Fixed receipts in MD04

Hi Friends,
As we know we can view stock requirement list using T code MD04. If we double click on stock, another screen triggers where there is field called "fixed receipts"
To calculate fixed receipts the following fixed receipts are taken into account in the total calculation:
Purchase orders
Schedule lines
Consignment orders
Consignment schedule lines
Production orders
Receipt reservations
Our developer is asking how we can fetch this information pragmatically?. Please guide somebody.
Thanks

Hi,
have you tried changing the settings in OVZ9?
Good luck.
Regards,
Anisah

Similar Messages

Return Order Quantity as Fixed / Planned Receipt in MD04

HI
Can anyone guide me to configure to show Return Sale Order Quantity as Planned or Fixed Receipts in MD04 transaction.
Thanks

The MRP controller uses the display function (MD04) to review both MRP lists and stock requirements list to analyze the requirements and decide on a course of action (company designates an individual as a MRP controller and MRP controller is indicated in Material Master record).
It enables the MRP controller to process the requirements and make informed decisions to change and/or approve purchase requisitions and stock transport orders thus triggering the acquiring of materials.
Your material is returnable packing material. The material is available and does not require MRP planning. There is also no need to trigger a requirement to procure the material. Hence this return does not show up in MD04 list.

Discontinued parts - how include fixed receipts??

In the MRP 4 view , we can set Discontinuation indicator for one material ,and defined the follow-up material.
And the system will transfers the dependent requirements in materials planning to the follow-up material if they are no longer covered by warehouse stocks.
In standard SAP system , When discontinuing parts, the system does not include fixed receipts such as order proposals or production orders if they are after the effective-out date. The system issues the "Please cancel and Receipt" after effective-out date exception messages in Stock/Requirement List (MD04 View)
But we now indeed need the system to include fixed receipts,that is affter the last fixed receipt ,the discontimuting parts begin to take effect!
How to do this? How discontinuing parts include fixed receipts??
Thaks for any replay!

Hi Fei Liu,
The thing is rather simple; the idea with discontinuation is that from a certain date on we don't want to procure material A anymore, but B instead. Nevertheless, if there's any stock left from A I want to use it first.
In this situation, if somebody manually creates a fixed procurement element, like purchase or production order, the system will only create an exeption message for the planner, since by the normal course of the process this should not have happened.
If you have this situation happening a lot, the question is then if you're using the right functionality for your business case.
Regards,
Mario

Optimizer not considering first 5buckets of fixed receipts elements

Hi,
I am running SCM-Deployment optimizer.I am facing issue like optimizer is not considering five buckets of fixed receipts.Need your help on this.

Hi
is it possible for you to check the values in pull deployment horizon, push deployment horizon and SNP checking horizon in the location product master (tab page SNP2). If you want the deployment optimizer to consider these values, they must have a value of > 0.
Amol

SA Schedule Lines Fix indicator in MD04.-

Hello,
   I want to modify fix indicator from Schedule Agreement Schedule line in transaction MD04.
   (check and uncheck)
   Could you tell what to do?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Juan Manuel Caballero on Oct 6, 2009 9:00 PM

Hi
There are two possible scenarios for fix indicator
1) Firm indicator will be set automatically based on the no of days maintained in the firm zone from the date of MRP run.
2) If you change the schedule line manually the system will set the firm Indicator automatically.
I think there is no provision in SAP to change this manually in MD04.
Hope it helps
Thanks /Karthik

MRP - Unfix Fixed Schedule Lines with partial receipt

Dear Experts,
I am facing a problem that I haven't been able to solve using previous postings in the forum nor reading OSS notes.
I have a Factory PL01 that needs some raw materials that are bought and received in a distribution center DC01 located in another city.
Procurement data in material master MRP views:
In PL01, this Raw materials have external procurement with special procurement key "transfer from DC01"
In DC01 this Raw materials have external procurement witho no special procurement key (standar purchase order)
To make things easier we have an LU Scheduling Agreement and also maintained source list to generate automatic schedule lines after running MRP.
This is working ok.
My problem comes here:
When I create the delivery for schedule line (VL10G) the receipt becomes fixed in PL01. Lets say theorical quantity is 20.000 on schedule line but finally supplier can only deliver 18.000 to DC01 and DC01 can only transfer 18.000 to PL01.
in MD04, plant PL01 There will be a fixed pending quantity of 2.000 for the schedule line that will not be overwritten by MRP runs.
I would like to "Unfix" this fixed quantity but I can't. I read previous postings and many people say it's not possible and that quantity should be adjusted manually in schedule line to delete the fixed receipt.
Does anybody knows how to manage this? Can the remaining quantity of schedule line be unfixed? If not: Is there a more efficient way than adjust one-by-one the schedule lines ?
Please throw me a light about this.
Best Regards,
Sebastián Ligueros

Sorry I cant help you in your question but, i think you can help me in my.
I need to use MRP to creade the schedule lines for an schedule agreement LU but even when the Info record is set, plants are set witht the vendor and customers, MRP is not creating the Schedule lines automaticaly.
Do you remenber what things are required to do it?
I also set the source list with the Schedule Agreement and put it as relevant to MRP (2).
Any help will be great thanks.

MD04 table name for stock statistics

hi, all
i'm wondering how can i find out the table name for MD04- stock statistics - Fixed receipts, the structure's name MDSTA-SUM02.
I tried use ST05 to trace the update table name, i created a Production order, this "fixed receipts" field is updated. but i counldn't find out the right updated table for this particular field.
does anyone know how to find it or if anyone knows the right table name for it! thanks

Depending what you're trying to do, you can do a test run on MD_STOCK_REQUIREMENTS_LIST_API. The only information you need to enter is the plant and material. You'll want the results in E_MDSTA. That will only be reasonable if you're trying to find the value for a single plant and material, though (or a handful). If you need this information for all materials at all plants and need it frequently, which would seem more likely, your ABAPers can use this function in their report. Again, the only info they'll need to pass to it are the plant and material. Hope that works out for you.

Fixed PR in MRP

Hello Friends,
In SAP book it is written that in MRP system considers firm planned order and firm purchase requisition as part of availbale stock.
Now I have a material which has VB as MRP type and reorder point is 100 and for this material there is purchase requisition of 120 (this PR is not fixed), so system should not have considered this PR since it is not fixed. But system is considering this PR and does not create furthermore PR in MRP run.
Can you please explain?
Thanks
PL

In SAP book it is written that in MRP system considers firm planned order and
firm purchase requisition as part of available stock.
if you run a MRP" with delete and recreate in planning mode, system won't delete the The PR which have fixed id ( system will take the fixed receipt as part of available stock, so system won;t create any New PR
purchase requisition of 120 (this PR is not fixed), so system should not have considered this PR since it is not fixed. But system is considering this PR and does not create furthermore PR in MRP run.
If you run MRP with delete and recreate in planning mode, system will delete the unfirmed PR and recreate a New one

Planned orders in MD04

Hi Experts,
Is it possible to remove planned orders from Receipts in MD04?

Dear Anshu,
Is your requirement not to display/show the planned order in MD04 or else delete the planned order so that it's not normally
displayed without any filter option in MD04.
1.Deleting the planned order using MD12/MD16 or else in MD04,double clcik the planned order>change icon->delete will
permanently remove this planned order from MD04.
2.Using the filter option the planned order's can be hidden/not shown in the list.
Come back with your exact requirement.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

STO returns and visibility of qty at plant vendor in MD04

Hi Guru's,
When I create a return STO in R/3 the requirement appears at the receiving plant in MD04 but no receipt appears at the supplying plant (it is a return so opposite to normal). When I create a delivery for this STO nothing changes in the MD04 view at receiving or supplying plant.
We would like to see the return and the return delivery as a receipt in MD04 so it it contributes to available qty. Can you provide some ideas on how this could be done?
Thanks
Andrew

Hi,
I have similar problem for our client. Can you explain me how to you resolved the issue?
Thanks,
Muthu

Fix for SDRQCR21

Hi All,
Has SAP come up with permanent fix for this MD04 problem?
Please let me know. I would really appricite any response on this. We are getting this issue quite frequently. We need to run this report quite frequently. We want permanent fix.
Thanks,
Sanjeev

Hi,
the requirements errors often occurs when, sales order and/or delivery processing user-exit , are implemented incorrectly.
The following OSS note
[Note 415716 - User exits in delivery processing|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/415716]
contains the guidelines for the proper implementation of the exit routines in delivery processing.
The same rules, with the exception of some methods and table names, are also applicable in the sales order processing.
Andrea

Exception message 20 vs ATP

Hi all
There are some stock transport purcahse orders availble for one material with exception message 20 in MD04. The exception message 20 means cancel the process. So is there any affect on ATP check. Could you please confirm.
regards
sap

Hi
Exception message 20 means, it is not created for any dependent requirement i.e., not created for higher level material.
Might be manually created and it is excess requirement.
Exp message 20, it is a excess qty. If any dependent req. will come in future, system will consider this excess qty.
Normally exception message 20 indicates when there is excess stock available (or going to receive through some fixed receipts) after fulfilling all requirements.

Linking of planning calender to vendor master record

Hi All,
Could you please let me know how I can determine a particular date of a week as the delivery date (Monday to Friday) by the vendor and plant combination.
That means
A purchase order created on 30 September for material X plant YYYY and vendor V1 has a receipt date of Friday 10 October.
As the fixed receipt date is Thursday, the actual delivery should occur on Thursday 16 October.
This receipt date based on fixed weekday must be the one computed by MRP calculation and appears on MD04 stock requirement list as actual receipt date.
(I have got how to make it for the plant, that is by giving the Planning cycle in the MRP2 view and for that we have to select time phased planning that is R1 in MRP type field in the MRP1 view.) I have also seen in the vendor master alternative data for a particular plant I can give the Delivery cycle and planning cycle but they don't determine according to vendor plant combination when I do MRP run in MD03 and see the PR s created.
Please let me if you need further explanation
Brownie points are waiting for helpful answers!!!!!!!!!

Hi Kishore,
Thanks for the suggestion, but I have one question in my mind. If we have to determine the delivery date according to a particular vendor then we are maintaining the planning calender and delivery calender in the vendor sub range,and we are also maintaing the vendor in the source list for that plant and material and making the vendor as MRP relevant, then
Is there any need to give planning cycle in the MM record,as now we are not utilizing the material master record planning calender, instead of that we are using vendor subrange planning cycle and delivery cycle.( I tried to run MD03,after removing the planning calender in the MM record and I got the error "Error determining planning periods for calender")
More over what is the difference between the planning cycle field and delivery cycle field in the VM record?
Please let me know as this is a requirement from the client which we need to map ?
I am using MRP type PD and lot sizing as PK(period lot size for planning calender)
Regards,
Sushanta

Schedule lines firming

Hi,
In MD04 we can able to see the * indicator for some of the schedulelines which got firmed due to the firm zone period. But when we look into the same schedule lines in ME38 fixing indicator is not set for the same schedule lines..
Kindly explain these two indicator difference. Also clarify lines whcih are fimred due to the firm zone peroid have the fix indicator in ME38 or not.
Thanks in advance.

hello Rajprabhu,
The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The
fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for
table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only
transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as
firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm
transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed
which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the
vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as
fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them
with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement
schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as
fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if
this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be
contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule
line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line
ETENR), you should be able to find out whether a transmitted quantity
was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out
correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no
update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169,
117093, 134356).
First, the system behaves as intended.
It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this
indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling
agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity
is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have
upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
Sanjeev

Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

Dear Experts,
We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
Regards,
Soumick

Hi,
The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
Solution
First, the system behaves as intended.
It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
Regards,
Udaya.

Fixed receipts in MD04

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for