FOC PO with Planned Delivery Cost

Dear Experts,
I have FOC PO, but need to charge delivery cost which need to update material cost. How I can handle this case?
Thanks for your kindly helpful!

Partha,
For delivery note option, this field is not showed, only for PO option.
Does any one know any way I can bring the planned cost through delivey note?
Regards,
Marcelo.

Similar Messages

ERS for Return Items with Planned Delivery Costs also as credit

Hi
I have the requirement to process ERS-Returns (MRRL) where I need to have a credit memo for the product cost and the planned delivery costs incurred with the original order. ($15,000 for product and $1200 for delivery costs = Credit Memo for $16,200) I have tested this extensively but in all situations the planned delivery costs creates an 'invoice' not a credit memo.
Has anybody encountered this requirement? If so, were you able to resolve without implementing an enhancement?
Thanks.

For delivery costs you need to maintain the following customizing:
> OLMR
    > Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)
      > Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs
The flag controls whether to include or exclude planned delivery costs
from automatic settlement.
Regarding the planned delivery cost, it will not listed in
transaction MRRL. This is the standard SAP design. Instead, please
use transaction MRDC.

Invoice posting with planned delivery cost

Hi all,
I want to post an invoice informing the delivery note at MIRO. My PO has a planned cost, although, determining it's information through the option '2 - delivery note', the planned costs are not brought to the line.
I can't find a way how to bring it, only when I inform the PO that option is included. Is there any message I can pop up so the user knows there is a planned cost?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Marcelo Buosi.

Partha,
For delivery note option, this field is not showed, only for PO option.
Does any one know any way I can bring the planned cost through delivey note?
Regards,
Marcelo.

Planned Delivery Cost is changed during GR

Hi Experts,
PO is created with Planned Delivery Cost. When GR is created, the costs will be distributed to material cost.
However, delivery costs can be changed for each delivery.
How does SAP handle or distribute actual delivery costs into the received materials for each delivery? Where do I enter actual delivery costs with GR.
Thanks,
Sukhbold

Hi,
one option is availabe in SAP to post the unplanned delivery costs apart from the planned delivery costs,
we can post the unplanned delivery costs to material 'or' separate G/L account also,
pls check the fallowing path,
IMG-Materials Management-Logistics Invoice Verification-Incoming Invoice-Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted,
pls note that the above costs can post while doing invoice posting only
chenna kesava reddy

Return delivery and Planned delivery costs

Hi guru
scenario: I create a PO (Vendor A) with Planned delivery costs on order item.
I store planned delivery costs in the purchase order item on the Item conditions screen. ( I enter a different vendor for "freight vendor" - Vendor B, select the desired condition on the condition screen and choose Goto - Details. Overwrite the content of the Vendor field).
I create GR. OK
I create a return delivery (122) but I have to pay invoice for "freight vendor" to Vendor B.
Can I make it?

Hi,
At the time of GR;
Stock A/c - 110 - Dr
GR/IR Clearing - 100 - Cr
Freight Clearing - 10 - Cr
And when you return it then same entry gets reversed.
So at the time of MIRO, it will not propose the freight value automatically but you refer the PO and select "Planned delivery cost" and then under "GL Account" Tab, enter Freight Expense A/c - Dr and "Simulate", it will credit vendor and then Post

Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

Hi Xperts
We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
Regards
Soumick

Hi,
Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
Option-1:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
OR
Option-2:
Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
OR
Option-3:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
Based the above one setting, system will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
NOTE:
Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
Regards,
Biju K

Problem with MIRO Transaction while posting Un planned Delivery cost

Hi all,
We have entered all the details including unplanned delivery cost in transaction MIRO. When we are trying to post the same by using post button directly with out simulation, system is asking for plant details.
For first time we have entered wrong Plant details , system immediately asking again for plant details.
Next time even if we entered correct plant details, the system is coming out from the screen MIRO and it is not posting the document.
If you go through simulate button and it is working fine and it is giving Warning message, If we enter the wrong Plant details.
My Client requirement is If we post the MIRO transaction including Un planned delivery cost with Post button. If we enter wrong plant details. System will through Error message, until we enter the correct plant details.
Is there any way to do this. Pl help me in this regard.
Regards,
Ramesh

In the MIRO T Code, U can see PO reference tab is there, Just below it there is Purchase order/scheduling agreement field is there . enter the purchase order number in blank field next to Purchase order/scheduling agreement and press enter. U can see it will take the required data automatically.
hope this helps
regards

Tax code error while posting Planned delivery costs in Import Scenario

Hi!!!!!
I am getting on error while posting Planned delivery costs in MIRO for Import Purchase Order with zero value tax code v0. The error is
"Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZAXINN"
For Import I defined a pricing procedure which contains all condition types for CVD, Ecess, SEcess, Additional Customs Duty and Others.
While making Import PO im putting V0 tax code. I assigned the Tax Codes to the Company code.
Please let me know what config is missing.
Regards,
Durga

Is you ZAXINN assigned to the country India
and is your taxcode (created in FTXP) created for country India?
kr
hakan

Planned delivery cost for the scheduling agreement

Hi Experts
1. I have an requirement to post Invoice ver. for the Planned delivery cost (freight,customs duty,CVD etc) against the Scheduling Agreement just like Import Purchases with checking off the GR Based IV Indicator before doing the GR
I tried it but its giving me that no delivery costs are Planned in the Scheduling agreements it runs fine in case of the PO because PO is a time independent. Please inform how to post the same for schedule agreement with time dependent indicator on. I tried switching off the time dependent indicator and the system allowed, but my requirement is to Post I.V for the delivery cost with the time dependent indicator on.
Appreciate if you can suggest something in this case Urgently .
2. Aother issue is we have some uploaded Scheduling agreement from legacy system with Time dependent conditions. For this we need to post planned delivery cost in Miro. Since the system is not allowing to post, how to about for this. Shall we enter the delivery cost in unplanned delivery cost in Miro and post. Please suggest if any alternate solution is available.
Regards
Arvind

Hi,
As you know if the delivery cost document is not posted during GR the
delivery cost is not proposed during invoice (MIRO). Planned delivery
cost will be proposed in invoice only when there are records in EKBZ
table. The EKBZ table will be updated when delivery cost is posted
during GR itself.
Please ensure in the PO itself thatr the conditions have been defined
properly with the relevant amounts and values.
During GR when planned delivery cost conditions are present in PO,
system checks for values in amount field. Then only appropriate
calculations will be done for delivery cost and planned delivery cost
document will posted during GR and hence updates EKBZ table.
Solution to this issue is described in below steps,
1) reverse the invoice document
2) reverse GR document.
3) You have to give values in amount field in relevant conditions ZGDS
   in the PO.
   If you face any issues changing the values, delete above conditions
   and put it again manually and give values in amount field also.
4) Post GR once again, delivery cost document will also be posted.
   You can check it in PO history.
5) During invoice select Item + planned delivery cost and post the
   invoice. If you need planned delivery cost to be posted separately,
   then you can post individual invoice for item and delivery cost.
Please note it is not possible to post delivery costs for documents with
multiple accountassignments.
For your second question, I am afraid I can not answer. Please open a new ntry in the forum, so that someone else can answer it.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Bapi to post planned delivery cost of a purchase order

Hi every body,
         Can anybody please give me the full details of the planned delivery cost data
to post with BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
what are the manditory fields,
I am using the following code , but a few are posting , remaining r not posting
but when I post the same through MIRO it is posted what is difference
this error was came
ERROR: enter good reciept data only when working with GR-based IV
REPORT ZBAPI_MIRO                              .
tables: ekko,ekbe,ekpo,lfa1,EKBZ,t000.
data: itemdata like BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEM occurs 0 with header line,
headerdata like BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_HEADER occurs 0 with header line,
     return like BAPIRET2 occurs 0 with header line,
     DOC_NO LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-INV_DOC_NO,
     FISC_YEAR LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-FISC_YEAR.
DATA:error_flag.
data: item_data like EK08BN occurs 0 with header line.
data: begin of itab occurs 0,
             p_order like ekpo-ebeln,
             p_item like ekpo-ebelp,
             p_ctype like konv-kschl,
             p_lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
      end of itab.
data: order(10) type N,
      vendor(10) type N.
data: begin of it_doc occurs 0,
            DOC_NO LIKE BAPI_INCINV_FLD-INV_DOC_NO,
            p_order like ekko-ebeln,
      end of it_doc.
PARAMETERS: fn LIKE rlgrap-filename OBLIGATORY.
DATA: FN1 TYPE STRING,
     l .
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR fn. "p_file.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4_FILENAME'
       EXPORTING
            field_name = 'FN'
       IMPORTING
            file_name = fn.
START-OF-SELECTION.
   FN1 = FN.
PERFORM upload.
loop at itab.
CLEAR: EKBZ,EKPO,LFA1,ITEM_DATA,HEADERDATA,itemdata.
REFRESH:itemdata,HEADERDATA,ITEM_DATA.
order = itab-p_order.
itab-p_order = order.
vendor = itab-P_lifnr.
itab-p_lifnr = vendor.
select single * from ekbz where ebeln = order
                           and ebelp = itab-p_item
                          and kschl = itab-p_ctype
                          and bewtp = 'F'.
select single * from ekpo where ebeln = order
                       and ebelp = itab-p_item.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM LFA1 WHERE LIFNR = vendor.
clear: item_data.
refresh:item_data.
call function 'ME_READ_COND_INVOICE'
   exporting
   I_BUDAT            =
    I_EBELN            = itab-p_order
    I_EBELP            = itab-p_item
   I_FRBNR            = ' '
     i_lifnr            = ' '
   I_XBLNR            = ' '
   RE_KURSF           =
   RE_WAERS           =
   I_RESWK            = ' '
   I_EKKI             = 'X'
   I_BUBIS            =
   RE_WWERT           =
   XEK08B_FLAG        =
   I_BELNR            =
   I_BUZEI            =
   I_READ_KRUEK       = ' '
   I_DISPLAY          = ' '
TABLES
    XEK08BN            = item_data
   XEK08BN_CURR       =
read table item_data with key kschl = itab-P_ctype.
headerdata-INVOICE_IND = 'X'.
headerdata-DOC_TYPE = 'KR'.
headerdata-DOC_DATE = ekbz-budat.
headerdata-PSTNG_DATE = SY-DATUM.
headerdata-REF_DOC_NO = itab-P_ORDER.
headerdata-COMP_CODE = 'HPL'.
headerdata-DIFF_INV = itab-p_lifnr.
headerdata-CURRENCY_ISO = ekbz-waers.
headerdata-GROSS_AMOUNT = item_data-WEWWR - item_data-AREWR .
headerdata-BLINE_DATE = SY-DATUM.
headerdata-DEL_COSTS_TAXC = 'V0'.
headerdata-PO_REF_NO = itab-P_ORDER.
headerdata-bus_area = 'OTHR'.
headerdata-ITEM_TEXT = LFA1-NAME1.
*headerdata-HEADER_TXT = .
headerdata-ALLOC_NMBR = itab-P_ORDER.
APPEND HEADERDATA.
CLEAR HEADERDATA.
itemdata-INVOICE_DOC_ITEM = '00001' .
itemdata-PO_NUMBER = itab-P_ORDER.
itemdata-PO_ITEM = itab-P_ITEM.
*itemdata-REF_DOC = ekbz-belnr.
itemdata-REF_DOC_YEAR = ekbz-gjahr.
itemdata-REF_DOC_IT = itab-P_ITEM.
itemdata-TAX_CODE = 'V0'.
itemdata-ITEM_AMOUNT = item_data-WEWWR - item_data-AREWR .
itemdata-QUANTITY = item_data-BPWEM - item_data-BPREM .
itemdata-PO_UNIT = ekpo-meins.
itemdata-PO_PR_UOM = ekpo-meins.
itemdata-COND_TYPE = itab-P_CTYPE.
*itemdata-ITEM_TEXT = .
append itemdata.
clear itemdata.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE'
EXPORTING
    HEADERDATA       = HEADERDATA
IMPORTING
    INVOICEDOCNUMBER = DOC_NO
    FISCALYEAR       = FISC_YEAR
TABLES
    ITEMDATA         = ITEMDATA
   ACCOUNTINGDATA   = I_ACCOUNTINGDATA
   TAXDATA          = I_TAX
    RETURN           = RETURN.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
message e999(re) with 'Problem occured'.
else.
loop at return.
    if not return is initial.
     clear bapi_retn_info.
     move-corresponding return to bapi_retn_info.
      if return-type = 'A' or return-type = 'E'.
        error_flag = 'X'.
      endif.
     append bapi_retn_info.
    endif.
endloop.
if error_flag = 'X'.
   message e999(re) with 'Problem occured'.
    rollback work.
else.
      Return Table from BAPI call is empty
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        WAIT   = 'X'
      IMPORTING
        RETURN = RETURN.
endif.
endif.
       write:/ 'Document no :', doc_no.
       it_doc-doc_no = doc_no.
       it_doc-p_order = itab-p_order.
       append it_doc.
       CLEAR IT_DOC.
endloop.
loop at it_doc.
   if it_doc-doc_no = ' '.
      write:/ 'purchase order not posted ' , it_doc-p_order.
   else.
   write:/ 'document no:' , it_doc-doc_no, 'p.order:' , it_doc-p_order.
endif.
endloop.
*&      Form upload
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
form upload .
CALL function 'GUI_UPLOAD'
exporting
    filename                      = FN1
   FILETYPE                      = 'ASC'
HAS_FIELD_SEPARATOR           = ' '
HEADER_LENGTH                 = 0
READ_BY_LINE                  = 'X'
DAT_MODE                      = ' '
CODEPAGE                      = ' '
IGNORE_CERR                   = ABAP_TRUE
REPLACEMENT                   = '#'
CHECK_BOM                     = ' '
NO_AUTH_CHECK                 = ' '
IMPORTING
FILELENGTH                    =
HEADER                        =
tables
    data_tab                      = ITAB
EXCEPTIONS
FILE_OPEN_ERROR               = 1
FILE_READ_ERROR               = 2
NO_BATCH                      = 3
GUI_REFUSE_FILETRANSFER       = 4
INVALID_TYPE                  = 5
NO_AUTHORITY                  = 6
UNKNOWN_ERROR                 = 7
BAD_DATA_FORMAT               = 8
HEADER_NOT_ALLOWED            = 9
SEPARATOR_NOT_ALLOWED         = 10
HEADER_TOO_LONG               = 11
UNKNOWN_DP_ERROR              = 12
ACCESS_DENIED                 = 13
DP_OUT_OF_MEMORY              = 14
DISK_FULL                     = 15
DP_TIMEOUT                    = 16
OTHERS                        = 17
endform.                    " upload

I think you need to implement user-exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_012 of enhancement MM06E005.
Look in OSS with seach term MM06E005 to get some examples.
Note310154 "ME21N/ME51N: Customer-specific check, generating error log" has some examples.
You should use the macros to set errors/warnings
Example:
mmpur_business_obj_id pt_ekpo-id.
mmpur_metafield mmmfd_partners.
mmpur_message_forced 'W' '00' '208' text-001 '' '' ''.
regards,
JG

Planned Delivery Cost in MIRO for different freight vendor

Hi,
Kindly share, how to get rid of above issue:
1) PO created with a freight condition (FRA1 with a different vendor assigned to it under item conditions tab)
2) GR done, & all accounting entries were OK, (including freight costs in FR1 or FR3)
3) while doing MIRO with selection Planned-Delivery-Cost, Amount & Qty fields are "Blank" and auto flowing from Clearing A/cs
I found this error in both Domestic or Import POs.
I've read many threads, but could not find a clear solutions for the same.
Plz help
Sankar

Hi,
Plz find screens.
Amount & Qty fields not flowing in MIRO from open GRIR/clearing account balance.

Planned delivery cost in Import of Assets Materail

Hi,
I have a scenario, where we are purchasing (Import) Assets material from abroad. for this we have created Import PO with account assignment A. assigned the planned delivery cost in Condition Viz. Sea freight, Custom Duty, CHA charges and individual vendor also assigned at condition level.
We have posted the MIRO for Custome Duty and Done the GR. Excise Invoice also Captured and posted. While posting the invoice of other Delivery cost after GR system is not showing any value in MIRO line item.
Where as in normal inport cycle Value in Planned delivery cost IV (after GR) is appearing itself.
Please guide how to Post Delievry cost IV in above scenario. we donot want to enter any amount manual in MIRO line item.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjan Kumar

Hi Ranjan,
The idea with MIRO is to enter the vendor invoice that you got on paper, i.e. the gross amount, the tax amount(s) and the net item amounts - all from the vendor invoice. For this reason the defaulted amounts shouldn't be necessary.
If your business case is different, then there's a workaround. MIRO only suggests amounts if two cases:
- PO doesn't have provision for GR ("GR" flag on the tab "Delivery") or
- PO does have provision for GR and the received qty up to day is higher than the total invoiced qty up to day.
I have however used a user exit to make MIRO think the GR flag in the PO is not set. The user exit is the enhancement point MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE_01 of the enh. spot ES_SAPLMRMC located right in the beginning of the function MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE. The function module receives the GR flag from the PO in the parameter I_MRM_PROP-WEPOS. Let your enhancement reset the flag and make MIRO believe the GR flag in the PO is not set. Then it will propose the PO qty and amount.
However, let me underline again - the idea with MIRO is that you should type in the invoice that you hold your hand.
BR
Raf

Issue in MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

Hi,
We are facing a problem during MIRO (Planned Delivery Cost)...
First, We create Two PO's with Freight Value (use diff. vendors in both PO). During MIRO (including both PO), we done Invoicing with Goods / Service Items...when we are trying to create MIRO of Freight value (Planned Delivery Cost)... a pop-up open for choose the Vendor...
Here, Issue is that only 2 Vendors should be there BUT there shows many vendors to choose..
Please guide, how to solve this...During MIRO only 2 vendor should appear in that pop-up window...
thanks

HI,
Here, Issue is that only 2 Vendors should be there BUT there shows many vendors to choose..
many vendor means how match all vendor list?
have you activate vendor partner function at your end ? if yes check following things
check vendor master record and check Invoicing party of that vendor ,also check invoice party of main vendor
you may get invoicing party of both vendor there
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Not to Post Planned Delivery Cost in IV before MIGO

Dear Experts,
We are maintaining the Delivery cost Condition values for different vendors in Purchase Order and we are selecting the GR Based IV check box. At the time of MIRO before making MIGO (Goods receipt) it will not allow to Post Incoming Invoice if I select Goods/Service items or both Goods/Service items & Planned Delivery Cost but it will allow if we select only Planned Delivery Cost to Post.
Kindly suggest us if anybody have the solution to restrict to Post the Planned Delivery cost before posting the Goods Receipt (MIGO).
Thanks & regards,
Dhanu

Dear,
First u do the MIGO, After that post the Material IV with goods/service, after that u again do IV for planned delivery cost selection of Planned delivery cost.
Thanks,
If this is helpful for u then reward me.

Planned delivery cost(in PO), but like to pay other vendor(in MIRO). How?

To someone who knows planned delivery cost very well:
I have 3 points.
1. Planned delivery cost(in PO), but like to pay other vendor(in MIRO). How?
2. Condition type for Planned delivery cost, like FRA1, FRB1,ect, have Acc. key& Accrual key like FRE, FR1 in PO pricing procedure(calculation schema), it controls dlv cost value into Mat. stock value, but we like to post those value into a expense account, it is possible by cond. type FRA1 or FRB1, how?
3. I did testing, I have impression, for cond.type of planned dlv cost, FRA1 or FRB1, SAP always credits the dlv cost value into Accrual/provision clearing account(after GR) and debit to clear the account after MIRO. Is it correct? If yes, why in condition type configuration, it has an indicator Accrual , this indicator seems to have no difference whether it selected or non-selected.
Thanks,
[email protected]

1)while doing the miro,in the details tab give Inv. Party as ur other vendor code.
also at the right hand side where u can select the layout,just above it choose planned delivery cost and proceed with ur miro.
regards,
indranil

FOC PO with Planned Delivery Cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for