Firmware version not correctly showing up

I've updated my firmware but it only correctly shows the correct version on certain pages in my wireless control page.
Some pages still show the old version, more specfically the wireless page which had some changes in the new firmware and i need do encryption on.
anyone know the problem?

hi...after upgrading firmware on the device have you reset it?? if not try resetting the device back to default settings and reconfigure it...also let me know the model and version no. of the device and firmware version...

Similar Messages

Submit button in inserted HTML is not correctly shows

Submit button in inserted HTML is not correctly shows.
<input type="submit" name="submit" value="Submit">
Button doesn't have a round gradient background like in real HTML.
Looks like Muse translated it not correctly. Muse doesn't use inserted code directly to the browser.
The ??? is how to see a real html appearance?

Dear All
I feel adobelance is giving us a pretty good answer.
I tried code in Dreamweaver and got:
And in Muse I got:
I did have to change the border from outset to solid grey (to give it the colour) - the main difference seems to be the font. It was close enough for me, though.
I am not a Dreamweaver developer and this is the first code I have run in Dreamweaver (successfully, anyway).
Muse allows Designers to sketch web sites and as such is good - but it is not Dreamweaver. I admit I subscribe to Creative Cloud - so I can use Dreamweaver or Muse and am using the latest version but I am a fan of Muse so far.
My HTML in Muse is
<form>
<form method="post" action="senddata.php">
<label for="lastname" style="color:black; background:light grey">Last Name:</label>
<input type="password" id="lastname" name="lastname">
<input type="submit" value=" Submit Form! " style="border:2px solid grey; color:black; background:light grey">
</form>
I do hope this assists you all.
Kind regards

Freight Charges does not correctly show Tax % / calaculate

Hi
When I try to add freight charges to an A/P invoice the tax group shows correctly (V1) but the Tax % shows 0.0 instead of 7.5 on every row/type of freight and therefore the Tax is not calculated automatically.
Somebody an idea whats wrong?
Thanks
Franz

Problem solved.
As a difference to all the other modules, A/P Invoice does not have the current day as default posting date (maybe this a bug). Since the Tax calculation needs the posting date, it does not correctly show the Tax on the main form as well as on the freight dialog, it shows the correct code, but always with 0%.
So, for correct tax calculation, always make sure the posting date is entered before.
@SAP: Change the behavior with the default posting date, as it is in all other modules.
Best regards,
Franz

HP OfficeJet Pro 8600 Plus Firmware version not current on the HP Downloads Page

My HP OfficeJet Pro 8600 Plus came with Firmware version CKP5CN1334ER which the printer update says is up-to-date. The HP downloads page shows CLP1CN1322CR as the current version. Can you tell me what the differences are in version 1334 from the one (1322) on the web page?
It would be nice to have the latest version posted for download to prevent confusion.

Same question here.

PDF properties version not correct?

Hi all
We are having some serious confusion since a customer pointed out that the rendered pdf claims that it has been rendered with Livecycle Forms 7.0 but the version of Livecycle Forms used to render it should be 7.1. We have parallel instances of 7.0 and 7.1, which would make it possible for a mixture to happen. But nothing other than the pdf property suggests that there is anything wrong, which would mean that the pdf should report that it has been rendered with Forms 7.1 or are we missing something simple here???
Any help appreciated, either if you can tell us that Forms 7.1 actually produces the assumed result of reporting 7.1 as used version for rendering or the opposite.

Hello,
I forgot to mentian. The questions number changed. Its about (mainly)
question 21 now.
And the outline of the header of the form. (left in PDF instead of middle)
Greets
Tiemen
2013/9/16 Tiemen deW <[email protected]>
Hello,
Thanks for answer. I just shared the form.
>
Tiemen
>
2013/9/14 [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> Re: PDF export view not correct created by [email protected]<http://forums.adobe.com/people/kenc%40adobe.com>in
>> FormsCentral - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5681268#5681268>

Transport Request Active version not correct

Hi,
We have been moving the Trasport Request from Development to Quality. Here each time a new version is created.
But when i was testing it was taking the runtime of
old version even though the Active version is the recently moved one.
I have also tried deleting the old version of the workflow
in Quality and moved again, this time it is not moving.
This is R/3 4.7, Level55, Was 6.2, Travel workflow (BUS2089)
Please let me know if you have any idea.
Thank you,
Regards,
Boobalan

hi,
the same issue occured for my workflow as well. Please try this out as well, this rectified our issue ;
Phenomenon:
You have changed your workflow template in client 000. If you look to the workflow definition in another client with SWDD, then you see the newest version as just maintained in client 000. But at runtime, the old (former) version of the workflow definition is used.
Cause:
When activating a workflow template, then also some client specific data is replicated from client 000 to the other clients. In this replication there is currently an error. I just talked to a workflow colleague. The problem we have observed seems to be just the tip of an iceberg ... . They are working on the issue(s) related to this.
Workaround:
Execute function module SWD_WFD_REPLICATE_FROM_9999 in the client, you need to have the newest template definition. Enter your workflow template ID (with pattern "WSxxxxxxxx") in parameter IM_TASK and execute. Make sure that you do not lock the template in SWDD.
Then you also (may) need to execute transaction SWU_OBUF to synchronize the buffer.

Website menu not correct show wit ipad/imac

Dear sir,
This is mayby not the wright place to ask this question (sorry).
The website www.a2models.nl is shown correct in all browsers on a pc, buth when I look with an ipad/imac with safari, the end of the horizontal menu moves below.
The homepage in Dutch and English is made with Dreamweaver. I integrated a webshop from Mijn Webwinkel (Logivert).
The layout.html is made by a webshopdevelopper, but can't/won't help me, because I've made a little change in the layout (only a horizontal menu in red).
The container is 700px I've tried to make it bigger but it didn't help or made the with auto which also didn't help.
Took some space but this didn't help.
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you verry much for your reply.
Carla

Not much to go on there.
You basically said it is broken with no link to see it , no information on how it is built or anything
Literrally could be 100's of reason for incorect css, malformed html, javascript error and more.
You need to at least post a link so people can take a look.

IPad Usage not correctly showing!

I have 3rd Generation ipad 32GB Wifi + Cellular running on iOS 7. When I see usage [Settings>General>Usage] its only 6 GB Available and 21 GB is used.
When I manually total the size of applications its only 6.5 gb, then where is my extra space going. I have tried rebooting.

go back to settings and look at usage again - then wait a minute or so. a listing of apps will appear, and if you tap one, you will see the total program, p,us data associated with that app. you may have a lot of data associated with some of your apps. for example, i have pages. the app shows as 373meg. when I tap the app - it shows me total program and data is 1.4G. Add those up, and you will approach the larger number you see above.
pictures, audio, video, and comic books eat up space.

Need a Script to Audit Firmware version of HP components.

Hi Team,
I am new to this portal, I am not sure if i have selected the correct board for this issue. If not please redirect thie thread to the correct team or guide me the link to the HP Blade system portal.
My issue:
We have 285 HP Servers, Where almost 275 are HP Proliant BL460 G7 & G8 Blades and the rest are HP DL380P and DL380 Standalone servers.
We recently did a HP SPP Update on all these machines and now for a reason we want to Audit if the component updates were correctly done by our engineers or not.
How ever for HP OS Components i have a script to Scan the registry and pull the Product version and match it to see if it has the Latest version or not.
But how do i do an Audit for the ILO'S of these machines and the Onboard Administrators and the HP Virtual connect if the firmware versions are correct or not ?
Is there any script or any Method to achieve this ?
We also have HP SIM tool as well, Can we do it form that? If yes then how ? Can any one please help in this ?

Frederik, After some tweaking and testing i was able to get it working, I haven't tested it via GPO as a startup script but standalone it is doing what i was after. I cant thank you enough for helping me on this as i had lost hope after days worth of intense
searching
Change that i had to apply ( space in a network path
was causing a "path not found error", Had to rename the "Office365 update" and update the path in Customconfig.xml or any other location that was pointing to "office365 update" )
set DeployServer=\\contoso\c2r\Office365 update\
REM Set ConfigFile to the configuration file to be used for
deployment (required)
set ConfigFile=\\contoso\c2r\Office365 update\Customconfig.xml
REM Set LogLocation to a central directory to collect script
log files (install log files are set in XML file).
set LogLocation=C:\AppData\Local\Temp

SG300-28P - POE not correctly supported on all ports - possible firmware or hardware issue

So, I spent some time this weekend troubleshooting the issues I've had with the new SG300-28P switch and POE to many of my devices in the office. As a recap, I cannot utilize all of the 24 POE ports on the switch for POE purposes. Really only every other port [with a few odd combinations thrown in between]. In addition, the SG300-28P switch, on occasion, is sending POE to non-POE devices [e.g. my Ruckus Zone Director 1106].
Here are my POE devices [all 802.3 af-compliant]:
3 Ruckus 7982 access points
1 Pakedge access point
2 home-automation controllers
2 Polycom voip phones
I called Cisco support several times in regards to this problem, and they figured it was a hardware issue - a faulty switch. So, Cisco sent me a replacement SG300-28P, which I hooked up today. The exact problem still occurs. Default configuration [fresh out of the box]. No way I can land, for example, the 3 Ruckus 7982 AP's on ports 1, 2, and 3 [or ports 1,13, and 2]. I have to put them on ports 1, 3, and 5 in order for them to power up. In addition, I can't plug any other POE devices on the ports either between or below them.   I had to skip another port bay. This is very odd behavior!!   Two Cisco SG300-28P's in a row with the same problem.
However, I also had one of the new Cisco SG300-10P switches in my possession for a recent project of ours. I decided to hook up the same POE devices to this switch. ALL POE devices were recognized and worked! No need to skip a port. And it didn't matter what device was plugged in first or not. I am now convinced that it is either a hardware issue [bad power supply/transformer?] inside all of the SG300-28P switches, or a firmware issue.
Both of the SG300-28P switches were running firmware 1.1.2 [the latest on Cisco's website]. So, I decided to install an older firmware version on the SG300-28P switch that I'm returning [installed 1.1.1.8].   Here's what I found out. I could then plug 2 POE devices [e.g. two Ruckus AP's] in adjacent horizontal ports, but not three in a row. In addition, not all adjacent ports. It's funky. For example, I could plug an access point in ports 20 and 21, but not in 21 and 22. No rhyme or reason in how it worked. And I still couldn't plug an access point in adjacent vertical ports [e.g. ports 1 and 13]. BUT...
It's interesting that the same exact switch that would not initially allow 2 horizontally-adjacent POE ports to be utilized WOULD allow 2 horizontally-adjacent POE ports to be utilized when running a different firmware version.   It's also interesting to note that when plugged into a "non-working" POE port, the SG300-28P would actually make a small whining noise. Very subtle noise; I could hear it when approx. 1ft away from the switch.   The noise was not noticeable when ports were skipped [and POE actually worked]. Therefore, I believe that Cisco has some SG300-28P firmware bugs [at least in the last two versions of firmware] that is not truly allowing all 24 ports to utilize POE correctly. This problem does not exist with the SG300-10P switch.
I'm really interested to hear what Cisco's reply and findings on this matter would be. And would welcome a reply from one of their senior support team members/managers who could actually experiment with this, too.   In addition, I'd like to know when they think a solution could be created if it's firmware-related. If hardware-related, I don't think I'll be recommending any 28P switches in our projects. Perhaps just the regular SG300-28 with a separate SG300-10P. It's a shame because the SG300-28P is more of a bargain when compared to the two separate components.

show power inline
Port based power-limit mode
Unit Power Nominal Power   Consumed Power   Usage Threshold   Traps
1     On      180 Watts     13 Watts (7%)          95         Disable
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi1                               Auto            On      critical class0
gi2                              Never           Off        low     class0
gi3                               Auto        Searching   critical class0
gi4                              Never           Off        low     class0
gi5                               Auto            On      critical class0
gi6                              Never           Off        low     class0
gi7                               Auto            On      critical class2
gi8                               Auto        Searching     low     class0
gi9                               Auto        Searching     low     class0
gi10                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
gi11                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
gi12                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi13                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi14                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi15                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi16                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi17                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi18                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi19                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi20                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
gi21                             Never           Off        low     class0
gi22                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
[0mMore: , Quit: q or CTRL+Z, One line:                                                          gi23                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
gi24                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
show power inline gigabitethernet xx (for each device plugged in)
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi1                               Auto            On      critical class0
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is on - valid resistor detected
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            3
Invalid Signature Counter: 17583
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi2                              Never           Off        low     class0
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            0
Invalid Signature Counter: 0
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi3                               Auto        Searching   critical class0
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is off - detection is in process
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            2
Invalid Signature Counter: 1
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi4                              Never           Off        low     class0
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            0
Invalid Signature Counter: 0
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi5                               Auto            On      critical class0
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is on - valid resistor detected
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            0
Invalid Signature Counter: 0
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi7                               Auto            On      critical class2
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is on - valid resistor detected
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            0
Invalid Signature Counter: 0
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi13                             Never           Off        low     class0
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            1
Invalid Signature Counter: 0
Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
gi14                             Never           Off        low     class0
Power limit (for port power-limit mode): 15.400W
Port Status:               Port is off - user setting
Overload Counter:          0
Short Counter:             0
Denied Counter:            0
Absent Counter:            0
Invalid Signature Counter: 0
show interfaces advertise gigabitethernet xx (for what ports are of interest)
Port: gi9
Type: 1G-Copper
Link state: Down
Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                  1000f 1000h 100f 100h 10f 10h
Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes yes
Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    -
Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    -
Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
Port: gi10
Type: 1G-Copper
Link state: Down
Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                  1000f 1000h 100f 100h 10f 10h
Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes yes
Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    -
Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    -
Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
Port: gi11
Type: 1G-Copper
Link state: Down
Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                  1000f 1000h 100f 100h 10f 10h
Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes yes
Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    -
Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    -
Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
Port: gi21
Type: 1G-Copper
Link state: Down
Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                  1000f 1000h 100f 100h 10f 10h
Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes yes
Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    -
Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    -
Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
Port: gi22
Type: 1G-Copper
Link state: Down
Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                  1000f 1000h 100f 100h 10f 10h
Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes yes
Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    -
Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    -
Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -
Port: gi23
Type: 1G-Copper
Link state: Down
Auto negotiation: Enabled
                                  1000f 1000h 100f 100h 10f 10h
Admin Local link Advertisement    yes    no     yes   yes   yes yes
Oper Local link Advertisement     -      -      -     -     -    -
Oper Remote link Advertisement    -      -      -     -     -    -
Priority Resolution               -      -      -     -     -    -

TS4123 This is not correct solution. I have fresh copy of Windows 7 64 bit and I have the same problem. Autorun only shows the Bonjour service. It started when try to sync more than one iphone.

This is not correct solution. I have fresh/new copy of Windows 7 64 bit and I have the same problem.
Autorun only shows the Apple Bonjour service. It started when try to sync more than one iphone over WiFi. I have two iphones and an iPad. I turned off syncing over WiFi and still has high CPU utilization. One of the CPU's is pegged at 100%. It is the AppleMobileDeviceService.exe process.

For the record, I then followed the suggestion of MarcDCMB in https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4291206 of just manually restarting the Apple Mobile Device service in Windows services.msc once each time after starting iTunes and the service no longer hogs CPU after that service restart. Not too painful as a work-around, and apparently an effective one, but clearly not a solution to the problem. Again, as above, all the other solutions didn't work for me and I have no conflicting software as far as I can tell. So you'd have to say this Apple's problem.
Also FTR, I am still on the 5.2.0.6 version of the Apple Mobile Device Support MSI and I don't know if that is relevant to this work-around working but my sense is that it is NOT relevant. I'll report back on this thread if I re-upgrade and the problem returns in spite of the service-restart approach.

Firmware version 5.0.1 is up to the iPhone battery runs out very well in normal use. I have not used it a lot.

Firmware version 5.0.1 is up to the iPhone battery runs out very well in normal use. I have not used it a lot.

yes it happen with iphone but u can resolve the problem of draining battery
1.try to off the all apps correctly by pressing the home button twice and hold the app untill wingle and then click on - opption
2. turn off your bluetooth all the time if not needed
3. turn on 3G when needed
hope u can enjoy with that

As a new Macbook Pro user I was saddened to find that the feature of using keywords in iPhoto '11 does not allow showing same under each photo. I understand this was available in earlier versions. Any comments?

As a new Macbook Pro user I was saddened to find that the feature of using keywords in iPhoto '11 does not allow showing same under each photo. I understand this was available in earlier versions. Any comments?

Against TOU which you "agreed" to in order to post in these user to user forums. If you want to "suggest" something to Apple, do so in the Product Feedback area.

Mac OS X Lion Macintosh HD is show's not correct data.

Mac OS X Lion Macintosh HD is show's not correct data. Every time is changing the capacity. In Disk Utility everything is correct, but when i'm doing get info in Macintosh HD every 10 sec is growing up. I compare get info with disk utility in get

In First Time is 749.3 GB Capasity, but Available 762GB. Used --- (this time i used like 80 GB) .. But now Available 630 GB Used 118 GB and this changing.. growing every 15 sec, but in Disk Utility Used 143 GB and not changing.
I have verified with disk utility and and repired disk premissions, it's not help me..

HT201210 I backed up old phone to PC then did a sync to new 4S but when trying to update apps on phone it states - account not valid in Argentine store, must switch to U.S. store. I am in US and when I view account on PC it correctly shows me in US. Now w

I backed up old phone to PC then did a sync to new 4S but when trying to update apps on phone it states - account not valid in Argentine store, must switch to U.S. store. I am in US and when I view account on PC it correctly shows me in US. Now what?

log out and log back in again to store
and if required
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1311

Firmware version not correctly showing up

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for