Firefox 7.0.1 consumes more memory than just FF 7.0!

You have got to be kidding me, Mozilla! You claimed that Firefox 7.0 would consume less memory than its predecessors. Well, FF7.0 does consume less memory, but when I upgraded to Firefox 7.0.1 and used the browser, it now consumes MORE memory than FF7.0 did before, and it is now at nearly 300,000 KB to nearly 500,000 KB! And that was on my first use! The second or other times I used it, Firefox 7.0.1 only consumes less memory, than the first time I used the browser! Mozilla, when will you wise up and fix the memory leaks again?

That is nothing, my Firefox 7.0.1 consumes 2.47GB (2 473 805 KB to be exact) ram with just 2 open tabs...
My system is with 8GB ram and I'm running out of memory...
Most of the time when I browse, the pages load slowly, firefox freezes during scrolling (and assortment of other problems)

Similar Messages

Exchange 2013 - The Microsoft Exchange Transport service is rejecting message submissions because the service continues to consume more memory than the configured threshold

Noticed at about noon that no emails had been received all day. Began to investigate and found that the MS Exchange Transport service had been set to deny email submission because it was using too much memory on the server (91%).
The error message makes me think that we may have been getting used by malware or something similar.“The Microsoft Exchange Transport service is rejecting message submissions because the service continues to consume more memory than the
configured threshold.”
There are also several warning messages that list particular IP addresses and say that a connection from that IP was denied because there were already the maximum number of connections (20).
From what I can tell, all of the IP addresses are from Taiwan.
The time period for which some emails may be missing is from close of business yesterday ( 4/3/2014) through about 12:45 today (4/4/2014).
From the time I spent reading and trying to figure out the error, I think we may need to readjust our throttling policies to prevent this from happening.
The exchange server is currently running at 90%+ CPU and 50%+ memory usage the majority of the time, and I’m not sure how to fix it.
Also, I cannot get into EMS I get a access denied message from the destination computer. (Exchange server) I want to get into there to change the throttling policy back to default, since we disabled it.
The Error reads:
The WinRM client cannot process the request. The WinRM client tried to use Kerberos authentication mechanism, but the destination computer <Exchange> returned an 'access denied' error. Change the configuration to allow Kerberos authentication
mechanism to be used or specify one of the authentication mechanism supported by the server. (How do I do this?) To use Kerberos, specify the local computer name as the remote destination. (I'm trying to use EMS while logged into the local Exchange server)
Also verify that the client computer and the destination computer are joined to a domain. (Exchange is on our domain, and the computer trying to connect is the same computer) To use basic, specify the local computer name as the remote destination, specify
Basic authentication and provide user mane and password. Possible authentication mechanisms reported by server.
At line:1 char:1
+ New-PSSession -ConnectionURI "$connectionUri" -ConfigurationName Microsoft.Excha ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : OpenError: (System.Manageme....RemoteRunspace:RemoteRunspace) [New-PSSession], PSRemotingTransportException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : AccessDenied,PSSessionOpenFailed
I assumed control of this exchange system already in place and I do not have much experience with exchange 2013 or server 2012. I do know 2008, but that doesn't help very much in this situation.
Recent changes to the system:
About three days ago we switch our sessions policy to allow many more connections, and I believe this caused the issue. This is what I changed it to:
Made the registry DWORD (32-bit) "Maximum Allowed Sessions Per User" and modified the value to 1000. Location of registry change @ HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIS\ParametersSystem
I just changed it to 10 from the 1000. I'm hoping this solves this. So far no.
Also, I am not the best in the shell or command line interfaces. Any help would be wonderful!

Hi,
Yes, could be hardware performance issue. Try recycle the Transport process and see if the issue persists.
Thanks,
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Edge server consuming more memory

Hi
We are using flash media server 3.0.1 to do online streaming for more than 1 year. Sometime (once in 2-3 months) edge server consumes more memory. It will be utilizing more than 80% of swap memory.
I am new to flash and unable to figure out, why this is happening.
FMS is running on unix box.
Please any body help me to know why this is happening.
Thanks in advance,
Bhaskar

Hello,
8 Gb is the strict minimum for solman itself, but your OS needs also at least 2Gb and maybe your DB is running on the same host and consume few Gb also...
Thus I would say the minimum RAM should be 12 Gb (8 for solman, 2 for Db 2 for OS)
Regards
Extract from SAP Solution Manager 7.1 Sizing Guide

Web Process + Safari now hogging 50-75% more memory than Safari 5.0.5 did

Now that Apple has split Safari into two processes — Web Process (handles page loads and other traffic) and Safari (handles interface, bookmarks, history, etc) — these two processes together are using 50% to 75% more memory than Safari did before the upgrade to 5.1.
Three days ago, the most RAM I'd ever seen Safari hog (after several hours of surfing multiple tabs) was 1.1GB (still way more than it needed, once back down to 3 or 4 tabs).
Today, after surfing only an hour:
WebProcess 1.3GB
Safari 552MB
Anyone else seeing this? And anyone have ideas about limiting this memory hogging?

Well, to add a little more frustraton to this thread, a few weeks ago, when I first saw all the bugginess with this "update", I called Apple, was handed up to a higher-level tech person. He told me they were aware of all these problems, and promised me a fix would be released "ASAP". Well, a few weeks later, & of course, no fix. About a week ago, I called again, & was handed to a different higher-level guy, but this time he gave the same tired, "you should disable all your extensions & plug-ins" blah, blah, blah... And worse, he told me that he's heard nothing from users about issues with Safari!!!
Well, I then asked him if the problem really was one or some of the add-ons, why couldn't Apple just give us a list of at least some of the more popular ones that don't work. Why should ever single user have to go thru a one by one, trial & error, add one, then restart, then another, etc, since Apple could just do it, & let us know. Of course, that's never happened, so everyone has been trying anything they can, &/or resorting to using other browsers, & posting here & other places. I sure hope Apple quits stonewalling everyone, you would think they would address this, either by fixing it quickly, or at least letting everyone know they are aware of it, and that a fix will be coming, but pretending they no see, no hear nothing, and it's all in our heads, well, ...... it shucks.

How can i found which program consume more memory in server

Dear Experts,
please do needful on below issue
in my servers one server is very slow i checked in all arear
but i didnot found any issues on my servers
now i have one doubt
is their any problem in abapers coading
so i need to check how much memory it will takes for sql statments
i dont know how can i get this requirment
so please tel me how can i check sql statments which they consuming more memory in my server
Regards

Hi,
please do needful on below issue
For the same, I suppose ?
Use Transaction ST03, choose the period (day, week or month), select "Memory Use Statistics" and sort by "Average Total Memory Usage " or "Maximum Extended Memory Usage".
Check specially if some programs use Private Memory.
Regards,
Olivier

Why does Mozilla Firefox download files so much more slowly thanIE

Using Firefox 5.0 just freshly downloaded from the official mozilla.com site last week, I notice that firefox downloads most files '''''MUCH''''' more slowly than when I am using Internet Explorer 8

See this migrate iTunes library post for tips on moving an iTunes library from one computer to another.
See Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device to move your media from a device into a new library if you've failed to migrate the library.
See Backup your iTunes for Windows library with SyncToy to make sure you don't lose the content that is in your library.
If/when something goes wrong with the device you should restore it. If all the content is in your library where it should be then this should be an easy task.
tt2

How do I change the image title when it is uploaded from iphoto to iweb. At the moment the image title is /shapeimage_1.png and I would like to put in something more relevant than just shapeimage?

How do I change the image title when it is uploaded from iphoto to iweb. At the moment the image title is /shapeimage_2.png and I would like to put in something more relevant than just shapeimage_2?

When you drag images from iPhoto to iWeb, iWeb retains the original filename.
When you use a mask, iWeb creates a png file with the shapeimage name.
So do not use a mask and crop your images before dropping them on the iWeb canvas.
When you use an irregularly shaped mask, then png files are created. They have to be png because of the transparency of the shape.
You can use a 3rd party application to create the png images yourself, and give them a proper name.
Or use the published png files, rename them and drop them back onto the iWeb canvas, while first removing the previous images.

"Last Month" in RECENT shows a lot more photos than just last month's photo

For some reason when I select "Last Month" in RECENT (on the left) I get a lot more photos than just last month, it seems like just about all the photos from the current year!
Any one else running into this problem?
By the way, my library was originally created using iPhoto '07 and I upgraded when iLife '08 came out.

Indeed that is the case but it sounds to me like a bug and not a feature.
I agree - but since this is just a user forum that is all I can do
report to Apple -- iphoto menu ==> Provide iPhoto feedback - they can change it
Larry Nebel

Why is firefox 7b using a lot more memory and cpu on my computer?

I'm trying firefox 7 beta in a debian squeeze box. It is using a lot of RAM and CPU compared to previous releases of firefox(I've tried disabling all plugins and add-ons, not a big improvement). In the follow link here is a summary from about:memory, websites tabs opened at that time and the usage of % mem and cpu of my system: http://pastebin.com/8ji1gmLk
I'm using firefox on all my computers for a while now. So changing the browser is not an option for me now.
It did crash few times when loading a lot of tabs. Please let me know if there is another information that would be useful for fixing this. Thanks

Is it using a significant amount more resources than 6.0 did?
I noticed 6.0 is a VAST resource hog over 5.0 and earlier. It's a very bad flaw in the new version, and has a lot of people upset.
What has me curious is whether this is a new resource problem or whether it was present in 6.0 and you are just not noticing it.
One suggestion: Don't run BETA versions of ANY software on "all your machines". Not when rolling back the version is not an option. That's generally a bad idea, since beta versions are likely to have bugs.
With FF, now, I would never let it automatically update. I don't trust their new update policies, so I would suggest you turn "auto updates" to OFF, and do it manually, only after you hear the new release is stable, which we know 6.0 is NOT.

Oracle 11G consuming more memory

Dear experts,
I have upgraded oracle 10 to 11 as one of my project.
After upgrading the 11G is consuming more OS level resources. almost 15GB ram whith out any load.
I would like to know what is the minimal usage of 11G at os level.
thanks in advance.
Regards,
shiva P

For a old version of BW system with Oracle 11G, not sure how much your system is loaded.
However, you can always try to optimize resource available. If your memory is less, you need to add swap space and monitor it's usage.
Check for BW specific parameters.
1431798 - Oracle 11.2.0: Database Parameter Settings
180605 - Oracle database parameter settings for BW
1013912 - FAQ: Oracle BW performance
Divyanshu

FBL3N consumes more memory

Hi all,
When i run FBL3N, it consumes more and more memory(~6 GB) on server. I think that there is a problem. I apply OSS note 194842, but problem was not solved. How can i achieve this problem?
Best regards,
Munur

Hi Munur,
I just did a search and came across your message, did you ever find a solution to your problem ?
We are experiencing a similar problem in our system running ECC6.0 I have seen users using in excess of 6.5GB of memory with transaction FBL3N in a single session! Surely this is not normal ?
We are currently on ERP6.0 SPS10 soon to be update to SPS13 which I'm hoping may "fix" the issue.
Anybody have any ideas ?
Regards,
Nelis

Apple pro res 422 file consuming more space than usual

hi everyone!
I've been working with FCP 7 since 2008 and at the same time I started working with Canon T2 from 2 years ago and I haven't had any problems with my FCP workflow files, editing and output used to be H. 264 based files until I started to have problems with my hd DSRL projects. Recently when editing the audio went out of sync and I was suggested to change the Quicktime video settings from FCP 7 to imovie (which is th application I commonly use to create chapters and share to iDVD) this worked perfectly. It was the first time I which I had to change the Quictime Settings to Apple Pro Res 422 The Out of sync problem was resolved but the space consumed by the file was enourmosly ncreased instead. ie. A 5 min project usually would take like a 500 mbs quicktime file and now using the Apple Pro Res 422 this 5 min project went up to 5.3 Ggs!! And also the exporting process is taking forever!! For instance I'm working with a 30 min project and the Quicktime conversion never ends. It's taking about 12 hrs and is not taking more than the 20% of the process. Is there something I'm doing wrong? I need help in a extremely urgent way! Thank you all guys! And best regards from Mexico!!
Mac Pro early 2008
Processor 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Memory 10 GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
Graphics ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256 MB
Software OS X 10.8.4 (12E55)

>using the Apple Pro Res 422 this 5 min project went up to 5.3 Ggs
That's about right for a ProRes 422 file. High quality video takes a lot of space. It's sufficient to use the lighter ProRes LT for the footage from your T2 by the way. Your MacPro can also have up to 4 hard drives for plenty of storage.
Why are you using QuickTime Conversion?
Exporting to QuickTime with current settings and self contained is the better way. Then you use Compressor to make your delivery format from that master. Compressor is faster because it can take advantage of multiple cores - FCP doesn't. It will also give you far more control and choice over the encoding.

WHy does Plug-in -contianter use 1-1/ times more memory than FF itself

So rather than help me fix my problems with 3.6 which was working fine except for a little thing I moved ups to 11.2 because it was suppose to be so much better. Well now Plug-in -container is using nearly 1/2 gig of memory and climbing. FF is using300K. I'm not a gamer. Best i do is YouTube.
So can i disable the plug in and somebody remind me how i did that in 3.6. You go into :about:config" right. Then What :)

Basically "plugin-container" is nothing more than a place for plugins such as Flash, quicktime, etc. to sit. That way if they crash, instead of bringing down the Firefox window, just the plugin crashes. So, if you get high memory usage in the plugin-container, it is the fault of those plugins. You could disable the process, but that would just make the Firefox.exe process use that much more RAM.
What you can try doing is this:
Alot of things nowadays are hardware accelerated, which means they try to use your graphics card to help speed things up. Try updating your graphics driver (Firefox uses your graphics card for some rendering, and an out of date graphics card driver can cause problems. [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-do-i-upgrade-my-graphics-drivers https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-do-i-upgrade-my-graphics-drivers].
Also, some extensions can cause problems with memory usage as well. Type "About:addons" (without the quotes) in the address bar. Disable your extensions one by one, restarting Firefox between each one, until you find the trouble maker. Once you do, you can disable that add-on.

Solaris is using more memory than other node

Hi, experts
I running Oracle RAC , with 6 instances per node in Oracle RAC 10.2.0.3.0 Solaris 5.10 x86-64 32 Gb RAM and 4 processors core 2 dual
Each instance is configured with
dbprd1 = 2.5 gb
dbprd2 = 2.5 gb
dbprd3 = 2.5 gb
dbprd4 = 1.5 gb
dbprep1 = 500
dbprep2 = 500
TOTAL = 10G
But, when I use the top command, I get the follow
[oracle@oraoltppub01:backup]$ top | grep "Memory"
Memory: 32G phys mem, 14G free mem, 68G swap, 68G free swap
[oracle@oraoltppub02:dbprd4]$ top | grep "Memory"
Memory: 32G phys mem, 1334M free mem, 68G total swap, 68G free swap
On server oraoltppub01 I have 14Gb free of memory, but on server oraoltppu02 I have 1334Mb free of memory
Why is happening ?
The follow parameters is setting for both servers.
* Parmetros para o banco de dados ORACLE ###
* IPC shared memory
set noexec_user_stack=1
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=25769803776
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=256
set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=2000
* IPC semaphores
set semsys:seminfo_semmap=256
set semsys:seminfo_semmni=4096
set semsys:seminfo_semmns=4096
set semsys:seminfo_semmnu=4096
set semsys:seminfo_semume=64
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=256
set semsys:seminfo_semopm=100
set semsys:seminfo_semvmx=32767
set semsys:seminfo_semaem=16384
* IPC message
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmap=2048
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmax=8192
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=16384
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmni=50
set msgsys:msginfo_msgssz=32
set msgsys:msginfo_msgtql=2048
set msgsys:msginfo_msgseg=32767
#set noexec_user_stack=1
#set udp:xmit_hiwat=65536
#set udp:udp_recv_hiwat=65536
#set udp:xmit_hiwat=65536
#set udp:udp_recv_hiwat=65536
Do I need to do some kernel configuration?

Memory is not fixed for Oracle. You do not assign x GB of RAM to Oracle and the database will only use that much and no more.
The Oracle database engine consists of a number of processes. Each of these need a data segment. Each data segment (private process memory) can grow and shrink. And these data segments do not form part of the x GB of RAM that was assigned to Oracle's SGA (shared memory).
The number of these processes differ from instance to instance. There are management processes that Oracle will run from time to time. There is a job processing pool, a shared server processing pool and a parallel query processing pool. These can also grow and shrink. And on an instance running several jobs (and one that uses PQ processing), there will be more running processes than on another instances. Thus more private process memory will be used and less free server memory will be available on that server.
A single dedicated server process (created by the Listener to service a client connection) can also consume all available server memory - by running poorly designed and written PL/SQL bulk processing code that results in the private process memory of that dedicated process to continually grow. Hopefully this is not the case - but the fact is that a single server process can consume all available free server memory and more.
As the number of processes differ from RAC instance to RAC instance, it is the norm to see different amounts of memory utilisation on RAC nodes. Memory utilisation depends on the processing that RAC instance is currently doing.

Why acrobat 9 pro take 6 time more memory than acrobat 8 pro ?

I have tested acrobat 9 pro on a web capture pages (local files) and did the same with acrobat 8 pro.
At start acrobat 9 use 260 ko ram instead of 43 ko for acrobat 8.
the capture could never end with acrobat 9 because it eat more than 1 600 ko ram and i have an error : not enough memory.
acrobat 8 could finish the job with 400 ko memory used.
The configuration of the 2 captures are the same.
The result of the capture is different : acrobat 8 add lot of pages return after images.
Could i optimize ram use in acrobat 9 ?

Good day,
I'd like to confirm a few things:
What action/activity are you performing in Acrobat when it crashes?
Is the crash consistent at the same point?
You stated in the subject '..after upgrading to 10.6.7'
What OS was on your iMac when you purchased it?
Was this problem occuring when using an earlier verion of 10.6.x?
Have you applied to font update Apple released to address some of the problems they introduced with 10.6.7?
Did you perform a clean install of Acrobat on your iMac after you purchased it or was the application transferred in some way?
I hope we can get this resolved for you!
Regards,
David
Acrobat Community Manager
Adobe Systems

Firefox 7.0.1 consumes more memory than just FF 7.0!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for