Flash Display size on various monitor sizes

I'm creating an flash interactive that will be view several different monitor sizes. What's a safe or standard size (resolution) to create the flash movie.
Thanks for any response.

You should use whatever size fits comfortably in the browser on the smallest screen. Do you have any idea what size screen resolutions your users will be using?

Similar Messages

Windows 8.1 forgets dpi / display size settings for one monitor on almost every reboot

I use TV 32" with 1920x1080 and cintiq 13" with 1920x1080
when I boot my PC the resolution is fine but DPI is wrong.
In smaller monitor It's look like DPI is higher than the bigger one.
I already set dpi to be the same (smallest 100%) but it's not work until I do something to change display setting.
It's really annoy me. This problem is not happen when I use windows 8
Only solution I found is turn off
"Turn on fast start-up".
When I do that It's boot like what I want. every monitor is the same DPI.
But it'll make my boot time longer.
It should be just start up windows and use the same dpi from the start.
So I think this problem is a bug in windows 8.1
Best regards

Thank you for reply.
I've already used the latest graphic card driver. But It's won't help this issue.
In registry editor. I check those variables then value of them is already set like that blog suggest.
So , it look like when windows start-up(with fast start-up) It use something like
suggest value for different monitor size instead of what I set in control panel. But when I turn off fast start-up windows use my setting value.
And I think there are a lot of people who got the same problem as me.
Here is an example.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-desktop/windows-81-forgets-dpi-display-size-settings-for/385cb615-d699-47f8-8c12-717e3364c866

My next iMac-- which graphics card; which display size?

Hi all,
I'd like some advice in choosing my next iMac, specifically regarding the graphics card and the display size.
Graphics Card:
I'm not a gamer nor am I doing any 3D animation. Is there any other reason to upgrade the graphics card? I DO want the best possible video playback (QT movies), but I don't know if the graphics card has any bearing on video playback quality.
Display size:
Aside from the obvious differences in resolution, do any of the three displays sizes (17,20,24) have any history of being better or more reliable?
Thanks in advance for any tips

Your needs will better dictate which model is best.
Video playback of QuickTine movies will not be affected by upgrading to the 24" with the nVidia chip.
No 3D gaming or animation means no need for a higher end graphics card. In my case, the x1600 ATi in the original Core Duo 20" is more than sufficient for everything I've thrown at it so far including full resolution "Call of Duty".
For your use, you may not need the extra VRAM but I personally would bump it up to 256MB though. Adding an external monitor will split the total VRAM between the two monitors and with Apple continually moving a lot of Mac OS X's graphical features to the GPU, the extra memory may be a blessing.
Display Size:
I believe that reliability between the three models is pretty much the same.
The advantage to the 24" is, of course, the extra screen real estate and resolution. However The price difference between the 20" and 24" could allow you to go with the 20" model and add an external LCD for a dual screen setup (if space permits).
Weigh your needs - now and the immediate future - and then look at both models in person if possible.

How to set a uniform display size of multiple intermedia image types - wher

I have read "If you want to limit the size of the file that can be uploaded, you can do this as a post generation
step, by adding the maxFileSize property to the <controller> element in the struts-config:
This does not address how to limit the *** display size *** where you have multiple intermedia image types - where the original size is not uniform.
If an image is uploaded where the true image display size is 1024 x 768 - it will display that way in the table/table-form. This will create un-even display size's where previous images sizes where different 384 x 384 and so on.
Is there a way to encode the display size so that *** ALL *** images regardless of their true size are displayed uniformly at least on one dimension (64 x ???)? This is possible when using products such as Dreamweaver or Flash.
BTW - JHS/***JDev*** synergy is truely magnificient!!! Way-To-Go Oracle!!!!!!!!!!! Keep it up!!!!
BG...

Bill,
I did some tests, and was able to reproduce it. The problem is that JHeadstart distinguishes between display types fileDownload and image, but UIX uses the same <media> tag to handle both display types. It will look at runtime whether it must render a hyperlink to download the document, or to render it right away as an image.
To get all images the same size, you can set the display width and height, AND the display type must be set to image.
However, to get the file name used as download link, you must set the FileName attribute AND the display type must be set to "fileDownload" ..
So, to solve your problem, it is easiest to set the displayType to "fileDownload" and set the width and height properties post-generation in the generated UIX page.
In the next release of Jheadstart, we will fix this, and always pick up width, height and fileName settings regardless of the display type.
Note that you should also set the FileName property against the attribute you are using to upload the file.
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Setting Display Size in X

Connecting a laptop to a new 42" Panasonic monitor (TC-L42E60), I found
the display to be blurry.
xrandr shows this line:
HDMI2 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
Use the same hardware, on my co-worker's older 42" monitor, I see:
HDMI2 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 930mm x 520mm
A physical size of 698mm x 392mm is closer to 32". I assume there is a
problem with the monitor's EDID (the monitor's firmware is up to date).
Does anyone know how to manually set the physical size? I fiddled
around with 'xrandr --fbmm' but to no avail.

Before making changes, I see these two lines in the output of xrandr:
LVDS1 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 277mm x 156mm
HDMI2 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
And this information from Xorg.log:
$ grep monitor /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[225833.747] (**) | |-->Monitor "<default monitor>"
[225833.747] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[225833.763] (II) intel(0): Output LVDS1 has no monitor section
[225833.763] (II) intel(0): Output VGA1 has no monitor section
[225834.294] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI1 has no monitor section
[225834.334] (II) intel(0): Output DP1 has no monitor section
[225834.579] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI2 has no monitor section
[225834.602] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI3 has no monitor section
[225834.640] (II) intel(0): Output DP2 has no monitor section
[225834.680] (II) intel(0): Output DP3 has no monitor section
[225835.499] (II) intel(0): Monitor name: Panasonic-TV
I then created this file:
$ vim /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/90-monitor.conf
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "<default monitor>"
DisplaySize 930 520 # In millimeters
EndSection
I now see this in Xorg.log:
$ grep monitor /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[226022.950] (**) | |-->Monitor "<default monitor>"
[226022.951] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[226022.962] (II) intel(0): Output LVDS1 using monitor section <default monitor>
[226022.963] (II) intel(0): Output VGA1 has no monitor section
[226023.494] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI1 has no monitor section
[226023.534] (II) intel(0): Output DP1 has no monitor section
[226023.779] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI2 has no monitor section
[226023.802] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI3 has no monitor section
[226023.840] (II) intel(0): Output DP2 has no monitor section
[226023.880] (II) intel(0): Output DP3 has no monitor section
[226024.699] (II) intel(0): Monitor name: Panasonic-TV
But in the output of xrandr, I see no change to the display size:
LVDS1 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 277mm x 156mm
HDMI2 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
I understand my laptop screen is LVDS1 but I was hoping to see have a
display size of 930mm x 520mm.
1) Does anyone know how to define HDMI2 in
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/90-monitor.conf ?
2) Does anyone know how to override the DisplaySize?
Maybe if I get '1' to work, '2' will follow, but I figured I'd ask.
-steve

Wrong ibook display size

to the forum:
I just purchased a second hand ibook. It came
with Tiger installed and no original system disks.
(The CPU is a 700 MHz PowerPCG3 and there is 640MB
of ram) Although I didn't do much with the machine
under Tiger, everything seemed to be working fine.
In particular, the whole ibook screen was used.
I got the original system disks from Apple and
proceeded with Software Restore. That erased Tiger
and replaced it with earlier system software.
I can boot into system 9 and system 10, BUT
the display (under both systems) is about the size
of the 1984 mac display (surrounded by a large black
border). Otherwise everything is working.
In system 9, the system profiler shows the
display card leading to display(2) which
has a screen size of 640 by 480. The monitor
panel in the control strip shows the
same thing along with "color LCD (1) 1024 by 768".
I don't know why two displays are shown.
In system 10, I can't find anything about the
display size, but it may be at the bottom
of a window I can't see (because of small screen).
Any help would be much appreciated.
Roger Purves
PowerMac G4 1.25 GHz Mac OS X (10.2.x)

You're Welcome Roger!
"... the 10.2.8 combo did help. In OS X 10.2.8, the display is now the right size."
Yippee!
"... booting into System 9 still leads to the small display. Perhaps I should start a new topic in the System 9 forum."
It's been so long since I used OS 9, I couldn't even begin to troubleshoot it!
You're correct, there are some very knowledgeable members in the OS 9 forum, but eww has a handle on it here too.
"...you are running 10.3.9 and 9.2.2 on one of your machines. Can you boot into 9 on that machine? And does Classic run also?"
Yes and yes. But I can't remember the last time I booted into OS 9, or started Classic.
I'm a total OS X junkie. After installing Panther 10.3.x, I never looked back!
I'll take the liberty of anticipating your next question though
My HD is not partitioned.
And Thank You, for extending the courtesy, of awarding in Discussions, as this is not a requirement, nor mandatory, but is much appreciated!
ali b

Photo Display Size

Can someone please tell me exactly where to set the true display size for photos/pictures on my Photoshop Elements 8 ??
Things so far are displayed much smaller than the actual size. I have used Adobe Photoshop for years and still SO much I do not know. Am fairly new to PSE. I am used to clicking "View" and then "Print Size" to see something in it's actual size, but this is not working. For instance, I now have a 12" wide photo up and it is displayed at 8 1/4 in. wide. Surely there is a setting somewhere which I need to correct?
Thanks :-)
tejas_me

Try clicking the print size button.
Also if you drag out the tabbed image window you can position it where you want and then click on the bottom right corner to drag the window to a larger size. I find this useful when viewing 1:1 whilst keeping the tools pallet visible on the left. Give it a try.
I think you maybe overlooking resolution which affects the pixel size but not the dimension size. For example you can have an 8 x 10 photo for printing at 200ppi, 240ppi or 300ppi. They will all print at 8 x 10 but at differing quality.
You can try this for yourself by clicking Image à Resize à Image Size
In the dialog that opens keep the resample image and constrain proportions boxes checked then experiment by typing differing resolutions into the document size box. See how the pixel dimensions change even though the document dimensions remain at 8 x 10.
Elements will always display the optimum number of pixels that it can depending on your monitor size, which means that only 25%, 50%, 75% etc. may fill the screen.

Trying to make a flex application scalable in its display size by using a "Host-swf" - Problem

We created a flex application using Flex 3. What we are
trying to do is to make this application scalable in its display
size. That means we want the application to scale itself to exactly
fit the size of the browser window without using a scrollbar like
normal Flash-swfs do. Sadly flex application don't scale like a
normal flash swf.
To get a workaround for this we created a so called
"Host-swf" with flash CS3. This Host-swf loads the flex application
and adds it as a child. And voila: When calling the Host-swf our
application can scale.
We used this code to achive this:
var oUrlRequest:URLRequest = new
URLRequest("Flex-Application.swf");
var oURLLoader:Loader = new Loader();
oURLLoader.load(oUrlRequest);
addChild(oURLLoader);
This works perfectly as long the browser window is larger
then the resolution of the host-swf (900*600) when calling the url
for the application:
Picture showing the
scaling
But it doesnt't work out when the browser window is smaller
than 900*600. The application is then shown with a scrollbar, and
when resizing the browser window the scrollbar is still there:
Picture showing the
application with scrollbar
Maybe anyone already tried to achive the same thing and has a
different solution for us?
Thank you in advance!

"noby_95" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:gpsue6$rhh$[email protected]..
> We created a flex application using Flex 3. What we are
trying to do is to
> make
> this application scalable in its display size. That
means we want the
> application to scale itself to exactly fit the size of
the browser window
> without using a scrollbar like normal Flash-swfs do.
Sadly flex
> application
> don't scale like a normal flash swf.
>
> To get a workaround for this we created a so called
"Host-swf" with flash
> CS3.
> This Host-swf loads the flex application and adds it as
a child. And
> voila:
> When calling the Host-swf our application can scale.
>
> We used this code to achive this:
>
>
> --------------------------
> var oUrlRequest:URLRequest = new
URLRequest("Flex-Application.swf");
> var oURLLoader:Loader = new Loader();
> oURLLoader.load(oUrlRequest);
> addChild(oURLLoader);
>
>
> -------------------------
>
> This works perfectly as long the browser window is
larger then the
> resolution
> of the host-swf (900*600) when calling the url for the
application:
>
http://www.gansl-online.de/Bild1.jpg
>
> But it doesnt't work out when the browser window is
smaller than 900*600.
> The
> application is then shown with a scrollbar, and when
resizing the browser
> window the scrollbar is still there:
>
http://www.gansl-online.de/Bild2.jpg
>
> Maybe anyone already tried to achive the same thing and
has a different
> solution for us?
When I set the Application width and height to a percentage
number, it will
change its size based on the size of the window.

VNC/Remote Management display size setting?

I'm not sure the best place to ask this question, it has several different components involved in it. I've looked all over but can't seem to find any info on this.
I've got a headless Mini running 10.5.1. When I use a VNC client or now "Share Screen" to it, it comes up with a screen size of 1680 x 1050. Back when it was running Tiger it was something smaller (but can't remember what it was right now).
Question is... how is this size set and is it changeable?
Thanks,
Rich

Sorry, I guess I should have been more specific, how do you set it to other display sizes besides the ones that are listed in Sys Prefs? What if I want to make it bigger than 1860 x1050 (which is the biggest listed)? I'm connecting from a Mac that has a 30" display, so what if I want to make it closer to that display's size, which is 2560 x 1600? How was 1680 x 1050 even picked in the first place? I do not have a monitor attached at all, let alone that size.

Read flash movie size from file

hi,
does anybody know how i can read the display size of a flash movie (i can access the movie thru an input stream)? i know flash doesn't have a fixed size but i'm pretty sure it should have something like a default size though.
thakns for help,
marco

You could parse the HTML the flash file is shown in and get it's size.
But I looked through a Flash 4 file I have, and I don't find the size that I know I designed it to be written anywhere in it. It was a quick run-through of the file, though, so I could be wrong. But it would make sense since it's essentially vector graphics, so size isn't important.

Controlling Display size

I have created a Flash swf movie and I want to control the
display size for the display on the output. If a user stretches the
viewer frame all the work area on the sides displays. The view size
I want to display at is 550 X400. Any help with this would be
appreciated.

There is no way to do this that I'm aware of. The TOC and
index are linked together in HTML Help and in any case the tri-pane
can't be moved from the left.

In previous versions of Firefox I was able increase the display size on Flickr which remained unless I altered it again. Does any one know how to do this on Firefox 4?

Question
In previous versions of Firefox I was able increase the display size on Flickr which remained unless I altered it again. Does any one know how to do this on Firefox 4

Make sure that you not run Firefox in (permanent) [[Private Browsing]] mode.
* You enter Private Browsing mode if you select: Tools > Options > Privacy > History: Firefox will: "Never Remember History"
* To see all History and Cookie settings, choose: Tools > Options > Privacy, choose the setting <b>Firefox will: Use custom settings for history</b>
* Uncheck: [ ] "Permanent Private Browsing mode"
You can use one of these extensions to adjust the default font size and page zoom on web pages:
* Default FullZoom Level - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/6965
* NoSquint - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/2592

When creating a new DPS should I use sizes offered by InDesign or the display size of the device?

Hello all,
When creating a new DPS, should I use the sizes offered by InDesign or the display size of the device? I ran into this question when I was looking up the sizes of different devices and found that iPhone 5s, iPhone5c, and iPhone4s sizes differ than the defauly dimensions offered by InDesign.
Also, should I worry about the ppi resolution? With iPhone, they all seem to be 326ppi but when dealing with other devices is this something that I should take into consideration? Ideally, I could be creating DPS apps for all devices offered in the Digital Publishing drop down in InDesign (iPhone, iPad, Kindle Fire/Nook, and Android).
Thank you for any help you can provide.
By the way, if it helps I am using InDesign CC.

Using 1024x768 and creating PDF articles will get you OK with both iPad resolutions, and, as Bob L. says, quite decent "one size fits all" result for all other devices.

How to set the display size of the PDF - in percent?

Hi, I wonder if anyone knows if it is possible to set
the display size of the PDF document, so that it always
shows in, let´s say 100%, in the viewers browser window?
Much grateful for any help!
/Anni

In Acrobat, under Document Properties (Ctrl+D), you can edit the Initial
View settings, including the zoom level.

How to set display size of a Region or Dynamic Region?

Hi,experts,
In jdev 11.1.2.3,
I drag and drop a task-flow into a jsf page to create a Region,
and set display size for the region, source code as:
===================
<f:facet name="second">
<af:decorativeBox theme="medium" id="db1">
<f:facet name="center">
<af:panelGroupLayout layout="scroll" id="pgl1"
inlineStyle="width:1200px;height:700px;">
<af:region value="#{bindings.trainflow11.regionModel}" id="r1"
inlineStyle="width:1200px;height:700px;"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</f:facet>
</af:decorativeBox>
</f:facet>
=================
But, the Region is only showed a small fraction area on the parent jsf page whenever during design or run time.
How to set display size of a Region or Dynamic Region?
Thanks!

Hi,
the decorative box is supposed to stretch components in the center facet, so at runtime the region should stretch. Can you try with a static region to see if this is an issue with dynamic regions?
Frank

Flash Display size on various monitor sizes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for