Fonts Folio 11 - Burned optical media

Hi group,
I just bought from ebay Adobe Fonts Folio 11. I asked and was told that this was an actual Adobe disc. What I got is a burned discs. It looks like a Rimage printed burned CD-ROM. I just want to make sure that this is not right. Anyone here who has a boxed copy of Adobe Fonts Folio 11, can you confirm that the CD-ROM is manufactured? It should look silver-ish on the bottom and the printing would be offset quality.
I think I have a counterfiet here.

No, not at all. And I have done that in the past. You see I have waited Folio 8 for a long time. He claimed to have a 20 user license and that he could sell one. My thought was that a 5 user is $2,999 new from Adobe, which values each license at roughly $600. The start bid was for $199. The auction ended and the price never went higher. So I got it for $199.
Prior to bidding I asked if this was absolutely an Adobe disc. The reply said that it was. I asked if it was verison 11.1with 2,400 OpenType fonts. The reply said no, it was just v11 and had 2,100 fonts. I checked with Adobe's site and it seemed to match up with v11 on the site. So I bid and won.
Got it in today and I myself work in replication and have even written a book on DVD authoring and menu design. So I know what a manufactured disc should look like. And I also have Rimage for short run burning for clients. and this disc looks just like a Rimage or an Everist disc to me. It is not manufactured.
Now, I can tell you I bought a $1,000 app from Sonic Solutions once and it came on Burned media dorectly from them. So I know some companies, even large one, use burned media if the product itself doesn't have a wide audience. I don't know how popular Fonts Folio is and so I thought I should ask before I fill in the ebay claim that this is bogus.

Similar Messages

  • Burning optical media

    I asked a while back about burning DVDs with a Plextor PX-716A unit in my beige G3. Short version: Burning stalls and makes shiny coasters. I hadn't tried a CD, but they apparently don't work either. When attempting to burn an iTunes playlist, it said the machine's burn speed was too low. (I reset the iTunes prefs sequentially down to 16x, though the drive's speed is listed at 48x; got three coasters for my troubles.) I have now tried using Toast Titanium 6.1: Like burning DVDs, it works fine into the first data file, then stalls. Is this drive merely incompatible with the rest of the hardware/software? Or did I maybe get a bad unit?

    Hm. Are you using the hard drive on the original controller? The bandwidth is 16.67MBps per channel, I think... it might even be constrained to 16.67MBps for both channels combined.
    If so, that means you're using the same channel to both read from the HDD, and write to the burner.... which will quickly get you in trouble, as you've no doubt noticed.
    Your drive also might be pretty fragmented.. you could try optimizing it. What hard drive are you using? If you're still using the same one that came with it, it's time for a new one. . . as it's really not fast enough (though 1x speeds on a CD-RW putting out coasters do indicate something else is wrong).
    RAM could be an issue, as the poster above just mentioned... they also mentioned checking "Simulation Mode" in Toast, which should appear as an option before burning. This simulates writing, but doesn't, so you don't lose a disk if you get an underrun.
    Personally, I can burn 16x media with no issue at all on this Mac.. would sometimes get underruns when I was at 300 MHz (G3), but none after I OCed it and none at G4 speeds. 16x is about 2.3MBps, and a 1x DVD burns at I think around 1.5MBps.... so clearly it's DVD-capable.
    The burner is on the original ATA/3 channel, but all my hard drives are on an ATA/66 PCI card.
    I assume nothing's running in the background... and that, if you're using Tiger, it's not currently indexing files which would seriously slow down anything.
    I don't know if it is the same on DVDs (never burned one), but I seem to remember when I tried selecting "Write Session," it never worked. In Toast 7, that's under the file menu Recorder:-> Recorder Settings| Then the "Advanced" file tab, and there are two radio buttons.. try selecting Write Disc if it's set to Write Session. Also select Buffer Underrun Prevention if it's available and unselected (mine's gray, for some reason, though it really shouldn't be).
    Also, I seem to remember CD-Rs never working when I did track-at-once.. I'm pretty sure that's the case, anyway. If you're doing Audio CDs, try "DAO" not "TAO."
    Perhaps the best thing you can do to start off with would be to defragment your drive with some optimization software like Techtool Pro or DiskWarrior. If you don't have enough RAM, that could easily be the issue... and if you're running your drive off the old ATA/3, or if you're using the original drive, that could also be it... old, slow drives with high rotational latency (slow 5400RPM speeds) and ultra-low areal density (like, 2GB per platter..) will not be a boon in this case, especially when dealing with lots of smaller files.

  • Aperture: How to burn images to optical media -- DVD, CD

    Howdy,
    Aperture: How to burn images to optical media
    Here:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305041
    Thanks
    victor

    Hi,
    Can you please tell us your operating system and why you want to burn them to CD.
    For example, on a Windows system, if you just want to save a copy of the images to CD then you could use the organizer. Select the images you want to copy, go to the File menu and select Copy/Move to Removable Drive. Do NOT check the Move option as this would the remove the images from the hard drive.
    Brian

  • How to find/download media for Adobe Font Folio 11?

    we purchased the license, and it is supposed to be a download. I only got the serial number, but no media...

    Hello Houcine,
    The download for the Font Folio should be avaiable in your Adobe account.
    Check this link:-
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/find-download-link.html
    Thanks,
    Manish Sharma

  • Font Folio 11 - How to install/manage?

    I just bought Font Folio 11 (gulp!)  So now what do I do?
    I don't want to drag/drop 3000 fonts onto my system and boggle it down.  I guess I was under the assumption that for $2500 it came with at least a basic viewer/manager, but no.
    I got a trial of Suitcase Fusion, but I can only seem to install one font at a time.
    Help, please!

    There is no installer or uninstaller for Font Folio. It is simply a disk full of fonts. Since there are so many ways in which various users may wish to install and/or manage fonts, it simply didn't make sense for Adobe to try imposing any one such manner on everyone. Plus, virtually no one in their right mind would attempt to install all fonts at one time.
    Installation of fonts is normally quite simple, but varies from operating system to operating system and version to version. Drag and drop OpenType font files works in most situations where you want a copy of a font installed in a known, system font location. Windows 7 allows right clicking one or more OpenType or TrueType font files with context menu items that allow for installation or installation via links. (Note that you wouldn't normally install via a link to a CD or DVD given that you wouldn't normally have such an optical media mounted at all times. And of course, if you are using any font manager, such software typically provides its own mechanism for font installation, activation, deactivation, etc.
              - Dov

  • Are there any recovery tools for optical media?

    I've had a couple of DVD's  turned in to coasters recently and I was hoping that Linux could come to my rescue with some awesome 'raw-read' / recovery tools for optical media?
    I burnt the discs in Windows 7 using InfraRecorder on a brand new Plextor drive (a 'PX-891SA') and these are my first attempts to burn discs with it so I'm a bit worried it could be a hardware fault!
    I started off trying to back up some files to clear some space on my hard-drive, burning them to a dual-layer dvd, but the software kept failing to even start the burn process -- that was until I realised that I needed to run the program "as Administrator" (in Windows). It did then manage to burn the disc (I was using "Session-at-Once" mode) however when it came to the end of the burn process / the start of the 'verify data' phase it threw an error saying the write process had failed! Windows couldn't access the disc / data and (I think) still thought the disk was empty. So I restarted the burning application and used a function to just 'close' the whole disc. This seemed to work because Windows was then able to recognise the disc and read the data, although accessing the disc was slow and sounded 'stutter' ish.
    I then tried to write a single layer dvd to finish off the last couple of gig I had to back up, but again the software completed the burn phase only to report a 'fail' error right at the end (I'm assuming) before finalising the disc. Although this time I'd tried to create a multi-session disc by using the '2XXA' (or something) 'Multi-Session' iso9660 format. The result was that Windows couldn't read the disc and still thought it was empty, even after trying a forced 'close disc' operation! -- Linux however could read the disc and see that the data had in fact been burnt to the disc (although I've not yet tried copying it in Linux!).
    Finally I needed to burn a load of archives to a couple of discs (totaling ~9GiB) -- starting with a dual-layer dvd first everything seemed to be working fine, the burn process started okay and the write buffer was full etc., until at what I assume was the layer change-over it all came to a grinding halt and threw another 'write operation failed' error, only this time I can't even mount the disk in Linux....see 'dmesg | tail' output below:
    [ 5758.353005] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
    [ 5758.353015] ISOFS: Interleaved files not (yet) supported.
    [ 5758.353016] ISOFS: File unit size != 0 for ISO file (1472).
    [ 5758.353019] ISOFS: changing to secondary root
    [ 5758.353035] ISOFS: Interleaved files not (yet) supported.
    [ 5758.353036] ISOFS: File unit size != 0 for ISO file (1536).
    [ 5758.353037] isofs_fill_super: root inode is not a directory. Corrupted media?
    Does anyone have any thought or suggestions that might help?
    - Is it likely to be a hardware fault? (I bought a Plextor because I thought they were one of the best!)
    Maybe even if I could just close the session all would not be lost?
    -- Thanks in advance --
    >>>> UPDATE >>>>
    I tried to use ddrescue....it was fine until it got to the end of the disk and then it sounded like the drive was chewing on a bag of pork scratchings
    $ sudo ddrescue -v /dev/sr0 /mnt/odd/ddr.file ~/ddr.log
    GNU ddrescue 1.16
    About to copy 4029 MBytes from /dev/sr0 to /mnt/odd/ddr.file
    Starting positions: infile = 0 B, outfile = 0 B
    Copy block size: 128 sectors Initial skip size: 128 sectors
    Sector size: 512 Bytes
    Press Ctrl-C to interrupt
    rescued: 4028 MB, errsize: 983 kB, current rate: 0 B/s
    ipos: 4028 MB, errors: 1, average rate: 3310 kB/s
    opos: 4028 MB, time since last successful read: 10.8 m
    Splitting failed blocks...
    Interrupted by user
    ...it was taking forever and getting nowhere so I just pressed 'ctrl+c'.....here's the log file:
    # Rescue Logfile. Created by GNU ddrescue version 1.16
    # Command line: ddrescue -v /dev/sr0 /mnt/odd/ddr.file /home/shodan/ddr.log
    # current_pos current_status
    0xF0213000 /
    # pos size status
    0x00000000 0xF0208000 +
    0xF0208000 0x0000B000 -
    0xF0213000 0x0000D000 /
    0xF0220000 0x00000400 -
    0xF0220400 0x0001FE00 /
    0xF0240200 0x00000400 -
    0xF0240600 0x0003FE00 /
    0xF0280400 0x00000400 -
    0xF0280800 0x00077600 /
    0xF02F7E00 0x00000200 -
    When I tried to mount the output file using $ sudo mount -ro loop /mnt/odd/ddr.file /mnt/vodd I got the same error as with the actual disc (natch)...
    mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0,
    missing codepage or helper program, or other error
    In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
    dmesg | tail or so
    Last edited by wwgfd (2012-12-14 13:18:41)

    @chris_l -- yeah I was worried that might be the case, still I'm not sure if that explains why it keeps failing the burn process part way through?
    I've tried this and that in Linux but without much luck. I'm still quite a noob with a lot of Linux things and this is the first time I'm trying anything to do with optical disks/drives etc. so I'm learning as I go...
    The disk that failed in Windows but was 'readable' in Linux did just pass a run through ddrescue -- i.e. it created an output file okay and did not report any errors in the process.
    However when I mounted the resulting image and tried to copy the files across the first folder reported an "input/ouput error" (just using gui copy+paste in Thunar file manager)
    ...the other folders did copy okay though!
    It seems as though it's the lead-in / lead-out and disc finalizing process that are the main fail points with the burn operation. I don't know if InfraRecorder is any good or likely to be the problem? Anyway the drive cam with Nero (inc. Linux version) so might give either or both of these a go too, if they don't work either then at least I wont be short of something to rest a mug o' tea on
    @ chris_l (again) -- the Plextor drives do have a "Vari-Rec" feature which allows a user to 'tweak' the laser power / output level so I might try this too.
    @alphaniner -- thanks I've not seen this package before, I'm guessing it's a bit like cdparanoia but for dvds?!
    Thanks for the help!
    (pre-post) UPDATE >>> I've just mounted my Windows partition  in Linux so I'll have a crack at burning the files using cdrtools before I resort to throwing the dvd drive out of the window and chasing it around the yard with a lump hammer

  • Can't Burn Optical Disks on Powermac G5

    I have two DVD drives on my PowerMac System - the original Pioneer drive in the tower and an external TDK drive (2004 vintage) that can be attached by either firewire or USB2. Neither drive will accept a DVD or CD to burn after installation of Tiger. Here's what happens:
    When I insert the disk, I get a message that says:
    "The disk cannot be used because it is not recognized."
    If I go to the disk utility and request additional information, however, it clearly shows the drive, the media type (even though it does not show up on the desktop) and the media characteristics, e.g.:
    "Media is present: Yes
    Media is busy: No
    Media Type: DVD-RW
    Media is blank: Yes
    Media is appendable: Yes." etc. etc.
    This information is shown for both the internal Pioneer drive and the external TDK drive.
    Finally, when I try to erase the drive in Disk Utility, I get the following message:
    "Erase of optical media did not complete or completed with error."
    I have tried this with DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+RW, CD-R, CD-RW media. Same results in every case.
    HOWEVER: HERE'S WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING: I can burn any supported optical disk on the internal drive of my MacBook Pro AND I can burn disks with the TDK drive attached to the MacBook Pro via USB2 but NOT attached via the Firewire port!!!! (The TDK drive will NOT burn on the PowerMac G5 regardless of how attached.)
    Both optical drives were working on the PowerMac under Tiger and only stopped working after the Leopard install. Has anyone else had this burn problem on a PowerMac G5? I've found a few problems identified in this forum on reading installation disks, but few on burning CD/DVDs after installation. Is there a simple fix I'm not finding in the Leopard support resources or is this a significant bug in the 10.5 release?
    Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
    Mike

    This gets more strange by the moment. Toast will see AND burn the blank DVD/CDs when inserted, at least when using the PowerMac's internal Pioneer burner. (I haven't tried it on the external TDK burner.) I changed DVD/CD System Preferences from "Show in Finder" to "Launch Toast Titanium" and had no problems. The application launched on DVD insert and did the data burn flawlessly, though a bit slower than I remember it being on Tiger.
    But there is still this inconsistency between the PowerMac and the MacBook Pro. On the former, Leopard simply refuses to recognize any media placed in the internal burner, but on the MacBook Pro insertion of a DVD/CD functions just like Tiger used to - mounts the untitled media on the desktop, allows drag and drop file adds, and allows burning by OSX finder or menu. Has to be some strange bug in Leopard code for a PowerMac G5.

  • How can i download the font folio education essentials?

    My company provided me with a license serial number for the Font Folio Education Essnetials but I don't have the product. My company has an Adobe Software Assurance subscription for several products but they can't seem to provide me guidance on getting the product and they told me they don't have media. Any help or suggestions?

    Since this is a user to user forum, neither officially nor regularly monitored by Adobe, your chances of getting a quick response are rather low.
    In the meantime, try to see if any of these results can be of help to you:
    http://www.google.com/webhp#hl=en&q=Where+can+I+buy+%27Adobe+Font+Folio+Education+Essentia ls%27+in+the+UK%3F&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=Where+can+I+buy+%27Adobe+Font+Folio+Education+Essentials%27+in+the+UK%3F&aqi=&fp=OzgK0dwM7rU

  • Best optical media you use

    Hi, I want to discuss the manufacturers of optical medias you use . The standard optical drive which came with our MacBooks is picky about the shining circles we put inside, so I'm interested to hear about your experiences with it . Share your wisdom!
    Personally, the only DVDs I've been using so far were Verbatim. I'm fairly happy with it, but I believe that there is better option, though.
    P.S. Is there any difference between DVD-R and DVD+R formats (one better than another etc.). I know it's topic people can talk to death .

    I see you double posted in the Network topic...anyway here's my reply:
    Go to cdfreaks.com "Blank Media" forum and have a read:
    http://club.cdfreaks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=33
    Here's a poll for the best DVD+ media:
    http://club.cdfreaks.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=1655
    DVD+R Taiyo Yuden are rated the best for long term storage. With DVD+R Mitsubishi / Verbatim recommended second.
    Here' a poll for the best DVD- media for long term storage:
    http://club.cdfreaks.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=1654
    Results are the same as DVD+.
    It's a very interesting forum...basically users looking for the perfect burn. I've replaced my old Apple 2X DVD burner in my QuickSilver with a $30.00 LiteON (Sony) 16X burner and flashed it with CD Freaks firmware for perfect and faster burns...or close to it anyway. But you'll need to use Windows machine to update firmware...pain in the butt!

  • Typekit account for registered font folio owners

    Hi there,
    I would like to request that owners of font folio be given a free permanent typekit account so that those purchased fonts can be used on the web as well as in images, and on physical media.
    I purchased a single user licence of font folio 11 this year and it's hugely disappointing that I can't use these fonts on the web. Of course many companies will have paid thousands of pounds for font folio and they should clearly have full access to these fonts for web usage. I will soon be a freelance web designer and this would emmencly help myself and all the graphic/web designers out there.
    I'm aware that Adobe have recenlty purchased typekit and that some of those fonts which we have received in font folio are now available in the service. I believe it sends out the wrong message that users who pirate Adobe's fonts and use them on the web with the @fontface method will continue to do so and people who have paid out a significant amount of money to legally use the fonts are being limited/penalised.
    As a request can those users who have registered their font folio be given a free permanent typekit account?
    Further to this is would be a fantastic service to have ALL of the font folio fonts available on typekit for the law obiding purchaser to use.
    Many thanks
    Phil

    I've just signed up to have a look around typekit. It looks fantastic, however the fonts i want to use are not included in the free version.
    My favourite fonts are ITC Avant Garde, Futura, Helvetica, Americana, Clarendon LT... I think most designers would appreciate some of these commonly used fonts. It would be nice to add some of these fonts to the typekit package.
    So in summary there's already a service offering the tech - minus some essential design fonts. What about a typekit package called font-folio owners? This gives full access to all fonts that have been purchased. Probably worth mentioning while i'm here that I don't think designers are aware that a single user licence of font folio can be purchased. I phoned up Adobe direct to ask if you had any plans to release one, much to my surprise you'd just started offering the deal.
    I don't think it would do any harm if you promoted the single user licence on adobe.com and typekit.com - from scouring the internet forums freelance designers are unaware and would love it.
    Sorry about the manager comment, I didn't realise you were one. Since you have the influence to make this happen what about that font folio package on typekit or full access to professional typekit package?
    Edit: Also just noticed a pre-existing feature of importing purchased fonts - maybe this method would be quicker and easier to implement a font folio option?
    I'm excited about the potential of typekit now.
    Many thanks

  • Font Folio OpenType Edition

    Press Release Source: Adobe Systems Incorporated
    Adobe Announces OpenType Edition of Font Folio
    Monday August 11, 8:12 am ET
    New Version Offers the Adobe Type Library in Enhanced Cross-Platform Font Format
    SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 11, 2003--Adobe Systems Incorporated (Nasdaq:ADBE - News), the leader in network publishing, today introduced a new version of Adobe® Font Folio(TM) featuring the Adobe Type Library in OpenType® format on one CD-ROM. The Adobe Font Folio (OpenType Edition) product contains more than 2,000 fonts in OpenType format, which allows for richer linguistic support and more advanced typographic control in any print, Web or dynamic media project. Adobe also announced the availability of a new special version with a 10-computer license, making it more affordable for small design shops to access the entire Adobe Type Library.
    Adobe and Microsoft Corporation created the OpenType font format to improve cross-platform document portability and simplify font management, by introducing one font file that works on both the Macintosh and Windows platforms. Creative professionals benefit from extended foreign language support and the inclusion of expert typographic glyphs, such as small caps, old style figures and swashes, in many OpenType fonts.
    "The OpenType font format is much more convenient than the old Type 1 or TrueType fonts," said David Blatner, co-author of Real World InDesign, InDesign for QuarkXPress Users and Real World Photoshop. "With Adobe's new Font Folio in OpenType format, I love having large character sets in the same font instead of having to work with a whole array of related font files."
    Pricing and Availability
    The Adobe Font Folio [OpenType Edition] product is available immediately and will be sold primarily through the Adobe store at www.adobe.com, Adobe retail and licensing channels, and includes a standard 20-computer license for US$8,999. License extensions are also available and Font Folio is included in Adobe's transactional and contractual licensing programs. Upgrade pricing from Font Folio versions 8 or 9 to Font Folio OpenType Edition is US$2,499. Adobe is also releasing a special 10-computer license of Font Folio OpenType Edition for smaller design workplaces that is available for US$4,999. International English versions are available where localized versions are not sold.
    Full Press Release:
    http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200308/081103FONTFOLIO.html
    Product page:
    http://www.adobe.com/products/fontfolio/main.html

    > "Adobe's applications DO allow selection of the individually styled fonts." Or something like that.
    No, they don't. At least not as I understand the term. When Mac users talk about not being able to see fonts in Windows, they mean they can't see each and every variant in the font menu as a separate entry. So, Times Bold sits alongside Times Itals and Times Bold Itals in the font menu, and you can get from TNR Bold to Minion Pro Itals with one mouse click. In Adobe apps, you can't do this and you don't see all the variants in the one menu - you have a font family menu and a variant (or style) menu. You have to choose the font family first, then the variant, and you can't get from TNR Bold to Minion Pro Itals with one mouse click.
    Although Adobe apps do style-link all font variants (a great advantage over Windows default limit of four family members), you are still choosing the family, then the style. In this, it's no different from choosing bold, itals, and bold itals in other Windows apps like Word, Ventura, FrameMaker, etc (and my post was referring only to these three variants, not to styles like black, condensed, etc, which may show up as separate entries). So, I stick by my statement that "bold, italic, and bold italic variations don't show up as separate fonts in menus in Windows apps".
    (And Dov's right, we don't know this is the user's problem, but I was just raising a common issue, based on the limited info we had at hand.)

  • What's new in Font Folio 11.1?

    Looks like Font Folio 11.1 released today, per http://adobe.com/products/fontfolio.
    Can anyone tell us what is new in the past 5 years? I had hoped for some better glyph coverage in fonts like Utopia, but I don't see any evidence of that in the documentation, but I'm still hopeful?
    The list of 80 additional fonts does not seem all that exciting for Western users, but perhaps much more so for users of other Arabic, Hebrew, Devanagari, etc.
    Comparing the PDF font listings, here's what the new faces are:
    HypatiaPro-ExtraLight.otfHypatiaPro-ExtraLightIt.otfHypatiaPro-Light.otfHypatiaPro-LightIt.otfHypatiaPro-Regular.otfHypatiaPro-It.otfHypatiaPro-Semibold.otfHypatiaPro-SemiboldIt.otfHypatiaPro-Bold.otfHypatiaPro-BoldIt.otfHypatiaPro-Black.otfHypatiaPro-BlackIt.otfKinesisPro3-Light.otfKinesisPro3-LightItalic.otfKinesisPro3-Regular.otfKinesisPro3-Italic.otfKinesisPro3-Semibold.otfKinesisPro3-SemiboldItalic.otfKinesisPro3-Bold.otfKinesisPro3-BoldItalic.otfKinesisPro3-Black.otfKinesisPro3-BlackItalic.otfAdobeTextPro-Regular.otfAdobeTextPro-It.otfAdobeTextPro-Semibold.otfAdobeTextPro-SemiboldIt.otfAdobeTextPro-Bold.otfAdobeTextPro-BoldIt.otfTrajanPro3-ExtraLight.otfTrajanPro3-Light.otfTrajanPro3-Regular.otfTrajanPro3-Semibold.otfTrajanPro3-Bold.otfTrajanPro3-Black.otfTrajanSansPro-ExtraLight.otfTrajanSansPro-Light.otfTrajanSansPro-Regular.otfTrajanSansPro-Semibold.otfTrajanSansPro-Bold.otfTrajanSansPro-Black.otfMyriadArabic-Light.otfMyriadArabic-LightIt.otfMyriadArabic-Regular.otfMyriadArabic-Italic.otfMyriadArabic-Semibold.otfMyriadArabic-SemiboldIt.otfMyriadArabic-Bold.otfMyriadArabic-BoldIt.otfMyriadArabic-Black.otfMyriadArabic-BlackIt.otfAdobeDevanagari-Regular.otfAdobeDevanagari-Italic.otfAdobeDevanagari-Bold.otfAdobeDevanagari-BoldItalic.otfMyriadHebrew-Light.otfMyriadHebrew-LightIt.otfMyriadHebrew-LightItAlt.otfMyriadHebrew-Regular.otfMyriadHebrew-It.otfMyriadHebrew-ItAlt.otfMyriadHebrew-Semibold.otfMyriadHebrew-SemiboldIt.otfMyriadHebrew-SemiboldItAlt.otfMyriadHebrew-Bold.otfMyriadHebrew-BoldIt.otfMyriadHebrew-BoldItAlt.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-Light.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-LightIt.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-Regular.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-It.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-Semibold.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-SemiboldIt.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-Light.otfMyriadHebrewCursive-BoldIt.otfKazurakiSP2NLight.otfRyoDispPlusN-Medium.otfRyoDispPlusN-Semibold.otfRyoDispPlusN-Bold.otfRyoDispPlusN-ExtraBold.otfRyoDispPlusN-Heavy.otf
    I suppose one answer is just "upgrade and find out." Looking at the case of Utopia, can I assume that the latest version from UtopiaStdReadMe.html is available? For instance, it reads:
        The following faces have version 2.096:
         UtopiaStd-BlackHeadline created Fri Dec 17 18:01:27 2010.     UtopiaStd-BoldCapt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:28 2010.     UtopiaStd-BoldCaptIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:28 2010.     UtopiaStd-BoldDisp created Fri Dec 17 18:01:28 2010.
         UtopiaStd-BoldDispIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:28 2010.     UtopiaStd-BoldSubh created Fri Dec 17 18:01:29 2010.     UtopiaStd-BoldSubhIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:29 2010.     UtopiaStd-Capt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:30 2010.     UtopiaStd-CaptIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:30 2010.     UtopiaStd-Disp created Fri Dec 17 18:01:30 2010.
         UtopiaStd-DispIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:31 2010.     UtopiaStd-SemiboldCapt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:32 2010.     UtopiaStd-SemiboldCaptIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:32 2010.     UtopiaStd-SemiboldDisp created Fri Dec 17 18:01:32 2010.     UtopiaStd-SemiboldDispIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:33 2010.     UtopiaStd-SemiboldSubh created Fri Dec 17 18:01:33 2010.
         UtopiaStd-SemiboldSubhIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:34 2010.     UtopiaStd-Subh created Fri Dec 17 18:01:34 2010.     UtopiaStd-SubhIt created Fri Dec 17 18:01:34 2010.
    The following faces have version 2.097:
         UtopiaStd-Bold created Wed Mar 16 14:24:26 2011.     UtopiaStd-Bold created Wed Mar 16 14:24:26 2011.
         UtopiaStd-BoldIt created Wed Mar 16 14:24:24 2011.     UtopiaStd-BoldIt created Wed Mar 16 14:24:24 2011.     UtopiaStd-Italic created Wed Mar 16 14:24:25 2011.     UtopiaStd-Italic created Wed Mar 16 14:24:25 2011.     UtopiaStd-Regular created Wed Mar 16 14:24:26 2011.     UtopiaStd-Regular created Wed Mar 16 14:24:26 2011.
         UtopiaStd-Semibold created Wed Mar 16 14:24:27 2011.     UtopiaStd-Semibold created Wed Mar 16 14:24:27 2011.     UtopiaStd-SemiboldIt created Wed Mar 16 14:24:25 2011.     UtopiaStd-SemiboldIt created Wed Mar 16 14:24:25 2011.
    version 2.097 created 2011/03/16
         Utopia Std
         Utopia Std
    version 2.096 created 2010/12/17
         Added code at end of name ID 3 'Unique Name' to indicate licensing foundry.
         Remove deprecated ForceBold keyword from CFF table.
         Update OS/2 table to version 4: add WPF names name ID 21 and 22 to name table, if needed.
    version 2.076 created 2009/11/23
         Corrected font menu names in name table for Mac platform names. Name
         ID's 1,2 16 and 17 are now written following the same rules as the
         Windows platform names. Previous releases put the Preferred Name
         and Style in Mac platform name ID 1 and 2, and did not write name ID
         16 and 17, for legacy issues with old Mac OS versions.
    version 2.066 created 2009/08/11
         Added Windows platform name ID 8- Manufacturer.
    version 2.050 created 2007/08/16
         Release for FontFolio 11... [actually a lot of bullets here!] 
    So can I assume FF11.1 will have Utopia 2.097? I can't really see anything in the above that looks like a user-visible change of significance...
    On the other hand, FF11.1 upgrades seem to be extremely reasonably priced.  List price of the upgrade is $29.95/seat (20-pack), so really that's chump-change. So I suppose I can't really go wrong. But it's hard to get excited about, especially when I already have Adobe Text and Hypatia Pro from giveaway incentives (though I guess having them in FF clarifies some potentially thorny licensing questions...)
    Thanks!

    Err, so I thought this would be an easy question...not so?

  • Using Font Folio in InDesign to export in PDF to app store

    Our customer is creating applications using In Design.    These applications are exported into PDF format for viewing on mobile devices.    Is there any additional licensing needed from Adobe in this scenario?
    Also, in the future (not now) if the customer would like to look into perhaps fonts to be embedded in a app the customer is creating, what licensing would be needed?
    Thanks in advance!

    For export of PDF from InDesign (or saving PDF from Illustrator or Photoshop), no additional license is required for embedding fonts sourced from Adobe (including all the fonts in the Font Folio and any bundled with Adobe applications).
    This is not true for use in applications where text is being generated on-the-fly and/or can be entered by the user. Others will comment on those licensing requirements.
              - Dov

  • Can't burn optical disks

    is there a problem in 10.5 with burning optical disks from Disk Utility? I just wasted 4 disks and this never happened before. The burned disks are unmountable, they just keep trying to be read.

    barbaraok wrote:
    Why is this marked solved? I didn't see a solution.
    It was certainly answered by the OP
    Gnarlodious wrote:
    "It turns out that the size of the diskimage I was burning was slightly too large to fit on the disk. You would think Disk Utility would catch the problem instead of wasting my time and a disk... "
    When a thread is hijacked (which is rude) only the OP can mark the thread solved. Those with a similar problem should not break in with their own problem, but post a new thread. This is the way forums work - it is not my rule.
    Not all problems have the same solution as is obvious here.

  • Lion, Font Book & Adobe Font Folio

    Howdy All,
    I have a brand new Mac mini with Lion installed (of course) and I'm having a bear of a time loading the Adobe Font Folio. In general, I'm having a really hard time with Font Book on other Lion, late vintage, machines. I've tried every counter measure in my bag of tricks: boot in safe mode, Onyx cleaning, new user accounts, deleting plists, etc. At first I ignored the Font Book warnings, then I've heeded every one and not loaded the fonts. On my latest attempt, with a new user account account I have 444 fonts loaded, with the vast majority turned off, but Font Book hangs. I suppose I can always flatten the machine and start from scratch, but I'm just wondering if someone has an insight into the Lion/Font Book situation that I don't have. For the record, I have about 600 fonts running on about 30 Snow Leopard machines without any drama.
    Thanks in advance for ideas.

    Same here. My thread: https://discussions.apple.com/message/15995212#15995212
    I've had no replies. Have you looked at Activity Monitor while this is happening? check it out. I think i'm just going to go back to Leopard, don't know what else to do. Do you have an SSD in there?

Maybe you are looking for