Firefox is taking more than 10 mins or never loads home page on mac Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D573). Pls advise thanks

Firefox never loads home page... on Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D573)
or The connection has timed out
I have no problem with Safari or IE. They are damn fast-instant! Thanks!
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== Few months back ==
== User Agent ==
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.22.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Safari/531.22.7

I encountered the same type of problem. Firefox running terribly slowly and slowing down my entire machine (Core i5 with 256GB SSD). Searching the forums, I found a couple of things about troubleshooting performance issues, one of which was to use '''hardware acceleration''', that is on by default. It was turned on on my PC, '''so I tried deactivating it, and it worked!'''
So doing the exact opposite as Mozilla support said solved the problem. It is really a pain now to work with Firefox. I'm using it because I have no choice, but I'd recommend IE and Chrome over Firefox... Whatever, the market will decide once Firefox has become to crappy...

Similar Messages

Taking more than 2 min T-SQL

Hi Friends,
SELECT
DATEPART(YEAR, SaleDate) AS [PrevYear],
DATENAME(MONTH, SaleDate) AS [PrevMonth],
SaleDate as SaleDate,
Sum(Amount) as PrevAmount
FROM TableA A
WHERE SaleDate >= DATEADD(yy, DATEDIFF(yy, 0, GETDATE()) - 1, 0)
AND SaleDate <= DATEADD(dd, -1, DATEADD(yy, DATEDIFF(yy, 0, GETDATE()), 0))
-----'2013-12-31 00:00:00.000'
GROUP BY
SaleDate
This Query taking more than 2 min to pull the results .... basically I was passing last year first date and last date (should derive based on getdate())
if I pass static values like this WHERE SaleDate >= ''2013-01-01 00:00:00.000''
AND SaleDate <= '2013-12-31 00:00:00.000'
then it is pulling results in fraction of seconds.....
Note: I was keeping this code in View I have to use only View ( I know we can write store procedure for this but I dont want sp I need only View)
any idea please how to improve my view performance?
Thanks,
RK

Do you have an index on SaleDate column ? If so , is this NCI or CI? How much data does it return? Can you show an execution plan of the query?
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

While using Status for Object button it is taking more than 15 mins to open

Hi Gurus,
We are trying to attach documents to ZBOS & OR types sales documents , while opening the Status for Object button of the sales order it is taking more than 15 mins to open , once it is opened it is working as normal.
can you please let us know is it the system functionality because of which it is taking so much time to open or the problem is with something else.
please let us also know whether it is system impacting process.
We are using 4.6C.
Thank You,
Boyeni.

Hi Syed ,
Greetings!!!...
Thank you very much for your Swift response!.
could you be so kind to let me know The Program that needs to be refreshed.
Thank You once again for your Assistance.
Boyeni.

Problems with failover which is taking more than 5 min

Hi,
I'm new to Weblogic world and facing some problems in failover.
I have plugin configuration as below.
In the httpd.conf file
# Configure Performance settings
Timeout 45
ListenBacklog 1000
KeepAlive On
MaxKeepAliveRequests 0
KeepAliveTimeout 15
<IfModule mpm_winnt.c>
ThreadLimit 500
ServerLimit 6
StartServers 2
MaxClients 3000
MinSpareThreads 500
MaxSpareThreads 3000
ThreadsPerChild 500
MaxRequestsPerChild 0
</IfModule>
# EnableMMAP off
# EnableSendfile off
# Configure DoS Settings
# Max Body size in HTTP Request of 100Mb
# Max HTTP headers set to 50
# Max HTTP header size to 8Kb
LimitRequestLine 8190
LimitRequestFields 50
LimitRequestFieldSize 8096
LimitRequestBody 104857600
RLimitCPU 300 300
RLimitMem 8192000 8192000
#RLimitNPROC 20 20
# EnableMMAP off
# EnableSendfile off
this Configuration is in Weblogic plugin as we have seperate the configuration and included this in the httpd.conf
<IfModule mod_weblogic.c>
WebLogicCluster ********************************
KeepAliveEnabled ON
KeepAliveSecs 30
CookieName PSJSESSION_ID
DebugConfigInfo ON
WLIOTimeoutSecs 4000
# Debug ALL
# WLLogFile /u01/PWCapache/logs/staging-orbit-emea.pwcinternal.com/wlproxy_http.log
</IfModule>
Asuming 01 & 02
We stopped one side of the weblogic server(01) and tried the failovering, requests are going to the 02 side absolutely fine but still the plugin is sending the requests to the 01 side and its taking more than 5 min to route to available (02 which is up).
My thoughts are to reduce the WLIOTimeoutSecs 4000 to 300 value... and introduce DynamicServerList value(at the moment this value is not set not sure how the apache behaves if this value is not set any suggestion on this pls?)
as well as to introduce ConnectTimeoutSecs (10)& ConnectRetrySecs(2)
Could somebody please point to the solution for this?
Edited by: user2659864 on 14-Dec-2010 01:55

Hi,
If you are completely shutting down the server-01 then once the server-02 sends the response back to the proxy then it would have the fresh list of which servers are running properly, hence if still the proxy is sending the request to the server-01 then this mean that the Apache process have not shared the dynamic server list with the other process or it seems to be a bug in the WLS plugin.
Suggestion try to use the latest WLS plugin and see if you can solve this issue as most of the time it would not be a an issue with WLS plugin.
And if you are suspending the server-01 then the below link would give you a better idea on it as how things works.
Topic: 404 error with Apache and Suspended Weblogic managed server
http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/?p=4567
Secondly by default the value of "WLIOTimeoutSecs " is 300 seconds so if you don't give this value then it would take 300 seconds which goes with "Idempotent" value which is by default "on", hence if the server is not able to send the response then it would fail over the second server after waiting 300 sec . Thus if you decrease the value of "WLIOTimeoutSecs " it would help you in case. More information can be seen below.
Topic: General Parameters for Web Server Plug-Ins
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/plugins/plugin_params.html#wp1143055
Hope that would answer all your questions :)
Regards,
Ravish Mody
http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/
Come, Join Us and Experience The Magic…

Firefox is taking along time to get started after opening home page

after opening firefox it takes a few minutes before I can browse any site or feature. Everything is frozen on the home page for awhile.

Please try transaction WSADMIN for checking web service is working or not.
see the link :http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/2b/036829d238dc46bad91bff1563e183/content.htm
Regards,
BBC Achari

Taking more than 30 min for Delete Index

Hi Experts,
I am trying to delete Index for one of my cube thorugh Process Chain, but every time it is taking morethan 30 mins, even we dont have much data in the cube.
Job Details:
Job started
Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000003309, user ID ALEREMOTE)
Start process DROPINDEX ZCSDC303_DEL_IDX in run DBWIM5VFE7YNJOOGV1YK6KTCQ of chain ZCSD_PWR_CONS_CON
please help me out on this
Thanks in advance
David

Hello David
As you said you have very less data in that cube that means you are not loading too much data on that cube on regular basis.
Deletion and recreation is not absolute necessity. You just need to check if loading without deleting index is not very slow.
Then just drop this steps of deleting index..you can save your 30mins of deletion and recreation.
by the way...what is your database? In MS SQL for some cubes we do not delete index before loading data, which saves lot of time.
You can also check database statistics...and please do a RSRV check for this cube to check if there is any inconsistency,
Regards
Anindya

Download of Firefox browser taking more than a day.

I have been having trouble using my Yahoo mail on Firefox, with different functions getting lost in endless cycles that require me to quit the program and try again, as well as frequently crashing and displaying the Stop Script window. I decided to reinstall the browser, so I AppZapped it on my hard drive, and started a fresh download. However, the download time displays as taking 2 days and counting! That can't be right. I've tried it several times and I keep getting the same result. Any ideas?! Thx.

If there are problems with updating or with the permissions then easiest is to download the full version and trash the currently installed version to do a clean install of the new version.
Download a new copy of the Firefox program and save the disk image (dmg) file to the desktop
*Firefox 8.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
*Trash the current Firefox application to do a clean (re-)install
*Install the new version that you have downloaded
Your profile data is stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder, so you won't lose your bookmarks and other personal data if you uninstall and (re)install Firefox.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

Webi query created on olap UNV 3.1,taking more than 20 min of time to execute

While creating universe 3.1
1-for all measure its ( Database delegate ) fun
2-i hide the l00 objects
while creating the Webi query is taking long time ,what exactly will be the error I am working on( webintelligenc rich client)
help me out with performance tuning doc n
steps

Check this thread. I think you asked almost the same question there as well.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3268487

Firefox freezes when more than 4 or 5 tabs are open at once (Mac OSX 10.6.5) Firefox3.6.13) Started after recent upgrade of firefox

This is not a complete freeze, because I can quit or close tabs with keyboard. Tabs cannot be closed and new ones cannot be opened. Quitting and starting up again frees up tab use.

Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of the add-ons is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
* Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
See:
* [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]

Query taking more than 1/2 hour for 80 million rows in fact table

Hi All,
I am stuck in this query as it it taking more than 35 mins to execute for 80 million rows. My SLA is less than 30 mins for 160 million rows i.e. double the number.
Below is the query and the Execution Plan.
SELECT txn_id AS txn_id,
acntng_entry_src AS txn_src,
f.hrarchy_dmn_id AS hrarchy_dmn_id,
f.prduct_dmn_id AS prduct_dmn_id,
f.pstng_crncy_id AS pstng_crncy_id,
f.acntng_entry_typ AS acntng_entry_typ,
MIN (d.date_value) AS min_val_dt,
GREATEST (MAX (d.date_value),
LEAST ('07-Feb-2009', d.fin_year_end_dt))
AS max_val_dt
FROM Position_Fact f, Date_Dimension d
WHERE f.val_dt_dmn_id = d.date_dmn_id
GROUP BY txn_id,
acntng_entry_src,
f.hrarchy_dmn_id,
f.prduct_dmn_id,
f.pstng_crncy_id,
f.acntng_entry_typ,
d.fin_year_end_dt
Execution Plan is as:
11 HASH JOIN Cost: 914,089 Bytes: 3,698,035,872 Cardinality: 77,042,414
                                                                                9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE Date_Dimension Cost: 29 Bytes: 94,960 Cardinality: 4,748
                                                                                10 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE Position_Fact Cost: 913,693 Bytes: 2,157,187,592 Cardinality: 77,042,414
Kindly suggest, how to make it faster.
Regards,
Sid

The above is just a part of the query that is taking the maximum time.
Kindly find the entire query and the plan as follows:
WITH MIN_MX_DT
AS
( SELECT
TXN_ID AS TXN_ID,
ACNTNG_ENTRY_SRC AS TXN_SRC,
F.HRARCHY_DMN_ID AS HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
F.PRDUCT_DMN_ID AS PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
F.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID AS PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP AS ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
MIN (D.DATE_VALUE) AS MIN_VAL_DT,
GREATEST (MAX (D.DATE_VALUE), LEAST (:B1, D.FIN_YEAR_END_DT))
AS MAX_VAL_DT
FROM
proj_PSTNG_FCT F, proj_DATE_DMN D
WHERE
F.VAL_DT_DMN_ID = D.DATE_DMN_ID
GROUP BY
TXN_ID,
ACNTNG_ENTRY_SRC,
F.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
F.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
F.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
D.FIN_YEAR_END_DT),
SLCT_RCRDS
AS (
SELECT
M.TXN_ID,
M.TXN_SRC,
M.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
M.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
M.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
M.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
D.DATE_VALUE AS VAL_DT,
D.DATE_DMN_ID,
D.FIN_WEEK_NUM AS FIN_WEEK_NUM,
D.FIN_YEAR_STRT AS FIN_YEAR_STRT,
D.FIN_YEAR_END AS FIN_YEAR_END
FROM
MIN_MX_DT M, proj_DATE_DMN D
WHERE
D.HOLIDAY_IND = 0
AND D.DATE_VALUE >= MIN_VAL_DT
AND D.DATE_VALUE <= MAX_VAL_DT),
DLY_HDRS
AS (
SELECT
S.TXN_ID AS TXN_ID,
S.TXN_SRC AS TXN_SRC,
S.DATE_DMN_ID AS VAL_DT_DMN_ID,
S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID AS HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID AS PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID AS PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
SUM
DECODE
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B5, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0))
AS MTM_AMT,
NVL (
LAG (
SUM (
DECODE (
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B5, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0)))
OVER (
PARTITION BY S.TXN_ID,
S.TXN_SRC,
S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID
ORDER BY S.VAL_DT),
0)
AS YSTDY_MTM,
SUM (
DECODE (
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B4, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0))
AS CASH_AMT,
SUM (
DECODE (
PNL_TYP_NM,
:B3, DECODE (NVL (F.PSTNG_TYP, :B2),
:B2, NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0) * (-1),
NVL (F.PSTNG_AMNT, 0)),
0))
AS PAY_REC_AMT,
S.VAL_DT,
S.FIN_WEEK_NUM,
S.FIN_YEAR_STRT,
S.FIN_YEAR_END,
NVL (TRUNC (F.REVSN_DT), S.VAL_DT) AS REVSN_DT,
S.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP AS ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP
FROM
SLCT_RCRDS S,
proj_PSTNG_FCT F,
proj_ACNT_DMN AD,
proj_PNL_TYP_DMN PTD
WHERE
S.TXN_ID = F.TXN_ID(+)
AND S.TXN_SRC = F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_SRC(+)
AND S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID = F.HRARCHY_DMN_ID(+)
AND S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID = F.PRDUCT_DMN_ID(+)
AND S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID = F.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID(+)
AND S.DATE_DMN_ID = F.VAL_DT_DMN_ID(+)
AND S.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP = F.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP(+)
AND SUBSTR (AD.ACNT_NUM, 0, 1) IN (1, 2, 3)
AND NVL (F.ACNT_DMN_ID, 1) = AD.ACNT_DMN_ID
AND NVL (F.PNL_TYP_DMN_ID, 1) = PTD.PNL_TYP_DMN_ID
GROUP BY
S.TXN_ID,
S.TXN_SRC,
S.DATE_DMN_ID,
S.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
S.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
S.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
S.VAL_DT,
S.FIN_WEEK_NUM,
S.FIN_YEAR_STRT,
S.FIN_YEAR_END,
TRUNC (F.REVSN_DT),
S.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP,
F.TXN_ID)
SELECT
D.TXN_ID,
D.VAL_DT_DMN_ID,
D.REVSN_DT,
D.TXN_SRC,
D.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
D.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
D.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
D.YSTDY_MTM,
D.MTM_AMT,
D.CASH_AMT,
D.PAY_REC_AMT,
MTM_AMT + CASH_AMT + PAY_REC_AMT AS DLY_PNL,
SUM (
MTM_AMT + CASH_AMT + PAY_REC_AMT)
OVER (
PARTITION BY D.TXN_ID,
D.TXN_SRC,
D.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
D.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
D.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
D.FIN_WEEK_NUM || D.FIN_YEAR_STRT || D.FIN_YEAR_END
ORDER BY D.VAL_DT)
AS WTD_PNL,
SUM (
MTM_AMT + CASH_AMT + PAY_REC_AMT)
OVER (
PARTITION BY D.TXN_ID,
D.TXN_SRC,
D.HRARCHY_DMN_ID,
D.PRDUCT_DMN_ID,
D.PSTNG_CRNCY_ID,
D.FIN_YEAR_STRT || D.FIN_YEAR_END
ORDER BY D.VAL_DT)
AS YTD_PNL,
D.ACNTNG_ENTRY_TYP AS ACNTNG_PSTNG_TYP,
'EOD ETL' AS CRTD_BY,
SYSTIMESTAMP AS CRTN_DT,
NULL AS MDFD_BY,
NULL AS MDFCTN_DT
FROM
DLY_HDRS D
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 11,950,256 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
25 WINDOW SORT Cost: 11,950,256 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
24 WINDOW SORT Cost: 11,950,256 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
23 VIEW Cost: 10,519,225 Bytes: 3,369,680,886 Cardinality: 7,854,734
22 WINDOW BUFFER Cost: 10,519,225 Bytes: 997,551,218 Cardinality: 7,854,734
21 SORT GROUP BY Cost: 10,519,225 Bytes: 997,551,218 Cardinality: 7,854,734
20 HASH JOIN Cost: 10,296,285 Bytes: 997,551,218 Cardinality: 7,854,734
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_PNL_TYP_DMN Cost: 3 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 5
19 HASH JOIN Cost: 10,296,173 Bytes: 2,695,349,628 Cardinality: 22,841,946
5 VIEW VIEW index$_join$_007 Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 7
4 HASH JOIN
2 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) proj_ACNT_DMN_PK Cost: 1 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 7
3 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) proj_ACNT_DMN_UNQ Cost: 1 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 7
18 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 10,293,077 Bytes: 68,925,225,244 Cardinality: 650,237,974
6 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_PSTNG_FCT Cost: 913,986 Bytes: 4,545,502,426 Cardinality: 77,042,414
17 VIEW Cost: 7,300,017 Bytes: 30,561,184,778 Cardinality: 650,237,974
16 MERGE JOIN Cost: 7,300,017 Bytes: 230,184,242,796 Cardinality: 650,237,974
8 SORT JOIN Cost: 30 Bytes: 87,776 Cardinality: 3,376
7 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_DATE_DMN Cost: 29 Bytes: 87,776 Cardinality: 3,376
15 FILTER
14 SORT JOIN Cost: 7,238,488 Bytes: 25,269,911,792 Cardinality: 77,042,414
13 VIEW Cost: 1,835,219 Bytes: 25,269,911,792 Cardinality: 77,042,414
12 SORT GROUP BY Cost: 1,835,219 Bytes: 3,698,035,872 Cardinality: 77,042,414
11 HASH JOIN Cost: 914,089 Bytes: 3,698,035,872 Cardinality: 77,042,414
9 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_DATE_DMN Cost: 29 Bytes: 94,960 Cardinality: 4,748
10 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE proj_PSTNG_FCT Cost: 913,693 Bytes: 2,157,187,592 Cardinality: 77,042,414

Sync and Create project operation from DTR is taking more than one hour

Hi All.
Recently basis team has implemented the track for ESS/MSS application.So When we import the track to NWDS its showing 500 Dcs.
I have successfully done the Sync and create project operation from DTR for 150 DCS and its take 5 min per Dcs.
However after that when i am trying to sync Dc or create project DC from DTR the operation is taking more than 3 hour per DC.Which should not be the case because for rest 150 DC that i ahve done Sync operation adn Create project operation from DTR it hardly takes 5 min per Dc.As this operataion is taking so much time finally i have close the NWDS to stop this operation.
I am using NWDS 2.0.15 and EP7.0 portal SP15 and NWDI is 7.0
Can any body tell how to solve this issue so that i can Sync and Create project from DTR for a DC within 5 min?
Thanks
Susmita

Hi Susmita,
If the DCs are fine in CBS build, then I feel there is no need to test all of them locally in NWDS.
You can verify some certain applications in these DCs, then you sync & create project for these DCs & test run these applications.
As I get you only need to check ( no changes will be done ), yes you can verify them in small groups (say 20-25 DCs/group) in different workspaces so that no workspace is overloaded.
But why do you want to keep a copy of them locally as you are not making any changes, you can Unsync & Remove these projects once verified & use the same workspace to work on the next set of DCs.
Hope this clarifies your concerns.
Kind Regards,
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Jain on Apr 23, 2009 1:55 PM

XMLSerialize taking more than 10 hours to execute in Oracle

Hi All,
In my current project, converting oracle query into xml format first and then using XMLSerialize for printing but while execution it is taking more than 15 hours and more.
The basic oracle query taking hardly 10 second to execute and converting from oracle query to xml format taking around 1 min but when i am using XMLSerialize with order by clause it is not executing.
Can some help for fixing this performance issue causing due to XMLSerialize
Thanks in advance.
after adding the below clause performance issue started
select XMLSerialize(CONTENT rec_str as CLOB) as test_XML, 100 + rnum as ORDER_CLAUSE from xxtemp
Edited by: redrose1405 on May 1, 2012 12:45 AM

How much free space do you have on your boot drive?
OT

6 million + records, query takes more than 50 min to execute.

Hi
I am trying to get records from a table which has more than 6 million of records.
The value set of the particular col IND can be
NULL
'0'
'1'
and other value like A B '6'
The data type of IND is varchar.
I want all the records where the value is other than NULL, 0 and 1
I tried this simple query
SELECT ID, IND
FROM tablename
WHERE
IND IS NOT NULL
AND IND <> '0'
AND IND <> '1'
Now this query is taking more than 30-40 min. Is this a way I can speed up this query. Also I can't index on the column.
any suggestions ?

I don't know anything about your tables or hardware (nor your Oracle version because you didn't post it) but 30 - 40 minutes seems excessive for a full table scan on only 6 million rows.
On my lowly test instance, this full table scan takes a little over a minute:
| Id | Operation          | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |                       |     1 |     4 | 4800   (2)| 00:01:11 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |                       |     1 |     4 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| ATLAS_SALES_HISTORY   | 6618K|    25M| 4800   (2)| 00:01:11 |
Statistics
        631 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
      55740 consistent gets
      55609 physical reads
          0 redo size
        415 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        346 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
         15 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedAre you pulling all 6 million rows across the network to your client machine? (And waiting for the rows to scroll?)

I have been using USB 2.1 10/100M ethernet adaptor. But it takes more than 15 mins to detect network interface. What should I do. I am not using apple's company adaptor. It's local company.

I have been using USB 2.1 10/100M ethernet adaptor. But it takes more than 15 mins to detect network interface. What should I do. I am not using apple's company adaptor. It's local company.

jsavage9621,
It pains me to hear about your experience with the Home Phone Connect. This device usually works seamlessly and is a great alternative to a landline phone. It sounds like we've done our fair share of work on your account here. I'm going to go ahead and send you a Private Message so that we can access your account and review any open tickets for you. I look forward to speaking with you.
TrevorC_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

HT201274 My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON

My iphone4 is taking more than 5 hours to erase all the data still it is under process , still how much more time i have to wait for my mobile to ON ?

I'm having this EXACT same problem with my iPhone 4, and I have the same computer stats (I have a Samsung Series 7)

Firefox is taking more than 10 mins or never loads home page on mac Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D573). Pls advise thanks

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for