Four systems transport landscape

Hi,
We have introduced pre-production environment.Now we need to configure 4 system transports.
How to configure 4 system transport landscape.
- Kristene

Hello,
You need two do 2 things:
1. Include the system into your existing transport domain.
2. Re-configure the transport routes
To include the system into your existing transport domain check the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/44/b4a0c17acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
To re-configure the transport routes:
You simply need to login into the 000 client of your domain controller and re-configure your transport routes.
as described in the link given below:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/44/b4a1df7acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Once you have re-configured the transport routes, do not forget to distribute the configuration.
Regards,
Siddhesh

Similar Messages

Four system transport domain configuration

Hi,
Currently we have three system landscape DEV>QA>Prod
Now we are introducing one more environment (Training) .That means when you release the request from QA then it has to be populate to Production and Training environment.
Now my question is how to configure STMS for 4 system landscape?
Please suggest if you have done this scenario.
- Kristene

Hi Bernard,
I thought of moving it to another forum (NW Admin), but then I discovered it was there already... (cross-posted)... together with 154 other "unresolved" questions
The question of the transport domain, group, controller, etc design (in general) does have security related aspects, so I will leave it open.
Cheers,
Julius
@ Kristene, please follow up on your questions... and close them if answered...

Automatic Transport Mechanism to four systems in same landscape

Hi,
We have come across a requirement where we need to transport a request to four systems instead of traditional three.
The systems involved are - DEV (Development), QAS (Quality), PRD (Production) and TRG Training).
Currently the transport route is setup for three systems and we need to add the fourth one - Training system. The solution we are looking for is once the request is imported in Production it should be imported automatically in Training system, without any manual intervention.
The version being used in ERP 5.0.
Any input in this reagrd is much appreciated.
Regards,
Rajeev

Hi,
You can configure the transport route accordingly
Then Click on the system where you want to schedule the auto import job (Training System ). Once you are in the import queue of that system (Tranining ), click on import all request (Big truck). After choose option - at start time and give a period say from today 7 AM and then choose the period option like (every 15 mins) and save this. It will release a periodic job running every 15 mins in your system with the name TMS_00000000XXTMS_TP_IMPORT.

Unicode and Non-Unicode Instances in one Transport Landscape

We have a 4.7 landscape that includes a shared global development system supporting two regional landscapes. The shared global development system is used for all ABAP/Workbench activity and for global customization used by both regional production systems. The two regional landscapes include primarily three instances - Regional Configuration, Quality Assurance, and Production. The transport landscape includes all systems with transport routes for global and regional.
A conversion to unicode is also being planned for the global development and one regional landscape. It is possible that we will not convert the other regional landscape due to pending discussions on consolidation. This means one of the regional landscapes will be receiving global transports from a unicode-based system.
All information I've located implies no actual technical constraints. Make sure you have the right R3trans versions, don't use non-Latin_1 languages, etc. Basic caveats for a heterogenous environment ....
Is anyone currently supporting a complete, productive landscape that includes unicode and non-unicode systems? If so, any issues or problems encountered with transports across the systems? (insignificant or significant)
Information on actual experiences will be greatly appreciated ....
Many thanks in advance.

Hi Laura,
Although i do not have the live / practical experience, but this is what i can share.
I have been working on a Non-Unicode to Unicode conversion project. While we were in the discussion phase there was one such possibility of a scenario that part of the landscapes would remain non-unicode. So based on the research i did by reading and directly interacting with some excellent SPA consultants, i came to know there are absolutely no issues in transporting ABAP programs from a Unicode system to non-unicode system. In a Unicode system the ABAP code has already been checked and rectified for higher syntax checks and these are downward compatible with the ABAP code on lower ABAP versions and non-unicode systems. Hence i beleive there should not be any issues, however as i mentioned this is not from practical experience.
Thanks.
Chetan

Transport strategy for your transport landscape is inconsistent

Hello everybody,
we had 4 system landscape.
DEV>QAS>TST-->PRD.
we move the request from DDEV >QAS>TST and then forward request from TST to PRD system.
Now, we have delete the system TST from TMS, after deletion it give the warning.
Transport strategy for your transport landscape is inconsistent.
Message No. XT481
Please suggest, what is meaning of this warning and how to correct.
Thanks
Ganesh

You need to do following
1. Logon to domain controller client 000 -->STMS --> Overview System --> Select TST --> SAP System --> Delete
2. Reconfigure STMS DEV>QAS>PRD
3.STMS --> Overview Transport Routes --> Configuration --> Distribute and Activate (To All System)
Note : You should do this from Domain Controller client 000
I assumed you know Step 2. If you dont please let me know i can guide you on that as well
Cheers !
Manish

Transport landscape best practise

I'm wondering if SAP has a best practise document on transport landscape planning.
SAP Help has pretty clear description about a standard 3 system landscape. But not document is found describing complext transport landscape considerations --- multiple ABAP development/test systems, conflict resolution between project landscape and maintenance landscape.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.

Hi. GO to http://help.sap.com/bp/initial/index.htm
There you find all about BP.
Regards, Award if helpful

Advantages of CTS+ over File system transport

Hello experts,
I have searched a lot on SDN ,but couldn't find a document which exactly explains the advantages and disadvantages of CTS+ over File system Transport basically a table with points and the status of those points with CTS+ and File System Transport.
Can you please help.
Best Regards,
Shweta

The enhanced Change and Transport System (CTS+) enables you to transport Portal/Java objects and SAP-related non-ABAP applications in your system landscape, along with your ABAP objects. You can also administer non-ABAP systems in a CTS transport domain in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/45/ec25370fdc3481e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
You can integrate NWDI with CTS+ and have the transports moved through CTS+.
Also, you utilize CTS+ for portal related transports as well.
To start with, have a look at the following How to guides:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b0ebf83b-6201-2b10-b58b-c14d3d3b6f61
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0249083-c0ab-2a10-78b8-b7a7854b1070
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/f0f75302-bf8b-2b10-d991-ee42c8de8eec
Regards
Pothana

Transport Landscape design??

Hi all,
Our client is saying that they require 2 Development system,2 Quality & 1 Production System.How will we design our Transport Landscape??Is it possible to have 2 development & 2 QA in one system landscape??

Hi,
This configuration is very much possible, in fact i have worked with a client with similar configuration.
Transport route can be
DEV1->QA1->PRD
DEV2->QA2->PRD
Now whenever request from DEV1 reaches production it should also simultaneously move to DEV2 and QA2.
The reverse is to be done when request from DEV2 reaches PRD, it needs to be flushed back to DEV1 and QA1
This is needed to maintain synchronization between two DEV and QA
Synchronization danger occurs in scenario when changes/enhancements of similar type are performed at same time in both dev.
Hence any changes/Enhancements planned should be checked for clash or else synchronization is extremely difficult to achieve.

System and landscape estiamte for SCM on Hana for Practice use

Hi All ,
We want to know the System and landscape estiamte for SCM on Hana for Practice use.
Regards,
Abhishek

Hi,
Perhaps this link could help
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SMSETUP/MaintenanceofProductintheSystemLandscape
Also check out the note :
For SCM Add-On Products like SAP SNC, SAP EM, SAP F&R the basis component (SAP Netweaver Release) has to be also assigned as relevant Product Instance
Might be helpful, if you check the product versions being reported for the system in the SLD.
Regards,
Srikishan

System / transport acknowledgement

Is it possible to view the System / transport acknowledgement for a message that was sent out from XI in the XI Message Monitor? If yes, how?
Thanks.

Hi,
You should see acknowledgment message in the top left corner of SXI_MONITOR (SXMB_MONI). It is subnode of the top node. Just double click on it.
Regards,
Wojciech

What is r3 systems and landscapes ,

hi
what is r3 systems and landscapes , what is diffrence between this

Hi Shivaji,
R/3 System is a Set Of Layers 1. Application
2. Data Base
3. Presentation
Where u can get in touch in one shot.
R/3 system
R/3 System Architecture
And Lanscape is depend upon Client
See thre Below Links
Landscape
Re: Land Scape...?
Reward If Helpful..
Regards..
Praveen Kumar.D

SOP for transporting deployed VC model in 3 systems EP landscape

Hi experts,
I have a question which I hope to find answers.
My company adopts a 3 system landscape for both backend R/3 ECC6 and EP on NW04s.
Is there any standard operations procedures as to how we should transport the Visual Composer applications?
If there are any documentations, appreciate if you'd share it with me.
Currently, my Portal Admin creates a transport package and transport via the Content Adminstration page in the below sequence:
1) Develop in Visual Composer Storyboard in Development Server
2) Deploy to Development Server's Portal PCD Directory
3) Portal Admin creates transport package and request and transports it to QA Portal
4) Upon passing UAT, portal admin will create transport request and transports it to Production Portal.
Useful answers that answers my questions will be rewarded with points.
Thank you.
Regards,
Damien

Hi,
yes that is only way to Transport the Visual Composer models of VC7.0 .
In PCD of portal you will get the XML and its related info that
that will be converted to Business packages.
but this problems are not there with Visual Composer 7.1 i.e Composite Environment.
there we can creat the models directly under DTR so any body can take it form there and aplly thier applications.
Regards,
Govindu

TMS QA in a Four-system landscape

Hello,
Today we use a standard R\3 system landscape (Dev->Qua->Prod) with a TMS QA installed on the Qua system. We would like to add a fourth system (called Vma). Actually, this system is another consolidation system that should work in parallel with the current Qua.
All Transport Requests (TR) transport in Qua must be transported in Vma too. We would like that the TMS QA manage all TR from VM6 and CM6. It means that a TR must be approved in Qua AND in Vma before going to Prod. Is it technically feasible to manage 2 systems in parallel through the TMS QA?
Thanks in advance for any answer\suggestions on this topic.

Hi Olivier,
as I know this is not possible, you can only define one system as the QA system. You have the possibility to add an additional approval step e.g. Tested in Vma or an other opportunity would be to use the Transport Workflow.
Regards
Tahran

Creating a virtual system for transport landscape

Hello
We have an isolated system that has transport system set to Local change Requests and would like to transport some of the transports into another system. I found in a thread here that we need to create a virtual system for creating a transport route. Can anyone tell me how to create the virtual system?
Thanks
A.

Hi Aleksandra,
You can create virtual system like below.
Make sure you have configured the domain controller.
Login to the system,client 000 and user with same authorization of sap*
Execute t-code STMS
from the menu Goto overview ->systems
You will get one entry of the domain controller.
Then from that screen from menu sap system -> create ->virtual system.
Provide the data for the sid and description and save your entry,
Then you can configure the root.
Regards
Ashok

Error while source system creation/Source system transport

Hi,
     In our BW implementation, the system landscape is only 2 servers. One is BW Dev, another is BW Prd. All configurations are done in BW Dev and I extracted the data from QAS for this BW Dev system.
     Since we cant create the source systems in the BW Production system, I tried to create the source system for the SAP R3 Production system in BW Dev and trying to transport this to BW Production Instance.
     I have two queries.
1. Is this way is correct for creating the Source System for BW Production system?
2. When I tried to activate the source system I am getting the following error messages. (I tested the RFC Destinations. There is no problem, I also done the configurations for logical system creation and client assignment in both the systems).
Error in source system GWPCLNT900
     Message no. RSAR502
Diagnosis
     With Remote Function Call to system GWPCLNT900 error connection closed
     (no data) ccurred.
Procedure
     Remove the cause of the error.
When tried again I got the following error message
Basic type ZSBB030 doesnt exist. EA 447
Result of the destination check: Timeout RSAR 375.
Could anyone throw some light on these errors?
Thanks in advance.
Krishna

Hi,
you need to maintain the logical systems on both R/3 and BW. You also need to set up the RFC connection with users that can log in to the other system. The R/3 system must be open for customizing in scc4.
In transaction se03 the system change options for 'Business Information Warehouse: SAP Namespace' and 'Business Information Warehouse: Customer Namespace' may need to be modifiable. I am not completely sure about this.
The last thing I will mention is that I have seen source system creation fail when the RFC-users are system users, and the source system creation worked if the RFC-users was display user while creating the source system. The RFC-users must be changed back to system user later...
Please look at best practice documents on a more step-by-step guide...
Best regards,
Christian Frier

Four systems transport landscape

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for