Forecast not generating beyond 12/01/14

Hi All,
I need your help in identifying the problem... I have setup Oracle Demantra(7.2) POC environment.
Problem : Forecast not getting generated till end of LEAD.
Details:
- Demantra 7.2
- Oracle DB 11g R2
All installed in the same host i.e. winxp. Forecast engine is generating the forecast successfully, however, only till 12/01/14
Few Engine parameters :
Lead : 280
maxsalesgen = null
Forecasthenerationhorizon = 30.00
HistoryLenght = 60
Max_fore_sales_date : 12-01-2014 (This field is disabled)
min_fore_sales_date : 08-04-2014
min_sales_date : 12-26-2006
Analysis :
1 -Forecast engine completed successfully.
2 - Forecast generated till 12/01/14, however it should be min_fore_sales_date + Lead (i.e 08-04-2014 + 280 = 5/11/15)
Already reviewed :
Doc ID 848205.1
Doc ID 1300071.1
Would appreciate any help around this.
Many Thanks
Amit

There is a series for "end of lifecycle date”.. plz refer it
hope you might have already analyzed based on dying time

Similar Messages

Forecast not generated in background

I have question on generating forecast in background, I am getting the message 'Mixed periodicities in a forecast are not allowed In Demand Planning'. I do understand that our planning book has Posting periods and Year along with FYV. But I created a data for Forecasting in Batch which has a planing buckets profile that has ONLY weeks as display periodicity for 30 months . And I am using this dataview to define the mass processing activity /job. I am still getting this error. we are on SCM 7.0 . . Any thoughts ?
Susan

Hi Susan
I had exactly the same problem today - what I explain below worked for me:
I went to transaction Define Planning Book -> Data View Tab -> then make sure that the TB profile (Future) / TB profile (Past) are both in the same periodicity as is the Data View you are using. I had a mixture there, Weekly View and TB Profiles in Months.
(I was trying to recalculate in batch using a weekly stats model).
It seems that I was trying to recalculate in batch Stat Forecast using a WEEKLY model and a Weekly view, however the TB Profiles for that Weekly view were in MONTHS and I was getting the same Mixed Periodicities error message.
I then tried recalculating in batch using a Monthly Stat model and the monthly view, that had matching TB Profile and it worked fine then. Of course end users may not be too keen, in which case a new Planning View with matching periodicity TB Profiles may be required.
The periodicity of the Stat Model should match the TB profile periodicity of the Planing Book Data view you are using in your batch job. Hope this helps a little.
Kind regards
Isla

MRP is not generating any schedule line in my vendor's scheduling agreement

Hello all,
My question is: why the MRP is not generating any new line in my vendor's scheduling agreement?
This is the scenario:
I have created a vendor's scheduling agreement with transaction ME31L
I have created a customer's scheduling agreement with transaction VA31 and those characteristics:
- Forecast scheduling lines
- JIT scheduling lines
- MRP to DS type assigned to type C: Requirements according to forecast delivery/Deliveries according to JIT
I have run MRP with transaction MD01
MRP is generating some purchasing requistions, not purchase orders because we have set up a release strategy which requires 2 approvals, but those purchasing requests are not generating any new line in the vendor's scheduling agreement.
Any idea why it could be? Please do not hesitate to ask for further explanations. Thank you

Hi,
Check if stock is available for the material in that plant.
Also check the requirement date for the material and compare it with the planning horizon for that plant.
Check your material master MRP view.
Create source list(for material and plant in question) with MRP indicator 2.
Thanks and Regards,
Maheshwari

Checksum not generated from dbms job

APEX version 3.2.0.00.27
DB version 11.2.0.1.0
I've built a database procedure which builds a string that includes a hyperlink, and which then passes that string to a procedure that sends the string as the body of an email.
The procedure calls apex_util.prepare_url to generate a checksum for the link.
I've added to the application a button which calls the procedure.
When I press the button, I get an email which contains the link with checksum.
I've also created a dbms_job that runs nightly. It calls the same email-generating procedure.
However, the email that the dbms_job generates does NOT include the checksum.
How can I ensure that the link includes a checksum when the dbms_job calls the procedure?
Thanks,
-Ken

Hello Ken,
>> Does anyone out there know if there is a way that I can obtain a valid APEX session id from within a procedure invoked through dbms_job?
I’m under the impression that you are trying to achieve a security goal using the wrong tool.
The Session State Checksum feature was design to prevent URL tampering within a specific APEX Session. That is why the Session ID is part of the computed checksum. Session State (represented by Session ID) is not persistent beyond the current and specific (user client) APEX Session. Even if you were able to obtain a valid APEX Session ID within an (APEX) external process (like stored procedure), for generating the *&cs* URL parameter, it won’t help you much. The user that received your e-mail, with the checksum protected URL, will not have the same APEX Session ID when he/she will try to use the URL (which includes a Session ID no longer valid), and the security check will fail (which is one of the purposes of this mechanism).
In your case, it seems that you need to generate a checksum parameter that is not dependent on the APEX Session, and you’ll need to do so yourself.
Regards,
Arie.
&diams; Please remember to mark appropriate posts as correct/helpful. For the long run, it will benefit us all.
&diams; Author of Oracle Application Express 3.2 – The Essentials and More

Income tax is not generating on Bonus for second time through off cycle

Dear All,
I have an issue related to bonus. We have given bonus off cycle in the month of August 16th income tax was deducted on bonus amout. Now again mgt is giving bonus through offcycle in the month of November 10th but the problem is Income tax is not getting calculated in this month for bonus. We have checked the calculations every thing is fine.
We have created 1 wage type for 1st time bonus as Special Bonus and 2nd time we have created another wage type as Diwali bonus. We have done configuration same as 1st wage type special bonus for Diwali bonus wage type.
Let me know where it went wrong.
Rgds,
Prasad

Hi Narendra,
Thanx for the response, i tried the above but not generating WT/460. can you explain the logic.,
Changed BON5 to BON3
created new Tax code ZTDR from STDR
Assigned Bonus WT ( in 0267) to ZTDR in Table T7INT9
didn't understand why /401 or MTDR or 9TDR
Thanks
Sanm

Miro line item not generated

Dear All,
I have facing one issue at the time posting in MIRO.
I post one of migo doc in date 03/01/2010 , the entry is:( with same material )
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
89              Stk.RM -IMP                                     32100.00
96              PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                     32100.00
40              Purchase RM-IMP                            32100.00
50              Purchase offset.                             32100.00
And Miro Posting on date 23/03/2010
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
31           xyz Vendor                                    32100.00
86           PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                    32100.oo
89           Stk.RM -IMP                                    -
40           Purchase RM-IMP                          -
50           Purchase offset.                           -
But when I post for another po in migo on date 03/01/2010
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
89              Stk.RM -IMP                                     76800.00
96              PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                     76800.00
40              Purchase RM-IMP                            76800.00
50              Purchase offset.                             76800.00
and miro posting on date 19/02/2010
Post key   description amt                               curr.( USD)
32            yz Vendor                                       76800.00
86           PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                      76800.00
89           Stk.RM -IMP                                      Line item not generated
40           Purchase RM-IMP                             Line item not generated
50           Purchase offset.                              Line item not generated
Can any one tell why line item not generated for miro posting .
Regards
Milind

Hi,
The extra line items will be generated when there are any exchange rate diffrences are there then only shows.
Other wise it wont show those extra line items
Please check group currency , global currency etc. for your extra line items

XML Publisher question - Not generating a valid XML file

I am working through an Oracle document that walks you through creating an XML Pub report. I am using HCM 8.9, Tools 8.49.15 and it has XML Pub installed and I have the Microsoft plug-in installed
I have created a query and have downloaded an rtf template and now am on a page where you enter your data source and then click ‘Generate’ for the sample data file. I did it and it created ‘PERSONAL_DATA_PAY.XML’ which is created from a PS Query. However if I click on ‘PERSONAL_DATA_PAY.XML’ it generates a blocky text file that is not an XML file and I can’t go any further.
Do you know why it’s not generating a valid XML file when I click on 'generate'?
Thanks
Allen H. Cunningham
Data Base Administrator - Oracle/PeopleSoft
Sonoma State University

You mean to say that you create a new data source by specifying Data Source Type as 'PS Query' and Data Source ID as your query name, you are not able to generate a valid XML file (by clicking on Generate link).
did you cross check your query by running it?
On field change of Generate link, PeopleSoft uses PSXP_RPTDEFNMANAGER and PSXP_XMLGEN app packagaes and query objects to create the file
It should work if you query is valid..

Inspection Lot not generated, with MIGO 561

Hello All,
Please help me with this issue.
WHen i do MIGO with 561, inspection lot is not generated.
So there is a setting in spro, if we check that, inspection lot wont be generated.
So now in my IDES, i tried to uncheck that box.
When i save this setting, I get the following error.
"Fill table key for table T156Q only up to position 010".
Please help with this issue.
Regards,
Piyush

To load initial inventory in Quality stock and release it using Inspection lot UD, use movement type 563 instead of 561.
With 561 movement stock is directly posted to un-restricted status. So there is nothing to be released from Quality stock.

Customized Seeded report to XMLP report but its not generating output file?

I want to customize "Dunning Letter Print from Dunning Letter Generate" Report, which is called from "Dunning Letter Generate" Report
Steps i followed to Customize reports are.
1. Changed output format to xml for "Dunning Letter Print from Dunning Letter Generate" Report.
2. Ran report to generate xml data and using xml data created RTF file
3. Registered data definition and template with code and short name same which is ARDLP_NON_SRS
Now while i am running report its completing normal, but its not generating output file giving Error like –
"Unable to find Published Output for this request"
“No Output File Exist for Request No - xxxxx”
No Idea why its not picking template, Can anyone help me in this?
Using:
Oracle Applications : 10.0.5.2,
MS Word 2007
Thanks,

I am not giving the solution, providing you a hint..
This is the query you need to satisfy,
SELECT NVL(R.DESCRIPTION ,CP.USER_CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_NAME)
FROM FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS R, FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL CP,XDO_DS_DEFINITIONS_B XDS
WHERE ( ( FND_PROFILE.VALUE('CONC_REPORT_ACCESS_LEVEL') = 'U'
AND R.REQUESTED_BY = :$PROFILES$.USER_ID ) or
( FND_PROFILE.VALUE('CONC_REPORT_ACCESS_LEVEL') = 'R'
AND R.RESPONSIBILITY_ID = :$PROFILES$.RESP_ID ) )
AND R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID = CP.APPLICATION_ID
AND R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID = CP.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID
AND XDS.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME=
( SELECT APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME
FROM FND_APPLICATION
WHERE APPLICATION_ID=CP.APPLICATION_ID)
AND XDS.DATA_SOURCE_CODE = CP.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_NAME
AND R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE='XML'
AND R.STATUS_CODE not in ('E', 'D', 'T', 'X')
ORDER BY R.REQUEST_ID DESC
Go to system profiles and query for 'Concurrent:Report Access Level', responsibility you need and modify the profile name accordingly....

Schedule lines not generated after MRP run

Dear All,
I am trying to create Schedule lines through MRP run , but instead system creates MRP element PRqRel and its PurRqs when i check in MD04 , the following are the prerequisite i done before MRP run , but still Schedule lines are not generating.
1.activated checkbox source list in material master.,Procurement type is F, MRP type PD , lot size MB , marked JIT Scheduling indicator as 1 in Pur view of material master , no MRP group is used in our process.
2.Maintained Inforecord.
3.Maintained source list for the material and marked MRP relevant as 2. Validity also checked.
4. Quota arrangement for this vendor only.
5. Created New scheduling agreement.
6. Material is not sent for subcontracting.
7. Ran MD02 with following parameters ,
Processing key NETCH Net Change in Total Horizon
Create purchase req. 1 Purchase requisitions in opening period
Delivery schedules 3 Schedule lines
Create MRP list 1 MRP list
Planning mode 3 Adapt planning data (normal mode)
Please let me know if i am missing something
Thanks in Advance
Benny

Hi,
Please check the below links...
Schedule Lines not getting created in MRP
Schedule Lines not generated for MRP Type PD
Kuber

Lines are not generated for holidays and sundays

Hi
creating a sale order shcedule lines are not generated for sunday for a particular plant .
Schedule lines are generated for subsequent monday only.
the plant calander is also correct
with regards
partha

Hi
I would really double check the factory calendar ans the of the plant and sales organisation
regards,
Sidi

BIP Report does not generate in Siebel 7.8

Hi Experts,
We are having a problem not generating BIP report in Siebel 7.8. It says 'failed to generate report'.
The xdo.log displays
[100710_043210802][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210802][][STATEMENT] Generating page [4]
[100710_043210802][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210802][][STATEMENT] Phase2 time used: 16ms
[100710_043210818][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210818][][STATEMENT] Total time used: 7141ms for processing XSL-FO
[100710_043210818][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.field.RTFFieldResult][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210833][oracle.apps.xdo.common.font.FontFactory][STATEMENT] type1.Helvetica closed.
[100710_043210833][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210833][oracle.apps.xdo.common.font.FontFactory][STATEMENT] type1.Helvetica-Bold closed.
[100710_043210849][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210849][][STATEMENT] FO+Gen time used: 7172 msecs
[100710_043210849][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210864][oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor][STATEMENT] clearInputs(Object) is called.
[100710_043210864][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210880][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210880][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.field.RTFFieldResult][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210896][oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor][STATEMENT] clearInputs(Object) done. All inputs are cleared.
[100710_043210896][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210896][oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor][STATEMENT] End Memory: max=508MB, total=388MB, free=231MB
[100710_043210896][oracle.apps.xdo.template.rtf.RTFParagraph][STATEMENT] stylename=Normal
[100710_043210911][][STATEMENT] PublicReportService::generateReport FINISH and Return BIPReportResponse --- Time Elapse = 149007
We cannot trace where the error is coming from. Can anyone know that to do about this? Thanks!
Edited by: user11174318 on Oct 7, 2010 4:58 AM

Hi,
Yes, this is fixed.
The root cause was a security patch from Microsoft.
The solution:
- Remove Microsoft Patch KB974455.
or
- uncheck the ‘Use HTTP 1.1’ flag under Internet Options > Advanced tab.
Regards,
Hakan

Part1 is not generating for Vendor Subsequent delivey

Hi ASAP
I hope you must be doing great; steps are as follow which Iu2019m following for vendor return and subsequent delivery for Raw / Capital goods.
1. PO -> MIGO (101) -> Excise capture & Posting using J1IEX -> MIRO.
For excise, part1 & 2 to relevant register posting has taken placed.
Now quality dept. has rejected the goods, for which vendor delivery should take place.
2. For Vendor return Delivery
MIGO 122 w.r.t GR of 101-> Excise capture & Posting using J1IS&V.
For Excise, Part1 is getting created using J1IS, J1IV is creating Part 2, in Acct. doc. RG23C BED/ECS/HEC is being Credit and "PLA On Hold" is being Debited for BED/ECS/HEC amount.
3. For Vendor subsequent delivery, I have done the excise config. for Movt. 123 .
MIGO 123 w.r.t. GR of 122.
While doing GR for 123, system is not generating Excise screen.
Any way, After GR of 123, I have Capture Excise Invoice after inputting all relevant data, but while Posting, System is generating message that Part1 is does not exist for vendor excise invoice.
Now I think requirement is visible for your understanding to suggest me some valuable idea.
If possible can plz drop a test mail to hksiva.manoj at gmail dot com for further clarification?
Thanks & Regards
Manoj K Singh

Hi Rajaram,
Thanks for your ealiest reply, yes i have done the config. which you suggested,
Even after this " Specify which mvt type involves excise invoices", assignment system is not generating Excise screen for Movt. 123 w. r. t. 122.
Manoj K Singh

Part1 is not Generating for Vendor Subsequent Delivery

Hi ASAP
I hope you must be doing great; steps are as follow which Iu2019m following for vendor return and subsequent delivery for Raw / Capital goods.
1. PO -> MIGO (101) -> Excise capture & Posting using J1IEX -> MIRO.
For excise, part1 & 2 to relevant register posting has taken placed.
Now quality dept. has rejected the goods, for which vendor delivery should take place.
2. For Vendor return Delivery
MIGO 122 w.r.t GR of 101-> Excise capture & Posting using J1IS&V.
For Excise, Part1 is getting created using J1IS, J1IV is creating Part 2, in Acct. doc. RG23C BED/ECS/HEC is being Credit and "PLA On Hold" is being Debited for BED/ECS/HEC amount.
3. For Vendor subsequent delivery, I have done the excise config. for Movt. 123 .
MIGO 123 w.r.t. GR of 122.
While doing GR for 123, system is not generating Excise screen.
Any way, After GR of 123, I have Capture Excise Invoice after inputting all relevant data, but while Posting, System is generating message that Part1 is does not exist for vendor excise invoice.
Now I think requirement is visible for your understanding to suggest me some valuable idea.
If possible can plz drop a test mail to hksiva.manoj at gmail dot com for further clarification?
Thanks & Regards
Manoj K Singh

Hi Rajaram,
Thanks for your ealiest reply, yes i have done the config. which you suggested,
Even after this " Specify which mvt type involves excise invoices", assignment system is not generating Excise screen for Movt. 123 w. r. t. 122.
Manoj K Singh

Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR

Dear all,
Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
Asset is Dr to GR/IR
Process is
1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
2. Customs miro based on p.o.
3. Do GR with excise
4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
What will be cause of this problem ?
How to solve this issue ?

The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
rewdzzzz is full if correct
Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM

Forecast not generating beyond 12/01/14

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for