Flash 9 for Linux
I installed the Flash 9 for Linux, and it works!
I'm using Firefox. The first time I fire up Firefox, it's at
Flash version 9 and works perfectly. But when I close Firefox, the
next time it drops back to Flash 7. Does anyone know a fix?
Normally I use Flash under WinTel, but I wanted to experiment a
little. It works great, except I have to install it again after I
close the Firefox browser, because the browser always reverts back
to version 7.
Thanks.
Okay, I found an answer to my own question. ;-) Download the
Adobe Flash plugin. gunzip/tar it. Instead of running the
installer, just copy flashplayer.xpt to path of
/opt/firefox/components/ and copy libflashplayer.so to
/opt/firefox/plugins/. Change /opt/ to wherever Firefox is. Perhaps
the error happened due to permissions, or something like that, but
there was no error message; rather it worked the first time, until
you closed and restarted your web browser.
Similar Messages
-
Security updates for 11.2 Flash Player for Linux?
When attempting to download an update for 11.2 Flash Player for Linux, I saw the note saying that there would be no new development, but security backfixes would continue to be released. I've seen the security warnings for months on my Linux install in Firefox (which is updated) but there does not seem to be a security patch that would stop these "Allow - Continue Blocking" warnings for Flash Player.
When can we expect these to be completed? Linux users may not comprise a large portion of your user base, but the alternatives are extremely expensive hardware and/or software if you want to use an Apple or Microsoft product.I chose "Yum for Linux" and the file that was downloaded was:
adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
I see now that if I select the "rpm for Other Linux" it downloads the flash-player rpm complete with the version info, so perhaps the Yum version is a wrapper. I assumed that since Fedora (and Redhat/etc) uses yum, that I should download the YUM version... in order for it to take effect, I had to perform the following commands after downloading the above rpm:
sudo yum remove adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch
sudo yum localinstall adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
sudo rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux
sudo yum -y install flash-plugin
That allowed me to get the newer version of Flash player to show (and no longer receive the security warnings) but it seems if I had used the Other for Linux download that I wouldn't have had to take those extra steps. I guess we'll find out when the next security update to flash player is released.
Thanks,
-Tim -
Why can't I find Adobe Flash Player for Linux/Firefox 4
I can't figure out how to get Adobe Flash or Shockwave player for Firefox 4. Running Ubuntu 10.04 and when I try to find them in add-ins for FF4 there seems to be nothing. I am not the world's most experienced Linux guy but since Flash and Shockwave are so common it seems curious that they don't have them as add-ins for FF4. Maybe I'm just so far off track on this one it may be the dumbest question anyone has ever asked. But what the heck, you never know the answer if you don't ask the question.
Thanks!There is no flash player for the iphone and Adobe would be the one to develop one, not Apple. And there are no plugins to install instead, as far as I know.
-
Not complaining, just asking - date for flash 8 for Linux?
Hi,
Just wondering if there's a release date/month/year for flash
player 8 for Linux. I'm sure it is incredibly hard to port, blah
blah blah, but in all the software companies I've worked in, I've
had to work to deadlines, and give reasonable estimates. If you
have any vitriolic redneck abuse to add, please do it somewhere
else, I don't want to be associated with you. Thanks :-)
Love, light and peace,
Crispibits.> Why is this version not ready and available?
Because it is non-trivial to port the player code.
> 64-bit processors have been out for quite a while, now!
Yes .. and that is why the port is being done .. but it will
be part of 8.5
(now to be known as Flash Player 9) .. if they ported FP8
then by the time
it was ready.
> The Adobe corporate culture isn't crippling MacroMedia
products, is it?
It has noting to do with Adobe.. this all happened well
before Adobe took
over.
> This is poor marketing and deficient customer service.
I don't see what it has to do with marketing. Is purely
technical. And I
don't see that it is poor customer service either. Indeed,
MM/Adobe are
being quite sensible and responsible about this by making the
port part of
the new FP9 instead of delaying things for all concerned to
get out a FP8
port that would then be immediately out of date.
> Well . . . RealMedia has filled the gap for you!
RealMedia is no where near what Flash does .. its very
simplistic .. and I
wouldn't trust Real as far as I could throw them (which isn't
very far).
Jeckyl -
Adobe Flash Player for Linux 9.0.115
Archlinux faild to Install flashplayer-installer!
After download and extracting the install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz I was trying to Install it.
#su
password:
#sh ./flashplayer-installer
When the Installer ask me where to Install the flash player I give the direction
/opt/mozilla/lib/plugins
but it looks like it doesn't work.
Error not a valid direction.
Anybody have any Idea?Here's a PKGBUILD file, the missing adobe_eula.txt is in the Arch flashplugin CVS
pkgname=flashplugin
pkgver=9.0.115.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Macromedia flash plugin for Netscape/Mozilla (nonfree)"
depends=('mozilla-common' 'libxt' 'gtk2')
replaces=('flashplugin-beta')
url="http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/"
license="custom"
source=(http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
adobe_eula.txt)
arch=('i686')
md5sums=('93b7c48eaa492237b807a3ae1de65cf9' '7d8638844b8be3e841ff29e0162577cb')
build() {
mkdir -p $startdir/pkg/opt/mozilla/lib/plugins
install -m755 $startdir/src/install_flash_player_9_linux/*.so \
$startdir/pkg/opt/mozilla/lib/plugins || return 1
install -D -m644 $startdir/src/adobe_eula.txt \
$startdir/pkg/usr/share/licenses/custom/flashplugin/adobe_eula.txt || return 1 -
Newest Flash version for Linux reported as vulnerable
As in tittle, Firefox blocks use of Flash on every website, Plugin check report it as vulnerable, but Adobe says (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-02.html) that 11.x versions are not vulnerable.
Hi, yes it is vulnerable see February 5, 2015 : https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb15-04.html
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/blocked/p830
go for the Flash Player 11.2.202.442 (Linux) from the next link :
https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html
thank you -
Hello,
i have a little problem with my Flash Player.
I am running the latest Ubuntu with the latest Firefox.
When i go to Websites like Youtube with a lot of flash
content my Firefox locks up.
Do you think this is a Flash or Firefox problem?
A soultion for this would be very nice!
Regards
Jan Payman Ameli
JPA-Software
http://www.jpa-software.dei have this problem 2
but my system is Dibian 4.0 x86_64 edition...
[email protected] -
How install flash player for linux
I need command information for install in linux system !
thankshttp://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/productinfo/instructions/#section-3
-
Standalone flash player for linux full screen?
hi all,
just wondering (as I couldn't find any option in readme file,
help, etc).
If it is possible to launch flashplayer (the standalone linux
version) from command line straight to full screen,
so the presentation plays straight away. Any info would be
appreciated.
thnx,
adami am looking for this too, any ideas?
-
Flash installer for Linux .tar.gz
Hi,
I've downloaded the file install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz from the flash download page. The instructions say:
Click the download link to begin installation. A dialog box will appear asking you where to save the file.
Save the .tar.gz file to your desktop and wait for the file to download completely.
Unpackage the file. A directory called install_flash_player_10_linux will be created.
In terminal, navigate to this directory and type ./flashplayer-installer to run the installer. Click Enter. The installer will instruct you to shut down your browser(s).
However the .tar.gz file only contains a file called libflashplayer.so, no flashplayer-installer script to run. Have I gotten the right file?
Thanks in advance,3gem wrote:
> I gave that a try, but doesn't seem to work on youtube.
Restarted Firefox?
Flash-plugin enabled?
Other websites with flash working?
What do you see on youtube?
- black YouTube screen? or
- no screen at al?
I also have flash not working at all, my guess is flash-plugin
compiled and linked with libraries older than mine. -
64bit Adobe flash player for Linux and BSD
Tinic Uro at Adobe has made a 64bit version but they currently have no plan for a release.
Read more here.From reading through the various links, it looks as if this thing could go into alpha stage sometime soon. Cool.
-
The latest Flash Player for Linux has major version 7. More
and more Websites exist for which version 7 is not sufficient
anymore. Are newer versions of the Flash Player ported to Linux? If
so, does anybody know any release date?> I am not sure that I am a Winger or not,
It doesn't sound like it from the post you jsut made :)
> however I am an Electrical Engineer
> and have my PHD in Engineering and Networks.
> I design and built security system for networks and CCTV
and hold
> three US Patents.
That's nice for you :)
> With that stated, I would like to ask you try Linux and
see what is is to
> be
> in control of your OS, instead of it controlling you.
Personally, I'm quite happy with Windows, and as the software
I develop is
for Windows, and it has al the tools I need for doing that ..
so it makes no
sense for me to use anything else. So I will decline your
invitation, it
really would just be a waste of time for me with my current
job etc.
And for others, such as yourself, Linux can very well be the
better choice
(for the various reasons you outline).
Its all a matter of your requirements and what the various
platforms offer
to meet those requirements.
> Evidently you are a mainstream user, and there is
nothing wrong with that,
> except you speak as if you understand both OS's. It is
evident you do not
> understand why people have dropped Windows and moved on.
to Linux.
I do understand, but it really is irrelevant to the
complaints here. Noone
is saying that Linux is a bad operating system, or that
people should not
use it. Its a personal (or business) decision for what
operating system to
use.
But as part of that decision, one should take into account
that availablilty
of software. If you can get what you want with Linux, that's
great. If
not, then maybe you should look at a platform that DOES
provide it. If
developing flash applications, or visiting Flash-based
websites, is what you
need to be doing, then Linux does not seem the correct
choice.
As an analogy, if you were buying a home entertainment system
that did not
include a provision for a DVD player, and you wanted to play
DVD's, then
your decsion to use that system would not be a good one,
depite how much
better the sound or video quality might be.
Other people (the Linux whingers) do seem to think that,
because they feel
Linux is the best operating system, and that they have chosen
to use it,
that EVERYONE must feel that way, and that all companies
should make their
software for Linux etc etc, and that to no do so is somhow a
bad business
decision and that indicates membership of the secret
anti-linux society that
is headed by Bill Gates etc etc. Really.. people that make
those sort of
claims and complatins are either naive, fanatics, or insecure
in their
decision to use Linux.
> Simply put Linux is a better OS In My Humble and
Educated Opinion
That may well be.
But, again, it is completely irrelevant regarding the
availability of a
Linux version of Flash Player. And certainly irrelevant to
the complaints
that porting to Linux should be trivial and that Adobe are in
some
clandestine arrangement with Microsoft to kill of Linux (or
whatever other
conspiracy theories they seem to have).
If Adobe/Macromedia are wanting to get their Flash platform
onto as many
users computers as possible, then it is sensible to develop
for Windows and
Mac first, and port to less popular (consumer) operating
systems after that.
Especially if they are in the situation of having a codebase
that was not
originally written to be cross-platform (its quite an old
codebase), which
makes porting to other OS non-trivial. Ideally, if Adobe was
starting on
Flash Player completely from scratch, they would certainly
develop it to be
cross-platform from the ground up so porting WOULD then be
trivial. But
that is not the way things are, whinging about it isn't going
to change it.
Anyway .. good luck with Linux, patents etc etc, and I hope
the Flash Player
for Linux platforms works well when finally fully released (I
think its
still in Beta).
Jeckyl -
I have red the article here:
http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/12/flash-player-8-for-linux-update.html
It was written in December 22, 2005.
Till now it is not ready?!
Apple ported MacOSx to Intel faster than Adobe ports Flash
Player to Linux....
Very hard to believe. It seems like nobody works on player8
for linux. :(bobromeo,
> There's now Flash 9 for Linux and I installed it on
Ubuntu
> 6.10 (Edgy). But it only works for FireFox, Opera is not
> yet supported !#$@!%#@! Is this so hard to do ?
I guess it is! ;)
David Stiller
Adobe Community Expert
Dev blog,
http://www.quip.net/blog/
"Luck is the residue of good design." -
Flash player for small linux device
Hi forum,
I'm working with small linux devices and I'm having a very
decent restriction on the Compactflash / harddisk size. Is there a
small stand-alone flash player for linux which plays at least
Flash4? The player should have less than 1.5 MB in size. Therefore
flash player 9 from adobe is not an option.
I've tried the stand alone player version 6 from adobe, but
this player is too much buggy on the linux basis we use.
Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated.
Kind regards.Hi, I'm not familiar with Linux, but this link has the system requirements for Flash Player 9.
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/productinfo/systemreqs/flashplayer9/
Flash Player is a browser plug in and works thru your browser, so check and see what browser and version is needed for FP version 9.
It appears that Flash Player 8 is not supported for Linux, at least it wasn't listed.
eidnolb -
Any ETA on Flash 10 for Windows 64 bit browsers?
With the release of Windows 7 just 3 months away, I'm hoping that Adobe is close to at least a beta version of Flash 10 for 64 bit browsers. I know they've released the Flash 10 for Linux 64 bit platforms, but they seem to be behind on this. Windows is the most used operating system in the world. Why we have yet to see a 64 bit flash player for it is kind of ... pathetic? I don't know.
I do not wish to point out the obvious but someone at Adobe should be monituring current market/tech trends. Most new PC's are shipping with 64 bit systems in order to take advantage of the larger amounts of memory available to consumers today. This trend has not occurred overnight!!! It has been coming for years. I believe that if the flash player had serious competition Adobe would have been developing this from day one...that pesky "first to market" rule just does not apply to the flash player - pity! Question remains....how will investors view this?
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi All, I am unable to open the workspace url ...it gives these error Error Message in Mozila Not Found The requested URL /workspace/index.jsp was not found on this server. Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.3.1.0 Oracle-HTTP-Server Server at hyperio
-
I'm trying to Set up Internet Email address but it's impossible. I received message: "Bad Gateway The gateway revived an invalid response from the server when attempting to fulfill your request." I have T-mobile but my phone originally was from At&T.
-
What do they mean Early Mac? about graphic card update.
What do they mean Early Mac? I want to buy ati radeon hd 4870. I bought this machine and I can not find the papers anymore. Model Name: Mac Pro Model Identifier: MacPro1,1 Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor Speed: 2 GHz Number Of Processo
-
Lynx: Wireless is Really Weak
I just bought a IdeaTab K3011W Lynx 11.6" wireless tablet and I noticed that the wireless reception is extremely poor. I have to get next to the router just to get the occasional three bars. Does anyone else have this issue or any suggestions. I a
-
i try to bootcamp my mac but always i musr re-install mac os and i lost every thing like serial number of software which pay does it work really? because it's very expensive apple and doesn't work....