Frame-relay fragment command missing

Does anyone know why the frame-relay fragment command is not available on 3600 and 2600 routers running 12.2(5d) IOS? I have not been able to find a definite answer.

It is supported.
3660-4#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3660-IS-M), Version 12.2(5d), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 01-Feb-02 22:38 by kellythw
Image text-base: 0x600089C0, data-base: 0x61200000
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(6r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
3660-4 uptime is 2 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is "flash:c3660-is-mz.122-5d"
3660-4(config-map-class)#fra,
3660-4(config-map-class)#fram
3660-4(config-map-class)#frame-relay frag
3660-4(config-map-class)#frame-relay fragment ?
<16-1600> Define fragment size
3660-4(config-map-class)#frame-relay fragment 160
3660-4(config-map-class)#end
3660-4#
map-class frame-relay voiceover
frame-relay fragment 160
no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
frame-relay fair-queue

Similar Messages

"frame-relay fragment" causes link to stop working

Hi people!
I have a strange problem regarding the "frame-relay fragment xyz" command. I have the following configuration:
interface Serial0/0
description R3926704: phy. FrameRelay-Interface (Se0/0)
bandwidth 512
no ip address
max-reserved-bandwidth 95
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no ip mroute-cache
load-interval 30
no snmp trap link-status
no fair-queue
cdp enable
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay lmi-type q933a
end
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
description YYY: FR-Verbindung zum YY(Se0/0.1)
bandwidth 512
ip address A.A.A.A B.B.B.B
frame-relay class egress_queue_512k
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
end
map-class frame-relay egress_queue_512k
frame-relay cir 486000
frame-relay bc 48600
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 486000
service-policy output egress_queue
... if i change the map-class to:
map-class frame-relay egress_queue_512k_voice
frame-relay cir 486000
frame-relay bc 4860
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 486000
service-policy output egress_queue
frame-relay fragment 53
... no traffic goes over the link any more. no telnet no other traffic. the strange thing is, that i can ping the router!??
does anyone know what's the problem here??
thanks for any help!!
Mario

Mario,
You need to base the fragment size on the lowest speed link between the 2 routers. If the lowest speed link is 512k, the recommended fragment size is 640 bytes.This is to achieve a 10ms serialization delay. The formula to compute this is Max Delay X Bandwidth. Please see Table 5 in the following link for recommended fragment sizes for 10ms serialization delay for different speed links.
frame-relay fragment command
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5187/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008017cf52.html#wp1034268
Hope this helps. If so, please rate the post.
Brandon

Frame-Relay Fragment

I have a 3640 and several 2611's running 12.2(5d). I am trying to issue the frame-relay fragment command under map-class frame-relay but it is not a option. I want to break up any large packets that would cause latency in the voice traffic. Is there another way to do this other than the frame-relay fragment command?

There are 3 ways in which you could configure frame relay fragmentation. They are:
1.Using the "frame-relay fragment" command, as per the FRF.12 fragmentation.
2.Using the FRF.11 fragmentation. This method is not recommended for use with Voice over IP (VoIP).
3.Cisco Proprietary fragmentation using the command "vofr cisco"
The 3rd options could be the solution for your query.
For more details on this, please refer to the following document:
Configuring Frame Relay Fragmentation
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fwan_c/wcffrely.htm#1060792
For more details on the 3rd option give above, you could refer to:
Cisco Proprietary Voice Encapsulation
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca6a9.html#xtocid232909

"frame-relay fragment XYZ" causes link to stop working

Hi people!
I have a strange problem regarding the "frame-relay fragment xyz" command. I have the following configuration:
interface Serial0/0
description R3926704: phy. FrameRelay-Interface (Se0/0)
bandwidth 512
no ip address
max-reserved-bandwidth 95
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no ip mroute-cache
load-interval 30
no snmp trap link-status
no fair-queue
cdp enable
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay lmi-type q933a
end
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
description YYY: FR-Verbindung zum YY(Se0/0.1)
bandwidth 512
ip address A.A.A.A B.B.B.B
frame-relay class egress_queue_512k
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
end
map-class frame-relay egress_queue_512k
frame-relay cir 486000
frame-relay bc 48600
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 486000
service-policy output egress_queue
... if i change the map-class to:
map-class frame-relay egress_queue_512k_voice
frame-relay cir 486000
frame-relay bc 4860
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 486000
service-policy output egress_queue
frame-relay fragment 53
... no traffic goes over the link any more. no telnet no other traffic. the strange thing is, that i can ping the router!??
does anyone know what's the problem here??
thanks for any help!!
Mario

also, this fragment size must be set on both sides of the link, the same size, even if the hub has a greater link speed than the spoke.
see this document for more info:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094af9.shtml#topic9

Frame Relay - FDL Command for 3900 Router T1?

Transitioning from 3825 to 3945 (OS is 15.0(1r)M13 c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.m4). Turning on FDL on the 3825 was easy but the same command on the 3945 doesn't work. Any ideas?

The command on the 3825 was: service-module t1 fdl both
Doesn't seem to work on the 3945 OS. Any ideas on how to turn on the FDL for the T1 interface?
Thanks in advance for any direction you can give on this.

Frame-relay packet fragmenting on a 2611

I have a 2611 router that I am prioritizing voice traffic over frame-relay. The traffic is converted to ip by a siemens phone system. I am just prioritizing the specified udp ports. I want to fragment the frame-relay packets but under the map-class statement frame-relay fragment is not a option. Should I do this somewhere else?

yeap.. it's under map-class, see example:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094193.shtml
which IOS version do you have? 2600 has FRF.12 since 12.0.4T AFAIK.
regards
Mirek

Fram Relay hub and spoke scenario

See the attachment please
Requirements:
1.Using only physical interfaces configure a Frame Relay hub-and-spoke network between RTA and RTB and RTC, RTB as the hub.
2.Traffic from RTA destined for RTC should transit RTB, and vice versa.
3.Use only the DLCIs specified in the diagram.
4.Do not use any Dynamic layer 3 to layer 2 mappings over these frame Relay connections.
5.Do not send any redundant broadcast traffic from the spokes to the hub.
RTB (Hub):
interface Serial0/0
ip address 3.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 200 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 300 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
RTA (Spoke):
interface Serial0/0
ip address 3.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.2 22 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22
no frame-relay inverse-arp
RTC (Spoke):
interface Serial1/0
ip address 3.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.2 33 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33
no frame-relay inverse-arp
My queries:
A- Does he use these two statements because (frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22 and frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33 ) of requirement number 2 ?
B- Doesnt he use keyword broadcast in these two statements (frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22 and frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33) because of requirement 5?
C- Does that mean if requirement 5 is not there we should have used broadcast keyword ?
D- Does not that contradict with what Cisco syas: The broadcast keyword is commonly used with the frame relay map command ?
E- By using these two statements (frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22 and frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33) doesnt my network become full mesh? but if you look to the diagram it is partial mesh ?

Answers to your queries:
A. Correct
B. Correct
C. That depends. In most cases, it is a good idea to have broadcasts on, especially when using routing protocols like OSPF which send traffic to multicast destinations. I would habe it on most times.
D. The recommendation from Cisco is not contradictory. The lab scenario is making you do something quite specific so you have to follow that. You don't always have to follow requirements in order to make things work.
E. No. Full-mesh refers to a full mesh of PVCs. If there was a PVC from A to C it would be full mesh.
Hope that helps - pls rate the post if it does.
Paresh

Map-class frame-relay , policy map

Does a service-policy output have to be applied to an interface for qos to work?
here is the config but there is nothing applied to the serial interface..
Thanks for your help
policy-map 256/128KVoice
class 256/128KVoice
priority 112
class class-default
fair-queue
map-class frame-relay 256/128KVoice
frame-relay cir 128000
frame-relay bc 1280
frame-relay be 600
frame-relay mincir 128000
no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
frame-relay fair-queue
frame-relay fragment 150
frame-relay ip rtp priority 16384 16380 210
interface Serial0/0
bandwidth 1544
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.255
ip route-cache flow
no fair-queue
service-module t1 timeslots 1-24

Hello,
Will QOS will work in this way where class is put on WAN interface where it should be service policy.
router#sh run interface Se0/0/0.1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 239 bytes
interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
bandwidth 2048
ip address XXXX
ip nat outside
frame-relay interface-dlci 555
class COS-OUT-S0/0/0.1
end
COS-OUT-S0/0/0.1 is defined as policy map with class of voice and video.
When checking on WAN int #sh policy-map interface Se0/0/0.1 , can see output of service policy input/output with policy map recpective classes and packets match entries.Is QOS working with this configuration?
Appreciate any input on this.
Regards,
Brajesh.

Voice over Frame-Relay

Hi,
Customer of me has several sites connected with leased lines. The leased lines have frame-relay encapsulation (frame-relay back-to-back)
The line has two pvc's configured, one for voice and one for data. The voice PVC works fine. On the data pvc we want to put some QoS.
Here is the partial configuration:
interface Serial0
bandwidth 2000
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
no ip route-cache cef
ip route-cache flow
no ip mroute-cache
frame-relay intf-type dce
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.xx.xx.1 255.255.255.252
no ip mroute-cache
frame-relay interface-dlci 120
interface Serial0.2 point-to-point
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
no ip mroute-cache
frame-relay interface-dlci 100
class VOICE
vofr cisco
map-class frame-relay VOICE
frame-relay cir 512000
frame-relay voice bandwidth 256000
frame-relay fragment 320
frame-relay fair-queue
Question is can I just apply a service policy out to the data DLCI or doi i also have to enable frame-relay traffic shaping?
Thanks,
JH

The disadvantage of shaping is that it will actually limit you bandwidth. That is, you won't be able to use the circuit at full capacity, because of the artificial limitation induced by shaping. This is particularly true for a situation like you where the actual circuits is a leased line, and not a FR network.
A better approach would be to reconfigure for simple hdlc encap, and run VoIP instead. This way, you would have all the QOS features you need for voice and data, and be able to use the full capacity with a much simpler configuration.
Actually, even if you want to retain the FR encapsulation and the voice over FR approach, still using a single PVC would be better, for the same reasons given above.
Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!

Frame-relay - config a router as a switch

I am trying to configure a router as a frame-relay switch called R3.
R1 (S0/1) is connected to my Frame-Relay Switch R3 (S1/0). R3 has a further 3 connections (S1/1, S1/2 & S1/3) to R2, R4 &R5. So R1 uses subinterfaces.
I am having problems configuring the switch to say connect R1 to R2.
Here is my R1 config:
Interface Serial0/0
No ip address
Encapsulation frame-relay
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 17
interface Serial0/0.3 point-to-point
ip address 10.1.3.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 18
Here is my Frame-Relay switch (R3) config:
frame-relay switching
Interface Serial1/0
No ip address
Encapsulation frame-relay
Clock rate 64000
Frame-relay intf-type dce
interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
interface Serial1/0.2 point-to-point
frame-relay interface-dlci 17
interface Serial1/0.3 point-to-point
frame-relay interface-dlci 18
Interface Serial1/1
No ip address
Encapsulation frame-relay
Clock rate 64000
frame-relay interface-dlci 20
Interface Serial1/2
No ip address
Encapsulation frame-relay
Clock rate 64000
frame-relay interface-dlci 21
Interface Serial1/3
No ip address
Encapsulation frame-relay
Clock rate 64000
frame-relay interface-dlci 22
Here is my R2 config:
interface Serial0/0
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no fair-queue
frame-relay interface-dlci 20
Normally I would enter the frame-relay switch command?
Frame-relay route 16 interface s1/1 20
I want to use subinterrfaces and not multipoint.
Why does this not work?? I cannot get connectivity from R1 to R2!

John
It is fine to use subinterfaces on R1 and R2 (in fact it is best practice to use point to point subinterface for Frame Relay). But I do not believe that you can do subintefaces on the router that is acting as the switch. I believe that the key elements of the router as frame relay switch include: frame-relay switching (which you have), Frame-relay intf-type dce (which you have), and Frame-relay route 16 interface s1/1 20 (which you need to add in place of the subinterfaces with DLCI identifier).
HTH
Rick

Frame-relay interface-dlci switched command

Hi,
I want to understand the frame-relay interface-dlci switched command on router.
I know it is used for local switching, but what this command exectly does? is it emulating router to behave like a frame-relay switch for particular interfaces (not all interfaces)?
To use this command router serial interface needs to be have only layer 2 information or it can use that interface for layer 3 connectivity also?
regards
Devang Patel

Hi,
Thanks for your replies...
In FRoMPLS we use connect configuration on global configuration mode with xconnect command to configure FRoMPLS. then how frame-replay interface-dlci switched will work with FRoMPLS, will it add any additional feature to configuration? I am just trying to understand the use of this command.
will after putting this command i will have functionality to configure L2 and L3 VLAN configuration on same interface?
am i correct with my understanding posted in this reply as well as my initial post?
thanks,
Devang Patel

ASR1K 5xE1 MFR Frame relay traffic not forwarding in one direction

Dear Techies,
Hope all is well !
Im doing this inter-op testing with Alcatel device for frame-relay and MFRs and got stuck at this situation which is actually mind boggling and I think i might be missing something "silly" :-(
Its a simple setup of
1. My ASR 1002-X with a LAN (Gig0/0/0) port is connected to a traffic generator.(ixia).
2. ASR WAN port is a 5xE1 bundled into a MFR circuit.
3. WAN link goes to a Alcatel box giving me my FR-DCE with E1s over MFR.
Issue is , I can send traffic to max throughput with  flow initiated from LAN to WAN bit NOT the reverse flow initiated  from WAN side to LAN port. I see traffic coming into my 5xE1s (1.8 mbps each) but the traffic just wont go to the LAN side , somewhere it gets "stuck" or "dropped".
PING works fine from both sides.......but sending traffic is not possible !!
ASR CONFIG
controller SONET 0/3/0
framing sdh
clock source line
aug mapping au-4
au-4 1 tug-3 1
mode c-12
tug-2 1 e1 1 unframed
tug-2 1 e1 2 unframed
tug-2 1 e1 3 unframed
tug-2 2 e1 1 unframed
tug-2 2 e1 2 unframed
tug-2 2 e1 3 unframed
au-4 1 tug-3 2
mode c-12
tug-2 1 e1 1 unframed
tug-2 1 e1 2 unframed
tug-2 1 e1 3 unframed
au-4 1 tug-3 3
mode c-12
interface MFR1
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
load-interval 30
frame-relay multilink bid 10MB-PiPe
frame-relay multilink bandwidth-class a
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
interface MFR1.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.10.17.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 100
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
load-interval 30
negotiation auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0.110
encapsulation dot1Q 110
ip address 11.11.11.1 255.255.255.0
interface Serial0/3/0.1/1/1/1:0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
frame-relay multilink lid First-Link
interface Serial0/3/0.1/1/1/2:0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
frame-relay multilink lid Second-Link
interface Serial0/3/0.1/1/1/3:0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
frame-relay multilink lid Third-Link
interface Serial0/3/0.1/1/2/1:0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
frame-relay multilink lid Fourth-Link
interface Serial0/3/0.1/1/2/2:0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay MFR1
frame-relay multilink lid Fifth-Link
SDH_FR#sh frame-relay mul
SDH_FR#sh frame-relay multilink
Bundle: MFR1, State = up, class = A, fragmentation disabled
BID = 10MB-PiPe
Bundle links:
Serial0/3/0.1/1/1/1:0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = First-Link
Serial0/3/0.1/1/2/2:0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Fifth-Link
Serial0/3/0.1/1/2/1:0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Fourth-Link
Serial0/3/0.1/1/1/3:0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Third-Link
Serial0/3/0.1/1/1/2:0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Second-Link
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#sh fram
SDH_FR#sh frame-relay pvc 100
PVC Statistics for interface MFR1 (Frame Relay DTE)
DLCI = 100, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = MFR1.1
input pkts 8045 output pkts 8044 in bytes 515748
out bytes 527920 dropped pkts 0 in pkts dropped 0
out pkts dropped 0 out bytes dropped 0
in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0
out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0
5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 2 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 1000 bits/sec, 2 packets/sec
pvc create time 01:07:58, last time pvc status changed 01:07:58
fragment type end-to-end fragment size 1400
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#ping 10.10.17.1-------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS IS ALCATEL SIDE FROM TRAFFIC HAS TO COME.
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.17.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 3/3/4 ms
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#
SDH_FR#sh frame-relay traffic
Frame Relay statistics:
ARP requests sent 0, ARP replies sent 0
ARP request recvd 0, ARP replies recvd 0
SDH_FR#

What is the access rate of the head end?
Are you using a codec other than G711?
How many total sites are involved, what protocols are you running?
From the math, 32K is not enough CIR to ensure 4 calls proper Bandwidth. At what point is the voice degrading, is is choppy missing message, sound, jitter, echo or after 1, 2 or 3 calls.
Even if you are using G729a, voice packets could be dropped. Not to say that it is here, but look at the FRS stats to see ip packets are being dropped.
Traffic shaping is always recommended, rtp header compression will help, but the trade-off is around a 20% CPU hit.
If you implement traffic shapping , it needs to be done throughout the network as queueing delays related to data on other slow links and at the headend (specifically here) could be the cause of the distortion alone. I would at least try traffic shapping first, then if the problem doen't go away, increase CIR for Voice, if there are still issues, implement LLQ.

No modem conection with voip over frame-relay

I'm trying to connect two modems through voip over frame-relay network using the modem passthrough command but that is no working. The voice calls is operating very well but the modems no connect between them. I'm using G-729 codec with ip header compression and data fragment in 80 bytes.

There are some know issues with cisco dsps and V.90+ modems, but we have been able to get most modems to work correctly accross our network. If you are using g729 for all other voice calls you will want to use the modem passthrough command to have both gw's turn to modem passthrough. I typically set up each dial peer with the specific commands, since I have found the global commands are not consistently applied. Here is a sample dial peer config....
dial-peer voice 3 voip
description Default voip peer
preference 1
incoming called-number .T
destination-pattern .T
progress_ind setup enable 3
progress_ind connect enable 8
modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw
voice-class codec 1
session protocol sipv2
session target sip-server
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
fax rate disable
fax protocol pass-through g711ulaw
ip qos dscp cs3 signaling
no vad
Some of these commands are specific to the isdn signaling set up we have at this site. Also, we are using sip hence the sip session target. But the modem and fax passthrough commands are pretty much universal.
Also, some of those commands are not supported until 12.2.13. You might want to think about an ios upgrade.

Configuring Frame-Relay and the Frame-Relay Switch To Participate in WAN Routing

Hey,
My WAN in my voice lab is currently functional between all of my routers HQ, BR1, and BR1 with full-mesh connectivity. I am using my PSTN router for the frame-relay switching as is shown in the attached configs. I have used the connect commands for the PVC routing logic.
connect HQ-BR1 Serial0/3/0 101 Serial0/2/0 201
connect HQ-BR2 Serial0/3/0 102 Serial0/2/1 301
connect BR1-BR2 Serial0/2/0 202 Serial0/2/1 302
My question concerns the possibility of getting the PSTN router to participate in the WAN and the OSPF routing process? The connect command tells how the PVCs are to be connected and pass through the PSTN router. Is there anyway to do it so that a PVC connects to the PSTN router itself?
I would specifically like to create a connection between the HQ and PSTN router over the WAN. If anyone has any insight on this I would really appreciate it.
Thank you.

Hello Adam,
you don't need to do FR switching.
You just need to configure a back to back PVC associated to a p2p subinterface under PSTN router interface se0/3/0 and HQ:se0/1/0. the new PVC can be 103 on both sides
PSTN
interface ser0/3/0.103 point-to-point
ip address 10.1.13.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 103
HQ
interface ser0/1/0.103 point-to-point
ip address 10.1.13.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 103
note: I was able to do this using the older syntax frame-relay route under interface configuration on frame relay switch. I would expect to work for you too with newer syntax connect.
Hope to help
Giuseppe

Frame Relay Configuration

All,
Sorry for asking this, but I have been beating my head against the wall here. I am getting a T1 installed in my residence for internet connectivity. I am using an old wic-1-dsu-t1-v1 in a 2610 router. I am unable to get this configuration working. I have a very simple configuration so far on the router, but I am unable to get this to come up. I have put the show run below. Some of the commands are default and are not showing up. Obviously I have changed the ip's to generic ones below. Any ideas?
version 12.1
no service single-slot-reload-enable
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
hostname JSS-2610-001
memory-size iomem 10
ip subnet-zero
interface Ethernet0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
shutdown
interface Serial0/2
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
interface Serial0/2.21 point-to-point
ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.2
ip http server
line con 0
speed 115200
line aux 0
line vty 0 4

Sorry when I transposed the ip's to post i made a mistake in them. 1.1.1.2 is my address and 1.1.1.1 is the gateway for them (their side of the t1). I have it configure correctly on my router with the real ip's.
Here is the post to the rest of your questions:
Serial0/2 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
LMI enq sent 16787, LMI stat recvd 16788, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up
LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0
LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE
FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down
Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 2812/0, interface broadcasts 15
Last input 00:00:04, output 00:00:04, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1d22h
Input queue: 0/75/3/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: weighted fair
Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
Conversations 0/1/256 (active/max active/max total)
Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
16791 packets input, 249054 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 1 giants, 0 throttles
3350 input errors, 1097 CRC, 1758 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 495 abort
19638 packets output, 1080335 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
6 carrier transitions
DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up
JSS-2610-001#show frame-relay pvc
PVC Statistics for interface Serial0/2 (Frame Relay DTE)
Active Inactive Deleted Static
Local 1 0 0 0
Switched 0 0 0 0
Unused 0 0 0 0
DLCI = 16, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0/2.21
input pkts 0 output pkts 2834 in bytes 0
out bytes 844139 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0
in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0
in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
out bcast pkts 2809 out bcast bytes 841611
pvc create time 1d22h, last time pvc status changed 15:31:28
Is it possible the carrier just hasn't "activated" the circuit?

Frame-relay fragment command missing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for