Flash animation consume 90-95% memory usage

Hi,
http://ww3.virtualvox.com/jyoti/option1/
please check the url above.....
i have used the dropdown menu in "About Us" and "Product"
links...
and the effect of dropdown menu is being very slow......bcoz
of middle flash....
when i removed the flash the dropdown menu working fine...
bcoz the middle flash animation consume upto 90-95% of memory
usage of PC...
middle animation is very simple nothing extra ordinary in
that animation....
than why it consume full memory .... and why that JS menu
being slow....to open
please give me some suggetion for flash animation so that it
doesn;t consume full memory and JS menu working smoothly
Thanks

You are making your life miserable by bouncing your database every now and again. Rather then analyzing your SGA and other things to look out for performance bottelneck, you prefer to bounce your database to, which seems to be temporary solution. Since I don't have enough information to offer suggestions,
I would ask you run a statspack report for no more then 20 minutes when you feel the performnce at it's worst and analyze it for perfromnce bottelnecks.
hare krishna
Alok

Similar Messages

Flash 8 Application consuming lots of Memory!!

Hi There,
I just developed an Application using Flash 8 Professional.
Unfortunately Im finding a bad memory usage when i run the
Application. Visual Studio acts as the container for the SWF. The
memory usage rises upto 80% and its really not acceptable.
The application is an e-learning software with heavy graphics
and animations. Is it because I have a lot of images and
animations? because in the code I just have a maximum of 12 sound
objects, which I have not deleted upon exit. Sould I optimize the
code used? I mean the parts that involves "=new object( )"?
If the problem is with graphics, is there any alternate way
to adjust it?

you aren't going to get too much help without someone looking
at your project.
however, if your movieclips remain stationary on-stage or
only change their _x and _y properties, you can enable their
cacheAsBitmap properties and realize a substantial performance
benefit.

Some questions about the limit of memory usage of Adobe flash player in different OS & Web Browser

Hi Adobe experts,
I'm from HP, and now using Adobe flash player making some products about massive data displaying.
For my target, I need to show more than 200 K rows in client web browser, using AdvancedDataGrid.
And that may needs more than 200M to cache the data in Web browser memory space.
So, my questions are:
Does there any memory usage limit in flash player?
Say, if we have 4G bytes of physical memory in machine, in Windows, how much can I use in flash player?
Also, if we have 4G bytes of physical memory in Linux, how much can I use in flash player?
Does it depends on the Web Browser?
Say, is there any difference between different web browsers?
If the limit exists, can we control the limit?
Say, can we define some parameters in the tag in web page to expand the limitation?
Or, can we try to control this limitation by the Flash player management which exists in the Windows Control Panel?
Best Regards
Huang Haixu
+86 18616735091
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

1. Yes. The Toolkit for CreateJS is an extra downloadable extension for Flash CS6. It will publish html and js files that will provide the animation instead of the swf that you would normally publish. The success or failure of the resulting javascript version of your animation is the result of working within the constraints of the toolkit. You are pretty much constrained to using the timeline in Flash for your animations. If you work only in Actionscript, then the output will be very disappointing.
2. Edge outputs javascript, css, and html to give you an animation. The user interface allows you to design within the constraints of what Edge can do. You can preview and adjust and tweek your animation as you work. Edge is an html5 tool. It can create html5 animation. It is not a replacement for Flash. It is something that you can use instead of Flash to embed animation in html.
The problems and benefits of each are unique. Neither is a good substitute to learning javascript, css and html5. If you don't understand the code that is created from each of these tools, you can easily end up with huge, bloated, files that perform poorly. I'm very biased toward actually knowing what is going on. If I need to edit something, I want to be able to go into the code and make a change, not add an additional chunk of code to work around what was there. I don't use the timeline at all, and so nothing that I have will publish using CreateJS. Well, it will publish, but nothing happens because there is nothing on the timeline to translate.
You can download a trial of Flash CS6 and try the Toolkit for yourself. Edge is still in free preview, you can get a copy at http://labs.adobe.com and try it to see how it works.
Also, if you're not using the Greensock Animation Platform with Flash, have a look at that. It has recently been extended to provide Javascript analogues for most of the Libraries. http://www.greensock.com/

Flash builder 4.7 consuming lot of memory in VMware VDI environment.

Flash builder 4.7 consuming lot of memory in VMware VDI environment. When we debugg the application then it is throwing out of memory exception. We need to close and relaunch Flash builder IDE numerous times. Can you please help us with setting changes we need to make for flash builder or VMware VDI environment so that we can resolve this issue?

Hi Atul_Saini,
So I checked your link and all seems correct on my computer.
At the bottom of the link you provided there is "see also" section, about activation / deactivation.
I did not deactivated my licenses before my window re-install, and if now I go to Flash Builder -> Help , desactivation button is greyed out. Could it be the source of my problem that I used my licenses on two computer and did not deactivated them ?
If yes, how could I deactivate thoses products ? I searched on my profile but I can't find a way to do it.

S.o.s. how to set a memory usage limit in flash cs4?

flash is using 1 200 000 k. and i cant work in this situation. i know that i can limit the usage of memory in ps cs4. but i dont know how i do it in flash. is there a way of limiting the memory usage or making flash use memory as much as this?

Thats all my poblems!!!
I used File Monitors from Sysinternals and I see, that Flash operated with C:\xalan\xercesImpl.jar (on my system), and can't find C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash CS4\META-INF\services\org.apache.xerces.xni.parser.XMLParserConfiguration and others...
I temporary remove xalan - well - thats all - CS4 successfully compile, test, check codes !!!
1) Adobe CS4 used Xerces Apache (and configurated himself, without us)
2) Use Sysinternals to detect other file-problems
On my machine Flash 8, CS3, CS4 - for adjusting project compatibility.
==========
PS. Читает то, что попалось первым
ENVIRONMENT > CLASSPATH:
.;C:\xalan\xalan.jar;C:\xalan\serializer.jar;C:\CODE\xalan-j\xml-apis.jar;C:\xalan\xercesI mpl.jar;%CLASSPATH%;C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\lib\ext\QTJava.zip
Ну нравится Макромедиа-Адоб Флэш...

Flash player memory usage Safari 5.1.7; OS X 10.7.4

I've heard quite a bit about the relationship between Apple and Flash but since getting my laptop I've noticed that the two aren't getting along. While browsing the web (±4 tabs, 2 with music playing on youtube) I realised that my brand spanking new MBP was freezing up on me. I checked the activity monitor and noticed that I only had 18mb of RAM free, after checking the processes I found flash player was the culprit.
It was using a whopping 900+mb of RAM which is almost a fourth of the available memory. I closed the rest of my applications and freed up another 300mb but within about 5 minutes flash player had eaten up all of that as well. I'm not sure if this is considered a memory leak but I am pretty sure that this is not normal.
Any suggestions? My friend who uses Firefox also said he was facing the same problem, so I don't know if switching browser will help.
- Camel

I am having difficulty reproducing my trader desktop result using the blazeds sample application. So either I was mistaken, or perhaps I have a newer version than what I tested with originally.
I can reproduce the issue with our Flex application on the latest release of the flash player. Using chrome and 11.3.300.262 there is a noted increase in memory utilization of between 50-100MB/hour. This is a real time messaging dashboard application that constantly updates prices displayed in charts and tickers using Adobe messaging.
On 11.2.2.144 on the same installation of chrome this application reaches an initial memory utilization and then stays at or close to that memory level indefinitely - though memory usage will increase slightly as more and more data points are added to the charts displayed - nothing like 50-100MB/hour.
I would need to give your people access to our application as it's not publicly accessible. So again, please contact me - flashbug at vanderberg.fastmail.fm to arrange those details.

When opening an animated gif, lots of memory consumed followed by crash

Any large (read: anything more than a megabyte) animated GIF causes Firefox to consume all available memory, and then subsequently, crash.
I've tried the following:
- Disable all extensions
- Disable hardware acceleration
- Run in safemode
- New Firefox installation
- Set affinity of Firefox to only use one core
With no effect.
I am a long time Firefox user and enthusiast, but I am really considering making the transition to Chrome (which does not crash with long animated GIFs)
There is no option to submit a crash report about it, and there is also no crash reports on my local system AT ALL.
The following is a short video demonstrating the memory leak.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIS8baOSwJ0&feature=youtu.be

After some further reading, I set the preference image.mem.decodeondraw=false in about:config. Firefox struggled with the GIF, not always able to display anything useful in the window, but did not crash. Clicking the Home button to navigate the tab away allowed Firefox to unload memory. Not an improvement, really.
Doing a little more searching, I discovered that the file you linked was the demo for this yet-to-be-fixed bug: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523950 523950 – Long animated GIF makes Firefox consume all available memory].
It's generally not helpful to add comments to bugs (unless you can help fix them), but you can register on the Bugzilla site and "vote" for them to be fixed. See:
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html Bugzilla Etiquette]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=voting.html Voting]

Eclipse with flash builder 4 plugin consume the whole memory after several builds

Hi,
we have installed eclipse flash builder 4 plugin on eclipse 3.5.2 on Mac OS 10.6.
We experience problem with memory leak using flash builder plugin 4.
When we build flash project several times, then we see that eclipse consume more and more in time and at the end it looks like that eclipse consume all available memory. When there is no free memory, then system start to swap and we need to restart, because everything is going to be slow when swaping starts.
Any suggestions how to solve this problem?
I suppose that other people also have this problem. I will be realy happy if someone share his experience to fix this.
We uses java 1.5.
Thanks in advanced!

Ok, problem solved.
First I uninstalled the flash builder plugin, and eclipse galileo was still not starting.
Then I uninstalled java (both jre/jdk, v6.20).
Crossing my fingers, I reinstalled jdk and then jre (latest downloaded); and eclipse ran again (pheeeew!).
Finally, I installed flash builder 4 plugin again, it works too (!), and aptana works, ... all is working back again, fine!

Flash animation - reducing CPU usage

I made a Flash animation with Actionscript (changing alpha
value with timer etc. etc.). But on slower PCs it eats pretty much
CPU unfortunately. Is it possible to somehow convert this movie
into some series of images or something? Or to somehow "capture"
movie into barebone movie with no graphic calculations to make it
fast on slow PCs?
Thank you for advices!

How can I convert scripted animation to some sort of timeline
animation which don't require so much CPU calculations?

Reducing CPU usage of Flash animation

Hello!
I have a simple Flash animation - fading in and out different
images. I have done it with an Actionscript (changing alpha value).
That worked ok only on new processors - on all others it eats 100%
CPU. I then tried to do it with timeline (motion tween between 2
alpha values of picture). Now it is considerably better, but on
CPUs lower than 2 GHz it still eats 100% CPU. Size of animation is
940x160. How can I do this fading correctly so that CPU will not
have to do so much calculations?? Please help me!

sent too soon - TINT to the solid white background - always
avoid alpha whenever possible as flash
will have to calculate the difference in colors throughout
the tween - Tinting is far more processor
friendly.
Chris Georgenes / mudbubble.com / keyframer.com / Adobe
Community Expert
Chris Georgenes wrote:
> use TINT tweens instead of Alpha.
>
> Chris Georgenes / mudbubble.com / keyframer.com / Adobe
Community Expert
>
>
> Tiansen wrote:
>
>> I uploaded banner animation at
http://www.process.si/banner-slo.swf.
I
>> dont use any class with it now because it is done
entirely with
>> timeline and motion tween between two images with
different alpha
>> value. It is only a sample of what I try to achieve.
If I understand
>> you correctly, roozbeh, you suggested to use white
rectangle and
>> adjust alpha value of that rectangle. Why is that
better than changing
>> alpha of original image?
>> I also noticed that size of animation does matter!
If you put some
>> program, i.e. task manager over a part of animation
it eats
>> significantly less CPU. It depends on percentage of
animation area
>> covered.
>>

Excessive memory usage with FireFox 3.6.8

Is it normal for the total memory footprint of FireFox.exe and Plugin-Container.exe to be 1.14GB (488MB and 651MB respectively)?
When first opening FireFox, it's footprint is approx 30MB, but inexorably creeps upward as I browse (typically YouTube/Hulu/4chan/GMail), consuming nearly 60% of total system memory before performance loss demands a browser restart.
Is there any workaround or update/patch or command-line argument that will cap memory usage? Will rolling back to an earlier version of FF solve the problem, or is it a problem with Flash? Any advice would be appreciated.

This is caused by the Flag Fox add-on, you can either disable or uninstall it.
# Open the add-ons manager - in the menus select Tools, then Add-ons
# In the add-ons manager go to the Extensions panel
# In the list of add-ons click on Flag Fox to select it, then either click on the Disable or Uninstall button
# Re-start Firefox to complete the process
Do you have Personas Plus 1.6 installed? If you do try disabling that one instead, it has been causing problems with add-ons.

How to monitor memory usage of "Memory-based Snapshot" executable (MRCNSP) in Linux?

We have noticed in the past that MRCNSP/Memory-based Snapshot program executable consumes around 3.8 GB of memory on the linux VM. I understand that value change planning is 32 bit executable so 4 GB is the limit. I want to monitor the memory usage of the executable when the program runs. The program usually runs overnight. I wanted to check with you experts if you have any MRP executable memory usage monitoring script that I could use.
I found the metalink note OS Environment and Compile Settings for Value Chain and MRP/Supply Chain Planning Applications (Doc ID 1085614.1) which talks about "top -d60 >>$HOME/top.txt". Please share your ideas for monitoring this process.
We do not use Demand Planning or Demanta or Advanced Supply Chain Planning which are 64 bit application. That is our future direction.
Environment:
EBS : R12.1.2 on Linux. The concurrent manager is on 64 bit linux VM, web services on 32 bit VMs.
DB: Oracle DB 11.2.0.3 on HP UX Itanium 11.31. Single database instance.
Thanks
Cherrish Vaidiyan

RAM on the controller is not the same as the C: drive. With respect to the controller, you can think of it in the same terms as your computer. RAM is volatile memory and your C: drive is non volatile flash memory.
Depending on the frequency of the temperature excursions above and below your 70C threshold, the service life of the controller and the method you used to append to the file, there could be a number of issues that may creep up over time.
The first, and the one you brought up is the size of the file over time. Left unchecked this file could grow continuously until the system literally runs out of flash memory space and chokes. Depending on how your are appending data to this file, you could also use more than a trivial slice of processor time to read and write this big file on disk. While I have not personally ever run one of the RT controllers out of "disk space", I can't imagine that any good could come of that.
One thought is to keep a rolling history of say the last 3 months. Each month, start a new file and append your data to it during the course of the month. Each time a new file is created, delete the data file from something like 3 months ago. This will ensure that you will always have the last 3 months of history on the system, however the monthly deletion of the oldest data file will limit you to say 3 files at whatever size they happen to be. Unless there are hundreds of thousands of transitions above and below your threshold this should keep you in good shape.
I also eluded to the method you use to write to this file. I would ensure that you are appending data using the actual file functions and not first reading in the file, appending your data as a string then writing the entire file contents back to disk. In addition to causing the highest load on the file system this method also has the largest system RAM requirements.

Flex3 Vector Graph Memory Usage Estimation

Dear Sirs,
I want to know when I using Flex3 graphics to draw rectangles, how will it consume the memory.
For example, I have a code like this
for (var outer:int = 0; outer < 25; outer ++){
var canv:Canvas = new Canvas();
canv.width = 100;
canv.height = 100;
for (var i:int = 0; i < 100; i ++){
for (var j:int = 0; j < 100 ; j++) {
canv.drawRect(i,j,1,1);
this.addchild(canv);
var p:Point = new Point(int(outer/5) * 105, (outer%5)*105);
canv.move(p);
I assume that each vector graph object would cost 68 bytes
68 bytes comes from my “assumption” from following attributes of each vector graph object
x: Number
y: Number
width: Number
height: Number
color: 8 bytes
alpha: 8 bytes
object overhead: 20 bytes
And I assume it display on GUI would cost 8 bytes each pixel
total = 76 bytes
Therefore, each Canvas display container would display 10000 rectangles which cost less than 1 MB.
For 25 Canvases, there would be 25 MB cost for graphs.
Now, I add other factors:
Browser: 25MB
Flex Container + 25 Canvas Containers: 10 MB (or less)
Then it totally should cost 60 MB.
But in my test, this case would cost 150MB !!??
I am confusing why there are so much extra memory cost?
Anyone knows the exact formula to estimate vector graph memory usage?
Futhermore, I have try using bitmapdata and bitmap to display my graph, but it’s not what I want, I actually need the vector graph features since my graph need to be zoomed.

It is much more complex than that, and your estimates are not quite correct.
I don't think there is 64-bit color in Flash. You can read up on how the
Flash Player manages memory. You might be seeing 150MB but you might have
sparsely populated memory pages.

Upgrading to FF 27 created huge (~1 GB/hr) memory usage for iconified windows on Mac 10.8

Here is what I know about the problem:
- Two different Macs (10.8.x, 10.9.x) with 32 GB RAM ran out of system swap due to the size of the Firefox process growing to over 20 GB, and both machines had virtually idle CPUs with no Firefox usage whatsoever - they were unattended
- It occurred immediately after upgrading from Firefox 26 to 27.0.1
- The set of pages, tabs, windows was the same before and after upgrading
- There does not seem to be a single identifiable URL that causes the problem, but opening a window with this URL and then iconifying it causes memory to be leaked at a substantial rate (at least on one OS X 10.8.5 machine)
- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163744.aspx
- I normally have ~25 tabs distributed across ~8 windows, all of which but one are iconified
- Memory is consumed at the staggering rate of ~1 GB/hour while the offensive window is iconified
- Memory is not leaked per-se - about:memory confirms that heap-unclassified memory is growing rapidly, but as soon as the offending window is opened and no longer iconified, the memory usage immediately drops back to the normal ~1 GB or so - this is also verifiable in Activity Monitor.app, etc
- The problem occurs in safe mode, but regardless the only plugins installed are Shockwave Flash, QuickTime, and Java Applet
- I have killed Firefox repeatedly and can recreate the same memory usage pattern
- I have at least one Mac, however, on which trying to reproduce this does nothing
- I've already spent hours trying to determine even the initial cause of this

Another user was talking about this issue on the forum and created a bug report.
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=973776 Bug 973776 - Memory leak in Firefox 27.0.1 ]
You can create another bug report or add your details into this report.

Problem with Firefox and very heavy memory usage

For several releases now, Firefox has been particularly heavy on memory usage. With its most recent version, with a single browser instance and only one tab, Firefox consumes more memory that any other application running on my Windows PC. The memory footprint grows significantly as I open additional tabs, getting to almost 1GB when there are 7 or 8 tabs open. This is as true with no extensions or pluggins, and with the usual set, (firebug, fire cookie, fireshot, XMarks). Right now, with 2 tabs, the memory is at 217,128K and climbing, CPU is between 0.2 and 1.5%.
I have read dozens of threads providing "helpful" suggestions, and tried any that seem reasonable. But like most others who experience Firebug's memory problems, none address the issue.
Firefox is an excellent tool for web developers, and I rely on it heavily, but have now resorted to using Chrome as the default and only open Firefox when I must, in order to test or debug a page.
Is there no hope of resolving this problem? So far, from responses to other similar threads, the response has been to deny any responsibility and blame extensions and/or pluggins. This is not helpful and not accurate. Will Firefox accept ownership for this problem and try to address it properly, or must we continue to suffer for your failings?

55%, it's still 1.6Gb....there shouldn't be a problem scanning something that it says will take up 300Mb, then actually only takes up 70Mb.
And not wrong, it obviously isn't releasing the memory when other applications need it because it doesn't, I have to close PS before it will release it. Yes, it probably is supposed to release it, but it isn't.
Thank you for your answer (even if it did appear to me to be a bit rude/shouty, perhaps something more polite than "Wrong!" next time) but I'm sitting at my computer, and I can see what is using how much memory and when, you can't.

Flash animation consume 90-95% memory usage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for