Firefox 64 bit and flash 32 bit chroot

Since two days im trying to get 32 bit flash plugin to work with firefox 64 bit using chroot enviroment. I followed those instructions on archwiki http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ins … _in_Arch64 but theres only solution for both firefox and flash 32 bit.
Any ideas how to do this?

- Go to Flash10 x86_64.
- Download file at bottom.
- Decompress it.
- Copy ".so" file over ~/.mozilla/plugins folder.
- Restart firefox...
I suggest evryone just avoid mixing 64bits and 32bits... unless impossible (ie. wine64 doesn't run win32 apps, just win64 ones)
EDIT: Oh, about your "real" question: maybe you were looking for "ndispluginwrapper" (or something alike)
EDIT2: I forgot to mention you should read some literacy about "what is a chroot and what is its purpouse"....
Last edited by franzrogar (2010-04-11 21:19:31)

Similar Messages

Flash Builder4.6:Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions will be available.

Flash Builder4.6：Both 32-bit and 64-bit versions will be available.

Hi jeri-de,
If you are using a 64 bit computer you can install just the 64 bit program else install only the 32 bit version.

Creation of Add-on package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One Client

Please help me creating package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One. If Add-on executable is compiled with x86 option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 32 bit SAP Business one and if Add-on executable is compiled with Any CPU option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 64 bit SAP Business one. Problems are mentioned as below
1. My Add-on uses MS ACCESS connection and the connection is read using Jet OLEDB 4.0 provider. It works fine for x86 compile mode but not when compile mode is Any CPU. I searched for the issue on Google and found a solution to change MS ACCESS connection provider to ACE.OLEDB.12.0 but again ACE provider is installed according to the Office version i.e. 32 bit or 64 bit office suite. If I install 32 bit ACE provider then Add-on executable compiled with x86 version is working fine but with Any CPU option throws error as provider is not registered on current machine.
2. Secodly, our license validation activex dll is build using vb 6.0 and therefore when Add-on executable is compiled using Any CPU option, Add-on EXE cannot read from license dll. Any suggestion, how the activeX dll can be compiled whose component can be created from for X86 compiled exe and any cpu compiled exe.
Please help because we are stuck in this issue and cannot move forward.
Thanks.

Hi Alejandro,
That is one solution but did your add on used ms access connection? if you used Jet oledb to connection string or ace oledb connection string? what if 32 bit office is installed and what if 64 office is installed? how did you found the office version in install script? after determining the office version how did you installed Microsoft redistributable for ace oledb (32 bit or 64 bi )?
I am sorry that I asked many questions but these are the problems where I am stuck with the addon installer?
Thanks

What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management

What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management
Thanks
Shashikala

This is the basic difference...check if helps:
A 32-bit CPU running 32-bit software (also known as the x86 platform) is so named because it is based on an architecture that can manipulate values that are up to 32 bits in length. This means that a 32-bit memory pointer can store a value between 0 and
4,294,967,295 to reference a memory address. This equates to a maximum addressable space of 4GB on 32-bit platforms
On the other hand 64-bit limit of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616, this number is so large that in memory/storage terminology it equates to 16 exabytes. You don’t come across that term very often, so to help understand the scale, here is the value converted to
more commonly used measurements: 16 exabytes = 16,777,216 petabytes (16 million PB)➤ 17,179,869,184 terabytes (17 billion TB)➤ 17,592,186,044,416 gigabytes (17 trillion GB)➤
As you can see, it is signiﬁcantly larger than the 4GB virtual address space usable in 32-bit systems; it’s so large in fact that any hardware capable of using it all is sadly restricted to the realm of science ﬁction. Because of this, processor manufacturers
decided to only implement a 44-bit address bus, which provides a virtual address space on 64-bit systems of 16TB. This was regarded as being more than enough address space for the foreseeable future and logically it’s split into an 8TB range for user mode
and 8TB for kernel mode. Each 64-bit process running on an x64 platform will be able to address up to 8TB of VAS.
Please click the Mark as answer button and vote as helpful if this reply solves your problem

Best practice for managing a Windows 7 deployment with both 32-bit and 64-bit?

What is the best practice for creating and organizing deployment shares in MDT for a Windows 7 deployment that has mostly 32-bit computers, but a few 64-bit computers as well? Is it better to create a single deployment share for Windows 7 and include both
versions, or is it better to create two separate deployment shares? And what about 32-bit and 64-bit versions of applications?
I'm currently leaning towards creating two separate deployment shares, just so that I don't have to keep typing (x86) and (x64) for every application I import, as well as making it easier when choosing applications in the Lite Touch installation. But I know
each deployment share has the option to create both an x86 and x64 boot image, so that's why I am confused.

Supporting two task sequences is way easier than supporting two shares. Two shares means two boot media, or maintaining a method of directing the user to one or the other. Everything needs to be imported or configured twice. Not to mention doubling storage
space. MDT is designed to have multiple task sequences, why wouldn't you use them?
Supporting multiple task sequences can be a pain, but not bad once you get a system. Supporting app installs intelligently is a large part of that. We have one folder per app install, with a wrapper vbscript that handles OS detection. If there are separate
binaries, they are placed in x86 and x64 subfolders. Everything runs from one folder via the same command, "cscript install.vbs". So, import once, assign once, and forget it. Its the same install package we use for Altiris, and we'll be using a Powershell
version of it when we fully migrate to SCCM.
Others handle x86 and x64 apps separately, and use the MDT app details to select what platform the app is meant for. I've done that, but we have a template for the vbscript wrapper and its a standard process, I believe its easier. YMMV.
Once you get your apps into MDT, create bundles. Core build bundle, core deploy bundle, Laptop deploy bundle, etcetera. Now you don't have to assign twenty apps to both task sequences, just one bundle. When you replace one app in the bundle, all TS'es are
updated automatically. Its kind of the same mentality as active directory. Users, groups and resources = apps, bundles and task sequences.
If you have separate build and deploy shares in your lab, great. If not, separate your apps into build and deploy folders in your lab MDT share. Use a selection profile to upload only your deploy side to production. In fact I separate everything (except
drivers) into Build and deploy folders on my lab server. Don't mix build and deploy, and don't mix Lab/QA and production. I also keep a "Retired" folder. When I replace an app, TS, OS, etcetera, I move it to the retired folder and append "RETIRED - " to the
front of it so I can instantly spot it if it happens to show up somewhere it shouldn't.
To me, the biggest "weakness" of MDT is its flexibility. There's literally a dozen different ways to do everything, and there's no fences to keep you on the path. If you don't create some sort of organization for yourself, its very easy to get lost as things
get complicated. Tossing everything into one giant bucket will have you pulling your hair out.

Smart View 11.1.2.5 with Office 32 Bit and 64 Bit

Hello,
Does anyone know if it's possible to install Smart View 11.1.2.5.210 on MS Office 2013 32 Bit and MS Excel 2013 64 Bit on the same machine? We have users that have both Office 2013 32 Bit and Excel 2013 64 Bit installed. It seems like when we run the SmartView.exe it is looking for the full Office 2013 64 Bit suite and it won't install for just Excel 2013 64 Bit. I'm not sure if it's an issue having both 32 bit and 64 bit or if it's because we don't have the full 64 bit Office suite installed.
Thanks!

It does not look for the full Office suit.
Do you have Office 32-bit and Office 64-bit installed on the same machine?
Thanks

Bridge CS6 64-bit and 32-bit FREEZE on Launch

Now I am having problems with Bridge CS6 again. Both 64-bit and 32-bit suddenly have the behavior of freezing on launch. I get the application window open but no icons populate and I can't do anything in the interface. Not even close the application. I have to use Windows Task Manager to quit the application forcibly.
Not sure what's going on. I went to the start menu and hit Ctrl+Bridge 64-bit to give me the options to reset preferences, dump the cache, and one other option that I also checkmarked. Still no dice.
Can anyone help me out before Adobe Customer Support becomes available in 4 hours?

While searching for a set of files on my computer using traditional search in the gui i discovered that the indexing functionality of windows was turned off. I tried to turn it on and search again but kept getting the error that indexing was turned off. I went to the event viewer and saw hundreds of events related to this error. I thought by suspicion that there might be a correlation between this windows malfunction and adobe bridge not functioning properly. After finding an appropriate solution to reset the search functionality of Windows known as 1) Windows Search and also as 2) Indexing, I tried to run Bridge again and now it works just fine. So the solution to the Bridge problem was to fix Windows Search and also fix Indexing of files.

Is there any difference running W7Pro 64 bit and 32 bit for Adobe Acorbat 9 Pro Extended

My primary system runs Windows 7 Pro 64 bit system. My other system runs a 32 bit system. I would like to buy Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Extended. Is there any difference with running it on either systems? Or will one version work on both the 64 bit and 32 bit systems.

It would work on both systems, but you no longer can buy Acrobat 9...
Mylenium

Dual disk usage, 32 bit and 64 bit

Heres what I have. I bought a dual disk Windows 7. One disk is 32 bit the other 64 bit. I have the 64 bit (disk-1), on my desktop and all is well. I have a laptop with windows Vista, it's a proprietary computer, an Acer. What I want to find
out is can I install The Windows 7 -32 bit (disk-2) on my laptop, and run the 64 bit on my desktop. Is it legal to do this over top of the Vista 32 bit laptop.
Thank you,
Steve

No, it's not legal to use a single license in two different PCs at the same time. A product key is considered as a license. Even though two disk are provided, only a single product key will be provided, meaning, only one license but can be used with different
architectures.Two disks are provided for 32-bit and 64-bit architectures. These two releases can be used in a single PC only, and can even be at the same time as dual boot, but not in two different PCs.
Balaji Kundalam

Separate GPO for 32-bit and 64-bit machines?

Before I give myself a whole load of work wanted to confirm this either way...
We're imaging both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 7 this summer (x86 for app compatibility and x64 for Adobe CS6 etc). So far I've made a full working policy for x86 but now need to do x64.
When I created the initial policy on a 32-bit machine the ZCM console automatically seems to add a requirement of Architecture = 32-bit which suggests the policy can only be used on that version of the OS - do I need to create a separate x64 policy from scratch or can the x86 GPO be applied (and work consistently and be supported) on the x64 machines?

Yes unfortunately you have to create your policies with the bit version of
the OS. So you have to do it with a 32bit and 64bit machine.
"gshaw0" wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Before I give myself a whole load of work wanted to confirm this either
way...
We're imaging both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 7 this summer (x86 for app
compatibility and x64 for Adobe CS6 etc). So far I've made a full
working policy for x86 but now need to do x64.
When I created the initial policy on a 32-bit machine the ZCM console
automatically seems to add a requirement of Architecture = 32-bit which
suggests the policy can only be used on that version of the OS - do I
need to create a separate x64 policy from scratch or can the x86 GPO be
applied (and work consistently and be supported) on the x64 machines?
gshaw0
gshaw0's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=135427
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=467454

Lenovo Provides 32 bit and 64 bit versions of VISTA & 7 by recovery media for FREE BUT HOW???

Lenovo advertises this title:
When is it possible to switch between 32 bit and 64 bit versions of Microsoft Operating Systems by using recovery media?
In this page:
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/MIGR-74752.html
BUT
Doesn’t give any info that how??? I
How do I contact a Lenovo Support Centre to place an order. Link brings you to contact numbers for Lenovo and after I call them they say these numbers are for IBM and it is only for hardware support.
I am wondering got know how on earth they accept orders for this type of complex issue by phone???
Specially that I am dealing with so special situation and I need some e-mail address to describe it Lenovo and wait for the answer...
I appreciate it if somebody could help me with this...
Thanks in advance for your help guys...

Awesome dude,
Thanks for well described reply. I enjoyed it specially when I found out you don't work for Lenovo.
I am curious to know something. I could buy Windows 7 Bit for a very good price form Microsoft offers for university students that it probably cost me the same price as recovery media. Do you think it is a good idea to install a totally fresh windows 7 (NOT from the recovery media) on my t400s?
I am asking this because when you install operation system with provided recovery Media it builds another partition
with this name SERVICEV003 that is about 2 Gb and contains system files and stuff related to my laptop. I am afraid if I install windows without using recovery media but using Microsoft original DVDs then my laptop doesn't function properly?
What is your idea about this issue,
Thanks again for all your help, I appreciate it,
Cheers,
Mehrad

Printer networking issue between 32 bit and 64 bit windows 7 computers

I have a HP Officejet Pro 8500 A909G printer that I'm trying to network between 2 pcs, both on Windows 7. One is a 32 bit and the other is a 64 bit.
The printer won't stay available to both pcs. I've tried having it directly connected to the router and directly connected to one of the pcs (done with both computers). It will work initially but won't stay available to both pcs. Right now I've given up and just unplug and plug in the usb cable for whichever pc wants to be able to print, which is becoming a pain.
Help!

Hi Nallin,
Getting a printer to be shared between a 32 bit and 64 bit machine under Windows can be a little tricky. Here is a great article that explains how to do so:
http://goo.gl/fWM9d
Let me know how it goes or if you have any questions.
If I have helped in any way, just click the Kudos star on the left. Also, if your issue has been resolved, don't forget to select Accept as Solution

CUVA with Win 7 (32 Bit and 64 Bit) OS

Hi All,
Our users are facing issues with CUVA 2.1.2.0 [ CDP 2.1(0.6) ] with Windows 7 32 Bit and 64 Bit.
On Windows 7 the CDP Driver and version is visible but not on Windows 7 64 Bit.
On both the operating systems, users are not able to access the CUVA video. The status of the link between IP Phone and video is showing as disconnected.
I know of a old document on Cisco website which says its not compatible...Any alternatives?? updates??
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ifthiquar

FYI - I have installed Win 7 64-bit on a 3 year old dual core dell inspiron 6400 with 2GB of ram and it is running beautifully. So far, I have not seen any issues with 2GB of RAM. Boot up really fast. browsing seems faster, MS Office works great.
My new T400s will be next - just a bit nervous as i want to make sure that all the necessary drivers are available.

Need drivers for Photosmart D7560, and Scanjet 4370 for both Windows 7 32 bit and 64 bit

I need drivers for my Photosmart D7560 Printer and Scanjet 4370 scanner, for both Windows 7 32 bit, and 64 bit.

Hi, For the printer: http://ftp.hp.com/pub/softlib/software11/COL30216/mp-75048-1/PS_SF_04_D7500_NonNet_Full_Win_WW_130_140.exe For the scaner (no available): http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/swd/public/readIndex?sp4ts.oid=457534&swLangOid=8&swEnvOid=4063 Regards.

How to create a ARD for 64 Bit And 32 Bit Systems

Dear All,
Please help me to solve my problem. I am not able to create the ARD for both type systems (32 Bit and 64 Bit Bit). My system is OS Windows 7, 32 bit operating system. Sometimes my add-ons run successfully for 32 bit , sometimes for 64 bit. I am creating 2 ARD's for each add-on but I have failed.
I have read many threads but I got no success.
Please help me.
Regards

Hi Pedro Magueija, Edy Simon,
Thanks for your reply. I follow below mentioned steps to create the ARD File. I build my add-on code as mentioned below:
Solution Configuration
Solution Platform
Project Properties/Compile/ Advanced Compile Option/ Target CPU
Add-on Registration Data Generator x64 Option
Debug
x86
x86
FALSE (Unchecked)
Debug
x86
x86
True (Checked)
I was able to create and use ARD by doing in above mentioned way. But sometimes these ARD doesn't work or doesn't get installled.
Regards

Can i install a mix of 32-bit and 64-bit package ? and they work together ?

Customer environment is Linux x86-64 having package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_4.1.x86_64 installed as per x86-64 server and application requirement.
i.e # rpm -qi pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_4.1
Name : pam Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 0.99.6.2 Vendor: Oracle America
Release : 6.el5_4.1 Build Date: Thu 11 Mar 2010 02:58:52 AM MST
Install Date: Tue 27 Apr 2010 02:12:43 AM MST Build Host: ca-build9.us.oracle.com
Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_4.1.src.rpm
Size : 2577739 License: GPL or BSD
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Thu 11 Mar 2010 02:59:17 AM MST, Key ID 66ced3de1e5e0159
URL : http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/index.html
Summary : A security tool which provides authentication for applications
Description :
PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) is a system security tool that
allows system administrators to set authentication policy without
having to recompile programs that handle authentication.
Now customer is installing other oracle monitoring application which is looking/requesting for 32 bit version of pam-0.99.6.2.6.el5_4.1 (i386), i.e this library
Question:
So, is there any way we can install the 32 bit version of this ? While 64 bit is still there ?
Concern with installing the 32 bit library, is that something picks it up mistakenly when it expects the 64 bit version.
Edited by: sgaraga on Jun 8, 2012 4:39 PM

You can run 32-bit software under a x86-64 OS provided you install the necessary x86 (32-bit) libraries.
The x86_64 CPU is fully backwards compatible with Intel x86 16-bit and 32-bit code. Because the full x86 16-bit and 32-bit instruction sets remains implemented in hardware without any intervening emulation, existing x86 executables run with no compatibility or performance penalties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64)
An application that is 32-bit or 64-bit will have to be linked or share the appropriate library. 32-bit and 64-bit libraries won't be confused because they use different names.

Firefox 64 bit and flash 32 bit chroot

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for