Fixed vendor on PR not copied to PO

Hi,
I have a third party process where the purchase requisition was automatically created with a fixed vendor which was picked up on PR because info record is maintained. No source list is maintained for this material.
When the PO was auto-created for this PR, it was created for a different vendor (with an info record marked for deletion). There is only 1 active info record for this material and it is for the vendor on the PR.
I checked and there were no changes to the PR or the PO. So why wasn't my fixed vendor copied from the PR to the PO during automatic PO creation ? And why would the PO chose an inactive info-record ?
Thanks in advance !
Alas

I wasn't expecting you to answer my issue re: workflow. I was just informing you of the steps I have to take in case others stumble on this post. You really don't have to be rude, or even respond ! And just so you know - with workflow, the auto PO flags are not considered !
Regardless- my client had custom code for how they select their vendors, regardless of the fixed vendor field on the PR. In that logic, they disregard the deletion flag of the purchase info record.

Similar Messages

Onetime vendor - address is not copied into the purchase order ME21N

Dear all,
I have a issue about using onetime vendors, if I have entered a dummy address on the onetime vendor, this address is not copied into the prucase order when I create a PO for this vendor type.
My problem is that we want to use the ME59 to create PO automatically for these onetime vendors but I get the message 06035 - Enter a address on the PO.
So my question is if anybody can propose a solution for this.
Best regards, LB

>
Lars Birk wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a issue about using onetime vendors, if I have entered a dummy address on the onetime vendor, this address is not copied into the prucase order when I create a PO for this vendor type.
> My problem is that we want to use the ME59 to create PO automatically for these onetime vendors but I get the message 06035 - Enter a address on the PO.
> So my question is if anybody can propose a solution for this.
>
>
> Best regards, LB
One time vendor can never hold vendor specific details i.e. vendor details and bank details. You cannot use a one time vendor for ME59, use regular vendor account instead for your requirement or enter the address manually at time of conversion as per the message.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jul 13, 2010 1:34 PM

I have an ipad 2 and just rented a movie. When I try to load the movie to the ipad it indicates that it was not copied to the ipad because it cannot be played on the ipad. How do I fix this?

I have an ipad 2 and just rented a movie. When I try to load the movie to the ipad it indicates that it was not copied to the ipad because it cannot be played on the ipad. How do I fix this?
P.S running software version 4.3.3

I have the same problem on an original iPad.

Is it not possible to create a PR with Fixed vendor without an Info-record

Hi,
We have a requirement in which data necessary for PR(Purchase Requisition) creation ( replenishment orders ) comes from a legacy system and we use the BAPI -BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE to create the PR's.
The problem is when we try to create PR by using plant in the field fixed vendor present in Source of Supply tab, we are getting the error message, "Inforecord for Vendor xxx and material xxxx does not exist ". This message is due to the plant given in fixed vendor field and missing info records. And we always use only "plant" as fixed vendor.
Is there any way to avoid the determination of info records based on fixed vendor?
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: Dagny on Aug 28, 2009 3:01 PM
Edited by: Dagny on Aug 28, 2009 4:30 PM
Edited by: Dagny on Aug 31, 2009 11:09 AM

Kurt Lang wrote:
It is more than well known that Flash is not supported on the iPad or iPhone. Adobe officially threw in the towel even attempting to get a working player for mobile devices that one, doesn't chew up battery life; two, doesn't eat up so many system resources.
The focus now is on Adobe AIR and HTML5. So don't expect to ever see Flash for the iPad.
I don't understand the reply. This is the Power Mac forum. Is the real problem finding a PowerPC version of Flash and Adobe Reader? If so, Adobe dropped Flash support for PowerPC in February.
http://lowendmac.com/ed/bashur/11db/powerpc-flash-support.html
How evil is this? Well, Apple itself no longer supports PowerPC in its last two major OSs, 10.6 and 10.7. So the problem here is a very old Mac.
There is an Adobe Reader for PowerPC.
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5245
Adobe kept putting out PowerPC updates longer than Apple did!
Also, Adobe Reader is available for iOS, if that was part of the original question.

Fixed vendor in source list not recognized by MRP

Hi
I have a source list (ME01) with a listed info record for a particular plant/purch.orgvendor/material combo.
I have ticked the fixed vendor tick and flagged it as MRP relevant (MRP=1).
When I run the MRP the purchase requisition is created but the vendor field in the purchase requistion is empty. Somehow the MRP does not recognize the source list settings. No fixed vendor is allocated to the purchase requisition.
Validity period of source list is checked.
I have checked the User exit LMEQR001, but nothing is implemented.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Lars
Edited by: Lars Tornblom on Jan 15, 2011 5:10 PM

Hello Lars,
Please check the following settings in cutomization;
SPRO>>Materials Management>>Purchasing>>Environment Data>>Define Default Values for Buyers.
Select : Double Click: Settings for Default Values.
Now select the group and go to Source determination Tab.
In tab under pre-setting of automatic source dtermination indicator.
Tick the check boxes Create purchase requistion and create purchase order vendor unknown.
Note: In ME01, if your vendor is external then you have maiantain thye vendor in vendor fileld. If vendor is internal (say plant to plant transfer) then vendor needs to be maintained under ppl field.
Br,
Tushar

Vendor partner function not getting copied from opportunity to ERP order

Hi,
I have created vendors in ERP and replicated them to CRM. The number ranges are different in both the systems. IN CRM it is Y033100476 and in ERP it is 33100476. I have put Y033100476 in the parties involved assignment block and create ERP sales order as follow up. When i do this the broker partner function first of all doesnt appear with partner function Y033100476. And the system gives me warning that "CRM business partner Y033100476 could not be mapped to an ERP customer", i have seen the notes 1236015 and 1446253, but still its not clear to me, that why the vendor partner doesnt gets copied to ERP sales orders, am i missing any setting?

By standard you:
1. associate customers to plants in ERP under spro>Materials Management> Purchasing>Purchase Order>Set Up Stock Transport Order. There select button "Plant" to get a list of all plants in the system. Select one plant and press button "Details". In the details screen enter customer number you want to assosiate with plant.
2. mapp table customer <-> Plant in CRM in table CRMM_LOCMAP. In order to update this table with the information from ERP, run the download object DNL_PLANT. After the download is completed, the table CRMM_LOCMAP should be filled with fresh records which map the 'plant business partners' to respective plants. But as I said in previous post, you can also
manually update this table with the correct mapping entries.
Regards.

Items in the Itunes library were not copied because of one or two errors occurred. How to fix this problem?

Items in the Itunes library were not copied because of one or two errors occurred. How to fix this problem?

Hello mobyash,
Have you tried converting each of these 8 tracks to a different file format and seeing if they will then sync to your iPod. See this Apple support document for information and instructions on how to convert a song to a different format.
iTunes: How to convert a song to a different file format
B-rock

Deletion of Preferred or Fixed Vendor when we copy the SC from Old SC's

Hey SRM Experts,
When we copy the SC from the Old SC's, Is it possible to delete only the Preferred or Fixed Vendor Information and all other information should be copied to the new SC?
Thanks for your input on this. Helpful answers will be rewarded.
MP

Hi,
You can modify the SC data using the BADI "BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI".In the BADi,based on the action "COPY"(Check SY-UCOMM),you can delete the value for the vendor in the SC data.
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

How can I fix "-- not copied --" message?

When I connect (synch?) my iPad, I keep getting this message:
"8cbc37c2" was not copied to the iPad "MY iPad" because it could not be found.
How do I fix this and how do I find out what app is or contains 8cbc37c2?

It possibly means that one of your apps is no longer on your computer - it still appears in the Apps library in iTunes but the actual physical file is no longer on your computer. You could go through the Apps section of your library in iTunes double-clicking on each and hopefully on one of them you'll get a 'cannot locate file' popup; in which case remember which app it is, delete it from iTunes, and then re-download it

Fixed Vendor in Source List not picking in MRP proposals

Dear All
For a matrial, we have maintained two Contracts as Sources in Sourcelist. Both sources are valid and MRP relevant(MRPindicator 1 in Source list)
We then fixed the second Source ( fix indicator in second line in Source List)
Then Run MRP. The expectation was that the second source will be picked as its fixed. But the MRP proposed Purchase Requstion and Planned orders are picking the first source only (non fixed one)
Wanted to to clarify whether the fix source indicator does not have any relevance during MRP ? OR is it some other problem?
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Regards
Shyam

Hello
As already mentioned by Jürgen, the indicator 'Fixed source of supply' is not considered by MRP at all.
See the following note which explains that in more detail:
110074
MRP: Source of supply, several valid source list records
Therefore, please make sure that there is only one source list item relevant to MRP.
BR
Caetano

I have followed the directions given and still can not copy and paste, how can I fix this?

I am trying to use the copy and paste function on a website and I get a message window that states that firefox does not allow cut/copy/paste. I followed the link for help and created the js. text file like instructed with the website's URL. I still can not copy and paste. I can copy and paste on this website with internet explorer, but not with firefox. I can not perform all the website functions with the internet explorer brower and switching back and forth from browser to browser is very time consuming and a hassle. Please help me solve this issue.

Try this using extension - Allow Clipboard Helper - it makes that a lot easier to do and lessens the incidence of user error. <br />
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/852

How to change Preferred Vendor to Fixed Vendor in SC - SRM-5.0

SRM Experts,
We are using SRM 5.0, ECC 6.0 and PI-7.0.
We are using classic scenario in SRM. When user selects the vendor with Outline agreement in SOS tab then SC creates PO in backend system because it has Fixed Vendor otherwise SC creates PR in the backend system.
We have a new requirement in SRM to create PO instead of PR in the backend system if Purchasing Org=5xxx and total value of SC is less than USD 5XXX and Vendor is a Preferred Vendor in the SC.
Do I need to use the Check Document BADI to check the total value of the SC and to check whether it is a Preferred Vendor and then in the Change Document BADI, change the value from Preferred Vendor to the Fixed Vendor before SC is saved?
OR someone has any other suggestions on this?
Which BADI is called first Check Document or Change Document before saving the SC?
Thanks in advance!
MP

Hi Atul/Disha,
I sent you my code and problem in detail at your email address.
Here is the requirement for Changing Preferred Vendor to Fixed Vendor. We are on SRM 5.0 and using classic scenario. I am new to SRM world. I also checked the note- 962474 in our system and it has been applied. We upgraded to SRM 5.0 in Oct-07.
1.     My client has customization for sources of supply tab. It shows the vendor information in SOS tab based Product category, Plant and Purchasing group selected in the SC. If SC contains Vendor with Outline agreement then SC creates PO in the backend system. So in Change BADI logic for new enhancement of converting Preferred vendor into Fixed Vendor should not change anything in the SC using Outline agreement.
2.     We have created Custom table-zsrm_fix_vend with fields, purchasing group, company code, currency and total value.
3.     We need to convert the preferred vendor into fixed vendor
    if the SCs 1st line item purchasing group = zsrm_fix_vend-ekorg and
             SCs 1st line item company code = zsrm_fix_vend-bukrs     and
           SCs currency = zsrm_fix_vend-currency                   and
           SCs Total value less than(<)zsrm_fix_vend-totalvalue.
My testing results and problems
1.     When I create a new SC with less value than totalValue from the custom table, change document BADI is changing the preferred vendor into fixed vendor and it is creating PO in the backend system. So this is working as expected.
2.     When I create a new SC with greater value than totalValue from the custom table, change document BADI is NOT changing the preferred vendor into fixed vendor and it is creating PR in the backend system. So this is working as expected.
3.     When I use Outline agreement in the SC, it is creating PO in the backend so change BADI logic is not affecting this existing functionality which is good.
4.     Problem - When I copy a new SC from existing SC with less value than totalValue from the custom table and then changing the amount with the greater value than the custom table, change document BADI is not changing the fixed vendor to the preferred vendor and when I click on sources of supply tab - it is giving me an error Partner Function may not be Changed and it exits me to main shopping cart screen.
5.     Problem - When I copy a new SC from existing SC with greater value than totalValue from the custom table and then changing the amount with the lessser value than the custom table, change document BADI is not changing the preferred vendor to the fixed vendor and when I click on sources of supply tab - it is giving me an error Partner Function may not be Changed and it exits me to main shopping cart screen.
6.     When I copy the SC with Outline Agreement and change the amount it works all the time it is not affected by the change document BADI which is good.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Millions thanks to you!
MP

Windows XP + iTunes: (sync) photos not copied...cannot be displayed on ipod

Hello all,
I'm sorry if this is a known and solved issue but I'm really frustrated about it.
I have bought a brand new ipod Classic 80GB. My system is running Windows XP SP2 (up to date) and iTunes 7.5.0.20. I have an NTFS Hard Drive (2 Partitions, C and D) and a FAT32 Hard Drive (1 Partition, E).
Every time I try to sync my ipod through iTunes with a video or photo I get the following error message: "Some of your photos, including the photo PHOTO_NAME, were not copied to the iPod IPOD_NAME because they cannot be displayed on your iPod."
What is this? I have followed the photo (and video) sync procedure to the letter. On my laptop (also Win XP SP2), iTunes works just fine! So there's nothing wrong with my photos/videos.
I looked around the Internet and found there's a similar issue in Windows Vista with RAID and/or NTFS. I do NOT have RAID or Vista.
It there a known bug also in Windows XP? Is there a fix expected?
I tried moving my photos on a USB FAT32 Stick but still I was unable to sync them with my ipod.
Any help or information will be much appreciated.

Near as I can tell, iTunes DOES NOT like a JPEG with an embedded color profile. I too have been seeing a simliar issue and did some troubleshooting last night to arrive at this conclusion.
Pictures exported from Adobe Lightroom would sync to my iPod Touch via iTunes without any issue. However, Pictures saved from Adobe Photoshop would fail with the error "Some of your photos, including the photo PHOTO_NAME, were not copied to the iPod because they cannot be displayed on your iPod."
This set me to looking at the differences in the JPEGS that Lightroom was creating vs. the ones that Photoshop was creating. I finally arrived on the inclusion of the color profile.
Pictures exported from Lightroom, while converted to the sRGB color space, did not include the profile in the image and sync via iTunes just fine. Photoshop, on the other hand, automatically includes the profile when saving as a JPEG and these pictures WILL NOT sync via iTunes. Even if you tell Photoshop to not include a color profile, it includes a piece of metadata that says the profile is not specified (which is distinctly different from Lightroom which omits the metadata entirely.)
Choosing File|Save for Web... (as opposed to File|Save As...) in Photoshop does not include any color profile (just like exporting from Lightroom) and syncs via iTunes just fine.
I'm very curious to know if the images that you (and others) are having problems sync have, for some reason, a color profile embedded in them. In Windows Explorer, you can right-click on a picture, choose Properties, select the Details tab and look for the Color representation property. My assumption is if it is blank, the picture will sync fine, but if it is anything else it will not sync.
It'd be great to get confirmation from Apple if this is indeed an issue - that JPEGs with embedded color profiles are not sync'd with iTunes. I'm going to do a few more tests today and see, if by chance, including a Mac color space on the image enables it to sync or not.

HP Officejet Pro 8600 Premium will not copy or scan.

Hello,
I have a HP Officejet Pro 8600 Premium that prints just fine however it will not copy or scan. When I attempt to copy a document it displays Starting Copy... on the printer but will not copy and must be turned off and on to use the printer again. When I attempt to scan it brings up an error box telling me to check all of my network connections.
I have already tried the services.msi fix and have ran hp printer and scannor doctor tool to attempt to fix my problem.
In the services.msi I found that all services dependant on (WIA) were already running and set to automatic.
The scan doctor found that It wasn't communicating with the drivers, which I then reinstalled, and restarted the computer. It then continued to have problems with the drivers and asked me to contact support.
Thank you for your time.
edit: The printer is also running the latest firmware and I have also checked my anti-virus firewall so that it is allowing the printer through network. (note: in attempt to fix the issue i have both a usb and network connection trying to get either connection to work).

Hi-
To make sure I understand this correctly, you are unable to do a copy at the device itself? This should function without the device being connected to a PC at all. if this is indeed the case, it sounds as if this is a hardware issue. I would then check with HP support on your product for warranty repair.
I am an HP employee, however, this content reflects my personal opinion and is in no way associated with HP.

Unlimited Indicator not copying to Purchase Order

Hello experts,
I'm running ECC 6.0 and am unable to solve this. I have subcontracting info-records for materials that specify a material to a vendor, pricing, tolerances, etc.
In the Purch. Org 1 screen of info-record view, I can see the tolerances are maintained (5% under and unlimited over-delivery for example). The 5% under is copying when a purchase order is created for the material in question, but the unlimited over-delivery indicator is not copying. If I clear out the indicator and maintain an actual over-delivery tolerance, it copies just fine. Only the indicator is failing to copy from the info-record.
Any familiarity with how to solve this issue?
Kind Regards,
Kelby

Hello Kelby,
Even if nothing is maintained in the material master plant(purchasing view) the unlimited tick should default from the PIR. PIR always has a higher priority than master as it is specific to material+vendor. The help for the 'unlimited' tick in the PIR mentions this.
You can have a look at this note. It is very old and probably not valid for your release. However this is the only note I could find. You should probably raise an OSS message.
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361…

Fixed vendor on PR not copied to PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for