%FM-6-FM_CONSISTENCY_CHECK_LOG_STATUS: Consistency Checker found inconsistency.

Hi Team,
We are getting frequent logs in 6500 platform switch
%FM-6-FM_CONSISTENCY_CHECK_LOG_STATUS: Consistency Checker found inconsistency.
          Consistency run details : Timestamp 2014-02-05@09:16:56. Log Id: 13082
          Please use 'show platform feature-manager consistency-check log 13082'
          to get details about the failed consistency checks.
Is this is an issue with the hardware or software please expertise this..
Regards,
Arun

Hi Leo,
We cannot find the exact consistency log id which is came in the show log, PFB
show platform feature-manager consistency-check log ?
<13310-13314> Log identifier
=====================================
CONSISTENCY CHECKER : ENABLED
    remaining timer value: 1192 seconds
=====================================
Log Id 13310
Log Type Static Features
Timestamp 2014-02-10@03:18:08
Feature Manager auto-correct is currently enabled
[1]:   No inconsistencies found on this run.
S03#show platform feature-manager consistency-check log 13311
=====================================
CONSISTENCY CHECKER : ENABLED
    remaining timer value: 1187 seconds
=====================================
Log Id 13311
Log Type Dynamic Features
Timestamp 2014-02-10@03:48:08
Feature Manager auto-correct is currently enabled
[1]:   No inconsistencies found on this run.
S03#show platform feature-manager consistency-check log 13312
=====================================
CONSISTENCY CHECKER : ENABLED
    remaining timer value: 1184 seconds
=====================================
Log Id 13312
Log Type RBACL Feature
Timestamp 2014-02-10@04:18:09
Feature Manager auto-correct is currently enabled
[1]:   No inconsistencies found on this run.
S03#show platform feature-manager consistency-check log 13313
=====================================
CONSISTENCY CHECKER : ENABLED
    remaining timer value: 1177 seconds
=====================================
Log Id 13313
Log Type Interface Default entries
Timestamp 2014-02-10@04:48:09
Feature Manager auto-correct is currently enabled
[1]:   No inconsistencies found on this run.
S03#show platform feature-manager consistency-check log 13314
=====================================
CONSISTENCY CHECKER : ENABLED
    remaining timer value: 1174 seconds
=====================================
Log Id 13314
Log Type Interface Default entries
Timestamp 2014-02-10@05:18:09
Feature Manager auto-correct is currently enabled
[1]:   No inconsistencies found on this run.

Similar Messages

DPM 2012 R2 Consistency Check (Replica Inconsistent) Error for Failover Cluster

I have a SCDPM 2012 R2 instance running against a Windows Server 2012 R2 Failover Cluster on the network.
However, any new/migrated Roles/Virtual machines that I add under an existing protection group always gives me an error saying that the replica is inconsistent.
I've verified the following :
1. All windows updates are applied on the cluster hosts & the DPM server.
2. The VSS and DPMRA services are running on the hosts & DPM server.
3. The Windows Server Backup feature has been installed on all the machines as well.
4. The short term storage disks attached to the DPM server are LUNs and there is enough free space on those.
What else am I missing that could be causing the Replica to be inconsistent - considering that these are new VMs on the hosts themselves - is there a way to force a fresh replica to be created?

Do not remove any of the providers they come with the system. There is just something wrong with that VM, your trying to backup, as it could take the initial replica creation.
Check all of the following
1) Make sure you have enough C drive space on the guest - need space to create a snapshot
2) Check the vssadmin list wirters for any errors
If none of the above, rerun the consistency check when no other backup is running. Check the Application log on the host for any vss failures
Ensure you have all the DPM hotfixes - I am compiling a list since i've been thru many DPM issues.
Great product when you get it going but like any product there are bumps in the road :)
ANNCEX

SELS error during consistency checks. Fieldname not found in sender

I'm stuck in the System Analysis section, after starting programs for Generation and Reveiver settings. The task "Execute Consistency Checks" returns an error in PC001_PCL_CHECK.
Check SELS started at 16.06.2011 14:38:31
Errors detected for conversion object A910 :
A910:Fieldname VKORG of structure S_A910 mentioned in selref not found in sender
Check SELS finished at 16.06.2011 14:39:00
The help says:
The selection field mentioned for the reduction of this conversion object does not exist in the sender system. Thus this selection field can not be used for reduction. Please remove the assignment of this conversion object from reduction. For further assistance please contact SAP support.
My question is simply HOW? Where can I remove this object? I don't even find a structure called S_A910 in any of my systems. I have table A910 but it doesn't have a field called VKORG in it at all... I'm somewhat lost here.
I've added the latest SPs (17) and also applied all the notes. At least I think I applied them all... I repeated the step several times, no luck.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
Stefan

Hi Sandeep,
Many thanks for your reply. The note hasn't fixed the issue so I'm still stuck with the exact same error. I did run it as described and while the report updated a few fields, it didn't help to eliminate the error. Reading the note it would appear that the error described there is different from what I'm facing.
> error message like : "TVKOV: member ID_VKORG of group G_VK has no selref field!
I am getting "Fieldname of structure S_A910 mentioned in selref not found in sender" so to me it looks like a different issue.
Oh well... Nothing like a bit of fun.

CUCM 9.X version RTMT Error - LSIESG_AlertIndication 500605B005F63930 Consistency Check inconsistency logging disabled on VD 00/0

Hi ,
I am getting the below error on RTMT on CUCM 9.1 Version running on MCS 7835-I3-K9-CMD2 Error
At Sat May 24 03:12:40 IST 2014 on node , the following HardwareFailure events generated:
hwStringMatch : May 24 03:12:23 ASHISH-CM01 daemon 4 Director Agent:
LSIESG_AlertIndication 500605B005F63930 Consistency Check inconsistency logging disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev: 3.
AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent
ClusterID :
NodeID : ASHISH-CM01
TimeStamp : Sat May 24 03:12:23 IST 2014
hwStringMatch : May 24 03:12:23 ASHISH-CM01 daemon 4 Director Agent:
LSIESG_StorageVolume_Modified 500605B005F63930 Consistency Check inconsistency logging disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev: 3.
AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent
ClusterID :
NodeID : ASHISH-CM01
TimeStamp : Sat May 24 03:12:24 IST 2014
Does anybody has any idea on the same.
Your inputs would be appreciated ..
Regards,
Ashish Bagla

Hello,
Did you find the origins of the alerts? I have the same on 2 defferent servers about at the same time of the night a Saturday night too.
Looks like bug CSCts69041
Thansk,
Hervé Jacquemin

Spool Consistency Check

Hello,
We are facing spool consistency error messages in SM21. Later we found that there are no spool consistency jobs running in our system. Of late, I have started running RSTS0020 three times daily with an interval of one hour between each run. Whatever object I find repeating in all the three runs, I delete only those.
I am trying to automate this process. What job do I schedule to perform the same task. One more question that haunts me is, even if I schedule a report to run at midnight every day, how can I delete the inconsistent object shown in the report, automatically. And don't I need to schedule the job three times with an interval of one hour between each job schedule? I am not sure how do I go about this. I am confused. Please help.
Thank you.

Thank you for responding. If you had read my question correctly, I am also doing the same. I am running RSTS0020 in SE38 which, is the same as SP12 consistency check because, SP12 consistency check runs RSTS0020 in the background. But, my question was different. Here is my question again.
As per note 48400, you have to run RSTS0020 three times with an interval of one hour each. So, currently I am running this manually and at the end of every run, you get the output of inconsistent objects. What I do is, I take a screenshot of all the three runs then compare them. I select the check boxes and delete only those objects that has been repeated in all the three runs.
I know we can run RSTS0020 in the background but, I don't know how can I perform the later part of the above task. I mean when I execute RSTS0020 in the background, how can I delete the inconsistent objects? Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you.

Consistency check error in sender file content conversion

Dear Experts,
I am trying one simple File to File scenario in which i have only fields 1>salesorder_number 2>Description
I created a txt file with line items "100,crudeoil" with file name as salesorder.txt
In the sender file adapter i have configured the file convertion paramenters as follows:
Document name : mt_salesorder_sender
Document namespace : http://se.com.sa/sec-sa-qax "Namespace of message type
Recordset Structure : document,*
document.endSeparator : 'nl'
document.fieldSeparator: ,
document.fieldNames : salesorder_number,Description
So after this if i run the scenario In file adapter i am getting the error like "Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Parameter 'document.fieldFixedLengths' or 'document.fieldSeparator' is missing Consistency check: no. of arguments in 'document.fieldFixedLength' does not match 'document.fieldNames' (0 <> 2) "
Please let me know where i am going wrong.
Regards,
Santhosh

Hi,
please maintain the order as
Recordset Structure : document,*
document.fieldNames : salesorder_number,Description
document.fieldSeparator: ,
document.endSeparator : 'nl'
Rgds
joel

Fileserver consistency checks failing 0x809909B0

I have a file server with approx. 1.7TB of files which became inconsistent on the 8<sup>th</sup> of November, and has been unable to complete a consistency check since then.
Consistency checks fail with the error:
The protection agent on <server> was temporarily unable to respond because it was in an unexpected state. (ID 60 Details: Internal error code: 0x809909B0)
I have removed and re-added the server, including deleting the protected data from DPM disk, and reinstalled the DPM agent on the file server, but I still receive the above error when consistency checking.
DPM is System Center 2012 R2 v4.2.1254.0 on Windows Server 2012 R2.
The file server is running Windows Server 2012 R2 also.
KB2919355 is installed on both systems.
I did have Dedup running on the file server, but have un-deduped the drive as part of troubleshooting this issue.
Other servers backed up by this DPM server are being backed up fine, including a HyperV cluster, 2 exchange servers and 2 sharepoint farms.
There are a large number of these errors in the DPMRA log around the time the job fails:
5288       4F48
11/28     22:49:56.601
29
radefaultsubtask.cpp(355)
[00000000013EE9D0]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
WARNING
Failed: Hr: = [0x809909b0] : CRADefaultSubTask: WorkitemID does not exist, {EB6F4726-E5C5-4958-B034-542518E5A931}
5288       4F48
11/28     22:49:56.601
05
defaultsubtask.cpp(546)
[00000000013EE9D0]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
WARNING
Failed: Hr: = [0x809909b0] : Encountered Failure: : lVal : CommandReceivedSpecific(pCommand, pOvl)
5288       4F48
11/28     22:49:56.601
05
defaultsubtask.cpp(751)
[00000000013EE9D0]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
WARNING
Failed: Hr: = [0x809909b0] : Encountered Failure: : lVal : CommandReceived(pAgentOvl)
5288       4F48
11/28     22:50:03.635
03
runtime.cpp(1376)
[00000000012F4850]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
FATAL   Subtask failure, sending status response XML=[<?xml version="1.0"?>
5288       4F48
11/28     22:50:03.635
03
runtime.cpp(1376)
[00000000012F4850]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
FATAL   <Status xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/dls/StatusMessages.xsd" StatusCode="-2137454160" Reason="Error" CommandID="RACancelAllSubTasks" CommandInstanceID="8a514c9b-6a62-42b4-a03b-0f938e3f20cc"
GuidWorkItem="eb6f4726-e5c5-4958-b034-542518e5a931" TETaskInstanceID="50c1500f-0353-4d2a-8188-fc03612e2503"><ErrorInfo xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/dls/GenericAgentStatus.xsd" ErrorCode="536872913"
DetailedCode="-2137454160" DetailedSource="2"><Parameter Name="AgentTargetServer" Value="DPM01.domain.com"/></ErrorInfo></Status>
5288       4F48
11/28     22:50:03.635
03
runtime.cpp(1376)
[00000000012F4850]       50C1500F-0353-4D2A-8188-FC03612E2503
FATAL   ]
I have also tried the steps in this article with no change:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/107bdce0-e13c-427a-9341-07d4b558f007/dpmra-crashing-after-update-to-dpm-2012-r2-ur2
Currently I have reduced the amount of shares being backed up to just ~400gb of data and I have it in a consistent state, but I need to get the remainder of the data backed up, and I can’t be in a situation where if it becomes inconsistent it can’t run a
successful consistency check again.

Hi,
If you want to pursue this immediately, you can visit the following web site to open a support incident. The charge to your CC will not be processed until your case is resolved and closed, if it's a code defect in the DPM then we wave all charges.
http://support.microsoft.com/select/Default.aspx?target=assistance
In the Quick product finder, enter:System Center 2012 R2 - then select System Center 2012 R2 Data Protection Manager
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Regards, Mike J. [MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

RME 4.3.1 device update failing 'WARNING : Cat3560(7.3):Consistency check failed for base package SharedNetshowIOS'

Hi Guys,
I'm having some issues updating the device packages for my RME 4.3.1 install.
I've downloaded and tried to update the 'Cat3560.zip' package via the GUI, but the job fails with the above error.
I pulled up the PSU.log and found the following:
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : isExistsVersionFile=true
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : _CURCMVER=5.2.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : CMF Package Map Available.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : CMVERSION=5.2.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : MDFVERSION=1.41
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : isExistsVersionFile=true
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : VERSION=4.3
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : PATCHVER=1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : MDFVERSION=1.41
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : isExistsVersionFile=true
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : _CURCMVER=5.2.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : CMF Package Map Available.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : CMVERSION=5.2.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : MDFVERSION=1.41
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters] : Adapter for CM already loaded.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters] : Adapter for CVW already loaded.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : isExistsVersionFile=true
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : _CURDFMVER=3.2.0
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : CMF Package Map Available.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : DFMVERSION=3.2.0
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : MDFVERSION=1.41
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : isExistsVersionFile=true
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : VERSION=4.3
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : PATCHVER=1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : MDFVERSION=1.41
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters] : Adapter for RME already loaded.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters] : Adapter for CVW already loaded.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : isExistsVersionFile=true
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : VERSION=4.3
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : PATCHVER=1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty] : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>] : MDFVERSION=1.41
[ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters] : Adapter for RME already loaded.
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages] : Locking package repository..
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageInstaller : installStep_resolve] : Checking Dependencies...
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages] : SharedSwim2900XL has 17 dependent packages
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[ImageParserAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Lower version of dependent package[SharedDcmaIOS] installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages] : Consistency check failed for base package SharedDcmaIOS
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[DistributionAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Lower version of dependent package[LibSwim] installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages] : Consistency check failed for base package LibSwim
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[SwimJobOptionsAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[ImageAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[SoftwareAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[ConfigAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Lower version of dependent package[LibCommon] installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages] : Consistency check failed for base package LibCommon
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[SystemAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[ImageListAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[ContainmentAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[FlashAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[MemoryAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[RemoteStageAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Dependent package[SwimCCOAG] already installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent] : Lower version of dependent package[SharedSwimIOS] installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages] : Consistency check failed for base package SharedSwimIOS
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [PsuPkgResolver : pickLatest] : No packages to pick ..Empty package set passed .
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR [PsuPkgResolver : populateResolverResult] : All selected packages failed consistency check..
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [SimpleProgress : progressInfo] : Progress: WARNING: SharedSwim2900XL(2.2.3): Consistency check failed for base package SharedDcmaIOS
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageInstaller : installStep_resolve] : Packages selected for install (satisfies consistency check) : []
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [SimpleProgress : progressInfo] : Progress: No packages to be installed
[ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages] : Creating maps in D:\CSCOpx\www\classpath\com\cisco\nm\xms\psu\pkgs\rme
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.7.5.19 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6010 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6020 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6030 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7101 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.8110 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6040 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7102 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7201 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6050 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7103 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7301 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6060 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7203 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7401 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7501 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7303 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7213 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6070 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7502 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7223 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7503 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7504 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : * not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:12:31 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.99999999 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6010 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6020 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6030 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7101 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.8110 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6040 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7102 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7201 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6050 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7103 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7301 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6060 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7203 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7401 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7501 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7303 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7213 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6070 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7502 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7223 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7503 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps] : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7504 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
[ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages] : Releasing lock...
[ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DeviceSupportHistory : init] : Loading history db fromD:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\xms\psu\conf\historyDB
[ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DeviceSupportHistory : init] : Number of Events Loaded in init()6
Before i started to bug TAC, I figured I'd post this here.
Let me know your thoughts

Looks like your package repository has been corrupted. TAC can provide a procedure to recover from this corruption. The following DOC indicates why this can happen and has suggestions on how to avoid these problems from re-occuring.

Error BM311 during Model Consistency Check in APO

Hi APO Experts
I find error BM311 - Units of different dimensions cannot be converted during Model Consistency Check in APO.
How can I get to know the code or Unit of Measure, where the inconsistency is there to rectify?
Please suggest.
Thank you.
Pradipta Sahoo

Hi Pradipta,
Can you check below notes:
943543
928502
837310
Regards,
Mukesh Pandey

Secondary DPM (2012 R2) Issues: synchronising too much data from Primary DPM, persistant consistancy checks, and no dedup support!

I have a Primary DPM server that is protecting various File servers and a Exchange DAG. Everything is working as it should on this server, but I am experiencing constant issues on the secondary DPM protecting these same data sources.
On the primary, two Protection Groups in particular are set up to protect two different volumes on the same file server. Volume D:\ is 46TB in size, with a deduplicated file size of 22TB (actual 39TB) whilst Volume E:\ is 25 TB in size, with a deduplicated
file size of 2.5TB (actual 5.5TB).
Issue 1:
As expected Volume D: was initially replicated to the secondary DPM server at its undeduplicated size ( 39TB), as was Volume E:\ with initial replication to the secondary of 5.5 TB. So when is Microsoft going to support dedup on a secondary DPM ? It
seems daft to support dedup on the Primary DPM which is always more likely to be close to the original datasources on the LAN and not on the secondary DPM which is most likely to be placed offsite on a WAN !
Issue 2:
I have a big issue with the subsequent Synchronizations on the secondary server for E: which seems to transfer almost the full 5.5 TB every day ( I have it set to sync every 24hrs) - although the data is fairly static (i.e.unchanging) on that volume. On
one occasion a Sync continued for over 48 hours for this volume and had transferred over 20GB (according to the DPM console) , until I manually cancelled the job - how is that possible on a volume with only 5.5 TB (UN-deduplicated) ?? What is going on here
- has anyone any ideas?
Issue 3:
Another File server I am protecting on both the Primary & Secondary DPM server - always fails over to a consistency check on the secondary server - usually due to the fact it cannot access a particular file which results in an inconsistent replica .
However the Sync (and subsequent restore point) on the primary DPM server from the original datasource is always completes without any issues. Again, has anyone any clues ?
I do get the impression that the whole Secondary DPM thing is not quite robust enough. I can only assume that as the Primary seems to protect the original datasources ok, that the issue is with the secondary reading the information on the primary DPM.

I tried changing the time of the synchronization, but that didn't help.
Meanwhile, I was working on another unrelated case with Microsoft and so I didn't want to have a second case open at the same time. So I waited for some weeks with no change on this problem. Then, about a day or two before I was finally going to call Microsoft
to open a case (months after the problem had started), the problem suddenly resolved itself, with no input from me! So I don't really know if it was time that fixed it eventually or what. Sorry I can't be of more help.
Rob

Sender FTP: FCC Missing Consistency check: no. of arguments does not match

Hi well my Input i as follows:
7283167S500481000000001789098
whereas my FCC in Sender-CC FTP is like:
RecordSet-Name: BestfileRecordSet
PecordSetStructure: BestFileHeader,,BestFilePos,
Recordsets per Mesage: *
KeyfieldName: BDART
BestFileHeader.fieldNames=BDKDNR,BDDSKNR,BDART
BestFileHeader.fieldFixedLenghts=4,3,1
BestFileHeader.endSeparator= 'nl'
BestFileHeader.processFieldNames= fromConfiguration
BestFileHeader.keyFieldValue=T
BestFilePos.fieldNames= BDART,BDIDENT,BDMENGE,BDFREMD
BestFilePos.fieldFixedLenghts= 1,8,7,10
BestFilePos.endSeparator= 'nl'
BestFilePos.processFieldNames= fromConfiguration
BestFilePos.keyFieldValue = S
BestfileRecordSet.endSeparator='nl'
In CC-Monitoring i get:
java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Parameter 'BestFileHeader.fieldFixedLengths' or 'BestFileHeader.fieldSeparator' is missing Consistency check: no. of arguments in 'BestFileHeader.fieldFixedLength' does not match 'BestFileHeader.fieldNames' (0 <> 3)
so what is wrong?! Can sb help me?!
br Jens

Hi Guru, i would appreciate your help. Well the data in input-structure looks like:
7283167TCARTON
7283167T
7283167S014800000000010
7283167S015823030000004
7283167S016352100000040
7283167S016792020000007
7283167S016793020000007
7283167S031502020000010
etc.
Problem is also that instead of T (header) and S (Position) there might be L,D (also for Position). Therefore i have no clue how to handle these values as keyfieldValues.
some ideas?! br Jens

Routing Consistency Check in batch ?

Hey folks!
A business requirement has been raised to perform a consistency check for all Routing Task Lists for a specific plant. I'm aware of the consistency check within the Routing that can be performed online. Anyone know of a batch/background job that can validate routings and report errors?
The business case is as follows: Reference Operation Sets are utilized within Routing Task Lists. If a change is made to the Reference Operation Set (say add additional operations) and these additional operations conflict in the routing this ROS is utilized, this will cause a routing error. Yet there is no way to identify this error until someone checks the routing or writes a production order against.
Any help on the above would be great. Points are waiting to be awarded!

Nathan,
I do not think there is a background program that can run to check for such inconsistency.
However when MRP runs system will detect routing inconsistency & will display exception message against planned order.
So nett result is MRP controller will know about this much before he converts planned order to production order.
They can look for exception messages either under Tcode: MD04/ MD05 or collectively under MD06/MD07 group by exception message.
Message 62 - Scheduling: Master data inconsistent is one such message & it falls under Exception group 4 in standard SAP.
So if MRP controller checks Tcode : MD06 & limits selection criteria by exception group 4 messages he can nail down all such errors in advance.
Thanks,
Ram

LMS3.1 psu problem - Consistency check failed for base package ...AG

Hello,
We've got a package updater problem with a LMS3.1 installation.
1. After trying to update RME Device packages from GUI we got a message that LibCommon-v2.3.2 is needed
2. We tried to update LibCommon from CLI using psucli.bat, see below
3. We found a discussion in this forum, simular to this problem with the hint to reinstall the RME, what we did but with no improvement
4. We deinstalled, reboot, did a new installation of LMS3.1. But the problem still exists, with same message. We need the PSU, because most of our devices will be managed after device package update only.
Updating of each package brings warnings with pseudo package names, as ImageAG, MemoryAG and not with hints to real missing packages:
C:\lms\bin>psucli -p rme -install -src C:\install\lm31-updates\ LibCommon
WARNING: LibCommon(2.3.2):Consistency check failed for base package ImageAG
see also the psu.log containing all tryes of package updates
The problem goes a little bit in this direction, but with a new reinstallation as well:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/669047#669047
What can we do?
thx for hints, Steffen

When you install LMS on Windows, there are some recommended steps to take to ensure the installation is a problem free as possible:
Set the per-user and global TEMP and TMP environment variables to short values (e.g. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP)
Disable all anti-virus software
Disable Windows Data Execution Protection (DEP)
Login to the server as a local Adminitrator
Install from original, locally attached media
NEVER abort the installation after the installer says not to
Based on the symptoms described here, I'm guessing at least the first item was not done. TAC has a procedure to recover a bad RME package repository, but if the base installation is problematic, doing so would be moot. If you suspect the installation isn't 100% (beyond the package repository), uninstall, then follow the above steps to reinstall.
If you think the problem is just with the RME package repository, contact TAC, and they can provide you a good, up-to-date repository to jump start things for you.

But what if my Consistency Check consistently fails?

So, I've been trying to clean up my Library in preparation for installing V3.0. Each time I try to run a consistency check, the progress bar makes it about 75% of the way and then . . . . nothing. Ever. Finder does NOT report that Aperture is not responding, but nothing happens. Left overnight. Nothing. No option but to Force Quit, which I'm sure can't be good. I had sort of assumed that the consistency check should be run before / rather than a complete rebuild, no? Didn't think I wanted to rebuild a large(ish) and possibly inconsistent database. Anyone know of any way around this . . .?

Rebuilding the database actually rebuilds it from scratch, from the XML files stored for each Version and Album, so the rebuild doesn't involve your existing database at all.
If you consistently can't run the consistency check (try saying that ten times!) then rebuilding the DB would be the next step.
I would suggest that you duplicate the Library first though, just in case...
I agree. definitely duplicate your library. I had problem with the Aperture First aid as well (consistency check worked, Repair Database would stay at 0% and not move, so I rebuilt my DB and lost the library. Definitely Definitely duplicate or backup your library before you rebuild it.

Time Dimension Consistency Check Failed

Dear all,
Got a issue..
A cube which is found to be active in RSA1, but when we do the consistency check for time dimension in the transaction RSRV, we get the following error.
Unknown, profound errors with instance creation in test "CL_RSRV_CHK_TIM_DIM"
Pl help to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Ramya

Hi Ramya,
Welcome to SDN...!!
Check with the Correct Error option in RSRV after selecting testing ur cube.
Best Regards,
SG

%FM-6-FM_CONSISTENCY_CHECK_LOG_STATUS: Consistency Checker found inconsistency.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for