Forms executable files execute very slow

I am using AS10g form services. But the form applet which executes at the client is very slow as compared to the previous version of forms like 6i
Data Entry is time comsuming, coz the applet taked time to open an LOV and in other operations.
Is there any way to speed up this process?

Forms 10g run as a Java applet in the browser. Java takes more resources on a PC than Forms 6i (client/server). Check your PC if you need more memory.
Also, check the Jinitiator cache settings.

Similar Messages

Saving files is very slow!!!

Since I installed (updated) from CS5 to CS5.1, saving files is very slow. It takes like 4 minutes save a 2048 X 2048 png file which used to take seconds in CS5.
I am not sure what changed... I completely uninstalled all versions of Photoshop. Re-downloaded from the website. Deleted my user preferences and the problem remains.
Why is saving so slow all of a sudden?
Using Windows 7 - 64 bit

Hm, that's kind of alarming. Is it happening with all files or just PNG.
If every file does that, it could be a possible indication that your disk is going bad...
Click Start and type view events into the search box.
When View event logs comes up, click it.
Navigate down into Windows Logs > System and see if there are any Error events there that indicate problems with your disk.
If this isn't the problem, it's possible that Photoshop is having to wait for a disk to spin up to be able to access it. Do you see the problem occur when you save again right away? Are you using an external drive for either file storage or as a scratch disk in Photoshop?
Lastly, you may have a stored printer or drive connection to a location on your network that does not exist now (or is not responding) and that has to time out before completing the operation. Have you changed anything in your network lately?
-Noel

Reading pdf files is very slow on my nokia 5800 mobile phone

Reading pdf files is very slow on my nokia 5800 mobile phone. I have Adobe Reader LE 2.5 and when i open any pdf file, it runs very slow and the scrolling is very slow in spite of opening pdf files which contain text only and in black color. I have tried also wrap text option and the problem persists. Is there anyway to reduce the quality of the pdf displayed on my mobile?? and What i have to do to make it run smooth and fast to make reading on my mobile possible???
Thanks in advance

I had the same problem and I culd not find the solution. I think it is a nokia issue, as I read it in several webs

What does 'include render files' option mean for when I duplicate a project. I deselected it and the duplicated file is very slow so maybe this has affected it. It's a shame cause original project is deleted. Have I lost the rendered files? Thanks

What does 'include render files' option mean for when I duplicate a project. I deselected it and the duplicated file is very slow so maybe this has affected it. It's a shame cause original project is deleted. Have I lost the rendered files? Thanks

Yes, if you duplicate without the render files and delete the original project you lose the render files. But render files get recreated - automatically if you have it set in the preferences (which is the default option). It just takes time.

Executable very slow

Good afternoon,
I have an application with 130 Mb which is working naked
multimedia kiosk but this very slow, there is a way to make it
faster? Click a button with a finger and so last 5 seconds is that
responds ...
Thank you and sorry for my English

mpinto_ wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I have an application with 130 Mb which is working naked
multimedia kiosk but
> this very slow, there is a way to make it faster? Click
a button with a finger
> and so last 5 seconds is that responds ...
> Thank you and sorry for my English
Hi,
Is the application 130MB in total or a single file? If it's a
single file, it does
sound large and I'd suggest it be broken into smaller
components that can be
linked to each other. There may be other ways your
application can be optimized
for better playback. Could you describe in more detail
exactly what you have in
your application (images, video etc.)
regards
Dean
Director Lecturer / Consultant / Director Enthusiast
http://www.fbe.unsw.edu.au/learning/director
http://www.multimediacreative.com.au
email: [email protected]

File transfer very slow with a SSTP VPN

I have a serer in the office and I connect from my house through a SSTP VPN. In my home computer (client) I add a new network folder, this networkf folder is in the server, that has a shared folder. I can transfer files, but is very slow.
For example, to transfer a folder that contain about 20 files, and in total are 11MB, it takes about 3 minutes. The server has a upload bandwidth of 890kbps. With teamviewer VPN takes about 1minute with 55 seconds.
The problema with the SSTP is that the transfer speed is not stable, bteween 0-200kbps. The problema is that when has to transfer a file, always the same, the speed drop to 0bytes/s and in this state is about 1-15 seconds and continue the transfer. Why?
So the total time at the end it's much more than the time that I need if the connection was stable and used all the bandwith. How I say, teamviewer VPN takes about 1:55 inteado of the 3:00 of SSTP.
Thank so much.

Hi ComptonAlvaro,
Please check if we have other program is connecting the Internet when we use the SSTP.
Additionally, we could contact the ISP to check the stability of network.
Regarding the slow SSTP performance issue, we could refer to the following thread similar to this issue.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8e8e4220-af25-4627-bed2-47db8c04d318/sstp-and-slow-transfer?forum=winserverNIS
Please take the following steps to fix this issue:
1. Add new registry key and value “ TcpAckFrequency=1 ” for all NICs on VPN server, so that we can reduce ACK delay.
2. Disable Windows 2008 SNP feature, and restart VPN server
3. Disable TCP Checksum offloading on VPN server
Hope it will be helpful.
Best regards,
Fangzhou CHEN
Fangzhou CHEN
TechNet Community Support

OSD: Downloading multiple files is very slow

I has a exe software. It is not a single file package, it contains a lot of files. when I installed this software in OSD, I found it would spend 15~20minutes to download files.
It was very strange. The software is only 750 mb size. the speed of downloading 6 GB OS image is also much faster than this software.
I know downloading multiple files is slower than downloading a single file, if their size are same.
But the downloading of multiple files in OSD is "really" very slow.
Why? Cause of BITS or RDC? How to fix it?
PS：I update to SCCM 2012 R2 with CU1, add the below into SCCM
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SMS\DP]
"RamDiskTFTPBlockSize"=dword:00004000
http://windowsdeployments.net/how-to-speed-up-pxe-boot-in-wds-and-sccm/
Now, the download speed up to 4 minutes, but it still slower than the normal copy & paste.
Test result:
OSD: 2.6G
single image, 2 minutes
OSD: 750m multiple files, 4 mintues
after OSD, copy & paste from network drive, 750 multiple files, 1 mintue

I had updated to CU1 and add this into regedit . It is quicker than before, but it still slower than the normal.
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SMS\DP]
"RamDiskTFTPBlockSize"=dword:00004000
http://windowsdeployments.net/how-to-speed-up-pxe-boot-in-wds-and-sccm/
Download 2.63 G OS image:
2min
Download 750 M multiple
files 4min

All my pdf files are very slow to download, scroll down and/or read.

I am having difficulties opening any pdf files as it is very slow, does not scroll down easily and just plain cumbersome. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this? Additionally, as soon as I want to open the file, the fan on the cpu starts. I am not sure if they are related, but it just happens all the time. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Sharam

Have you verified speed via speedtest.net ?
Have you checked at different times?
Check istumbler or netstumbler to verify interference
Make sure you are on your ISPs DNS (settings - network - configure DNS - automatic)

Time machine file transfer very slow during OSX 10.7 re-install

I am using a macbook pro, and was running 10.7. (not sure exact version, and cannot look now, but should have been up to date) I tried the free upgrade to Mavericks, but it failed and said I had a disk error. At this point I could not boot back to 10.7 so I booted with apple-R. I tried to do a repair from disk utility but that failed so I erased my hard drive. Then I proceeded with an install of 10.7, which proceeded fine. I got to a point where it asked about transferring files, (forget the exact wording) and I said to use my time machine backup (from right before I tried the upgrade - backup was 80GB) and I started that. It has been 16 hours and it still has not finished. The external hard drive (Lacie) clicks / whirs, and I see signs of very slow progress... (seems to be at about 80% now judging by the progress bar) but it can go hours without any noticeable change. The "time remaining" information is variable -- going up and down -- and is clearly not correct-- has said 1.5 to 2.5 hours for the last 12 hours
Any ideas? should I just wait a few more days   should I abort and restart the file transfer (if so, what is the best way to do this?)
I cannot provide details on the computer since it is still busily restoring (I hope), but it is roughly 3-4 years old, lots of free space on hard drive (>100GB),

These instructions must be carried out as an administrator. If you have only one user account, you are the administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
          SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
          View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar at the top of the screen.
In the top right corner of the Console window, there's a search box labeled Filter. Initially the words "String Matching" are shown in that box. Enter the word "Starting" (without the quotes.) You should now see log messages with the words "Starting * backup," where * represents any of the words "automatic," "manual," or "standard."
Each message in the log begins with the date and time when it was entered. Note the timestamp of the last "Starting" message that corresponds to the beginning of an an abnormal backup. Now
CLEAR THE WORD "Starting" FROM THE TEXT FIELD
so that all messages are showing, and scroll back in the log to the time you noted. Select the messages timestamped from then until the end of the backup, or the end of the log if that's not clear. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
☞ If all you see are messages that contain the word "Starting," you didn't clear the text field.
☞ The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
☞ Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

Apple File Sharing very slow with Mountain Lion

I've noticed since upgrading to 10.8 the transfer speeds over a LAN via AFP (File Sharing) are VERY slow.. in some instances. Based on the behaviour i'm guessing it has something to do with the amount of items.
for instance:
A folder that contains approx 122mb worth of 1500 small files takes me about 50 seconds to transfer while a long audio recording with a greater filesize of 125mb takes only 11 seconds.
using SCP from the command line the same 122mb folder took only 19 seconds while the audio took 10 seconds.
after performing the same operations on a computer running 10.6 I can deduce that the problem is on the receiving end. Audio file transfer times were the same, however the same folder of items took only 27 seconds when it was transferred to a computer running 10.6 regardless of which OS the computer sending the file was running.
apparently handling a greater number of files increases transfer time for both methods but AFP is painfully slow with 10.8 on the receiving end.
any thoughts or suggestions?
I've read a couple threads about people having trouble with Time Machine running slowly.. i wonder if this is related.

Same problem here. I just upgraded from Lion to Mountain Lion. I only got 19 GB of space, but Time Machine wants 10 hours, whereas in OSX Lion a full backup would take just under an hour, and incremental updates were lightning fast.
I even sat it up to do it overnight, but on 8 hours it was only half way through only 10 GB. I can't live with that in the future.
Im trying to backup on a SD card which seems to work very good in Lion. Im on a 2012 Macbook Air using a SSD.
My bite of the apple has been somewhat sour. I tried reformatting the SD card, well knowing that I would lose old backups. But still the backup is extremely slow. Now I can't install Lion or Mountain Lion from scratch without having to wait 10 hours for TM backup or installing tons of applications and settings again. Bummer. I'm never going to early adobt a OSX upgrade again.

Query Executing very slow.............

Hi All,
The below query takes long time to execute. Please review this and provide me the better solution by which i can get the faster result .
I have created the index in the txnlog table on timestamp,serialno, and in alt_merchant am on alt_merchantno and in txnlog_overrun on merchantno.
SELECT t.timestamp,t.wicno,t.merchantno,u.overrun_amount,NVL(ad.state,'N/A')
FROM txnlog t,txnlog_overrun u,alt_merchant am,address ad
WHERE t.timestamp > SYSDATE -15
AND t.timestamp=u.timestamp(+)
AND t.serialno=u.serialno(+)
AND t.wicno=am.alt_merchantno(+)
AND t.merchantno=am.merchantno(+)
AND am.ADDRESSID=ad.addressid(+)
Txnlog having millions of records.
Regards,
Nitesh

Have you tried tracing the session and using tkprof on the resulting trace file?
EXECUTE dbms_support.start_trace_in_session (<sid>,<serial#>,binds=>true,waits=>true);
Then execute the query.
You can find more information about SQL Trace and TKPROF at the following link.
http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/sqltrace.htm

SQL server 2000 Procedure executing very slower in SQL 2012

Hi,
I've migrated my database from SQL 2000 to SQL 2012 using SQL2008 as intermediate. After migration, I found that one of my procedure is timing out from web site. When I run that procedure in Management Studio, it takes 42 seconds to display result. The same
query is executed in 3 seconds in SQL 2000 version (in first run it takes 10 seconds in SQL 2000 and second run it took 3 seconds only). But in SQL 2012 second and third time also it took 36 seconds. Can anyone explain why the query takes longer time instead
of less time after the upgrade?
Our prod deployment date is approaching so any quick help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

You need to compare the execution plans of queries running in 2000 and 2012 to pin point why there is a difference.
However, have you made sure that you have reindexed the indexes and updated the stats and you still see the difference? If not, please do that and test again.
Could you post the execution plans?
Also read this -
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2015/01/30/frequently-used-knobs-to-tune-a-busy-sql-server.aspx
Regards, Ashwin Menon My Blog - http:\\sqllearnings.com

Reports executing very slow

Hi,
I have made a Z Report "Daily Distach Statement" . It is working perfect and show result with in 20-25 seconds. but when this report is executed by 5-6 users in same time then its take more than 600 seconds. So what is the reason behind this.What should i do in my code ? if anyboady has solution pls reply me.
thanks and regards
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh,
Check whether the report is updating any database table. Seems that when one user executes the report..he puts a lock on a particular table & hence others have to wait untill the lock is release.
Check transaction SM12 while the reports are executed. It will give a list of tables which are locked.
Best regards,
Prashant

Two issues: Runtime error when trying to Reduce Size or Optimize File. And navigation in some files is VERY SLOW.

I haven't figured out if there is a pattern here, as of yet.
This happens with larger files (1500 pages and so forth) and not all the time.
- Bookmarks may take up to 4-5 seconds to go to its page. Scrolling up and down pages is just as painfully slow.
Even when I break the big file into smaller sections, the navigation remains slower than molasses.
- When I try to Optimize certain files, or Reduce their size, I get a Runtime Error. I have disable the Updater (I read this could be an issue) but that made no difference. I have also broken the larger files into 2 or 3 pieces. One of the pieces may work out well (I can optimize and so forth) but the other(s) may not.
Thank you.
PS: I use Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 3. I have requested an upgrade (several times) but my wishes are not their command, I am afraid.

HI ,Thanks for your response. That was an error in the code I posted, but wasn't the error I was trying to solve. Once correcting that error you pointed out I am getting the problems not when I send a plain text email like:
          if(!sendmultipart)
             // send a plain text message
             msg.setContent(msgText, "text/plain");
          }but when I try and send multipart messages doing this:
          else
             // send a multipart message// create and fill the first message part
                   MimeBodyPart mbp1 = new MimeBodyPart();
     mbp1.setText(msgText);
      // create and fill the second message part
     MimeBodyPart mbp3 = new MimeBodyPart();
     // attach the file to the message
     FileDataSource fds = new FileDataSource(soundfile);
     mbp3.setDataHandler(new DataHandler(fds));
     mbp3.setFileName(fds.getName());
                   Multipart mp = new MimeMultipart();
     //adds the text to the message
      mp.addBodyPart(mbp1);
      //adds the attachment to the message
      mp.addBodyPart(mbp3);
       // adds the content to the message
      msg.setContent(mp);
     }So i get the error when executing the else branch.
Can you spot any errors here? I get the same error as mentioned earlier.
Thanks a lot,
Jess

.MKV files play very slow on my MacBook Pro (3gb ram). What do u suggest?

Hey FOlks.
Just wondering if anyone else is experiencing slow rendering (playing) of .MKV files on their MacBook Pro. And what to do?
I have Perian, but Im not convinced QT or Front Row can play .MKV files.
What do you recommend? What software for mac that can handle .MKV files good?
CoreAVC?
-Joey

It could be a 'difficult' form of Matroska file. FYI Matroska is just a container like MOV or AVI, and some mkv have the video encoded with Real Video Codec (RV9 RV10). Perian+QT can't decode this, but VLC will play .mkv files just fine on OS X, as long as they don't use H.264!
It's a bit of a lottery until Matroska decide to properly support the Apple platform. I have found this:
http://mkv4mac.free.fr/index.php?lang=en&p=lec
which may help.
But there may be another workaround: 1. Get Info the mkv file
2. Change to extension to wmv. Save as wmv and that could work better.

Forms executable files execute very slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for