Folder Structures

Hello All,
I was using iView Media Pro, until I picked up Aperture. Quick question ... since Aperture stores all photos in one library file, is there a way to get access to images from Photoshop without having to export from Aperture? Also, I am aware of showing package contents of the Aperture Library file, but this does not really do any good if I am attempting to locate a file in Photoshop.
For the record, I like Aperture. I just hope there will eventually be an easier way to gain access to pictures from the Finder.

This is a way to keep your existing file structure in aperture and then keep a separate set of smart folders which can relate to your existing file & folder system. Its not ideal & it doesn't show up in photoshop file browser but it works reasonably well.
I run a picture library & need to keep track of approx. 70,000 images. These are in lots of file formats including .jpg .tif and raw files both camera specific eg. .NEF .CRW & also files from non-supported cameras converted into .dng files.
I will use aperture as a management system to quickly look for & sort files. I would use it for some basic editing to make images for my website for example - but until it improves will need to use photoshop for raw conversion & serious editing.
Since aperture uses its own library structure which is difficult to locate i need - as i'm sure many other people need - a simple way of quickly looking through my library to find files independent of aperture. This is a method i came up with. It does however require a fair amount of planning ahead as you have to import folders into aperture one by one and then create your smart folder. When you have done that you can move onto the next one.
1) Decide on how you want to split up your existing library & make sure its organised.
I run a library which specialises in travel images of France so its organised in this way.
Main Regions of France>Sub-areas>images etc. So in real terms this works out as:
ALPS(FOLDER)>grenoble(sub-folder)>cable-car1.jpg(image) I'll use this an example & you should be able to see how it works.
2) Firstly in aperture I set up a new project called FRANCE LIBRARY.
3) I then click on it & go to Import>Folders Into a project. In this case its a folder called ALPS.
4) All the files & folders within the main folder ALPS then copy to aperture in the same structure as i've already got them organised.
5) The next step is to find those images & set up a smart folder for all the different kinds of file types within it.
6) Go to Finder>File>New Smart Folder
7) Find your Aperture Library from the menu on the left - wherever you've stored it.
8) Right click it (or cntrl + click) and click Show Package Contents
9) There should be a project file file. In my case its called FRANCE LIBRARY.approject
10) Right click it and click Show Package Contents
11) You should then see a folder with an .apimportgroup extension.
12) Open it & there are separate folders for each of the images. Each folder
includes the actual image + the adjustment etc. files.
13) In the spotlight search box ( top right hand corner) type a search criteria.
use the extension for one of the files you've got in there. eg. jpg
14) click on the + symbol (its below the search box to the right of Save)
15) 2 boxes then appear on the left called Kind & Any
16) click on Any & select Images
17) delete whatever you entered in the search box. this is an important step
as its stops the folder only displaying jpgs.
18) The folder should then display thumbnails of all the images in that .apimportgroup folder. in my case this includes .jpg .tif .dng files.
19) then click Save to name & save folder.
20) It only lets you save in one of 3 places but you can always move it
to where you want.
21) You now have a folder of thumbnails - stored wherever you choose.
22) If you right click the image you can then go to Open With & open it in whatever programme you choose. ie. photoshop.
You can then go back to aperture and import the next batch - following all the steps again.
You can obviously set up the folders how you want. You can choose to have lots of them or a few.
I do this one at a time as its easy to spot the new .apimportgroup folder. If i imported my whole library at once i'd just have one huge folder - this way i can keep them organised as i want them & in a way i'm familiar with.
This means that i can set up the same file and folder structure in aperture & within smart folders as i have in my existing library.
Its complicated & its far from ideal but it works. Even though aperture stores files in its own library they are still visible (admittedly through a complicated procedure) even if aperture ceased to exist as a programme it would still be possible to see all the images in its library by using this method. You can then copy them - burn them to dvd - back them up on another disk - ie. do the same as files in a "normal" folder. As far as i know smart folders will update if you delete from or add to them
As a way of integrating it into photoshop for converting raw files - its possible to have a smart folder containing raw files in place of photoshop bridge & then right click on the image you want to convert - click open with photoshop & the image will appear in the photoshop camera raw converter.
Aperture has some really useful features & also some features that need to be improved asap. I've emailed apple 3 times so far so i'm not a fan of it yet.
For my particular business its very useful in lots of ways - but it needs some work to be what many of us hoped it would be.
ps. if there are any errors in this please let me know. i followed the procedure through as i was typing so i am hoping its all ok.
G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

Similar Messages

  • How do I move photos in a Smart Collection and keep folder structure?

    HI there I am on a trial of Lightroom and loving it so far.  One seemingly simple task I would like to try out is moving all my RAW files (which are all mixed up with JPGs and PSDs to a new location and keep the current folder structure.
    Currently I have files strcutured like this: <main disk>\<year>\<month>\<filename>.cr2 and I would like to move these to <different disk>\<year>\<month>\<filename>.cr2
    The Export functions look as if they will put them all in to one big folder?  Any ideas?
    Many thanks in advance.

    There are several approaches to this problem. You could do this via the Folders panel in LR. You can do just about everything in the Folders panel that you can do in Explorer or Finder. Just create folder and drag and drop.
    Another way is to do this outside LR use Explorer (Windows) or FInder (Mac). after you're done then go back into LR and tell LR where to find the moved files. Depending on how many you have this could be a bit tedious.
    Another method is to choose the files you want then Export them as a Catalog. When you do this be sure to include the option to export the negatives. Point the new catalog at you other drive. It will recreate the folder structure during the export. Then remove the images from your present catalog. Don't delete from disk just remove. Now import from catalog and choose the newly exported catalog. This time choose the option to add the files without moving them. Once you are sure everything is back and is fine you can use Explorer or Finder to go into your original file structure and delete the files that were moved to the new drive.  Be careful to only choose the moved files. If you are separating the RAWs out this should be relatively easy.
    I hope that helps!

  • How can I batch move files to the same folder structure in a different location?

    Hi,
    I recently had an issue with my iTunes Library so I used the Organize Library feature to have iTunes organise my library.  What happened was that it put all of my music in a folder called 'Music' on my external hard drive, whereas previously it was not in a folder at all, e.g.
    BEFORE: External Hard Drive / Abba / Greatest Hits / Mama Mia.m4a
    AFTER: External Hard Drive / Music / Abba / Greatest Hits / Mama Mia.m4a
    I don't have any particular issue with the updated folder structure, except that I had copies of the artwork for each album in my album folders, and these weren't moved when the audio files were moved/consolidated/organised.  So I need to find a way of moving all of the artwork to the new folders, e.g.
    External Hard Drive / Abba / Greatest Hits / folder.jpg
    needs to become:
    External Hard Drive / Music / Abba / Greatest Hits / folder.jpg
    I have to do this for 3,000+ albums, and I have multiple artwork files for some albums, so I am hoping that there is a way of doing this using a batch/automated method of some kind, but I haven't been able to turn up anything yet.
    Can someone help with this?
    Thanks,
    Nick

    You can make a smart playlist containing episodes of both series and play from that. Podcasts are linked together by the URL they are served from so merging ongoing series isn't really practical.
    tt2

  • Hi. I am having trouble with the folder structure.

    I import my pictures like probably most Lightroom users.
    They go to:
    Pictures / (Year)  / (Subfolder name crated checking "Into Subfolder" during import)
    Recently, after upgrading to Yosemite, when I import to this structure, Lightroom creates a folder visually outside it. Above, the "01_Sao_Paulo" folder should appear inside 2015 while "12_Atacama" and "12_Hasselblad" under 2014. The right folders were actually created when I check them in Finder.
    And when I try to move the folders under the right folder structure, Lightroom recognizes  that the folder already exists.
    My question two questions are:
    1. How do I make the folders appear correctly under the right folder structure?
    2. How do I make Lightroom stop creating the folders outside the structure on my next imports?
    Thanks for any help.

    Back up your iPhoto library, Depress and hold the option (alt) and command keys and launch iPhoto - rebuild your iPhoto library database
    LN

  • Using Metadata to generate view as conventional folder structure

    Can Metadata be used to generate a view as the conventional folder drill-down?
    I have a list with metadata for different projects, releases, content type etc and I would like to view them in folder structure with different hierarchies, i.e. using projects--> releases--> content-type as well as release --> projects --> content-type.
    I have asked the same question at : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22693036/using-metadata-to-view-as-conventional-folder-structure

    Hi,
    If your metadata is based on a hierarchical term set you could use ‘Metadata Navigation’.
    You may have to change your information architecture a bit to accommodate this approach. More info on ‘Metadata Navigation’ here:
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/sharepoint-server-help/configure-metadata-navigation-for-a-list-or-library-HA101820113.aspx
    Hope this helps
    Cheers
    Matt

  • How to make file folder structure from virtual folders

    lv 2013 sp1
    This is the layout of an example project, (please don't mind the horrible naming)
    When i create a source distribution.. no matter what settings I try, the preview is always like this:
    But I want the folder structure from the build to become as the virtual folder structure. is there any way of doing this without moving them by hand in the file explorer tab?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Unless you use auto-populating folders (which I don't like), the virtual folders are not meant to reflect the location on disk, so it certainly won't be automatic.
    I don't have experience with source distribution, but other build types have the option of configuring destination folders in the Destinations category and then assigning these destinations to items in the projects (including virtual folders, which then takes all the elements inside it) either in the same category or in the one under it, I can't check. I expect that you can do the same in a source distribution.
    Try to take over the world!

  • How can I batch Save For Web and maintain a multilevel folder structure?

    First... I am using an old version of Photoshop.... 6.0 to be exact.  If your answer is to buy the newer versions, I respectfully say I know that's AN answer, but I'm looking for something that will work with my setup.  The version we have works just fine for the very few things we need it for, and we use new versions of InDesign and Acrobat for all else. 
    So here's the challenge:
    We have a weekly magazine featuring 1,200 plus photos of cars for sale, each saved in a folder named for the sales rep, week and day.  I must maintain these folder structure throughout the process, as the files names are duplicated by cameras and across reps.  So I cannot dump all batch converted pics into one single folder, yet I need to reduce the Quality setting which I find when completing a Save As in Photoshop.
    So I want to batch convert all the photos in multiple folders, some 3 folders deep, all at once....  reduce to 8 inches across, change to 72dpi, and reduce the quality slider to 5, which creates a nice 60-90K file.  BUT.... it wants to save all of them in a particular folder.  I need to just overwrite the original file with the new smaller one.... or save the new small version into the same folder the big one is in, but have it work with the "include all sub-folders" option in batch. 
    A sample File system .... 4513 Photos - Color <day of week> (3 folders) - <disk number><rep>Color (20 folders) - actual photos.
    After converting, we push up the final level of folder to our website and that organization allows us to use them there the way we need.  The uploading to the site and batch functions are done 3 to 4 times per week.... on different days.
    Is there a way to reduce the quality (compression) of the jpgs that does not require the creation of a new file in a particular folder, or is there a way to have the resulting file just drop back into the folders and subfolders during a batch function?  I just can't figure this out!
    As an alternative, what other programs might do this?

    You should be able to just use the html output of the Export for Web function and, if the video's converted correctly, just swap the file names at the appropriate places. Have you tried renaming VisualHub's output to what the Export for Web html wants, then placing it in the proper location?
    I'm not aware of a way to batch create the html files, but if I had to, I'd probably look at automator to see if I could figure out it's text manipulation options.

  • WEIRD! AVCHD folder structure saved on HD appears different in Mountain Lion?

    I saved all my old SD card contents fully onto an external hard drive.
    Since saving I have upgraded from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion.
    Today I opened  the saved SD cards to find that the folder structure had altered dramatically.
    It appears to be simplified and the "Private" folder is no longer a folder but a QT type file which when double-clicked opens in QT Player.
    All the clips appear to be there and capable of being used but everything is drastically different.
    Any idea what has happened  .  .  .  .  is it ML related?

    There seems to be no way of importing AVCHD video without copying it.
    When it's in the camera you need to copy it but if it's stored on a HD there is no need but you are given no choice.

  • Exchange 2007,  Contacts and Calendar OK , Email only folder structure

    Hi, as i was reading many different topics I found that many of them had mixed answers between Exchange 2003, Exchange 2003 and 2007. Because of this mess, i wanted to focus ONLY on *EXCHANGE 2007*. That´s been said...
    I have configured my iPhone with the user/pass/domain/address/SSL-ON, the iPhone connects to exchange and syncronize correctly Contacts and Calendar but not the Email. Email just shows folder structure.
    After this first failed attempt I installed the certificate (Unsigned according to iphone and contains "Root Certificate")... No Improvement
    I contacted my IT department , they said that Activesync was supposedly ON in my user profile and that SSL was mandatory. They also said that they cannot start testing thoroughly because it would disroupt other users. They also argue that many users are using activesync service with no problem what-so-ever. However they incouraged me to keep looking for an answer.
    I couldnt find an apple guide to configuration for Exchange 2007, the enterprise deployment guide is just to vague.
    _This info comes from "About" in OWA_
    +Mailbox Owner: Juan I*** ****** [**@*****.net]+
    +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-AR; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1+
    +OWA Experience: Basic+
    +User Language: English (United States)+
    +User Timezone: (GMT-03:00) Buenos Aires, Georgetown+
    +Exchange Mailbox Address: /o=First Organization/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=*+
    +OWA Host Address: http://webmail.*****.net/owa+
    +OWA Version: 8.0.605.16+
    +Exchange Client Access Server .NET Framework Version: 2.0.50727.1433+
    +Exchange Client Access Server OS Version: Microsoft Windows NT 5.2.3790 Service Pack 2+
    +Exchange Client Access Server Version: 8.0.605.0+
    +Exchange Client Access Server Language: en-US+
    +Exchange Client Access Server Timezone: Hora estándar romance+
    +Exchange Client Access Server Flavor: 32bit+
    +Mailbox Server Name: exchange.*****.***+
    +Mailbox Server Exchange Version: 8.0.605.0+
    +Other roles currently installed on CAS server: Mailbox, Hub Transport+
    +Authentication type associated with this OWA session: Basic+
    +Public logon: Yes+
    *Does anyone have a Check-List for Microsoft Exchange 2007?*
    Please forgive my lousy English.
    Message was edited by: Nachiarg

    I don't think there will be a solution to this. Exchange 2003 just isn't supported.

  • SharePoint List Filter to narrow a folder structure

    Hello,
    The company I work for has a document library containing folders for each of their hundreds of clients.  The current process now is to load all of the folders in alphabetical order in order so that the users can scroll through and find the correct client
    relatively quickly.  This takes longer than it should considering how many folders need to load.
    I was trying to utilize the SharePoint List Filter to pull the Title column so the users could filter based on the name and we wouldn't need to pull all of the data each time the library was opened, but it seems that the title and name columns don't hold
    their connection to the list.  Each time I attempt to set the connections and then use the filter, I get the "This filter is not connected" error.
    Is it possible to use this web part in this manner (or is there another web part that will work) or should I suggest moving to meta data instead of a folder structure if they want speed of use?
    Thank you in advance!

    Hi,
    Based on your description, my understanding is that you want to you want filter the document library by the title column so that the users could filter based on the name and don’t need to pull all of the data each time the library was opened.
    Refer to the following steps:
    Open your document library-> choose Export to Excel->in excel, click insert PivotTable,
    create a pivot table in Excel -> use  Report filters
    To filter the title column->save it and upload it to a document library
    Then create a new page in SharePoint  and add the Excel Web Access web part and configure it to display your workbook, (or you can add the Excel Web Access web part in your document library and configure it to display your workbook) Now
    you can filter the document library by the title column.
    Here is a link about how to Create a pivot table in Excel 2010:
    http://www.techonthenet.com/excel/pivottbls/create2010.php
    Here is a link about how to use Report filters:
    http://www.gcflearnfree.org/excel2010/20.5
    Besides, you can refer to the following blog:
    http://consulting.risualblogs.com/blog/2014/09/10/filtering-excel-webparts-in-sharepoint-using-query-string-parameters/
    Best Regards,
    Lisa Chen

  • Library creating a new duplicate folder structure

    I am using 2.0 on a Mac. Recently I moved all my data files including photos and lightroom catalogs from an external to an internal drive on my MacPro and renamed the new drive with the same name as the external and changed the external name and it became a backup. Lightroom continued to work just fine, seeing all the images with no problem. If I do a "Show in Finder" it shows me them on the internal HD. However, when I import a new image or even import an image or folder that has previously been imported, LR brings it in within a new folder structure that uses the same hard drive name.
    My actual hard drive folder structure for my data drive is something like HardDriveName/Graphics/Airshows/image.jpg with all my images in a Graphics folder and within that a series of folders and subfolders.
    Previously if I imported a new folder, LR would show HardDriveName/NewFolder and I have several folders of imported images with that structure. It did not include the /Graphics folder because I never imported the entire Graphics folder. Now however, after importing a folder, LR created a new folder structure in the Library with a duplicate of the HardDriveName and it included /Graphics.
    I went to the first folder structure and picked a small folder and made a change to an image to darken it a great deal. Then I imported the folder all over again and it imported it to the new folder structure but the dark version was not visible. I DO have automatically write xmp data checked.
    If I right click on any image from either folder structure LR shows me the image within the same hard drive where my original are found.
    I don't want to have two folder structures and apparently if I re-import all my images LR doesn't see the xmp data. I tried to tell RM to read the xmp data from the image I had changed after it came into the new folder but it did not show up. If I manually tell LR to Save Metadata to File for a folder in my original structure and then go to the same folder in the new structure that LR is showing and tell it to read metadata it will show up in the new folder. I have a folder with 32,000+ images and thousands of other images.
    I would like LR to continue to bring images into my "old" folder structure but that may not be possible. Any help?
    Interestingly I have more than one data drive. This problem does not seem to be happening with my other data drive that I also swapped to an internal configuration.
    I put a pic of my folder structure at http://www.pbase.com/santa/image/101246417 to illustrate the issue. My harddrive name shows as Brandon.
    I spoke too soon. LR seems to be creating a new folder structure for two of my three hard drives and adding images properly to one of my three hard drives. All three were new drives with the names changed to match the old drives.

    yes I did update camera raw. I think LR 2.0 asked for that. I did a search on "duplicate" and found no answer to my problem. Anyone with a link to any useful information?

  • Is there an app for creating a folder structure on the iPhone out there?

    I'm looking for an application to create folders (possibly password-protect them) on the iPhone, so I can add documents, PDFs, video clips etc to the phone and create subdivide them further in folders. There doesn't seem to be anything that does the right job in the app store. Is it not possible? Any feedback to help me understand would be appreciated.

    It is not possible. You cannot create the folder structure you're speaking of and you cannot save files to your iPhone, even if you had folders.
    There are no apps for folders or app organization. There are apps that allow you to access files from your desktop or the cloud from your iPhone. I use box.net. Dropbox and AirShare are others.

  • How to change location of files (folder structure to storing in iPhoto lib)

    I need help.
    I thought I was smart, but as is always the case, I find out that I am not
    I did not trust iPhoto at first. So I retained my images in my 8 years of folder structure (by year and then subfolders of months).
    My lib is getting large, 7000 plus images, and when importing images (I do not have the setting for imported images to be stored to iPhoto Lib) and wanting to delete some, I find it more work than is necessary.
    Bottom line: Can someone tell me if there is a way to change the setting (of course there is) but also to reimport, or move, my images that are already in iPhoto (but are really just previews referencing to my folder structure) so that they will reside in the iPhoto Lib?
    When I import it finds duplicates...if I say do not import then it does not go any further...but if I say "yes, import duplicates" then it brings them in as duplicates...which means I have two copies, but only one retains all of the keywords etc.
    Another bottom line: I want to retain my keywords in my current library, but move all images into the iPhoto lib instead of my folder structure. I can do this from this date forward, but I want to get the entire lib to be this way.
    Help?

    read through this thread - it should help you
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1125431&tstart=45
    Larry Nebel

  • Automatic creation of KM folder structure from xml pattern

    Hi all,
    is it possible to create a KM folder structure automaticly, following the tree structure of an xml document?
    For example:
    an xml-document with following content:
    <item id=1 level=0>abc</item>
    <item id=2 level=1>aaa</item>
    <item id=3 level=1>bbb</item>
    <item id=4 level=2>ccc</item>
    <item id=5 level=0>def</item>
    I'd like to create a KM folder structure like this:
    - abc
    ---aaa
    ---bbb
    ccc
    - def
    Does anyone have any idea to implement this scenario in KM?
    Much obliged!
    Steffi

    Not currently - well at least not easily - there is always the programatic approach.
    I would suggest you can create an FSDB repository - this means you can then create your structure in the file system using standard desktop tools.
    After that you could do a mass copy back into the db based KM repository if you so wished.
    For your downstream systems you could always ICE the data across meaning you dont have to create everything again.
    Haydn

  • SAP Netweaver Portal - Folder structure and report publishing strategy

    Hi gurus,
    I'm working on a project in which we are publishing BW reports in SAP Netweaver Portal (prior to this, we were using SAP Bex Browser) organizing it by Department (workset, 2nd lvl of navigation), Business Processes (workset, 3rd lvl of navigation) and "iview types" (transactions, queries, dashboards and so on). On 1st level we have a workset simply called "Reports".
    For each PFCG role we have on BW (ABAP Server), we created a portal role and defined which of the higher navigation tiers is visible to users (delta-linking the top level navigation worksets to the portal role and setting visible accordingly) and then we assigned Portal roles to the appropriated Group (PFCG role) so all users that have access to certain PFCG role can have access to the corresponding Portal role.
    For example:
    In BW (ABAP) we have a PFCG Role: Sales PMR Analysis - Administrator, which grants access to Sales Infoproviders, queries and data for PMR analysis. The user that have access to it, should be able to see:
    |Reports|
    |Sales Administration|
    v PMR Analysis
      > Web Queries
      > Transactions
      > Dashboards
      > Workbooks
    In Portal we create a workset that has: "Reports" and under it, all Departments (Sales Administration, Financial, Services, Human Resources and so on) set as "not visible". We create a Portal role called PMR Analysis and add the Report/Departments workset, set Sales Administration as visible and add worksets/folders named PMR Analysis, Web queries, Transactions, etc, and all the corresponding iviews under it.
    If we assign this new Portal role to the Group of the corresponding PFCG role, the user will see exactly as the example from above.
    Pros: The users have a clean view of the reports he/she has access.
    Cons: The users doesn't have a clear view of what is available in BW so he can request access. There might be some useful report lost in on of the hundreds of BW roles that he doesn't know it exist.
    One of the options would be to grant visibility to ALL departments, business processes and iviews in Portal and let PFCG security roles control user access, but that might be confusing to have an overwhelming amount of links, making it hard to find what the user needs, specially during first access. Not to mention possible security breaches.
    So, I'd like to know how other consultants are defining this kind of folder structure and report publishing strategy in Portal. Ideally we would like to be able to have:
    - Visibility of all existant reports even those that the user does not have acess (so he can learn that it exist and request access)
    - Clean view of reports, segmented by department and business processes.
    - Possibility to search for reports, even for those that the user does not have access.
    I'd appreciate if you guys can share your experience on this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Leandro

    Cons: The users doesn't have a clear view of what is available in BW so he can request access. There might be some useful report lost in on of the hundreds of BW roles that he doesn't know it exist
    This is not a refutation: your BW developers/consultants should be able to write reports, which points you in case of insufficent backend rights. EP is not designed to be familiar with ABAP security concept and cant take any influence at it.
    One of the options would be to grant visibility to ALL departments, business processes and iviews in Portal and let PFCG security roles control user access, but that might be confusing to have an overwhelming amount of links, making it hard to find what the user needs, specially during first access. Not to mention possible security breaches.
    Yes, bad idea.
    - Visibility of all existant reports even those that the user does not have acess (so he can learn that it exist and request access)
    As you already wrote on your own, this would be not good
    - Clean view of reports, segmented by department and business processes.
    - Possibility to search for reports, even for those that the user does not have access.
    This is not covered by SAP, if you wanna provide that, develop it on your own.
    cheers

  • I moved all my photos to my external drive. I then deleted my iphoto library and re-imported them from the external. Once iphoto created it's folder structure on my external, I deleted mine. Now my computer just "beach balls" all day when I turn it on.

    i have a 2006 iMac with a 160 HD and 1GB of ram. I recently got a 2TB external hard drive and transfered all my pictures to that. Once I had a solid folder structure for my photos, I dragged them all to iPhoto. Once iPhoto had created its own folder structure of my photos, I deleted my own folder structure, so that I wouldn't have multiple copies. It all sounded like a great plan, but now my computer just "beach balls" every time I turn it on.

    What does this have to do with iPhoto? If you're computer isn't starting up properly I'd be posting on the OS forum for whatever version of the OS you have.
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for