gemacht haben? Wenn der Speicher einfach "schlecht" ist oder mit falscher Taktrate läuft? Wenn das Betriebssystem irgendwo Infos über die Speicherbereiche gespeichert hat und nun ständig strampelt, Kompatibilität herzustellen? Nix für ungut, aber sowas soll ja schon mal vorkommen. Also mal irgendein Test-Tool drüber laufen lassen und genau die Einstellungen abklappern...
Mylenium -
Netgear faster then Airport Extreme?
I have a 10MB internet connection via a cable modem.
I plug the cable modem into my Netgear Rangemax cable router - Speedtest.net shows I am getting 9.7MB downloads - which is what I expect.
I do exactly the same test (from the same distance etc) with my AEBS, and only achieve around 2MB download?
Why is this??
I do everything the same when connecting - switch everything off, power up the modem, then power up the router, then power up my MBP. Both are at the same distance from my MBP - literally 2 feet away. Yet the Netgear gives me my full speed and the AEBS does not??
My current connection to the AE shows the following:
PHY mode: 802.11n
Channel 36 (5GHz)
Security: WPA2 Personal
RSSI: -53
Transmit Rate: 108 (sometimes this goes up to 300, even though my MBP hasnt moved?)
MCS Index: 15
Why isnt my AEBS giving me my full speed??
It is running the latest 7.4.2 update etc.Hmmmm, not sure what to make of this!
I entered Airport Utility to double check all settings etc. I didnt change a single setting - I exit the utility and didnt save anything etc.
I ran another speedtest, and as I turned around to grab an ethernet cable to test via ethernet, my speed has shot up to normal - around the 9.5MB mark download!
Im not sure what has caused this - but things seem to be Ok for the moment!!
Any ideas what could have caused this dip in speed?
Pretty sure its not my ISP as it worked fine when I plugged my Netgear back in! -
Graphite BS faster then Airport Extreme BS - Why?
I've tried 2 base stations in my home. Same room, same location, same modem, same computer. My Graphite Airport Base Station pulls a 3.3 mb download and a 1.1 mb upload. My newer Airport Extreme Base Station pulls 1.9 mb download and a 900 kb upload speed. I have no idea why. I've tried reconfiguring different settings but nothing has worked.
What am I doing wrong?
tested on iBook g3 600mhz, 640ram, running 10.4.11.The newer base stations are optimised for 802.11n. Although they are backwards compatible with 802.11a through g, performance is not as good when compared to an AEBS or AEX of the era. To get around this problem at home I run 2 wireless networks, one for n the other for everything else using respective base stations.
-
Installed Firefox 5 on desktop PC. Now, everything is extremely slow when open
Mouse movement freezes for 2-3 seconds, jumps, then freezes again. Started to act like this when I upgraded to FF 5, and it only happens when FF 5 is open. Close FF, and PC responds normally.
Try having a technician install a battery made for your device.
Using things not made for your computer (or approved by the manufacturer) is a poor way to save money.
Barry -
You may want to know that this is a desktop with a Vista operating system.
That's supposed to indicate it's your plug-ins like Flash that is the problem.
You might try changing hardware acceleration, a setting within Flash either turn if off or on.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Asset Initial Upload & reporting for uploaded value
Hi SAP Gurus, I have uploaded the asset data using AS91 and also updated the GL values in OASV. The initial upload seems to be all correct in this manner since TB is tallying. However when i view the FA reports for the date of upload i am finding dis
-
Convert SSRS dropdown MDX query to INNER JOIN w/ NONEMPTY? Having hard time with this.
I'm having an incredibly hard time with this, mostly because I'm very new with MDX. I created a simple report (with AdventureWorksDW) whose datasource is an SSAS cube. I select a datekey from the dropdown menu, and the report displays [Measures].[Ord
-
Storing and retrieving arabic in SQL Server 2000
hello, i realize this problem has been posted lots before but i read in the forum and i couldn't find a solution to fix my problem i am developing a desktop application in java and sql server 2000, and i'm using JBuilder for writing my java codes her
-
My iPod is disabled, but not because I forgot the password. It says I need to connect with iTunes, but when I try it says I need to enter the password. What do I do?
-
Login to Java Desktop fails after IP address change
If the IP address (or networking type DHCP vs. static address) changes, users can no longer log in to their accounts and use the Java Desktop environment. I can get around this by using the Solaris Management Console from CDE to remove the user(s) wi