FM Account Assignment is incomplete (Funds Center)

Dear all,
We are upgrading from 4.6C to 6.0, when i am post invoice to accounts it shows the message FM Account Assignment is Incomplete (Funds Center). I think in order i have to enter Fund Center but in order it dosenot enter me the funds center at item level in Account assignment category.
Can any one please give some solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj

Dear Pankaj
Reproducing the extract taken from "Funds Management" of SAP which I though would be helpful to you
If the system can determine an FM account assignment from the FM-CO assignment table, this appears as the default value.
If the sytem cannot determine an FM account assignment, you must enter one by choosing Assignments -> Funds Management.
The FM account assignments that you have to enter depends on the field control.  You should choose this in a such a way that you have to enter the funds center and, if required the fund.
Owing to the account assignment logic applying in Funds Management, the system can derive the commitment automatically in the subsequent postings - for example, from the G/L Account or Cost element.  If the commitment item is derived from the cost element, you should ensure that the same commitment item is assigned to the primary cost elements and to the settlement cost elements.
As long as the FM account assignment in a network/network activity is not complete according to the field control, the order status HMKU (FM account assignment incomplete) is active.  This status prevents automatic generation of purchase requisitions for components and services procured externally as well as releasing the order.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

  • PM Error Message " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center) messa

    Dear PM Experts.
    We use PM module for both Preventive maintenance and Breakdown maintenace.
    While creating an breakdown maintenance order, the system gives me an error message: " FM Account assignment is incomplete (Funds center), error  message number FI135";
    As a result i cant release the order for further processing.
    Kindly help me to resolve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Richard.

    Hi
    Try below it may solve your problem .
    1. Go To Change Order  (IW32)
    2. form the Menu Path --- GOTO -- Assignments -- Fund Management
    3. Either your Fund center field will be blank there or the Fund Center available there is no more Valid now .
    4. Get the correct Fund Center from commercial & Enter there --- Save the Order & Release it .
    Regards
    Sameer

  • Derivation of Account Assignment Reference using Fund

    I am trying to derive account assignment reference using “Fund” as source field. I have created the account assignment derivation rule (Tcode – TPM30) using following condition and Values
    Source Field
    Company code
    Product type
    Fund – Not able to see as Source field after activation of FIN_TRM_PSM_INTEGRATION business switch
    Target Field
    Account Assignment Reference (AA_REF)
    Condition
    Product Type = 410

    Hi there
    You can only use the Derivation Types which are selectable. You cannot create your own ones such as "fund". In this case, if accounting entries are different you have to create a new product type called "funds".
    Regards
    Juerg Heiz
    [email protected]

  • Consuming document with different account assignment from Earmarked Funds

    Hi,
    We have implemented Public Sector FM functionality in version ECC 6.0 and we are using Earmarked Funds (Funds Reservation).
    The system is allowing to post consuming documents with different account assignment from that in the
    Funds reservation document nevertheless we donu2019t have set the indicator 'Acct.asst.changeable' in the Funds Reservation document.
    I don't need the fields Fund Center and Commitment Item to be transfered from earmarked funds document (Define Rules for Account Assignment Transfer). Instead, if consuming document have a different account assignment, the user should get the error message no. RE603 'Account assignment differs from document XX 001'.
    In version 4.6C it worked this way. In our case the Fund Center is delivered from Cost Center and Commitment Item is delivered from Cost Element (SAP - Derivation Strategy for FM Object Assignment).
    I hope someone can help me.
    Thanks in advance,
    Rodrigo

    Hi,
    You get the error message RE603 when you make the settings below:
    1. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Account assignment transfer > Define rules for account assignment transfer; you flag the 'Active' boxes for account assignment (sort of conterintuitive).
    2. Spro > ... > Earmarked funds and funds transfer > Change message control; change RE603 to 'E'.
    3. In Earmarked fund document, flag the 'Acct.asst. changeable' box (totally conterintuitive).
    Please give it a try and let us know the outcome.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • Blocking of Account Assignment categery K cost center

    Hello friends,
    I have one issue while creating purchase requisition.
    I want to block use of account assignemnt categery K - cost center while creating purchase requisition for my document type
    is there any setting in custimising or any user exit available.
    Edited by: vrunda on Jul 31, 2009 10:02 AM

    Hi,
    You can block the account assignment category being used for your Purchase requisition type with the combination of ITEMCATEGORY  only
    You cant block ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT CATEGORY alone
    Goto the transaction code OLME AND choose your PR document type and against it select the check box N which means"NO ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT CATEGORY  " Allowed
    Hope this will work.
    regards,
    santosh

  • Funds center and commetment item

    Good evening!
    We are HCM consultants. We were asked by our FI department to conduct a
    post run for two personnel numbers in development system.
    After the post run, the documents consider errors which say, for
    example, that "in position 00001 21 993-05 commitment item was not
    determined". 21 is a company code, 993-05 is a G/L account. This error
    occurs for numerous accounts. Our FI says that they have customized
    everything for 21 company code and have put commitment items for every
    G/L account. They ask whether it is possible to customize fields for
    funds center and commitment item in HCM, IT0015 where we determine
    account assignment.
    In the SAP course IPS910 they found a passage about HCM and FI
    integration where is said that "Funds center and Fund can be determined
    for org. unit/position/personnel. In addition to funds center and fund
    there can be determind also a commitment item for info-types
    considering account assignmet (0014,0015,2001-2005,2010)".
    We in HCM guess that there is something wrong with FI customizing, 'cos
    in HCM it's impossible to activate those fields, or even if it
    possible - it's wrong.
    The question is - is it possible to add fields for funds center in HCM
    (IT0015) or it's not worth doing?
    Best regards,
    Eldar       
    Steps for Reconstruction    
    1. In HCM all the entris are standard. We made entries in IT0015,
    started payroll and posting.
    2. FI made their customizing for 21 company code.

    Hello Eldar,
    I will provide you some hints below.
    1) To have the integration between PSM-FM and HCM, in PSM side you should check:
    SPRO (IMG)
    Public Sector Management
    Funds Management Government
    Actual and Commitment Update/Integration
    Integration
    Integration with Human Resources (HR)
    Please check all the sub-menus there and the documentation available in from of each link. It is very good and provides some links for all the customizings that needs to be done.
    2) Check also the configuration as it is described in the enclosed note 766613. It is related to view V_T588N.
    3) If Funds Management and Controlling are updated in an integrated way such that the cost center is always the leading account assignment and the fund center is derived, the HR must not (and does not) support the maintenance of derived information (such as fund center). Thus there are the following three possible scenarios:
    - Funds Management (FM) is not active.   -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
    - FM is active but without CO-Integration-> HR shows Fund Center
    - FM is active with CO Integration       -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
    With CO Integration turned on, the derivation functionality is utilized to determine the Fund Center in HR. However, if you are looking for manual input in the FC field (and subsequent saving of this value on
    the database), all I can provide would be a modification to inform HR that the FC field is active.
    To perform that, you would need to make the following coding change to give HR the indication that the field should be displayed and edited:
    FUNCTION FM_DC_GET_ACTIVE_DIMENSIONS:
        if ( CO-FM-Integration is on )
           IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on ).         <   Delete
           IF (  l_f_fm01-co_integration  =  con_on AND     <   Insert
             NOT l_f_fm01-co_int_start_hr IS INITIAL ).     <   Insert
           IF (  l_f_fm01-co_integration  =  con_on AND
    You will need to perform the necessary testing in HR to ensure that it is functioning as intended as I am unsure of the differences in the HR functionality between 46C and ECC 600.
    These scenarios can be maintained with time dependence (active from-dates): There can be a period for the first, a second time interval for the second and a third time interval for the last scenario.
    4) Please check if you have implemented note 918775. It should be present in your system
    5) Please check if you have implemented note  755796. It should be present in your system
    6) Please check also the note 701933.
    I hope I could help you 
    Let me know your comments if I am going in the wrong direction.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Funds Management  - Wrong Account Assignment getting cleared in PR

    Hi All,
    We are working on Funds Management implementation at our workplace and we are facing a problem relating to account assignment. (SAP ECC 6.0)
    We have defined a Account Assignment Derivation for a material as
    Material Number = A100 assigned to Commitment Item = ComItem1 and Funds Center = FunCen1.
    Now during the creation of a PR for A100, where the Funds Center and Commitment Item fields are mandatory, the wrong commitment item is automatically getting populated (ComItem2 that was defined under a different Funds Center, instead of ComItem1 ;but the fund center field in the PR is alright) and they are also getting passed right up to the MIRO stage, where I get the message "No Commitment Item entered in Item" (here too the wrong funds center and commitment item from the PR are getting populated automatically)
    What's worse is that the budget document contains the new commitment item ComItem2 created under FunCen1.
    I am not clear as to where the assignment to the funds center and the commitment item in the PR happens - and given that the assignment is given as required, how are the wrong values getting populated and then allowed to proceed upto MIRO ?
    Regards,
    Wy

    Hi Eli Klovsky,
    Thanks for the suggestion - was helpful to find out the target fields through the trace.
    We went to the details column for the target field in the rule definition structure, and activated the "Overwrite with New Value" field, and in this case, the new values of fund center and commitment item are getting over-written.
    However, one problem I have faced is that for materials which have no assignments, when we create the PR on the same line as that of the previous PR (By changing the material number), the old values are not getting replaced. They are however getting replaced once we come back and create a new PR, or add the material on another line.
    Have to explore this better - there might be some human errors, where the material number is changed on the same line as that of the previous material PR, in which case, the existence of the previous commitment item and fund centers can result in wrong allocations to other divisions..
    @All,
    Really sorry to be continuing this discussion here, is it possible to move this to the appropriate Public Sector group  ?

  • Profit Center in Account assignment tab

    Hi All,
      My Client wants to add a field "PROFIT CENTER" in account assignment tab in portal with F4 option and that value should be transferred to back end system as well. Please tell me how to achieve it.
    Regards,
    Prasath

    Hi Prasath,
    You can create a new account assignment category called profit center in configuration. Please refer to this thread Account assignment category Y in SRM - Profit center field
    Kind Regards,
    Hari

  • No Funds Center error while creating Production Order in CO01

    Hi SAP Consultants,
    I am trying to save production order in transaction CO01 but I am getting error saying "No funds center entered/derived in item 00001"
    Diagnosis
    In company code (&2) the component Funds Management is active. This requires the entries or the derivation of a funds center.
    You can use the following elements to derive the funds center: company code / account  or CO object .
    Procedure
    Enter a funds center or ensure that the funds center can be derived from the possible assignments by:
    assigning a funds center in the commitment items- master record or maintaining the assigning of a funds center to the CO object.
    My company is a public sector company and Funds management is active.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Kindly check for item 0001 in the Material Master which Profit Center is maintained and check if a Funds center is assigned to it. This should solve your problem.

  • Unable to do the restriction at Fund Center or FM Area when FM is not activ

    Hi,
    we have the following business requirement:
    Background of the issue:
    Field Status variant in Account Assignment category and GL:
    We are in the process of rolling out one of our company codes which is
    in a different instance(server).
    We already have some 130+ company codes running in a different
    instance. This is a kind of Instance consolidation to bring all systems
    under one instance.
    Funds Management has been activated in the company code for which we
    are carrying out the rollout. FM has not been activated for the
    existing company codes.
    Now, the issue is with regard to the field status variants, which can
    be controlled at the company code level and which cannot be controlled
    which is at the client level.
    (i)     The existing company codes have a field status variant which
    has the field status groups having the fields Commitment items and
    Funds center in Suppress mode in the existing instance.
    (ii)     The company to be rolled out has the field status variant which
    has field status groups having the fields Commitment items and Funds
    Center in Optional mode.
    (iii)     On the other hand, there is yet another field status control
    for the Account assignment objects like Cost center, WBS elements, etc.
    in the MM-FI integration area. This is at client level and at present
    the same has the status of u201CSuppressu201D for Commitment items and Funds
    Center. We have changed the same to u201COptionalu201D for the purpose of
    testing the proposed roll out in our existing instance.
    In that case, the status of GL account assignment in above is
    clashing with our client level field status as described in (iii)
    above. As a result, we are forced to change the field status in
    above to optional mode for our existing company codes which we do not
    intend to do.
    When only one company within a group of companies is activated with FM,
    I feel that:
    (i)     At the client level, there is no option for me other than to
    keep the Funds center and commitment items in optional mode
    (ii)     At the GL level, I should be able to keep my field status in
    Suppress mode (If FM is not activated) and in Optional mode (If FM is
    activated) and SAP should be able to take care of the clash in the
    field status at the transaction level in such a scenario.
    The issue is we are able to control the access if FM is activated for a particular company code, where as we are unable to control the access for other company codes where FM is not activated and FM Area is not linked.
    We tried to use the BADI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST, but this is applicable for POs only.
    Please look into this  issue and help us in meeting our business requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramakrishna

    Hi Justin,
    Thanks for the extra points.
    Copy and save this bold text some where
    /Applications/iChat.app/Contents/MacOS/iChat -errorLogLevel 7
    This needs to be run in Terminal.
    iChat needs to be shut down to do so.
    Just paste it in Terminal after the Welcome to Darwin message and hit enter.
    It will launch iChat and create an on-going log in the Terminal window.
    You will see the reference to the Harware rules.plist
    Further down you will see the bandwidth found by iChat, followed by the number of Audio and Video Buddies that you can support.
    It goes on.....
    It makes a note of the router that you are connected to.
    After that it will end up lists listening checks until you connect to a Chat.
    This makes this a useful way to find out what iChat can see at it's startup.
    To Stop - Quit iChat in the Normal way.
    Save the Log in a Text editor of some sort. (Post here if required).
    Then Quit Terminal.
    It is a useful tool to highlight some things in the start up phase, (And a reminder to look in specific places) when you think you have looked at all the settings.
    8:12 PM Wednesday; November 15, 2006

  • System asking for Fund Center for Reconciliatation GL-S.Creditors

    Hi,
    I followed the steps as per the note, Dump Error due to Fund Management module activation now the dump error is gone, but I am getting one more error message while posting any transaction.
    For example- I am posting a Vendor Invoice in F-02.
    I am entering Cost Center in Expense Line. But system is showing error message for Vendor Line, that is Vendor A/C.
    Error Message:
    No funds center entered/derived in item 00001 (TY01/50101400/)
    Message no. FI313
    Diagnosis
    In company code (&2) the component Funds Management is active. This requires the entries or the derivation of a funds center.
    You can use the following elements to derive the funds center: company code TY01/ account 50101400 or CO object .
    Procedure
    Enter a funds center or ensure that the funds center can be derived from the possible assignments by:
    assigning a funds center in the commitment items- master record or maintaining the assigning of a funds center to the CO object.
    Note***GL A/C 50101400 is S.Creditors account. Now, I am not understanding why system needs Fund Center for S.Creditors in Vendor Line while posting Vendor Invoice. We have assigned Statistical Commitment Item in S.Creditor GL and hence there is no Fund Center assigned to it.
    SCN names removed/
    Message was edited by: Eli Klovski

    Sorry for that. Its noted.
    Just for some clarification. Fund Center and Commitment Items are mandatory fields, but the issue I am facing is completely different.
    I checked with FMDERIVE in my system and checked the pattern for Fund Centers and Commitment Items created. Only P/L items and Cost Centers are created as Fund Centers and Commitments Items.
    Also, the S.Creditors GL is not a Cost Element, hence there is no link to Commitment Item- FMRULES.
    1. Even though, the S.Creditors has been assigned with Commitment 1.
    Commitment Item-1 Master Conditions as below:
    Financial trans.-30
    Commitment Item Category- 3
    Is this conditions correct?
    2. We have Fund Center- Dummy as well.
    Can you suggest me, how to configure this in FMDERIVE?

  • In ME51 fund center field to be made "optional entry"

    Hi experts,
    How to make Fund Center and Commitment Item field in ME51 "Optional Entry"?
    Regards
    Jay

    hi
    I am using ECC6.0 and in ME51N Fund center and commitment items are optional entry fields.
    I am facing this problem only in ME51.
    As per customer requirement Acc *** Cat field is made "Display only".
    I am getting following message
    No funds center entered/derived in item 00001
    Message no. FI313
    Diagnosis
        In company code (&2) the component Funds Management is active. This
        requires the entries or the derivation of a funds center.
        You can use the following elements to derive the funds center: comp
        code GNFC/ account 224001 or CO object .
    Procedure
        Enter a funds center or ensure that the funds center can be derived
        the possible assignments by:
        o   assigning a funds center in the commitment items- master record
            maintaining the assigning of a funds center to the CO object.
    thanks & regards
    jay

  • Error Message F6804 Value Blank/Space invalid for account assignment elemen

    Dear Experts,
    We have a problem in Travel Management,
    I have created a trip for paid by company expenses only and entered cost distribution (fund, funds center and WBS) in the trip.
    When I transfer a trip to FI through transaction PRRW throughing error message "F6804 Value Blank/Space invalid for account assignment element for fund and FI313 No funds center entered/ derived in Item".
    The paid by com. expenses receipts of wage types credited with - positive amount in 2nd symbolic account offsetting entry and flagged W/CO also the symbolic code linked to linked  to Temprary clearing GL it is BS GL .
    I checked all the existing threads messages but I did not get solution.
    the problem comes up from our upgradation, 6 months back we upgraded to ECC 6.
    We don't have any problems in our old 4.7 system still it is working fine.
    I created OSS but still they did not solved and they are refering all passed notes.
    could any one give the solution to come out from this problem?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Satya

    Hi Satya,
    Basically the error is because of Funds Management which you have activated. Please check the note 1268001, 701291, 558295 & 936658 but i dont know will this be helpful or not.
    Regards,
    S.Srikanth
    Edited by: SrikanthS on Oct 26, 2010 11:17 AM

  • CO account assignment on a GR/IR Account (Balance sheet Account)

    The GR/IR account line item on Goods Receipt(GR) documents picks up the account assignment ( WBS Element, Cost center or an Order) from the Purchase order account assignment.
    The GR/IR account is defined as a Balance sheet account. So it is abnormal to pick up a CO account assignment on the GR/IR account line item on a Goods receipt or Invoice document.
    I shall appreciate if some expert here lets me know if there is a fix(an OSS note)  in order for the GR/IR account NOT to pick up a CO account assignment on the subsequent documents(Goods receipt and Invoice) from the Purchase order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Vijayanth

    Hi Vijaynath,
    If you have the modules like CO, PS, FM, IM and activated the above modules, at the time of the GR system compulsarly will ask for account assignment. Because PO might be crated for a project or cost center. In the above 2 cases system will look for account assignment.
    I guess system picksup the cost center or WBS against the Raw Material account but not for the GR/IR clearing account. Please check it.
    For the raw material and asset accounts you can create statistical cost elements.
    Thanks & Regards,
    shashi kanth.

  • G/L Account default in purchase order with account assignment category K

    Hello gurus,
    when creating a new position in a purchase order with account assignment category K "Cost Center", the G/L Account No. is always filled with a default account.
    Where and how can I define, what account is used as default GL Account?
    The version is sap ecc 6.0.
    I will reward points all answer!!
    Thank you!

    Hi
    check the valaution class assigned to the material or the material group (if no material is being used)
    Now goto OBYC, Click on the transaction key GBB, for the account modifier VBR, & for the valuation clqass combination - check the G/L account.
    Based on this combination the G/L is determined auitomatically in the PO. if you chnage it here ... it will reflect in PO at the time of creation.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

Maybe you are looking for