For (final Type Identifier : Expression)

The docs/enhanced-for.html file in EA 2.4 change log says that one change in the foreach statement was:
Added provision for declaring the "element variable" to be final.
This was done by changing the syntax from:
for "(" Type Identifier : Expression ")" Statement
to:
for "(" FormalParameter : Expression ")" Statement
This naturally allows final (and annotation as well, for those of you tracking JSR-175).When I brought this up with fredastaire he pointed out that the latter production would allow for (Object... a : new Object[5][4]);which is not actually permitted by the 1.5 beta. Can anyone clarify the situation?

Look at the varargs spec again - there is a difference between FormalParameter and LastFormalParameter.Thanks. Yes, doc/varargs.html disagrees with the comments in Parser.java.
    /** FormalParameter = { FINAL | '@' Annotation } Type VariableDeclaratorId
     *               | { FINAL | '@' Annotation } Type "..." Ident
     */

Similar Messages

Is the 200GB 4200-rpm HDD fast enough to use for Final Cut HD Express?

Just saw the option of having a 200 gb HDD on the MBP
Is this fast enough to work with HD files?
Thanks
Jerry

Of course it is. It will mean slower speeds but a consistent factor (4200 divided by 5400) at most. I tend to tell people if they need extremely powerful video processing software to skip the macbook and get a mac pro. Anything thats going to take an extremely long amount of time on a 5400 isn't going to take all that much longer with 4200 (in fact once loaded into memory, its virtually the same).
So yes it is fast enough but a Mac Pro is even better for high performance video work.

My HD died on my iMac. I replaced it and lost everything that was on it. I found my source disks from my original purchase for Final Cut Express HD 3.5. I now have Maverick ISO and it will not let me load my software so I can continue my film work. ???

My HD died on my iMac. I replaced it and lost everything that was on it. I found my source disks from my original purchase for Final Cut Express HD 3.5. I now have Maverick ISO and it will not let me load my software so I can continue my film work. How do I get it too recover it without paying for it again since I paid for it already and have projects in progress that need to be completed?

1) Partition your hard drive or add an external drive and install Snow Leopard (with the Optional Rosetta) into it and then you can dual-boot (System Preferences:Startup Disk) into Snow Leopard and run FCE 3.5 there.
2) Use one of the following methods to install FCE 3.5 into Mavericks:
a) Pacifist: http://www.charlessoft.com/
b) Jeremy Johnstone's Terminal method: http://www.jeremyjohnstone.com/blog/2012-03-11-installing-final-cut-pro-studio-2 -0-on-mac-os-x-10-7-lion.html
Reports on this forum seem to confirm that Final Cut Studio 2 will continue to operate in Mavericks once it is functionally installed, albeit some plug-ins may fail to function. FCE 3.5 is the same generation as FCS2, and presumably will continue to operate in Mavericks, as well.

Is the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS worth the money for Final Cut Express?

Hi,
I'm considering a new iMac 24, but not sure if the speedier on is worth the money.
Currently I use a MacBook Pro 2.2 for Final Cut Express with a 23" cinema (mostly DV, some HD) and that works okay, but won't play back in real time when I composit video.
Anybody know if the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS will help in that area?
Thanks,
KC

The speedier video card is great for 3D stuff, but it won't matter a wink for Final Cut Express, which barely makes use of the video card.
Keep in mind that Final Cut is using the CPU, not video card, to perform the editing, decoding, and encoding of the video. The only time the video card comes into play is during playback of the video, and any of the video options available for iMacs will handle that just fine.
When you composite video, the hard-disk throughput will start to come into play. The dinky 5400 RPM disk in your laptop will adversely affect the performance of that.

Midnight Openings for Final Fantasy Type 0

Are there Midnight Openings for Final Fantasy Type 0? There is nothing on the Event page.

Hello there Rachel181-
I apologize that we are getting to this after the fact, but obviously as you’ve probably seen, we did not hold any midnight events for this title or others this week.
Generally if we are going to have a midnight release for a title, we will have an announcement on our Gaming Events page found here.
Thanks for posting!
Bill|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Good substitute for Final Cut Express?

I tried a free month of Final Cut Express over a year ago. When done I found that the version I got If I bought was a newer version. I presume the two versions involved were 3.5 and 4.0. So I must have tried 3.5.
I liked it a lot! It would have been $200 as I recall. Now I find that It's no longer available. It had all the function I want and I cannot afford to pay for Final Cut Pro considering the relatively small amount of "work" I intend to do with it. I've since upgraded to Mountain Lion and it appears I cannot run Final Cut Express on this system. Plus, my iMac is mid 2010 with 4gb memory.
Is there some app out there that can do what FCE did?
One function in particular was very useful to me as a musician -- being able to stretch the audio from my Zoom recorder to match the audio/video from my camcorder.
Thanks for the help.

Hello David
Quick question which may be helpful for Bruce:
I'm familiar with the controversy over the original release of FCX. There was great disatisfaction and disappointment because the first release appeared to be more of a glorified iMovie. Many professional features were replaced with templates creating a 'dumbed down' platform, (nothing like FCP).
Many FC Pro users were outraged. Many abandoned FC, and went with Avid.
Is it true Apple admitted to a 'flawed design' with X, and put back a lot of Pro features that were missing?
Thanx
Mike

Transferring footage from Sony V1U to Final Pro Cut Express...HELP!!

Hi Guys,
I have been trying to transfer my footage from my V1U to my IMAC for days and am getting no where. At first I thought it was because Imovie didn't work with my V1U. So I went out and bought Final Pro Cut express today. I still CAN'T transfer my footage.
BTW, I am using a firewire 800 and my MAC is only a week old.
Does anyone have any advice on how to do this? I am about to pull my hair out.
Thanks!

Hi(Bonjour)!
HDV is not captured like DV.
It's a must to use the correct setup in easy setup dialog to fit your shooted material on tape.
Here's the trail to follow if you want to edit in HD (by the way I use a SONY FX1 that can shoot in HD mode or standard definition DV- mode: wide or standard screen).
On my FX1
-find the camera menu and set the recording format to HDV (it sould be 1080i60 as it's the HDV format used by this model).
-Set the output format to automatic or 1080i60 (this is the type of signal that will be outputed by your camcorder upon capture via firewire).
-turn off you camcorder and mac.
-Plug both devices with a firewire cable.
-turn on the FX1 AND the mac.
-Start FCE HD
In Final Cut Express HD
-Use "Easy Setup..." command in Final Cut express menu , select HD in format tab, 29.97 in rate tab and HDV-Apple Intermediate Codec 1080i60. Click "Setup" button.
-From this point, any new sequences and capture session will occur in Apple Intermediate Codec 1080i60 (the format used to edit in HDV).
-Use command-8 to open the capture window. HDV is captured via a simple dialog. There are no capture settings or log clips info.
-Start your camcorder in *VCR mode*(the play button on camcorder or on remote) and click the capture now button into FCE HD.
NOTES: there is no sound from your MAC upon capturing. There is a lag time between what is played on your cam and what you can see on your mac screen, so use the camcorder screen to monitor the content.
-Hit the "ESC" key when you want to stop the capturing process.
Once the esc key is pressed, your mac will continue to process the captured material and the capture window should close.
That's the way to capture HDV material into FCE HD.
Michel Boissonneault

Sending Material for Final packaging.

Dear Experts,
Greetings of the day!
Scenario:
At times we have some finished products, which we need to send to a vendor for making promotion packs- In simple terms, suppose we have finished material - A, B and C, and we want to get all together shrink wrapped. (3 in 1).
No. of Promotional Packs: 100, each containing (materials A,B &C in the ratio of 1:1:1)
Material
Quantity
Batch
A
100
100001
B
100
100002
C
100
100003
Batch management is active.
Process AS-IS:
1.Create Purchase request (MB51N); with item category -L
2.Create Purchase order (ME21N);
3.Issue material against purchase order by 541 Movement;
4.Create inbound delivery against Purchase order;
5.Receive material By MIGO, with movement type 107;
6.Release GR Blocked Stock by MIGO with movement type 109;
7.Create TO against material document generated from 109 Movement.
8.Confirmation of TO for final put-away to respective storage bins.
Problems:
1. When we receive partial quantities from the vendor, we can make GRN (107) against the inbound delivery for the partial quantity by changing the quantity in the inbound delivery number; but we are not able to release GRN (109) as it is showing an error , which asks for complete receipt needs to be done.
2. I have reversed 107, by doing 108, and then if I am trying to make GRN against the same inbound delivery by movement type 107, the system reflects an error as " Delivery note data already Exits".
Scenerio II: Promotion Packs : 100, each containing materials (A,A & A in the ratios of 1:1:1)-Pack of Three (Same Material)
Material
Quantity
Batch
A
100
100004
A
100
100005
A
100
100006
Purchase request looks like : (B'coz at the time of making purchase request we don't know which batch will be picked by the system)
Material
Quantity
A
300
Similarly Purchase order will look same, as it has been created from the PR, and inbound delivery number also same (Only one line item).
Problems:
1. At the time of GRN (107), how can we split the material into different batches, since we want to receive with the same batch.
Hope the scenario's are clear!
Regards,
Malik Abrar Altaf.

Hi,
So many issues are identified when using two step procedure with inbound delivery. The notes 1373027 - Problems w/ 2-step goods receipts using inbound deliveries and 1225077 - GR with inbound deliveries in (valuated) GR blocked stock explains the same.
If you have different batch numbers for GR, then you have to split to different line items with respect to batch.
Regards,
AKPT

A realistic assessment of your experiences of hardware needed for the type of editing I do please.

Introduction:
I apologise for the length of this post but from experience of reading here, I'm working on the principle of the more I explain about myself now, the less anyone willing to help me will have to ask later.
I have lurked around this forum on and off for a few years, read the various threads in the FAQ section, particularly PPBM5 and What PC to build thread and other related topics around what system to build. I have found them very useful and in particular have enjoyed reading about Harm Millaard's experiences First Ideas for a new system. For about about 12 months I've been delaying upgrading my PC but in Mr Millard's latest updates on his PPBM6 site he talks about new systems and provides a link to Intel's time line which suggests they are in no rush to replace the i739xx series CPU chip - which has I believe amongst other things 2 cores disabled. Normally bitter experience has taught me not to rush out and buy the latest technology but let others "test" it first and then benefit from reduced prices as that model is replaced. However, it now seems like last years technology is going to remain as this years technology and probably the first 2 quarters at least of next year and, if anything, the price of the i739xx series is at best staying at it's existing launch price or even rising. So it's time to take the plunge for me and upgrade.
My current hardware for editing:
I started with Premier 6.5 after I bought it as part of a bundle with a Matrox RTX 10 card - one of the most temperamental pieces of hardware I've had the misfortune to work with. I later upgraded to Premiere Pro 1.5 and edited with that using a Pentium 4 2.6 (overclocked to 3.2), 3 hard drives (no raid) and 4G of memory. The video footage used was avi recorded using a Canon MVX 30i and Panasonic NVGS27 and now I've added the Casio Exilim EX -FC100 (mpeg format) and a Panasonic HDC S90 (AVCHD).
My PC coped with the editing I did with avi footage but couldn't handle AVCHD format and this convinced me to upgrade to Premiere Pro CS5.5. At the same time I switched to editing on a Dell XPS M1530 (Centrino duo chip) - I upped the memory to 4GB, put Windows 7 64 bit home edition on and replaced the existing hard drive with a faster one. In addition I use a SATA Quickport duo attached to my laptop via an eSATA card. However, either the Quickport, eSATA card or XPS is extremely temperamental - I never see two external hard drives, 50% of the time see 1 external drive or none at all - when that happens I edit around it doing things I can with just the one internal drive - but this problem is not my question.
The type of editing i do:
I know people usually say around here not to try editing on laptops and believe me, I understand why, but using this setup I have been able to edit lots of videos - see here for examples of the type of editing I currently do:
http://www.youtube.com/user/PathfinderPro
The equipment test videos place the biggest strain on the hardware when editing. And, to do this editing I have to convert my AVCHD footage in to it's YouTube format before editing and even after I've done that it can be tediously slow to edit and playback even with premiere set to play at 1/4 normal quality. To convert the AVCHD footage to the YouTube format I edit in has to be done over many nights.
Now I am not a professional, I typically edit with up to 4 tracks of video with additional tracks for titles and my target audience is YouTube - which is why I can get away without editing in my prefered option of native AVCHD video format. However, I'm tired of all the waiting, stuttering, and many many days and hours of converting videos into a format I can use so I'm looking to upgrade. My problem is though I'm uncertain what path to take. The PPBM results are dominated by overclocked chips, and whilst the motherboard make and model is listed, the hard disks used, graphic card makes and models and memory modules are not. This is not a criticism of the PPMB tables (big thank you to Bill Gehrke & Harm Millaard for taking the time and effort to pull this much information together) but for me, I am not interested in being in the top 1000 in the world, nor overclocking like mad, and having had horror experiences of using matrox products and compatibility and stability issues with other hardware I'm more interested in compatability and practicality than speed when deciding what to build. I've also read the threads about marvel controllers, dual and quad channel memory support, the pro's and cons of SSD or standard drives, raid setups, the heat problems with overclocking the newer ivy bridge chips and general build advice etc so I'm not coming here without having done some reading first.
The type of system I'm thinking of:
So far based on what I've read here, I've come to the conclusion - but I'm open to suggestion:
- Chip - regrettably due to the cost and unlikely successor anytime soon - a 39xx (with appropriate cooler) because I want to edit in native AVCHD which seems to require the warrior type chip as opposed to the "economical" build regardless of what my target audience is and this suggests
- X79 motherboard (which must have an old PCI slot such as the Asus Sabertooth and which has room for the cooler I'm considering). As I will be carrying over my old terretec DMX 6 fire 24/96 soundcard - all my videos have their audio mastered in Audition using this card - best piece of advice I read was the audience will watch a bad video with good sound editing but not the other way round)
- 4 hard drives plus additional hard drive for operating system using onboard raid controllers (not sure whether the operating system drive will be WD caviar black or SSD and can't justify cost of external raid controller for either my type of use or number of hard drives being used)
- Video card - I can now buy a GTX 580 for less than the 670 - so not sure on the card especially based on Harm Millards observations that memory bandwith seems to be as important as CUDA cores
- Case - I have an Akasa 62 case with room for 5 hard drives - I won't be exceeding that, and if I overclock it will only be by a little so is it really necessary to replace it for a Tower Case - although I would prefer a case with a front connection for esata so I may have to change the case regardless
- Maximum memory 32G - so is it necessary to upgrade to windows 7 professional?
- Power source - I'll work out when I've decided on my components.
Help please:
For me it's video source/dictated software chosen and hardware/audience(youtube) dictates format edited in. As I don't intend to change my camcorders format (AVCHD or mpeg) in the next couple of years and I'm not interested in having the "fastest" system around what I'm really interested in learning is:
what system setups people use now for doing similar editing to me
what make/models of the component parts in your system work well together
and if you do have a bottle neck in terms of hardware, where is it and what hardware would you change to (not a dream model change, just a practical and realistic one)
I have deliberately not given a budget for the changes I'm intending because budget should not be the deciding factor in determining what I "need" to upgrade to for the "type of editing I do" - especially bearing in mind I've got by so far (admitedly at a tortoise pace) with by todays standards a standard spec laptop. Basically I don't want a Rolls Royce to go shopping at Wallmart but I'm tired of walking there and carrying everything back by hand!
Thank you very much for any help / experiences people can share.

Thank you both for your prompt and helpful replies.
Mr Millaard, regarding your excellent article Planning and Building an NLE system, I have read it a couple of times now and it was your article which finally convinced me the time was now to upgrade but within it you said for good reason "Initial choice of CPU: i7-39xx with the intention to overclock to 4.6 - 4.8 GHz", hence my uncertainty about the CPU to use. I have seen a video you posted here - I think it was based on your cats (which I incidently enjoyed) so working on the editing done there (but not remembering if you mentioned what video format you used) and others who have mentioned many pro's for the i7-39xx I was leaning towards that - but I'm financially relieved at least - if the i3770 will do, although now with the possible recommendation by JEShort01 (sorry not sure of the forum etiquette for use of names) of the 2600K overclocked I'm a little bit back in the position of which is more suitable especially with the update to the i3770 being nearer than i7-39xx. This still makes me lean towards the i7-39xx.
Regarding the editing, the match play you can see on the channel is indeed 1 camera basic edits - multiple titles used to provide the score board. However, the coaching videos use mulitple cameras - 3 to 4 sometimes (another reason for upgrading to CS5.5 for the multi cam editing support) and the equipment testing video can use 3 or 4 tracks layered on top of each other other with each track having opacity settings and multiple motion effects and titles with occasional keying video effects added. For example this video at approx 2 mins 50 and 5 mins 10 seconds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1E5T7xo57c&list=PL577F7AB5E31FC5E9&index=13&feature=plpp_v ideo
Monitor wise I use dual monitor setup. My laptop screen and I link out to an LG M2394 D for widescreen and I sometimes use an old Neovo F-419 for 3 / 4 editing. I won't be using more monitors than 2. If the 580 drops a bit more I'll probably go for that - although I'll have to make sure it's size isn't an issue for the motherboard combo setup. Interestingly there is a thread shown on the forum home page which discusses the 570 vs the 660ti and the opinion was go with the 660ti which surprised me a bit.
Windows 7 professional it is then - I should have known that too - apologises for asking a question already asked.
"Accepted, your correct criticism of the lacking hardware info on the PPBM5 website. That is the overriding reason that for the new site http://ppbm7.com/ we want to use Piriform Speccy .xml results to gather more, more accurate and more detailed hardware info."
No criticism intended Mr Millaard - more an observation and I really look forward to that evolution with PPBM7. I'm assuming the .xml results will use pre populated drop down lists people can select their hardware from - that way you can control and ensure consistent entries - downside being the work required by you to populate the lists in the first place and maintain them.
Thanks again for your help but I'm still unsure a bit about the CPU and video card though.

In the report builder 6i when I choose the query type as Express Query .....

In the report builder 6i when I choose the query type as Express Query and go to next step where on pressing the connect button I am getting the following error.
REP-6029 : Express error.
How can I solve this problem ?
Thanks
Nanda Kishore

DiId you download Oracle Reports Developer/Server Release 6i for Express, Files for Oracle8i for Windows NT from OTN?
If so, could you provide me wih more information?
Thanks
Elaine

Value to be entered for Version type while populating metadata into Plannin

Hi
I have extracted the version dimension from my outline.
Now i need to push it into Planning 11. I have reversed the planning dimension 7 using the version dimension to push value.
After extract, the version type comes under UDA as "Standard bottom up, Public". I split the string into 2 columns as version type & other as UDA.
I mapped the version type column at source to version type (in planning) at target.
On executing the interface, it generated the following error log:
Final Version,Version,,Never Share,,,,Public,Standard Bottom Up,~,Cannot load dimension member, error message is: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid value for field Version Type: Standard Bottom Up.
REV 1,Version,,Never Share,,Release 1,,Public,Standard Bottom Up,~,Cannot load dimension member, error message is: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid value for field Version Type: Standard Bottom Up
What value should be entered for version type??
Moreover if there is any doc/pdf which provide details about the different values that can go into Planning dimensions, please share.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: user8628169 on Jan 18, 2010 4:40 PM

Hi,
The value should be "Bottom Up" or "Target", have a read here for the properties
Ok?
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Cannot change shift due date in Repayment Structure for Final Repayment

Hi Expert,
For creating new transaction of product type 'Interest Rate Instrument' , In Repayment Structure for Flow type - Final Repayment I want to change working day from the default in "No Shift" to "Next working day" but the screen display in gray color.
In this case i have not been post any flow types to G/L account.
Do you have any ideas or the correct solution to solve my issue?
Thank you in advance,
PK
Edited by: Pleassure on Feb 23, 2012 10:32 AM

Hi,
This is becuase you have settled the instrument. Please reverse the settlement , the required filed will be available for change.
Brijendra

Field selection for movement type 601 account 894025 differs for cutomer

While posting goods after saving delivery merror message
Field selection for movement type 601/aact 894025 differs for customer goods movement
I tried OMJJ>Mvtmt Type>601>Field selection enjoy>601 KONTO Optional field
Now this is only happening in the cases where I have assigned free goods Inclusive 10MT. If the order is less than 10MT (that is if no free goods attached) posting is accepted & billing & account determination is processed successfully.
I am unable to identify the reason though I have worked a lot on MM/Fico on the system.
Please provide your valued inputs why this is happening?
Thanks for your time.
Rajiv

Hi Raja,
Thanks for prompt reply.
I shall appreciate if you elaborate how to check
check the Field selection goup in control tab for that GL
I tried OBC$--> (Is this correct?)
I checked cost center field G004 -->Addl Act assignemtn -->Cost center which is Optional entry. Should I check any other items on the screen as I am unable to understand which field is applicable on a/c field.
Profit center, cost object are in G004 as supressed field.
So should I make optional? So thing will work.
Other Q should I also consider G025 Inventory adjustment account? As per error this a/c is not shown. So pl advise me steps or heading which I should consider.
Thanks for yr time.
Rajiv

What is the IDOC for Final Approval of PO

Hi,
Can any one tell me ..
1. what is the IDOC for Final Approval of Purchase Order?
2. Is there any Separate IDOCs for GRN(Goods Receipts
Note) in Transaction MIGO. Like Creation of GRN,
Changing of GRN, Cancelling of GRN, Transfering materials to Scrap or Cost center (Changing of Movement types in MIGO).
regards,
Khaja.

Khaja,
1. There is no separate IDOC for final approval of a PO. IF you have configured a release stratgey for a PO, the PO IDOC will be transmitted only upon the final apporval of the PO.
2. Yes there should be a IDOC for Goods Receipt.
Regards,
Ravi
Note : Please mark the helpful answers

Logical System Name is defined for which type of Business Sytem

hi
Can some one helps me on this question and explaination.
Logical System Name is defined for which type of Business Sytem ?
a.Third Party
b.Web AS java
c.WebAs abap
d.Standalone java
Thanks
Chandra

Hi ,
Logical System Name is defined for the Business System type WebAS ABAP.
It is used in ALE scenarios when exchanging IDOCs between the particular system and XI. The IDOC adapter will pick up the information from the SLD and it can then be used in the configuration in the Communication Channel (Adapter Specific Identifiers).
Refer to this How-To Guide for more info
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c09b775e-e56e-2910-1187-d8eba09c7a4a
Regards
Manish

For (final Type Identifier : Expression)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for