Fonts don't look the same when published...

why is it when i publish my site to a folder the fonts on some pages do not appear the same as they show in iweb...
i have 8 pages...
home page looks fine just as in iweb...
the remaining pages have a bolder font and doesn't look nice...
i have checked and double checked every page and all fonts are the same...
helvetica size 15...
why is this happening...?
what can i do...?

In iWeb click on +Help > iWeb Help+. In the pane that opens you'll see a search bar in the upper right corner. Copy & paste the following into it:
If text or a shape gets converted to a graphic
...and hit Enter. That same phrase should appear in the resulting list of +Help Topics+. Double-click it.
Follow the steps outlined under +"To identify items that will be converted to graphics when published:"+
...Do yellow badges appear on the text you're having problems with? If so, your text is being converted to graphics — to view the fonts least likely to be converted, click the Fonts button in the lower-right corner. In the Font panel under Collections, click Web.
On the other hand, if yellow badges don't appear then this may apply:
+"...my text boxes were too small, so a lot of my formatting got messed up when I published the site."+ — Quoted from this old thread:

Similar Messages

Develop module, 1:1 and Export don't look the same, color issues

Hi everybody
I'm using the last version of Lightroom (3.6 if I'm not wrong) and I'm facing a very uncomfortable issue with the Develop module.
I adjusted precisely every color luminance and saturation so it looks rather good in the Develop preview (set to fit), and did an export...
The preview I worked on and the export simply don't look the same.
I work with NEF files from my NIKON D3100 DSLR on a Mac OSX 10.7 MBP.
This cannot be the external display profile not correctly adjusted since I viewed every pictures on the same screen.
I unchecked every boxes from the presets tab in the settings window.
Here are some screenshots and exports.
Fit preview in the Develop module (left) and the actual export of the same picture (right)
Please note I didn't activated any lens correction option and adjusted any color. This is the RAW file and its direct export.
Screenshot of the preview window on top of noise correction options (left) and the same area once I zoomed in in the main preview (right)
I hope this can be corrected or I'm doing something wrong.
A couple of days before today I was using Camera RAW from PS CS5 to correct my NEF and was only keeping exports in JPEG. I decided to use LR 3 on my entire workflow and I'm being skeptical...
Oh right and please forget about every single mystake in my post, I'm a french student.
Thanks !
EDIT : i can join any required file or screenshot if required. I have some other shots having tthe same issue (a lot of ones indeed...)
EDIT 2 : i just found out the picture has much more acurate colors (relatively to the export ones) in the Library module in fit preview (Loupe I guess)

I have the problem on another photo.
I made a screenshot on the screen of my MBP, but it looks the same on any other screen :
Here is the export config :
If you need any other information I can send you them.

How do I keep the action created in Flash (.fla) the same when published in .swf or .html?

I created a complex fixed line and a bird flying on the line using tweens from point A to B to C. When I view the birdline in play or by scrubbing across them in the layers mode, the bird follows the line just as designed. When I test the birdline in "test Scene" or "test movie" one bird flies from point A to C, then another bird appears at point B and flies the course to point C. The published .swf and .html do the same as the test functions. What can I do to get the published version to behave the same as the design?

Rob,
Thanks for your response. There are no error messages in the test functions, and no alerts in the keyframes. They show green.
Attached you will find both the .fla file and the .swf file. I am new at this, so your help is greatly appreciated.
Richard (Sir rpm)
PS- I am sitting in Sweden right now. So I am off to bed and will be back on line in the morning. Please forgive the delay in my response.

AD intigrated DNS servers don't look the same but function perfectly, What am I missing?

I have a fully functional Active Directory network with integrated DNS servers (2). When I look at one of the DNS servers (both 2008R2 Domain Controllers) under the forward lookup zones I see all of my workstations, servers and other network devices
as I would expect to see them however when I look at the other DNS server all I see is what appears to be stub zone data.
On the questionable server I see
SOA start of authority listing
Name server XXXXXXXXX
Name Server XXXXXXXXX
and one host(A) record for a server
But there are no workstation or other servers in my network listed.
If I query the questionable server it replys with the correct DNS information as though it is resolving the address query but I just see no workstation or server listings under Forward lookup zones.
I can run dcdiag /test:dns and it all passes with the exception of a few failed external root servers which I see now and then. DNS testing tells me it is all working and I have no errors in my system logs.
Shouldn't I be seeing an exact copy of DNS records on both servers or did something change?
All DNS tests I have run tell me everything is well and good but I am not seeing what I think I should be seeing.
HELP

Hi,
If your qeustionable DNS server and the another DNS sever are in the same domain and both of them are the AD integrated zone, we should see the exact copy of DNS records on both servers.
Please try to trigger the replication of the domain controller then reload and refresh the DNS zone.
If it doesn't work, please try to create a test record on the questionable server, then check if the record has been replicated to the another server.
Best Regards.
Steven Lee Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Pictures don't look the same inside Photoshop

They look better, which is bad. I save them to a folder, or upload them to the web, and they just don't look as good. I've read some "solutions" but they never seem to work. Photoshop does not reflect what the images show in Windows (folder, preview, browser). I am only interested in working on what it will look like on the computer, not what it will look like when I print it. I don't care about that (not for this project, anyway).

You should read this: http://www.calibrize.com/primer1.html
Then download and run this free calibration software:
http://www.calibrize.com/

Pictures moved from iPhoto to iWeb don't look the same

When I move a photo album from iPhoto to an iWeb album page the photos are darker and more saturated. I would think the color space should be the same for both.
Does anybody have an answer?
thanks.

I was having this or a very similar problem a couple of updates ago here is what fixed it for me:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8959818#8959818
Hope this helps.

Collecting forms - do the forms look the same when collected?

I have a 5 page registration form. I want to the customer to fill it out online and click "submit" to send it to me. Will the response be formatted the same as it appeared to customer? Will I receive a filled-out registration form I can print and save if I want to? I also want them to have to option to pay online as well.

FormsCentral is designed in such a way that only the user's data is submitted, not the whole form. When viewing the responses users have submitted you will be viewing them in a table that is similar to Excel (numbered rows and labeled columns). As for payments, FormsCentral has support for PayPal payments. Details are at: Getting Started with Payment Processing using PayPal
-Jeff

Lightroom images do not look the same when opened in PSCS5

Hi,
I am using LR 3 and PS CS5, but have an annoying problem which I don't know how to fix. Basically, when I look at an image fit in window inside LR 3, it looks real well as far as contrast and saturation and hue... when I choose Edit In Photoshop CS5, the file opens in PS but the contrast and saturation and even hue are slightly off. Why?
Thanks,
Juan

Juan, note that in Develop Lightroom does not use all of the available raw data at once to give you a preview. It does this as otherwise, the program would be unusably slow. Every move of a slider would have to result in a complete rerendering of the data at full resolution and then downscale the image to screen resolution. Even on the very fastest machines out there this still takes about a second which would make everything glacial especially on normal computers. So in zoomed out views, it simply takes a subset of the raw data at lower resolution and uses that to render. This can subtly affect saturation in cases where there is a lot of fine color detail because there is no averaging going on to arrive at the lower res image. When you zoom in to 1:1, Lightroom simply renders only the small subset of the image that you see in your window. Because this is only a small subset, this is again very fast, but is now done at the full resolution. In Develop, you will only in 1:1 see Lightroom apply noise reduction and sharpening which can also affect apparent saturation at zoomed out levels. This will certainly remain an issue until we are a few generations further on Moore's curve. However at that point the resolution of cameras will have increased by the exact same amount making the problem remain.
Now consider what happens when you go to Photoshop. Lightroom (or ACR when you use "edit in Photoshop") renders the image from the raw into usually a 16-bit prophotoRGB tiff. This is then opened in Photoshop. Photoshop does NOT know how to deal with raw data. It needs a fully rendered RGB image which is supplied either by ACR or Lightroom. Now, since you have a fully rendered image, scaling down is very easy. However, you no longer have the freedom to reinterpret the raw data. The model used in Photoshop is very different from Lightroom and therefore different restrictions apply.
In Lightroom's Library views, a prerendered jpeg is used for the display. This means that in Library view, the image is scaled down from a fully rendered image and should show a desaturation with respect to Develop when you have lots of fine color detail. Note that neither Lightroom's Library preview and Photoshop's scaled down preview are actually accurate. Both scale in a gamma corrected space, but only for display. To compound this, Lightroom scales down using a different algorithm than Photoshop (which uses several mechanisms based on the zoom level - i.e. whether it is divisible by two). It is simply impossible to highly accurately display a high resolution image on a very low resolution computer display. You always have to deal with scaling, for which there exists no most correct method. They all have issues (certainly Photoshop's silly method does).
Lastly, many people that see subtle (or even extreme) differences between Photoshop and Lightroom actually have a problem with their monitor profile. Make sure to recalibrate your monitor and when you do, make sure that the calibration software generates a v2 profile (most profiling software has this option in the advanced setup). Lightroom treats v4 LUT monitor profiles differently than Photoshop. This difference will be gone in a v2 matrix profile.

How do I make my animation look the same in different browsers?

Hi!
When I play my animation in different browsers it don't look the same as in the preview. In IE some of the parts of the animation have disappeared and in Chrome the pats are no longer in their right places. See picture below.
How do I do to make the animations look the same in different browsers?
(In the end I want to use the animations in my captivate 8 project. )
BR,
M

Ah, found the issue, the problem is with the name of the two images,
genomförande (instead you can use genomforande)
Grå bakgrund (instead you can use grabakgrund)
Seems like IE is having issue with those special characters.
hth,
Vivekuma

FileSystemTree and "ordinary" Tree - make them look the same?

Hi,
I wondered if anyone's worked with Adobe AIR's FileSystemTree and the "ordinary" Tree in Adobe Flex, making them look the same? If so, can you give me some hints on how to make them look the same when it comes to icons, disclosure icons, branches, leafs etc.?
The reason I'm asking is this:
Some time ago I decided it'd be nice to build a sort of FTP Client with Adobe AIR. The client would, among other things, have a tree for local folders and a tree for remote folders. It seemed ideal to use the FileSystemTree for the tree containing local folders. The tree with remote folders is built using the "ordinary" Tree with data supplied via a Microsoft .NET Web Service. However, once I started down this road I soon realized the two controls don't look and behave the same (even though FileSystemTree apparently derives from Tree).
Some examples:
- Tree seems to use easing when opening a folder. FileSystemTree just "opens it".
- FileSystemTree displays a disclosure arrow icon regardless of whether or not a directory has children. Haven't got the Tree to display the same icon when a remote directory is empty.
Any help would be appreciated! I'd also like to point out that I'm quite new to both AIR and Flex so maybe the problems I see are actually easy to solve.
//Marcus

There is no bookmarks tab, expect you are referring to the bookmarks menu on the menu bar ("File, Edit, View, History, Bookmarks, Tools, Help") on your XP system.
Once your restore your menus on you Window 7 system, you can get rid of the bookmarks button. After going through the 10 steps below your toolbars on your Windows 7 system will be more usable again and like your XP system, none of which has anything to do with Sync.
You can make '''Firefox 6.0.1''' look like Firefox 3.6.*, see numbered '''items 1-10''' in the following topic [http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/firefox/firefox-problems.htm#fx4interface Fix Firefox 4.0 toolbar user interface, problems (Make Firefox 4.0 thru 8.0, look like 3.6)]. ''Whether or not you make changes, you should be aware of what has changed and what you have to do to use changed or missing features.''
* http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/firefox/firefox-problems.htm#fx4interface
the first 9 steps above are basic toolbar customization the following link is in step #1 above. (See before/after picture (.png) in the footnote)
*How do I customize the toolbars? | How to | Firefox Help
*:https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/how-do-i-customize-toolbars
<br><small>Please mark "Solved" one answer that will best help others with a similar problem -- hope this was it.</small>
There is a lot more beyond those first 10 steps listed, if you want to make Firefox more functional.
Before and after customizations, the following also includes [http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/firefox/firefox-problems.htm#fx4styles styling changes] besides rearranging toolbars and toolbar items.
* http://dmcritchie.mvps.org/icons/fx4toolbars.png
*:Bookmarks toolbar -- [http://userstyles.org/styles/46947 Bookmarks Toolbar Fx4 Blue/Folders, Red/Bookmarks]
*:Tab borders -- [http://userstyles.org/styles/24728 Tab Color Underscoring active/read/unread (Fx3.6)] red=active tab, blue=read, green=unread, magenta(not shown)=loading

We have an older IMac (preIcloud) and just purchased a new Macbook Air. Our Iphones are set-up to synch with the IMAC and my calendars on the IMac & the phone look the same. But when I open ICal on the MacBook Air my calendar is missing items? Help..

We have an older IMac (preIcloud) and just purchased a new Macbook Air. Our Iphones are set-up to synch with the IMAC and my calendars on the IMac & the phone look the same. But when I open ICal on the MacBook Air my calendar is missing items? Help.

Are you wanting to import iCal to the MacBook Air. Since iCloud doesn't work with 10.6 OSX you probably don't have any data in iCloud yet?

Convert a PDF that was originally a publisher doc into word will it look the same as my PDF

Can I convert a PDF that was originally a publisher doc into word doc will it look the same as my PDF?

pguerett wrote:
1. The highlighting of the fields that Acrobat does is affecting the visiblity of your underline. Turn off the highlighting.
Paul, isn't this setting part of acrobat itself and not something one can "set" in the document? Opening pdf forms on my computer does not show the fields to be highlighted.
Which version of Designer did you use to create the form?
It looks like the same version I had quoted above.
I originally created a form that was based off of an existing PDF image. I had just put the fields "on top of" the scanned image that the PDF contained. The result was too ugly for me, so I copy and pasted all my fields over onto a new empty static form and created what I posted above.
Looking at the original "ugly" form's XML it looks like the version of the software didn't change:
<?xfa generator="AdobeLiveCycleDesignerES_V8.2.1.4029.1.523496" APIVersion="2.8.9029.0"?>
Also, the "right" attribute exists in the original "ugle" PDF document that is dated 5/3/2009 if that helps any.
I followed your instructions and removed "right" and that fixed the problem. Looks like LiveCycle's XML parser needs an additional validation check! I had wondered what that "right" thing was since when I was looking through all the settings I didn't see a corrisponding setting. I had just assumed that it was some internal setting I wasn't supposed to care about. Good catch!
Thanks for your help Paul!

My UI preferences are set to identical settings in Illustrator and InDesign, why don't they look the same?

My UI preferences are set to identical settings in Illustrator and InDesign ("scale to lower supported scale factor") and AI looks perfect, ID is too big. Why don't they look the same if the settings are the same? Driving me CRAZY. I have my windows scaling factor at 124% and it needs to stay enlarged, otherwise nothing else on my system will be readable. The inconsistency of the workspaces is so annoying.

Hello billwoodard11,
Thanks for the question. If your computer is not compatible with HD 1080p content, you should receive a prompt stating so - but should still be able to download the content for use on other devices. For more information, check out this resource:
Purchasing and viewing HD videos in iTunes - Apple Support
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201850
How to purchase, download, or view HD 1080p content
iTunes 10.6 by default is set to purchase, download, and playback HD content in 720p. You must change your local preference setting if you prefer to download, purchase, and playback HD content in 1080p. Depending on your computer's hardware configurations, you may be unable to purchase, rent, or playback content in 1080p. iTunes may display the following dialog:
On Mac or PC
Download the latest version of iTunes. You can download iTunes for free.
From the iTunes menu, choose iTunes > Preferences > Store (for PC, choose Edit > Preferences > Store).
Next to "When downloading High Definition videos, prefer:" set your preference to 1080p1.
Click OK. Now, when you purchase or download HD content, your computer will always download in 1080p, when available.
Depending on your computer's hardware limitations, you may be unable to purchase, rent, or view HD content from the iTunes Store. If you are trying to view HD video on an external display, the display must have a digital connection (DVI, DisplayPort, or HDMI) and support HDCP.
Check out the following resource for information on downloading past purchases, including information on playing purchases on Apple TV:
Download past purchases - Apple Support
http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT2519
Thanks,
Matt M.

My document don't print the same color when I print it from PDF rather than InDesign

I have a vector image that don't print the same color when I export it to PDF but the colors are the same on the screen.
How can I be sure to have the same colors as my InDesign original document when I print it as a PDF ?

I use the default settings for High Quality Print

I don't remember my password and one of the security questions for my account. I also don't have the same email account now as i did when I signed up. Help?

I don't remember my password and one of the security questions for my account. I also don't have the same email account now as i did when I signed up.
I want to figure out my old password and/or change the new email to my current one.
thanks

You can try getting the password reset via this page : http://iforgot.apple.com
If you can't then you will need to contact iTunes Support / Apple in your country to get the password and your questions reset.
Contacting Apple about account security : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5699
When they've been reset (and if you don't already have a rescue email address) you can then use the steps half-way down this page to add a rescue email address to your account for potential future use : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5312

Fonts don't look the same when published...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for