Forms6i render=0 option

Hi,
We are running a client/server Forms6i application. An issue was raised with Forms6i which is that when you click on an item, you have to click again in order to select the text in it. This is different behaviour to Forms4.5 where it was possible to click on an item and select the text in one operation.
The render=0 runtime option will overcome this problem in 6i but I am unable to find any documentation that describes exactly what this does - as we would like to know any side effects.
Does anyone know anything about the values for render and the effect of using it?
TIA
Steve

Hi,
The render=0 is an undocumented runform parameter. This parameter will cause all text items to have rendered set to false. "Rendering" is the act of drawing a picture. In the context of the Windows environment, "Rendering" is the act of drawing a picture of a GUI widget that looks just like a normal widget, except for the fact that it does not use up resources like a normal widget would. Normally you use this option with GUI testing tools.
Frank

Similar Messages

Render Setting Options window

Hello all,
what happened to the Render Setting Options window in CC Particle World. Its where you can set how the paricle bounce off the ground. I remember it from CS4. but in CS5.5 its not there. Maybe I'm confusing it with some other plugin.
On a Mac
CS 5.5
Thanks

All options are in the main interface. There is no more custom settings panel.
Mylenium

Difference Between the Render Preview Options

Hi,
I am quite new to using Lightroom and I would love someone to explain to me in laymans terms what the difference is between the render preview options when importing images in Lightroom 3.2. It seems very hard to find any info on it elsewhere.
Any help would to choose between 'Minimal', 'Embedded & Sidecar', 'Standard' and '1:1' to improve my workflow would be much appreciated.
If it makes a difference... I work with relatively large batches of around 1,000 - 1,500 raw images that I create edits of and convert to jpeg. I am using a 27" iMac i5 with 8gb of ram.

See the information I provided in the FAQ at http://forums.adobe.com/thread/358026?tstart=0

What does 'include render files' option mean for when I duplicate a project. I deselected it and the duplicated file is very slow so maybe this has affected it. It's a shame cause original project is deleted. Have I lost the rendered files? Thanks

What does 'include render files' option mean for when I duplicate a project. I deselected it and the duplicated file is very slow so maybe this has affected it. It's a shame cause original project is deleted. Have I lost the rendered files? Thanks

Yes, if you duplicate without the render files and delete the original project you lose the render files. But render files get recreated - automatically if you have it set in the preferences (which is the default option). It just takes time.

Render all options: all options selected?

After reading the manual I got more confused...
I am exporting a self-contained QT. I want the best quality.
Before exporting, I want to render.
Am I 100% safe if I :
RENDER ALL > Select all the options (all the colors, even the ones I don`t need!) > RENDER ALL both video and audio ?
Should I select the whole sequence in the time line ?
Thanks a lot.

It will not hurt to have all the colors selected (even unlimited) before rendering.
Whether that will speed up the export, I don't believe it will.
Exporting to QT, the render does not matter. If it is not rendered it will be. Even if you are not selecting recompress each frame.
The unlimited option (or orange) is the one I generally turn off, because we do a lot of HDV. Unlimited tries to conform it to HDV when I don't need it to. So the option just above (Full) will suffice.
I would recommend you render all with all options except unlimited before exporting.
When it comes to selecting. I would recommend having ALL selected (Command+A) or none at all (ShiftCommandA). Make sure you don't have one video selected and also make sure you have the timeline selected, otherwise it might export the item in your viewer.
That's my advice. Hope it helps

Render Format options

Render Format in FCP X project settings doesn't have a h264 option, only various ProRes. In this case I don't see a point of "native AVCHD" editing. Exporting with "current settings" gives you video with ProRes which requires transcoding to H264 and takes a very long time.

Thank you for your answers. That is true, after doing some more testing speed of export doesn't seem too bad. My first test export to H.264 seemed quite slow on my MacBook Pro, about 6 hours for 2 hour long project. That might have been for other reasons, since other tests with short videos gave me much better results - about 12min for 8min project. More important to me was a questions whether it is possible to avoid intermediate codecs in FCP X "native" editing and it looks like it is not possible. Yes, you don't have to created ProRes files during import, but during edit you still create ProRes file which has to be recompressed during export if you want your resulting file to have the same codec as source file, e.g. H.264. I was hoping that export speed in this case would be even faster. I was aware about the typical workflow where you create a ProRes file in FCP and then use Compressor to create whatever format you want. This is nothing new and that's what most people did in FCP 7.

Use maximum render quality option unavailable

CS 4.2.1, AME 4.2
I don' t see this option in AME setting (that little drop down on the right side). Anyway to enable it?
Thanks!

MainConcept *usually* has their own export interface. Is MRQ available if you just do a native Pr export?
-Jeff

Render once option instead of in After effects, Premier Pro & Encore

Sorry if this has been asked before, but cant see it - and I am fairly new to after effects. I have CS6.
I edit non-league football matches (soccer...) and so use a template package for all the graphics - goal scorers, team line-ups, a constant score in teh corner etc. THe graphics are done in After Effects, and brought into Premier Pro using Adobe Dynamic Link. Once the graphics have been done, I dont need to alter them in any way.
I then do the editing in Premier Pro - and move the imported graphics onto the timeline - but they are unencoded, which makes watching them back slow and jerky. If I want to render the timeline it obviously improves, but when I add in another graphic, it seems to have to re-render everything, every time.
It then takes up ages to export to h.264 for YouTube - so presume it re-renders again.
Finally, when usin encore for the dvd - I presume it re-renders yet again, because that takes hours.
Is there a way I could get After Effects to render once only, and then when it imports into PP - it treats it as a normal moving graphic, and the same with encore?
I have tried exporting the files individually, but instead of getting a clear background (so you can see behind it) - it comes up black.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Lee

You can export from AE with a lossless codec like Lagarith.
Make sure it is set to 32 bit (RGB+Alpha), that will give you transparancy.
Drop this into Premiere timeline.
Export to H.264 for Youtube or
For making a dvd you can either use Dynamic Link or export from PP to mpeg2-dvd and import that into Encore.

Importing Render/Export Options into CS6

Hello,
I am now working in CS6 and require a number of render settings that I have used in CS5. I was hoping for an easy fix to be able to utilize my (10-15) different settings from CS5 in CS6, but I have not found a solution just yet. Does anyone know of a quick way I can import these settings (either through the Finder on OSX or from within AE)?
Thanks,
Mike

If you are referring to Render Settings templates and Output Module templates, yes, you can transfer them between versions.
In AE CS5, go to Edit > Templates > Render Settings or > Output Module. Click the Save All button in the lower left. In AE CS6, do the same but click the Load button and choose the file you saved from CS5.
You will likely get a warning message about duplicate template names, due to the default templates from CS5 being a part of the package.

PS CS6 Render Video lacks options on OSX

I can see that the render video options are vastly different in OS X and Windows versions of PS CS6. Not only they are different layed out but as far as I can see a wide range of codecs are missing on the OS X version.
In particular, how can I export a video file using QuickTime container and H.264 codec in OS X version? If You select H.264 video it creates an .mp4 file whereas I wnat a .mov file. Same codec but different container.
Thanks

In PC CS6 Video Presets foldet the are three sub folders the file name are the name of the preset I see in video export
DPX Presets
01920 x 1080 24p Full Range (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 24p Full Range (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 24p Over Range (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 24p Over Range (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 24p Standard (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 24p Standard (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 24p Video (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 24p Video (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Full Range (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Full Range (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Over Range (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Over Range (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Standard (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Standard (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Video (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 25p Video (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Full Range (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Full Range (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Over Range (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Over Range (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Standard (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Standard (max bit depth).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Video (8bit).epr
01920 x 1080 30p Video (max bit depth).epr
02048 x 1152 24p Full Range (max bit depth).epr
02048 x 1152 24p Over Range (max bit depth).epr
02048 x 1152 24p Standard (max bit depth).epr
02048 x 1152 24p Video (max bit depth).epr
04096 x 2048 24p Full Range (max bit depth).epr
04096 x 2048 24p Over Range (max bit depth).epr
04096 x 2048 24p Standard (max bit depth).epr
04096 x 2048 24p Video (max bit depth).epr
H264 Presets
1_High Quality.epr
2_Medium Quality.epr
3_Low Quality.epr
Android Phone & Tablet - 480p 29.97.epr
Android Phone & Tablet - 480p Widescreen 29.97.epr
Android Phone - 320x240 29.97.epr
Android Phone - 360p Widescreen 29.97.epr
Android Tablet - 1080p 29.97.epr
Android Tablet - 720p 29.97.epr
Apple iPhone, iPod - 320x240 24.epr
Apple TV, iPad, iPhone 3G and newer - 360p Widescreen 24.epr
Apple TV, iPad, iPhone 4 and newer - 720p 29.97.epr
HD 1080i 25 (1.33 PAR).epr
HD 1080i 25.epr
HD 1080i 29.97 (1.33 PAR).epr
HD 1080i 29.97.epr
HD 1080p 24 (1.33 PAR).epr
HD 1080p 24.epr
HD 1080p 25.epr
HD 1080p 29.97.epr
HD 720p 24.epr
HD 720p 25.epr
HD 720p 29.97.epr
NTSC DV 24p.epr
NTSC DV Widescreen 24p.epr
NTSC DV Widescreen.epr
NTSC DV.epr
PAL DV Widescreen.epr
PAL DV.epr
Vimeo HD 1080p 29.97.epr
Vimeo HD 720p 25.epr
Vimeo HD 720p 29.97.epr
Vimeo SD Widescreen 29.97.epr
YouTube HD 1080p 29.97.epr
YouTube HD 720p 25.epr
YouTube HD 720p 29.97.epr
YouTube SD 360p Widescreen 29.97.epr
Quicktime Presets
Animation High Quality.epr
Animation Medium Quality.epr
JPEG 2000 High Quality.epr
JPEG 2000 Medium Quality.epr
Uncompressed.epr

How do you FORCE FCPx to re-render a clip?

here's the problem.
Final Cut Pro X FREQUENTLY screws up transition renders. Did I say FREQUENTLY? It CANNOT be stressed enough, that FCPx DOES SOMETHING BAD to its transition renders Quite Often.
ok, until Apple fixes that nightmare, I want a workaround. I thought I had it:
if you hit control+r you tell FCPx to 'render selection.' its right there in the menu.
but its a lie. what it SHOULD read in the menu is: 'render selection, if it is not already marked as having been rendered.' This is a problem for me, because FCPx FREQUENTLY SCREWS UP TRANSITION RENDERS*.
*ok, I think I've said it enough, time for an example:
imagine a crossfade, standard, stock crossfade, using the standard timing... EVERYTHING is standard. Well, How would you feel if you were scrubbing an otherwise perfect edit... to find that your crossfades... ALL OF THEM... pop the resulting image, into the first frame of the transition? I bet you'd be mad.
How would you feel if you HAD NO RELIABLE WAY TO FORCE FCPx TO RE-RENDER THOSE TRANSITIONS? You'd be livid. Lets put some more firewood on here... How would you feel if this happened randomly, all the time? I really do mean ALL THE TIME. I can scarcely look at FCPx without it screwing up the transitions of my edit.
point is. FCPx has a wonderful editor. its a joy to use. But its chock FULL of bugs, and its so SMUG that it doesn't provide ANY workarounds. The Documentation is a joke. So I'm here... trying to find a way To FORCE FCPx to re-render something IT thinks is already rendered. the smug jerk.

OP here.
I'd like to make a few comments.
Apple has been slowly fixing critical bugs in FCPx, I'm happy with the direction things are headed. But we still have a long way to go.
the "delete Project Render Files" option is a late edition, and I "think" it is meant to address this specific issue. I find however that in practice, it introduces as many problems as it solves. deleting the project render files forces a re-render on the entire timeline, and as stated way back in the OP, FCPX screws up transition renders.
Let me dig into that a little bit. Randomly, FCPx will cut out the first frame of a transiton, creating a jarring full frame jump (as it skips to the second frame) just at the front of a transition, and fill the last frame with black. All I want to do at this maddening point is force FCPX to re-render specific parts of the show, one at a time, because if I ask it to render the other stuff, invariably I will be subjected to the same amount of render bugs I am trying to eliminate. (or more) FCPX does this randomly, so if I can force it to re-render only a specific segment, there's a chance it won't render that bit incorrectly. And with finite control, I can step through and fix each transition, forcing as many re-renders as necessary, always getting closer to done, rather than starting from scratch at every step.
so, the tip is appreciated, it just doesn't answer my needs. I like FCPX, and sometimes its a dream but it is still riddled with critical bugs and the lack of percision control over the system is a design flaw, IMHO.

How to Hide "Select All | Select None" options for tableSelectMany?

I don't want to display this - is there a way to hide or not render these options? thanks

Hi Gaurav,
I have added detail region in Advanced table components and if i use standard Multiselection feature the select column will be displayed first in the table but here the framework by default displays select all and select none links.
I though of adding a data column in advance table and add a item of type MessageCheckbox but since i have detail region the custom select column is displaying next to detail column but they want to display select column in the beginning.
Hope ur clear of the requirement.
Thanks
Babu

Imported PSD as Comp - options

When I import a PSD as a comp, I'm presented with the usual option to keep Layer Styles editable or merge them.
What should I choose if my PSD doesn't use any layer styles at all? Does AE process/render one option faster than the other?
(Would be nice if AE was smart enough to tell I'm not using any Layer Styles)

Merge. If it turns out that you're wrong and there were actually layer styles that you wanted editable, you can later convert merged layer styles into editable layer styles.
Please submit a feature request regarding having the dialog box at import show a different (more limited) set of options if the PSD file doesn't have any layer styles. You could even phrase it as a bug report.

Quicktime not an option on Sequence settings Video preview

In the sequence settings, under video preview, "Quicktime" is not listed as a Preview File Format.
Running Windows 8.1, 64bit
I have installed the latest Quicktime, uninstalled it, reinstalled it, repaired it, to no avail.
Also I have done the same with Premiere Pro, uninstalling and reinstalling.
Here is a screenshot of the drop-down menu that does not have the Quicktime option.
I have run out of ideas for how to get this to appear, so I came here :/
Thanks in advance!

[Here's the one response from the duplicate thread.]
The Preview format options have always been somewhat limited. Consider this, that the previews should be just that - previews. When you have sufficient effects added to a clip to where it won't play smoothly in the timeline, you might wish to render it to get a better idea how the finished product will look. However, when you do the final export, best to NOT check the box for "Use Previews", since you would then be re-encoding (recompressing) the clip a second time. Better to export right the timeline, encoding straight from the source to final destination, diregarding any render previews you might have made.
Maybe you can elaborate on the intended use or workflow of your desired preview format? I'm a PC user and I think that on the Mac, with FCP, one had the option to render previews as QuickTime and those files could then be stitched together at the end without transoding them again, but not so with Premiere.
You might find that different Sequence Presets will provide different render preview options. 1280x960 is a non-standard format so that could limit your options.
Thanks
Jeff Pulera
Safe Harbor Computers

Bit Depth and Render Quality

When you finally export media to some sort of media format via the encoder does the projects preview Bit Depth and Render Quality settings affect the output file?
I know there is "Use Preview files" setting in the media exporter dialogue but I just want to be sure of what I am doing.

Jeff's response is my perspective, as well, which is both backed up by my own tests and the official Adobe word.
Exhibit A: My Tests
That is DV footage with a title superimposed over it in a DV sequence, with a Gaussian blur effect (the Premiere accelerated one) applied to the title; all samples are from that sequence exported back to DV. This was to show the relative differences of processing between software and hardware MPE, Premiere export and AME queueing, and the effect of the Maximum Bit Depth and Maximum Render Quality options on export (not the sequence settings; those have no bearing on export).
The "blooming" evident in the GPU exports is due to hardware MPE's linear color processing. I think it's ugly, but that's not the point here. Further down the line, you can see the effect of Maximum Bit Depth (and MRQ) on both software MPE and hardware MPE. I assume you can see the difference between the Maximum Bit Depth-enabled export and the one without. Bear in mind that this is 8-bit DV footage composited and "effected" and exported back to 8-bit DV. I don't understand what your "padding with zeroes" and larger file size argument is motivated by--my source files and destination files are the same size due to the DV codec--but it's plainly clear that Maximum Bit Depth has a significant impact on output quality. Similar results would likely be evident if I used any of the other 32-bit enabled effects; many of the color correction filters are 32-bit, and should exhibit less banding, even on something 8-bit like DV.
Exhibit B: The Adobe Word
This is extracted from Karl Soule's blog post, Understanding Color Processing: 8-bit, 10-bit, 32-bit, and more. This section comes from Adobe engineer Steve Hoeg:
1. A DV file with a blur and a color corrector exported to DV without the max bit depth flag. We
will import the 8-bit DV file, apply the blur to get an 8-bit frame,
apply the color corrector to the 8-bit frame to get another 8-bit frame,
then write DV at 8-bit.
2. A DV file with a blur and a color corrector exported to DV with the max bit depth flag. We
will import the 8-bit DV file, apply the blur to get an 32-bit frame,
apply the color corrector to the 32-bit frame to get another 32-bit
frame, then write DV at 8-bit. The color corrector working on the 32-bit
blurred frame will be higher quality then the previous example.
3. A DV file with a blur and a color corrector exported to DPX with the max bit depth flag. We
will import the 8-bit DV file, apply the blur to get an 32-bit frame,
apply the color corrector to the 32-bit frame to get another 32-bit
frame, then write DPX at 10-bit. This will be still higher quality
because the final output format supports greater precision.
4. A DPX file with a blur and a color corrector exported to DPX without the max bit depth flag.
We will clamp 10-bit DPX file to 8-bits, apply the blur to get an 8-bit
frame, apply the color corrector to the 8-bit frame to get another
8-bit frame, then write 10-bit DPX from 8-bit data.
5. A DPX file with a blur and a color corrector exported to DPX with the max bit depth flag.
We will import the 10-bit DPX file, apply the blur to get an 32-bit
frame, apply the color corrector to the 32-bit frame to get another
32-bit frame, then write DPX at 10-bit. This will retain full precision through the whole pipeline.
6. A title with a gradient and a blur on a 8-bit monitor. This will display in 8-bit, may show banding.
7. A title with a gradient and a blur on a 10-bit monitor
(with hardware acceleration enabled.) This will render the blur in
32-bit, then display at 10-bit. The gradient should be smooth.
Bullet #2 is pretty much what my tests reveal.
I think the Premiere Pro Help Docs get this wrong, however:
High-bit-depth effects
Premiere Pro includes some video effects and transitions
that support high-bit-depth processing. When applied to high-bit-depth
assets, such as v210-format video and 16-bit-per-channel (bpc) Photoshop
files, these effects can be rendered with 32bpc pixels. The result
is better color resolution and smoother color gradients with these
assets than would be possible with the earlier standard 8 bit per
channel pixels. A 32-bpc badge appears
to the right of the effect name in the Effects panel for each high-bit-depth
effect.
I added the emphasis; it should be obvious after my tests and the quote from Steve Hoeg that this is clearly not the case. These 32-bit effects can be added to 8-bit assets, and if the Maximum Bit Depth flag is checked on export, those 32-bit effects are processed as 32-bit, regardless of the destination format of the export. Rendering and export/compression are two different processes altogether, and that's why using the Maximum Bit Depth option has far more impact than "padding with zeroes." You've made this claim repeatedly, and I believe it to be false.
Your witness...

Forms6i render=0 option

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for