Font rendering or scaling issue in Illustrator - irregular letter heights

I get a strange kind of scaling problem for some fonts in Illustrator as well as Photoshop.
For example here is Helvetica Neue Light at 18px. You can see that the letters 'r' and 'v' are the wrong height:
At font sizes above 18px I don't get a problem.
In non-Adobe programs (e.g. Textedit) the font renders OK at all font sizes.
Any ideas?

Yep this is an incredibly annoying Adobe problem - and definitely not just with Helvetica. It's a lot of fonts at a lot of sizes - especially smaller sizes. It also happens with acrobat reader, whereas if you use apple preview the fonts render fine. Totally odd and disappointing.
A somewhat decent workaround I've found is to add a rasterize live effect to the text. This can also help with small text on curved paths  - at angles - and also when you resize/rotate/modify an imported image to prevent it from looking like crap. Why it isn't just done automatically I don't know - but I'm happy to have discovered a temp work around at least.
Hope that helps!
//jayse

Similar Messages

  • Font rendering OS X issues

    Hi people,
    I baught a MacBook Air and I am new to OS X. I have this machine since 1 month and I simply cannot get used to the font rendering of OS X. I thought I get used to it after a while, but I don't. I feel like I have body lotion in my eyes all the time, fonts are really blurry and I can only work on that machine for some time. On my windows machine I worked all day long, with no such problems, but not in OS X. It is set to native resolution and I already set the font smoothing to 1, but this is still not enough, while turning font smoothing completely off makes everything look very ugly.
    I wonder why no one ever mentioned that in reviews, etc.? Does it not bother mac users? However, is there some other option (besides scaling down to lower resolution)? I have headache almost every evening, so this is really a problem to me.
    Thanks in advance.

    Do any other applications behave like that? Or just these two?

  • Font rendering quality in Illustrator is terrible!

    What the heck rode Adobe when they implemented the new font engine?
    Why, oh why is Apple's font rendering so much better? And why wouldn't Adobe use something that's already readily available on the mac platform?
    I have a huge problem mocking up website layouts in Illustrator. Type looks much better in Firefox or Safari. How come, huh?

    I believe this is the result of sub-pixel antialiasing (SPAA), which optimizes text appearance on laptops. Illustrator's rasterizing doesn't SPAA, which is fine for most CRTs, print, and LCD displays that might be rotated.
    It's more a case of the OS being savvy enough to tell what kind of display you have and antialias appropriately. Illustrator's rendering engine does need to support SPAA.

  • Weird Font Rendering Issue?

    Okay i was looking fo some back up drives online, and i stumbled upon:
    http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Seagate-Barracuda-7200-9-500GB-Internal-Drive-ST3 500641ARK/sem/rpsm/oid/168899/catOid/-12976/rpem/ccd/productDetail.do
    it renders like this:
    http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/4641/picture3rn0.png
    http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture4dr1.png
    but for some reason on my MacPro 2.66 the font renders odd in FireFox (doenst do it on Safari. and ive tried this exact sit eon my MacBookPro and it looks fine on Firefox.
    I have the following installed (on both machines)
    -FireFox 2.0.0.9
    -Microsoft Office 2004
    -Adobe CS2
    -Macromedia Studio 8
    theyre practically identical with programs & fonts installed, the only fonts that are installe are the ones that wer epreinstalled with the system, and that came with Office 04 and CS2
    any way to maybe fix this issue?

    hey! well i tried your site url on my MacPro and i have the same issue, so it must be a macpro thing? lol
    im running the latest firefox and no additional fonts installed other than the ones you have listed yourself (office, cs2, macromedia)
    so dont fret. i tried using font finangler and onyx to clean the font cache, (not sure i fhtat was a good idea,) but it shows up on mine so your not the only one! ive tried on two different macpros one wiht out any programs and it does the same thing. so it must be something with the wya its rendering on these machines.
    at first it hought maybe something got corrupted in my system aswell
    hope that helps!!

  • Font Rendering Issues-Help Required Please

    In the past week, any Google search on Firefox or Chrome (but not Opera) gives me results where the fonts look gappy. Sometimes there are additional dots above the letters. I uninstalled and reinstalled Firefox from scratch in case an add-on was at fault but even with a clean install I am still seeing the issue. I checked my font settings and do not have any minimum font size set. I have allow pages to choose their own font ticked.
    I've uploaded an image where I can see some correctly rendered text and some gappy looking text (not from a Google search but a Mozilla query). It also happens when commenting online sometimes, during typing it will be gappy but it will show properly once submitted. Any ideas for a fix would be warmly welcomed and I can give more examples if that would help. Although it's not Firefox related, I did restore all defaults in Chrome and it didn't fix the issue there either.
    I uninstalled the most recent Windows Update since the problem is recent but it didn't change anything. I'm not sure if browsers would even look to my computers fonts.

    hi Auds77, this is probably caused by microsoft update kb3013455 which can cause font rendering issues on vista:
    <blockquote>After you install security update 3013455, you may notice some text quality degradation in certain scenarios. The problem only occurs on systems that are running Windows Vista SP2 or Windows Server 2003 SP2. Microsoft is researching this problem and will post more information in this article when the information becomes available. </blockquote>
    <sup>reference: https://support.microsoft.com/kb/3013455</sup>
    one option may be to [http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/remove-update#1TC=windows-vista roll-back this particular update] for now until there is a fix by microsoft or you could also look if there is a [[Upgrade your graphics drivers to use hardware acceleration and WebGL|graphics driver update]] available on the website of the vendor (intel/amd/nvidia) which might also resolve this problem in some cases.

  • Font rendering issue & multimedia keys not working

    Hi, yesterday i switched to KDEmod 4.1 and I have two major problems...
    One is font rendering issue... I did not change anything in my font-related packages (cairo, freetype, fontconfig, libxft) and i have to add that this setup worked perfectly in KDEmod 3.5.9, but now it looks like this:
    This bug occurs only in qt apps and mostly in kmenu... i.e firefox renders my fonts flawlessly...
    Second problem are multimedia keys on my keyboard...
    They worked in KDE 3.5.9, but now I cannot set them up properly... Sometimes they work, sometimes they don't...
    KDE recognizes the pressed key, but when I assign specific action and press the key, just nothing happens...

    You might be able to solve your font issue by going to System Settings -> Appearance -> Fonts.  I enable ant-aliasing.  I also clicked on configure and select "Use sub-pixel rendering" to RGB and the hinting style to Full.  I also use the Force fonts DPI to 96 DPI.  This makes the fonts pleasing to my eyes.
    This is how I got my multimedia keys to work in KDE4.1:
    Go to System Settings -> Regional and Language and make sure to set the County or region to your location.
    khotkeys needs to be running.  I added it to the autostarted progam list. System Settings -> Advanced tab -> Autostart
    When I got the multimedia keys working, I was really tring to get the keyboard shortcuts to work.  In addition to the above steps, I also deleted
    ~/.kde4/share/config/kglobalshortcutsrc.  I do not know if deleting this file is needed to get the multimedia keys working, but it was to get the keyboard shortcuts woring.
    Restart X
    Go to  System Settings -> Keyboard and Mouse -> Keyboard Shortcuts
    I set the volume control in the KMix component section.
    To get the keyboard shortcuts to work, go to the menu editor and select the program you want to create a shortcuts for.  Click on the advanced tab and create the shortcut in the shortcut field.  Save.
    Then go to  System Settings -> Keyboard and Mouse -> Keyboard Shortcuts. Change the component to KHotkeys.  Select the Program and then select the default shortcut that you just created.  (This works for the multimedia keys aswell).
    Hope this helps,
    pudge

  • Font rendering issue / Mountain Lion / non Apple LCD display

    Hello
    This font rendering issue or problem is probably well know by Apple crew too but nobody has solved it yet. Only poor solution are available such as try to adjust manually font rendering by writin some scripts concerning anti alias levels...they really dont solve the problem.
    Could Apple bring us solution to this by developing or updating Mountain Lion?
    So what is the problem: font rendering is very poor in Mountain Lion when using non Apple LCD. For example Fujitsu SL27T-1 LED (LCD displa) shows fonts very nice way in Windows but in Mac OS ML does not. Somebody told me that its about software vs. hardware rendering. Dont know about that but could you bring me the solution which is not advising me to buy Apple display (which is five times more expensive than other manufactures displays).
    Br
    M. Leino

    just want to add that overall fonts look blurry and they are not very sharp.

  • [SOLVED] Bad font rendering after last update (pango issue?)

    I am getting very strange font rendering problem. Look at the screen below. It only affects gtk windows (as you can see below HTML text is currently displayed, but url bar and context menu is not). I belive it appeared after upgrading pango package to 1.32, but downgrading it as instructed here (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151886), didn't help. Does anybody know what can it be? Any hints where to look for the solution?
    Maciej
    Last edited by mamciek (2012-11-20 22:01:45)

    brebs wrote:https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32612?project=1
    That seems to be an issue. Downgrading to  xorg-server 1.13.0-3 resolved problem. Watching ticket for future updates. Thanks a lot
    Last edited by mamciek (2012-11-20 22:02:58)

  • Font rendering issue: Win7+Cp5.5 vs. XP+Cp4

    Hello all, here's the issue: font rendering when publishing under XP is perfect, crisp, and sharp, while on Win 7 looks blurry...
    I tried different versions of Captivate, different fonts, font settings, enabling/disabling cleartype. Nothing works and I'm really desperate to get old XP crisp look. Anyone experienced that? Any ideas? Thanks in advance for sharing.

    The Windows 7 version is definitely anti-aliased while the Xp version is not.
    In Win 7, right click on the desktop, and select Screen Resolution.
    Click the link to Make Text and Other Items Larger or Smaller.
    Make sure it is set to Smaller - 100% (default).
    Click the link in the left navigation panel to Adjust ClearType Text.
    Tick the box to turn on ClearType.
    Does that help?

  • Scaling issues with Windows 8.1 and 3200x1800 displays?

    What about scaling issues with CS6 Illustrator and Photoshop?  I have a hidpi 3200x1800 13" laptop with win 8.1 and can't use the software because of the tiny text.
    Thanks,
    PK
    Sent from my iPhone

    CS6 was released before HiDpi displays were common and there are no adjustments in that program.
    You can try going into Preferences > Interface and changing the UI Font Size to Large.
    You could also try lowering your display resolution until  is decently readable.
    Another step is joining Creative Cloud. Photoshop CC 2014 has 200% UI Scaling.
    $50/month for all apps or $10/month for Photoshop/Lightroom.
    There are intro and educational offers if you can get on them.
    Gene

  • Windows OpenType CFF Font Rendering

    We have a situation where our identity font is displaying terribly in MS Word 2010 on Windows 7. The font looks great in InDesign and Illustrator. The font family is OpenType with PostScript outlines, aka CFF. This behavior is consistent for any OpenType font from Adobe, such as Myriad Pro or Adobe Garamond.
    I am nearly certain that the Windows font rendering engine is optimized for TrueType outlines and renders PostScript outlines poorly. I also think that Adobe is using a different rendering engine for the Creative Suite applications, perhaps their own. I have not been able to find any specific documentation of these statements.
    Does this ring true? Does anyone know of specific documentation of poor font rendering in Windows applications, especially MS Office?

    Argg! I knew it would be something stupid. I spent a lot of time recently trying to get all the exceptions worked out in font embedding and it is all starting to run together.
    Yes, I use flate by default, but I used AsciiHex so I could examine the data easily. Now I'm wondering when this crept in and how much time I wasted. Maybe I don't want to know.
    This fixes the display issue in Acrobat/Reader, but Apple Preview still won't display the font (it substitutions but gives no error). Does anyone know if Apple Preview even supports FontFile3/OpenType?
    Confusingly, Acrobat's Preflight -> PDF Analysis -> "Report PDF syntax issues" still reports the "An unexpected value is associated with the key" error.
    In this case, would extracting the CFF table as is from the OTF be a valid CFF font that could be used, thereby using FontFile3/Type1C and make it compatible with Apple Preview? Just thinking out loud.
    I've updated the file http://www.pagestream.org/fonttest4.pdf to reflect the proper encoding for anyone who might have an inkling to take a look.
    Thank you Leonard for your help!
    Deron

  • Graphics scaling issues in Flash Builder 4.5.1

    Please review this screen shot. Details follow the image.
    FB 4.5.1
    applicationDPI = "160"
    Graphics using MultiDPIBitmapSource scale fairly well.
    Graphics used for these properties do not scale well at all:
    1) ViewMenuItem's "icon" property.
    2) List itemRenderer IconItemRenderer "decorator" property.
    3) TabbedViewNavigatorApplication's "splashScreenImage" property.
    These graphics assets end up with horrible scaling artifacts, making them unusable. So, I cannot use icons with Menus or Lists or a splash image.
    I've reviewed all of Adobe's documentation and followed all of their recommendations for creating graphics assets for use in a mobile applications. Simple graphics with no curved lines or angles less than 90 degrees scale well. Anything else does not.
    Attached is a screen shot comparing the scaling issues at 160, 240 and 320 dpi with applicationDPI = "160". It is using an FXG graphic created in Illustrator CS5.5.
    The FXG graphic was embedded in the s:IconItemRenderer  like this: decorator = "{images.arrow_list_icon}". 
    For testing purposes, I also tried switching the decorator at runtime based on the applicationDPI, but of course this fails as the application still scales the graphic whenever the application's applicationDPI property is specified. 
    <s:List>
    <s:itemRenderer>
    <fx:Component>
    <s:IconItemRenderer
    decorator = "{chooseDecorator()}" 
    <fx:Script>
    //This code selects a different FXG asset based on the DPI reported at runtime. 
    import images.arrow_list_icon160;
    import images.arrow_list_icon240;
    import images.arrow_list_icon320;
    import mx.core.FlexGlobals; 
    protected function chooseDecorator():Class {
        var rtnVal:Class;
        switch (FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication.runtimeDPI) {
            case mx.core.DPIClassification.DPI_160:
                rtnVal=images.arrow_list_icon160;
                break;
            case mx.core.DPIClassification.DPI_240:
                rtnVal=images.arrow_list_icon240;
                break;
            case mx.core.DPIClassification.DPI_320:
                rtnVal=images.arrow_list_icon320;
                break;
        return rtnVal;
    </fx:Script>
    Has anyone come up with methods which can be used to avoid scaling issues with these items when setting the applicationDPI property?

    Chances are that you'll get better answers for this question on the Flex general discussion forum. This forum is visited more by engineers on the tooling team while the latter has people from the Flex SDK team.
    -Anirudh

  • Ugly fonts rendering with poppler-qt-lcd

    Hello,
    These patches don't work on my system.
    All fonts rendering are beautiful, but pdf documents in okular are ugly.
    I have tried ubuntu cairo patches without effects on this issue.
    I have tried also to change hinting parameters in fontconfig without success.
    Here is screenshots.
    With extra/poppler-qt :
    with aur/poppler-qt-lcd :
    The rendering is worst with poppler-qt-lcd !
    Anybody other has this issue ?
    Thank you

    I'm afraid this is a problem with the Cairo backend; the patches just create a bridge between the Qt bindings and the Cairo backend, and instruct Cairo to use subpixel rendering.  Unfortunately, it doesn't always comply.  Since Cairo 1.10 came out, more documents are affected.  You'll notice the following comment was posted on AUR around the time Cairo 1.10 came out:
    Sadly, it seems an increasing number of documents are not properly subpixel-rendered in the Cairo backend, even with these patches. I'm afraid that issue is for other people with more understanding of Cairo internals to solve. (See here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3307 ).

  • Font rendering in certain GTK+ 3 applications

    In some GTK+ 3 applications, fonts appear to have a slightly reddish fuzz and seem a bit unclear; this does not differ by font, so I'm assuming it's a font rendering issue. Is there any known solution to this? I searched around a bit and couldn't find anything.

    Pse wrote:Hmm, looks like the wrong LCD filter is getting picked. What desktop environment are you on? I take it it is not Gnome, is it?
    It's just the default one; I'm using GNOME 3.10.
    genghizkhan91 wrote:Are you using the infinality packages?
    No; just plain fontconfig/freetype2.
    Regular font rendering settings are being used (fully antialiased, slight hinting, rgba, default lcd filter, etc.)
    Edit: Also, note that this issue had been present in several other applications but disappeared recently after certain upgrades; for instance, fonts were similarly fuzzy in the "About" section of most GTK+ 3 applications and the "Notifications" section of GNOME Control Center.
    Last edited by rainbowdashc (2014-03-30 14:16:07)

  • Firefox/Thunderbird Font Rendering changed after upgrade of xulrunner

    Hi guys,
    I experienced a problem with font rendering in the mentioned applications after upgrading xulrunner from 1.9.2.10-1 to 1.9.2.10-2 today. It seems like font smoothing/subpixel rendering does not work as before. After downgrading to 1.9.2.10-1, it worked as expected again.
    To make it more clearly, here is a comparison shot of the two different renderings. The top one is before, the bottom one after the upgrade. You can see that the font at the top is rendered more smoothly.
    And here is a difference image:
    Is anything known about changes which could cause this?
    <edit>I have to correct this. The rendering in thunderbird was obviously not changed by the xulrunner upgrade, but by a separate thunderbird upgrade from 3.1.4-1 to 3.1.4-2.
    <edit2>Additional information: I have the cleartype versions of freetype2, cairo and libxft installed, if that matters.
    Last edited by Singul (2010-09-28 16:40:18)

    Although I am empathetic to the hard (and really great) job the arch devs do, I want to voice my overall agreement with softtower on this issue. Fonts have been an off and on problem for me with arch since the beginning. I understand the devs are doing the best they can, especially when the actual problem is with the moz. devs. But fonts are the major way most users interact with the system, and I can tell you that almost nothing is more aggravating, to me at least, to suddenly "upgrade" and get presented with those really crappy fonts out of the blue. Just saying I understand the frustration, and I think he makes some good points about shipping broken packages and "blaming" it on upstream. If they're broken - don't use them! if possible. "Progress" that breaks stuff isn't really progress, imo.
    hokasch wrote:
    Don't quite get what the fuzz is all about, my fonts look as crisp as ever (on a laptop lcd), the update changed absolutely nothing for me. I never used "fixed" versions of anything, can't really remember how I set up the fonts when I did this installation though (font config advice on the wiki I guess).
    It is not the repo's maintainers job to keep packages synced up with any "fixed" packages in AUR, that is your own responsibility, and bitching about it won't help you any.
    Just pointing out that comments like these aren't really helpful, imho. So you didn't have the problem - that's good to know, but the "fuzz" is about the fact that some of us *DO* have the problem.
    It typically doesn't show up on laptops, btw, only standalone LCDs for some reason (has always been the case for me, at least, with both LCDs and laptops, where the laptop never had the problem). So again, the fuss is that a major usability function got broken from an upgrade that shouldn't get broken, and imo it raises some good, if admittedly difficult to resolve, points, philosophical points, etc. about the packaging and upgrade process,

Maybe you are looking for

  • My phone is barred but by who and why ??

    started just over 24 hrs ago, went to use phone silly little icon on bar signal top left hand side. So checked on line, said that there was a mast in my postcode area down...ok... So went to local o2 shop, had it looked at said no nothing to do with

  • To view FI Vendors with Pymnt Terms and the associated Expense GL Account

    Hi, Is there any report that brings FI Payment Terms from vendors along with the associated G/L EXPENSE accounts ? How can I bring such information? Any help is very welcome. Regards Roger Edited by: rogersapfinance on Nov 10, 2009 9:21 PM Edited by:

  • Problem in passing varchar2 parameter to Evaluate function in OBIEE

    Hi there, This is regarding an issue while passing parameter in EVALUATE function. I have to call a function with varchar parameters. parameter are nothing but my table column values. I've created session variables which holds value from my table col

  • Reading web items in javascript.

    In a 7.0 template, how can I read the value of a web item using javascript? I want to read a filter value from the info field item, manipulate it and assign the resulting value to an input item. How do I access the value?

  • In the Organizer where the add new folders button?

    I want to create some new folders under the My folders section. In the Help section I see "click on the create new folder button." I can't find this button.