Firefox cannot find flashplayer that I installed after upgrade to Firefox 11. On a OpenSolaris 11 machine. I did move libplayer.so to /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and bounced firefox... but plugin not found.

Firefox cannot find flashplayer plugin that I installed after upgrade to Firefox 11. I am running OpenSolaris 11 64 bit. I did move libplayer.so to /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and bounced firefox... but plugin not found.

Similar Messages

I installed firefox4.0.1 it crashes on startup safe-mode error /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /home/firefox/firefox/libxul.so)

I am using 2.6.23.1-42.fc8

That is this bug:
*[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621704 Bug 621704] - Lib dep problem: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by .../libxul.so)
*[/questions/811309]
*[/questions/777306]

[SOLVED] /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found

I got fed up typing the password every time I push some files to a server with scp, as I do it a lot with this project. Public/private key pair is not really an option (read: I do not want to send anything else but the web app files to the server) as the host is not my own, nor it is my client's. Instead it is my client's client's host.
So I installed filezilla. And got this:
> filezilla
filezilla: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found (required by filezilla)
I did a quick pacman -Syu as always, and the error still comes up.
> strings /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBCXX
GLIBCXX_3.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.1
GLIBCXX_3.4.2
GLIBCXX_3.4.3
GLIBCXX_3.4.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.5
GLIBCXX_3.4.6
GLIBCXX_3.4.7
GLIBCXX_3.4.8
GLIBCXX_3.4.9
GLIBCXX_3.4.10
GLIBCXX_3.4.11
GLIBCXX_3.4.12
GLIBCXX_3.4.13
GLIBCXX_3.4.14
GLIBCXX_3.4.15
GLIBCXX_3.4.16
GLIBCXX_3.4.17
GLIBCXX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH
Now what?
Perhaps some alternatives? What's your favorite GUI FTP client? Mine's WinSCP, but it's only for windows AFAIK.
I have used gFTP in the past, but the gui design is just horrible. For example ctrl+v is some key binding to do something else than paste from clipboard. And then there is no drag&drop. It also crashes if I open more than one file to edit at the same time. All these little details drive me nuts with gFTP.
Last edited by Lazzu (2013-10-14 16:23:23)

~ > pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 is owned by gcc-libs 4.8.1-3
~ > strings /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBCXX
GLIBCXX_3.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.1
GLIBCXX_3.4.2
GLIBCXX_3.4.3
GLIBCXX_3.4.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.5
GLIBCXX_3.4.6
GLIBCXX_3.4.7
GLIBCXX_3.4.8
GLIBCXX_3.4.9
GLIBCXX_3.4.10
GLIBCXX_3.4.11
GLIBCXX_3.4.12
GLIBCXX_3.4.13
GLIBCXX_3.4.14
GLIBCXX_3.4.15
GLIBCXX_3.4.16
GLIBCXX_3.4.17
GLIBCXX_3.4.18
GLIBCXX_3.4.19
GLIBCXX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH
Is your system fully up to date?

/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found

I am trying to run the firefox from firefox-4.0.tar.bz2 on CentOS 5.6 and get the error message,
./firefox-bin: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by firefox/libxul.so)
Firefox does not start.
I thought having a copy of the library in the local directory would help, so I made a link:
ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8 libstdc++.so.6
then I got the error message,
./firefox-bin: /firefox/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by firefox/libxul.so)
My version of glibc is:
$ rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2
glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2

Yes, that led to my solution. There was a lot of noise in the two links, but some solid signal. Ths solution came from dietux's reference in /questions/777306 Bug 621704 to http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2075033 :
1. Download the Fedora 9 package of libstdc++-4.3.0-8.i386.rpm from http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/releases/9/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/libstdc++-4.3.0-8.i386.rpm .
2. Unpack the package in your Firefox 4 directory with relative paths (does not require super user permissions):
[firefox]$ rpm2cpio libstdc++-4.3.0-8.i386.rpm | cpio -i --make-directories
3. Move the library and its link to the Firefox 4 directory:
[firefox]$ mv usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6* .
[NOTE: this is a RELATIVE path -- it has no leading slash.]
4. Run Firefox 4:
./firefox
Thank you for your help!
Craig
P.S. I do agree with the posters in [[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621704| Bug 621704]] that CentOS 5.x is NOT obsolete. The whole point of CentOS (and RHEL) is that it will be around for awhile. I left Fedora for CentOS because it changed too much.

I cannot find my 'recently bookmarked' tab after upgrading to firefox 3.6.7, can anyone help?

I've recently upgraded to firefox 3.6.7 and I now find that the 'recently bookmarked' tab in the bookmarks menu has disappeared. Does anyone know how to restore it because I find this a very useful feature. It was next to the 'recent tags' button that I never use.

All your data such as bookmarks, passwords etc., is contained in a folder called a "Profile". See: [[Profiles]]
You can recover your data from the old one if it's still intact and move it to the new profile. This article explains how to go about it: [[Managing Profiles]]

Cannot find daqmx control task.vi after upgrading computer, OS and LabVIEW

Hello,
I have recently upgraded both my computer, OS and my LabVIEW version and I am having some issues.
My old system was:
LabVIEW 8.6 Professional Development System running on Windows XP SP3 (Dell Desktop computer)
My new system is:
LabVIEW 2014 SP1 Professional Development System running on Windows 8.1 Pro (MS Surface Pro computer)
I did a clean install of the LV 2014 which went smoothly. I then copied my old projects from the old machine to the new.
The simpler projects load without problem.
Some of the bigger project begin loading but hang on "Find the VI Named "DAQmx Control Task.vi" which does not seems to exist on the new computer.
There are several other DAQmx VIs that the project loader wants and do not appear to exist on the computer also.
I'm guess this could be because of the new OS, new LabView version, or because the new PC is a "tablet", or some combination of those?
Any ideas?
adTHANKSvance,
Bob

Hi bob,
when the old PC could load these VIs without complaining abut missing DAQmx functions it had DAQmx installed. Point.
Start the DeviceDriver DVD and install DAQmx.
Hint: Whenever you want to replicate your LabVIEW installation on a different computer you should check the "Software" section in MAX. It will list all needed parts/toolkits/drivers you have installed!

I have uninstalled Lightroom and need to re-install it on the same computer. I cannot find where to re-install it. The CC popup window says that it is installed and Up to date.

I have uninstalled Lightroom and need to re-install it on the same computer. I cannot find where to re-install it. The CC popup window says that it is installed and Up to date.

CC desktop lists applications as "Up to Date" when not installed
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/aam-lists-removed-apps-date.html

I have an old MAC using OS 10.5 (does not have Intel processor). I need a new printer, but i cannot find one that will work with such an old operating system. Is there a new printer that will work with this old system?

I have an old IMAC using 10.5, and it cannot use any newer operating system. I need a new printer, but I cannot find one that is compatible with this old system.
Is there a new printer out there that will work with 10.5?
Thanks,
Niles Stroh

Canon Pixma iP4950 works great with my PPC G5 iMac on Leopard. Maybe other of their models do as well.

I am using opensuse 11.3, I download and execute firefox from sh file. But it cannot find libflashplayer.so. All my other browsers have flash player (usr/lib/browser-plugins/libflashplayer.so). But firefox cannot see that file. What must I do?

That's all no much details.

Try to place a symlink to the Flash plugin in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
See also:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Determining_plugin_directory_on_Linux

Installation error: Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at path C:\Program Fi

I am installing latest version of SQL Developer, Release 1.2. I have Sun Java 2 Standard Edition Version 1.5.0 (build 1.5.0_10-b03). When I browse and select the java.exe found it comes up with error: Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at patch
C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_10
I am installing the version I downloaded for Windows systems with JDK1.5.
I have tried on two different machines.
Any ideas?

This is going to seem loooong, but comprehensive.
I'd initially always suggest using the bundled
package, since that's supposed to be a tested and
proven combination.You know what, I'm gonna be mighty surprised if you're implying that Oracle hasn't 'tested and proven' the releases at http://www.oracle.com./technology/software/products/sql/index.html other than the first 77 MB download labeled Oracle SQL Developer for Windows... :)
After having problems with a graphics card for
example, installing the latest JDK might be
indicated.Huh?!? Not a clue what you're talkin' 'bout! :S
It's also easy for users who don't know which Java
version to download, or even where to find it! You
guys have proven that: although it's stated you need
.First of all, it says right there on the download page (http://www.oracle.com./technology/software/products/sql/index.html) that:
"JDK 1.5 (JDK 5.0) is required. This is the minimum JDK version required"
And we've "proven that [..] although it's stated you need the JDK, [we]'ve tried running with the JRE" and have NOT been able to run the application. It just presents the user a dialog box to locate the 'SDK' manually and exits gracefully if you try to dismiss it. So, conclusively proven, the JDK (or as SQL Developer puts it, Java SDK) is required- QED.
And given users might have several versions running
on the same machine (I have half a dozen), sqldev
could easily pick up a wrong version.And every JRE installation (atleast all of Sun's) make sure they update the default (via PATH and other required system variables) JRE point to the latest one installed. So if you have anything 1.5+ you're good to go; if not, you've got an incompatile JRE. Doesn't sound that hard to me!
As for being bulky, even without the bundled JDK, it
still is.Ya missed the point. Developers are making Java applications bulkier by including the JRE/JDK with their distributions. A SQL Developer release sans JDK is about 46 MB; with JDK that climbs to 77 MB (sizes quoted from download page linked above).
Imagine what happens when you have, besides SQL Developer (JDK 1.5 included), some-cool-java-app that also includes the JRE/JDK it was built on; and then another-java-app that also includes a JRE/JDK... I bet JDeveloper also comes with a JDK bundled in. So, now you have FOUR copies of JRE/JDK (aside from the "have half a dozen" that probably installed themselves via Java Update Checker)!
Here's the big picture, the savings in disk space would only be the beginning of your benefits. Here's a few others:
- Class Data Sharing (http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/vm/class-data-sharing.html) introduced in Java SE 5.0 provides for storing definitions of commonly used classes in a representation closer to machine code, even closer than bytecode, this reducing load and startup time. Plus all VM's launced using that particular distribution get to share the cache- Performace+ !!
Running each app offa' it's own VM just causes multiple caches to be loaded. You just multiplied your losses! :(
- Sun is currently working on a way to have applications simply inject into a running JVM. That way, there is no load and startup time for the JVM, just the time to load you app classes. Using different distros would completely defeat this!
(The reason why this feature isn't out yet is because they're still trying to make it possible to specify hitherto VM configurations like security and logging as application configurations. Then there's also the issue of setting up class loading boundaries between applications.
You say you don't have to bring over the VB runtime
for each app? I remember in the 90's doing it all the
time. Of course, being MS, now that's not necessary
anymore, since it's "magical" Windows. I don't have
any machine from Sun, but for sure they've got Java
bundled with it, right?I don't believe you had to do that since VB 5; and that's because MS realized that they messed up on this very point upto then! Sun worked the simple solution to that into their deployment strategy- install only ONE runtime and run all apps off that. As for you're half-a-dozen, I think you can safely uninstall the five older versions; because, even today, people are running apps developed using JDK1.1 on Java SE 6.0!
Again, I find the most logical difference between JRE
and JDK being the debugger. As you say it yourself:
JRE for end-users, who don't need to do any
debugging.
Now, sqldev is not just a table browser, but also for
debugging PL/SQL. 1 + 1 = 2.I think it's a little naive to differentiate between the JRE and JDK on just the debugger! Aside from the obvious inclusion of a compiler, the JDK has several other tools for monitoring/managing the heap, threads and logging on the fly. There's also the Doclet API and Sun's javadoc implementation, dev interfaces for instrumenting the VM, native interfaces, ...
And I reiterate, we're talkin' PL/SQL developers here. Why would I want to give a PL/SQL developer a Java Development Kit?!? ;|
Nevertheless, as said in the other thread, if the
team discloses how to circumvent the SDK check at
startup, you can go ahead and use the JRE. In any
case, you'd have to agree that won't work as
out-of-the-box solution...You're right, it won't work like a standard Windows OOTB app. But, it WILL work as a Java OOTB that only mandates that there be a JRE available; just like the scores of Java apps out there- from tiny little Pong clones to large IDE's like NetBeans.
BTW, don't even think about quoting Websphere/Rational/Eclipse as counter-arguments. They are the biggest offenders as far as this issue goes. And jikes is an abomination, a curse Sun must carry as a result to opening the VM Spec. But, I digress...

When SDDM x64 says "Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at ..." what is it actually looking for?

First of all,please forgive me if this question has been answered before, but search facilities in this new forum are even more rubbish than the old one, which is an achievement I wouldn't have thought possible.
Anyhoo.
I have downloaded the 64-bit version of Data Modeller, which comes without the JRE.
I have installed JDK1.3.0.21. I have subsequently also downloaded and installed JRE 1.7u21. However when I run datamodellerx64.exe for the first time it hurls with this message: "Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_21\bin". It also doesn't like C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin (under the JDK install) or .C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\bin (the JRE install)
So what path does it actually want?
I suppose I could download and install the 32-bit version with the inbuilt JRE but that would be a pretty sorry workaround.
Cheers, APC
Message was edited by: APC - just realised I had typed "with the JRE" instead of "without", which is actually the entire source of the issue. Doh!

The first time you start up Data Modeler, it should prompt for the Java home. You should select the java.exe file within the jre\bin folder of a Java JDK.
Thanks! This was the bit which was confusing me. What I needed was C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_21\jre\bin\java.exe
Of course, then I get a message telling me that versions above 1.6 are not certified, but I'm not installing a monstrous rootkit on my new laptop simply to run SDDM, so I guess I'll just rub along without the certification. It seems to start up just fine.
Cheers, APC

Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at path C:\Program Files\Java\jre6

Hi,
I am trying to install the latest version of SQL Developer 3.0 on my brand new Windows7(64-bit) computer. I already installed the Java SDK6 (Update26). Unfortunatelly I am forcing some problems.
When I start the sqldeveloper.exe for installing - at the beginning when I browse and select the java.exe an error comes up:
Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at path C:\Program Files\Java\jre6
Why isn't it working?
Can you help me? Any ideas?
Thanks a lot!

That's because you are trying to run SQLDeveloper with a JRE not a JDK.
Since you already installed a JDK you should have a folder labeled
jdk1.6.0_26in your C:\Program Files\Java directory.
If you cant find the proper JDK in your system the 64 bit version for windows can be found here:
http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/6u26-b03/jdk-6u26-windows-x64.exe

Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at path...

I posted this in the SQL-Deveolper forum, but perhaps it is better posted here, since it is a Java issue.
I found a thread for this same problem from 2007, but did not find an answer for it.
I'm installing sql-developer on a Windows7 machine 64bit. When I go to run the exe, I get the popup:
"Cannot find a J2SE SDK installed at path: C:\Program Files\Java\jre7."I've downloaded and installed a couple of jdk's to fix this:
jdk-6u37-windows-x64.exe
jdk-7u9-windows-x64.exe
These did not work.
Can anyone tell me what I need to download to get this to work and where I can find it?
Thanks,

I realized we have another wiindows machine that runs sql-developer just fine. I copied the jdk-6u25-windows-x64.exe from that machine and installed on the newer one. The install complained that a new version of java was already installed. But, the older version works where the newer one did not - does not.
So I'm good. But it would be nice to know why the new versions do not include all the foo that seems to make sql-developer work.

Safari, chrome and firefox cannot verify identity of secure websites after upgrading to 10.7.4, apple engineers have tried multiple things including operating system with no success

safari, chrome and firefox cannot verify identity of secure websites after upgrading to 10.7.4, apple engineers have tried multiple things including operating system with no success

There are several threads about this problem, most notably one called 'Invalid Certificates' is over 4 pages long. Many of us have experienced difficulty connecting to banking and other secure sites. On my Macbook Pro, I cannot get to my banking site with any browser, however I can get there on my iMac using Safari, but get the 'Invalid Certificate' notice with FF and Chrome. The problem started after the installation of 10.7.4. I have sent a message to Apple--they will be dismayed to hear that I cannot complete an order at their online store!

Have upgraded to 6.0.2 on my MacBook and get error message "Server Not Found" everytime i use Firefox; however, if i then click on my Gmail or other sites from bookmark toolbar it connects. means an extra step and that never happened before

when i first click on Firefox the URL: www.27yhbnhy6tfgvrbcfre3.com shows up and the error message "Server not Found". but i can connect to any website by just clicking on a bookmark from the toolbar (or typing in a url). this never happened with previous versions of Firefox

A possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
Remove all rules for Firefox from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
See:
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Server+not+found
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Firewalls
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode

Firefox cannot find flashplayer that I installed after upgrade to Firefox 11. On a OpenSolaris 11 machine. I did move libplayer.so to /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and bounced firefox... but plugin not found.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for