For PO output conditon, Could add po item level field as field catagory?

Hi experts
Now we need setup reuturn PO, use item return flag .if we create new output type for return po, How could we setup the ouptut condition? In current conditon, there is no return po flag field.
Where we could extend this field ? for such po item field, it could be added or not ?
Thanks
Alice

Hi
Thanks a lot for your help. if we craete new document type for return PO, It will be big works, we have po document type for each Region. one more docuemnt type will make more work and confuse for users .
Like Contract / cost assignment PO, it only give the po item flag.which use same output to print the PO?
Does sap have the same function?
Thanks
ALice

Similar Messages

How to create a new field for Q3 - QM notification in Header and item level

Dear All,
l
Sub: How to create a new field for Q3 - QM notification in Header and item level
Ref. the link --> Quality Notification
We want to create a new field in header level and item level.
As per the thread the solution is given below.
In the IMG Config: Quality Management -> Quality Notification -> Notification Types -> Define screen areas for notification types Then Choose 'Define screen areas' Then Click on 'New entries' button Now, select the relevant Notification Type and click in 'Enter'. Select the 'Iten Cases' register and remember to setup the Tabstrip Header, Icon, etc. Set the 'Tabstrip active' flag. Then Save.
Quality Notification -> Notification Types -> Define screen areas for notification types
WE ARE UNABLE TO FIND IN CUSTOMIZATION PATH --> DEFINE SCREEN AREAS FOR NOTIFICATION TYPES.
Please help.
Question No. 2 :
THE REQUIREMENT IS GIVEN BELOW.
We want to hide the field in Q3 - QM Notification
In header --> Reference tab --> Item (sub heading) --> "DEFECT LOCATION" FIELD TO BE ELIMINATED (HIDE)
Ref the link --> Quality notification
The solutiion is given below.
Hi Sami,
We can hide the collumns using the Transaction OQM1 and Program Name SAPLIQS0.
Lets say Defect location need to be hidden, the field TXTCDOT need to have the radio button HIDE.
Hope this will suffice your requirement.
Kindly ask me if you need any other details.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas.D
Hi Sami,
We can hide the collumns using the Transaction OQM1 and Program Name SAPLIQS0.
Lets say Defect location need to be hidden, the field TXTCDOT need to have the radio button HIDE.
Hope this will suffice your requirement.
Kindly ask me if you need any other details.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas.D
By double clicking the "DEFECTIVE QUANTITY (EXTERNAL), WE COULD NOT GET --> field TXTCDOT .
Plese do the needful.
We are using ECC6.0 Ehp3 and Ehp4.
With Best Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Dear Pushpa,
Transaction Code :SHD0 is working fine.
Please accept my sincere thanks for your sharing your Knowledge.
I am able to fulfill my
Regarding the enhancement, I have not tried.
Once I will complete, I will award the fulll marks to you.
With Best Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Display of Item Level Fields in Complaint Search Result

Hi,
We have enhanced the complaint search result screen to display columns such as item category or code group. These values come from the item level, so the result list displays blanks under these columns. Is it possible to populate these fields? Something like, displaying multiple rows for the same complaint, with different values for item level fields in each row?
For example, there is a complaint with 3 items. The user searches for complaints based on some header field, and this complaint is in the result list. Is it possible to display 3 different rows for the same complaint, with the value for Item Category being different for the 3 rows?

Hi,
Yes, this is possible but it a custom development.
We had similar requirement where we needed to search all searvice orders and complaints belonging to an item category.
We created a Z-search component for this and implemented the logic .
If the complaint search component has item category as a search parameter ( i am not sure) then it will be simple...but it is doesnt have it, then u can include it programatically or using AET ( if you are on 7.0) .
The result population will be programatic as you will have to search complaints matching to your item category.
There are large no of item categories per transaction type, so dynamic search takes too much time and times out on web ui..You must supply atleas one valid item category as the basis for your search.
Thanks & regards,
Suchita

Screen BADI for MIRO/FB60 item level field addition

Hi,
I need to add 'Material Group" (MATKL) field in item level similar GL Account. Material group will appear like GL account column in FB60/ MIRO screen ( GL posting).
I want to do without modification with help screen BADI.
Anyone, can suggest which BADI's method / User Exit can allow to add 'MATKL' field screen?
regards,
Rahul Mandale

Dear Rahul,
Please check IMG path :
Material management>Logistic Invoice verification>incoming invoice-->Maintain item list variant.
Or use Tcode SHD0, enter transaction Code MIRO and create a screen variant.
You can create your own screen variant , Untick the invisible check box for material group.
Regards,
w1n

Search help for Custom Item level field

Hi All,
I have two custom fields at Item level. Both of them has fixed values defined at domain. The fixed values have a short text also given with them.
The problem I am facing is when SRM provides default search help for these custom fields, for first field the 'Value' and 'Description' comes in the search result screen, but for second, only 'Value' comes in the search result.
When I try to debug, it shows the SHLPTYPE as 'SH' for first one and for the second as 'FV'.
What does this indicate?
My requirement is to display both value and description in the search result screen.
Please suggest.
Thanks
Nandalal

Hi
Sorry for the delay. My User got locked for some time.
I have seen the document you sent me on my email id.
 I noticed in the case where the Search help is working fine, there is no space in between the contents of the Fixed values and their short text under the value range tab of the Domain element.
But in the case, where there is a problem with the search help. There both the Fixed values and their short description is having a space in between the words.
Try maintaining COND_A instead of "COND A". Also with the short description use "COND_A" instead of "COND A".
I hope this will resolve the issue.
Update me once you have any issues.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

How to make a mass change for incoterms of a scheduling agreement at item level.

Hi SAP Guru,
There are many wrongly assigned incoterms in the scheduling agreement at item level by a user exit which was implemented recently in production. May i know if there is any way that we can revert those changes back to the original incoterms via mass change? I've tried to search over the internet and it seems like there is no posting about this issue before. Please help urgently. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shawn

You can use the following sample to develop your usecase.
Here, we would show menu items only for the nodes at level 3.
You can also download the entire sample based on POJO at
http://adfsampleapplications.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/TreeSampleApplication.zip
The code is self explanatory.
Let know, if you have any specific questions.
<af:form id="f1">
<af:treeTable value="#{bindings.continents.treeModel}" var="node"
selectionListener="#{bindings.continents.treeModel.makeCurrent}"
rowSelection="single" id="tt1" columnStretching="last">
<f:facet name="nodeStamp">
<af:column id="c1">
<af:outputText value="#{node}" id="ot2"/>
</af:column>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="pathStamp">
<af:outputText value="#{node}" id="ot1"/>
</f:facet>
*<f:facet name="contextMenu">*
*<af:popup id="p1" contentDelivery="lazyUncached">*
*<af:setPropertyListener from="#{bindings.continents.treeModel.depth}"*
*to="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth}"*
*type="popupFetch"/>*
*<af:menu text="menu 1" id="m2">*
*<af:commandMenuItem text="View Districts" id="cmi1"*
*visible="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth == 2 ? true : false}"/>*
*<af:commandMenuItem text="View Attractions" id="cmi2"*
*visible="#{pageFlowScope.CurrentDepth == 2 ? true : false}"/>*
*</af:menu>*
*</af:popup>*
*</f:facet>*
</af:treeTable>
</af:form>
Thanks,
Navaneeth

EDI invoice failed for Service- multiple tax code at service item level

Hi Guys,
Please understand below scenarios, it is very critical to our client.
purchase order has 3 parent
line item which having the 3 services with tax code (P1-P1-P1 and P2-P2-P2 and (P2-P1-C1)
(P1=10%, P2=10% and C1=10%)
PO Outbound Idoc -
Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount and
tax rate at parent level also it carries indvidual service line item
tax amount and tax rate at service item level
Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
SES Outbound Idoc -
Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount at
parent level segment and tax rate at parent item level also it carries
indvidual service line item tax amount and tax rate at service item
level
Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
But while creating the invoice for parent line item which includes 3
services, it carries correct tax amount(as per PO and SESR) but it is
asking for tax rate at parent level not at service item level.
It is working fine for similar tax code at service line item (e.g P1-P1-p1 for 3 services or P2-P2-P2 for all 3 services) but when we use the combination of tax code or multiple tax code at service line items (e.g. P2-P1-C1), the inbound Idoc gets failed.
Expectation - How EDI invoice posted for mulitple Services under one parent line item which having multiple tax codes at service item level
Thanks
Sanjay
9930851236

This is an ongoing problem with lots of clients - did anyone solve it ?

Adding item level field to field catalog for a PPF for Outbound Delivery

Hi,
We wish to send a method call to an external system at the time of PGI of the Outbound Delivery Order for the combination of Product/Ship To combination.
Since Product is at item level and not in the standard field catalog, I added it to the field catalog in config, defined a new condition table, access sequence, condition type and maintained it in the right Procedure/Maintenance Group (Outbound Delivery).
Then I defined a new Action Definition, with a new method to send the details to the external system, but am confused on what Schedule Condition I should assign to this Action Definition. If I use standard Outbound Delivery Printing Schedule Condition /SCWM/FDO_PRINT, the PPF only triggers when I use the standard condition type 0DDN with the standard Access Sequence (no Product available). However if I use the new condition type (with product) with the same Schedule condition: /SCWM/FDO_PRINT, the PPF does not get triggered. The log in SLG1 simply says Condition is not fulfilled.
Can you please suggest
Do I need to work with my developer on building a new schedule condition which would look at the new condition technique I have condition records for? Or is there a non ABAP way of making this work?
Lastly, if my ODO has 5 items with only 2 products which have condition record, I want the PPF to be triggered 2 times for that Outbound Delivery.

Hi Experts,
Any update on the above request?

SRM 7.0 item level field in PO screen

Hi all,
We have a requirement to add a field for "Shipping instructions" in SRM just like it appears in ECC PO at the item level.
I currently dont have access to SRM 7.0 system.
Can someone confirm if there is a std field for "Shipping instrucions" in SRM 7.0 just like in ECC?
If not,has anyone implemented a custom solution for such a field.If so,how?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Its possible to add new texts through customizing - standard SRM provides by default some notes like Internal note, Vendor note etc.
We could create our own text, assign these texts to text schema and then assign text schema to transaction type (SHC for shopping cart). This can be done through customizing and then this new text type will comeup for item.
Regards,
Prasanna

Change item level field (in table VEDA) in Contract (VA41)

Hi freinds,
I am creating a Contract (VA41) & I want to change the value of "Contract validity period" (VEDA-VLAUFZ) in item level.
Anyone know any exit to do that ?
I have tried user exits in MV45AFZZ, but there was no appropriate one where I could change this value.
Enhancement V45W0001 also doesnt work for me.
Thanks & Regards,
Alin

Hi Liju
Have you tried using MV45AFZZ: userexit_move_field_to_vbak or userexit_move_field_to_vbap. I guess here both VEDA and XVEDA are available.
I couldnt try myself as contract data doesnt get populated in our system.
Kind Regards
Eswar

SRM catalog setting to make items level field vissible.

Hi
I am dealing with SRM catalog activitities . I want to know the setting by which we make the field visible on portal at item level.
rgds
amarendra

Hello amarendra,
which field are you talking about ?
The one to access to catalog?
If yes, you have to maintain Web Service value for CAT attribute.
Regards.
Laurent.

Make Item level field Non-Editable in VA01

Dear Experts,
        I have a requirment to make ITEM Category field in item level of VA01
        make Non-editable based on the value of Sale order Type in the main screen
i am using Program MV45AFZZ to make necessary changes i am able change any thing on the header level but i am not geting the control of item level Please suggest me how to change or make fields non-editable in Item level.

Hi,
Try writing code in FORM userexit_field_modification.
*** Lock field pricing date in SO if delivery occured
IF   screen-name = 'VBAP-PSTYV' AND
       sy-tcode NE 'VA01' AND l VBAK-AUART EQ 'your document type'.
      screen-input = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    "USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
KR Jaideep,

Exit/bAdI for changing the item level field in VA02.

Dear Guruss...
I am facing a problem while trying toi change the account assignment group in VA02. The field is present at the iteem level in the tab BILLING.
When I change the field by choosing one of the values provided in the search help and enter, the value is again reset to its initial value. However if I change the value and SAVE (without pressing enter) then the value is saved.
The technical field name is VBAP-KTGRM, I have checked in the include:MV45AFZZ by putting break-points at all the forms but unfortunately none of them is getting triggered when I press enter.
During the debugging I found tha the values of the structure VBAP are overwritten by those of XVBAP everytime I press enter.
I also checked for the bAdI but can not get any help.
Is there any bAdI or exit that can help me for this????
Thanks in Advance......
Abhi.....

Hi Digvijay
   these are some of the enhancements/badi's which is related to t-code va02. just check it out
Transaction Code -               VA02          Change Sales Order
     Enhancement/ Business Add-in               Description
     Enhancement
     V60F0001               SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
     V46H0001               SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
     V45W0001               SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
     V45S0004               Effectivity type in sales order
     V45S0003               MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
     V45S0001               Update sales document from configuration
     V45P0001               SD customer function for cross-company code sales
     V45L0001               SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
     V45E0002               Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
     V45E0001               Update the purchase order from the sales order
     V45A0004               Copy packing proposal
     V45A0003               Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
     V45A0002               Predefine sold-to party in sales document
     V45A0001               Determine alternative materials for product selection
     SDTRM001               Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
     SDAPO001               Activating Sourcing Subitem Quantity Propagation
      Business Add-in
     BADI_SD_SCH_GETWAGFZ               Scheduling Agreement: Read WAGFZ from S073
     BADI_SD_V46H0001               SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
Regards
Zulfikhar ali
Edited by: Zulfikhar Ali Bhutto.N on Sep 23, 2011 11:15 AM

UserExit/BADI in 4.6C for Purcahse Order Import data change at Item Level

Hello ,
When we create a PO from Sales Order (I mean Simple Direct Delivery PO ) SAP allows the region of Destination always based on Plant leven , Now in my reuirement the same shuold be updated based onthe Customer in the sales order .
Anybody please provide if there is any chance to enhance to PO .
Hello Anybody please advise on this isssue ...
Regards,
Edited by: shishupalreddy ramreddy on Dec 15, 2008 7:29 AM

Hello ,
Thanks for the Reply ..
I tried the way you mentioned , But the Problem is after passingthe required value to C_HERKR ,
program is having a statement as below .
MOVE CORRESPONDING EIPO TO save_eipo LIKE STRUcture ...
In which HERKR field is not provided .
Pleae advise , anyhow I will try it again and seee
Thanks ,

CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN not updating the item level field

Hi All,
My requirement is to update a field called "CSC Code" in line item of sales order. hence for this case i am using "CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN" inside the "ORDER_SAVE" BADI. I am passing the ref guid, ref type, object name ,Logical Key and field name in the CHANGING parametrs CT_INPUT_FIELDS. I am passing the internal table containing the ref guid,ref type, partner fct ,partnerno to the internal table IT_PARTNER.
The FM gets executed without any error and the internal table IT_PARTNER is filled with the new CSC code but on checking in the sales order after saving the field is blank.
I have tried using wait up to 2 seconds. Even then it didn't work.
Can some one help me?
Thanks.

Could you please let me know how was it fixed... I have a similar kind of requirement
Edited by: rakesh chaitanya makkapati on Apr 7, 2010 4:49 PM

For PO output conditon, Could add po item level field as field catagory?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for