Firmware crash on cisco 1310 Bridge while upgrade to higher version

Dear experts,
My cisco 1310 Bridge old firmware C1310-K9W7-tar.123-8.jea3 is crash while i try to upgarade to the higher version C1310.K9W7-tar.124.10b.jda2 via HTTP service upgrade, any advise to get back the firmware.
rgds,
woo.

It appears that you are assigning IP address properly. For some reason we are not getting a response from TFTP server. This is typically one of 2 things:
1. Firewall on the TFTP server workstation
2. Connectivity issue between AP and TFTP server
I would check firewall settings on the TFTP workstation. Are you connecting the AP to the workstation directly or through a switch? If it is through a switch, you could plugin a different workstation to the AP switchport to make sure it could reach the server as well.
-Pat

Similar Messages

Connection loss of cisco 1310 bridge.

Hi Experts,
I have cisco 1310 bridge with IOS version Version 12.3(7)JA5. Sometimes bridges are disconnecting by showing the following error message.
*Mar 1 01:22:21.856: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 003a.99eb.cc00 Reason: Previous authentication no longer valid
*Mar 1 01:22:22.115: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:26.414: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:26.484: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station SNUDH1BRIDGE 003a.99eb.cc00 Associated KEY_MGMT[NONE]
*Mar 1 01:22:27.386: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:27.388: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 003a.99eb.cc00 Reason: Previous authentication no longer valid
*Mar 1 01:22:30.831: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:31.170: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:31.786: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:31.854: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station SNUDH1BRIDGE 003a.99eb.cc00 Associated KEY_MGMT[NONE]
*Mar 1 01:22:33.277: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:33.279: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 003a.99eb.cc00 Reason: Previous authentication no longer valid
*Mar 1 01:22:35.760: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:36.456: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:37.264: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:37.356: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station SNUDH1BRIDGE 003a.99eb.cc00 Associated KEY_MGMT[NONE]
*Mar 1 01:22:39.198: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:39.200: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 003a.99eb.cc00 Reason: Previous authentication no longer valid
*Mar 1 01:22:39.518: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:39.771: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:42.093: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
*Mar 1 01:22:43.580: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client 003a.99eb.cc00 reached max retries, removing the client
Once it is deassossiated, ihave to manually restart the bridges. How can avoid manual restarting so it would automatically associate after some time.
Also time is getting changed after restarting. Please help me to solve this problems.
Regards,
naisam

Hi,
Following are the answers for your questions.
How often does this happen ?
This is happnenig two or three times in a day and mostly at eavening when the data traffic is high.
What is the distance between the bridges and RSSI ?
Distance is near to 600 mtr and RSSI is continously keep on changing between -51 dBM to -75dBM
Did this ever work without this issue or is this a new install ?
This installed one year before as a back up to my fiber link. This problem started recently only.
Thanks,
Naisam

Ipod nano 1.2 version how upgrade to higher version?

I recently received an ipod nano 1.2 version. iTunes purchased songs load into my ipod but do not play because they need a 1.3 version or higher to play M4P ACC (Protected) songs. How do I update the Ipod Nano application that I have to a higher version (1.3)?

In a link to compatible song formats, it says you need version 1.3 or later to play purchased songs that have an AAC format (protected). We are new to this, so that may be for a different type of iPod than the nano
That software is for the first and second generation regular iPods. All other iPod models come with the necessary firmware to play AAC files. You should be able to sync the purchased music to your iPod; if you can't, try the instructions in this article.
(14212)

Firefox 4 stalls on instalation while upgrading from previous version

I've tried to upgrade to Firefox 4 from version 3.6.17 several times, but every time I try to install version 4 it stalls halfway through the installation procedure. I then have to reinstall version 3.6.17 again. I have disabled the add ons that were reported to be incompatable for the new version.

Thanks for the response. If it is, indeed, Apple Magic, then I would expect Time Machine to be aware of this and account for it. However, numerous people have reported that Time Machine sees this as a separate item to backup and it bloats the backup.
I'm just curious to understand how this works from a filesystem perspective.
Thanks again for reading and helping.

HT4972 I have a new iPhone 3GS but cannot upgrade to iOS5 or 6, it gives me errors, is there another way to upgrade to higher versions of ios5?

iPhone 3GS is brand new but gives me errors when attempting to downliod iOS6, I have tried 10 times - same error
same everytime..
Anyhelp here? Thanks IAN

Are you sure you have an iPhone 3G and not an iPhone 3 because the iPhone 3 are not capable of running anything beyond 4.2
Allan

1310 Bridge-Building to Building advice.

I am looking at implementing building to building wireless using Cisco 1310 bridges. This would be a backup link between the 2 buildings. The primary link is 3 T-1's. There are about 250 users connecting back here for application and internet. I am assuming that since the speed over the wireless is more than the existing T-1's that there shouldn't be a problem with latency. Am I missing anything with my thinking?
Thanks

Hey there,
If you use a BR1310 to cover 3 T1s you should be fine.
The BR1310 can get up to 54mbs (28mbs in reality due the the nature of half duplex devices such as these bridges).So even with less than ideal signal quality and strength you should have no problem getting that kind of throughput.Ideal links get in the low to mid 20s.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Aaron

Cisco 1310

Greetings...
I am trying to setup two Cisco 1310 bridges (AIR-BR1310G-A-K9-R) for connectivity between two buildings. No external antennas have been setup yet and I am just setting the basic configuration.
One is running c1310-k9w7-mx.123-8.JEA3, the other c1310-k9w7-mx.123-7.JA1…
I have one setup as a root-bridge, the other as a non-root bridge.
However, even after disabling authentication and encryption, both units are still not talking to each other. Arghhh....
Maybe a second set of eyes can see an issue? Thanks in advance.
Root Bridge:
no aaa new-model
dot11 ssid GPRM
   authentication open
   infrastructure-ssid
username Cisco password 7 096F471A1A0A
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
ssid GPRM
speed basic-1.0 basic-2.0 basic-5.5 6.0 9.0 basic-11.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
power local cck 20
power local ofdm 20
power client 20
station-role root bridge
distance 1
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.0.31 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip
Non-Root Bridge:
no aaa new-model
dot11 ssid GPRM
   authentication open
   infrastructure-ssid
username Cisco password 7 02250D480809
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
ssid GPRM
speed basic-1.0 basic-2.0 basic-5.5 6.0 9.0 basic-11.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
no power client local
power client 20
power local cck 20
power local ofdm 20
station-role non-root bridge
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
hold-queue 80 in
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.0.32 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip
Thanks for any suggestions....
Joe

Joe:
The no response in the logs mean that the non-root bridge did not reply to the root at all.
Try to remove "distance 1" command as well. this 1 means 1 Km. it should not have big effect anyway but remove it if you are not using the bridges with 1+ Km distance.
try to use Dot11radio1 (802.11a) to test bridging if it works or not.
Also, you can try exchange the roles (root, non root) between two devices and check further.
successful assocaition should be seen by the command:
show dot11 associations.
I hope that after you get both bridges on same version they will sucessfully assocaited.
Good luck.
Amjad

BAdi & user-exits while upgrade from 4.6c to ECC6

Hello all,
Can anybody put light on how User-exits and BAdi will be effected while upgrade from lower version to ECC6.
Many Thnanks.....
Apps.

Hi,
The main concept of enhancements is to keep the code unaffected during version upgrades
Hence all the BADI implementations and User Exit/Customer exits implementations will be in place and no effect due to upgrade...I hope in case of badi, some new BADI(as part of enhancement framework-GET BADI/CALL BADI) will be added up and the old BADI(Those in 4.6c or below) will not get affected.
Regards
Shiva

Upgrading from cisco LMS 3.0 to a latest version

Hello,
Upgrading from cisco LMS 3.0 to a higher version.
Whatdoes it require?.
What is the current version?
What do we need for upgrading?
Are there specific codes or new need to buy new products?
In case of buying new products, which are the configurations?

H Malik,
You are correct! Latest version is Cisco prime LMS 4.2. There is no direct upgrade from LMS 3.x to LMS 4.x.
The procedure is simple:
Take backup orf old LMS --> Un-install (if same machine)--> Install new LMS --> Restore backup to get old data.
You would need to purchase new license for it.Cisco Prime LMS is now part of the Cisco Prime Infrastructure bundle and is not orderable separately. Cisco Prime Infrastructure bundle follows a size-based incremental licensing model. Device licenses can be combined and added when applied to a single server installation instance. Customers have the option of adding incremental licenses for additional devices as their network grows.Refer to the Cisco Prime Infrastructure Ordering Guide located at http://www.cisco.com/go/primeinfrastructure for the exact part number that matches your requirement and placing the order.
Currently even SmartNet or SAS contracts does not cover major upgrades from LMS 2.x and 3.x; an upgrade part number will need to be purchased to move to Cisco Prime LMS 4.2. These upgrade part numbers reflect a significant discount to protect customers' investment in the Cisco Prime product line.
The data migration process will vary depending on the LMS version from which the data need to be migrated. Migrating data to LMS 4.2:
• LMS 4.2 supports local upgrade or direct inline upgrade only from LMS 4.0.1 and LMS 4.1.
• LMS 4.0 customers are encouraged to install LMS 4.0.1 before doing inline upgrade to LMS 4.2.
• LMS 3.2 and LMS 3.2 Service Pack 1 customers can do a remote upgrade through the LMS backup and restore mechanism.
• LMS 3.1, LMS 3.0, LMS 3.0 December 2007 Update, LMS 2.6, and LMS 2.6 Service Pack 1 customers need to do a remote upgrade to LMS 4.0.1 and then upgrade to LMS 4.2.
-Thanks
Vinod

How upgrade to higher OS X

I have old mac book OS X wih old version 10.5.8, how can i upgrade with higher version in my computer for Mac OS X 10.6.8 or higher?

You'll first need to buy a copy of Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. That's still available from the online Apple Store; for the US, see:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC573/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard
If it's not listed on the web site of the Apple Store in your country, call the online Apple Store, they may still have copies of Snow Leopard available .
If they no longer have it available, you'll need to look to private sellers, and the prices are rising quickly. If you buy from a private seller, make sure you get the retail disk set (white label with a picture of a Snow Leopard), not the system disks from another model of Mac (grey label).
Once you have Snow Leopard installed, then you can consider whether you wish to upgrade to a yet newer version of Mac OS X; 10.7 Lion, 10.8 Mountain Lion, 10.9 Mavericks, as your system will support. Which of those if any your MacBook will run will depend on the specific model you have.
Regards.
Forum Tip: Since you're new here, you've probably not discovered the Search feature available on every Communities page, but next time, it might save you time (and everyone else from having to answer the same question multiple times) if you search a couple of ways for a topic, both in the relevant forums and in the Apple Knowledge Base, before you post a question.

SCCP IP PHONE 7911 ERROR WHILE UPGRADING FIRMWARE

Hi All ,
I am experiencing problem while upgrading Cisco IP phone model 7911 in my VoIP setup as my Cisco CM server is using firmware version ‘SCCP11.8-3-4SR1S’ for these phones. Whereas new 7911 IP phones coming from Cisco as RMA these days are having latest firmware version ‘SCCP11.9.2(1)’. While resetting the phones to factory defaults they are getting hanged during upgradation and giving error ‘ term11.default’. As per my research, i cannot upgrade or downgrade phone firmware from sccp11.8-3-4 to sccp11.9.2 and vice versa directly.
So i read the release notes of 9.2.1and there I found, i have to upgrade phone first in 8.5.2 base release and then I can go any version.
But when I am upgrading my phone into base release 8.5.2, sometime my phone prompt me ''ERROR'' on display and boot from its previous ifirmware and sometime it prompt ''UNPROVISIONED'' on the display and phone get stuck there.
My CUCM version is                     -6.1.2.1000
IP PHONE FIRMWARE version     -SCCP11.8-3-4SR1S(existing)
NEW load version                         -SCCP11.8.5.2
So request to all expert please suggest me to fix my issue.
regards
amit tanwar

Hi All ,
Anyone have any solution for my issue ?.
regards
amit

1310 Bridge Firmware and Console Troubles

A few days ago, we lost the Ethernet connection to one of our 1310 Bridges. Restarting the unit restored access for a short time. A technician tried to reload the IOS over the console port and set the speed to 115200, and then lost the ability to communicate with the device. I have tried to console into the device using every speed from 110 to 921600, but cannot establish a connection. Also, the LEDs are showing a firmware load error (red, amber, red). Is this device bricked, or is there a way to recover it?
Thanks in advance.

You'll have to try password-recovery process. Here's the link:
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/products_password_recovery09186a00800949d0.shtml#ca_1310_ser

Configuration of a Point to MultiPoint link with Cisco Aironet 1310 bridges

Hi All,
The previous problem of which I started another conversation here:
http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topic=General&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1ddba023
somehow dissapeared. It could have been a problem of interferences.
I have another issue with other (multipoint) wireless WAN link, which I hope has a solution.
On the central node, we have an Cisco Aironet 1310 bridge configured as root-bridge. It has a panel of four vertical polarity 17 dBi panel 90? antennas, with more than enough gain (there is a 250 mWatts 802.11 b/g amplifier, before the 4-way splitter) and excellent line of sight to three remote bridges.
The three (03) remote bridges are also Aironet 1310 models, confidured as non-root-bridges.
The problem we have is that it seems that when the three remote links operate concurrently the amount of lost packets is huge. When I shutdown the radio interfaces of two bridges, the remaining bridge makes an excellent link with the central node.
It seems that some hours are more critical than others, also the links operate much worse when there is some (small) network traffic in them.
I have read the 1310 manuals, and I can't find a sample configuration for point to multi-point links.
Does someone knows what radio interface configuration should I need to use to establish better quality communication?
I mean, perhaps the 1 x root - 3 x no root configuration is not recommendable for the multipoint link configuration.
Any hints will be welcome.
Best Regards,
Igor Sotelo.

Hi All,
Thank you for the information. I configured the distance on the root bridges, but the links showed instability.
I'm using a bi-directional amplifier. It has two pieces. According to the manuals, one is installed indoors, the other outdoors. I'm not sure if the indoors piece has the transmition module or it's only the injector.
We could establish connection at 7 km (around 4 milles) distance from the central point, using 24 dBi antennas on the other side.
However, we have issues with a near located point that is only 1.2 Km (around 0.8 milles) away and has a 13 dBi integrated patch antenna. The signal strenght value we get there is in the -62 to -68 dBm range, and is noticiably (5-10 dBm) lower than the strenght we get at other points of the link. And I have trouble establishing a high quality link with that point, using OFDM modulation. I tend to think that if I remove the amplifier I'm not going to reach that point at all. The EIRP on the central iste is 34 dBm / 2.5 watts, without amplifier it would be 26 dBm / 0.4 watts.
On the opposite sites the EIRP is 33 dBm / 2 watts using CCK or 28 dBm / 0.63 watts using OFDM.
When one looks at the central site from that point, an Motorola Canopy with passive reflector (EIRP 48 dBm or around 64 watts) can be seen. It doesn't have the same direction, but the opposite site must be large distance and could interfere with my wireless network. Attached is an amplified photo of the view. It's safe to assume that the Canopy operates in the 2.4 GHz frequency range.
Once I connect the point at 1.2 Km, the multipoint link loses its quality, and soon the lost packets get too frequent.
The CCK seems to be much more interfered than OFDM, I guess because of that canopies.
Another thing I'm wondering about is if the Aironet 1310 can continuosly switch CCK-OFDM over the same point - multipoint link, without losing packets.
What other parameters should I tweak? Is there a way to avoid interferences fromt the canopy?
I would like to apply 100 mWatts local power using the radio with OFDM, but it seems that's not possible.
Best Regards,
Igor Sotelo.

Cisco 1310 used as Bridge: Option for integration to WLC or WCS

What is the best management option for the Cisco 1310 being used as an Autonomous Bridge (pairs: Root and Non-Root). We want to manage and have some reporting back into the WCS.

WCS 6.0 configuration guide says that only AP1130, 1200, 1240, 1310
Bridge are supported.
The autonomous to lightweight migration support feature provides a
common application (WCS) from
which you can perform basic monitoring of autonomous access points along
with current lightweight
access points. The following autonomous access points are supported:
* Cisco Aironet 1130 Access Point
* Cisco Aironet 1200 Access Point
* Cisco Aironet 1240 Access Point
* Cisco Aironet 1310 Bridge

IPhone crashed while upgrading, won't restore

As above - crashed after iTunes asked me to upgrade. During the process it died. Has been left with an iTunes plug-in icon on screen. Tried taking out sim card, plugging in to different UBS ports, etc. Restore process doesn't work, it crashes again halfway through.
Is it dead? Am in Singapore, guessing I need to find a Mac store... Just wondering what the chances of repair are.

You can try iPhone Data Recovery. You are provided three ways to restore contacts on iPhone, which are recovering them directly on iPhone, from an iPhone backup,and from iCloud backup files.What you have to do is very simple.
Step 1.Install iPhone Data Recovery and connect your iPhone to your computer.
Step 2. Choose a suitable mode to continue
You can choose "Recover from iOS Device", "Recover Deleted contacts from iTunes" or "Restore Contacts from iCloud". You can choose a favorable mode to continue the progress.
Step 3. Click "Scan" your iPhone
Step 4. Preview the contacts and recover deleted them from iPhone
I believe you can retrieve your lost contacts.

Firmware crash on cisco 1310 Bridge while upgrade to higher version

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for