Firewall Ports for Web Services

Hi Experts,
Can you please list what are the firewall ports to be opened to call a ECC 6.0 system web service from a .Net application, assuming both systems are separated by a firewall
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Krishna

Hello ,
Please as far as i know you have to open 4 ports in the ecc system.
They are
Message server port = 36<instance number>
ITS = 80<Instance number>
Gateway = 33<instance number> -- make sure service entries are maintained (sapgw)
If you maintain Central SLD - then the specific port needs to be opened. - 5(instance number)00.
I hope these ports needs to be opened and this is enough, I believe.
Vijay.

Similar Messages

Dynamic Logical Port for Web Service Client

Hi *!
We want to use the same Web Service Client code with different Web Service instances running on different systems. So I need to configure the logical port (especially the URL of the endpoint) dynamically at runtime.
Please give me a hint, how this is done.
(we are using WebAS 6.40 SP7)...
Thanks in advance,
Frank

Hi Frank,
I hope you were able to solve your issue on you own in the meantime.
I was looking for the answer to this question today. This was the only thread I found on SDN. Unfortunately, it did not contain an answer yet. I was able to figure out a way to set the endpoint address dynamically after searching help.sap.com and after examining the interfaces offered by the Stub (logical port in this case) classes.
Here's an extract from my code:
// Connect to JNDI context
InitialContext ic = new InitialContext();
// Get reference to web service proxy from JNDI context
Z_MSC_GET_SCHEDULE_WSDService service =
(Z_MSC_GET_SCHEDULE_WSDService) ic.lookup("wsclients/proxies/iot-online.de/msc~srv_ejb~proxy/de.iot_online.msc.proxy.ScheduleReaderProxy");
// Get reference to logical port from web service proxy
Z_MSC_GET_SCHEDULE_WSD logicalPort = service.getLogicalPort();
// Set URL of web service Endpoint
logicalPort._setProperty(Stub.ENDPOINT_ADDRESS_PROPERTY, "http://<FQDN>:8010/sap/bc/srt/rfc/sap/Z_MSC_GET_SCHEDULE_WSD?sap-client=100");
This is explained on
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/45/113a1221337249e10000000a155369/frameset.htm
You can also set the credentials (username / password) with the method _setProperty.
Best regards
Christian

Type of configuration for web service in SOA manager

Hi Experts,
could you please let me know while creating logical port for Web sevice security which type of configuration should I select in SOA manager. There are three types of configuration. 1> WSDL Based Configuration2>Manual Configuration and 3>Process Integration Runtime.
As per the below link I am going to apply web service security but I dont have authorization to create logical port using t-code lpconfig. So I am trying to create it using SOA manager.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/EN/b8/cb1141e109ef6fe10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Regards,
Sari

Hi Krishna,
Thanks for your reply. But here I am not creating any consumer proxy. I want to create only logical port for CO_WSSEWSSPROCESSOR_VI_DOCUMEN as mentioned in above link. I dont have any wsdl link for the same.Here I want to create logical port where I can mention the RFC for the integration server as per defined by below link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/EN/b8/cb1141e109ef6fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
When I am creating logical port by manual , its not allowing me mention any HTTP destination. By default its showing me as 'unknown' HTTP destination.
Please let me know if I have missed out any configuration. As per above link Java part configurationI have done successfully. But for ABAP part I am confussed while creating logical port.
Regards,
Sari

Invalid Content Type Error for Web Service

Hi Experts,
We have a XI / PI Web Service, and have created an Adaptive Web Service Model for the same. For using this web service model, we have created a HTTP destination of type WSDL.
This configuration works great in our development and consolidation server.
While working with our production server, with all the settings same as consolidation server, the following error is generated for Web Service call. using the AWS model
java.io.IOException: Invalid content type while requesting http://<host>:<port>/webdynpro/resources/<application_package>/guicall.wsdl. Expected Content-type: text/xml, received Content-type: content/unknown, used user to connect: null
The HTTP destination address is the one specified in bold above.
Also, in later part of the stack trace we are bale to see this error:
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.exception.WSModelRuntimeException: Exception on creation of service metadata for WS metadata destination
Please guide us on this issue.
Best Regards,
Alka.

Hi Alka,
How did you configure the Webservice Destinations in Visual Admin for a webservice explosed by XI system.
I mean what was the URL specified, did you specify XI SYSTEM userid password ???
How was the webservice published to inspection.wsil in XI system ??
Thanks,
Regards,
Aditya Metukul

Re: Why doesn't WL7.0 support get/post bindings for web services ...

hi!!!
Could you pls point to any code example.
thanks
Pushpa
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Manoj: Thanks for the answer - do you have or can you point me at any
code samples
that accomplish this? (Yes, .NET is limited to strings/ints in their
get/post
bindings).
Thanks so much!
RB
PS - Also, can you explain any apparent discrepancy between your answer
and what
the WL documentation stated (again, it may be my misunderstanding).
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
WL 7.0 does allow you to access the web service through
the browser. It even allows you to invoke service methods
with complex type arguments (.Net only supports primitive
types) and also to view the request and response soap
message for the invocation.
regards,
-manoj
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation,WL 7.0
does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for meto
access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used
the
automatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems
like
it
would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without havingto
write a
middle tier.
NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that
BEA
chose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in anyway?
or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshoppositioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL definesWeb services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message containeither
message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are describedabstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and messageformat
to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstractendpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and theirassociated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols areused
to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describehow to
use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

This isn't a straight FORM Post as in the http binding support in WSDL. It posts
a soap message.
It's apparent that Workshop supports form-post and form-get.
But I dont see how it is done with straight WebLogic webservices. Does WebLogic
server read the web-services.xml or the WSDL file? I dont see a way to put in
http-post binding in the former and in the latter it seems to be ignored.
Can someone clarify.
Thanks.
Chu-chi
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
Here is a live example:
http://65.193.192.35:7001/base/SoapInteropBaseService
Here is an example that you can download:
http://manojc.com/?sample2
This is how you run it:
http://manojc.com/?tutorial/doc/howtorun.html
More info can be found from the edocs:
7.0:
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs70/webserv/index.html
8.1:
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/webserv/index.html
Regards,
-manoj
http://manojc.com
"pushpa krishna" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
hi!!!
Could you pls point to any code example.
thanks
Pushpa
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote:
Manoj: Thanks for the answer - do you have or can you point me at
any
code samples
that accomplish this? (Yes, .NET is limited to strings/ints in their
get/post
bindings).
Thanks so much!
RB
PS - Also, can you explain any apparent discrepancy between your answer
and what
the WL documentation stated (again, it may be my misunderstanding).
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
WL 7.0 does allow you to access the web service through
the browser. It even allows you to invoke service methods
with complex type arguments (.Net only supports primitive
types) and also to view the request and response soap
message for the invocation.
regards,
-manoj
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation,WL 7.0
does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for
me
to
access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used
the
automatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems
like
it
would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without havingto
write a
middle tier.
NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that
BEA
chose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in
any
way?
or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshoppositioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL
defines
Web services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message containeither
message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are describedabstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and messageformat
to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstractendpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and theirassociated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols
are
used
to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describehow to
use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

Why doesn't WL7.0 support get/post bindings for web services ...

This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation, WL 7.0 does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for me to access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used the automatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems like it would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without having to write a
middle tier.
.NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that BEA chose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in any way? or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshop positioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL defines Web services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message contain either message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are described abstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and message format to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstract endpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and their associated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols are used to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describe how to use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

Manoj: Thanks for the answer - do you have or can you point me at any code samples
that accomplish this? (Yes, .NET is limited to strings/ints in their get/post
bindings).
Thanks so much!
RB
PS - Also, can you explain any apparent discrepancy between your answer and what
the WL documentation stated (again, it may be my misunderstanding).
"manoj cheenath" <[email protected]> wrote:
WL 7.0 does allow you to access the web service through
the browser. It even allows you to invoke service methods
with complex type arguments (.Net only supports primitive
types) and also to view the request and response soap
message for the invocation.
regards,
-manoj
"Richard Berger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
This might be a naive question, but according to the documentation,WL 7.0
does
not support http post/get bindings for web services. Thus, for meto
access a
web service, I need to write a "middle tier" of some sort (I used theautomatically
generated Java proxy code and JSP). All works fine, but it seems likeit
would
sure be nice to have HTML forms access web services without havingto
write a
middle tier.
NET does this and it is extremely useful - is there a reason that BEAchose not
to provide this feature? (e.g. is it architecturally unsound in anyway?
or is
there an easy way to simulate it?). Given some of the Web Workshoppositioning
re: ease of use and .NET comparison, this seems like an omission.
Any insights are greatly appreciated.
Enjoy,
RB
PS - Here's the info from the documentation
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 Specification
WSDL is an XML-based language that describes Web services. WSDL definesWeb services
as a set of endpoints operating on messages; these message containeither
message-style
or RPC-style information. The operations and messages are describedabstractly
in WSDL, and then bound to a concrete network protocol and messageformat
to define
an endpoint. Related concrete endpoints are combined into abstractendpoints (services).
WSDL is extensible to allow the description of endpoints and theirassociated
messages regardless of what message formats or network protocols areused
to communicate,
however, the only bindings described in the specification describehow to
use
WSDL in conjunction with SOAP 1.1, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME.
Note: WebLogic Server supports only SOAP 1.1 bindings.
The WSDL 1.1 Specification is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.

WSDL error during generation of ABAP proxy for web service

Hi friends,
I am getting error during the generation of ABAP proxy object for web service developed in .NET .
Error : Proxy generation terminated: WSDL error (<extension> not supported).
How to make this WSDL file compatible for ABAP proxy.
I have tried to edit WSDL file in XML Spy but did not get any option to replace/remove the tag <extention>.
If any one worked on this. Please help me its urgent.
Thanks and regards,
Shivanand.

HI ,
I am having the same issue!!!
Does ABAP Proxy Generation support <extension> ?
Is there a list available of what is supported and what not (please consider I do not have access to sap notes)?
Thanks

Can you specify the port for default services when installing OEG?

Hi everyone,
The default installation of OEG 11g uses 8090 port for management services, and 8080 for the virtualized services that you register in the gateway. After installation, you can change the ports by editing gateway's Profile Repository in Policy Studio. But is there a way to specify the port number before/during the installation?
Thanks,
Iris

Hi -
here are the steps to change the listening port (in 11.1.1.6)
- Connect to OEG using Policy Studio
- Click on "Edit Active Configuration"
- Under "Services", find the default services, and you'll see a listener for port 8080 there. Right-click to edit this.
- Change the port from 8080 to your desired port. Note that if you've installed the software and running it as a non-root user on Linux, then it will not have permission to bind to a low-number port (like port 80 for instance)
- Now deploy your change (for 11.1.1.6 hit F6 or click on the "deploy" button which is towards the right of the toolbar in Policy Studio).
- You may also choose to version your configuration at this point (click on "version" which is beside the "deploy" button and enter a comment about your version).
Now verify that OEG is listening on your new port. You can see it bind to the new port by looking at the trace [Connect a browser to port 8090 on OEG, login as admin or another user who has rights to view the trace, then click on "Trace"].
It's a usual practice to configure a new listener on SSL (e.g. on port 443) then to delete that pre-configured port 8080 listener, if you want to only receive traffic over SSL.

Do I need to open ports for my services if I am connecting through VPN

Hi,
I work in a small office and we are trying to connect people remotely to our server through VPN.
Using the Server App I managed to make VPN work and successfully connected to our file share points, so that means file sharing worked without opening ports for afp on my Airport router.
On the other side I cant connect to other services as iCal and Address Book as I am locally in the office. Does that mean I have to open the ports for those services on the router, if yes then why use VPN in the first place.
Thanks,

If I understood you correctly:
External client -> (server.domain.name) -> Router -> Server: is working
Internal client -> (server.domain.name) -> Router -> Server: is not working
Internal client -> (local ip) -> Server: is working
If yes, you can implement a-la "split zone DNS".
1. On the external DNS your domain name server.domain.name resolved to the external router IP.
2. You should add record (and zone) server.domain.name to your OS X Lion Server DNS pointing to local IP
When you are connected to VPN, system sets DNS server to your Lion server and server.domain.name is resolving to local IP.
When you are working without VPN, system use external DNS and server.domain.name is resolving to external IP.
Of course, you should open ports for your services on the router is you want to use them from external network.
I am using this configuration and it works perfectly.

Best book for Web Services

Can you suggest me what's best book for Web Services and XML to study? I'm planning to buy..
Thanks in advance..

Why does it need to be the best one? What would that even mean? Just buy something reputable, like an O'Reilly book, it's not going to be so horrifically poor that you can't learn from it

How to activate trace for web services

Hi Experts,
How to activate trace for web services in SOAMANAGER.
We are not able to view the Payload trace of the error logs.
Can anyone please let me know how to go about this???
Regards,
Ashwini

Hi Ashwini,
The thread below might be useful to you:
[SOAMANAGER - Get the XML generated;
Regards, Trevor

Building client proxies for web services with SOAP attachemtns

Hi all.
I'm currently building a series of web services that take SOAP attachments as
input, but I am unable to generate the java proxies for testing the services via
WebLogic Workshop 8.1. When I attempt to build the proxy, I get the following
error:
Warning: Failed to generate client proxy from WSDL definition for this service.
Suggestion: Please verify the <types> section of the WSDL.
Is there something I need to alter to get this to work, or does workshop not support
client proxies for web services with DataHandler parameters?
Thanks.
-Brian

Thanks for the help. This is my first web service with SOAP attachments, so it
may have been a long time till I realized that.
-Brian
"Michael Wooten" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Thanks Brian,
The problem is that you are trying to use the "document" soap-style :-)
If you change this to "rpc", you'll should be able to successfully generate
the
client proxy jar. The soap-style property, is at the bottom of the "protocol"
property sheet section, for the JWS.
Regards,
Mike Wooten
"Brian McLoughlin" <[email protected]> wrote:
Sure, sorry about that. Attached is the wsdl for a sample web service
I created
just to test the proxy generation.
"Michael Wooten" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Brian,
Would it be possible for you to post the WSDL, so we can see what might
be causing
the problem?
Regards,
Mike Wooten
"Brian McLoughlin" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all.
I'm currently building a series of web services that take SOAP attachments
as
input, but I am unable to generate the java proxies for testing theservices
via
WebLogic Workshop 8.1. When I attempt to build the proxy, I get the
following
error:
Warning: Failed to generate client proxy from WSDL definition for
this
service.
Suggestion: Please verify the <types> section of the WSDL.
Is there something I need to alter to get this to work, or does workshop
not support
client proxies for web services with DataHandler parameters?
Thanks.
-Brian

Stub for web service in JSP

How do i embed a scriptlet inside my JSP page for the stub of my web service? is there any examples that i can refer to?
Thanks in advance. ;)

Check out the 2 How To:
9.0.4 / 10.1.2 "How to use OC4J JSP Tags for Web Services" [1].
10.1.3 (preview) "Access J2EE 1.4 JAX-RPC Java Web Services from Web Clients" [2].
Hope this helps,
Eric
[1] http://www.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/tech/java/codesnippet/webservices/wstags/index.html
[2] http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/101/howtos/jaxrpc/java14_ws_web_clients.html

About XML Parameter for Web Service invoking

I would like to use the XML parameter as the Web Service's input(Attachment is
the XML schema) in WebLogic Server 8 sp1. When I generated the Web Service and
use the WebLogic Server generate test web page to test it, I got Exception. The
WebLogic Server can't constructe the input XML.
The correct XML should look like this:
<ids>
<desc>Description</desc>
<id>1</id>
<id>2</id>
<id>3</id>
</ids>
Is there any one can tell me whether this kind of XML was permitted for Web Service
invoking or not?
[sample.xsd]

Hi Andy,
On the test page, before the invoke of the operation, did it say
something like:

if so, the service itself may be working OK, the deficiency is that the
test page tries its best to determine sample values for the invoke,
however it does not know in this case.
Did you try with a client?
Your XML should be fine.
Regards,
Bruce
Andy wrote:
>
I would like to use the XML parameter as the Web Service's input(Attachment is
the XML schema) in WebLogic Server 8 sp1. When I generated the Web Service and
use the WebLogic Server generate test web page to test it, I got Exception. The
WebLogic Server can't constructe the input XML.
The correct XML should look like this:
<ids>
<desc>Description</desc>
<id>1</id>
<id>2</id>
<id>3</id>
</ids>
Is there any one can tell me whether this kind of XML was permitted for Web Service
invoking or not?
Name: sample.xsd
sample.xsd Type: ACT Project (text/xml)
Encoding: base64

(261936172) Q general Are there seperate logs for web services?

Q<general> Are there seperate logs for web services?
A<general> It does not appear that there are any separate logs for web services.
There is knex.log file that records the errors that occur during deployment of
your .jws files. There is also the standard server log that provides information
about server status - you can write to this programmatically if you wish. There
is also the access.log file which record all the HTTP requests so this might cover
some of your web service requests that are transmitted over HTTP.

Maybe the user has deniad Access to the Runbook, check in Runbook Designer.
Seidl Michael | http://www.techguy.at |
twitter.com/techguyat | facebook.com/techguyat

Firewall Ports for Web Services

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for