Font rendering in GTK

I am having sporadic font issues with GTK applications. Example:
http://i.imgur.com/wJa2839.jpg
There is no identifyable trigger, but it appears to be universal (e.g. pidgin is currently displaying the same types of black boxes). Additionally, in GTK lists, some items disappear (e.g. some of my folder names in Sylpheed go missing) until I move the cursor and trigger some sort of tooltip.
I'm running the Enlightenment desktop from the official packages and no other obvious potential patches / apps that I can investigate.
21:14:50(Fri!) an ~> locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=
-- mod edit: converted oversized image to url. Trilby --
Last edited by Trilby (2014-11-01 02:14:20)

Hello, a few weeks ago I installed kde and when I open firefox- only occurs in firefox ( no google-chrome)- this happens to me  in some characters::
At first I thought it was a matter of rendering fonts, I have installed infinality-bundle, I made a comment in the thread bohoomil:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=162098&p=57
..... this told me that he believed that this is issue drivers not rendering fonts ... I do not know exactly why this problem occurs , it may be a problem of firefox with drivers "mesa" (Open Source Drivers) .
My graphic card and drivers card is:
[hector@archkde ~]$ inxi -Gx
Graphics: Card: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] Bonaire XTX [Radeon R7 260X]
bus-ID: 01:00.0
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.1 drivers: ati,radeon Resolution: [email protected]
GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on AMD BONAIRE
GLX Version: 3.0 Mesa 10.3.2 Direct Rendering: Yes
I try dissabiling "Hardware Aceleration" in Firefox and customize the values to graphic card (20-radeon.conf).. but unfortunately this did not work ...
Note: I think most cases occurs :
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=189180
Best Regards.
Last edited by colegui (2014-11-01 06:27:48)

Similar Messages

  • [NEARLY SOLVED] font rendering in gtk apps problem after last upgrade

    Im' using KDE, cairo-lcd, libxft-lcd... my fonts looked beautifully, but now they look horrible...
    After last upgrade my gtk apps (firefox, thunderbird) render fonts in an ugly way...
    I've tried to revert to pango 1.16.5 with no lucky result (the same problem)...
    here is the log:
    [2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded bind (9.4.1_P1-2 -> 9.4.1_P1-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded glib2 (2.14.0-2 -> 2.14.0-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded gnupg2 (2.0.5-1 -> 2.0.6-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded gtk2 (2.10.14-2 -> 2.10.14-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded kernel26ck (2.6.22.2.ck1-1 -> 2.6.22.3.ck1-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libdownload (1.1-1 -> 1.1-2)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libevent (1.3b-1 -> 1.3d-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libxtst (1.0.2-1 -> 1.0.3-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded nvidia-ck (100.14.11-2 -> 100.14.11-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded sip (4.6-1 -> 4.7-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded pyqt (3.17.2-1 -> 3.17.3-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xf86-input-joystick (1.2.2-1 -> 1.2.3-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-server-utils (1.0.4-1 -> 1.0.4-2)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-utils (1.0.2-2 -> 1.0.2-4)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-xdm (1.1.5-1 -> 1.1.6-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xterm (225-1 -> 229-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded cpio (2.8-1 -> 2.9-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded ed (0.5-3 -> 0.8-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded initscripts (2007.08-1 -> 2007.08-2)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded intltool (0.36.0-1 -> 0.36.1-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded libarchive (2.2.5-1 -> 2.2.6-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded man-pages (2.60-1 -> 2.64-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded pciutils (2.2.4-2 -> 2.2.6-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded readline (5.2-2 -> 5.2-3)
    [2007-08-22 00:16] upgraded gdbm (1.8.3-3 -> 1.8.3-4)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.3-1 -> 2.6.22.4-2)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded lcms (1.16-1 -> 1.17-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded libice (1.0.2-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded libxrender (0.9.2-1 -> 0.9.3-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded procinfo (18-3 -> 19-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded xorg-apps (1.0.2-4 -> 1.0.3-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.4-2 -> 2.6.22.4-2.1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded librsvg (2.18.0-1 -> 2.18.1-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded libxpm (3.5.6-1 -> 3.5.7-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded libxaw (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded makedev (3.8.3-1 -> 3.23-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded mcpp (2.6-1 -> 2.6.4-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded naim (0.11.8.2.1-1 -> 0.11.8.3.1-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded nfs-utils (1.0.12-2 -> 1.0.12-3)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded pam (0.81-4 -> 0.99.8.1-3.1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded pango (1.16.5-1 -> 1.18.0-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded sox (13.0.0-1 -> 13.0.0-2)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded xorg-apps (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.3-2)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded xtrans (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded glibc (2.6.1-1 -> 2.6.1-2)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded bftpd (1.9-1 -> 2.0-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded gcc (4.2.1-3 -> 4.2.1-3.1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded gtk-doc (1.8-2 -> 1.8-3)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded hal-info (0.20070618-1 -> 0.20070725-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded perl-xml-simple (2.16-2 -> 2.18-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded icon-naming-utils (0.8.2-2 -> 0.8.5-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:26] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.4-2.1 -> 2.6.22.5-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:27] upgraded kernel26ck (2.6.22.3.ck1-1 -> 2.6.22.5.ck1-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:27] upgraded libgnomeprint (2.18.0-1 -> 2.18.1-1)
    [2007-08-25 22:41] removed libgnomeprintui (2.18.0-1)
    [2007-08-25 22:41] removed libgnomeprint (2.18.1-1)
    i dunno what happened...
    plz, someone help me
    regards
    Last edited by saneone (2007-08-30 18:11:32)

    Bogart wrote:
    I think the spacing now is correct, while before it was wrong. The only "problem" is that you got used to a bad font rendering, and now that it has changed for better you feel like it's different and don't like it.
    Really, *most* of the problems that people find in Linux's fonts are just because they are used to the awful default fonts from Windows XP. Yes, people can even get used to those fonts and believe they're good!!! And when they see correct fonts in Linux they think they're bad...
    What I would do is remove the MS TTF fonts. They work bad in Windows and worse in Linux. You should use Bitstream Vera or DejaVu if you want good quality fonts (especially in web pages).
    But, then again, you might think that they look wrong just because you're not used to it... Oh, well...
    What does correct font / correct spacing mean ?
    IMO, that doesn't make any sense, because that's a totally subjective matter, like many other things in this world.
    BTW, I love how fonts look in Windows, and I think that must be the only thing MS got right. Thus, I'm using ms fonts in linux, and a rendering as close as possible (no autohinting or antialiasing or subpixel rendering).
    Similarly, I could find a woman beautiful that you would find ugly or just average. We are all different, and it's better that way

  • Font rendering in certain GTK+ 3 applications

    In some GTK+ 3 applications, fonts appear to have a slightly reddish fuzz and seem a bit unclear; this does not differ by font, so I'm assuming it's a font rendering issue. Is there any known solution to this? I searched around a bit and couldn't find anything.

    Pse wrote:Hmm, looks like the wrong LCD filter is getting picked. What desktop environment are you on? I take it it is not Gnome, is it?
    It's just the default one; I'm using GNOME 3.10.
    genghizkhan91 wrote:Are you using the infinality packages?
    No; just plain fontconfig/freetype2.
    Regular font rendering settings are being used (fully antialiased, slight hinting, rgba, default lcd filter, etc.)
    Edit: Also, note that this issue had been present in several other applications but disappeared recently after certain upgrades; for instance, fonts were similarly fuzzy in the "About" section of most GTK+ 3 applications and the "Notifications" section of GNOME Control Center.
    Last edited by rainbowdashc (2014-03-30 14:16:07)

  • Font rendering differences between Xfce and KDE

    Hi,
    I am using both KDE and Xfce (mostly Xfce with KDE apps) and I observed that there is a font rendering difference between Gtk (Xfce) and QT (KDE) apps.
    In both desktop environments I use dejavu sans font, size 9 and I have set RGB subpixel rendering and hinting to full.
    I created some screenshots of dolphin and thunar to illustrate the differences (right click and select view image to see the screenshots in full resolution)
    Can somebody help me to make gtk app fonts to look the same as qt ones? Or at least tell me why there is this difference.
    Thank you.

    I cant tell you why there is a difference, but this page may help you. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_Configuration
    I ended up installing the Ubuntu patched packages in the AUR, but there are different options.

  • Font rendering in KDE 4

    I recently installed Arch (switching from Ubuntu 8.10) and decided to give KDE a try.  So far I'm mostly happy, but the font rendering isn't working so well.  There are two problems: the first is that fonts all look too thin.  The second is that most of them are way too big!  (For some reason they render properly in some places, like some sites online [e.g. Gmail], but they're way off in most applications.)
    I've tried the suggestions under "LCD" packages from the Arch fonts wiki, along with this guy's suggestions for setting up fontconfig.  I've also tried (variously) changing my DPI settings for KDM and System Settings -> Appearance -> Fonts (with aliasing anti-aliasing enabled or with system settings, and forcing the DPI to 120 or disabled).
    Oh, and I have a 15.4" widescreen 1680x1050 LCD monitor, which I think is (supposed to be) 129 DPI.
    What can I do to get fonts to look the way they should?

    hunterthomson wrote:
    OK, you problem is not with KDE. This weirded me out when I moved to Archlinux from Ubuntu too. In Archlinux you have to install all the fonts you want to use. The default fonts suck. So, You just need to install better fonts. You want the TrueType Fonts "ttf". You can install them with    pacman
    Try this to list all the font packages available.
    sudo pacman -Ss font
    These are some ones that are good
    ttf-dejavu
    ttf-freefont
    ttf-liberation
    you instal them you just do...
    sudo pacman -S ttf-liberation ttf-freefont ttf-dejavu
    Then you will want to open up the Konfiguration thing that you change the KDE configurations settings in and then change the fonts in there.
    Thanks for the tip!  I installed those (and a few others), and I definitely like (for instance) FreeSans better than the default Sans that most everything was using.  Most things look better; I think I'm going to have to tweak the hinting a bit still, but this is definitely an improvement.  Many of the things I thought were rendering related were actually just bad fonts, like you said.
    There are just a couple of problems remaining that I'm hoping will be just as easy to conquer...  First, some websites are still rendering horribly.  Take a look at this screenshot of this site, followed by this one:
    At first I figured it was a problem with Firefox (I know GTK doesn't always play nicely with KDE), but it looks the same in Konqueror.  A quick peek at the HTML for the first seems to say that it's asking for Verdana, Arial, or Helvetica...and I have Verdana and Arial installed.  (The second one calls for a ridiculous font, Palatino Linotype, which I don't have.)  Either way, though, the pages look totally wrong (the font is much too large) compared to any other machine I've seen it on (even my previous Ubuntu setup).   Does anyone know what's going on?
    One other example of font size weirdness: the digital clock plasmoid.  Here's what it looks like:
    The odd thing is that it looked like this for a while when I first installed Arch and KDE, and then played nicely for a few days...and now it's back to looking ugly.
    And finally, here are my font settings in System Settings:
    (And yes, I've rebooted since installing the new fonts and changing font settings, just in case.)
    Any more ideas?

  • Font corruption in GTK apps only

    For a day or so now I have been seeing quite bad font corruption in GTK apps -- gtk-demo and Chromium both have this problem. QT apps are not affected. Forcing a font cache rebuild with `sudo fc-cache -rf` did not help the situation, and neither did reinstalling the affected fonts.
    I did not upgrade or install any packages between the font rendering being fine, and it being corrupted (see the screenshot).
    Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/pF39tvm.png
    Any ideas?
    Last edited by cdown (2014-03-15 00:39:40)

    I've seen corruption like this with a lot of cairo apps because the text to be rendered is sent to a buggy EXA driver. Does text look better if you turn off EXA acceleration?

  • Font rendering and legacy X applications

    For some time, I have had problems keeping older applications working well as the X font system evolves. For example, I have many drawings created in Xfig, and the fonts stopped being rendered correctly some time ago. Converting all these files for a new drawing package like Inkscape would be a pain. The other main problem occurs with a commercial CAD package (Eagle), which is statically linked to Qt2, and does not play nicely when anti-aliasing is applied to Qt3/KDE apps.
    Xfig and others
    The problem here is that Xfig would render fonts with the letters too closely spaced, such that the on-screen representation no longer matches the printed or PDF output. I fixed this by forcing 75 x 75 DPI resolution, rather than using the resolution determined by the X server from probing the monitor. To do this, put a line in the Monitor section of XF86Config or xorg.conf:
        DisplaySize 433 347
    The above x and y values were calculated for a resolution of 1280 x 1024.
    Another fix I have done for Xfig is to patch the sources to pick up the URW font names instead of the Adobe names for the standard Postscript fonts. If anyone is interested, I could make a proper Arch package for this.
    Forcing the resolution is admittedly a kludge. I might look into font rendering in an Xlib application, to see if there is some extra code needed to handle the proper resolution correctly.
    Gtk-2.0 UI fonts at 75DPI
    An unfortunate side effect of forcing 75 x 75 DPI resolution is that the menu and other UI fonts in Gtk apps end up too small. This was noticed on Gvim and Gnumeric. KDE and Qt programmes appear to be unaffected. This can be fixed by creating a .gtkrc-2.0 file in your home directory with the following contents:
        gtk-font-name = "Bitstream Vera Sans 12"
    Put whatever font and size you like. I have no information on the format of the gtkrc file. The above was adapted from a page found on Google.
    Mozilla (which uses Gtk) needs some individual tweaking, as the UI fonts end up far too big. In preferences->fonts, set the resoultion to 72 DPI.
    The above measures should only be required if you have forced 75DPI. I had no problems with Gtk apps prior to doing that.
    Eagle
    The problem with Eagle appears to be related to the fact that it uses Qt2 (statically linked) in a Qt3 environment. This might also occur with other apps, but Eagle is the only one I know about. When antialising is turned on via KDE control center, this modifies .qt/qtrc, and so affects all Qt applications. If I have anti-aliasing turned on, the fonts in Eagle are very ragged and badly spaced.
    I fixed this by modifying the font path in XF86Config, to remove the entry /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF. The problem appears to be that Eagle is picking up one of the True Type fonts, instead of a Type 1 or bitmapped font. Turning on antialing in Qt appears to alter its font selection behaviour (fontconfig?) as well as font rendering.
    An interesting outcome of experimenting with the font path is that removing entries only affects older applications. KDE and other modern apps work perfectly well with only the mandatory /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc entry present. As far as I know, this is because modern toolkits like Qt3 and Gtk2 use fontconfig to find fonts.

    I now made two screenshots of Mail: The first one while the external display was disconnected, the second one when it was connected (and Mail moved to the external display). I opened both screenshots in Photoshop and there was a clear difference between the font renderings: On the screenshot of the internal display, the fonts are smoothed with black and grey pixels only, while on the screenshot from the external display they are smoothed with colored pixels. This is the reason why the text looks so bad on the external one. Therefore, it is definitely a problem of the font rendering. In Photoshop, the difference of font rendering is clearly visible!
    See here:
    http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5389/fontt.jpg
    The first line is internal display, the second line external display. That's unbelievable.
    Another thing: I found out that it's not only Mail that has the problem - it is any application that was started after the external display had been connected. It seems that OS X applies the font rendering setting at the moment a application is starts. When I disconnect the display, start Finder, Mail, Safari and so on, and then connect the display, then all the applications look great even on the external display. When I quit the apps and then restart, the font rendering is broken again

  • [SOLVED] Font rendering messed up after latest freetype2 upgrade.

    I haven't touched my font configuration, but the appearance of most fonts has changed across the board (i.e. in every application) since I upgraded to freetype 2.4.6 yesterday. In particular, the fonts are less strong, and in LibreOffice Calc in particular the spacing is messed up at certain levels of magnification despite having hinting enabled. Here is my ~/.gtkrc-2.0:
    gtk-icon-theme-name = "nuoveXT2"
    gtk-theme-name = "Clearlooks"
    gtk-font-name = "FreeSans 10"
    gtk-xft-antialias = 1
    gtk-xft-hinting = 1
    gtk-xft-hintstyle = "hintfull"
    gtk-xft-rgba = "rgb"
    I have tried many combinations of AA and hinting, and nothing seems to work. Fonts do look slightly differently when I change the hinting settings (except in Calc), but they do not look as crisp as before the upgrade. Can anyone help me?
    Last edited by nbtrap (2011-08-01 01:44:13)

    It figures that I fix this right after giving up and posting to the forums. It seems that either (1) Xresources overrides gtk settings or (2) Libreoffice ignores gtk settings. I had not had any ~/.Xresources file, but after creating one:
    Xft.dpi: 96
    Xft.antialias: true
    Xft.rgba: rgb
    Xft.hinting: true
    Xft.hintstyle: hintslight
    and adding
    xrdb -merge ~/.Xresources
    to ~/.xinitrc,, the font rendering has returned to normal across all applications, The strange thing is that I didn't have an Xresources config file before when the rendering was working fine. It's also weird that fonts in GTK apps looks crisper with Xresources configured than they do with the same configuration in ~/.gtkrc-2.0. I can't figure out why, but at least it's now working.

  • [SOLVED] Bad font rendering after last update (pango issue?)

    I am getting very strange font rendering problem. Look at the screen below. It only affects gtk windows (as you can see below HTML text is currently displayed, but url bar and context menu is not). I belive it appeared after upgrading pango package to 1.32, but downgrading it as instructed here (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151886), didn't help. Does anybody know what can it be? Any hints where to look for the solution?
    Maciej
    Last edited by mamciek (2012-11-20 22:01:45)

    brebs wrote:https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32612?project=1
    That seems to be an issue. Downgrading to  xorg-server 1.13.0-3 resolved problem. Watching ticket for future updates. Thanks a lot
    Last edited by mamciek (2012-11-20 22:02:58)

  • Font Rendering Got Bad After 32.0 Update

    After the recent update, the font started to get badly rendered. Kind of blurry with jagged edges and transparent parts. It used to be okay D:
    Sometimes it becomes okay for a moment as I scroll down on pages, and sometimes when I stop scrolling, the font stays as it is; as if there are specific positions for the text to render properly. However, not all of the fonts are affected. Only the ones inside the scroll area.
    On times that the font renders properly, the bookmarks font, title bar, and tab names are unaffected and still appear not-smooth. Same thing does not happen on other browsers. All my other system fonts look okay; it's really just Firefox.
    Restarting Firefox = didn't work
    Restarting Computer = didn't work
    Tried setting up Clear Type = didn't work
    Tried enabling and disabling Hardware Acceleration on Firefox = didn't work
    Tried enabling and disabling the Graphics card itself = didn't work
    Tried just about all of the suggestions I found on Google = none worked
    Tried complete uninstall and re-install of Firefox 32.0 = didn't work
    Graphics Driver are updated ~
    Windows is updated ~
    I'm using Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit
    Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6800
    I fixed it by downgrading to Firefox 31 which makes me sure that 32.0 is the culprit. As I was about to send the message on top; I tried downgrading as my last resort and it worked. Now I'm only sending this as a report. I am hoping you'll figure out what caused it because I am quite strict (OC) that everything in my PC must remain updated >_<; thus I want to use Firefox 32.0 as much as possible.

    No one to help on this ??????

  • Flex 4.5/FP10.2 web app: Font rendering problem

    Heya,
    Upped a web app from Flex 4.0/4.1 to Flex 4.5 & fonts started to render really badly (blurry & 'stronger').
    They are embedded as CFF, no errors or warnings gives. Also upgraded to Flash Player 10.2, which apparently has 'enhanched' font rendering.
    Haven't set applicationDPI on the s:Application tag, so DPI management should be disabled according to the docs.
    (See http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/mobileapps/WS19f279b149e7481c682e5a9412cf5976c17-8000.htm l)
    It's straight up @font-face embeds in a CSS file, nothing odd or wrong there.
    Is the case that this is how it's supposed to look now? In that case, how do I revert back to sane rendering?
    Do I need to configure 4.5 somehow to get it to do fonts right?

    Also tested Franklin Gothic, same deal. Tested on Mac (10.2) & PC (10.2 & 10.3). Flex 4.5 for both platforms.
    fonts.css:
    @font-face
    src: url("fonts/arial.ttf");
    font-family: Arial;
    font-weight: normal;
    embedAsCFF: true;
    FontTest.mxml:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
       xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
       xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="955" minHeight="600">
    <fx:Style source="fonts.css"/>
    <s:Label x="20" y="20"
    fontFamily="Arial"
    fontLookup="embeddedCFF"
    fontSize="12"
    cffHinting="horizontalStem"
    text="TESTAR Testar testar" />
    </s:Application>

  • Font rendering quality in Illustrator is terrible!

    What the heck rode Adobe when they implemented the new font engine?
    Why, oh why is Apple's font rendering so much better? And why wouldn't Adobe use something that's already readily available on the mac platform?
    I have a huge problem mocking up website layouts in Illustrator. Type looks much better in Firefox or Safari. How come, huh?

    I believe this is the result of sub-pixel antialiasing (SPAA), which optimizes text appearance on laptops. Illustrator's rasterizing doesn't SPAA, which is fine for most CRTs, print, and LCD displays that might be rotated.
    It's more a case of the OS being savvy enough to tell what kind of display you have and antialias appropriately. Illustrator's rendering engine does need to support SPAA.

  • Font rendering OS X issues

    Hi people,
    I baught a MacBook Air and I am new to OS X. I have this machine since 1 month and I simply cannot get used to the font rendering of OS X. I thought I get used to it after a while, but I don't. I feel like I have body lotion in my eyes all the time, fonts are really blurry and I can only work on that machine for some time. On my windows machine I worked all day long, with no such problems, but not in OS X. It is set to native resolution and I already set the font smoothing to 1, but this is still not enough, while turning font smoothing completely off makes everything look very ugly.
    I wonder why no one ever mentioned that in reviews, etc.? Does it not bother mac users? However, is there some other option (besides scaling down to lower resolution)? I have headache almost every evening, so this is really a problem to me.
    Thanks in advance.

    Do any other applications behave like that? Or just these two?

  • Crisp / Clear Font Rendering?

    Is there any suggestion on Arch Linux running Gnome 2.6.30 to improve the crisp / clearness of my fonts? I installed the latest available nVidia drivers & under 'Appearance' > 'Fonts' > 'Details', I show the following:
    * Resolution: 98 dots per square inch.
    * Smoothing: Subpixel (LCD)
    * Hinting: Slight
    * Subpixel Order: RGB
    It just never seems as clear and crisp when I compare side by side to Ubuntu or Windows 7. The font clarity is notable difference beween Arch and I would like to change this. Any help and or tips would be greatly appreciated!
    Screenshot
    -Carlos
    Last edited by Carlwill (2010-04-28 13:25:23)

    Ubuntu uses special patches for their font rendering: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fon … d_packages
    Windows uses Cleartype: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fon … e_packages

  • Weird Font Rendering Issue?

    Okay i was looking fo some back up drives online, and i stumbled upon:
    http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Seagate-Barracuda-7200-9-500GB-Internal-Drive-ST3 500641ARK/sem/rpsm/oid/168899/catOid/-12976/rpem/ccd/productDetail.do
    it renders like this:
    http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/4641/picture3rn0.png
    http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture4dr1.png
    but for some reason on my MacPro 2.66 the font renders odd in FireFox (doenst do it on Safari. and ive tried this exact sit eon my MacBookPro and it looks fine on Firefox.
    I have the following installed (on both machines)
    -FireFox 2.0.0.9
    -Microsoft Office 2004
    -Adobe CS2
    -Macromedia Studio 8
    theyre practically identical with programs & fonts installed, the only fonts that are installe are the ones that wer epreinstalled with the system, and that came with Office 04 and CS2
    any way to maybe fix this issue?

    hey! well i tried your site url on my MacPro and i have the same issue, so it must be a macpro thing? lol
    im running the latest firefox and no additional fonts installed other than the ones you have listed yourself (office, cs2, macromedia)
    so dont fret. i tried using font finangler and onyx to clean the font cache, (not sure i fhtat was a good idea,) but it shows up on mine so your not the only one! ive tried on two different macpros one wiht out any programs and it does the same thing. so it must be something with the wya its rendering on these machines.
    at first it hought maybe something got corrupted in my system aswell
    hope that helps!!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ideal adc

    Hi all,     I'm trying to find some ideal ADC to run the simulation.  I want to add jitter to the sample signal. However, the analog to digital.vi cannot use sample signal.  It's helpful to tell me what should I do. Best Regards, Laffer

  • Adjusting Details on a Purchase Order.

    Folks i'm looking to make a change on our actual Purchase Order,i.e.Change the name on the Invoice Address. How does one go about doing this? Is it done in SE71?

  • Could Not Plan MRP Process Planning.

    Hi, all members of the forum. I Have a problem with MRP process from OPM Process Planning, Because it don´t make suggestion plan. I have already OPM Process Planning setup, I don´t have sales orders just forecast and associate it with the correct sch

  • Link to Google Earth

    How can I can have a button in iWeb which when clicked takes me to a specific location of google earth (either within my site or a separate window)? Thanks

  • How to take away html codes

    Hi Everyone, i am now currently doing a project and my part is to do fourm, i just want to ask abt this problem: If i post a new topic and i enter in html codes that will be very dangerous. So is there anyway to remove the htm codes when i post the n