FM GRAC_IDM_USR_ACCS_REQ_SERVICES / custom_fields_val

Hello,
I'm trying to create one authorization request via FM GRAC_IDM_USR_ACCS_REQ_SERVICES and use the badis GRFN_API_CUSTOMFIELD or GRPC_API_CUSTOMFIELD for the saving some data custom_fields_val to our Z* Tables. Some of them on the request_id level, some on the item level of the request. There is no need to retrieve the data to show them in the access request.
The links in wiki is not available - https://wiki.wdf.sap.corp/wiki/display/SAPGRC/GRC+2010+Custom+Fields
The note 1243085 could not help also.
Where can I find documentation?
Regards,
Elmira

Hi Elmira,
I also came across similar requirement where in i need to show custom fields in standard request screen and also i need to display those values back in the request screen.
For those custom fields, i have added few custom fields( as per requirement) in include of the structure : GRAC_S_API_REQ_DATA as shown below.
And in exporting parameter : CUSTOM_FIELDS_VAL of FM :
GRAC_IDM_USR_ACCS_REQ_SERVICES, i'm passing those custom fields values.
And finally the above mentioned FM will store custom fields values in table : GRACREQ as shown in below snapshot.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Thanks
KH

Similar Messages

  • Read custom field's values in GRAC_UIBB_ACCESS_REQUEST

    Hi All,
    We have added new fields in webdynpro component: GRAC_UIBB_ACCESS_REQUEST and displayed new fields in front end.
    Enhanced above webdynpro component but not able to read those new field's values inside the enhancement, as the context doesn't has new fields.
    Any help is really appreciated

    Hi Vinoth,
    I've faced a similar problem but can able to resolved and points are as below.
    1)We have created a custom WDP component(which is similar to standard GRC access request screen) which submits request to GRC  .
    2)For adding custom fields into standard access request screen, i have added custom fields to structure GRAC_S_API_REQ_DATA which has include CI_GRAC_REQ_ATTR(here we can add custom fields as per our requirement).
    3)And i've used Function module : GRAC_IDM_USR_ACCS_REQ_SERVICES which has facility to pass our custom fields data to the standard request/approver screen.
    Hope this might help you.
    Thanks
    KH

  • Emails not getting trigerrred in access request- request type = user creation

    Hi ,
    Can any one help me with solution why emails are not getting triggered in request->request type = user creation. I.e the L1 manager is not getting email when request is submitted.
    The checked SU01 regarding WF_BATCH email(email is maintained) and the request can able to identify the manager,but the manager is not getting any emails. In audit log, it shows with whom is request is pending with.And it is showing nothing in SOST and SLG1.
    The scenario is : In user creation, for a given user..if position is maintained,im submitting position based request using FM   GRAC_IDM_ORG_ASSG_REQ_SERVICES   else if position is not maintained, im submitting user based request using FM   GRAC_IDM_USR_ACCS_REQ_SERVICES(in user based request, emails are getting triggered).
    Thanks
    KH

    Hi,
    Resolved the issue by appyling Note : 1899422
    Thanks
    KH

  • Use GRAC_USER_ACCES_WS to provision Business Role

    I have situation where I need to provision several hundred users across 90 business roles. I have been experimenting with FM GRAC_IDM_USR_ACCS_REQ_SERVICES (underlying FM for enterprice service GRAC_USER_ACCES_WS) to automate mass provisioning using GRC access requests. I figured out how to use the FM to provision technical roles to users but cannot get it to work for GRC Business Roles.
    If the service cannot provision business roles, that would imply that an IdM would also not be able to do so. We are currently looking at IdM (non-SAP) solutions. Now I wonder if the value of business roles we are building will be diminished if an IdM is used.
    Is it possible to provision business roles using the service and/or FM? If so, any details on the input values required would be much appreciated.

    Hi Harinam,
    Thanks for the details. I have already raised a OSS message to SAP.
    I have implemented SAP note 1930923 in GRC sandbox system and can see that the mail issue I am reporting was no longer appearing. But I have seen new one this time
    After note implementation: (Change Account Request Type with Business Role Assignment)
    Hi GRC User Demo 1 (Z_GRAC_USER1),
    The Request number : 592 , has been processed and the Request is Closed. The details are as follows:
    XX Business role assigned to Z_GRAC_USER1
    Kind regards,
    Access Control Administrator
    Before and After note implementation: (Change Account Request Type with Business Role removal)
    Hi GRC User Demo 1 (Z_GRAC_USER9),
    The Request number : 593 , has been processed and the Request is Closed. The details are as follows:
    YY Role removed from Z_GRAC_USER9 ( )
    Kind regards,
    Access Control Administrator
    Now the issue during role assignment is resolved, but during role removal mail notification says role has been removed from user and ends with empty brackets ().
    For single roles in this brackets it usually fills the system name. May be for business roles since there will not be any specific system it is coming empty, but I think SAP should fix this.
    Let me know if you are also facing the same
    Since you confirmed that you are using business roles, let me know any critical issues which you came across as part of SP13 as we are also on SP13 and could be helpful.
    Thanks once again for taking your time in replying for my issue.
    Regards,
    Sai.

Maybe you are looking for