Folder level permissions

1) Can the following be executed at a folder level?
     a) doc.AddAnnotation
     b) doc.AddField
     c) field.AddEvent

Thanks!
3)
At folder level: Can one add an EVENT to a field and then as it's code in the event make it call another method.
Example:
ExistingField.AddEvent("onclick", "ExistingFunction()");
// where first param is the event, second param is the Jscript to execute when 'clicked'
function ExistingFunction()

Similar Messages

Portal Content - Folder level Permissions

Hi Experts,
The standard Portal Content Folder allows a developer to create any folders, iviews & other objects inside that folder.
But Users don't get access to delete the Portal Content Folder itself.
Now i am trying to set a folder & trying to give access to developers to create their stuff inside that folder ,,, When i give Full Control on that folder they can create edit objects inside but at the same time there is a fair chance that they delete the folder by mistake.
How do i restrict this?... One should have access to create objects inside the folder but not delete the folder itself.!
regards,
Shawn.

Hi Shawn,
Please check the [Permission Inheritance Model|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ep60sp2/helpdata/en/f6/2604e905fd11d7b84200047582c9f7/content.htm] of PCD. The guide one [Setting Permissions|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ep60sp2/helpdata/en/f6/2604db05fd11d7b84200047582c9f7/content.htm] can be helpful to make sure that the Root Folder you are planing should not pass the Inherited permission to it's sub-trees if it is restricted to display only explicitly.
Regards,
Dipanjan

Exchange, trying to make a change (via powershell) to all users & resources folder level permissions.

The command I am trying to use is not working, I need to change the default users folder permissions for every user and resource in our Org but only on the deleted items folder. If I use the -identity it works for individual changes, but I need to make this
happen for everyone. I have done things like this in the past but never to just a folder. Hopefully someone out there can help with this.
Get-Mailbox -OrganizationalUnit test | Set-MailboxFolderPermission "deleted items" -user default -AccessRights contributor
The input object cannot be bound to any parameters for the command either because the command does not take pipeline
input or the input and its properties do not match any of the parameters that take pipeline input.
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (test:PSObject) [Set-MailboxFolderPermission], ParameterBindingException

Hi Chad,
Here's something to get you moving in the right direction:
$mailboxes = Get-Mailbox -OrganizationalUnit Test
ForEach ( $mailbox in $mailboxes ) {
#Do things in here on the individual mailbox.
#This example selects the name property
$mailbox | Select Name
EDIT: Link to syntax:
http://ss64.com/ps/foreach.html
EDIT2: Hah, never mind. See jrv's post below.
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Maybe there's still a chance for hope, over 12,000+ strong and growing)

ACL's the best way to go for XSAN Folder level access.. Doesn't look it..

Looking to restrict a particular user from seeing an entire XSAN Volume. I do want the user to mount the volume but only see and Read/Write to a handful of Folders. Other users need to R/W to his folder but he cannot modify or even see anyone elses..
Kind of a modified guest account.
Any ideas? I see that using ACL's might get a little dodgy, and since its a XSAN in a FCP enviroment, I don't need any Permission issues..
Perhaps Folder Level Permissions?
TIA...
CH-

I would also recommend using workflow rules for finding your specific approvers, as for using the org structure see Whether or not to use HR organizational module in workflow rules?
For the number and type of approvers needed, if it's not a very complex set of decisions you can use the workflow template development tools (if/case/loop etc.).
Very complex decisions will probably require z-tables to help you keep the data maintained - although using classification to find approval paths as done in the purchasing release strategy is possible I would not recommend since it's harder to read in my opinion.

Permit SharePoint group to have contribute access at Folder level only and read permission at library level.

Is it possible to Permit SharePoint group to have contribute access at Folder level only and read permission at library level.
Ashish Baranwal To know what you know and what you do not know, that is true knowledge

Hi Ashish,
You can have special permissions for individual lists or libraries (or folders within a library) what you have to do is to go
to the manage permissions list or document library for the appropriate item or folder and stop inheriting permissions from Parent and then you can add any sorts of permissions you want uniquely to that item or folder.
Check for further reference.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18203.sharepoint-2013-break-document-library-permissions-inheritance.aspx
you have to break the inheriting permission of document library and assign the permission you want again you have to set the same for folder
level.
For your better understaning the concept check here
http://blog.pentalogic.net/2010/11/sharepoint-permissions-what-why-and-how-part-1-basic-principles/
While you probably won't come across this in your case, be careful when breaking security permission inheritance on the items in a a document
library or list. There are big performance hits. If you have inherited permissions on a library or list SharePoint only has to do one permissions check for all the contents. If you have unique permissions SharePoint has to check every document's permissions
before returning the contents of the library. This tends to become an issue when you have thousands of items, rather than
hundreds.
Krishana Kumar http://www.mosstechnet-kk.com
Please mark the replies and Proposed as answer if they help and solve your issue

Always Get Edit Link When Item Level Permissions Set

We've enabled item-level permissions in a folder, and all users receive the "edit folder" button, regardless of whether we've given them "manage" access. Turning off item-level permissions removes the edit link.
Is this a known issue? Any workaround/solution?

That's just a "feature" of item level security, I don't think Oracle has any plans to fix it in 3.0.9X they probably have resolved the issuse in 9.0.2 ..... If you really need it gone you can click "Edit Defaults" when editing the page, right next to the portlet and uncheck the box that says show "Show Edit Link".. But then you just taken away the easy ability of editing the items through the portlet and you have to go back to the Content Area to update anything.
brad

User Level permissions (ACLs) - HOW?

Dear Expert,
One more victim of Mackeeper writing to you seeking help...
I tried my best to remove it from the comp and I have succeded.
However, I am stuck at 2 points:
1) How User Level permissions (ACLs)? Please guide....
2) Mackeeper keeps opening pages in safari on its own, whenever I open a new tab. Please GUIDE.
Please help.....
Look forward to receiving valuable inputs.
Regards,
Sony Thadani

There is no need to download anything to solve this problem.
You may have installed the "Downlite" or "VSearch" ad-injection malware. Follow the instructions on this Apple Support page to remove it. It's been reported that some variants of the malware block access to the page. If that happens, start in safe mode by holding down the shift key at the startup chime, then try again.
Back up all data before making any changes.
One of the steps in the article is to remove malicious Safari extensions. Do the equivalent in the Chrome and Firefox browsers, if you use either of those. If Safari crashes on launch, skip that step and come back to it after you've done everything else.
If you don't find any of the files or extensions listed, or if removing them doesn't stop the ad injection, then you may have an adware variant not covered by the support article. Ask for instructions in that case.
The problem may have started when you downloaded and ran an application called "MPlayerX." That's the name of a legitimate free movie player, but the name is also used fraudulently to distribute VSearch. If there is an item with that name in the Applications folder, delete it, and if you wish, replace it with the genuine article from mplayerx.org.
This malware is often found on illegal websites that traffic in pirated content such as movies. If you, or anyone else who uses the computer, visit such sites and follow prompts to install software, you can expect more of the same, and worse, to follow. Never install any software that you downloaded from a bittorrent, or that was downloaded by someone else from an unknown source.
In the Security & Privacy pane of System Preferences, select the General tab. The radio button marked Anywhere should not be selected. If it is, click the lock icon to unlock the settings, then select one of the other buttons. After that, don't ignore a warning that you are about to run or install an application from an unknown developer.
Still in System Preferences, open the App Store or Software Update pane and check the box marked
Install system data files and security updates
if it's not already checked.

Getting top level permissions?

Hello.
We have a bunch of folders on a fileserver that has folders shared directly to people instead of AD Groups. I want to get all top level permissions (IE the ones not inherited) and display the top level folder("the root folder") and the usernames
which have access to it.
With that information i will create Groups and share to the Group et cetera.
Is this possible to do powershell? How would i go about doing it?
Any tips welcome!

You could try
this module's Get-AccessControlEntry function. There is a screenshot on its download page that shows sample output. It also has a switch parameter to only show non-inherited ACEs. You could look at permissions at the root folder only, or you could show
non-inherited ACEs for any folders under the root:
Get-AccessControlEntry c:\root -NotInherited
dir c:\root -recurse | Get-AccessControlEntry -NotInherited
The results can be exported to a CSV, where each line will include, among other things, the path, the type of ACE (allow, deny), the principal, the access mask, and whether or not it is inherited.
You can also use the Select-Object and/or Group-Object cmdlets on the results to further analyze the permissions.
Let me know if you're interested in the module and have any questions about it.

Folder level script? How can I use field value as a pdf filename in save as dialog box

I read somewhere that if you use a folder level script, you can do things like save a pdf with a specific filename - possibly based on a field name.
How would one set up a folder level script?
How do you execute a script from the PDF?
What code would you use to change the PDF name to the contents of the fFieldName text field?
Or, is this really just impossible to do?

The article is interesting. It suggests you place code like this:
// Page Replacement Function
var ReplaceLastPage = app.trustedFunction( function(cPath) {
app.beginPriv();
this.replacePages(this.numPages-1, cPath); app.endPriv();
In the trusted folder. What is the path of the trusted function(s) that get automatically loaded into Acrobat?
I assume in the example above, function(cPath) is a function inside of the PDF...

Workflow not triggering when changing Item-level Permissions in Sharepoint 2013 list

Scenario:
We have a custom list in Sharepoint 2013 that we use for Case Management. We have a workflow that triggers on a created item generated from an email. The user then gets a reply with a link to his own case.
I want the users only to be able to see their own cases and no one elses. When I change this under
Advanced Settings under List Settings and
Item-level Permissions and set them to Read items that were created by the user
and Create items and edit items that were created by the user
the workflow doesn´t trigger.
How can I resolve this? I've tried every possible out-of-the-box permissions but with no result. Help!
Thanks in advance!
// Browncreek

When you're testing , remember you cant trigger declarative workflow from the System Account - you need a general user account for auto-trigger workflows. Good luck!
Chris McNulty MCSE/MCTS/MSA/MVTSP | blog http://www.chrismcnulty.net/blog | twitter @cmcnulty2000 Microsoft Community Contributor Award 2011
Hi, I have the same problem. Except that I am not using an email to create a new item. The item is created by members of a SharePoint group that have Contribute access to the list. When use the same settings i.e.
Read items that were created by the user and Create items and edit items that were created by the user,
the workflow does not trigger. If I set it back to Real all items and Create
and Edit all items, it triggers the workflow.
Please help me resolve as I have rolled this out to pilot users and am having this trouble.
Thanks,
Vishal

Acrobat X Standard User: How can I view PDF metadata from a folder level?

Hello All,
This is my first post to this community. I would not be surprised if the answer to my question can be found in a simple search or tutorial. However, I assure you that I have been searching, clicking, reading and even attempting to install new software all morning and have only succeeded in further confusing myself.
I'm running Adobe Acrobat X Standard on a Windows 7 machine. My job includes the management of legal documents of conveyance. All conveyance instruments have a set of unique identifiers such as the county where the deed was filed, the book and page where it is filed, the type of instrument, and the date it was filed. Historically I have tried to jam all of this information and more into the file name of a pdf. For example: "105_Bk109-Pg188_Assignment_05251950" is the name of a file that I have open right now that indicates an Assignment filed in Crockett County, Texas (code 105) at Book 109, Page 188 and recorded on May 25, 1950. I typically work in folders that contain around a hundred similar documents with all of the fields I have described varying. My objective is to begin moving this information into the metadata or properties of the individual PDFs AND then be able to view those fields in Windows Explorer from the folder level. As I understand it, this is not possible. When I began searching for an alternative solution, I found several references to Adobe Bridge and attempted to install it. The installation failed, but more importantly I am not interested in becoming a CC user as I don't feel like it is necessary for what I am trying to accomplish. I'm not working with HD photos or video.
So my question is this: Is there a way (that doesn't involve purchasing and learning Adobe Bridge) that I can modify the attributes/metadata/properties of a pdf, and then see the modifications in a folder viewer without opening the pdf? Thanks in advance for your help.

Thanks for responding. I suspected that my understanding of metadata was incomplete or inaccurate. As I understand it, the metadata for any given pdf can be found by first opening the pdf; clicking File -> Properties, which opens a dialog box titled "Document Properties". The first tab in the dialog box is "Description" and includes the fields File, Title, Author, Subject, and Keywords. The values for these fields are what I'm referring to as metadata. Additionally, from the Document Properties dialog box, clicking on the "Custom" tab allows you to create custom properties and values, which I also considered to be metadata. I have manipulated these fields for a certain pdf as shown in the two screenshots below:
After making this changes, I saved the pdf and closed it. I then navigated to the folder where the pdf is stored using Windows Explorer. As you can in the following screen shot of WE, that the pdf I have made the changes to is the first in the list. The Windows Explorer columns include: Title, Pages, Author, and Subjects, but their values are all blank and fail to show what I have assigned them in the PDF properties (or what I thought was metadata). As for my custom fields, Windows does not give me any kind of option to display those. Windows inability to display something as simple as the number of pages in the PDF is completely baffling to me.
My objective is to be able to modify the standard document properties of a PDF with usable information, those being Title , Author, Subject, and Keywords. I would also like to be able to create the custom properties with additional useful information. I would then like to be able to use a file manager, to view the contents of a folder full of pdfs, similar to the screenshot above, and see the properties and custom field values that i have assigned to the pdfs in columns of the list of pdfs. Windows Explorer is the only file manager I have ever used. It's possible that the solution to my problem could be as simple as changing file managers. It may be that what I'm after is not possible at. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Need help with folder level javascript to automate "save button" on a fillable form

I have been racking my brain for the past 6 hours trying to get a simple save button to work.
Background: I am using Acrobat Pro 11 to create a save button on a fillable form. My intent is for the end users (my team of 3, whos computers I have access to) to be able to fill out the form, click save, and have the filename appended with date and other info and saved to a local folder on their machine.
I am attempting to take the default form name i.e. Support Call Log.pdf and have three of the feilds within the form generate a new file name. --> Support Call Log_Brad_121_2015
End users will fill out the form using adobe viwer X.
Instead of putting the code that I have tried, modified, and tried again and again. I would like to ask for a fresh start and then see if I can locate my error after. I need to know what to put in my folder level script, line for line.
I also need to know the correct syntax and format to establish a new file name with the extracted feild data, saved to the same exact file path as the original document.
Any and all help will be greatly appreciated, I am about to go crazy!!!

Didn't let me do it, invalid. So, here is what I have now changed my button code to:
//get field value
var fv1 = getField("Technician:").value;
var fv2 = getField("Date Received:").value;
var fv3 = getField("Unit Number:").value;
// Split Path into an array so it is easy to work with
var aMyPath = this.path.split("/");
// Remove old file name
aMyPath.pop();
var NewFileName = "Support Call Log" + "_" + fv1 + "_" + fv2 + "_" + fv3 + ".pdf";
NewFileName = NewFileName.replace(/[\s\!\?\<\>\'\"\*\/\\\=\?\^\`\{\}\|\~]+/g, "_");
aMyPath.push(NewFileName);
//save
mySaveAs(this,aMyPath.join("/"));
Im still getting the error dialogue box, and nothing shows in my javascript debugger window when I click the button. Seems to be something goofy with my Folder level script:
var mySaveAs = app.trustedFunction(
     function(oDoc, cPath, cFlName)
          cPath = cPath.replace(/([^/})$/, "$1/");
          try{
               oDoc.saveas(cPath + cFlName);
               catch(e){
                              app.alert("Error During Save");

Defining metadata at the folder level.

We are migrating from Content DB to Webcenter Content 11.1.1.7, using FrameworkFolders.
Our old Content Management solution (Content DB), allowed us to define metadata on a folder level. For example a group of metadata (a category in Content DB) could be defined and applied to a specific folder. When documents are uploaded, the server enforces the metadata to be populated for all documents uploaded to that folder and all child folders.
Webcenter Content seems to behave quite differently. From what I can tell, this is set up in the "Configuration Manager" Admin applet. Metadata fields are defined in the "Information Fields" tab. Sets of fields are defined as a "Rule". Roles are enforced on uploaded content through "Profiles". A given profile is enforced by the user of a "Trigger". The trigger is specified to look at a specific field, which is global to everything on the server. This is all documented here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/doc.1111/e10978/c04_metadata.htm#DAFJDCEH
Having the trigger field be global seems to be very restrictive. We will have several different systems storing content on the server. Isn't this a big limitation of the product?
How can create a rule to enforce metadata to be populated for all content that is uploaded to a folder?
Thanks!

I'd say the answer is: create a folder and assign it a set of metadata (and inherit, if you will).
I don't think WebCenter Content, or UCM, has a concept equal to the mentioned category as described; i.e. an object that represents a metadata settings that can be assigned to 'something'. There are, however, many concepts that are close:
- rules/profiles mentioned in the initial posts - a profile (consisting of rules) may correlate to a "content type". It defines what fields make sense for this particular content item, what is required, default, etc. (relationship between fields). The caveat is that profiles define actually just how content items behave in the GUI; (global) rules can enhance also back-end processing (e.g. fill in an automated contentID identifier, if missing), but in reality they don't define data model
- folders - folders help to define hierarchy on items. As Srinath explained, we can also benefit from propagation of metadata, or inheritance. This is probably the closest concept to the Content DB category, but the holder is not the category, but the folder itself. Keep also in mind that folder is an optional parameter, and metadata inherited from a folder can be overriden for both items and folders
- in URM, where the categorization is more strict is another hierarchical structure; retention category (which can be assigned other settings, esp. disposition rules, and which can contain retention folders)
- yet, another concept that might be useful in some use cases are folios; a folio is an item (XML-file) that has its own metadata, and can reference other content items. However, operations on a folio item OOTB does not affect contained content items, and a content item can be referenced by several folios.
Finally, if no standard concept helps, you may always create your own customization via filters. A filter is a Java piece of code, which can be "hooked" to standard events (like "uploading a file", or check-in as it is called in UCM) and which can do whatever validation you like. For instance, I created a component which checks that an assigned quota on a folder to which an item is uploaded is not exceeded.
I assume that for your use case, you might be good to go with a combination of folders and profiles (a profile setting can also be assigned to a folder as default metadata). Let us know if you get stuck.

DIR Search at Folder Level

Hi all,
Is SAP DMS has the functionality to search the document using classification within the Particular Folder. so far i have only seen the document Search is at classification charateristics or at the Document Text level.
Pls Let me know, whether Searching at folder level is possible or not?
Regards,
S Anand

hi,
Find in Structure
To find the folder in the SAP Easy Document Management structure in which a document was originally created, proceed as follows:
       1. Select a document or folder in the directory structure of SAP Easy Document Management, for example, in the Search
           Result folder.
       2. Choose Find in Structure in the context menu of the document or select the Find in Structure indicator in the search
           dialog for documents .
           Microsoft Windows Explorer highlights the folder in which you originally created the document.
Benakaraja
??p

Is it possible to install folder level script automatically by any other application ?

I want to install folder level javascript through flex application .is it possible to do this or by any other technology.
1 way to do is to copy file using file stream of that application but as directory for folder level javascript is protected one therefore file operation give i/o error
any other solution .

I do not think any Adobe product will allow you to do this for obvious reasons. '
You can use any installer program the will perform the installation for users if the users decide to allow your request.

Folder level permissions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for